整体生命科学基础理论Ⅰ 整 体 板 块 遗 传律——宇宙大爆炸整体 生命学 赵大庆 强燕平著
整体生命科学基础理论Ⅰ
整 体 板 块 遗
传律
——宇宙大爆炸整体
生命学
赵大庆 强燕平著
中国文化出版社TitleofBook: The Genetic LawofWhole Plate: TheBigBang Theo
ry ofWhole Lif
e |整体
板块遗传律： 宇宙大爆炸整体生命学
整体板块遗传律： 宇宙大爆炸整体生命
Author(s):ZhaoDaging. Qiang Y
a
npi
ng |赵大庆 强燕平
ISBN:979
-
8
-
88874309
-
6
List Price:US S8.00; CN
¥66.00
Copyright
e 2024 by Overseas Chinese Pres I
n
c| I
mp
i
n
t China C
u
lture P
t
ess
Det
a
led Subjec
t(s):Soci
a
l sciences; PublicationDate: M
a
rch 2024.
学
作 者： 赵大庆 强燕平
责任编辑： 田绪清
封面设计： 安 迪
出版发行： 中国文化出版社 (China Culhure Press)
地 址： 纽约州奥尔巴尼市州街90号700单元40室
网 址 ： htps:/www.oc-press.com
邮 箱 ： ocpress
@
f
o
xmailcom
规 格 ： 787×1092毫米， 16开 ， 32印张
字 数： 340千字
版 次 ： 2024年3月第1版
印 次： 2024年 3月第1次印刷
书 号 ： ISBN 979-8-88874-
309
-
6
定 价 ： US S8.00 CN¥56.00
版权所有， 请勿翻印。 如有装订错误， 请与我们联系更换。
谨以此书：
献给为人类医学生
物学科学回归自然
顽强保护生态自然
环境殊死抗争新型
“生物危害”永不间
断博弈的人们！
鸣谢
我们以无限的尊敬、虔诚与敬佩对 给于我们帮
助的每一位科学家和并不相 识的朋友们道一声感
谢：谢谢你们！谢 谢大家！ 谢谢、谢谢、谢谢！
如果没有范惠民老师和赵大庆博士 “相遇变黄
金”的通力支持与合作，就 不会有“整体生命学”
理论著作在清华 园的诞生；如果没有这种团队精神，
《整体板块遗传律》、《种性制约机制》、《人工自
然选择律》、《微生态变异原理》就很难完成问世。
对此，我们借此书出版的机会，对抗疫顽强拼搏和献
出宝贵生命的英雄和父辈们……道一声深情和诚挚
的感谢和永存的敬佩！
尊敬的朋友啊！让我们出自内心地表述对你们由
衷地感谢吧！
谢谢！ 谢谢！ … …目录
自序 ................................................................... 1
第一章 自然科学历史“后相对论”古希腊认识论起源与人类自然科学（婴儿期）希腊人初建
自然科学金字塔辉煌成为全人类现代自然科学第一基石功垂千古
一、托勒密开创“对点”揭秘宇宙大爆炸行星量子纠缠起源之“后相对论”认识论 ..... 8
二、宇宙大爆炸原力是“量子纠缠”初始就存在的微观量子“纠缠”本原 ........... 12
三、托勒密用“对点”为全世界人类科学金字塔宇宙“万物皆数”量子应用奠基 ...... 14
四、托勒密地球静止历史性却长期传承人类科学“后相对论宇宙认识论”科学金字塔大宇宙
格局 .................................................................. 15
五、哥白尼天球“日心论”并没有改变托勒密天文学【“后相对论”的认识论】金字塔基石
而是演化出宇宙完美的椭圆轨道与宇宙和谐艺术 ............................... 17
六、亚里士多德百科全书特别是物理学为什么能统治人类科学历史 2000 多年不衰而成为现
代科学基础这得益托勒密开创的【“后相对论”的认识论】 ...................... 19
七、亚里士多德的惯性定律与伽利略惯性定律碰撞产生实验科学伟大新纪元突显“后相对论”
认识论使人类科学金字塔不断跃上峰巅....................................... 21
八、“伽利略相对性”原理是托勒密“对点”【“后相对论”的认识论】灵光一现在哥白尼
地动说的深刻顿悟并确认了“后相对论”认识论在经典力学无法颠覆的统治.......... 23
九、从伽利略到牛顿三定律极大地稳固扩展了苏格拉底、柏拉图、亚里士多德到托勒密开创
的人类科学金字塔基座壮阔峰顶千古不断跃升 ................................. 25
十、【后相对论认识论】起源宇宙大爆炸在古希腊 3000 年城邦完善创建至高无上的人类科
学金字塔永不间断的万古辉煌 .............................................. 28
十一、科学历史证明爱因斯坦运用“后相对论”认识论发现“广义相对论”确认了古希腊
3000 年以来人类科学金字塔丰碑最宝贵之思维方法论........................... 30
十二、以玻尔为首的哥本哈根学派和爱因斯坦在索尔维会议大论战诠释认定爱因斯坦“决定论”
是完全错误并得到 2022 年诺贝尔奖证明..................................... 32
十三、从克劳泽到阿斯佩再到蔡林格，一代代物理学家终于用确凿的实验数据证明，量子纠
缠是真实的存在胜利属于哥本哈根学派....................................... 34
十四、科学家必须回过头来重新审视“迈克尔逊 - 莫雷实验”它同样是“完全决定性的理论——
局域隐变量理论。”的爱氏产物 ............................................ 37
十五、宇宙“量子纠缠”超光速在量子力学是独一无二的真实存在看人类科学金字塔“超光速”
升华峰顶 .............................................................. 40
十六、整体生命学起源宇宙大爆炸希腊人先知先觉创造整体生命学和拓展现代医学“整体性”
是不争是事实........................................................... 46
十七、美国科学院院士、临床专家托马斯对人体与宇宙地球生命的整体性总结和《盖亚假说》
的深刻预言 ............................................................ 52
十八、宇宙大爆炸确认万物生长靠太阳却和现代科学主流在一个宇宙时间轴存在严重矛盾太
阳却早在 100 亿年前就诞生............................................... 55
第二章 刘易斯 . 托马斯论“整体生命学”
一、“刘易斯准则” ..................................................... 62
二、托马斯论整体生命学不可分割的三大优势 ................................. 66
三、莫诺对整体板块遗传的实验证明 ........................................ 74第三章 孟德尔经典遗传学“整体板块遗传律”揭示性基因量子性丰富内涵
一、孟德尔遗传方阵 ..................................................... 77
二、 孟德尔遗传方阵 3:1 数理凸显宇宙大爆炸生命半株繁殖演绎................. 80
三、从孟德尔 3:1 到查伽夫碱基量子基因半株配对隐涵的“整体板块遗传律”....... 81
四、破解整体板块遗产密码................................................ 84
五、从孟德尔遗传方阵演绎导出 Q-J 方程式 .................................. 86
六、关于 Q-J 方程潜秘斐波那契数理讨论 .................................... 87
七、Q-J 方程式在 SARS 疫情大数据应用与验证 ............................... 89
第四章 《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回顾
九、修道院里诞生的生命数论（按原版书章序号）《给年创新的支点》理论科学历史回顾：
...................................................................... 94
十、寻找孟德尔的密钥字母（按原版书顺序号排列）............................117
第五章 《给你创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回顾：
十一、富兰克林在三阶梯前驻足（按原版书章序序号） ..........................128
第六章 《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回顾
十二、相交在神秘的 DNA（按原版书章顺序号） ...............................138
第七章 《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回顾
十三、基因到底是什么（按原版书章顺序号） .................................150
第八章 富兰克林千古无法磨灭的 DNA 历史功绩
一、美女科学家富兰克林的“名义学位”.....................................161
二、富兰克林获得博士学位二战后进入国王学院 ...............................161
三、衍射图原理与算法 ...................................................162
四、富兰克林 A 型衍射图的三维立体概念隐含量子属性 .........................164
五、科学史上唯一悼念 A 型 DNA 双螺旋结构讣闻..............................165
六、现代史以来最美的一张 X 射线照片......................................166
七、A 型 DNA 对称性水到渠成构成双螺旋结构 ................................167
八、三篇论文同时在《自然》发表彰显第一原创者错位 ..........................168
九、“黑暗女士”千古不朽的伟大女神科学家 .................................169
第九章 《整体板块遗传律》宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论与西方科学家最新遗传理论对照文摘
见证与讨论
1、美国天普大学的 Carmen Sapienza 说.....................................172
2、澳大利亚昆士兰大学分子生物学研究所所长 S.Mattick 说 ....................172
3、2003 年 5 月，日本崎玉医科大学广常真治（Shinii Hirotsune） ..............173
4、S.Mattick 还指出：“RNA 的优点是它有一个特殊的序列，因此它是数字化的，就像邮政
编码一样。”...........................................................173
5、据报道 2004 年 CDC 就开始利用 1997 年香港禽流感爆发时期菌株和实验室常用的人类
流感病毒制造杂交病毒 ...................................................174
6、诺贝尔获得者毕晓普发现原始癌细胞变异 ..................................175
7、美国耶鲁大学 R.Breaker 的实验室研究发现基因开关 ........................175
8、生命的整体性是细胞自身自生的。西方科学家早有细胞层面的生命整体性认识 .....176
9、美国科学家研究指出：“基因组机制的两个部分共同关闭第三部分 ..............177
10、基因的活动，蛋白质组的功能的运转，都离不开生命动力 ....................178
11、1986 年 3 月 7 日雷托 . 杜伯克开始的人类基因组计划 .....................178
美国加州大学旧金山分校 StanIey B. Prusiner 普鲁西纳教授 1982 年因发现朊病毒从人类生命科学史去考察，生物学是 19 世纪替代“自然哲学”的产物...................179
第十章 《整体板块遗传律》理论兼“种性制约机制”与西方科学家最新遗传学理论对照文摘
与讨论（续）
1、“细胞来自细胞”是整体生命学的整体基础，它演绎出生命“整体来自整体” .....181
2、《圣经》的一句箴言是：上帝总要保持他创造的全部物种！....................183
3、让我们再从生命物种的多样性来讨论“种性制约机制” .......................184
4、在细胞层面这种“死亡之吻”表现得更为普遍 ..............................187
5、事实上，孟德尔的遗传理论已经揭示了“种性制约机制”机理的来龙去脉.........188
6、达尔文根本没有解决人类进化的具体时间和地点.............................193
7、我们在《整体板块遗传律》中讨论过食性基因的演化和累积，认为有机体（以人为例）是
通过“食基因”.........................................................196
8、人类农耕有史记载可推到 1-2 万年前，无文字记载的时间会在数十亿年或更久远 197
9、著名的法国生物学家布丰最早提出生物演化三因素...........................198
10、具体的说食物基因进入人体是最有秩序的，食品基因是最为有序的蛋白质复杂构件 200
11、 生存斗争是种性制约机制的另一种表达形式 ..............................202
12、从生命螺旋线轨迹来考察 ..............................................203
13、生命起源细菌化石记录的生命 DNA 时代早就从细菌开始了....................206
14、2005 年 3 月 20 日美国普度大学病理科学家博卢伊特等人已经发现，植物的基因有一
种自我更正机制.........................................................209
15、科学家已经发现了 DNA 上的密码顺序的不连续性重复与间隔..................211
16、种性制约机制是保证遗传稳定的唯一法则 .................................215
17、分子生物学并不能解决人类疾病与健康的诸多矛盾，更无法治愈瘟疫 ...........218
18、20 世纪末诞生的“系统生物学”欠缺整体性仍然是在细胞生物学的框架内.......220
19、20 世纪后 50 年，科学家在薛定谔量子生命理论的指导下，由沃森和克里克实现了 DNA
双螺旋结构 ............................................................222
20、“整体生命学”是 21 世纪大科学到来，人们开始用整体论和系统的观点理解生命运动
......................................................................223
第十一章 生命生态熵的由来
一、生态熵缘于宇宙大爆炸原力 ............................................224
二、奇点的由来.........................................................225
三、宇宙基因密码在“奇点”已经存在宇宙生命量子属性 ........................227
四、宇宙诞生后约 1 秒时各处的温度约为 100 亿度符合“轻元素丰度” ...........228
五、宇宙生命加速“扩张”与“死亡”.......................................229
六、宇宙大爆炸普朗克时间（秒）与能量年轮刻度①............................230
七、宇宙大爆炸普朗克时间（秒）与能量年轮刻度②............................231
第十二章 揭开宇宙大爆炸基因密码原理在行星太阳系普遍性遗留表述的加密
一、开普勒行星“普适定律” ..............................................233
二、开普勒行星三定律 ...................................................233
三、开普勒第三定律来自宇宙大爆炸智能原力的广谱加密与应 ....................234
四、开普勒揭示了大宇宙体系整体生命体系和谐秘籍............................234
五、哈雷彗星诡秘循环彰显万有引力普适和谐始于宇宙大爆炸 ....................235
六、牛顿万有引力定律神奇发现海王星是对宇宙大爆炸基元行星揭密 ...............237
七、测量星系和星团中炽热气体的温度分布的万有引力效应影响整个星团发现暗物质 ..239
八、现代世界科学家坦言宇宙大爆炸是“上帝的思想” ..........................240九、幽灵般超距作用成真是对“迈克尔逊 - 莫雷”实验的颠覆 ....................242
第十三章 宇宙大爆炸生命形成 DNA 结构的三维立体与生命“软性封闭系统”
一、生命得以“活”着必然存在“软性封闭系统”..............................245
二、生态能是“软性封闭系统”生命存在的亘古本性............................246
三、软性封闭系统的旁边“生态熵” ........................................247
四、“生态熵”四要素 ...................................................248
五、“生态熵”三要素是生命“软性封闭系统”活着之能量本源...................250
六、古老化石证明百亿年左右前就诞生了细菌微生物............................250
七、古希腊早就揭示人体“软性封闭系统”之生命本性 ..........................251
八、布尔吉斯生命化石群把生命起源推到五亿年前甚至更早仅仅是现代人的化石印记到是达
尔文的噩梦 ............................................................252
九、现代土壤形成微生物 37 亿年的“软性封闭系统”生命属性仍然欠缺宇宙大爆炸时间轴
的确切时间频段.........................................................253
第十四章 宇宙大爆炸太阳太阳系诞生形成的整体生命学反思
一、万物生长靠太阳 .....................................................257
二、对太阳与太阳系人类的认知太晚了吧.....................................257
三、现代人科学家说太阳诞生① ............................................260
四、现代人科学家说太阳诞生② ............................................261
五、现代人科学家说太阳诞生③ ............................................262
六、现代人科学家说太阳诞生④ ............................................263
七、现代人科学家说太阳诞生⑤ ............................................263
八、太阳太阳系诞生形成和宇宙大爆炸整体生命学“小宇宙体系”思考与反思① ......256
九、太阳太阳系诞生形成和宇宙大爆炸整体生命学思考与反思②...................266
十、从小宇宙体系诞生形成看宇宙生命奇点与爆炸..............................267
十一、大、小宇宙体系的宇宙诞生都存在形成“奇点、爆炸” ....................268
十二、宇宙大爆炸理论简史................................................269
第十五章 “生态熵”原力与整体生命学的起源！
一、光和生命...........................................................271
二、从宇宙大爆炸时间轴看现代人科学家对光合作用本质与植物生命认识就更晚 ......272
三、光的本性与以太量子属性 ..............................................274
四、光的粒子与波动源彰显“量子纠缠”.....................................277
五、光照与土壤在宇宙大爆炸后 104 亿年 -30 万年形成.........................278
六、大爆炸土壤与生命相得益彰创造物与人类农业人工选择渐渐出现形成 ...........278
七、卡森研究证明微生物史前存在与土壤形成和神秘起源相得益彰.................281
八、地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论① ......................282
九、地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论② ......................283
十、地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论③ ......................285
十一、宇宙大爆炸行星地球广宇原力“本生通道”..............................287
十二、宇宙大爆炸之初的负能量熵循环 -“太地循环” ..........................289
十三、宇宙大爆炸自然形成了行星星系多元广宇“负能量”熵微循环自然出现太地循环 290
十四、宇宙大爆炸赋予太阳系行星星系相同的化学元素组成 ......................292
十五、宇宙大爆炸过程宇宙中“热力学第二定律”无序耗散或熵的总量总是随着时间的推移
而增加 ................................................................293
十六、宇宙大爆炸遵循物理学定律 NAPN 俯视平面图 NAPN 图： ...................295十七、宇宙大爆炸超级速率释放能量方程式 -Q-J 方程 ..........................299
十八、宇宙大爆炸理论的孟德尔“3:1”数理与万有引力定律平方反比 ..............301
十九、宇宙大爆炸原力数控演化痕迹与狮身人面像“瘦身”痕的蛛丝马迹现代解密 ....303
二十、“把一粒沙放在一臂远的指尖上”前 130 亿年的奇点彩照确认宇宙大爆炸 .....305
第十六章 本生发现星系“球域负熵”全天候微生命生态“通道”是对宇宙大爆炸无处不在的
微细证明
一、现代人日本水俣镇发现了一种怪病.......................................308
二、现代人研究揭示甲基汞的由来 = 盐酸 + 录化物 + 细菌在淤泥大爆炸诡秘的“本生通道”
......................................................................309
三、二恶英污染大爆发无处不在姻缘 ........................................310
四、猫 - 鼠 - 蜂 - 草 - 牛 - 人生态宇宙大爆炸“负熵”循环图 ....................311
五、 本生发现宇宙大爆炸“球域负熵”全天候生命微生态“通道” ................312
六 “本生通道”是大爆炸隐秘遍布于大爆炸整体生命学和地球星系所有角落.........314
七、宇宙大爆炸生命通道与性基因“半株漂移”的量子属性 ......................316
第十七章、现代科学大师薛定谔对宇宙大爆炸整体生命学量子属性最伟大的贡献
一、薛定谔整合物理学和生命科学开创与回归宇宙大爆炸整体生命学经典量子属性“生命以
负熵为生” ............................................................318
二、《生命是什么？》确凿生命量子力学的微观物种不变论 ......................320
三、遗传机制是与量子论密切相关的甚至建立在量子论的基础之上遗传机制早就进入宇宙大
爆炸整体生命学架构之中..................................................325
四、遗传是机制！遗传是淘汰不适生存物种个体的选择过程，它是通过动植物生殖（分型）
实现的种内强者个体繁衍生命延续之生命整体性 ...............................327
第十八章 现代人的六界生物“遗传机制”本能出自宇宙大爆炸整体生命学之“种性”的亘古
不变
一、现代人科学家林奈分类学留下微生物分类空白..............................333
二、现代人科学家在绿石带上发现了一些距今 37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿年的细菌化石 ....334
三、“种性制约机制”致使科学家巴斯德发现细菌蚕病“胡椒粉”首创细菌是感染源 ..335
四、现代人科学家的“科赫准则”首次证明了一种特定的微生物是特定疾病的病原 ....336
五、现代人科学家日本生物学家勤渡边找到了微生物“自由漂浮 DNA 环” ..........338
六、现代美国生物学家考柏兰另立了一个“真菌界”............................338
七、现代科学家魏泰克把“原核生物界”归入“五界” ..........................339
八、现代病毒的发现 .....................................................340
九、现代人发现病毒的外蛋白质壳内遗传物简单属性不属于“五界”遂有“生物六界分类系
统” ..................................................................341
十、3000 年病毒对现代人类的危害史无前例① ................................343
十一、为什么六界生物普遍遵循“科赫准则”从不逾越 ..........................345
十二、3000 年病毒对人类的危害史无前例 - 病毒变异万变不离其宗且严格遵循“科赫准
则”② ................................................................346
十三、3000 多年无数病毒危害人类造成巨大灾难却每一大瘟疫病毒均彰显“神秘消失律”
......................................................................351
十四、太阳磁暴周而复始使病毒“神秘消失”彰显宇宙大爆炸对生命的亘古印记与证明 353
第十九章 “宇宙大爆炸”原力彰显“整体生命学”源起
一、宇宙整体生命属性大宇宙体系和小宇宙机制不可分割 ........................356
二、宇宙学原理与人类整体生命学起源休戚相关 ...............................358三、DNA 传递代际的生命蓝图隐含生命生死循环无法终结 ........................360
四、霍金《膨胀宇宙的性质》与小行星威胁 ...................................361
五、量子涨落的宇宙与生命种子“对点”- 受精卵 ..............................362
六、宇宙生命的整体性上帝确实是在掷骰子（爱因斯坦错了） ....................363
七、宇宙无限空间之王《至大论》之未来希腊人的宇宙大爆炸 ....................364
八、宇宙生命的扩展与终结................................................365
九、宇宙大爆炸疆域到底有多大 ............................................366
十、宇宙大爆炸疆域“韦伯”看到距离地球 7600 光年 ..........................370
第二十章 宇宙大爆炸整体生命学生态熵原理
一、大爆炸产生了大量原力能量，它同时也产生同样多的负能量在地球星系遗留神秘潜行.
......................................................................373
二、“生命以负熵为生”..................................................374
三、薛定谔“负熵”概括了法布尔生态熵的宇宙大爆炸上由来 ....................376
四、迈尔现代人科学家发现生态熵随地球纬度熵变化原理 ........................377
五、人间四月芳菲尽，山寺桃花始盛开.......................................378
六、应用量子力学定量分析熵出于宇宙大爆炸 .................................379
七、“生态熵”星系动因出自宇宙大爆炸整体“熵”原力不间断地持续膨胀与存留 ....381
第二十一章、“化石”是宇宙大爆炸整体生命学地球生物年轮的生命起源“时间窗”人为造
假化石链必须彻底摈除
一、宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论颠覆以往 3000 年古希腊至今的科学化石理论........383
二、地球化石链的人造属性背离了宇宙大爆炸整体生命学 ........................386
三、利基“化石链”没有丝毫宇宙大爆炸整体生命学痕迹完全是人为伪造的“化石链” 388
四、“化石链”建立在错误的达尔文进化论基础理论之上存在太多人为想象非科学痕迹 390
五、达尔文进化论完全背离埃迪卡拉 - 澄江 - 布尔吉斯 3 个动物群（生命大爆发）化石之间
的整体突变演化.........................................................391
六、利基人为泡制的第二阶段化石链完全不是林奈的自然体系 ....................392
七、利基人为泡制的第三阶段化石链完全不存在化石自然体系 ....................394
八、5000 年古生物学史永远找不到海克尔的“猿人”...........................395
九、诡秘的“核桃钳人”不能改变整体生命突然大爆发“间断平衡”突变论..........396
十、利基的“东非人”可变成“鲍氏南方猿人”利基的化石就这样可以变来变去造假 ..398
十一、100 多年人类学家在按图骥“猿人”去对号（四阶段）入座赫胥黎的“人是猴子变
的” ..................................................................398
十二、现代皮尔唐化石惊世造假案始末.......................................399
十三、杜布哇拼凑伪造“直立猿人”丑闻.....................................401
十四、破绽百出的“滕骨化石”与“露西”不能证明“人是猴子变的” .............403
十五、皮尔唐后化石造假丑闻在全球考古学扩大化..............................404
十六、1975 年古墓地阿法化石古猿梦碎......................................405
十七、达尔文进化论“从猿到人”欺世盗名罪源录..............................406
十八、达尔文《物种起源》存在太多太多的“推测”+ 太多的可能和可能性之模棱两可的论
述目的在偷换人猿概念 ...................................................407
十九、达尔文进化论用五个事实诡辩产生三个推论建立起来一个“从猿到人”世纪大骗局.
......................................................................410
二十、达尔文促海克尔“重演律”到利基“四阶段”假造化石链“从猿到人”百年梦断何谈
进化论 ................................................................414第二十二章 宇宙大爆炸遗留“史前文明”凸显达进化论噩梦破碎
一、真实存在的“史前文明” ..............................................421
二、距今 20 亿的大型核反应堆和 28 亿年的史前遗迹 ..........................422
三、5500 万年的武器到 26 万年的铁矛......................................423
四、希腊人柏拉图《对话录》的“亚特兰蒂斯”帝国一万年奇迹...................423
第二十三章 现代人发现宇宙大爆炸爆烈“原力”在星系宇宙地球万物“原子”核内蕴藏惊天
秘密
一、3000 年古希腊人类就预言万物原子存在希腊人的万物本原原力是什么 ..........425
二、现代人科学家玻尔原子模型 ............................................425
三、现代人玻尔与三代师生前仆后继打开了原子内核秘密 ........................427
四、现代科学家约瑟夫·汤姆森发现葡萄干布丁模型——揭开原子第一层面纱........427
五、现代科学家卢瑟福炼金术模型深入原子核 .................................428
六、现代科学家卢瑟福从原子内部能量射线与“衰变”发现原子可继续往下拆① ......429
七、现代科学家卢瑟福从原子内部能量射线与“衰变”发现原子可继续往下拆② ......430
八、现代科学家小居里夫妇错过发现中子却无缘诺贝尔奖 ........................431
九、现代人发现中子曾有一段导师（支点）佳话 ...............................432
十、现代科学家小居里夫妇发现大爆炸“链式反应”............................433
十一、现代科学家劳伦斯“回旋加速器”逐鹿 1939 年诺奖 ......................434
十二、现代科学家费米首创世界第一座可控原子核裂变链式反应堆揭开宇宙大爆炸“原力”
内潜存在万物大爆炸原力..................................................435
十三、1939 年 8 月 2 日爱因斯坦给罗斯福信 - 宇宙大爆炸（地狱）之火是这样打开的……
......................................................................436
十四、爱因斯坦后悔打开“普罗米修斯之火” .................................438
十五、现代女神迈特纳和哈恩打开了“地狱之火”边门窥到宇宙大爆炸“原力”惊世骇俗爆
裂可怕面目 ............................................................439
十六、莉泽·迈特纳乃全世界最出类拔萃第一个理论解释了奥托·哈恩 1938 年发现的核裂
变的女科学家；为人类打开了“地狱之火”边门 ...............................440
十七、现代科学家迈特纳先知先觉的人造太阳核聚变............................441
十八、重大突破美国完成核聚变正能量揭示宇宙大爆炸恒星太阳系能量由来..........443
十九、霍金在临离开人类的时候仰天叩问：“我们能在地球存活吗？” .............445
二十、霍金来不急看到俄乌战争引爆核战争毁灭世界人类近在咫尺就永远离开了我们 ..449
附录 托马斯论“机制” ..................................................457
结束语 ................................................................451
重要参考书目...........................................................497自序
小时候，妈妈总是问我：世界上“先有鸡？” 、
“还是先有蛋？”……我说先有蛋！妈妈总是笑而不
答；一直到我长大了，上了小学、中学、大专，妈妈
总是问这个老问题。我说先有鸡！或者说先有蛋！？
妈妈也总是乐个不停……我不知道妈妈有多开心！？
——童心！就这样伴随着妈妈永远的微笑离开了我
们，可我们和我们的子孙却始终不知道世界先有蛋还
是先有鸡！？
后来，有了一个更大的问题迷恋了人类：宇宙先
有“奇点”？还是在 138 亿年先有“宇宙大爆炸？”
——这和妈妈问了我们一生的问题几乎一模一样没
有答案？！……于是，便有了这一部必定改变人类
5000 年科学历史的巨著尽表妈妈的初心。也许，这是
一部必然打破撒切尔夫人“中国不会产生影响世界理
论”预言的著作；或者这是一部人类科学金字塔永远
达不到峰顶之“后相对论”认识论独一无二的方法论、
这应该是整合宇宙大爆炸 138 亿年与全世界科学所有
门类、方方面面、林林总总学科、时间与空间的深遂
思考的科学编年简史吧！
然而，1867 年，达尔文在《物种起源》洋洋洒洒
几十万言都没有说清楚我们小时候妈妈问的问题：世
1界“先有鸡？” 、 “还是先有蛋？”！？——可见《物
种起源》应该是一场持续最久的世界惊天大骗局！因
为达尔文连世界上“先有鸡？” 、 “还是先有蛋？”
都说不 明白，又如何谈演化 呢？无非 是痴人说
梦！……
有一天，我们突然发现，全人类不经意遗漏了薛
定谔最著名的“自然”开天辟地巨著《自然与希腊人
科学与人文主义》（希尔曼讲座 1949 年 5 月 24 日、
26 日、28 日和 31 日于伦敦大学学院）。在第一章薛
定谔开门见山提出问题： “为什么要回到古代思想”
（这是千百万科学家想问的难题。）薛定谔这样说：
【我认为，在人类思考世界的最早记录中偶尔发现非
常深刻的哲学思想，发现我们今天需要一番努力、作
一番抽象才能形成和掌握的一些观念，我们一般不应
感到太惊讶。或许可以认为，人类思想的这一婴儿期
（比喻的说）“离自然更近” 。理性的世界图景尚未
获得， “我们周围真实的世界”尚未构造完成，无论
如何，在印第安人、犹太人和波斯人等许多民族古老
的宗教著作中，我们的确看到了这种早期深刻思想的
许多例子。 在对这些早期的深刻思想进行比较时，
我不禁想起了多伊森（P.Deussen）这位伟大的梵文
学家和风趣的哲学家的一句话： “儿童在其生命的头
2两年不能讲话真是一个巨大的遗憾，否则，他们也许
会谈论康德哲学。 ”】——这里，薛定谔把人类自然
科学“儿童期”首创定位在公元前 6 世纪希腊人最著
名的“毕达哥拉斯学派”！
让我们阅“读第三章毕达哥拉斯学派” ：【第三
章毕达哥拉斯学派
对于像巴门尼德和普罗泰戈拉这样的人,他们所
持有的极端观点对科学能起什么作用,我们很难做出
推断,因为他们不是科学家。然而,有一个学派的思想
家却既有强烈的科学倾向,又有一种近乎宗教先人之
见的明显偏见,要把自然体系还原为纯理性，这就是
毕达哥拉斯学派(Pythagoreans)。他们主要在意大利
南部活动.即克罗顿(Croton)、锡巴里斯(Sybaris)和
塔兰托(Tarentum)等位于半岛“脚跟”与“脚趾”之
间海湾周围的一些城镇。该学派的信徒非常类似于一
个宗教团体,要求在进食或做其他事情时要有古怪的
仪式,对外人严守秘密,至少是有关教义的内容。该学
派的创始人毕达哥拉斯活跃于公元前 6 世纪下半叶,
他必定是古代最不寻常的人物之一。关于他的超自然
力量有很多传说:他能记 35 起灵魂转世(灵魂的迁居)
过程中的所有前世;有人在偶然翻动他的衣服时发现
他的大腿是纯金的。他似乎没有留下任何著作。正如
3“师曰”这一众所周知的说法所证明的,对其学生而
言,他的话就是准则,可以解决学生之间的任何争论,
最终确定无误的真理。据说,学生们敬畏于直呼其名,
遂称他为“那边的人”(yonder man)。不过,由于该
群体所具有的以上特征和态度,我们有时并不容易确
定某一特定学说是否可以追溯到他或者起源于他。
毕达哥拉斯学派深深地影响了柏拉图及其学园
(Academy)，后者明显继承了这个意大利南部学派的
先验论观点。事实上，从思想史的角度来看,我们或
可把这个雅典学派称为毕达哥拉斯学派的一个分支。
柏拉图主义者并未正式遵守“准则”,这没有什么关
系,他们急于掩饰而不是强调自己的依赖性,以提升
自己的原创性，这就更无关紧要了。关于毕达哥拉斯
学派,我们的信息主要来自于亚里士多德忠实而诚恳
的记录。不过,亚里士多德基本上不同意他们的观点,
并对其毫无根据的先验论偏见进行指责,尽管他本人
也很容易持有这种偏见。
我们知道,毕达哥拉斯学派的基本学说是“万物
皆数”,尽管-些人试图弱化这一隽语,把它说成“万
物像数”,即与数类似。我们并不清楚这一断言的真
正含义是什么。这一影响深远、意义宏大的大胆概括
很可能源自毕达哥拉斯的一项著名发现:如果用由弦
436 长的整数部分或有理数部分(如 1/2,2/3,3/4)所
产生的音程谱成和谐的乐曲,它可能会使我们感动得
落泪,仿佛直接向我们的灵魂诉说。(关于灵魂与身体
的关系,毕达哥拉斯学派有一则很美的比喻,可能出
自菲洛劳斯(Philolaus):灵魂被称为身体的和谐,灵
魂之于身体就如同乐器之于它所产生的声音。)
根据亚里士多德的观点,“事物”(即数)首先是
可感的物体。例如,恩培多克勒(Empedocles)提出了
四根说之后,四根也“变成了”数;但是像灵魂、正义、
机会这样的“事物”也有它们的数,或者说“是”它
们的数。数的分配与数论的一些简单性质相关。例如，
平方数(4,9,16,25,……)与正义有关,特别是,正义
与其中的第一个数 4 相等同。其背后的想法必定是,4
这个数可以被分成两个相等的(equal)因数(可以与
“公平、公正”[equity]、 “公平的、公正的”
[equitable]等词相比照)。数目为平方数的点可以排
成一个正方形,比如在九柱戏中就是如此。毕达哥拉
斯 学 派 也 以 同 样 的 方 式 谈 及 三 角 形 数 ， 如
3,6,10，……】鉴此，薛定谔对毕达哥拉斯学派一直
到柏拉图、亚里士多德、托勒密……古希腊自然科学
起源总结说： “无论如何，毕达哥拉斯学派凭借其对
各种偏见和关于美和简单性的先人之见，朝着理解宇
5宙结构这一重要方向取得了重大进展，比我们马上就
要谈到的清醒的爱奥尼亚“自然哲学家”和精神上继
承他们的原子论者所取得的进展都大。 ”（本书 39
页）——这完全为 2200 年后的 1609-1619 年开普勒
行星三定律宇宙“万物皆数”的宇宙和谐得到千古证
明——历史铭记的正是薛定谔的《自然与希腊人科学
与人文主义》，她回答了我们人类“为什么要回到古
代思想” ，找到了人类自然科学的开天鼻祖古希腊自
公元前 600 年之毕达哥拉斯学派发展到公元前 387 年
的“柏拉图学院”……是啊！薛定谔和现代西方科学
家一致确认，古希腊是人类自然科学的唯一起源，不
受古希腊人文主义影响的其他任何国家地区，都不足
以独自诞生现代科学！
那么，薛定谔系统阐述了以毕达哥拉斯学派为主
之科学、宇宙“万物皆数”的宇宙和谐又如何诞生呢!?
又如何产生柏拉图的“洞穴理论”和康德的不可知论
呢？同时强调德谟克里特的宇宙“原子论” ，尽管原
子论观点可能来自于“稀释和凝聚”……并最后列举
赫拉克利特理论：既然一切知识都是以感官为基础，
那么这些感官知觉必定先天地具有同等价值，不论它
们出现在醒时、梦中还是幻觉中；薛定谔深入研究深
刻解释说： “我们并不属于科学为我们构建的物质世
6界，我们不在其中而是在其外……”这里的一切，都
隐含在 1926 年薛定谔创立“波动力学”的奇妙之处
— — 2022 年 诺 贝 尔 物 理 学 奖 重 磅 公 布 ， Alain
Aspect、John F. Clauser 和 Anton Zeilinger 获
奖，以表彰他们对纠缠光子进行的实验，证明了“爱
因斯坦错误”对贝尔不等式的违反和开创性的量子信
息科学。
托勒密开拓了科学简单性原则： “在解释各种现
象的时候寻用一种能够把各种事实统一起来的最简
单的假说仍是一条正路。 ”希腊人早期研究是现代科
学发展座右铭，托勒密集成毕达哥拉斯学派“万物皆
数”的宇宙本源，开创了“对点”【后相对论方法论】
真实再现和初始顿悟应用宇宙星球万物的量子纠缠
属性！……
最后，让我们带着无限崇敬的心情，对世界最伟
大的物理学家薛定谔科学巨擘留给人类“波动力学”
和神奇的“量子纠缠”等科学前沿……表述最诚挚的
敬意与衷心感谢！谢谢！并让我们带着无比虔诚之心，
遵循《自然与希腊人科学与人文主义》伟大路径走进
古希腊自然科学“儿童期”的真实历史记载、去认真
研究一部 5000 年世界性改写唯物主义之物质与意识
量子纠缠、肉体与灵魂统一的经典史记、去实践一部
7世纪性宇宙大爆炸整体生命学的伟大宣言吧！
赵大庆 强燕平
2004 年 11 月 1 日初稿
2023 年 1 月 21 日修改
第一章 自然科学历史“后相对论”古希腊认识论起
源与人类自然科学（儿童期）希腊人初建自然科学金
字塔辉煌成为全人类现代自然科学第一基石功垂千
古
题记：什么是整体扳块遗传律？
效法莱布尼茨易 0、1 创建世界第一台计算机
对马歇尔基因密码表仿易 0、1 加密，发现密码隔行
对应变化基因数理不是线性数理整合呈现四模块 8 种
形式 16 组分模块 N 维立体之整体扳块运行模式即称
基因整体扳块遗传律（封底表乃后相对论认识）。
一、托勒密开创“对点”揭秘宇宙大爆炸行星量子纠
缠起源之“后相对论”认识论
人类科学前沿发展奇迹辉煌出现在古希腊爱琴
海，她是古希腊文明的摇篮，5000 年人类文明史恰恰
是古希腊文明一直延续到现代的圣果。人类没有起
8源、没有进化、更没有骗人的“从猿到人”！“现代
人”原本就是古希腊人的后裔，经过 5000 年特别是
古希腊科学高度文明、超群发展 5000 年至今的编年
史证实：克里特文明带动整个欧洲文明，公元前 1200
年《荷马史诗》是古希腊时代辉煌的残酷标记，希腊
人用腓尼基字母创造了自己的文字，公元前 776 年希
腊人彰显健美运动而举办了第一届奥运会；希波战争
使古希腊发展达到巅峰本开始神秘消失！其后五世纪
马其顿迅速崛起、亚历山大帝国复兴、罗马军团入侵
奏响了古希腊文明的挽歌，罗马人却延续了古希腊文
明的精华；雅典崛起，西班牙紧随其后成为最强大的
城邦，十三世纪的 1299 年罗姆苏丹国灭亡，奥斯曼
一世带领族人宣布独立、土耳其人建立的多民族帝国
因创立者为奥斯曼一世而得名（1923 年一战战败，奥
斯曼帝国也宣布了解体）；十五世纪鼎盛之时的西班
牙帝国，在海外殖民地的掠夺和对欧洲大陆的控制都
是绝对的新霸主；万物统一的概念是希腊精神的一个
典型特征，为现代人类留下了宝贵的精神与科学财
富、古希腊“城邦”治高效诞生了群星灿璀无数科学
圣贤功不可没，西方科学历史彰显古希腊文明延续至
今才形成了今天的“现代人”高度文明的自然科学鼎
盛！——然而，科学历史学家奇怪百思不解的是：为
9什么古希腊奇迹文明在短短的一个多世纪就神秘消
失了呢？
古希腊科学家自公元前 625 年伟大科学家泰勒士
（梭伦 、奇伦 、毕阿斯 、庇塔库斯、佩里安德、
克莱俄布-古希腊七贤以来）、苏格拉底、托勒密、
柏拉图、毕达哥拉斯、亚里士多德、阿基米德、欧几
里得、埃拉托色尼等等……为前所未有的“城邦”高
度文明建树了史无前例的伟大辉煌与高度发展崛起
的自然科学巨人前沿；才有意大利文艺复兴时期的达
芬奇和伽利略等伟人科学家都以阿基米德做自己的
楷模；可谓“理论天才与实验天才合于一人的理想化
身”！突现最完美的科学家阿基米德在(公元前 287
年—公元前 212 年)一生就写出了《论球和圆柱》、
《圆的度量》、《抛物线求积》、《论螺线》、《论
锥体和球体》、《沙的计算》等数学著作。作为力学
家，他着有《论图形的平衡》、《论浮体》、《论杠
杆》、《原理》等力学著作，史称“撬动地球的人（第
一科学家）” ，阿基米德延续泰勒斯众古希腊科学家
创立了【“后相对论”的认识论】，成为 5000 年全
人类科学历史发展前仆后继倚重的科学方法论——
这里， “对点”方法论原理之古希腊唯一标志是托勒
密开创的“对点”量子属性天球测算原理：【“对点”
10假如地球位于离开一个给定圆周之圆心有一定距离
的点上， “对点”则为地球位置的镜像，位于圆心的
另一边，该点与圆心的距离与圆心与地球的距离相
等，然后他用这个点来定义圆周上的运动，圆周上的
点不是匀速运动，而是以变速运动，速度变化的规律
是，让一个在“对点”上的观测看来是匀速运动的。
因此， “对点”的设置对天体运动必是匀速圆周运动
这一古希腊原则的冒犯。但是显然，托勒密考虑得更
多的是精确行星位置预报和数学上的便利，而不是真
实与否的问题。】这里，观察者为一“点” ，另一个
“点”在任意星球“给定圆周之圆心有一定距离的
点” ，与任意“一个在‘对点’（地球）上的观测者
‘点’”——产生地球上观测者与宇宙任意星球“量
子纠缠”式互动，就可以观测和数学计算得到宇宙地
球、任意恒星、行星、星系上大数据……这种纠缠的
两个“点”的星系数据乃托勒密开创和真实表达了应
用宇宙星球万物的量子纠缠属性之“后相对论”宇宙
认识论先河；从托勒密《至大论》中可以看到，历史
性地结合了阿波罗尼乌斯和希帕恰斯的偏心圆、本
轮、均轮……完成了从数学上认定星空的“周日旋转”
运动是地球绕自转轴的周日运动的反映……-“对点”
相当于相对性原理：无论是谁在地球、月球、其他的
11银河系，或者任何运动状态下，它都是不变的。无论
谁从什么样的角度来看待物理学，物理法则都不会发
生变化——这种“后相对论”宇宙认识论一直应用延
续到 14 世纪，一直到伽利略才提出“伽利略相对性
原理”延续到 21 世纪，其精深奥秘只有得到 21 世纪
20 年代三位科学家诺贝尔奖在实验上验证贝尔不等
式的违背，从而证明了量子力学的完备性并揭晓——
“后相对论宇宙认识论”灵魂的唯一永恒！
二、宇宙大爆炸原力是“量子纠缠”初始就存在
的微观量子“纠缠”本原
宇宙始于一个“奇点”大“爆炸” ，爆炸需要超巨级能
量才能在一个奇点产生大爆炸，量子是宇宙之间运化万物的
唯一能量子，超级聚集在一个点上即发生宇宙大爆炸（人永
远看不见的微观能量子），量子即原力，【大爆炸后 10-35
秒：约 1027 度，暴涨期（第一推动），引力已分离，夸克、
玻色子、轻子形成。此阶段宇宙已经冷却到强相互作用可以
分离出来，而弱相互作用及电磁相互作用仍然统一于所谓电
弱相互作用。
宇宙开始发生暴涨，暴涨仅持续了 10-33 秒，在此瞬间，
宇宙经历了 100 次加倍（2100），得到的尺度是先前尺度的
1030 倍（暴涨的是宇宙本身，即空间与时间本身，并不违反
12光速藩篱）。暴涨前宇宙还在光子的相互联系范围内，可以
平滑掉所有粗糙的点，暴涨停止时，今天所探测的东西已经
在各自小区域稳定下来，而这被称为暴涨理论。
大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，粒子期，质子和中子
及其反粒子形成，玻色子、中微子、电子、夸克以及胶子稳
定下来……】也就是说，在“大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015
度，粒子期，质子和中子及其反粒子形成” ，在“10-33 秒，
在此瞬间，宇宙经历了 100 次加倍（2100），得到的尺度是
先前尺度的 1030 倍”——根据“量子纠缠”是在量子力学
中处于纠缠态的两个或多个粒子，即便分开很远距离，有些
状态也会表现得像是一个整体的原力，人类长期以来无法解
释为什么量子纠缠可以超越光速，并且不需要介质（超距作
用）就可以相互影响——用今天物理的语言来说：对于一个
处于纠缠态的多粒子系统，其量子态函数不能分解成各个部
分的量子态的乘积。通俗的讲，量子纠缠指的是在空间上分
开的两个或多个粒子，由于某种相互作用，使得各个粒子所
拥有的信息或物理性质成为了整体特性而无法分离，这就是
为何称为“纠缠”。
宇宙大爆炸一开始（大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，
粒子期）大爆炸就运用量子纠缠创造了一种不可分割的整体
和一种隐含的秩序-宇宙万物，并证明原力是“量子纠缠”
13初始存在的微观量子本原。量子纠缠，就是在两个分隔的超
距粒子或者多个粒子，在彼此相互作用时，由于各个粒子所
拥有的特性完全综合成为整体性质，在大爆炸以后过程中一
般观测者实验无法单独描述各个粒子的性质；鉴此，托勒密
的“对点”设置，不惜冒犯对天体运动必是匀速圆周运动的
古希腊原则，开启了宇宙星球“圆周变速运动”先河，是一
场史无前例的“后相对论”宇宙认识论大革命……
三、托勒密用“对点”为全世界人类科学金字塔宇宙“万
物皆数”量子应用奠基
2003 年我们在《给你创新的支点》开篇强调：5000
年以来人类“科学的金字塔和社会发展中历史王朝的权利宝
座完全不同，它一经建立就永远不会坍塌，它无须用暴力像
推翻腐朽的权利宝座那样从朝代更迭来实现自己的发展。科
学史上每一次创新，都在构筑着人类科学金字塔的基础，都
会使人类科学金字塔变得更宏伟，更高大，更辉煌，这是永
无休止继往开来的宏伟、高大与辉煌。”——《给你创新的
支点》第二页
我们说，人类科学金字塔的宏伟、高大、辉煌恰恰是
古希腊泰勒斯以来众多科学巨擘突破天机前仆后继地伟大
创举。所以形成“永无休止继往开来的宏伟、高大与辉煌”！
事实上，在公元 127 年，托勒密不惜冒犯对天体运动必是匀
14速圆周运动的古希腊原则，开启了宇宙星球“圆周变速运动”
先河，并观测详细地给出了太阳、月亮和星三、火星、水行
星运动的数学理论。通过对每个行星的运动提供细节，做出
了最原始的贡献；堪称一场史无前例的“后相对论”宇宙认
识论大革命，志在高远且维护柏拉图、亚里士多德前辈来之
不易的“万物皆数”科学成果。
古希腊罗马时期的数学、天文学、物理学、生物学、
原子论、宇宙观、农业学、地理学、医学成就辉煌，对近代
学特别是现代所有科学领域的发展贡献巨大，可谓前无古人
后无来者！……这就是为什么托勒密发现了天球膸圆轨道
“圆周变速运动” ，却依然保留柏拉图、亚里士多德的地球
静止说，初衷是用古希腊众多科学家群体塑造全世界人类科
学金字塔牢不可破，传承千秋万代的金字塔基石啊！
四、托勒密地球静止历史性却长期传承人类科学
“后相对论宇宙认识论”科学金字塔大宇宙格局
《至大论》是托勒密天文观测记录，最早的日期
为公元 127 年 3 月 26 日，最晚的日期为 141 年 2 月 2
日，托勒密所有天文观测都是在埃及（当时在罗马帝
国统治之下）的亚历山大城完成的，并延续了塞翁（他
的老师）数学家观测天文记录和先哲亚里士多德地心
轮；这是一种历史性【“后相对论”的认识论】自然
15人科学人文主义传承：虽然，托勒密假设宇宙是以地
球为中心的、以及所有天体以均匀的速度按完全圆形
的轨道饶转的前提下，试图解释天体太阳系的运动。
并运用“对点”已经知道，实际天体以“圆周变速”
度按椭圆轨道饶地球以外的中心运动，为了维护来自
柏拉图-亚里士多德历史的基本假设，就必须考虑某
些非常复杂的几何形状。于是，托勒密使用了 3 种复
杂的原始设想：本轮、偏心圆和均轮。——“地心轮”
最早是亚里士多德提出的，托勒密继承了亚里士多德
地心轮并利用前人积累和他自己长期观测得到的数
据，完成了 8 卷本的《至大论》。在书中，托勒密把
亚里士多德的 9 层天扩大为 11 层，把原动力天改为
晶莹天，又往外添加了最高天和净火天……托勒密设
想完全是后相对论的认识论各行星都绕着一个较小
的圆周上运动，而每个圆的圆心则在以地球为中心的
圆周上运动，由近及远地按照月亮，水星，金星、太
阳、火星、木星、土星、最后是恒星天球的顺序，安
排了托勒密“地心说”（也叫静度说）宇宙结构——
这就是地心轮的历史渊源。
为什么托勒密的天体模型能流行 1300 年，就在
于科学历史传承“后相对论”认识论特点：
161、绕着某一中心的匀角速运动圆周变速椭圆轨
道，历史性地符合占主导地位的柏拉图的假设，并适
合亚里士多德的物理学。
2、用几种圆周轨道不同的组合预言了行星的运
动位置，能对火星、金星和水星等等的轨道分别给出
合理的描述与实际相差很小，并可很好解释行星的亮
度变化。
3、地球不动的说法，完全符合基督教信仰和教
皇意志。
五、哥白尼天球“日心论”并没有改变托勒密天
文学【“后相对论”的认识论】金字塔基石而是演化
出宇宙完美的椭圆轨道与宇宙和谐艺术
1300 年后的 1453 年，哥白尼耗尽毕生精力出版
了《天体运行论》（哥白尼抚摸着《天体运行论》闭
上了双眼，安详离开了这个世界）。这里，对宇宙天
球的观测完全延续了托勒密大数据，只不过修正了地
球旋转中心变成太阳为中心，仅此而已——其实，恢
复“日心论”在古希腊这是迟早的事儿；因为在古希
腊最早提出日心说，是在公元前 3 世纪古希腊的天文
学家阿利斯塔克（Aristarchus，公元前 310 年—公
17元前 230 年），认为行星以太阳为中心沿圆轨道运转，
地球每年绕日运行一周，地球每天在自己的轴上自转
一周，最外面是恒星；事实上，阿利斯塔克、托勒密
和哥白尼观测的是大自然同一个宇宙天体运行客观
体，都是宇宙大爆炸 138 亿年后呈现在人类的宇宙运
动生态，这种宇宙不会在 1300 年内出现既是绕地心
旋转。又是绕日心旋转的宇宙；也就是说，阿利斯塔
克、托勒密和哥白尼观测宇宙大数据是统一的宇宙，
问题的关键存在的乌笼在教皇——科学家只有等待
【“后相对论”的认识论】成为人类科学金字塔的神
灵之灵光一现，才能出现哥白尼……其实，哥白尼的
的理论中太阳不是正好位于行星圆轨道的中心，而是
偏离圆心，又没有继承托勒密的椭圆轨道，日心体系
中太阳静止不动，充其量称为“日静说” ，这里，始
终没有离开柏拉图和亚里士多德的“静”字。何也？！
——
科学历史还需要等待【“后相对论”的认识论】
人类科学金字塔再一次灵光一现，等待 1609 年-1619
年出现德国天文学家开普勒三定律证明宇宙和谐艺
术论！……
18六、亚里士多德百科全书特别是物理学为什么能统治
人类科学历史 2000 多年不衰而成为现代科学基础这
得益托勒密开创的【“后相对论”的认识论】
古希腊科学辉煌的重要且唯一标志乃科学巨人
大师亚里士多德，其百科全书式辉煌著作涉及伦理
学、形而上学、心理学、经济学、神学、政治学、修
辞学、自然科学、教育学、诗歌、风俗，以及雅典法
律；亚里士多德的著作构建了西方哲学的第一个广泛
系统，包含道德、美学、逻辑和科学、政治和玄学等
等……亚里士多德建立了第一个广泛的科学系统，其
中包含了前所未有的众多学科。亚里士多德科学研究
广范围和深刻、逻辑方法之精深，达到古希腊科学金
字塔最高峰、科学成就和智慧是史无前例的……亚里
士多德包罗万象的科学著作统治人类科学历史 2000
多年不衰而流传至今，完全得益托勒密“数”与“对
点”开创的量子【“后相对论”的认识论】——这种
“后相对论”认识论不间断地提升人类科学金字塔高
峰，并使古希腊的观测科学得到升华，达到金字塔辉
煌鼎盛！
那么，亚里士多德为什么认为雨点大小会不会同
时落地呢！？
19公元前 300 多年前，古希腊科学大师从泰勒士、
柏拉图、亚里士多德一直延续了 观测经验认识论，
最终导致亚里士多德认为： “从高空落下的物体，重
的要比轻的落得快!” ，也就是说，大雨点先落地、
小雨点后落地！： “物体下落的快慢是由物体本身的
重量决定的，物体越重，下落得越快；反之，则下落
得越慢。 ”亚里士多德重力准则理论影响了后世两千
多年的人类。
3000 年以来，古希腊科学都是观测科学，发展到
了前所未有的高峰；科学理论结论多出自亚里士多德
智慧，经过托勒密《至大论》的修饰，依然存在一些
瑕癖，1543 年得到哥白尼“日心论”的升华。其后的
1591 年，伽利略在《论运动》中，曾多次提到物体从
塔上落下的实验，并对同时落地做出了自己的解释。
伽利略进一步凭借数学的推理，将落体实验转化成斜
面实验，精确地测量路程和时间的关系把比萨斜塔实
验结论化；伽利略在 1636 年的《两种新科学的对话》
中写道：
“如果依照亚里士多德的理论，假设有两块石
头，大的重量为 8，小的为 4，则大的下落速度为 8，
小的下落速度为 4，当两块石头被绑在一起的时候，
20下落快的会因为慢的而被拖慢。所以整个体系和下落
速度在 4-8 之间。但是，两块绑在一起的石头的整体
重量为 12，下落速度也就应该大于 8，这就陷入了一
个自相矛盾的境界。 ”比萨斜塔实验开创了人类科学
历史“实验科学”先河、伟大科学里程碑——伽利略
开创“实验科学”极大丰富了人类科学金字塔底蕴和
向上升腾的空间……才开始走出现代实验科学的天
和地！
七、亚里士多德的惯性定律与伽利略惯性定律碰
撞产生实验科学伟大新纪元突显“后相对论”认识论
使人类科学金字塔不断跃上峰巅
《至大论》导言中托勒密论述了不能把地球看作
是运动着的星体，仅数学解释说——如果地球从西向
东旋转，我们应该可以看到地球上所有的东西向西移
动，而不应与地球紧紧相随，这同样出自亚里斯多德
的“惯性定律” ，托勒密又用的本轮系巧妙说明相传
了 1300 年；在物理学方面，亚里士多德定律认为：
“各物体只有在一个不断作用着的推动者直接接触
下，才能够保持运动。 ”——亚里士多德惯性定律在
古希腊科学史上标志着一个转折点，是第一个从事广
泛经验考察达到颠覆的科学大师，这一物理学定律是
21亚里士多德从日常经验得出的粗浅结论,尚没有经过
严格的实验科学检验，科学历史必然存在一个向实验
突破的问题……于是，人类科学金字塔必然出现跳跃
性升华：
1590 年伽利略的比萨斜塔实验证明雨点大小同
时落地后，又做了斜面理想实验——伽利略通过斜面
理想实验证明了在一个光滑的水平面上,小球不需要
力就能永远运动下去,所以力是改变物体运动状态的
原因,而不是维持物体运动的原因。 按照伽利略惯
性定律,一个物体在不受力或受到平衡力的条件下,
如果物体本来静止,物体就会继续保持静止;如果物
体本来有一个运动速度,那么它会继续以该速度一直
运动下去——也就是说，亚里士多德定律“各物体只
有在一个不断作用着的推动者直接接触下，才能够保
持运动。 ”只是强调了“推动者直接接触下，才能够
保持运动。 ”而忽略了“一个物体在不受力或受到平
衡力的条件下,如果物体本来静止,物体就会继续保
持静止; ”的“静止态”和“加速度”的科学细分而
伽利略对运动基本概念，包括重心、速度、加速度等
都作了详尽研究并给出了严格的数学表达式。尤其是
加速度概念的提出，在力学史上是一个里程碑。有了
加速度的概念，力学中的动力学部分才能建立在科学
22基础之上，而在伽利略之前，只有亚里士多德之静力
学部分有定量的描述。伽利略还对物体在斜面上的运
动，抛射体的运动等做过实验和观察。在这些研究基
础上他提出了加速度的概念及其数学表达式，并提出
惯性定律和物体在外力作用下运动的规律，破天荒第
一次提出惯性参考系（惯性系）的概念和提出运动相
对性原理“伽利略相对性”为牛顿正式提出牛顿第一
定律、牛顿第二定律奠定了基础；极大地稳固和相上
扩展了苏格拉底、柏拉图、亚里士多德到托勒密开创
的人类科学金字塔基座与之巅的辉煌！
八、 “伽利略相对性”原理是托勒密“对点”【“后
相对论”的认识论】灵光一现在哥白尼地动说的深
刻顿悟并确认了“后相对论”认识论在经典力学无
法颠覆的统治
“伽利略相对性原理”又名： “力学相对性原理”
即：经典力学定律在任何惯性参考系（惯性系）中数
学形式不变，简曰，所有惯性系都是等价（平权）的。
科学历史是这样延续发展的：伽利略用物理学原
理为哥白尼地动学说进行辩解时，应用运动独立性原
理通俗说明了石子从桅杆顶上掉落到桅杆脚下而不
向船尾偏移的道理。进一步以作匀速直线运动的船舱
2324
中物体运动规律不变的著名论述，破天荒第一次提出
惯性参考系（惯性系）的概念。这一原理被爱因斯坦
称为伽利略相对性原理，是狭义相对性原理的先导。
从伽利略变换可以导出力学相对性原理。推导：
设有两个参考系 S(Oxyz)及 S'(O'x'y'z')，坐标轴相互平
行且轴 x 与轴 x'重合，S'相对 S 沿 x 轴以 u 做等速直线运动，
且 S 系与 S'系中各处有结构完全相同的时钟，记录的时刻为
t 与 t'，并以两坐标原点 O 及 O'重合时刻为计时起点，则可
得某质点 m 的运动在两参考系中的时空变换关系：
x'=x－ut
y'=y
z'=z
t'=t
上式即为伽利略（坐标）变换。如果将各式对时间求导，
则得速度变换式：
vx'=vx－u
vy'=vy
vz'=vz
因此，如果 S 是惯性系，即不受外力作用的物体在其中做
等速直线运动，则根据上式，它在 S'中也一定做等速直线运
动，所以 S'也是惯性系。如果将各式再一次对时间求导，则
得加速度变换关系式：
ax'=ax
ay'=ay
az'=az25
亦即 a'=a。因此如果 S 是惯性系，即在其中 F=ma 成立，
则在 S'中也有 F=ma'，所以 S'也是惯性系。这样就从伽利略
变换导出了力学相对性原理。
[1]
九、从伽利略到牛顿三定律极大地稳固扩展了苏
格拉底、柏拉图、亚里士多德到托勒密开创的人类科
学金字塔基座壮阔峰顶千古不断跃升
“自然和自然规律都隐藏在黑暗的夜间，上帝
说： ‘让牛顿降生吧！于是一切都变得光明了。 ’”
——亚历山大.蒲珀
牛顿在 1687 年完成出版了划时代科学巨著《自然
哲学的数学原理》提出牛顿第一运动定律、牛顿第二
运动定律和牛顿第三运动定律三条定律。科学历史统
称“经典力学” ：
牛顿第一定律：一切物体总保持匀速直线运动
状态或静止状态，直到有外力迫使它改变这种状态为
止。
牛顿第二定律：物体的加速度 a 跟物体所受的
合外力 F 成正比，跟物体的质量 m 成反比，加速度的
方向跟合外力的方向相同.牛顿第三定律：两个物体之间的作用力和反作用力
总是大小相等，方向相反，作用在一条直线上。
牛顿运动定律中的各定律互相独立，且内在逻辑
符合自洽一致性。其适用范围是经典力学范围，适用
条件是质点、惯性参考系以及宏观、低速运动问题。
牛顿运动定律阐释了牛顿力学的完整体系，阐述了经
典力学中基本的运动规律，在各领域上应用广泛。
任何时候都可以这样说：如果没有苏格拉底、柏
拉图、亚里士多德到托勒密“对点”相对性原理，就
没有 1300 年后哥白尼的“日心论” ；如果没有哥白
尼“日心论” 、就永远没有伽利略去为哥白尼地动学
说进行辩解，就不能产生“伽利略相对性原理” ；如
果没有亚里士多德惯性定律，就永远不会有伽利略惯
性定律和后来的牛顿三定律，建成经典力学宏伟科学
金字塔的无比辉煌；如果没有伽利略相对性原理，就
不会有“洛伦茨变换”而诞生狭义相对论！……为什
么呢？
请看科学历史诠释：①、公元前 4 世纪，亚里士
多德公元前 384-公元前 322）指出：静止是物体的自
然状态，如果没有作用力就没有运动（力是维持物体
运动的原因）、②、公元 6 世纪， 希腊学者菲洛彭
26诺斯（J.Philoponus）对亚里士多德的运动学说提出
修亨正认为抛体本身具有某种动力，推动物体前进，
直到耗尽才趋于停止，提出静止概念、③、14 世纪，
法国哲学家布里丹（Jean Buridan，1295-1358？）、
阿尔伯特、尼克尔·奥里斯姆（Nicole Oresme，1320？
-1382）等人提出“冲力理论”认为： “推动者在推
动一物体运动时，便对它施加某种冲力或某种动力，
速度越大，冲力越大，冲力耗尽时，物体停止下来。 ”
④、17 世纪，伽利略在其的著作中多次提出类似于惯
性原理的说法。他分别于 1632 年和 1638 年，在《关
于托勒密和哥白尼两大世界体系的对话》和《关于力
学和位置运动的两门新科学的对话》中记录了理想斜
面实验、⑤、1644 年，法国物理学家勒内·笛卡尔（Rene
Descartes，1596-1650）在《哲学原理》中弥补了伽
利略的不足，明确地指出，除非物体受到外因的作用，
物体将永远保持其静止或运动状态，并且还特地声
明，惯性运动的物体永远不会使自己趋向曲线运动，
而只保持在直线上运动。⑥、1662 年，伽利略指出：
“以任何速度运动着的物体，只要除去加速或减速的
外因，此速度就可以保持不变。 ”笛卡尔也认为： “在
没有外加作用时，粒子或者匀速运动，或者静止。 ”
——也就是说，牛顿把上述假定作为牛顿第一运动定
27律，并将伽利略的思想进一步推广到有力作用的场
合，提出了牛顿第二运动定律；⑦、1673 年，法国物
理学家马里奥特（EdmeMarotte，1620-1684）用两个
单摆做碰撞实验，巧妙地测出了碰撞前后的瞬时速
度。牛顿也重复做了此实验，并进一步讨论了空气阻
力的影响及改进办法，并对结果进行了修正；⑧、1684
年 8 月起，在英国物理学家埃德蒙多·哈雷
（EdmondHalley，1656-1742）的劝说下，牛顿开始
写作《自然哲学的数学原理》，系统地整理手稿，重
新考虑部分问题。1685 年 11 月，形成了两卷专著。
1687 年 7 月 5 日，《原理》使用拉丁文出版。《原理》
的绪论部分中的运动的公理或定律一节中提出了牛
顿运动定律，摆脱了旧观念的束缚。⑨、解铃还须系
铃人，埃德蒙多·哈雷劝说牛顿写作完成《自然哲学
的数学原理》；又是哈雷使用牛顿的万有引力定律和
行星运动理论计算出了这些彗星的轨道，确认预言
1531 年、1607 年和 1682 年出现的三颗彗星是同一颗
彗星，每间隔 76 年的周期便会返回一次，并证明了
万有引力定律的经典正确宇宙地球普适。
十、【后相对论认识论】起源宇宙大爆炸在古希腊
3000 年城邦完善创建至高无上的人类科学金字塔
永不间断的万古辉煌
28那么，5000 年至今什么是“后相对论”的认识论
呢？
为了形象生动地认识理解“后相对论” ，我们看
一个不死不活的诡秘的“猫”——“薛定谔猫” ：
在一个封闭的盒子里装有一只猫和一个与放射
性物质相连的释放装置。在一段时间之后，放射性物
质有可能发生原子衰变，通过继电器触发释放装置，
放出毒气，也有可能不发生衰变，因此依据常识，这
只猫或是死的，或是活的？是确定的、又不是确定的！
这就是量子力学“测不准原理”初衷。是活猫、还是
死猫这需要时间；短则数小时数天、多则几年、甚至
几十年——时间等待“毒气”释放猫死亡、或者不发
生衰变猫活下去——死猫、活猫都是确定的，只有时
间和等待是不确定的两相重叠，表现出“量子纠缠”
时空本能属性！
结论：舍去时间、等待空间，只有猫死了或者活
着出来后才有确定性——这就是相对论后的相对论-
“后相对论”认识论的唯一（确定性）结论！
用量子力学中通用“测不准”原理的解释，波包
塌缩依赖于观察，观察需要时间和等待……等待过
29程，这只猫应处于不死不活的迭加态，这种叠加态是
相对的，凸显出这种解释的困境和不可知的测不准原
理——这是宇宙根本无法摆脱之“量子纠缠”困境，
只有时间能抹平似乎并不能填平的“量子纠缠”鸿沟；
不打开箱子，就不知道猫的状态，猫有可能已经死去，
也有可能放射物质没有变化，猫仍然好好的或者已经
中毒死去。这种常识与微观特异性之间的“量子纠缠”
鸿沟——等待和时间的长短程度是相对的，猫死与猫
活确定性由等待和时间的相对性后决定，只有打开箱
子，一切困惑消除。得到活与死猫的确定性！……这
就是相对论后的相对论-我们叫“后相对论”认识论！
十一、科学历史证明爱因斯坦运用“后相对论”
认识论发现“广义相对论”确认了古希腊 3000 年以
来人类科学金字塔丰碑最宝贵之思维方法论
科学历史事实是不可争辩的！“后相对论”认识
论是爱因斯坦发现广义相对论“后相对论”认识过程
的产物，广义相对论是“洛伦茨变换” ；发现狭义相
对论的历史必然(洛伦兹变换（Lorentz
transformation）是狭义相对论中两个作相对匀速运
动的惯性参考系（S 和 S′）之间的坐标变换， 是观
测者在（对点）不同惯性参考系之间对物理量进行测
30量时所进行的转换关系，在数学上表现为一套方程
组。洛伦兹变换因其创立者——荷兰物理学家 H·洛
伦兹而得名。洛伦兹变换最初用来调和 19 世纪建立
起来的经典电动力学同牛顿力学之间的矛盾，后来成
为狭义相对论中的基本方程组)；1905 年爱因斯坦发
现狭义相对论后，出现不能解释牛顿力，只得进一步
深入研究，经过十年研究，有一天，爱因斯坦突然灵
光一现： “自己跳下去感觉不到引力场” ，便用一个
“等效原理”完成了狭义相对论后之相对论-史称“广
义相对论”的发现——其本质是宇宙“后相对论”认
识论方法论的证伪！
鉴此， “后相对论”是爱因斯坦二元思维决定的
认识论；事实上，广义相对论对狭义相对论的本质，
就是爱因斯坦运用“后相对论”认识论解决万有引力
与狭义相对论矛盾的思维认识一种时空转圜。
1905 年爱因斯坦接过洛伦茨变换之狭义相对论
之后，在运用过程中，发现狭义相对论和万有引力存
在相悖，狭义相对论不能解释万有引力作用的引力物
理法则，无法把引力理论和相对论原理统一起来；只
好回过头来研究万有引力与狭义相对论的某种关联，
寻找切入点——爱因斯坦曾回忆说： “我一生中最快
31乐的思想……以下面的形式出现……对一个从屋顶
自由下落的人来说不存在——至少在紧靠着他的周
围环境中——引力场。 ”爱因斯坦用了十年时间刻骨
铭心的思维方法论，于 1915 年顿悟这种感觉不到“引
力场”变换为“等效原理”的本质即完成相对论后的
相对论认识论：狭义相对论后的广义相对论！（相当
于爱因斯坦不自觉地运用宇宙后相对论思维的等待
和时间研究的“后相对论”全过程）——科学历史自
古以来就证明：古希腊 3000 年以来自从托勒密发明
“对点”之“后相对论”认识论一直发展到 1915 年
爱因斯坦发现广义相对论后，自然而然确认了“后相
对论认识论”是人类科学金字塔丰碑最宝贵的多维方
法论！——可是啊！到此“后相对论”认识论仍然没
有完结不间断的争论！？却早已经成为人类历史撰记
的潜规则（世界所有历史都是后人按自己的意识撰写
的啊！）
十二、以玻尔为首的哥本哈根学派和爱因斯坦在索尔
维会议大论战诠释认定爱因斯坦“决定论”是完全错
误并得到 2022 年诺贝尔奖证明
1927 年，第五届索尔维会议在比利时布鲁塞尔
召开了，会议爆发了阿尔伯特·爱因斯坦与尼尔斯·玻
32尔两人的大辩论，这次索尔维峰会被冠之以“最著名”
的称号。索尔维会议（3-5 届会议）彰显哥本哈根诠
释（Copenhagen interpretation）是量子力学的一
种诠释。根据哥本哈根诠释，在量子力学里，量子系
统的量子态，可以用波函数来描述，这是量子力学的
一个关键特色，波函数是个数学函数，专门用来计算
粒子在某位置或处于某种运动状态的概率，测量的动
作造成了波函数坍缩，原本的量子态概率地坍缩成一
个测量所允许的量子态；虽然，爱因斯坦败下阵来仍
然死不承认，却说什么“上帝不扔色子” ，为“确定
性”辩护……
事实上，更激进的量子力学无情抛弃了爱因斯
坦经典的因果关系，哥本哈根诠释宣称人类并不能获
得实在世界的确定的结果！哥本哈根学派反反复复实
验证明：量子力学称自己只有由这次测量推测下一次
测量的各种结果的分布几率，而拒绝对事物在两次测
量之间的行为做出具体描述（后相对论的认识论）；
著名的“测不准原理”成为迄今为止相对论无法跨越
的理论屏障，历时 28 年的大辩论科学历史结论是无
情的！（尽管爱因斯坦生前从不认错）……
33尽管爱因斯坦等科学家在当时指出了量子力
学是“不完备性” ，甚至认为在未来会出现新的理论
代替量子力学！？然而，至今没有新理论诞生来替
代！……95 年以来，科学家面对爱因斯坦的“不完备
性” ，历经近百年时间人类科学家前仆后继进行研究
与科学实验一直没有间断，一直到 2022 年诺贝尔物
理学奖得到“爱因斯坦错了的结论”！
十三、从克劳泽到阿斯佩再到蔡林格，一代代
物理学家终于用确凿的实验数据证明，量子纠缠是真
实的存在胜利属于哥本哈根学派.
“量子纠缠”这个名词是薛定谔观看了爱因斯坦
的 EPR 佯谬后，对量子的叠加状态提出的名称；事实
上， “薛定谔猫”就是对“量子纠缠”最形象、最权
威、最诡异的实验与诠释。于是，就出现格利宾完全
赞成的多世界解释，认为猫死与猫活这两种结果分属
两个独立平行且真实存在的平行宇宙世界——瑞典皇
家科学院 2022 年 10 月 6 日颁发诺贝尔奖，再次褒奖了这一
领域的进步。三位物理学家各自使用“两个粒子即使在分离
时也表现得像一个单元”的纠缠量子态，进行了开创性实验，
证明了爱因斯坦、波多尔斯基和罗森的论文的 “荒谬”！
也就是说，当两个粒子分开任意大的距离时， “远距离的幽
34灵作用” ，在现实中似乎已经实现了：纠缠粒子对中的一个
粒子的状态，决定了另一个粒子的状态，即使这两个粒子相
距很远……且进一步证明“超距作用”是宇宙量子的真实作
用——粒子本身像一个点，但它的位置却像波一样散布在空
间里，描述这些波的函数被称作 “波函数 ”——【“对点”
假如地球位于离开一个给定圆周之圆心有一定距离的点上，
“对点”则为地球位置的镜像，位于圆心的另一边，该点与
圆心的距离与圆心与地球的距离相等，然后他用这个点来定
义圆周上的运动，圆周上的点不是匀速运动，而是以变速运
动，速度变化的规律是，让一个在“对点”上的观测看来是
匀速运动的。因此， “对点”的设置对天体运动必是匀速圆
周运动这一古希腊原则的冒犯。但是显然，托勒密考虑得更
多的是精确行星位置预报和数学上的便利，而不是真实与否
的问题。】就是这种 “波函数 ”在古希腊托勒密偶发的量
子数学应用。鉴此， “量子纠缠”现象自然始于 138 亿年宇
宙大爆炸，【大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，粒子期，质
子和中子及其反粒子形成，玻色子、中微子、电子、夸克以
及胶子稳定下来……】也就是说，在“大爆炸后 10-12 秒：
约 1015 度，粒子期，质子和中子及其反粒子形成” ，在“10-33
秒，在此瞬间，宇宙经历了 100 次加倍（2100），得到的尺
度是先前尺度的 1030 倍”——根据“量子纠缠”现代科学
定义，在量子力学中处于纠缠态的两个或多个粒子，即便分
35开很远距离，有些状态也会表现得像是一个整体的原力，人
类长期以来无法解释为什么量子纠缠可以超越光速，并且不
需要介质（超距作用）就可以相互影响——用今天物理的语
言来说：对于一个处于纠缠态的多粒子系统，其量子态函数
不能分解成各个部分的量子态的乘积。通俗的讲，量子纠缠
指的是在空间上分开的两个或多个粒子，由于某种相互作
用，使得各个粒子所拥有的信息或物理性质成为了整体特性
而无法分离，这就是为何称为“纠缠”。然而，在 1926 年
哥本哈根学派和爱因斯坦大辩论，爱因斯坦始终希望把量子
力学中的一些现象跟宏观世界中的一些现象对比，像贝尔不
等式就涉及到局域的实在性——爱因斯坦就用这种“局域
性”否定了牛顿经典力学。并批判和完全否定： “牛顿运动
定律在超出经典力学范围或质点、惯性参考系以及宏观、低
速运动问题等适用条件时，不再成立。”
那么，什么是“贝尔不等式”呢？
1964 年，John Bell 定义了一个可观测量，并基于局域
隐变量理论预言的测量值都不大于 2。而用量子力学理论，
可以得出大于 2 的测量值。一旦实验测量的结果大于 2，就
意味着局域隐变量理论是错误的——这就是“贝尔不等式” ；
它的原理是戴维·波姆在 1952 年，引入“隐变量” ，在局
36域实在论的基础上形成了一个完全决定性的理论——局域
隐变量理论。
戴维·波姆认为：是一种隐变量在操控整个量子世界中
那些看起来不可思议的事情……事实上，贝尔不等式定理的
实验验证是一个物理实验，旨在测试量子力学理论与局域隐
变量理论哪个正确？也就是说， “大于 2 的测量值”就不正
确（事实上，在量子力学领域测量值都是大于 2）！从克劳
泽到阿斯佩再到蔡林格，一代代物理学家终于用确凿的实验
数据证明，量子纠缠是真实的存在胜利属于哥本哈根学派！
十四、科学家必须回过头来重新审视“迈克尔逊-莫雷
实验”它同样是“完全决定性的理论——局域隐变量理论。”
的爱氏产物
“完全决定性的理论——局域隐变量理论。”导致贝尔
不等式不成立的实验，完全证明“量子纠缠”的客观存在。
于是，我们必须回过头来重新审视“迈克尔逊-莫雷实验”
同样是“完全决定性的理论——局域隐变量理论”。（探测
器是干涉仪）光束的加速或减速取决于它相对于以太风的运
动，这将导致干涉仪上的非对准。他们完全期待得出以太风
的速度值。然而，在进行的无数试验中，他们没有注意到检
测到的光速有任何差异。它总是等于 c——这里，我们强调：
“以太凤”是“完全决定性的理论——局域隐变量理论。”
37根本就不存在！——“风，是由空气流动引起的一种自然现
象，它是由太阳辐射热引起的。太阳光照射在地球表面上，
使地表温度升高，地表的空气受热膨胀变轻而往上升。热空
气上升后，低温的冷空气横向流入，上升的空气因逐渐冷却
变重而降落，由于地表温度较高又会加热空气使之上升，这
种空气的流动就产生了风。”（见《给你创新的支点》17
页图 6）可见，以太不能形成“以太风”……
“以太”一词是英文 Ether 或 Aether 的音译。最早由
古希腊哲学家亚里士多德提出，设想是普遍存在的一种物
质，内涵随物理学发展而演变。而在亚里士多德看来，物质
元素除了水、火、气、土之外，还有一种居于天空上层的以
太。以太的量子性在科学史上带有一种神秘色彩……
阿拉伯科学家阿尔.哈森的《光学大全》应用球面镜和
抛物面反射镜发现透镜的放大效应和大气折射，成为最早研
究光学的学者；惠更斯的“介质中任一处的波动状态是由各
处的波动决定的”并认为，以太又在很大程度上作为光波的
荷载物同光的波动学说相联系，后来发展到“波粒两重性”
之“测不准原理”。
光的波动说是由 R.胡克首先提出的，并为 C.惠更斯研
究进一步发展成“波动说” ，到了 17 世纪，笛卡尔进一步
丰富了“以太”内涵-法国数学家 R.笛卡尔建立了“以太旋
38涡说” ，用来解释太阳系内各行星的运动。笛卡尔的以太观
念，既推翻亚里士多德的“以太”虚拟假设，又丰富了未来
物理学想象空间；同时，荷兰 C.惠更斯和英国 R.胡克提倡
光的波动说，都假定空间具有无所不在的以太，成为波动真
实的存在。从 17 世纪以来， “以太”就改称“发光以太”
或“光以太”。——笛卡儿 1664 年完成《笛卡尔的人类哲
学》提出来“以太”观念，认为是一种真实存在的微观物质，
具有“超巨力”的微物质——从 2022 年 10 月诺贝尔物理学
奖三物理学家成就展示“超距作用”是存在的，表现为量子
纠缠。于是，以太就是量子！只不过在过去的 3000 年人类
科学家用光的波动说“以太”表达而已！……
对于“超巨力”的实验证明，最早出自法拉第《电学实
验研究》，提出穿越性“超距作用” ，颠覆了传统思维，成
为“超巨力”的“力线”。
法拉第有一个十分坚定的信念：法拉第确信世界是统
一、和谐的，无论是电、磁、光、热还是引力，都应当存在
着密切的联系。那么，神奇的光呢？当年法拉第跟随戴维游
历意大利时，观看过一位名叫莫里契尼的意大利科学家做的
实验……法拉第记忆犹新，则把这些透明导电的电解质放在
两个电极之间，给电极加上很高的电压，然后让一束偏振光
通过这个电解质；结果对偏振光没有反应而失败。法拉第又
39把导电的电解质换成不导电的电解质，如松脂，水晶、冰洲
石等等——法拉第在 1816 年有一段引人注目的论述。他说：
“重力的吸引作用、电的吸引作用和磁的吸引作用……看
来……足以解释我们所熟悉的所有自发的趋近和附着现
象……化学基于物质的内聚力和物体的亲和力，而无论是内
聚力还是亲和力都是吸引作用……聚集体的吸引与化学吸
引作用实际上与重力的吸引作用和电的吸引作用相同，我虽
然不能断然地确定，但我们相信它们是这样的。”也就是说，
以太的“超巨力”和“量子纠缠”的“超距作用”完全是相
同的，以太就是量子！科学历史完全证明“迈克尔逊-莫雷
实验”和“贝尔不等式实验”都是“非局域”实验；宇宙物
质超光速是真实的存在。
十五、宇宙“量子纠缠”超光速在量子力学是独一无二
的真实存在看人类科学金字塔“超光速”升华峰顶
对于， “超光速”爱因斯坦认为这种现象绝不会出现的，
并把这种现象称为幽灵般的超距作用，并称，问题源于“量
子力学是不完备的”。鉴此，爱因斯坦希望建立一个更普适
的局域实在论理论来弥补量子理论的不足，消除超距作用。
事实上， “超距作用”与粒子之间的距离无关；可以同时测
量，也可延迟测量，即超光速的；与空间环境无关，电磁屏
40蔽、引力屏蔽等都无法阻挡它们的关联，这就是处在纠缠态
的两个粒子之间的关联性，宇宙物质超光速是真实的存在。
人类科学金字塔形成的历史升华总是这样的相像:1915
年爱因斯坦说，牛顿运动定律在超出经典力学范围或质点、
惯性参考系以及宏观、低速运动问题等适用条件时，不再成
立。95 年后的 2022 年爱因斯坦在地下仍不得安宁，因为量
子力学中没有局域性，量子纠缠的“超距作用”“超光速”
就属于量子非局域——宇宙物质超光速是真实的存在“爱因
斯坦错了”！
今天，科学历史反思必须重新认识“迈克尔逊－莫雷
实验”(Michelson-Morley Experiment)——1887 年迈克尔
逊和莫雷在美国克利夫兰做的用迈克尔逊干涉仪测量两垂
直光的光速差值的一项著名的物理实验。但结果证明光速在
不同惯性系和不同方向上都是相同的，由此否认了以太（绝
对静止参考系）的存在，从而动摇了经典物理学基础，成为
近代物理学的一个开端——2022 年诺贝尔物理学奖却明明
白白用实验证明爱因斯坦错了！完全否定了“迈克尔逊莫雷
实验的目的是测试以太阳系为参考系时,是否有以太风,结
果发现在地面上,以装置为参考系,光速是不变的。 迈克耳
孙-莫雷实验 说明了在地面上光速不变。而任何物体都是运
动的,所以如光速不受参照系影响,则测出来光速应是改变
41的,而测出光速不变,正说明光是叠加了参照系的速度,而这
个速度是以太给予的,也说明了地面上以太与地球是同步运
动的。”
“900 年，开尔文勋爵在发表那个著名的《在热和光动
力理论上空的 19 世纪乌云》演说时提到，物理学的大厦已
经基本建成了，后辈物理学家只要做一些零碎的修补工作就
行了，只不过在物理学阳光灿烂的天空下，漂浮着“两朵小
乌云”。第一朵就是没有证明以太的存在，第二点是黑体辐
射理论和实际的不匹配。这两朵乌云一朵发展出了相对论，
另外一朵发展出量子力学。如果在当初实验后证明了以太是
存在的，那么爱因斯坦的相对论也就不会出现了——爱因斯
坦就认为量子纠缠这种超距相互作用是不可思议的，违背了
狭义相对论。
爱因斯坦与其在普林斯顿的助手 Boris Podolsky 和
Nathan Rosen 提出一个思想实验，就是著名的 EPR 佯谬。
EPR 佯谬描述了 A、B 为自旋 1/2 的粒子，初始总自旋为
零。假设粒子有两种可能的自旋，分别是|上>和|下>，那么，
如果粒子 A 的自旋为|上>，粒子 B 的自旋便一定是|下>，才
能保持总体守恒。如果这两个粒子朝相反方向飞奔，相距越
来越远。那么，无论相距多远，它们应该永远是|上>|下>关
联的，才能保持总体守恒。如果分别由观察者 Alice Bob 对
42两个粒子进行测量。根据量子力学的说法，只要 Alice 和 Bob
还没有进行测量，每一个粒子都应该处于某种叠加态，比如
说，|上>、|下>各为 50%概率的叠加态。然后，如果 Alice
对 A 进行测量，A 的叠加态便在一瞬间坍缩了，比如，坍缩
成了 |上>，因为守恒的缘故，B 就一定要为|下>。但是，此
时的 A 和 B 之间已经相隔非常遥远，比如说几万光年吧，按
照量子力学的理论，B 也应该是|上>和|下>各一半的概率，
为什么它能够做到总是选择|下>呢？除非 A 粒子和 B 粒子之
间有某种方式及时地“互通消息”？即使假设它们能够互相
感知，那也似乎是一种超距瞬时的信号！而这超距作用又是
与相对论中光速不可超越相违背。于是，这就构成了佯谬。
爱因斯坦认为这种现象绝不会出现的，并把这种现象称
为幽灵般的超距作用，并称，问题源于“量子力学是不完备
的”。爱因斯坦希望建立一个更普适的局域实在论理论来弥
补量子理论的不足，消除超距作用。
而玻尔认为，这个超距离作用必定存在，量子力学是完
备的；量子世界是非局域的。于是，1926 年玻尔和爱因斯坦
大论战继续跨世纪展开：
1964 年，作为爱因斯坦的追随者的贝尔（John Bell）
定义了一个可观测量，并基于局域隐变量理论预言的测量值
43都不大于 2。一旦实验测量的结果大于 2，就意味着局域隐
变量理论是错误的。这被成为“贝尔定理” 、 “贝尔不等式”。
贝尔不等式的诞生，宣告了量子力学理论的局域性争
议，从哲学色彩纯粹思辨变进入实验可证伪的科学理论:
1969 年，当时还是哥伦比亚大学研究生的 John
Clauser，和 Michael Horne、Abner Shimony 和 Richard Holt
一起，通过被称为 Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt(CHSH)不等
式，将前述贝尔 1964 年的数学定理转化为一个非常具体的
实验预测。
1972 年，John Clauser 已经是博士后研究员了，他和
研究生 Stuart Freedman 第一个用实验证明了两个相距很远
的粒子可以纠缠在一起。
John Clauser 继续进行了另外三个实验，以测试量子力
学和纠缠的基础。每个新实验都证实并扩展了他的结果。
1982 年，Alan Aspect 等人在巴黎第十一大学改进
Clauser 和 Freedman 贝尔定理实验，利用在钙离子级联辐射
出的光子对之间的偏振态的纠缠，实验结果违反“贝尔不等
式”。
441998 年，Anton Zeilinger 等人在奥地利因斯布鲁克大
学完成“贝尔不等式”实验，利用非线性晶体中参量下转换
产生的纠缠光子对，部分地排除定域性漏洞，实验结果具有
决定意义。
【随后，多年来大家还是通过各种各样的纠缠例子对，
验证贝尔不等式，是因为之前实验存在的不完美和漏洞，例
如局域性漏洞、测量漏洞。
所谓局域性漏洞，就是指纠缠粒子之间关联的相应时间
超越光速，比如对一个粒子探测得到结果，另外一个粒子的
结果也就瞬间得到，但是如果两个粒子之间距离不够长，不
足以证明通过光速传播的时间，是远远长于实验上得到另一
个光子结果的时间，这就存在局域性漏洞。
而测量漏洞则是因为探测器效率不是 100%，所以可以理
解为探测到的粒子都违背贝尔不等式，而没有探测到的粒子
是不违背的。
2015 年，荷兰 Delft 技术大学的 Ronald Hanson 研究组，
报道了他们在金刚石色心系统中完成的验证贝尔不等式的
实验：要避免局域性漏洞，只需把两个金刚石色心放置在相
距 1.3 公里的两个实验室。两个色心直接用光通讯所需时间
大概 4.27 微秒，而完成一次实验的时间为 4.18 微秒，比光
45通信时间少 90 纳秒，因此解决了局域性漏洞。此外，色心
的测量效率高达 96%，测量漏洞也被堵上了。他们声称实现
了无漏洞的验证贝尔不等式的实验，在 96%的置信度（2.1
个标准差）上支持量子理论，从而证伪了局域的隐变量理论。
在实验中，他们利用纠缠光子对和纠缠交换技术，实现了金
刚石色心电子之间的纠缠。】——《诺奖解读｜薛鹏：从爱
因斯坦不相信到幽灵般超距作用成真》
宇宙超光速在量子力学是独一无二的真实存在，2022
年诺贝尔物理学奖彰显：人类科学金字塔爱因斯坦不承认的
“超光速”得到实验证明升华跃上金字塔峰顶！——“量子
纠缠”将完全改变世界物质与灵魂说——肉体与灵魂是生命
独有存在的统一与游离量子属性，灵魂往往游离在肉体之外
遥在天际，就像神学那样灵魂可以超度、神乎其神……可是
啊！肉体与灵魂本是一个整体生命学现象，仿佛“量子纠缠” ，
同样起源 138 亿年的宇宙大爆炸！于是，人类就进入到诡异
的“整体生命学六界”……
十六、整体生命学起源宇宙大爆炸希腊人先知先觉创造
整体生命学和拓展现代医学“整体性”是不争是事实
整体生命学和人类所有科学一样，都是从古希腊奇迹文
明开始、延续至今： 古希腊生物学家当属哲学家阿那克西
曼德（公元前 610—前 545），古希腊唯物主义哲学家，据
46传是“哲学史第一人”泰勒斯的学生，最再的生物学家。曾
断言，最早的原始动物生活在海中，海最初是覆盖了整个地
表的。当海水下降，一些生物体能够使自己适应新环境，便
成为陆地动物。 自从托勒密“对点”揭示宇宙星球的量子
属性和开创数学计算、经验观察科学研究并制定了行之有效
的古希腊科学简单性原则成为主流， 亚里士多德
(Aristotle 公元前 384～前 322)，史称，人类生物科学之父；
著有多卷《动物学志》，毕生观察、研究动物结构、习性和
成长和各种昆虫的变形、鳗鱼的生殖习惯、弓鳍鱼的胚胎发
展等等……描述了数百种动物，建树人类科学第一部动物学
理论； 希波克拉底（公元前 460 年——前 370 年）为古希
腊伯里克利时代的医师，被西方尊为“医学之父” ，西方医
学奠基人，提出“体液学说” ，成为西方医学奠基大师，为
人类留下《希波克拉底誓言》是希波克拉底警诫人类的古希
腊职业道德，直至现代医学职业道德圣典！ 克劳迪亚斯·盖
伦（Claudius Galenus，129 年-199 年）是仅次于希波克拉
底（Hippocrates）的第二个医学权威，一生专心研究医疗
实践解剖，撰写了超过 500 部医书，并根据古希腊体液说提
出了人格类型的概念，主要作品有《气质》《本能》《关于
自然科学的三篇论文》——上述古希腊科学大师的生命科学
理论就构成现代人类“整体生命学”理论核心 在公元前四
百年左右，大哲学家柏拉图的理论就确定“地球是一巨大活
47生物体”——这就是人类科学“整体生命学”之源！更久远
的古希腊神话传说：地球就是女神盖亚的化身、众神之母，
是所有神灵中德高望重的显赫之神，盖亚在裂缝（chaos）
中诞生，是第一位超原始神明，标志着“冲突与混乱来自于
万神之母盖亚，也正是这位大母神生出了所有光明宇宙的天
神。在她的身上，我们既看到了创造，又看到了毁灭，既看
到了秩序，又看到了混乱，而总的说来，黑暗和混沌是她的
本质。”-引《神谱》…… 对于“我们既看到了创造，又
看到了毁灭，既看到了秩序，又看到了混乱”1453 年哥白尼
《天体运行论》展示了大宇宙体系的宏伟蓝图；接下来，德
国天文学家开普勒（1571-1630 年）在 1609 年-1619 年发布
了宇宙恒星和谐的“行星三定律” ，确立了宇宙地球恒星整
体和谐法则:
一:行星饶恒星旋转的轨道为椭圆,且恒星在一个椭
心(焦点)上.
二:行星与恒星的连线(矢径)在单位时间内扫过的面
积相等.
三:太阳系中各行星轨道半径 R(椭圆半轴)的立方与
行星运行周期 T 的平方成正比,即 R^3=kT^2 太阳系中的开
普勒恒量 k=3.354*10^13 米^3/秒^2.
48三 、开普勒第三定律来自宇宙大爆炸智能原力的广
谱应用：
（一）、通过测出形体的绕转周期以及半长轴，算出
双星的质量及估计中心天体的质量；
（二）、通过两绕同一中心天体运动的行星的公转周
期，算出这两行星分别到中心天体的平均距离。（因实际轨
道为椭圆形，故采用平均距离）。
(三)、在星—箭分离问题中，通过星箭椭圆运动周期
之比，计算星箭运动轨迹半长轴之比。
(四）、 开普勒揭示了大宇宙体系整体生命体系和
谐秘籍
开普勒不无遗憾地说， “哥白尼没有觉察到他伸手可
得的财富”。就因为哥白尼知道几个圆合并起来就可以产生
椭圆，却从来没有用椭圆来描述过天体的轨道，并延续了托
勒密的本轮系，忽略了宇宙大爆炸以来形成的一种完整和严
谨——大宇宙对应人体小宇宙，1628 年哈维《心血运动论》
提出“小宇宙体系” ，哈维无比激动讴歌：啊！小宇宙体系
我心中的太阳！——开拓了人体整体生命学先河!……
49这样，就把小宇宙体系我心中的太阳和大宇宙体系整
合诞生了宇宙大爆炸“整体生命学” ；20 世纪 60 年代，詹
姆斯.拉夫罗夫根据古希腊神话故事将“两个生命宇宙体系”
深入研究形成假说。命名为“盖亚假说”。詹姆斯认为，生
命有很多不同的定义，不同的时代对生命的定义也不同。有
哲学上的定义，生物学上的定义、人工智能上的定义等等。
詹姆斯表示，能够运用能量使内环境保持稳定是生物的普遍
属性。根据这一点，地球也可以称之为生命。 关于“内、
外环境说”贝尔纳法国生理学家（1813 年 7 月 12 日-1878
年 2 月 10 日）现代生理学的奠基人之一。在《实验医学研
究导论》提出内、外环境概念，完成传统经验医学向现代医
学的历史性转变；贝尔纳“内环境”法则： “两种环境中，
一种是外环境，生物体置身其间，另一为内环境是身体组织
的各个部分赖以生存之处。在外环境中并不发生生命进程中
那些活动，生命的进程只发生在液相的内环境中。这一液相
的内环境是由包围并浸浴着组织中所有解剖学成分的循环
体液所构成的。”这里， “液相的内环境”继承了希波克拉
底体液说又与拉夫罗夫的“能够运用能量使内环境保持稳定
是生物的普遍属性”吻合，还成为薛定谔《生命是什么》-
“生命以负熵为生”法则的率先表达——我们把这些理论整
合在一起，就是宇宙地球现代“整体生命学”诠释的集锦！
——美国国家科学院院士刘易斯.托马斯在《医学的历史教
50训》 中深刻总结临床检验时，语重心长地警示说： “按着
惯例现代医学的开端被定在 20 世纪 2、30 年代中期，以磺
胺类药物和青霉素进入药典为标志，人们还通常把医疗实践
中的革命性力量归因于这些事件。在那个时候事情看上去就
是这样。医学被翻了个个儿，有的给革命化了。从前的许许
多多不治之症，在那时找到疗法了。已经有了治愈的良
方……几乎一夜之间，柳暗花明；一些最常见，最要命的人
类疾病——大叶肺炎、脑膜炎、伤寒、结核病、各种类型的
败血病，都可能用抗生素立时治愈了。”……
可是啊！皮特.布鲁克史密斯在《未来的灾难》大胆
预言“超级病毒”（通常是指对两种以上的抗生素耐药的菌
株，即为“超级细菌”）来袭；布鲁克史密斯说： “已经为
艾滋病等疾病在全世界无度肆虐又出现了令人恐怖的世界
疫病灾难新趋势：比如 2004 年本来已经远离人们的小儿麻
痹症又冲破了免疫‘糖丸’的抑制，在非洲部分地区死灰复
燃、肺结核“白色瘟疫”也在世界范围重新大规模传播，已
经成为当今中国传染病的第一大杀手、2004 年南亚禽流感至
今没有完全消声灭迹、2005 年马尔堡出血热到 4 月 17 日据
报告已有 255 人感染，233 人死亡，死亡率达 91%以上”……
世界多种疫病尚无治疗药物、疫苗和方法……事实证明，面
对 2019 年 12 月突如其来的新冠病毒全球大流行历时 3 年的
残酷肆虐，科学家尚束手无策，只能靠新冠病毒自身的不断
51变异、病毒变异出现奥密克戎减毒化达到普通感冒才“神秘
消失”——这是病毒整体性的确切证明！
十七、美国科学院院士、临床专家托马斯对人体与宇
宙地球生命的整体性总结和《盖亚假说》的深刻预言
“地球是生物、是发育中的胚胎、甚至是一单个细
胞。”——刘易斯.托马斯《细胞生命的礼赞》这是一个生
物学观察者的手记、这是一个绝顶医学临床专家的实践对地
球科学的整体顿悟……
对于人类疾病的症结与教训托马斯同样运用宇宙地
球生命的整体性细细总结说：
“我相信，迄今为止的纪录倾向于支持这一预感。我
所知道的最为复杂的，牵涉到多细胞、多组织、而且多器官
的疾病，是三期梅毒，慢性结核病，还有顽固性贫血。在每
一种情况中，至少有五个主要器官和组织卷了进去，而且每
一器官，每一组织似乎都受到许多环境因素的影响。在对之
进行科学评估之前，每一种都被认为是我们现在所说的 “多
因素”疾病；它们过于复杂，不允许人们考虑任何一单个发
病机制。 ”托马斯一生临床科学研究证明“这一整体的任
务就是保持所有成员的良性发展”和宇宙地球生命是一个不
可分割的整体……
52拉夫罗夫在 1979 年出版了《盖亚假说：对地球上生命
的新认识》一书，书中拉夫罗夫结论说： “地球是一种所有
生物与矿物在一起的巨大共生体，共生指的就是有利于所有
部分的生物联合，这一超级有机体的特性，就是通过负反馈
机制，尽可能地保持一个有利于生命活动的状态。”也就是
说，拉夫洛克认为，应该把地球看做各个部分相互关联的整
体，而这一整体的任务就是保持所有成员的良性发展，并用
科学实验证明了公元前四百年古希腊大哲学家柏拉图“地球
是一巨大活生物体”预言！让我们把柏拉图的预言和拉夫罗
夫的科学实验放到 138 亿年宇宙大爆炸“奇点” ，就可以见
证整体生命学起源宇宙大爆炸的结论——宇宙大爆炸理论
认为宇宙起源于一个极为致密、温度极高的“奇点” ，在大
约 138 亿年前，这个“奇点”发生了一次规模巨大的“大爆
炸” ，随后不断地膨胀，在此过程中物质的密度和温度持续
下降，并最终形成了我们现在所看到的宇宙。大爆炸后 10-12
秒：约 1015 度，粒子期，质子和中子及其反粒子形成，玻
色子、中微子、电子、夸克以及胶子稳定下来……】也就是
说，在“大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，粒子期，质子和
中子及其反粒子形成” ，在“10-33 秒，在此瞬间，宇宙经
历了 100 次加倍（2100），得到的尺度是先前尺度的 1030
倍”——根据“量子纠缠”是在量子力学中处于纠缠态的两
个或多个粒子，即便分开很远距离，有些状态也会表现得像
53是一个整体的原力，人类长期以来无法解释为什么量子纠缠
可以超越光速，并且不需要介质（超距作用）就可以相互影
响——用今天物理的语言来说：对于一个处于纠缠态的多粒
子系统，其量子态函数不能分解成各个部分的量子态的乘
积。通俗的讲，量子纠缠指的是在空间上分开的两个或多个
粒子，由于某种相互作用，使得各个粒子所拥有的信息或物
理性质成为了整体特性而无法分离，这就是为何称为“纠
缠”。
宇宙大爆炸一开始（大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，
粒子期）大爆炸就运用量子纠缠创造了一种不可分割的整体
和一种隐含的秩序-宇宙万物，并证明原力是“量子纠缠”
初始存在的微观量子本原。量子纠缠，就是在两个分隔的超
距粒子或者多个粒子，在彼此相互作用时，由于各个粒子所
拥有的特性完全综合成为整体性质，在大爆炸以后过程中一
般观测者实验无法单独描述各个粒子的性质；鉴此，托勒密
的“对点”设置，不惜冒犯对天体运动必是匀速圆周运动的
古希腊原则，开启了宇宙星球“圆周变速运动”先河，是一
场史无前例的“后相对论”宇宙认识论大革命……
宇宙大爆炸证明，量子纠缠是指在量子力学中处于纠缠
态的两个或多个粒子，即便分开很远距离，有些状态也会表
现得像是一个整体。也就是说，量子纠缠指的是在空间上分
54开的两个或多个粒子，由于某种相互作用，使得各个粒子所
拥有的信息或物理性质成为了整体特性而无法分离，这就是
为何称为“纠缠” ， “纠缠”更基本的层面，代表了一种不
可分割的整体和一种隐含的秩序，在此之上才产生了我们对
这个经验宇宙的解释秩序，量子纠缠，就是在两个分隔的粒
子或者多个粒子，在彼此相互作用时，由于各个粒子所拥有
的特性已综合成为整体性质，无法单独描述各个粒子的性
质。
追朔 5000 年古希腊哲学家亚里士多德最早思考过太阳
光和生命的关联，这是真实的古希腊文明史；谁也没有想到：
霍金的宇宙大爆炸却导出在现代这片宇宙，起源于大约 138
亿年前的一个奇点，这个奇点无穷重无穷小，后来这个奇点
爆炸了，然后形成了今天的这片宇宙！
这里，霍金大爆炸理论的关键是“奇点” 、 “大爆炸” ；
一个密度无限大体积无限小的一个点。于 138 亿年前在这个
点爆炸了，最终形成了今天这片宽约 960 亿光年的宇宙——
于是，太阳就在大爆炸中诞生，是太阳孵化了宇宙地球生命
吗?！
十八、宇宙大爆炸确认万物生长靠太阳却和现代科学
主流在一个宇宙时间轴存在严重矛盾太阳却早在 100 亿年前
就诞生
55太阳生生熙熙普照大地千古不变——然而，现代科学理
论都认为地球仅仅存在 46 亿年、微生物化石见证在 37 亿年
——这与宇宙大爆炸 138 亿年存在时间轴的巨大反差——因
为人类已知科学著述都是古希腊流传下来的:比如阿基
米德流传于世的数学著作有 10 余种，多为希腊文手
稿。他的著作集中探讨了求积问题，主要是曲边图形
的面积和曲面立方体的体积，其体例深受欧几里德
《几何原本》的影响，先是设立若干定义和假设，再
依次证明，作为数学家，他写出了《论球和圆柱》、
《圆的度量》、《抛物线求积》、《论螺线》、《论
锥体和球体》、《沙的计算》等数学著作。作为力学
家，他着有《论图形的平衡》、《论浮体》、《论杠
杆》、《原理》等力学著作。科学史称能推（撬）动
地球的人——阿基米德。
阿基米德(Archimedes,约公元前 287～212)是古
希腊物理学家、数学家,静力学和流体静力学的奠基
人.
除了伟大的牛顿和伟大的爱因斯坦,再没有一个
人象阿基米德那样为人类的进步做出过这样大的贡
献.即使牛顿和爱因斯坦也都曾从他身上汲取过智慧
和灵感.他是“理论天才与实验天才合于一人的理想
化身”,文艺复兴时期的达芬奇和伽利略等人都拿他
56来做自己的楷模.
再有希腊文化科学的集大者——亚里士多德的
科学遗产：
亚里士多德(Aristoteles,384 年—322BC.)是古
希腊最著名的哲学家、渊博的学者.他总结了泰勒斯
以来古希腊哲学发展的结果,首次将哲学和其他科学
区别开来,开创了逻辑、伦理学、政治学和生物学等
学科的独立研究.他的学术思想对西方文化、科学的
发展产生了巨大的影响；
几何学的创始人—— 欧几里得
欧几里得（Euclid,约 300BC.）是古希腊最一位
伟大的数学家之一.早年在雅典受教育,熟知柏拉图
的学说.公元前 300 年左右,受托勒密王（前 364-前
283）之邀,到埃及统治下的亚历山大城工作,长期从
事教学、研究和著述.他写过不少数学、天文、光学
和音乐方面的著作,而以巨著《原本》最闻名于世.《原
本》原有 13 卷,后人又补充 2 卷.这本著作的原稿早
已失传,现存的是公元 4 世纪末西翁的修订本和 18 世
纪在梵蒂冈图书馆发现的希腊文手抄原本.这部西方
世界现存最古老的数学著作,为 2000 年来用公理法建
立演绎的数学体系树立了最早的典范.德摩根曾说,
除了《圣经》,再没有任何一种书像《原本》这样拥
57有如此众多的读者,被译成如此多种语言.从 1482 年
到 19 世纪末,《原本》的各种版本竟用各种语言出了
1000 版以上.明朝万历年间(1607),徐光启和意大利
传教士利玛窦把前 6 卷译成中文出版,定名为“几何
原本”.“几何”这个数学名词就是这样来的.《几何
原本》是中国近代翻译的第一部西方数学著作.
“希腊化时代的哥白尼”——阿里斯塔克。
阿里斯塔克斯（Aristarchos,310—230BC.）生
于爱琴海中的萨摩斯岛,曾就学于雅典学园.他不但
是一个精细的观察者,而且还是一位天才的理论家.
他对宇宙的看法与众不同.他认为太阳和恒星都是不
动的,地球和行星围绕着太阳旋转,地球又绕自己的
轴每天自转一周.
“地理学之父”——埃拉托色尼为“地理”命名，
从此人类有了地理学！
埃拉托色尼（Eratosthenes,275—193BC.）生于
希腊在非洲北部的殖民地昔勒尼（cyrene,在今利比
亚）.他在昔勒尼和雅典接受了良好的教育,成为一位
博学的哲学家、诗人、天文学家和地理学家.他的兴
趣是多方面的,不过他的成就则主要表现在地理学和
天文学方面
事实上，人类一开始就存在于平行宇宙世界之
58中！……古希腊文明的政治制度是“城邦制” ，各个
城主都是相对独立的，类似于中国周朝时期的诸侯制
度，雅典的灭亡并不能说古希腊文明就随之灭亡，顶
替古希腊之名的是亚历山大帝国和古罗马帝国，但马
其顿其实也是古希腊的城邦之一，古希腊、亚历山大、
古罗马这三者其实就像中国的朝代交替一样，虽然古
希腊的名字不再，但其文明传承是一样的，亚历山大
与古罗马帝国其实也是继承和发展古希腊文明，其哲
学的研究也是一脉相承的，所以亚山册大和古罗马并
非古希腊文明的灭亡者，而是文明的继承者和发扬
者。
古希腊文明的消失其实是随着古罗马帝国的灭
亡开始的。罗马帝国灭亡后，欧洲陷入四分五裂的情
况，加上被称为“上帝之鞭”的匈奴人阿提拉的西迁
入侵，使得欧洲陷入长时间的战乱，古希腊文明也失
去了传承。战乱之时，宗教最容易兴趣，在这之后，
基督教神学文明的兴起，神权至上的基督教统治着欧
洲，顶替了消失的古希腊文明。一场战争可能灭亡不
了古希腊文明，只能持续几百、甚至上千年！……
其实，1915 年，爱因斯坦的相对论并没有推翻牛
顿建立的大部分科学体系，说什么牛顿运动定律在超
出经典力学范围或质点、惯性参考系以及宏观、低速
59运动问题等适用条件时，不再成立……那只是一种参
照系的转圜；同样，这种自然科学历史反差，在 2022
年诺贝尔物理学奖也毫不例外实验证明了“爱因斯坦
错误” 、对贝尔不等式的违反和开创性的量子信息科
学！事实上，这一切反差并不影响《盖亚假说》确认
“地球看做各个部分相互关联的整体” 。也就是说，
现代人认为“地球仅仅存在 46 亿年、微生物化石见
证在 37 亿年”和太阳在 100 亿年前就诞生的反差在
宇宙大爆炸的时间轴上的“数”也是一种参照系的宇
宙时间轴超人想象的变化！——这就是科学历史的
“后相对论认识论”的历史必然。
从宇宙大爆炸整体生命学的时间轴，看薛定谔的
《自然与希腊人科学与人文主义》，恰恰是选择了古
希腊自然科学时间轴为开端，发展到现代人的 21 世
纪 20 年代，这一段有确切史实记载的科学历史 5000
年巨大跨度的科学发展奇迹是千古难能可贵的啊！—
—纵观这段自然科学研究，都是从细微的自然现象着
手思考、经验体会、观察、研究，后来发展到实验科
学都是在使用这种“钢化法” ，于是就产生了多门类、
多学科、繁纷复杂、甚至包容宇内的世纪大科学——
伟大的物理学家薛定谔却一反常态帅先垂范地把物
理学整合到生物学，用《生命是什么？》创造了物理
60生物学理论整合奇迹，并强调说：【我们从先辈那里
继承了对于统一的、无所不包的知识的强烈渴望。最
高学府(大学,“大学”一词在英文中和普遍性同字根)
这个名称使我们想起了从古到今多少世纪以来，只有
普遍性才是唯一可打满分的。可是近 100 多年来,知
识的各种分支在广度和深度上的扩展使我们陷入了
一种奇异的两难境地。我们清楚地感到，一方面我们
现在还只是刚刚开始获得某些可靠的资料,试图把所
有已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整体;可是,另一
方面,一个人想要驾御比一个狭小的专门领域再多一
点的知识，也已经是几乎不可能的了。】我们按薛定
谔“试图把所有已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整
体”战略构想，运用阿基米德名言“给我应该支点我
会把整个地球撬动起来”的“原创力支点”理论，尝
试把 5000 年古希腊自然科学辉煌成果和现代自然科
学知识整合起来“把所有已知的知识综合成为一个统
一的整体” ，用《宇宙大爆炸整体生命学》展示 5000
年辉煌的宇宙自然科学尽可能完美，达到薛定谔期待
的世界“所有已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整体” ，
彰显 21 世纪现代“量子纠缠”科学与精神的整体统
一！
第二章 刘易斯.托马斯论“整体生命学”
61一、 “刘易斯准则”
美国著名医学家刘易斯·托马斯，经过一生整体性医
学实践，对生命整体机制理论著作巨丰、难以置辩地
指出了人和群居性动物的共同性。《对于外激素的恐
惧》、《这个世界的音乐》、《说味》、《鲸鱼座》、
《信息》、《计算机》、《语汇种种》、《活的语言》
等篇，特别是《细胞生命的赞》强调了生物间信息交
流整体的重要性，从另一方面指出了人和其他生物本
质整体上的同一性，独一无二论述“整体生命学”理
论机制，
托马斯对生命整体机制系统经典论述：
“我认为，过去半个世纪的记录确立了两条关于人类
疾病的普遍原则。第一，必须多多了解疾病的潜在机
理,才能真正采取有效的行动；必须知道，是肺炎双
球菌引起了大叶肺炎，才能想到用抗生素，用不着知
道所有细节，甚至用不着知道肺炎双球菌是怎样对肺
造成损害的，但你得知道它在哪儿，并且起着决定的
作用。
每一种疾病都有一单个关键的机制，压过其它所有机
制。如果能找到它，然后想出法子来对付它，就能够
控制那种疾患。这一概括较难证明，并且容易有争议，
与其说是一条科学论断。倒不如说它是一个强烈的预
62感，可我相信，迄今为止的记录倾向于支持这一预感。
我所知道的最为复杂的牵涉到多细胞，多组织，而且
多器官的疾病，是三期梅毒，慢性结核病，还有顽固
性贫血。在每一种情况中，至少有三个器官和组织卷
了进去，而且每一器官，每一组织，似乎都受到许多
环境因素的影响。在对之进行科学评估之前，每一种
都被认为是我们现在所说的‘多因素’疾病。它过于
复杂，不允许人们考虑任何一单个发病机制，然而，
当所有必要的事实都到手时，很清楚，只要关掉一件
事情——螺旋杆菌，结核杆菌，或者是那一种维生素
缺乏，那么，整套紊乱的，似乎不相干的发病机理都
能够一下子全关掉了。 ”
刘易斯.托马斯两个普遍原则：潜在机理和环境因素
影响的“多因素”单个机制的本质就是对生命整体性
的确认；同样是生物微生态的预言和临床医学表述。
则托马斯强调： “我们关于自己知之甚少。关于我们
如何运作，占什么位置，最要紧的是关于我们扎根于
其中作为工作部件的这个巨大的，不可思议的生命系
统，我们是无知的。我们并不了解自然，一点都不了
解。 ”
上述理论构成“整体生命学”理论根基。
从《细胞生命的礼赞》“说味”看整体与机制的整体
63生命理论——托马斯把许多事物看作整体的、有生命
的活的系统。群居性昆虫群是一个生命，鱼群、鸟群
是一个生命，社会、城市是一个有机物，科研机构是
活的生物，人类语言是活的生物，地球是生物、是发
育中的胚胎、甚至是一单个细胞……
二、 “holism（整体论）这个词诞生在托马斯临床医
学之现代医学伟大复兴
《细胞生命的礼赞》对生命“整体”历史由来与
赞美：
·“但即使如此，如果在开始的、局部的阶段，这种
转化是协调的、整体和谐的生理过程，仍然有一事尚
待解释，那就是意识的永久消失。我们还得永远困惑
于这个问题吗？”
·“holism（整体论）这个生造的词一向被用于“超
有机体”这类概念。人们思忖，是否就是这个词吓退
了某些研究者。这个词的确是面目可畏。简·斯马茨
将军（jan christiaan smuts，1870－1950，南非）
1926 年杜撰了这个词。当时，如把它写成 wholism 也
许会好些。wholism 在词源上完全合格，而在我们这
种世纪，它会因足够世俗而能幸存下来。然而，既写
成现在的样子，其前途就可忧了。holism 这个词见于
某些科学词典，但还没有收入大多数标准的英语词典
64中。牛津英语大辞典增编里收了它，这是重要的，但
还不足以保证它存活下来。弄不好它会随超有机体学
说一块儿灭亡，对这事我不能置一词。如果一个理论
不能自行发展，推动它是无济于事的。最好还是让它
呆在那儿吧。 ”
“或许，我们只是刚刚开始学着使用这个系统，而
作为一个物种，我们整个的演化过程几乎还都在后
头。也许，我们今天产生并在大脑之间疾速传播的思
想，就好象在香港和波士顿的宴会桌上同时讲着的笑
话，就好象我们发式的突然改变，就象今天流行的所
有爱情歌曲。它们不过是日后更复杂的聚合结构的原
始阶段，可以跟生物演化早期漂游在浅水洼里的原核
细胞相提并论。后来，时机适宜的时候，那些片片断
断之间出现了融合与共生，那时，我们就会看到真核
的思想，看到思维的后生动物，看到思维彼此生长在
一起的巨大珊瑚礁。
这样的机制已经存在，并且无疑已经能够发挥作
用，尽管迄今为止的全部产品基本上还是些断片。但
不得不说，从演化的角度来看，我们运用大脑的时候
还极其短暂，不过区区几千年，而人类的历史怕要延
续几十亿年。在这几千年中，人类思想一直是斑斑块
65块地分散在地球各处。这样的思想交流，或许有某些
规律，规定了它可以有效地运行的临界浓度和质量。
只有到了本世纪，我们才大规模地彼此靠近，才得以
在整个地球范围内开始融合，而从今往后，这一进程
可以迅速向前了。 ”-也就是说， “整体” 、 “系统” 、
“机制”是整体的机制。
二、托马斯论整体生命学不可分割的三大优势
《细胞生命的礼赞》整体、系统、机制词源：
有一种观点认为，群集的社会性昆虫在某种意义上相
当于庞大的、多生命组成的生物。这些生物具有一种
集体的智慧和善于适应的天性，这种智慧和适应力远
远高于个体的总和。这一想法始于著名昆虫学家威
廉·莫顿·惠勒（William MortonWheeler）的一些
论文中。他提出“超有机体”（Superorganism）这
一术语，以描绘这种组织。从 1911 年到 50 年代前期，
这一思想被列为昆虫学的重要思想之一，吸引了昆虫
学 圈 外 许 多 热 心 人 的 注 意 力 。 米 德 林 克
（Maeterlinck,M.）和马雷（Marais,E.N.）写了几
本畅销书，书的基本观点认为，在蚁穴和白蚁巢中的
某个角落，必定存在一种精神。
后来，不知怎的，这个想法突然不时行、而且不
见踪影了。在过去四分之一世纪中，在昆虫科学激增
66的文献里，几乎没有一处提起它，没有人谈论它。不
只是因为这一想法被人忘记了；倒似乎是这种想法提
不得，提起来让人难堪。
这件事很难解释。那个想法并没有显得错到哪里
去，也没有与其他任何更容易接受的想法相冲突。只
是因为，没有一个人想得出，这样一种抽象的理论，
拿它来好干什么。那时它在知识界占了重要的一席之
地，正是昆虫学作为颇有力量的开拓性科学刚刚兴
起、刚能解决复杂细致的问题的时候。它俨然成了新
还原论的范式。那一巨大思想——个体的生物可能在
与一个密集社会的联系中自我超越，是新技术无法处
理的，它也没有提出新的实验或方法。它只是横在当
道，只不过被落叶般的论文所覆盖，需要有启发性的
价值衡量才能使之幸存。而缺的就是这个。
Holism（整体论）这个生造的词一向被用于“超
有机体”这类概念。人们思忖，是否就是这个词吓退
了某些研究者。这个词的确是面目可畏。简·斯马茨
将军（Jan Christiaan Smuts，1870－1950，南非）
1926 年杜撰了这个词。当时，如把它写成 wholism 也
许会好些。Wholism 在词源上完全合格，而在我们这
种世纪，它会因足够世俗而能幸存下来。然而，既写
成现在的样子，其前途就可忧了。Holism 这个词见于
67某些科学词典，但还没有收入大多数标准的英语词典
中。牛津英语大辞典增编里收了它，这是重要的，但
还不足以保证它存活下来。弄不好它会随超有机体学
说一块儿灭亡，
对这事我不能置一词。如果一个理论不能自行发
展，推动它是无济于事的。最好还是让它呆在那儿吧。
然而，问题可能在于，有人推过它，但推的方向错了。
依照惠勒的标准，蚂蚁或白蚁、蜜蜂、群居性黄蜂的
群落，可能实际上都是超有机体。但在目前，就昆虫
来说，很可能这就是信息线的终点了。或许，如果你
把这种理论用于另一种社会性物种或较易对付的物
种，路子会顺一些吧。这样的物种是有的，比如说，
我们。
有件事长期以来让昆虫学家心烦。这就是，我们
这些外行人总是干预他们的事务：总是用人类的行为
来为昆虫行为提供解释。昆虫学家花了大力气向我们
解释，蚂蚁们根本不是人类的小小机械模型。我同意
他们的意见。我们所确知的关于人类行为的一切，没
有一条有可能解释蚂蚁们的所作所为。我们不应当过
问蚂蚁的事，那是昆虫学家的事。至于蚂蚁本身，很
显然，它们才不需要我们的教诲呢。
然而，这并不意味着，我们不能反其意而用之。比如，
68走运的话，蚂蚁的集体行为，可能有助于我们理解人
类的问题。
这方面有着许多可能性。但只要想一想一个由上
百万的蚂蚁组成的蚁群群落营造巢穴的情景。每一只
蚂蚁都在不停地、强制性地工作着，把自己那部分工
作干得精益求精，却一点也不知道别处正在营建着什
么东西。蚂蚁就这样度过短暂的一生，而它为之工作
的事业对它来说则亘古永存（蚁群每天死亡百分之三
到四；大约一月之内，一代蚂蚁就销声匿迹，而蚁穴
则可存续六十年之久；若无天灾，则永世不坏）。蚂
蚁们在一片混乱之中精确无误、专心致志地工作着，
蹒跚地越过一只只蚂蚁同伴，衔来一点点细枝和泥
土，把它们准确地排列成合适的形状，好给蚁卵和蚁
仔们保暖和通风。但孤立起来，它们一个个都那么柔
弱无力。这样看来，在人类活动之中，只有一件事能
与之媲美，那就是语言。
我们制造着语言，一代接一代，延续了无数代，
却不知道语言是怎么造出来的，也不知道造完时——
假如还能造完的话——会是什么样子。在我们做的事
情当中，这件工作最具有强迫的集体性，最受遗传程
序所规定，最为我们人类这个物种所独有，同时也是
最自发的工作，我们干起来也是准确无误。这是自然
69而然的事。我们有营管语法的 DNA，有营管句法的神
经原，什么时候也不得停止。我们摸爬攀越，经过一
个又一个文明时期，变着形，到处造出工具和城市，
而新的词汇随时都在跌跌撞撞拥挤而出。
那些词汇本身也令人惊异。每个词都是完美地为其使
用目的设计出来的。旧词和较为有力的词是膜状的，
塞满了层层不同的意思，象是一个词构成的诗。比如
articulated 起先是划分为小关节的意思，后来不知
不觉有了成句说话的意思。有些词在日常使用中渐渐
改变，直到变化完成时我们才知道发生了变化。今天
的一些副词中的-ly，如 ably（得力地）、benignly
（慈祥地）等词中的后缀-ly，几百年前刚出现时是
用来代替 like（好象）的。后来，like 经过销磨，
成了个后缀。通过类似的过程，love-did（古英语 love
（爱）的过去时）.后来变成了 loved。
没有哪一个词是我们认识的哪个人造出的。它们
只是需要时在语言中出现。有时候，一个熟悉的词会
突然被人抓起来，用来指一件很奇怪的东西：今天，
奇怪（strange）这个词本身就是这样一个词。原子
物理学家需要它，用它来代表一种衰变极慢的粒子的
性质。现在，这种粒子称为“奇异粒子”（strange
particles），它们具有“奇异数”（strangeness
70number[s]）。这种旧有的熟词突爆冷门现出陌生面
孔的事，我们已认为稀松平常。这一过程已经进行几
千年了。
有几个词是我们当代的几个独居人造出来的，比
如 Holism 是斯马茨造的，Quark（夸克粒子）是乔伊
斯（Joyce）造的。但这类词中的大多数具有异国风
味，是昙花一现的。一个词要真正成为一个站得住脚
的词，那需要大量的应用。
大多数新词是由原有的其他词演变的。语言的创
造是一个保守的过程：旧物翻新，很少浪费。每有新
词从旧词脱颖而出，原有的意思往往象气味一样在新
词周围萦绕不去，诡秘莫辨。
创造 Holism 的人意思很简单，不过意指若干生
命单位的完整组合。只因它貌似 holy（神圣），便暗
示了“在生物学方面超自然”的意义。追根溯源，那
个词来自印欧语中的词根 kailo，意为整个（whole），
也有未遭打击、未着伤之意。数千年来，它嬗变成 hail
（whole 的古语）、hale（whole）、health（健全）、
hallow（使神圣）、holy（神圣）、whole，还有 heal
（愈合），直到现在，这些词义在我们头脑中还是同
往同来。 “Heuristic ”（启发式的）是个更专门、
用途更单一的词，它来自印欧语中的 wer，意思是寻
71找。后来，出现于希腊语中，成为 heuriskein，于是，
阿基米德发现浮力定律时就喊出了 Heureka（我找到
了）！
来自印欧语的还有两个容量颇丰的词：gene 和
bheu。每—个词简直都是一个蚁丘。我们已经由这两
个词建造了万物这个概念。起初，或者说从有案可查
的时候，它们的大意是存在。Gene 意思是开始、生育，
而 bheu 则指存在和生长。Gene 依次变成 kundjaz（日
耳曼语）和 gecynd（古英语），意为 kin（亲族）或
kind（慈）。Kind 开始指亲属关系，后指高的社会地
位，再后来变成了 Kindly （慈祥地）和 gentle（优
雅）之意。与此同时，gene 的另一支成了拉丁语的
gens（氏族），后来成了 gentle。它同时也表现为
genus（种属）、genius（天才）、genital（生殖的）
和 generous（宽宏大量的）。然后它变成了 nature
（自然）（来自 gnas ci），但仍然包含着它的内在
意义。
就在 gene 演化为 nature 和 kind 的时候，bheu
经历了类似的变化。其中的一支变成了日耳曼语中的
bowan 和古挪威语中的 bua，意思是生活和居住，然
后成了英语中的 build（建设）。进入希腊语，成了
phuein，意为产生和使生长，后来成了 phusis，这是
72意指自然的另一个词。由 phusis 又生出 physic，
physic 开始意为自然科学，后指医学，再后来成了
physics（物理学）。
这两个词发展演化到了今天，毫不夸张地说，可
以合在一起囊括宇宙间万物。这种词可不是随便一找
就能找到的。它们也不能被从零造起。它们需要活过
很久才能表示意义。C.S.刘易斯（Lewis）在讨论词
汇时写道： “万物是不可言传的论题。 ”词本身必定
显现出长期使用的内在标记；它们一定包含着自己的
内部对话。
这些年来，自然和物理两词在其现存意义上，早
就被我们头脑通过某种猜测联系到了一起；在今天这
种时候，知道这一点可让人心里踏实些。萦绕在它们
周围的其他词令人迷惑，但看起来挺有趣。如果你松
松种儿，所有这些词就都会掺和到一起，变成一种可
爱的、令人不解的东西。 “Kind”是亲属，但它又意
指自然。Kind 跟 gentle 原是一个词，啊，老天爷，
物理自然是自然，但是慈（kind）竟然也是这个词。
在这迷人的结构中，就包含了极其古老的猜测，诸多
古老思想在其中混响着。
大约部分是由于语言的魔法吧，有些人可以用完
全不同的词作到殊途同归。一个 14 世纪的女隐士叫
73作诺威奇的朱利安（Julian of Norwich）就此说过
一段精彩的话，以至于一个物理学家最近在一篇从自
然科学角度评论当代宇宙论物理学的文章的导言中
引用了这段话： “他给我看一样小东西，有榛子那样
大小，放在我手里，象球一样圆。我就在手里用我的
眼光看着它，想：这是什么东西？所得到的笼而统之
的回答是：它就是被创造的一切。 ”
——这就是我们在清华大学平台创建“整体生命学”
三部曲（《整体板块遗传律》、《种性制约机制》、
《人工自然选择律》）的由来与初衷。
三、莫诺对整体板块遗传的实验证明：
1937 年起，莫诺按莱沃夫的指导，改用大肠杆菌
进行生理学研究。在实验中，他发现了所谓“二阶段
生长曲线”的现象标志着拉开了基因整体调控的序幕
-用各种单糖、双糖或其混合物为能源培养细菌，其
生长速度是糖浓度的函数。然而，当莫诺用葡萄糖和
乳糖同时作为能源时，曲线开始上升，在葡萄糖用完
时，曲线变得平坦，过一段时间以后再上升。这就是
所谓“二阶段生长曲线” ，
莫诺发现在乳糖代谢中不是只有一种酶而是有
三种酶的共同参与是一种整体行为：三种酶都由一个
共同诱导物激活，莫诺推论控制这三种酶合成的基因
74在染色体上必定是整体相邻的；因为薛定谔“负熵”
决定能量，可以推论：所有生命均有“二阶段生长曲
线”现象。
1957年9月莫诺去美国伯克利大学病毒实验室与
帕迪、雅各布、莫诺三科学家共同开展“Pa、Ja、Mo
实验”即：将能合成β半乳糖苷酶的细菌（z+）与不
能合成该酶的细菌（z-），以及加入诱导物后能合成
该酶的细菌（i+）与不需诱导物就能合成该酶的细菌
（i-），进行相互之间的交配（正反交），记录酶产
生的时间和酶活性的增长速度，找出相互之间的关
系。这是由帕迪、雅各布、莫诺三人合作进行的一系
列实验，主要由帕迪实际操作，是一项既花费时间和
精力又十分枯燥乏味的劳动。然而，对这一系列实验
结果的解释，却导致了一个崭新的遗传理论——基因
调控理论。本质地看，完全是基因整体调控-三种酶
合成的基因在染色体上必定是整体相邻进行相互之
间的交配（正反交）、三者缺一不可。也就是说，控
制乳糖代谢的三个结构基因（β半乳糖苷酶基因 z、
β半乳糖苷通透酶基因 y 和β半乳糖苷转乙酰酶基因
a）是在细胞染色体的相邻位置上，受同一“开关”
的控制，因为这三种酶的产量总是相关的，而且这些
基因的排列是顺型的。决定开关的基因被称为“操纵
75基因” 。操纵基因（o）位于三个结构基因（z、y、a）
的与 z 相邻的一端。操纵基因与结构基因组成一个操
纵子-完全是一种基因整体架构模式——当细菌细胞
内诱导物（如乳糖）不存在时，i 基因产生的阻遏物
阻止了操纵基因（o）的开动，mRNA 不能转录结构基
因上的密码，蛋白质（酶）的合成不能进行，即这时
三个结构基因（z、y、a）都处于“关闭”状态-这是
整体的 “关闭”！可是在加入诱导物（乳糖）后，i
基因产生的阻遏物与诱导物结合而失活，操纵基因随
之开动，mRNA 的转录开始，蛋白质合成进行，整体性
分解乳糖的三种酶得以产生。当细胞中乳糖被分解完
后，阻遏物又恢复其活性状态，重新又阻止操纵基因
的开动。这就完成了《蛋白质合成的遗传调节机制》
发表在 1961 年英国的《分子生物学杂志》上。
如果把莫诺整体“操纵子学说”特别是蛋白质的变构
理论和芭芭拉麦克林托克“跳跃基因”统一在托马斯
“但即使如此，如果在开始的、局部的阶段，这种转
化是协调的、整体和谐的生理过程”去深刻思考，我
们只能从芭芭拉麦克林托克对整体板块遗传实验得
到整体板块遗传实验地再证明！……
第三章 孟德尔经典遗传学“整体板块遗传律”揭示
性基因量子性丰富内涵
76一、 孟德尔遗传方阵
孟德尔经典遗传学的理论核心是“遗传方阵”它
决定了基因蛋白质的立体多维形态，而非线性排列并
解密了基因数字化稳定机制。正如薛定谔阐述: “我
在生物学家所谓‘四维模式’的意义上使用有机体的
‘模式’这个词，它不仅指成年有机体或任何其他阶
段有机体的结构和功能，而且指有机体开始繁殖自身
时，从受精卵到成年阶段的个体发育全过程。现在我
们知道，整个四维模式都是由一个细胞即受精卵的结
构决定的。我们还知道，它本质上只是由受精卵的一
小部分即细胞核的结构所决定的。在细胞的正常‘休
止期’内，这个细胞核通常显示为网状染色质分散在
细胞内。但在极为重要的细胞分裂（有丝分裂和减数
分裂，见下文）过程中，可以看到它由一组通常呈纤
维状或棒状的被称为染色体的颗粒所组成，其数目是
8 个或 12 个，人是 48 个。但我其实应该把这些数目
写成 2×4，2×6，……，2×24，……，并且按照生
物学家惯常意义上的表述，把它称为两套染色体。因
为虽然单个染色体有时可以从它的形状和大小清楚
地加以区分和辨认，但这里的两套染色体几乎完全相
同。我们很快就会看到，其中一套来自母体（卵细胞），
另一套来自父体（精子）。正是这些染色体，或者我
77们在显微镜下看到的染色体的一种轴状骨架纤丝，把
个体的未来发育及其成年期机能的全部模式都包含
在某种密码本中。每一整套染色体都包含有全部密
码；因此一般而言，构成未来个体最初阶段的受精卵
里包含有密码的两个副本。遗传下来的实际上是“表
现型”的整个（四维）模式，是个体的可见的、明显
的本性，它们被复制了好几代而没有什么明显改变，
在数个世纪里持久恒定（虽然不能说是数万年不变），
在每一次传递中，负载它们的是结合生成受精卵的两
个细胞的物质结构。这真是个奇迹。 ”-《生命是什
么》
人类最早研究两性“四维模式”的科学家是
孟德尔。提出“遗传方阵”法则：
78孟德尔在十年时间，用纯的（豌豆）种系进行实
验研究，简单地可分 A 的单一性状的种性在 5-6 代繁
衍过程的变化规律。作为规律它应该适合整个物种的
全部性状为单位的动物植物杂交实验，和所有生命的
自然繁殖。即 AA 和 aa 的结合产生的 Aa 无论是繁殖多
少代，它都只能产生 AA、aa、 Aa；而不能产生 AA、
aa、 Aa 以外的种性个体生命。也就是说孟德尔的“性
状”分离定律和自由组合定律是建立在 AA、和 aa 同
一的性细胞量子纠缠属性的“四维模式” ：
7980
AA
aa
P
ARENTS
种性基础之上的。所
以，自由组合是种性
Aa
F1 H
YBRID
制约下的自由组合，
性状分离也是种性制
约下的性状分离；组
●AA
Aa
Aa
aa
F2 H
YBRIDS
合与分离不能超越（
豌豆）的种性，组合
与分离只是豌豆性状
的自由组合与分离。
F3 H
YBRIDS
并提出“遗传方阵”概念 、 “3:1”生命超几何级
数宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理念。
二、 孟德尔遗传方阵 3:1 数理凸显宇宙大爆
炸生命半株“四维模式”繁殖演绎
这是一个“遗传方阵”W（负熵）的 4 n级“四维模
式” ：
W=
×4 n
∵
= 3:1
∴W =（3 ：1）× 4 n
展开：
W =3×4 n ：1×4 n
N 为自然数 1、2、3……
N=1 时 w=12:4N=2 时 w=48:16 依 次 是 192:48 、 768:192 、
3072:768………它们分别为 4 方阵、16 方阵等等……
事实上，整体板块遗传密码的“数理机制是那样的简单。
是 0 和 1 的二进制，是以数理变换的有限性为始，达到无限
集合的 0 和 1 的无穷变幻。这和 1 和 3 的生物二进制遗传数
理变换是极其相似的，0 在自然数列中表示空位，可以是任
何自然数，1 是最小奇数，也是最小正整数，0 小于 1、也（可
以）能大于 1，这就构成了计算机无穷变幻的最小数理变换
机制。1 和 3 应该是最简单物的生物种性演化数理的自然体
现。他们都有共同的属性：以最小的有限性展开无穷大的变
换模式，无边际的变换相位、无终点循环数论机制的特征。：
我们也可以在用二进制 0 和 1 排列的遗传密码表中证实这一
问题（表 1）。
三 从孟德尔 3:1 到查伽夫碱基量子基因半株配对隐涵
的“整体板块遗传律”
我们先从以下 5 个英文字母谈起，先看一下 A、T、U 和
C、、G 这五个英文字母的含意：C=胞嘧啶脱氧核糖核苷酸
U=尿嘧啶核苷酸 T=胸腺嘧啶脱氧核糖核苷酸 A-腺嘌呤脱氧
核糖核苷酸 J-鸟嘌昤脱氧核糖核苷酸 C、U、T、A、G 是组成
遗传密码的最小的密钥字母。据-子比一配对的数理和查伽
夫规律。可以把这五个密钥字母分为为两组。A-T –U 和 C-G。
我们把这两组密钥字母用莱布尼茨的二进制数字 0 和 1 变换
81一下。如：O—C：O—C-G1——-A – T –U。用变换所得数字
的排列和表内的遗相对排列，得到一张二进制数字 0、l 加
密的遗传密码表。 ：于是我们看到孟德尔的遗传因子规律
又显了出来，我们看到自上而下每三排密码，从左向右第二
第四竖行的符号完全相同。第四排不同，显出了组密码（群）
1：1 的变化规律。从上向下 U、C、A、G 四组遗传密码，每
一组排都有这样严格的变化规律。而且，从上向下看，竖行
U 组与 A 组，C 组与 G 组的每一密码的符号都隔行对应相同。”
我们把这表和本书第九章所画孟德尔遗传因子方阵图相对
比。它反映出和方阵隔行相对变化的数理规律是同一的。J、
K、L、M、N、0、P、Q 是数字符号加密的 8 种形式。形成 4
个模块（板）。南这 4 个模块在遗传密码总体（表）中所处
方位的变换，可产生 16 组模块。16 组模块中的每一个模块
方阵，都存在纵横（上下左右）对角间隔对等的性质。每个
小模块又由 4 组密码方阵组成。出为密码由 3 个碱基定 1 个
磷酸。这就构成了遗传方阵 3：1 的数理基础。按遗传方阵
（图 8）3：1 规律，模块就产生隐性和显性的性。它们的整
体隔行（卜下和左右）对角相隔，就产生了整体模块隐性、
显性的整体相间（隔代）遗传性。也就是说，生命遗传存在
以遗传密码为单位的同时，也存在以遗传密码模块大、小方
阵为单位的个体遗传和整体模块遗传的两重性遗传。隐性密
码和显性密码各自都存在着自己“阵”系的连动效应。所以
82遗传密码受遗传方阵的制约。遗传有自己的内在的“阵”法，
它构成了种性制约机制。所以说计算机是种性制约机制的数
理无边际组合变幻的人工再现，是生物智能的数理运用和再
现。”——摘自《给你创新的支点》（68 页 ）2003 年 科
学普及出版社
科学实验已经完全证明“遗传密码受遗传方阵的制约。
遗传有自己的内在的‘阵’法” ：从麦克林托克发现转座因
子的科学实验可以看出， “跳跃基因”是在玉米粒成熟时期
才可能出现的现象，其本质是林奈物种种性整体不变和薛定
谔生命永远依赖“负熵”生存之整体生命的一致性。-DNA
序列脱离了-DNA 双螺旋的线性轨迹，它的意义不仅仅在于
DS——AC 调控系统揭示了生命的整体，而在于揭示了遗传密
码的另一种“整体跳跃”排列表达方式，是对双螺旋线性 DNA
排列形态整体的突破。这从凯恩斯的定向变异，可得到进一
步证明。巴巴拉·麦克林托克当时就著文《玉米易突发位点
的由来与行为》、《染色体结构和基因表达》，强调说： “操
纵子模型和她的 DS——AC 系统实在太相似了。”到了 70 年
代，由于莫诺基因整体学说在基因整体控制方面的研究吸引
了人们对“跳跃基因”整体的重新认识，线性基因确起来基
因密码无法改变整体板块基因密码的存在，才能科学解释被
称为转座因子的整体移动遗传因子在生物体内广泛存在，进
一步说明整体板块“跳跃基因”现象整体性内涵。1983 年为
83了表彰麦克林托克发现“跳跃因子整体性”的贡献，被授予
诺贝尔奖。
跳跃基因是突变产生的另一种整体链性整体形式，基因
能在细菌之间线性传播，转座因子也能在其它物种之间整体
“跳跃”传递，转座子不仅能在基因组内部和基因组之间跳
跃，染色体自己有时也完全自发地进行整体重排。这往往与
环境压力有关，麦克林托克用 X 射线照射玉米，诱发玉米“跳
跃基因”色斑整体突变的实验，就让我们又回到环境，包含
产生突变的变异的微观环境与“微生态”内外环境本质上来，
这和穆勒用 X 射线照射小鼠诱发整体突变（死亡）本质相同；
不同的只是麦克林托克发现了一段基因-DNA 序列的整体跳
跃现象、插入导致的基因排列整体重组，而诱发生物性状变
异或突变的“微生态变异”生物体整体死亡规律，遗憾的是
人肉眼却永远看不见基因的“整体跳跃”现象，导致穆勒“突
变致死”结论，引爆微生态变异死亡全过程的“生物危害”
整体性灾难！……
四 破解整体板块遗产密码
我们反反复复地看《给你创新的支点》一书，仔细研读，
猛然发现破解“整体板块遗产密码”的密匙，就在这本书中
的字里行间。可以看出，这把解密的钥匙，分解成几个片段，
穿插在书上并不关联、又很不显眼的页码内，隐藏得很深很
深，不仔细研读，很难破解 。自己只谈几句无头无头无尾
8485
的隐语，让人看不出经典理论的章法，只有破碎支离的神秘
的和难懂的灰色，可谓真人不露面：
1、我们只要把书中的这些片段剪辑下来。重新
组合
立刻恍然大悟。原来脉络是这样清晰可见，立刻找到了破解
整体板块遗产密码的密匙。
2、 后面“密码遗传表”反复研究一下，表面看他和
1950 年的遗传密码表一模一样，仔细看才能发现他多了 64
个字母。秘密就在这六十四个字母上，
3、让我简化一下，把字母前的碱基全部删除，就得到“整
体板块遗传密码表“。
这表就是钥匙。整体板块遗传密码的所有规律、法则尽
在其中。
4、横竖对角间隔遗传是遗传的普遍形式。其可分整体
间隔遗传，和个体间隔遗传。E 板块间隔遗传决定着种性的
稳定。它的主要数码规律是 a 基因密码存在四大基准（四方
连续）模块，即 KJK、NONO、LMLM、PQPQ 每个板块内的基因
是最亲和的。它构成线性基因的基础。
B 板块是基因排序规律昭示。如果说个体是太阳系小宇
宙体系的辰星，四方连续构成的就是大宇宙体系、种群。
D 四方连续整体板块密码方阵可以通过八方连续、16 方、
32 方连续构成复杂的板块基因图谱。这是一个主题三位武器
哦能够变幻的图谱。它才是生命多样性的源泉。86
5、我们从书第页码板块基因数理变幻的数学公式是□
×4 ，我们把公式展开□是遗传方阵的数理学的孟德尔的
3:1 的用法 3:1（3:1）4=3×4:1×4（n 是自然数列 1、2、3、
4、5、……）.显然，这是一个到几个展开公式生命整体板
块遗传繁殖的数理变形规律。它揭示了生命存在板块遗传繁
殖和板块灭绝的神奇效应。它的爆发力度比斐波那契数列更
猛，构成了生命螺旋线（正或负）的强力趋势。在极短时间
内出现生命大爆发和生命大灭绝以及神秘消失的生命自然
现象。这就是强燕平成功预言。2003 年非典和 2010 年甲流
神秘消失的数理法则根据。我们用电脑合成描绘出整体板块
基因三维立体模型可直观整体板块遗传密码的玄妙尽在其
中了。
五 从孟德尔遗传方阵演绎导出 Q-J 方程式
“
从上面的公式我们就能看出：方阵中的一个小方
阵吕：是按 3：1 数理规律产生黑乌，鸦（杂种）的。这种
小方阵我们用口表示。口 X4：就是四个小方阵，它的白黑乌
鸦的比就是 12：4。口 X42 白黑乌鸦的比就是 48：16。以此
类推为 192：48、786：1 92……它们分别为 4 方阵、16 方
阵等等……从这种几何遗传增殖变化，还可以看到每一级数
向高一级的级数变化过程中，白乌鸦（级数）都构成下一遗
传方阵黑乌鸦（杂种）的基数。例 48：1 6，48 是下一代（方
阵）192：48 的基数，同理 192（白）构成 786：1 92（黑）的基数。以此类推，这种规律就体现出杂种在演化过程中基
底性极强的遗传繁殖作用。这是一个支点。它可以解释东亚
飞蝗在某一地域，猝然在，极短的时间内繁殖到每平方米成
千上万的灾害性突变，就是这方阵遗传的级数的变化。这是
马尔萨斯人口论所强调的人口按几何级数增长的实证。所
以，如果我们带一只黑乌鸦，一旦能在自然选择中存在下来，
就能成为白乌鸦种群的佼佼者，即使黑乌鸦羽毛（白色性状）
不能得到遗在下代杂种中显现，但其他性状有利于种性演化
的性状，也会在杂种的后代中隐性存在，成为种性演化的优
势，起到种性演化优胜的隐性作用，会在未来的某代杂种中
突然显现，这种变异是漫长的、潜伏的，是种性制约的结果。
这就是说黑乌鸦会成为白乌鸦种性演化的积极因子，是所
有杂种共有的属性。
生命演化是在生存斗争中进行自然选择多完成的，包括
人工选择过程的性状变异和遗传来现的，演化的优劣集中
体现在繁殖产生的后代杂种的品相， ”——《给你创
新的支点》强燕平编著 科学普及出版社 2003 年
我们就是这样运用孟德尔遗传方阵，研究演绎“黑
乌鸦会成为白乌鸦种性演化的积极因子”整合 3:1 生
命数理和斐波那契数列等推导、演绎出 Q-J 方程。
六、 关于 Q-J 方程““四维模式”生殖”潜秘斐波
那契数理之讨论
8788
从孟德尔 3:1 繁殖变化中，可以看到每一级数向
高一级的级数变化过程中，白乌鸦（级数）都构成下
一遗传方阵黑乌鸦（杂种）的基数。例 48：16，48
是下一代（方阵）192：48 的基数，同理 192（白）
构成 786：192（黑）的基数。以此类推，这种规律就
体现出杂种在演化过程中基底性极强的遗传繁殖爆
发力。
它揭示了斐波那契数列并不是马尔萨斯《人口
论》所说的繁殖几何基数。
因为：
A 斐波那契数列 13、21、34、55……是通过加某一自
然数来完成的，有人为选择。大自然不会有这样人为
的自然数列！如：
3x4 二 12; +1 二 13
Sx4=20; + I 二 21
8 x4 二 32;+2 二 34
13x4 二 52; +3 二 55……
B: 2 n = 2、4、8、16……2 n几何数列基数不能产生生
命突然爆发或者突然灭绝效应。
C：只有 W=
×4 n符合孟德尔原理。事实上，定律是为实践和事实所证明，反映事物在一
定条件下发展变化的客观规律的论断。定律是一种理
论模型，它用以描述特定情况、特定尺度下的现实世
界，在其它尺度下可能会失效或者不准确。没有任何
一种理论可以描述宇宙当中的所有情况，也没有任何
一种理论可能完全正确。
七、Q-J 方程式在 SARS 疫情大数据应用与 SARS 疫情
验证
SARS 聚集传染（整体板块遗传繁殖律）数学式
中国广东佛山近郊。2002 年 11 月 16 日某村干部
庞××突患一种怪病，症状是发热、干咳、高热 38°
以上不退，肺部有阴影。与此同时，间断、连续在不
同的广南地域、不同市、县；在彼此互不接触的生态
条件下，广东 7 市、县（在 2002 年 11 月 16 日、2002
年 12 月 15 日、2002 年 12 月 21 日、2002 年 12 月 26
日、2003 年 1 月 5 日、2003 年 1 月 22 日、2003 年 1
月 30 日）相隔 76 天中，发现 7 例输入性原发同种病
例。这就是后来认定的非典型肺炎。前面我们已经讨
论过，这肯定不是世界上存在的第一例（原发）非典
病例。对这 7 病例的传染模式进行统计，我们发现 SARS
存在整体板块遗传繁殖（律）属性，经统计其传染数
字证明符合 J－Q 方程表述的整体板块遗传繁殖（律）
8990
数学式；它和新加坡 2 月 20 日到 3 月 20 日某疫区四
病例传染数学式基本相同。请看下面的图表：
年、月、日
姓名
年
龄
性
别
职
业
症 状
地 点
治疗、转院
传染――人数
J－Q 旋线
2002、11、
16
庞××
15
男
村 干
部
发热、干
咳，高烧
不退，肺
部有阴
影。
佛 山 石
湾镇
石 湾 镇 医
院 → 佛 山
市 第 一 医
院，首先怀
疑禽流感，
与 35 种必
须 上 报 的
传 染 病 均
不相符。
11 月 27 日传染其
舅母，11 月 30 日
传染舅母的丈夫，
12 月 1 日庞妻受
传染，12 月 4 日
舅母的女儿（21
岁）传染。4 人。
2002、12、
15
10 点
黄××
35
男
厨师
5 天前发
烧，高烧
40°，呕
吐 、 干
咳，肺部
有阴影。
河源市
紫 金 县 柏
埔 镇 医 院
→ 河 源 市
人 民 医 院
急 内 一 病
区 → 广 州
军 区 总 医
院（第三天
下午）
12 月 24 日，4 护
士受传染，12 月
25 日叶钧强医生
受传（烧 39°，
白血球不高，二天
后双肺阴影），内
一科先后 8 名医
护人员受传染，男
3 人、女 5 人、3
位转重。
2002、12、
21
郭××
40
男
出 租
车 司
机
高烧、干
咳，气管
内有“玻
璃样改
变”
河源市
广 州 军 区
总 医 院 →
呼 吸 研 究
所，广州医
学 院 附 属
第 一 人 民
医 院 呼 吸
疾 病 研 究
所。
A、青壮年医护人
员（老人、儿童不
易感染）；B、同
一科室，同一时期
感染（聚集性）；
C、血象白细胞不
高，血、痰、骨髓
未发现致病菌。
2002、12、
26
练××
34
男
医师
高烧、干
咳，入院
即 重 病
出 现 低
氧 综 合
症
中山市
中 山 市 医
院
1 月 4 日练患者的
医生发烧，4 名医
务人员受传染91
2003、1、5 ×××
33
男
厨工
同 练 症
相同
中山市
中 山 市 中
医院
到 1 月 20 日此例
病已传到 28 例，
男 10 人 ，女 18
人，医务人员 13
人（除去练传染 4
人，合计传染 24
人）
2003、1、
22
黄××
49
男
干部
发烧，肺
有阴影
广州
广 州 省 中
医 院 门 诊
→ 转 抢 救
室。
与黄××接触的
6 名医务人员受
传染，发病。
2003、1、
30
周老板
36
男
老板
相同
广州
广 州 中 山
大 学 附 属
第二医院。
传染医务人员 56
人（3 人死亡），
传染探亲亲属 24
人，合计 80 人。
2003、2、1
10 时
周老板
36
男
老板
相同
广州
转 入 中 山
三院
李建国（呼内科主
任）于 2 月 4 日发
现 8 位同事发烧
被传染。第二天李
建国也被传染（9
人）；2 月 6 日已
传染 18 人。
2003、2、3 阿静
29
女
医生
相同
广州
三 院 住 院
孕妇，6 日
开 始 38 °
高 烧 （ 22
楼产科）。
3 月 14 日羊水破
裂。
2003、2、6 周老板
36
男
老板
相同
广州
转 入 岭 南
楼 12 － 呼
吸内科。
使呼吸科和肾内
科两科室 41 人传
染，创造了全科室
全传染的首例—
—典型整体板块
遗传繁殖。ICU 重
症监护室全体无
一幸免，全室医生
护士全部传染（人
数不详）。组长专
家黄子通因抢救
范亦受传染，合计
40 人）。到了 3
月 1 日前，17、18、
16、15、14，五层
楼的病房均住满
非典病人，医务人
员被传染 93 人，
最后连付院长也
被传染。中山二医
院非典病人住院
2003、2、
17
范信德
2 月 1
日被传
染
30
男
司机
相同
广州
2 月 1 日住
进 中 山 楼
－17 楼，2
月 10 日病
重 转 岭 南
楼－15 楼。92
传染共 103 人，达
到了整体板块遗
传繁殖的 D 梯度
峰值数，与新加坡
某疫区 103 人基
本相同。
2003 年
2 月 20－25
日
A 小姐
相同
香 港 京 华
酒店，陈笃
生 医 院 —
— 新 加 坡
5A － 8A 病
房 传 染 21
人。
3 月 1 日－
3 月 10 日
B 护士
陈 笃 生 医
院 8A 病房
传染23人。
3 月 1 日－
3 月 10 日
C 女士
8A 病 房 传
染 23 人。
2003 年 3
月 5 日－20
日
D 老人
新 加 坡 A5
病 房 后 转
新 加 坡 总
医院 57 病
房 传 染 40
人。
图表分析：①、图中广东四市县首例非典病人共 7 例（阿静、
范信德非首发）。其中老板 1 人、干部 2 人、司机 1 人、厨
师（工）3 人。年龄均在 30--49 之间，均男性。治疗期间均
有过多次转院治疗（同院亦有转科室、病房记录）。其传染
近距离接触者（人数）均符合整体板块遗传繁殖定律数学公
式：J-Q=（3：1）×4 n 。庞××传染 4 人，属 J-Q 的 A（12：
4）梯度、黄××传染 8 人处于 J-Q 的 A（12：4）梯度、郭
××传染 4 人处于 J-Q 的 A（12：4）梯度、陈××传染 4 人
处于 J-Q 的 A（12：4）梯度、×××传染 24 人处于 J-Q 的
B（48：16）梯度；黄××传染 6 人，处于 J-Q 的 A（12：4）
梯度；周老板传染：①、8 人处于 J-Q 的 A（12：4）梯度；
②、传染 41 人符合 J-Q 的 B（48：16）梯度，③、传染 103
人，符合 J-Q 的 C（192：48）梯度。（上述传染人数都是在
互相无接触.在不同地、市（县）、医院发生的。这种数学
模式和新加坡某疫区的传染数学模式完全相同：即 A 小姐传
染 21 人-——J-Q 的 B（48：16）梯度、B 护士传染 23 人—
—J-Q-的 B（48：16）梯度、C 女士传染 23 人——J-Q 的 B
（48：16）梯度、均处于（48：16）的中间数 24 人。D 老人
传染 40 人——J-Q 的 B（48：16）梯度。整体传染 107 人—
—J-Q（192：48）的 C 梯度（见图）。这已充分地证明了 J-Q
数学公式的科学性。（我们于 4 月 10 日在疫情发生过程中，
已把整体板块遗传繁殖律理论和 J-Q=（4：1）×4 n 数学方93
程式报告给国务院防非典领导小组和相关医院。见“验方”
一文）。此理论最早出自《给你创新的支点》书稿——2001
年 9 月 10 日签约。该书于 2003 年 3 月中旬出版。见该书 83
页--84 页。梯度，是整体板块遗传繁殖律固有的属性，是生
命演化形成的生态能聚集的量度，是整体的生命活力增长的
概率。它的运行轨迹构成了广谱的生命正（负）螺旋线增长
态势。整体板块遗传繁殖律是生物有机体任何一物种（个体）
固有数理特征的繁殖与自卫的本能：①、2003 年 4 月 10 日
我们提出微生态疗法（见“验方”）防治非典。生命的本质
是微生态（熵）环境制约产生的生命、能量、平衡运动、演
化的产物，任何环境都是由微生态的无穷（无穷小微生态）
集合构成的。所以微生态小环境的改变决定着生命运动的状
态，它是微小生命状态，对整体生命现象的“蝴蝶效应”。
可见“首先破坏非典病灶初试企图形成的准整体板块遗传
繁殖的人体微生态小环境能有效制止 SARS 在人体的深层次
感染引发的整体板块遗传繁殖。所以，我们提出：只“要控
制了 SARS 病毒的整体板块遗传繁殖，我们就控制了非典疫
情”（二专利）。图表中三个病例（庞××、阿静、周老板）
都是由于意外的生理变异（腹泻、呕吐、羊水破）改变了该
病人的生命微生态小环境，从而改变、终止了 SARS 的整体
板块遗传繁殖状态，而神奇地在短时间治愈出院的。两千年
前，中医就建立了（人体）微生态疗法的三大机理：发汗、
腹泻、呕吐。事实上，任何药物都是从改变人体微生态小环
境和基因生态来达到治疗作用的。“本生通道效应”为这种
治疗提供了（微观）物理存在的生命运动（微观空间）的本
能。所以希波克拉底强调： “病人的本能就是病人的医生，
医生是帮助他的本能的 ”。历史实践证明，微生态疗法是
没有病的时候治病（“不治已病治未病”），以小博大的防
治理念与治疗准则，是人体微生态整体板块遗传繁殖律所规
定的铁律！
10 月 27 日我们偶然看到刘双、朱小玲等主编的《SARS 临
床病例及影像分析》。书中第一次公开北京市三例输入性非
典病例传染数字。仅抄摘如下：
A、
3 月初北京第一例输入性 SARS 患者感染两家医院的
20 名医务人员（家属 2 人死亡）。与中山市×××传
染 24 人同属 B 梯度。
B、
3 月中旬北京第二例 SARS 输入性患者对另一家医院
在 10－30 天感染 20－80 人。与周老板前期传染 18－40 人 B94
梯度相同。C 病例传染 80 人、周老板传染 103 人，同属 C 梯
度。
C、
4 月上旬某大学教授到某医院看病感染上 SARS,又
到另一个医院治疗感染该医院 19 人（均见该书 16 页）。与
A 病例同新加坡——A 小姐、B 护士、C 女士的 21 人、23 人、
23 人数极相近。
从广州地区、新加坡某疫区、北京市 SARS 传染数学式
的对比可见，北京市的三例（某三个不同地区的医院）首发
输入 SARS 病例的传染人数和广东六病例、新加坡一病区四
病例传染模式（被传染人数字）达到惊人的相同。这再一次
证明了 J－Q 方程的准确与科学性。我们用 J－Q 方程对美国
2003 年夏季突发的西尼罗病毒传染人数（数学模式）进行预
测也相当准确……
第四章 《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回顾
题记：关于“孟德尔经典遗传学“整体板块遗传律”丰
富内涵”最早刊载在《给你创新的支点》强燕平著 （科学
普及出版社 2003 年 3 月）因时间已经历 20 年之久，该书已
经绝版；我们遂摘选九到十一章节；这是原版的五个章节作
为本书第二章-第六章的内容，以陈述、证明我们发现《整
体板块遗传律》生命科学基础理论 20 年前的由来与发现原
理的来龙去脉：我们说《给你创新的支点》是“整体板块遗
传律”整体生命学理论原理的起源……
九、修道院里诞生的生命数论（按原版书章序号）：
支点的发现有时是带有一定的偶然性，但确立和证明支
点的过程却往往要经历艰苦而漫长的努力，有时甚至需要几
代人的艰辛努力和有时不被承认的痛苦煎熬。失败是科学创
新的家常便饭，因此，长期的不懈努力，坚定的自信和必胜
的决心是一个成功者所必需的先决条件。敢于创新，敢于否定自己又往往是成功的关键。科学的发展是在不断发现、不
断否定不断创新的，相互交叉、相互推动中向前发展的。科
学创新又往往是在多学科交又研究，相互引证中得以完成
的。
中世纪神学与科学的混杂，对于当时科学发展的前沿欧
洲来说是很普遍的现象，这在哥白尼身上体现得十分完美，
科学与神学、修道院往往混为-一谈。关于修道院我们只能
从雨果的《巴黎圣母院》中得到一些感性认识，可那是神父
与奴仆对爱情迷恋的典型，其描述更多的是永恒的爱情。奥
地利布隆城奥古斯丁派圣托马斯修道院，却给世人留下了另
一番情景，我们在那里可以寻找到生物数论的影子和源流。
自柏拉图以来，数学和物理学、天文学、化学都是相
互脱离的，作为某一科学门类的起源，虽说是必然如此，可
到了 18 世纪中叶，各科学门类的联系已经很明显地表露出
来。最典型的例证是伊萨克·牛顿为了认识天体宇宙的引力
结构，分析极小的空间与时间的间隔，竞用了近 10 年的时
间研究数学，他要找到一种得心应手的数学工具，以便更好
地推动自己的研究进展。也因此以研究力学为美的牛顿，中
途却发现并创立了著名的微积分一一个数学分支的伟大成
果，其后为发现推导万有引力定律，提供了数理基础。
虽然物理学家胡克最先发现了引力与距离平方的反
比关系，但由于他没有做出数学上的充分证明，而使发现唇
95有引力定律的桂冠落在了牛顿的头上。伊蕊克·牛顿成了经
典力学的鼻祖。物理学和数学的交叉研究，使牛顿在力学与
微积分学的研究中相得益彰，在其研究成果中已十分清楚地
表现出来。
让我们先从奥地利布隆市圣托马斯修道院说起。今天来
看圣托马斯修道院已经没有当年的规模，可是作为遗传科学
的发祥地，我们仍能看到那不大不小可耕作的实验园地。就
是这块 200 平方米原奥地利土壤和一个小的温室，为世界上
杰出的生物遗传学家孟德尔的辛勤耕耘提供了宝贵的研究
空间。为什么能在这片土地上产生今天 DNA 生物遗传密码的
原论？显然这离不开圣托马斯修道院院长耐普对科学的执
著追求和热爱，离不开他对孟德尔的器重和培养。
1851 年 10 月耐普推荐孟德尔到当时欧洲第一流的维也
纳大学学习深造，这使他能亲聆多普勒名师的教海，走进道
尔顿原子论的科学前沿。历史要在圣托马斯修道院打造遗传
的诺亚方舟，给孟德尔提供了邦拉的昆虫知识和温格都的植
物观点。当刚刚结束了两年的维也纳大学生活的孟德尔回到
修道院的时候，孟德尔已经不是当初步入圣托马修道院时的
没有高级中学‘教师资格'的普通修道士了。他已是一个具
有教师资格的布隆高等技术学院生物、物理教师，孟德尔的
豌豆杂交实验，也是在这个时候开始的，从比孟德尔开始了
教书和科学实验的漫长生涯。
96在牛顿故居的墙上有一首有理念寓意的小诗： “自然和
自然规律都隐藏在黑暗的夜间…”他明确地告诫我们科学发
现、创新的支点存在于茫茫的大自然奥秘之中。一科学发现
就如同在暗夜行路一样，当科学的骄子在坎坷的暗夜中行走
的时候，坚强的毅力和勇气会在暗夜中激发和点燃灵感迸发
出创新智慧的火花。孟德尔的创新支点产生于他内在心灵的
震动，惟-~能使孟德尔心灵震动的就是他去维也纳大学之前
曾失去‘教师资格’。在这痛苦的时刻，坚定的信念和对科
学的不懈追求反挤压出他心灵深处的智慧三光，这光在黑夜
中一经闪现，就会把黑暗全部驱散，产生出科学的新时代。
当然，这需要条件、需要时间，需要艰苦的努力，孟德尔从
维也纳一回到圣托马斯修道院，就·立刻投入到豌豆杂交的
实验之中。
为什么孟德尔杂交实验选用了豌豆而不是其他植物
呢？就选定使用豌豆作为植物杂交的品种，也是一个科学创
新的成功支点。
孟德尔在维也纳大学期间，参加了维也纳学术机构动植
物学会，同当时著名的植物学家柯拉有过密的交往，对植物
的种类有着深刻的认识，用今天的眼光来考察，如果孟德尔
用豌豆以外的任何植物来做自己的杂交实验，这种带有数理
的生物变异规律就不能从孟德尔手中发现，这就是孟德尔的
豌豆之谜。
97本书的开篇就提出了进行思维方式的变换，这就是说不
要围绕和只跟着别人的思路前进。要去寻找那些隐秘：科学
暗夜的东西，要去发现对科学研究最关键的拐点，构成科学
金字塔的最辉煌的支点，孟德尔选用豌豆作为杂交实验的品
种，正是他科学实验成功的基础。
当时遗传学刚刚起步，像第谷以前的天文学家一样，
都是用研究者自己的眼睛直接观察宇宙星体。生物学家也只
能用肉眼来直接观察植物生长的变化过程，对植物遗传进行
研究。这就要求实验的植株有明显的特点以利于研究者进行
直接的观察。豌豆的红白花，黄绿叶，高矮植株和黄绿豆夹
果实，圆皱…特色都有很强的反差，易于观察。此外豌豆的
生命力强，相对生长期短，花的雄蕊环抱雌蕊，除去雄蕊，
异花授粉十分方便，是肉眼观察最理想的杂交实验品种。
据说英国的奈特是第一个用豌豆进行杂交实验的人，也
是第一个发现豌豆种子有些灰白显性性状，并在第二代得到
显现得遗传规律的人，其后维尔莫兰，诺丹也在豌豆杂交过
程中发现了显性和性状分离的现象。可是，他们都没有运用
数学方法进行研究，忽略了数理、数论在生物学中隐秘的内
在规律，这里面就有个站在巨人肩膀上的支点学问…其实这
奥秘就是在生物学的内在规律之中隐秘着数理、数论的问
题。
西方自亚里士多德以来就开始了数论的研究，欧洲古代
98最知名的数学大师，阿基米德就是研究大数最早的专家，他
留下的牧牛题经过了 2000 多年，仍无人能够解答。阿基米
德是个数学奇才，他既发出了用一个支点撬动整个地球的感
慨，又留下了用整个西西里岛屿无法放牧无边际的牛群的思
考。可见，西方的数论注重于实际，以具体的数字排列顺序
或第次寻找某种物象的规律：而东方的数理，更重视理性在
数学上的体现，寻找以理规范数字的法则。中国古籍宝典《诗
经》上就说： “一物有一物的法则。”引导人们养成以数理
（法铡）统观大自然的理性，这就是古代先哲们的良苦用心。
可见中国古代数学数理在世界处于领先的地位。古代的《周
髀算经》、《孙子算经》就是有文字记载以来中国最早数学
理性的总结。
东方数理和西方数论本质是相通的。它们都有共同的数
字起源， “一”是万物之源。所以孟德尔的豌豆之谜。只有
到数理数论的简单规律中去寻找。也就是说，到生物性状的
变化中寻找，按照数字数理规律制约变异的法则。这就是说
植物（豌豆）的性状变化，即是种的个体按数学简单规则变
化为制约，又是随机的。因为任何植物的个体杂交，都是漫
长的，必须消磨研究者宝贵的年华，这里的计数单位，是以
年为基数的，这是由种植到结果的周期所规定。.事实上孟
德尔的实验种植整整用了 10 年时间，才得出了自己认为科
学的结论。没有必定成功的理念，没有超人的毅力，没有甘
99耐寂寞的苦斗精神，任何人都无法完成这样年年不间断的实
验。特别是当孟德尔的实验结果理论在 1865 年公布后，而
又长期得不到人们认可的漫长岁月中，孟德尔依然坚持不懈
地进行试验、研究。锲而不舍，这才是难能可贵的孟德尔精
神。
让我们重新回到孟德尔豌豆之谜上来，这需要从达尔文
的物种起源说起。豌豆杂交是人工选择，可为什么反映出了
自然选择的规律呢？
因为自然选择比人工选择更优越，这是达尔文进化论的
核心部分，人工选择和自然选择是相通的。遗传是选择的过
程，是种如何传递的过程，种性的遗传是通过种的个体延续
性来体现的。所以，关键是种的个体与种性间断又连续的关
系：同样，种的变异也是通过种的个体存在，这就决定了个
体的遗传变异必须在种的制约下完成，这就是说生物种遗传
存在不可违背的某种独特的种性，.这种性在种的个体中来
实现他的种性制约，·这种制约机制才是遗传的本质，才是
生物的演化机理。在生物演化过程中，在保证了种性制约的
前提下，其他一切性状选择，对于种的个体发展来说才是自
由的、随机的。
这是否意为生物演化存在“种性制约机制” ，答案应该
是肯定的，这是生物种延续的必然，为了保证生物某一种的
延续，必须以强制的延续规范才能把种性最基本的核心在个
100体中保留下来，才能保证不在同其他个体的交配、繁殖中被
淹没，带来种的灭绝。同样，生物个体的变异、适应、选择
繁殖的个体生存过程，都是在种性的制约下实现的，离开了
种性制约，种的个体将被种性淘汰。种性不仅有保存种性于
种的个体的机制，也有淘汰超越种性的个体的机制，这种机
制并非是单纯的遗传，遗传与制约并存，遗传包括着严格的
种性制约，这种机制存在于种的个体繁殖、生育、生长、发
育，直到生命终结的整个阶段。他随时抗御着非种性的性状
产生，无论是自然选择，.还是人工选择都是在种性制约机
制下的选择。通过种性制约机制，对于种的个体的遗传进行
全方位、全天候的制约。
遗传对于任何机制的制约都不是瞬间的、随时的、随
机的，生物种的恒定衍生，更不是瞬间的、随时的、随机的。
种机制一旦形成就永恒存在，永恒制约，任何种的种性都具
有这种特性。孟德尔的豌豆杂交，正是反映了种性制约机
制。.·
遗传只能是种性制约机制的一部分，孟德尔羯示了种性
制约遗传规律还存在种性制约繁殖、种性制约变异、种性制
约选择。物种在种性制约机制下分离和自由组合的繁殖、遗
转、~变异、选择共同构成了种性制约机制，这样才能保证
龙生龙、凤生风。保证种的个体不在同其他个体的交配、繁
殖中被淹没、被淘汰、被灭绝。这种种性制约同时也是造成
101生物种的演化达不到顶点，达不到至全至美的原因。这正说
明为什么人的眼睛不能像鹰的眼睛一样犀利，比苍蝇和蜻蜓
的眼晴构造和视力逊色。人的嗅觉比不上狗的嗅觉灵敏，弹
跳的高度比不上跳蚤（按自身重量比）跳的高度的百分之一，
人类善跑的功能不及梅花鹿等等，即高级动物的某一器官不
能达到生物演化的项点。因为人的种性制约不允许人的眼晴
选择鹰眼的演化模式，人的嗅觉器官同样受人的种性制约，
不能选择狗的嗅觉器官的性状即使这种性状比人的嗅觉高
多少倍，存在优越性，但和人的其他器官功能相组合的匹配
中，这种性状是不被允许存在的)，同样道理人的双腿的变
异，也不可能达到像梅花鹿四条腿的善跑性状、自然也就限
制了双腿的跳跃功能。所以遗传是种性制约的遗传，选择也
是种性制约下的选择，在种性制约的允许范围内有种的个体
的自然选择，：火工选择同样也不能超越种性的制约。同理，
性状和变异都受种性制约，在种性制约允许的范围内产生种
的个体的性状变异、这种种性制约的遗传、选择、变异、性
状、繁殖的局限性，.就制约了种的突变性、物竞天择、用
进废退只能在隔代的微小变异中发生选择作用，和在隔代的
极少数量的个体中显现性状微小的差异。这就规定了孟德尔
遗传定律的三比一原则，这样才能解释新的突变个体常常被
淹没的原因。
很多物种的稀有的、新的突变个体，往往在与正常交配
102所产生的种群中被隔代淹没，产生隔代灭绝的主要原因就是
种性制约机制。以热带鱼的珍品红眼金孔雀为例，他虽然是
孔雀鱼中变异后的产物，但只要把它同一群普通孔雀鱼同养
一缸，红眼的变异性状就会隔代消失，使红眼变为黑眼。因
为当红眼金孔雀混入普通孔雀鱼之后，受普通孔雀鱼种性制
约，红眼金孔雀与孔雀鱼性状将受到这种制约的限制，很少
产生交配。即使产生杂交，红眼金孔雀鱼能使其性状保持隔
代遗传的概率仅在三分之一。所以第一代杂种红眼金孔雀鱼
在普通金孔雀鱼种性制约下，只能按 1/2 等差级数递减，三
四代后将被黑眼晴金孔雀鱼种淹没而灭绝。如果相反，把部
分黑眼晴金孔鱼，放入红眼睛金 64 孔鱼的种群中，也会由
于红眼晴金孔雀鱼种性制约，是黑眼晴金孔雀鱼被种性制约
淹没灭绝。这并不是杂交性状不稳定造成的，.是种性制约
机制的必然，而且遗传本身也是受种性约机制严格限定的。
所以，遗传（在杂交过程中）的自由组合是种性制约下的种
的个体性状的自由组合。同样遗传（在杂交过程中）的分离，
也是种性制约下的种的个体性状的分离。这种严格限定表现
在数理上就是孟德尔发现的三比一恒定值。
为什么是三比一，而不是
二比一，或者是四比一、五
比一呢？他遵循的是哪一种
数字规则呢？3 是最小的奇
103素数、1 是最小的奇数，也就是说生物性状杂交的遗传组合，
是大自然数列中最小的奇素数和最小的奇数比 3：1，这种比
在自然数中只有一个，也仅仅只有一个。这就是生物性特色。
也就是说二代杂交的性状分离或组合比，必须具有最小的奇
数和最小的奇素数的数理性。最小的奇数是 1，是不能再分
的正整数，最小的奇素数是 3，是不能再有小于它的奇素数，
含有本来固有的数理性，即种性最本质的数字化表述的事物
的最基本成分。最小的正整数决定了性状的计数最小单位，
也就是说性状的自由组合和分离只能以 1 为单位进行，表现
为 1：1：1：1，只有这样才能保证父母系性 65 状的完整无
损，像多数胎生的卵细胞在胚胎中都以 1 存在，而精细胞却
以不小与 3 的数比与之交配，父母亲的性状是以完整的最基
本的整体性，进入分离或选择的全过程杂交进行的，而且这
种配比是以大自然 M:M≈3：1 数字比最完善，接近黄金分割
比的形式体现的，以保证生命的完美。因为大自然再也找不
到除此之外的最小奇素数，同时再也找不到除此以外的最小
奇数，这种数理性就规定了生命的繁殖，以密码存在的最小
范围，选择变异的种性安全，保证了性状的种性遗传的可操
作性，同时也规范了种的变异的简单序列，·这是简单性原
则在生命繁殖过程的体现，实现种性最基本成分的种在种的
个体繁衍中，不产生丝毫本质性差异，从而实现种的延续，
这种十分艰难而漫长的生物自然工程使种的灭绝变得十分
104漫长，十分困滩，甚至不可能灭绝，这是保存种性生命无限
延长的需要。反过来就构成种性制约机制，·这就是种性数
理制约的秘密。
生物遗传自然工程以最小的奇数和最小的奇素数比
展开，为什么会形成无限繁纷复杂，没有绝对相同的个体存
在的千变万化的奇异变数呢？
这从构成现代计算机数理变化中可以得到启示。目前计
算机的功能发展到异乎寻常的神奇，广泛运用在人类科学与
生活的各个领域，可他的数理机制是那样的简单。是 0 和 1
的二进制，是以数理变换的有限性为始，达到无限集合的 0
和 1 的无穷变幻。这和 1 和 3 的生物二进制遗传数理变换是
极其相似的，0 在自然数列中表示空位，可以是任何自然数，
1 是最小奇数，也是最小正整数，0 小于 1、也（可以）能大
于 1，这就构成了计算机无穷变幻的最小数理变换机制。1
和 3 应该是最简单物的生物种性演化数理的自然体现。他们
都有共同的属性：以最小的有限性展开无穷大的变换模式，
无边际的变换相位、无终点循环数论机制的特征。
我们也可以在用二进制 0 和 1 排列的遗传密码表中证实
这一问题（表 1）。我们先从以下 5 个英文字母谈起，先看
一下 A、T、U 和 C、G 这五个英文字母的含意：C=胞嘧啶脱
氧核糖核苷酸 U 二尿嗜啶核苷酸
T=胸腺嘧啶脱氧核糖核苷酸
105A=腺嘌呤脱氧核糖核苷酸
G=鸟嘌呤脱氧核糖核苷酸
C、U、T、A、G 是组成遗传密码的最小的密钥字母。根据三
比一配对的数理和查伽夫规律。可以把这五个密钥字母分为
两组。A=T=U 和 C=G。我们把这两组密钥字母用菜布尼茨的
二进制数字 0 和 1 变换一下。如：0 一=C=G、1 一=A=T=U。
用变换所得数字的排列和表内的遗传密码相对排列，得到一
张二进制数字 0、1 加密的遗传密码表。·于是我们看到孟
德尔的遗传因子规律又显了出来，我们看到自上而下每三排
密码，从左向右第二第四竖行的符号完全相同。第四排不同，
显出了组密码（群）1：1 的变化规律。从上向下 U、C、A、
G 四组遗传密码，每一组排序都有这样严格的变化规律。而
且，从上向下看，竖行 U 组与 A 组，C 组与 G 组的每一密码
的符号都隔行对应相同。我们把这表和本书第九章所画孟德
尔遗传因子方阵图相对比。它反映出和方阵隔行相对变化的
数理规律是同一的。J、K、L、M、N、O、P、Q 是数字符号加
密的 8 种形式。形成 4 个模块（板）。由这 4 个模块在遗传
密码总体（表）中所处方位的变换，可产生 16 组模块。16
组模块中的每一个小模块方阵，都存在纵横（上下左右）对
角间隔对等的性质。每个小模块又由 4 组密码方阵组成。因
为密码由 3 个碱基决定 1 个磷酸。这就构成了遗传方阵 3：1
的数理基础。按遗传方阵（图 8）3：1 规律，模块就产生隐
106性和显性的属性。它们的整体隔行（上下和左右）对角相隔，
就产生了整体模块隐性、显性的整体相间（隔代）遗传性。
也就是说，生命遗传存在以遗传密码为单位的同时，也存在
以遗传密码模块大、小方阵为单位的个体遗传和整体模块遗
传的两重性遗传。隐性密码和显性密码各自都存在着自己
“阵”系的连动效应。所以遗传密码受遗传方阵的制约。
遗传有自己的内在的“阵”法，它构成了种性制约机制。所
以说计算机是种性制约机制的数理无边际组合变幻的人工
再现，是生物智能的数理运用和再现。
我们还可以从其他侧面来看-一看这支点的发展轨迹，
也许更能够体会到每一学科的漫长而狠巨的发展历程。1955
年夏天，在香山脚下的植物园里，有一小片淡红色的荷花，
引来了许多不平凡的游客，有许多植物学家，都用惊叹的目
光注视着每一朵莲花，这莲花从表面看没什么特别之处，淡
淡的粉红色花瓣，在莲托上亭亭玉立，·偌大的荷叶像一面
蒲扇贴在水面上，托着那粉红色莲花格外醒目，
很少人知道这片荷花其中隐含着一个千古之谜。
表 1 遗 传 密 码 表（二进位数字 0、1 加密）
107原来这小片莲花是两年前中国科学家精心栽培、细心照料的
研究成果，这莲花的种子是三年前在辽宁省新金县沧子屯村
的地下泥炭层中发现的千年古莲子，发现时这些莲子的表皮
108已经在地质沉积的作用下变得十分坚硬，像一个个小铁蛋，
用手不能掰开，科学家只得一点点用锉刀把莲子坚硬的外壳
锉下来，用水泡养起来，莲子竟神奇地发出嫩芽，似乎所有
的莲子都能发芽生长，于是便在植物园里试种。经过两年的
精细培育，莲子真的生出碧绿的荷叶，开出粉红色的鲜艳荷
花。如何认定这是千年莲子呢？主要是用放射性碳-14 对发
现古莲子的泥岩层的岩石测定的结果。经过科学家鉴定，这
莲子大约是在 1000 年前下落在地下的，他和土层一起变养、
沉积形成的。这是 20 年以后才测定证实的。其实这不是最
古老的莲子，1971 年考古学家又在河南郑州大河村柳韶文化
遗址发现了两颗古莲子，经测定有 5000 年的历史，他才是
世界上寿命最长的古莲子。中国有句民谚： “千年草子，万
年鱼子。”生命是永恒的，大自然的永恒就是最完美的生命
赞美诗。
爱情是什么？他是生命的本性。“食色性也。”性生情，
情是生命力的晴雨表。爱情的永恒正是生命永恒的象征。
1966 年 2 月情报专家巴克斯特用测谎仪发现天南星在显示
屏上有和人相同的曲线图形，他经过仔细研究，认定植物和
人一样，同是有感情的，植物和动物一样有喜怒哀乐的情绪
变化，植物活跃的精神生活和整个大自然的生物圈是同步
的，植物同样有两性繁殖，只不过它们有自己的表达方式，
所以大自然的爱是相通的，爱的永恒来自于生命的永恒，世
109界上从没有过没有生命的爱。古今中外文学家赞美的只是生
命力盎然的爱，实际是对生命和生命力的赞美，女性的美全
都表露在生命力最旺盛的青春期，爱情只有存在于青春期才
能燃烧得如火如茶，产生令人迷恋的冲动，这亦是种性制约
的神奇力量。达尔文把性、性欲和繁殖放在演化论的首位。
论证了生物界都存在强大的繁殖力。马尔萨斯的人口论核心
主题是对性欲的定性，它的两条原理之一，就是两性间的情
欲是必然的，而且几乎照现状继续
下去。这就是说，在所有的遗传、变异、选择过程中（无论
任何种的个体在任何漫长的生存斗争过程中)都是把两性问
的情欲，几乎照现状继续下去，这就揭示了种性制约机制不
可变异遗传的核心：两性间的情欲这种性状是按种性制约机
制不变异遗传的，是不存在变异的种性性状，隔代三比一的
自由组合与分离律，不适宜这种种性性状的变异，遗传只能
把种性的这种最基本性状，完完全全地、无需丝毫选择地按
种性制约机制传递到种的所有衍生的个体生命基因中。这正
是马尔萨斯人口论过人之处。过去人们对马尔萨斯的人口论
有过激的曲解、.马尔萨斯论证的人口增长。（不仅仅是指
人类人口增长，应该是所有动物的增长）是按几何数 2、4、
6、8…增长的，而食物（主要是植物性含物)则是按算术级
数 1、2、3、4、5…增长的数规，这是大自然普遍存在的自
然法则，这里还有一个增长周期，即动物的几何级数增长周
110期，以人为例是 20 年（达到生育能力的平均周期)而植物的
算术级数增长周期，是 3 个月、半年、最多一年（达到开花
结果的平均成熟期）。这种增长周期的悬殊差异已经平衡了
不同级数增长差异。如果把周期增长率计算进去，算术级数
的植物性食物增长，会大大超过几何级数的动物性（人口)
增长水平，这是一个大自然的生态平衡。它体现了大自然的
自然选择（食物与人口)的公平性的和谐完整，所以马尔萨
斯的另一条原理： “食物是人类生存所必需的”同样揭示了
人类生存的基本规律。
中国有句古训： “民以食为天”。这是无需证明的法则。
于是马尔萨斯又揭示了一个不能变异的种性，他和两性同样
是不可变异的，不适宜遗传的变异法则。遗传只能把种性的
这两种最基本性状、完完全全的、无需丝毫选择地按种性制
约机制传递到种衍生的所有个体生命基因之中。中国相传了
几千年的圣训是“食色性也” ，这是对种性制约机制的最早
表述。这样种性制约机制的内涵就制定为食色两性不能变异
的法则。
这种机制对马尔萨斯人口论和达尔文的物种起源，孟德
尔的自由组合与分离律是统一。其实这三个理论，三本书就
是一本书。由于马尔萨斯过分强调生存环境中的资源竞争的
激烈程度和可能引发的灾难的生存斗争的观点。启发了达尔
文的自然选择的生物演化机制和自然选择相对应的是人工
111选择（豌豆杂交）过程中发现了生物遗传过程的数理变化规
律。实际上，马尔萨斯原理是种性制约机制中食色两性不能
变异的法则，达尔文的理论的核心除了包含马尔萨斯原理，
对生物强大的繁殖力的认定的同时，提出了生物界存在变
异，不同的变异（种）对生存斗争有不同的适应能力、发展
了马尔萨斯的生存斗争观点，引入自然选择机制，提出自然
对所有的变种都进行了选择。可达尔文忽略了自然和人工都
不能允许选择的种性制约机制和变异（杂交产生的变种）所
遵循的数理规律。孟德尔从人工选择中获益，接过达尔文的
人工选择思想，用豌豆杂交的人工选择，解决了自然选择和
人工选择过程中生物性状变异过程的数理规律，服从三比一
律法则，从而引入了遗传理论的数理发展（遗传密码），但
孟德尔并没有说明种性的不可变异、自然和人工都不能改变
种性的最基本成分，变种只是种性允许范围内的种的个体次
要性性状的变异，自然选择正是防止这种种性本质变异的机
制，所以他们应该是一本书。事实上也是一本书，由于人的
个体生命决定（人的生命不可能同时有马尔萨斯的绅士经
历，又具有达尔文在贝格尔号的远洋考察历险实践，同时具
备孟德尔神父生活的内向思维)。这本书只能这样分册，不
同地，不同人，却同时期形成，从这三位生命科学家的理论
问世的时间表就能看出，这是同一时期的一本书。达尔文的
《物种起源》发表于 1859 年 11 月 24 日，孟德尔的理论于
1121865 年 2 月 8 日宜读，马尔萨斯早一些发表的《人口论》也
是在这同时期。这种时间的同时性并不是某种巧合，这是人
类对生命认识过程发展的必然，从这种角度看，这三个理论
确实是一本书，.只有把它们当成一本书来读，才能得到更
深刻的认识，这也是一种变换思想方式的阅读方法。·
假设我们把马尔萨斯、达尔文、孟德尔的理论当做一本
书来读，为什么孟德尔有生之年，甚至更久没有被公认，不
为当时的科学界所接受呢？科学界面对这样重大的历史性
发现，竟没有人懂得这种生物演化发展的内在规律的未来性
历史作用。历史对孟德尔实在是不公允的！和孟德尔相比，
达尔文是幸运的，他的《物种起源》发行的当天就被抢购一
空。伦敦出版商默端只得立刻着手再印。《物种起源》不仅
给达尔文而且给他的进化论带来了历史性的赞誉，对人类的
思想认识产生了深刻的影响。达尔文故去后，他的墓地能和
牛顿墓相邻，这正是人们对达尔文的崇敬和对达尔文科学贡
献的高度评价。而孟德尔晚于达尔文两年，于 1884 年去世，
直到孟德尔闭上眼睛，他也未能体会到获得成功给自己带来
的喜悦，椎一值得孟德尔欣慰的是他的论文被收入《布隆自
然科研究会会志》。10 年的时间，在全世界有 120 多个科学
学会和研究会，在交换会志中得到了孟德尔独特的科研成
果。当时连英国皇家学会的《科学论文目录》也提到了孟德
尔的名字，可他在世时却没有得到科学界的共鸣。但是，孟
113德尔是坚信自己的实验成果具有深远重大的历史作用的。孟
德尔也曾把自己的论文寄给了德国慕尼黑大学植物学教授
耐格里，但不知耐格里出何种心理，竟认为是“经验公式” ，
根本认识不到孟德尔理论潜在的重大作用。虽然被德国科学
家福克多引用、论述过孟德尔论文的科学观点，'可孟德尔
的价值，仍没有被当时的科学界发现，孟德尔晚年只能对自
己的朋友尼耶塞尔教授，发出坚定而深沉的最强音： “看吧！
我的时代来到了。”这是一个伟大科学真理的预言。不是么？
16 年后孟德尔的时代真的到来了。
孟德尔豌豆杂交实验萌生于 1843~1851 年之间，他的
实验正式开始在 1853 年，此时达尔文的《物种起源》还没
有成书问世，在此十多年的时间内，人工选择作为一种公开
的理论还没有形成，也不会作为传统知识来传播，可见孟德
尔是以自己语言表达了自己的观点，而且以自己的行动证实
自己的观点，用自己的实验（人工选择）发现孟德尔遗传定
律的。也就是他的实验和理论是独立于达尔文《物种起源》
之外，超前于自然选择与人工选择的优越论的。
另一方面孟德尔在实验研究方法上，创造了生物学研究
的创新机制，用数理数论的统计学思辨，来认识生物性状变
异数理规律的制约作用，产生的遗传现象的规律性。实际上
是麦比乌斯带的纯数学规律性，在生物学中存在的反映，是
大自然数理规律在数学和生物学的同一性的必然反映。也就
114是说，大自然数理规律是无处不在的，孟德尔的遗传理论正
是这种自然规律在生物圈的反馈，多么难得而准确的创新支
点呀！
其实孟德尔定律是十分简单的生命数论，也是最基本
的，通过人工选择杂交后，数量和性状的变化结果反映的，
儿代杂种数据统计产生的，生物遗传变异的数理规律。从细
小的量变中发现规律，这是孟德尔成功的秘钥。孟德尔在不
同性状的植物杂交中发现第一代杂种，只能表现出两个亲体
中的-一个亲体的性状特征，另一个亲体特征得不到显现，
当把这些杂种再进行第二代杂交时，两个亲体的性状就发生
分离，在不同的个体上都能是显现出来，其中显性性状（红
花豌豆）的个体数量的比永远是三比一，也就是说，分离是
由第二代杂交才产生的，这是杂种分离变异产生的二代杂种
个体数量比。如果把同时具有两对或两对以上不同性状的植
物杂交，它产生的第二代杂种是每个性状各自按三比一的比
数独立分离，而且互不干扰，这样个体变异比和性状变异比
是相同的比值，这就是三比一律的所在。
其实老子在《道德经》对三比一有过更深刻的论述，
这是两千年前中华民族智慧的结晶。他指出： “道生一，一
生二，二生三，三生万物。”万物(3)比 1（个体），一切都
由自然界仅有的这个最小的奇素数 3，与最小的奇数 1 的数
理比，衍生出来，老子揭示了生命、天地万物、大自然普遍
115遵循的数论机理。
这就是孟德尔不朽的贡献。孟德尔坚信自己的时代一定
会到来，没过多久，在 1900 年，几乎同时有三位生物学家
在自己的科学实践中，发现了和孟德尔相同的遗传规律。有
荷兰的德弗里斯，他在 1892 年以来用雪白麦瓶草进行杂交
实验，在二代杂交中得到了和孟德尔相同的三-一律结果。
接着德国的柯灵斯在 1900 年的豌豆、玉米二代杂交中，发
现了这一规律，他在福克的论文索引下，找到了沉睡 35 年
的孟德尔遗传定律时深感惊喜，并对孟德尔的实验给予极高
评价；同时孟德尔的同胞一奥地利生物学家丘歇马克也在
1899 年豌豆杂交中发现了三比一律…历史就是这样不尽如
人意，和孟德尔相比，这三位生物学家虽然都是在自己独立
的实验中，找到了生物遗传定律，可他们又同时发现，自己
的研究成果竟是 35 年前一位修道院院长的遗传定律的翻版，
他们只有以重新发现孟德尔的遗传定律的功绩，载入生物科
学的史册。孟德尔时代竞神奇般地同时在荷兰、奥地利、德
国到来，再加上英国生物学家贝特森的推波助澜，从整个西
欧开始，囊括美国，推动全世界人类进入基因时代。·
形成某一科学门类的科学研究成果，往往是在几个或许
多人，甚至几代人的共同努力下。从不同的侧面，在一个或
几个支点的基础上相互探索引证和延伸中得到最终完成的。
他们既是独立的一点，又是相互联系的一个系统工程。支点
116往往是他们相互连接的媒介。
第五章《给年创新的支点》理论科学历史回顾：
十、寻找孟德尔的密钥字母（按原版书顺序号
排列）
支点的讨论，带给我们许多新的的发现，使我们感到
了支点在科学创新方面产生的巨大威力，犹如开启一扇科
学大门的密钥，确实让我们赏心悦目，兴奋不已。我们从
一寸宽的纸带和一把小剪刀开始，在 1858 年德国莱比锡市
麦比乌斯曲面上留恋，到孟德尔遗传定律的故乡—一奥地
利布隆圣托马斯修道院的植物实验园地。我们徘徊在欧罗
巴日尔曼人的故地和法兰西的都市巴黎，参观伊萨克·牛
顿的故居，去达尔文晚年隐居的达温比村的庄园和因攻克
狂犬病而名留青史的巴斯德研究院…从阿基米德大数牧
牛题解到哥德巴赫猜想的数学皇冠上的珍珠；从只有一个
面的麦比鸟斯带到孟德尔遗传定律…8 世纪末叶的欧洲生物
科学发展特征是： “在这短短的半个世纪之中，在荷兰、法
国、奥地利、德国、意大利等国家的数学、生物学、地质学、
医学、植物学家几乎同时，在同一个焦点，向生命演化的数
理生物学进军，几乎同时揭开了引起人类共鸣的生物遗传学
的秘密。”当我们把上述这些科学家的理论编撰成册，当做
一书本阅读的时候，仿佛真有那么-一种神奇的幻觉，引领
我们深入生命的秘径，一点一点地接近着让人无法理解的谜
117团。彻底破译生命科学的密码在哪儿？完全解开大自然生命
之谜的秘钥在哪儿？麦比乌斯带引领我们走进了三比一的
幽径，三比一又将会把我们带向何方？一个一个支点，把大
自然一点一点地连接起来，形成一个我们把这表和本书第九
章所画孟德尔遗传因子方阵图相对比。它反映出和方阵隔行
相对变化的数理规律是同一的。J、K、L、M、N、O、P、Q
是数字符号加密的 8 种形式。形成 4 个模块（板）。由这 4
个模块在遗传密码总体（表）中所处方位的变换，可产生 16
组模块。16 组模块中的每一个小模块方阵，都存在纵横（上
下左右）对角间隔对等的性质。每个小模块又由 4 组密码方
阵组成。因为密码由 3 个碱基决定 1 个磷酸。这就构成了遗
传方阵 3：1 的数理基础。按遗传方阵（图 8）3：1 规律，
模块就产生隐性和显性的属性。它们的整体隔行（上下和左
右）对角相隔，就产生了整体模块隐性、显性的整体相间（隔
代）遗传性。也就是说，生命遗传存在以遗传密码为单位的
同时，也存在以遗传密码模块大、小方阵为单位的个体遗传
和整体模块遗传的两重性遗传。隐性密码和显性密码各自都
存在着自己“阵”系的连动效应。所以遗传密码受遗传方阵
的制约。
遗传有自己的内在的“阵”法，它构成了种性制约机制。
所以说计算机是种性制约机制的数理无边际组合变幻的人
工再现，是生物智能的数理运用和再现。
118我们还可以从其他侧面来看-一看这支点的发展轨迹，
也许更能够体会到每一学科的漫长而狠巨的发展历程。
1955 年夏天，在香山脚下的植物园里，有一小片淡红色的
荷花，引来了许多不平凡的游客，有许多植物学家，都用
惊叹的目光注视着每一朵莲花，这莲花从表面看没什么特
别之处，淡淡的粉红色花瓣，在莲托上亭亭玉立，·偌大的
荷叶像一面蒲扇贴在水面上，托着那粉红色莲花格外醒目，
历练的生命圈。形成一个环环相扣的生物演化秘链，.形成
一个永远也解不开的无边际的带环…孟德尔、德弗里斯、
柯灵斯、丘歌马克、贝特森找出了生命科学数理密码的数
比，可这种三比一的生物遗传规律，有自己性状变异的生
物时间钟，有自己固有的自然选择周期。它不能像巴斯德
发现微生物那样，把性状变异过程放在显微镜下观察，更
不能在生物杂交的性状变异完结之前，对实验植株进行离
士生化检验，在生物变异的自然选择漫长的固有周期内，
生物性状的组合在周期的哪一处时间窗进行，生物性状的
分离又在周期的哪一阶段产生，生物性状为什么会结合，
生物性状为什么要分离，这种分离与组合的深层次变化过
程和生物遗传因子的关系，遗传基因又是什么，它从哪里
来又到哪里去，它的变化受什么机制制约？这里面存在深
深隐藏着一系列秘密，·如果是像数字密码一样，可破译这
密码的密钥字母又该是什么？这密钥字母又如何组合？又
119该如何排列和按什么数论规律变化？所有这一切让许许多
多生物学家一时无法回答。可孟德尔留给科学史的另一把
密钥一“遗传因子是染色体的一部分”的天才预言，在人们
承认了孟德尔遗传定律后很久，仍然受到质疑。就连对孟德
尔理论最忠实的传播者，英国的生物学家贝特森在讲演中宣
告： “孟德尔的遗传理论，将在今后所有演化问题的讨论上
都将会起到重要的作用” ，从而把孟德尔推上生物遗传学奠
基人的宝座。然而，贝特森却始终怀疑孟德尔留给后人的这
一“密钥”。一直反对孟德尔的遗传因子是染色体的一部分
的伟大预言，使孟德尔交给人类的密钥，在贝特森的影响下
整整搁置了 46 年。46 年和漫长的人类演化世纪之途相比，
虽然仅仅是短短的一刹那，可对-一个人的生命时间跨度来
讲，就是半个生命。由于人的生命时限的这一特点，和植物
生长周期比较长的制约，使孟德尔只完成了生物遗传的数理
规律总结，而对自己灵感产生的密钥则无保留地留给了后
人，他以此寄希望人类用自己的密钥，破译整个生命演化科
学的密码，让孟德尔时代的辉煌早日到来。然而，找不到染
色体和遗传因子的关联所在，仅靠三比一律也将无法给生物
科学带来暖洋洋的春天。历史就又一次的把寻找创新支点的
重任交给了后继的攀登者。
早春的太阳照在蜿蜒曲折的大巴山脉，奇幻的云气升
腾缭绕遮盖了秦岭高高的顶蜂，只有山腰的苍翠远远地把
120神农架原始森林的浓艳绿色展现在我们眼前，让我们到古
木参天的冷杉坡，去感受一下尚未被垦殖的华中“绿色宝
库”神农架的风采，领略一下大自然固有的碧绿，体会一
下原始森林的真正自然选择。神农架有多少生命神奇？人
们出入仙境般美妙的冷暖洞；或漫步在那怪异罕见的潮汐
河岸坡，观看河水的一日三次潮涨潮落；到武家山去等待
晴空丽日，观看田地里发出的一道强烈刺眼的白光：还是
到石头屋村和猫儿观村之间的深水潭，寻觅难得一见的怪
兽…我们来到了白色动物之乡，那里茂密的华山松，粗
壮的栎木林和脚下攀爬的紫藤，在初春清淡的绿色中只露
出崎岖的山岩小路，远远地看去像一条系在云雾中的锦带。
只见眼前依山生长着重重叠叠的松树，像一抹深厚的绿色
屏障，眼前这片松林，近处的松枝针叶散发着松脂的清香。
让我们在这香脂中感受到这儿散发着无限的生机。你是否
想到在这片丛翠之中却生存着全身雪白的白松鼠、白乌鸦、
白蜘蛛…蓝天、绿树、绿地怎么就自然选择出白色的松
鼠、白色的蜘蛛！这里没有孟德尔的人工选择。一切都在
大自然的自律中进行，可这些小动物，为什么在神农架，
就变得如此圣洁起来，换了一身的白羽毛，就连乌鸦也讨
人喜欢起来，更不用说白金丝猴。·
“黑乌鸦怎么变成白乌鸦，这里没有人工选择的杂交，
只有自然选择，那么这里面白的变异，又如何用三比一数
121理来解释呢？如果我们带进来一只黑乌鸦那将如何呢？”
“带进来，它也要灭绝。”
“为什么？”
“种性制约机制。”
“等不到种性制约，白乌鸦群就会把黑乌鸦活活吃掉。
这是领地占有的生存斗争，物竞天择。这是马尔萨斯的理
论。”
这些动物的渊源在哪？是山、是水、还是林带、土的
灵气、云的缭绕…是什么造就了这白色动物之谜。繁殖、
选择、变异、遗传，所有的理念都按着同一的白色趋同，
不同的种和种性相同的个体，都按同一性状变异，用现有
的理论真是无法理解！只有大自然有这种神奇的选择功力，
这是达尔文的自然选择的优越。白色动物在世界其他国家
地区也有分布，像北极熊。但北极熊是同一种的个体群居，
并不是多种同一性状（白色种群)在同一地区栖息。还有
印度的白虎、非洲白狮子，都是白色的动物的典型。这些
都是同种的个体群居，地域生物圈存在的模式，是可用自
然选择和遗传变异理论解释的。可神农架不仅仅有白松鼠、
白蜘蛛、白鸟鸦，还有白蛇、白兔、白熊、白狼、白鹿、
白麝、白金丝猴…
这么许多的白色动物的种群，栖息在相同生存环境的
同一地域，共生同一性状，代代相传，运用种性制约机制
122又如何解释呢？这可以把生物的某一性状（白色），上升到
种性（食、色）的高度，强化遗传，就能很好解释某种性
状在不同种群的区域相同性的代代相传。·
“可这是种与种的同一性状趋同性，不是同种的个体
性状的同一选择。”
“这可以用不同种种性共有性状制约机制去认识，这
是种性共有性状制约机制，在栖息群落的自然选择，并不
等于不存在其他性状变异的杂种，这仍符合孟德尔三比一
定律，·只是某一性状（白色）具有免变异性。这种免变异
性的存在，就是把这种性状，上升到种性高度，强化遗传
达到种性制约。”
“也是，这么说不管生物的某一性状，都可以是有免
变异性，进入种性制约机制？”
“我想应该是这样的，这就是神农架白色动物秘密的
启示。”
假如我们引进一只黑乌鸦，或棕色松鼠、黑蜘蛛，或
者其他某一种非白色的动物个体。比如说黑鸟鸦吧，白乌
鸦群会如何策对，我们可以作如下的讨论。
如果黑乌鸦是强者，能
够适应神农架的这种生存环境，存活下来，并能和白乌
鸦交配繁殖。按孟德尔遗传法则第一代杂种，黑乌鸦只
能被淹没：只有第二代杂种，黑乌鸦按三一比遗传产生杂
123图 8 遗传方阵图
种，第二代杂种就会有三只
白乌鸦一只黑乌鸦。按这种
规律杂交，自然选择若干代，白乌鸦和黑乌鸦从第三代开
始，就按 3×4” ：1×4(3：1 乘以 4”)的级数发展，如第
二代 3：1、12：4、48：16、192：48、786：192…如
果把这种规律画成方阵示意图，就能明显看出隔代遗传的
普遍规律。横竖均体现出隔代遗传，黑乌鸦的杂种排列，横
竖均有一排白乌鸦相隔（如图 8）。从图中可以看出，杂种
是自然选择过程中所必须的，往往杂种是种性优越性状的
活力基因。所以杂种本身是一种优胜劣汰机制在繁殖交配
过程中的体现。凡是能够存在的杂种，都是在生存斗争的淘
汰过程中的胜者。杂种产生的一种变异，只是这种存在的
标识，是一种性状用进废退的标识。所以无论是人工选择
还是自然选择，自然产生的杂种（而不是某种外因产生的
突变)，都是在种性制约机制下选择的结果，都是经过漫长
的劣汰之后的优胜者而存在。杂种往往是种性优良的反映，
生物演化的链条，杂种往往会形成演化链中最强有力的一
环。
从上面的公式我们就能看出：
方阵中的一个小方阵 88 是按 3：1 数理规律产生黑乌
鸦（杂种）的。这种小方阵我们用口表示。口 X4 就是四个
124小方阵，它的白黑乌鸦的比就是 12：4。口 X4 白黑乌鸦的
比就是 48：16。以此类推为 192：48、786：192…它们
分别为 4 方阵、16 方阵等等…从这种几何遗传增殖变化，
还可以看到每一级数向高一级的级数变化过程中，白乌鸦
(级数)都构成下一遗传方阵黑乌鸦（杂种）的基数。例
48:16,48 是下一代（方阵)192：48 的基数，同理 192
(白)构成 786：192（黑）的基数。以此类推，这种规律
就体现出杂种在演化过程中基底性极强的遗传繁殖作用。
这是一个支点。它可以解释东亚飞蝗在某一地域，猝然在
极短的时间内繁殖到每平方米成千上万的灾害性突变，就
是这方阵遗传的级数的变化。这是马尔萨斯人口论所强调
的人口按几何级数增长的实证。所以，如果我们带进一只
黑乌鸦，一旦能在自然选择中存在下来，就能成为白乌鸦
种群的佼佼者，即使黑乌鸦羽毛（白色性状）不能得到遗
传，在下代杂种中显现，但其他性状有利于种性演化的性
状，也会在杂种的后代中隐性存在，成为种性演化的优势，
起到种性演化优胜的隐性作用，会在未来的某代杂种中突
然显现，这种变异是漫长的、潜伏的，是种性制约的结果。·
这就是说黑鸟鸦会成为白乌鸦种性演化的积极因子，这是所
有杂种共有的属性。
生命演化是在生存斗争中进行自然选择完成的，包括
人工选择过程的性状变异和遗传来实现的，演化的优劣集
125中体现在繁殖产生的后代杂种的品相，看它们继承了多少
种性的优点又淘汰了多少种性的缺点。种性制约规律，保
证了种性最本质的种性优势和在杂种的衍生过程的不可变
异性。又能演化某一种的性状，上升到种性高度，强化遗
传产生免变异性，从而保证遗传过程不发生任何种的错位，
不会使白鸟鸦和黑乌鸦的杂交，产生乌鸦以外的种性变种，
在保证种性的纯洁性的同时，发展种性某种性状优势，繁
殖产生符合生存斗争自然选择的种的个体。可见生命演化
是一个连续的，相互制约的，整个有机的整体过程。
那么这种推断是否能进行一下实地实验得到证实呢？
答案是很难。为什么？因为带进一只黑乌鸦到神农架
自然保护区。还要在这里安营扎寨，长年观察下去，再说
白乌鸦栖息在高高的树顶枝杈上的窝里，我们放进的黑乌
鸦，栖息在这原始森林的何方，它们能否繁殖？我们无法
监视。再加上四季变化…也就是说，我们根本无法找到
它的踪影，无法跟踪观察，只有任其自然选择。
这也是孟德尔为什么用豌豆进行杂交实验的原因，用
植物进行杂交有它的的优势。可也有缺点，植物的生长周
期太长，离开土壤立刻就会死亡。那谁是最合适的实验用
品种呢？是果蝇。
蚊蝇的生长周期很短。这在 2000 多年前亚里士多德
的《动物学》就有过描述，果蝇的繁殖力相当强。这就克
126服了孟德尔使用豌豆生长期长的困难。而且，.果蝇生长无
需固定的土壤，只用牛奶瓶就可以，而且还可以用显微镜
来观察。
为什么不用果蝇杂交来寻找孟德尔的密钥字母。
我们不是在寻找科学创新的支点吗？酸啤酒成为巴斯
德发现微生物的支点，果蝇这让人人讨厌的小虫，却构成
了美国的生物学家摩尔根获得诺贝尔奖的支点。这是克服
孟德尔豌豆杂交生长周期长和无法离士观察的一种正确地
选择。果蝇容易繁殖，生长迅速，这会大大缩短杂交和性
状变异的周期，便于观察省时、省力…
自 1910 年摩尔根发现了实验果蝇杂种中，产生一只白
眼果蝇的那一天开始，摩尔根才从反孟德尔遗传学的立场
彻底改变过来，他继续用白眼果蝇进行一代杂交，生出的
全是红眼果蝇，再用第一代的杂交果蝇相互交配时，在二
代果蝇中，才出现了白眼果蝇，这和孟德尔的豌豆杂交实
验完全有共同的规律。所以摩尔根才引导他的学生组成实
验研究小组，向孟德尔提示的深层次细胞的染色体和孟德
尔的遗传因子的组合深入研究下去，并且很快取得了重要
成果。
也就是说染色体是遗传因子的载体，染色体和遗传因
子都是实实在在的物质实体。摩尔根集中了小组的优势，
反复试验观察，发现一根染色体上可以传递承载许多因子，
127128
摩尔根测得果蝇身上有四条染色体，形成四个连锁群带，
生命的多种性状是和众多不同的因子相匹配的。由于有限
的生物细胞染色体，可以载负众多因子。所以能使生命众
多的不同性状得到遗传，这就把孟德尔的遗传因子和染色
体关联的密钥字母在果蝇身上得到破译，创立了摩尔根的
《孟德尔遗传机理》。
我们不妨以儿代生物学、物理学、化学家的理论进行
推导，用一个一个理论的支点，径直地走进生物遗传的深
层领域，去寻找生命遗传的密钥字母，去找寻那神秘的
DNA。
第六章
《给你创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回
顾：
十一、富兰克林在三阶梯前驻足（按原版书章序序号）
摩尔根出生在美国南部富饶的肯塔基州的名门旺族摩
尔根家族。摩尔根全名叫托马斯·亨特·摩尔根，1866 年
出生在肯塔基州的列克星顿。在林肯总统指挥南北美战争
中，他的叔叔是反林肯最坚决的南军名将，统率千军，号
称“南军雷神”。虽然业绩显赫，终因与历史车轮向背而败
北。统一后，摩尔根家族仍家境殷实。摩尔根童年过着庄
园主的富家子弟的生活，喜欢收集植物、奇石花草和捕猎
动物。中学毕业后，就读于肯塔基州立学院，大学毕业后
考入霍普金斯大学，是一个出色的生物学研究生。在大名鼎鼎的生物遗传学家布鲁斯克教授指导下，涉足生物遗传
学的研究课题，这期间，尚无明显的科学建树。1904 年进
入哥伦比亚大学任生物学教授。1908 年开始走出了孟德尔
植物杂交的圈子，在亚里士多德描述的小果蝇启示下，开
始用果蝇进行胚胎学实验，直到 1910 年摩尔根仍然是坚决
的反对孟德尔遗传定律的学者。在此期间，他得益于他的
师兄弟生物学家贝特森对孟德尔遗传学理论进行了全面深
入和细致的研究，为捕捉小小的白眼果蝇突变的偶然性支
点的机会，打下了坚实的理论基础和接受孟德尔遗传机理
的思想准备。1910 年 3 月的一天，摩尔根发现小白眼果蝇
的突变，从而使摩尔根在遗传理论上取得了重大突破。
1915 年和斯塔特文特、布理奇斯共同署名发表了划时
代的摩尔根学派的理论巨著《孟德尔遗传机理》，其后相继
发表了《遗传的物质基础》和《基因论》，发现总结了连锁
和互换定律即遗传学第三定律。1933 年为表彰摩尔根在遗
传学上的重大贡献向他颁发了诺贝尔奖。1945 年他走完了
辉煌的一生。摩尔根之所以取得成功有诸多的外在条件和
内在的因素。第一，有名师和鲁克斯的指导。第二，得益
于师兄贝特森对孟德尔遗传理论的倍加推崇。第三，及时
捕捉到了科学创新的最重要支点—一一个小小的白眼果蝇
的突变。这种难得的偶然性，使他敲开了一扇新的科学大
门。第四，摩尔根得益于课题组全体的群策群力。摩尔根
129只完成了孟德尔对染色体与遗传内子天才预言这一部分，
却忽略了三比一支点的延伸，这是摩尔根 1910 年前反对孟
德尔理论思想深处仍存在局限性的必然反馈。
因此可见支点在科学创新的过程中，所起到的决定性
的重要作用。支点一方面可以带来爆发性的重大突破。同
时支点也存在后支点的延伸，就是二次突破，即支点的延
伸。深层次的挖掘必然引发支点在纵深的某一支点上的二
次突破。
支点的二次突破正表现出学科和学科之间的相互关系
和相互的关联性。
前面我们已讨论过支点的发现存在一定的偶然性，所
以，可从以下几点对支点的作用作一概括：①支点是隐秘
的。②支点往往具有空前巨大的突破性作用。③支点现象
往往是事物本质现象的瞬间棵露。因此，支点现象反映了
事物的本质规律。④支点现象存再即时的、本质的、随机
的、有瞬息万变的性质。⑤从找到支点到认识支点，所反
映的本质规律的过程即是突发的又是相继延伸的，存在深
层次的二次突破。以巴斯德曾讲过的丹麦物理学家奥斯特
为例，可以看出支点都存在以上的基本特点。在 1820 年，
奥斯特偶然发现一根接通电流的导线能够使磁针旋转，再
此支点上莫尔斯发明了电报，可电报并没有揭示这个支点
现象反映出的本质规律。如果奥斯特顺着这个支点规律延
130伸下去，就能发现更深层次的支点规律，实现电报以外的
二次突破。这就是牛顿说的站在巨人的肩膀上，构成能撬
动整个地球的支点的深层次含意。于是奥斯特支点二次突
破的历史使命，便落在了英国一个铁匠的儿子法拉第的肩
上。法拉第站在奥斯特的肩上，接过了一根带电导线使磁
针旋转的支点，重复奥斯特的实验。在 1821 年 8 月 30 日
这天，他发现小磁针在载流导线的周围，有环绕导线作圆
周运动的现象。法拉第立刻抓住这个支点现象不放，10 年
间不间断地试验、思索，至 1831 年他改变了奥斯特使用直
形导线的方法，把两根导线绕在一个环形磁铁上，一根导
线连接电源，另一根导线旁边放上一个小磁针（奥斯特的
小磁针是偶然的巧合，法拉第的小磁针是支点的思维变换
产物)，于是当导线开关闭合的一瞬间，导线旁边的小磁针
产生了奥斯特效应。反之当导线开关打开的一瞬间，导线
旁的小磁针同样偏转，于是电磁感应的奥斯特机理在法拉
第手里实现了二次突破，产生了法拉第的动电生磁，动磁
生电。奥斯特支点在法拉第手里继续延伸，发现了导体切
割磁力线产生感应电流的机理。顺着感应电流继续延伸发
展奥斯特支点，使法拉第的电磁理论上升到法拉第磁力线
和法拉第场的新高度。于是法拉第的场理论又形成了·一个
强有力的支点，同样期待着后来者再次实现法拉第“场”
支点的突破。
131支点确实有一条隐秘的、看不见的甬道。如果把奥斯
特支点和法拉第支点连接起来，甬道就自然通向麦克斯韦
的再次突破。麦克斯韦在法拉第磁力线和场在欧洲科学界
无人承认的死寂中，看到了当时认为法拉第磁力线、场概
念模糊不清的虚场性的真谛，用简单的数学方程式，精确
地论述了电流周围空间确实存在磁力线，并把法拉第磁力
线场延伸扩散，实现麦克斯韦运动的电场产生磁场，运动
的磁场产生电场的高层次突破，从而引发了物理学的大变
革。即麦克斯韦的交变电磁场论。
麦克斯韦在他的《物理学的力线》.中的论述，改变了
人们从奥斯特开始的单项认识，确立了导体中的传导电流
能激起磁场运动的单向性引入双向性的电磁交变认识。他
说： “交变的电场会产生交变的磁场，而交变的磁场又会激
起交变的电场。因此，只要在空间某处存在着一个交变电
场，则这个交变电场就会在其周围的空间产生新的交变磁
场。而反复不断的电场生磁场，磁场生电场，变化的电磁
场就在空间中以波的形式由近及远地传播开来。”自此电磁
波的波与粒子学说的大辩论，便引发了整个物理学的大变
革，使麦克斯韦的支点突破不断向纵深延伸……
麦克斯韦建立了自己的定量的电磁理论，把法拉第的
动电生磁，动磁生电，上升到变动的电场产生磁场，变动
的磁场产生电场。由此交变电磁场产生电磁波，进而麦克
132斯韦从计算中发现，电学中的静电单位与电磁单位的比值
永远是 310740/秒，它和菲索测定的光速 314558 千米/秒
的数字极其相近，这个数字成了新的支点，同时产生了一
个新突破的拐点，因为麦克斯韦深深地感觉到，这个数字应
该是电磁波的传播速度。于是 1864 年他科学地大胆预言：
“光也是电磁波” ，使理论上升到光、电、磁的统一，得到
数学上的统一认证。
麦克斯韦的新支点，还会引发新的更巨大的突破吗？
是的，我们从一篇论文的开篇语中即可看到这点： “大
家知道，麦克斯韦电动力学一像现在通常为人们所理解
的那样一应用到运动的物体上时，就要引起一些不对称，
而这种不对称似乎不是现象所固有的。比如设想一个磁体
同一个导体之间的电动力的相互作用。在这里，可观察到
的现象只同导体和磁体的相对运动有关，可是按照通常的
看法，这两个物体之中，究竟是这个在运动，还是那个在
运动，都是截然不同的两回事…”这就是爱因斯坦发表
在 1905 年德国《物理学杂志》上的划时代首篇巨著相对论
《论动体的电动力学》的开篇语，爱因斯坦的相对论就是
选择了麦克斯韦支点延伸的拐点，作为自己的支点。爱因
斯坦从麦克斯韦支点突破后，自此一发不可收，创立了从
狭义相对论到广义相对论的经典理论。
因此支点还存在变换的性质。从麦克斯韦支点到爱因
133斯坦支点，存在一个门类的变换。这就是我们要总结的支
点的第六个特点。它反映了科学门类之间存在着某种内部
的必然联系。所以把握支点的拐点，是寻找实现科学门类
之间创新突破的关键，这就是支点的变换。相对论就是实
现支点变换最成功、业绩最辉煌的典范。
看来支点变换的把握是很重要的学问。它需要那些有
准备的人，必须具有更深更广的知识面，否则支点的拐点
就很难发现。
上面所叙述的支点，仅仅是在物理学上支点运用的成
功表现，对于生物学上支点的延伸和支点变换，.也同样起
到科学创新的不朽的作用。因为科学研究的各种现象都是
大自然的自然现象，自然现象都是相通的。前面几部分谈
到的麦比乌斯分子支点和生物学演变就是很好的说明。以
下我们只想对支点的变换问题作以探讨。
孟德尔在豌豆杂交的支点上，建立了孟德尔遗传理论，
发现了三比一律，同时孟德尔也像麦克斯韦预言光也是电
磁波一样，深刻地预言染色体是遗传因子实体的载体。原
本是反孟德尔遗传理论的摩尔根，也从突变的小白眼果蝇
创新支点上，彻底改变了对孟德尔遗传理论的反对派观点，
但摩尔根没有在三比一的支点上向前发展延伸，而是在这
一支点上找到了支点的拐点，从果蝇的四条染色体上，找
到了遗传因子群落的栖息实体，创建了摩尔根的《基因论》，
134成功地完成了支点的变换，发现了遗传学第三定律。并获
得了择取生物遗传学诺贝尔奖桂冠的第一人。所以说，支
点的变换往往是拐向更辉煌的支点。
但是，支点转向拐点的难度是很大的，前面我们说过
它需要更深的思辨和更广的知识面，也需要有更专业化的
多学科、高素质凝聚的科学修养，有了这些准备，就会有
更多的成功变换支点的机遇。
此外还有机遇的概率，假如摩尔根在那一天没有在实
验室，就不能发现那只小小的白眼果蝇，摩尔根就失去了
捕捉白眼果蝇的机遇，也就不可能有这一支点的变换。或
者说小白眼果蝇，在 1910 年的这一天没有出现在摩尔根小
组的实验视界里或者出现了摩尔根把这个突变的小白眼果
蝇忽视而漏掉，像当年慕尼黑大学植物学教授耐格尔收到
孟德尔论文时一样，由于某种原因没有引起他的重视，而
漏掉了一个创新的支点。这里面也存在机遇、运气的因素，
这是我们尤其应该避免的，因为这里的毫厘之差，就有可
能带来失去创新的机遇，造成终生遗憾。
科学史上就有不少这样的例证。比如前面提到的胡克，
他发现了著名的胡克定律，但在支点变换上，数学的功底
稍欠一些， ‘虽然先于牛顿发现了平方反比规律，但也没有
得到万有引力定律的完整论证，失去了经典力学奠基者的
桂冠。在生物遗传学上最令人惋惜的是英国的女科学家富
135兰克林。她从小在保罗女子学校接受过一流的教育，又是
剑桥大学的高材生，多才多艺，美貌靓丽，是当时欧洲很
有名气的青年女物理学家。她利用 X 射线衍射技术从结晶
学视角，对核酸的结构进行了深入细致的研究。由于富兰
克林在结晶学上有很深的造诣，加上她灵巧的双手，勤奋
工作和高智能的判断力，使她已经洞察到了核酸的全部秘
密。
在科学巨人的队伍中，我们还是第一次提到年轻的女
科学家的名字。富兰克林将核酸生物大分子结构的多股链
双螺旋形象从晶体图像上推测了出来，而且还拍出了一张
很精美的 DNA 照片。她以一个女性的敏感，猜到核酸结构
内部的可变部分的碱基与有关规则重复部分的碱基的。一
对应机制…双螺旋的发现者之一克里克也承认，富兰克
林已经非常接近这一点了，可惜，富兰克林到此就驻足不
前了。
什么原因呢？主要是没有把握住支点、拐点到来的机
遇，她已经有了一张很精美的衍射图，只要从大分子晶体
学拐向遗传学，把自己的猜测大胆地画出来就是一个完整
的 DNA 生物结构模型，就会大功告成。可是富兰克林为什
么在三阶梯前驻足了呢？是女性的感情弱点，还是女性善
变的情思？不是，都不是。居里夫人没有因为丈夫的猝世
而驻足，最终获得了诺贝尔奖的桂冠。居里夫人的成功说
136137
明女性感情的弱点反倒是执著追求的宝贵素质。女性的善
变，对科学思维的变换无疑是天赋的优势。可能是对孟德
尔遗传理论的困惑，再就是她没有认识到用 X 射线得到的
大分子晶体结构揭示 DNA 的奥秘。
也许是富兰克林的运气不很好，这样一位美女子，30
岁在科学上就有了成功的建树，却英年早逝，37 岁就被癌
症夺去了生命，实在是让人惋惜。在富兰克林去世 4 年后
的 1962 年，这一项目就获得了诺贝尔奖，如果她能活着，
就会和威尔金斯、沃森、克里克一同站在领奖台上共获殊
荣。真可惜这位女科学家没能坚持到这一天的到来，而与
诺贝尔奖失之交臂，荣誉和花环都没能出现在她的墓志铭
上。
也有人说这是她性格所致。
图 9
据说她和威尔金斯性格合不来，
导致了后来威尔金斯和富兰克林
的分手，所以失去了发现 DNA 双
螺旋秘密的机缘。威尔金斯小组
失去了富兰克林，就失去了 DNA
双螺旋发现的机会，也就失去了
夺冠成功的机会。如果威尔金斯
和富兰克林能配合始终，幸运之
神就有可能不会降临到沃森、克138
里克的头上。
沃森和克里克的 DNA 模型一开始就在三螺旋里转圈
圈，只到沃森看到富兰克林的结晶体衍射图之后，才取得
突破。沃森在看到衍射图后仅仅两个星期，就和克里克拿
出了改制的 DNA 双螺旋模型，并在 1953 年 4 月 25 日英国
科学杂志《自然》上发表，并配以千字的短文和威尔金斯
和富兰克林认证的文章，使科学界为之一震。可见富兰克
林衍射图的功劳是决定性的，是沃森和克里克的强有力的
根基。
也许是病魔使富兰克林在 DNA 双螺旋的门槛前驻足，
也许这些因素都有。总之，从支点到拐点再形成支点的变
幻，还需要不可缺少的灵感、胆识与想像力，以及对事业
成功的无坚不摧的信心。这是发现支点之后，必须具备的
要素。同时也需要正确对待不被认可、理解的情况和难熬
的沉默。甚至像孟德尔一样终身不为人所理解。信心对科
%学家来说是成功的保证。年轻学子必须树立科学创新的信
心，让这宝贵的自信，从我们寻找到科学创新支点的那一
瞬开始，凝心历练，创造出科学的辉煌！
第七章
《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回
顾
十二、相交在神秘的 DNA（按原版书章顺序号）
美国旧金山湾，不仅仅是华人集中侨居的美丽港湾，也有着世界公认的“基因谷”的美誉，这里以旧金山斯坦
福大学为中心，对生物工程科学进行研究。同当时的硅谷
一样，已经成为世界瞩目的生物工程研究前沿，生物工程
研究的摇篮。自从孟德尔遗传理论被重新发现之后。遗传
学竟和欧洲移民一起，从西欧泊到了北美洲的美利坚。摩
尔根接过了孟德尔的理论，使美国在短短的数十年中在基
因理论和遗传机理上有了重大的突破。后来者居上，领先
于世界生物工程领域。
美国为什么能在短短的建国 200 年里，在科学和诸方
面的发展上，能后来居上，领先于世界呢？
这有很多因素，是近代史自然选择的结果。历史是人
类对自己的生存斗争，物竞天择的最简单记述，是对人类
自然选择的记述。美国是人类国家近代最成功的移民国家
典范。
大家都知道，美国是个移民的国家。每个州和每座城
市都是由世界各大洲的移民重新垦殖开发，其人口百分之
九十九是泊来的。这就形成了世界各民族的大融合，科学、
人才、物质的大融合，便造就了美利坚科学的神话。
随着 DNA 奥秘的不断揭示，人类已经从远亲婚配的优
生遗传的自然选择，开始向人类个体基因工程的设想实践
突破。克隆技术被推向了生物工程的最前列。其实，克隆
并不是奇迹，它和光谱一样，是自然存在的。在生命演化
139的过程中就存在着克隆现象。对我们 21 世纪的人类来说，
只是对这种生命现象的发现和重新认识。这和运用多普勒
效应光谱彩虹原理，·制造摄谱仪，·再运用红移来研究宇
宙星体运动变化的道理是同样的。这并没能改变宇宙的法
则。克隆多利，只是一种生物演化道路上，普遍隐秘存在的
生命全息复制，再造同种个体生命的现象。
这暴露了体细胞在特定的条件下，存在全息遗传性能。
在人类诞生之始，就存在三胞胎、多胞胎的无性繁殖一样，
是细胞生命的特异功能。因为克隆多莉，本身并没有从体
细胞克隆出羊以外种的个体生命。克隆、变异仍是在种性
制约机制规定的严格限制下，顺理成章地自然繁衍。：克隆
不可能创造出一个新的超自然的生物。即使产生一个人类
怪异的变种，也会被自然选择无情的海汰。因为自然不会
像维尔穆特用 434 比 1 的高昂代价，来维护个反自然的
变种存在，而不受大自然的淘汰而灭绝。
孟德尔天才地预言： “遗传是由遗传因子决定的”。染
色体是遗传因子的载体。构筑了现代遗传学大的经典框架，
摩尔根接过了孟德尔遗传机理，发现了遗传的连锁和交换
法则。摩尔根认为：个体种的种性状态起源于生殖质内联
在一起形成若干连锁群的成对的元件，相应的连锁群内的
成员之间，有时也发生有秩序的交换。这里摩尔根用原件
和成员描述了孟德尔遗传因子。这种看不见的因子，开创
140了形式遗传学的先河。“基因”一词是 1899 年丹麦遗传学
家约翰逊首先使用的，他认为，基因这个小字眼容易和别
的词结合。易读易用。并不是由某种实验效应印证的产物。
仍然是形式的，朦胧的假设。至今，我们仍无法看到基因。
1909 年约翰逊又用“合子”来表示孟德尔的“遗传因子”。
只有在 1951 年摩尔根小组发表了《孟德尔遗传机理》一书
后，才全面系统地提出了基因论。它的主要论点并没有超
出形式遗传学的领域。其要点是： “基因在染色体上，一个
染色体含有各种基因。”基因在染色体上有一定位置，一定
顺序，呈直线排列。同源染色体上的等位基因之间常发生
有秩序的交换。基因在形成配子时符合孟德尔一、二遗传
定律分离与自由组合，和第三遗传定律连锁与交换。到此，
基因还是看不见，摸不到，混沌的万能遗传物质。它存在
却无法捕捉，它存在却无法看到，只能感知。
在这之前，萨顿和波伏里都曾提出过染色体是孟德尔
遗传定律的基础和在一条染色体上，有许多不同的基因的
假说。这种观点也己经包含在摩尔根基因论之中了。1921
年缪勒提出基因是一种微小的粒子。他要研磨基因，他要
烧灼基因。然而他没有像居里夫人那样经过几年坚忍不拔
的试验，从烧炼沥青中结晶出镭，让人们真正看到基因的
结构模型。
有些人认为基因是看不见的。正因为这样，才是许多
141物理学家、生化学家、细胞学家、数学家纷纷加盟寻找基
因的行列，对生命的遗传进行深入的、微观的认真研究。
以著名物理学家薛定谔的《生命是什么》为代表，开始了
细胞遗传学、分子遗传学、胚胎遗传学和数论遗传、X 射
线等多视角，齐头并进地合围抢滩式的研究阵营。
据说富兰克林，摩尔根原来都不是研究遗传学的。都
不是孟德尔的信徒。富兰克林原本是运用 X 射线研究大分
子结晶体的。当她加入威尔金斯小组之后，才开始运用 X
射线对 DNA 结构进行研究并取得突破。摩尔根原来是研究
生物胚胎学的，他奶瓶里用香蕉汁喂养着成千上万的果蝇。
原本与孟德尔遗传理论无关。摩尔根只想寻找果蝇的自然
突变与胚胎学的关联。他还著文论证染色体不可能携带孟
德尔的遗传因子。是孟德尔遗传理论的反对者。直到白眼
果蝇的出现，才使摩尔根的观点产生了 180 度的大回转。
白眼果蝇使摩尔根走向辉煌的支点。DNAX 射线结晶衍射
图，也给富兰克林带来了同样的支点。可富兰克林没有狠
狠抓住这个创新支点。可见，支点的作用比莎士比亚描述
的金线的魔力还要巨大无比，真可谓科学创新的灵魂。
通过-一系列的事例，我们也逐渐深入地提高了对支点
在科学创新中起决定性突破作用的认识。当我们带着小剪
刀中分麦比乌斯纸带的时候，并没有这样入木三分的认识。
就像我们当年读中学的时候，第一次听到给我一个支点，
142我会撬动整个地球时带来的内心震撼一样。仅仅是热血沸
腾的激动，并没有认识到科学家对支点本质论述的真谛。
那时我们仅仅是表面的一般认识，只有深入，再深入才能
接近支点的本质。感受到它惊天地泣鬼神的奇幻魔力。不
是么？同样是这张 DNAX 射线结晶衍射图，沃森看过深受
启发，仅用了两个星期的时问，就完成了 DNA 模型的改进，
实现了重大突破，从而获得了 1962 年诺贝尔奖。可用自己
的智慧和技巧，辛辛苦苦拍摄到这张珍贵底片的富兰克林，
却郁郁寡欢。8 年后被癌症夺去了她年轻美丽的生命。虽
然她创造了科学奇迹，捕捉、发现和得到了 DNA 双螺旋的
衍射图，发现 DNA 双螺旋模型的桂冠本应属于她，可是她
却与诺贝尔奖无缘，与沃森和富兰克林的命运形成鲜明对
比，难道不让我们感受到捕获和利用支点与拐点的关键所
在吗？
摩尔根从反孟德尔遗传理论的立场，在经过白眼果蝇
的杂交实验证后，毫不犹豫地背叛了自己到孟德尔的大旗
下建功立业。这说明事情往往就因为没有坚持下去，就与
成功和辉煌远离，抓住支点不放才是成功的关键。假如，
富兰克林能在威尔金斯小组坚持下去，那千载难逢的幸运
也许就会落在她的头上，她将会是居里夫人之后，又位
获得诺贝尔奖的女科学家。这是多么令人不可思议？成功
与失败仅差这么一步，荣誉与遗憾就差这么一刹那的闪念
143时机。假如，沃森看不到富兰克林的 DNAX 射线结晶衍射图，
他和克里克还会在三螺旋的老圈子里不知要转多久。也许
会终生走不出三螺旋的圈子，而与诺贝尔奖的桂冠无缘。
在科学史上，成功者被埋没和成功者默默无闻的例证
太多了！并不是只有女性的富兰克林。富兰克林是最先捕
捉到 DNAX 射线结晶衍射图的，那么第一个发现 DNA 的科
学家是谁呢？是米歇尔，他发现的是核素。70 年后，人们
才认识到核素就是由两种不同的核酸：DNA、RNA 组成的遗
传物质。
在 20 世纪初，人们否定了核酸分子的遗传作用，认为
核酸只是一种简单排列的四核苷酸。然而，米歇尔像孟德
尔一样发出过天才的预言，信誓旦旦地说： “如果我们假定
有一种单一物质，能作为一种酵素或化学激活剂而作用，
并且是受精作用的重要因素。那么，毫无疑问，我们会想
到核素！”这再清楚也不过地说明核素是遗传物质。可人们
却忘记了他的预言。就因为这忘却，我们也应该把米歇尔
的研究记述下来。因为核素是一个支点，是个具有科学创
新的支点。米歌尔是发现 DNA 的第-一人，是 DNA 生命遗传
理论的奠基人。
米歇尔全名弗里德里奇米歇尔，是瑞士科学家。1844
年生，他在 25 岁时首先发现了核素。那时他很年轻，刚刚
获得博士学位，精力旺盛。他对莱茵河蛙鱼精子进行长期
144研究。他是个化学家，也是运用化学探索遗传秘密，对生
物大分子研究贡献巨大的开拓者。由于蛙鱼精子头部全是
细胞核，十分便于研究观察，为他研究生物大分子，蛋白
质提供了方便。米歇尔发现了一种新物质：鱼精蛋白。为
了进一步研究，米歇尔到附近医院收集外科废弃的纱布绷
带，用胃蛋白酶水解取得到浓细胞。她偶然发现了一种不
溶解的新物质，一种蛋白酶无法分解的细胞核物质，在酶
的作用下，仍保持完整，仅仅是变得小了一些。米歌尔对
这种新物质进行化学分析，便给它起了个“核素”的名字。
因为核素是酸性的，所以人们后来就把核素称为核酸，沿
用至今。
不过，真正认识核酸，还是在第二次世界大战结束以
后。因为战争使各国科学家很难安于自己的研究课题，所
以战前对 DNA 研究的进展十分缓慢。比较有影响的是化学
家科塞尔，他搞清了 DNA 的四种成分。其最小结构是脱氧
核糖核酸。每种核苷酸又由更小的磷酸、脱氧核糖、碱基
三部分构成。这四种核苷酸又有四种不同的碱基：腺嘌呤
(A)、鸟嘌呤(G)、胸腺嘧腚(T)、胞嘧腚(C)组成。接
下来莱文提出四核苷酸假说：认为四核酸含量是相同的，
谁也没有优势，它们的地位是绝对一致的。
那么对于无时无处都在千变万化的生命来说，这种一
致性在大自然中可能存在吗？奥地利化学家查伽夫提出了
145同样的质疑。查伽夫生于 1905 年。1928 年大学毕业，由
于生计去了美国，在哥伦比亚大学工作。他对核酸进行了
十分精密的分析，认识到它是很独特又复杂的大分子化合
物。它应该是一种高分子量的长链结构。虽然四种核苷酸
数量不等，表面没有一定规律，但本质是有规律的。他发
现了 1：1 的数论规律：即全部的嘌呤(A、G)总和与全部
的嘧啶(C、T)总和的比：或者 A 与 T、G 与 C 的比总是 1：
1。
遗传的研究是很有趣的，总离不开数论。从孟德尔的
三比一开始，米歇尔、科塞尔、莱文、查伽夫这四位化学
家，对生物大分子结构的研究，和孟德尔一样最终又碰到
了 1：1 的数论。
数论是不会离开生命遗传的。研究的越深入，这种数
学的约束力表现的越明显。它们以 1：1，发展为 1：1：1：
1,实质是(1：1)×(1·1)。像 3：1 发展为：9：3：3：
1,实质是(3：1)×(3：1)和(3：1)×(3：1)×(3：
1)…它们变换的无限性又总是符合 4、4、43、4”…
的无限性。可见 DNA 遗传有着内在的数理法则。
可科学的发展还在进行。DNA 的分子结构，还没有搞
清楚。因为单靠显微镜，根本观察不到 DNA 的分子结构。
就连高倍的电子显微镜也无能为力。因为，DNA 的分子是
在细胞核上，一个细胞核上，最小只有一微米即 10 厘米。
146而 DNA 分子链要比它所在的细胞核长上万倍。所以 DNA 分
子只能以纳米计算。用电子显微镜也看不到 DAN 分子。其
实我们至今也没有看到 DNA 的分子。
科学家阿斯特伯里想到了一个好办法。他利用 X 射线
能够穿透生物体，在感光底片上成像的原理。通过 X 射线
结晶衍射图来研究 DNA,找到了它多聚核苷酸分子长链的
排列踪迹。于是，在 20 世纪中叶，英国和美国隔洋相对，
形成了威尔金斯、富兰克林小组和鲍林小组，用 X 射线对
生物大分子结构进行研究的对抗赛。在激烈的竞争中，技
高一筹，头脑灵活，有着女性细腻的富兰克林取得了突破。
她在 1951 年 11 月，得到十分完美的 DNAX 射线结晶衍射
图，从而完成了捕捉 DNA 结构瞬间变化形象的历史使命。
这样，孟德尔和摩尔根从形式逻辑经典理论出发，在米歇
尔、科塞尔、莱文、查伽夫运用从化学方法研究生命遗传
的同时，阿斯特伯里、威尔金斯、富兰克林、鲍林通过 X
射线结晶衍射图示，共同相聚焦于神秘的 DNA。
揭开 DNA 分子结构之谜的一切条件都成熟了。这时，
正当英国和美国两个小组隔洋挑战竞赛，紧锣密鼓地展开
的时候。美国和英国各有一位年轻学子，却不期相遇在伦
敦，携手加入了对 DNA 分子结构的研究、挑战。比沃森大
12 岁的克里克性格怪异，从不拘小节，总是高谈阔论，
却和文静内向的美国人沃森配合默契。此时，威尔金斯和
147富兰克林正因性格不合，吵着要分手而驻足不前。
1951 年 11 月。富兰克林得到了完美的稀世珍宝 DNAX
射线结晶衍射图。1951 年，23 岁的沃森横渡太平洋来到英
国和克里克相逢。他们吸收了富兰克林失败了再干的拼搏
精神，使他们成为一颗巨型双星，放射出无比璀璨的光彩。
“失败了再干！”这是科学创新的普遍的规律。哪一位
科学家没有经受过失败的阵痛！沃森和克里克对 DNA 结构
模型的研究。一开始就走进了三链的误区。并错误地计算
其重复周期为 28×100 米。即使这样，他们也有胆识以自
认的重大突破，向世人公布了自己创造的三链 DNA 模型，
并请来了诸多专家、同行。富兰克林看到模型，一语道出
了其中的明显谬误： “这个模型过于依赖于水分子的参与
了…”失败给沃林和克里克带来的不仅仅是内心的痛
苦，由于沃森没有按原定课题研究，被终断了奖学金，连
吃饭都成了问题。而一向无所顾忌的克里克也不得不有所
收敛，暂时放下自己的 DNA,去研究搁置许久的蛋白质课
题。远离失败往往是人们下意识的自卫方式，可以休养生
息。然而，暂短的休整之后，成功的关键则在于能不能失
败了再干！这和登山的道理是一样的。当你登到半山腰，
累得喘不上气的时候，自然要停下来休息。可长期的休息
或就此结束返回山下，就失去了登上山顶的机遇和成功的
可能，成功就会永远离你而去。人总是要有那么一种韧性，
148一种任何失败都摧不垮，拖不倒的坚韧，才能和胜利、成
功有缘。
也就是说，支点，是成功的始点；失败才是成功的母
腹。获得了创新的支点，并不一定都能成功。只有失败了
再干，才能走进科学巨人的行列。沃森和克里克失败后的
缄默，恰恰给了他们反躬自问的契机。使他们认识到，：自
己占有资料的欠缺是最大的弊端。他们开始吸收鲍林用摆
积木， ‘立体造型组建 DNA 模型的方法，放弃了单纯用纸笔
勾画的平面思维：深入思索查伽夫关于全部的嘌呤(A、G)
总和与全部嘧啶(C、T)总和比，或者 A 或 T、G 与 C 的比，
总是 1：1 的互补含义，并同威尔金斯和富兰克林经常相互
探讨 DNA 的内在秘密。：当威尔金斯给沃森看富兰克林在
1951 年 11 月得到的一张十分完美、漂亮的 DNAX 射线结
晶衍射图时。沃林的灵感才能被激发，才能从 A 和 T 配对
与 G 和 C 配对的酷似形状，和等距性…看到了自发的内
在联系，从而突破了三链的误区，扭转了败局，终于走上了
成功之路，使孟德尔开创，经几代众多不同国籍的科学家不
间断寻求的神秘 DNA,显露出了自己的形态，显露出它神奇
的双螺旋结构，实现了遗传学理论划时代的突破众多的物
理学家、数学家、生物学家、化学家、动植物学家…都
以自己特定的方法和始点，在不同的地点和不同的角度探
索、研究着生命的秘密，不期相交在神秘的 DNA。
149150
第八章
《给年创新的支点》创新理论 2003 版科学历史回
顾
十三、基因到底是什么（按原版书章顺序号）
基因到底是什么？在这一支点上又会产生什么辉煌
呢？基因到底等不等于 DNA?我们不妨就此展开推论，以
便把支点讨论进行下去。
生命科学媒体往往把基因和·DA 不作明显的严格区
别。但是，作为基因这一遗传物最小单元，仍可分为更小
的内含子、外显子、启动子区、三联体、碱基等等，所以基
因不完全等于 DNA'。基因是 DNA 长链对应核酸链中的一个
片断，基因作为遗传物最小单元的概念就进入了信息区。如
果说 DNA 链是由核酸对应的螺旋构成的核酸链，如同储存
编码信息的磁带？那么基因并不是某单一遗传信息原子。
在磁带上，如果基因是遗传密码的信息库（以人为例 10
万个基因和每一组遗传密码的关系，应该是对应的)。那么
基因就等同了相应一组遗传密码…基因到底是什么？
还是让我们从头梳理一下，基因最早是孟德尔的遗传
因子。孟德尔还预言遗传因子在染色体上，提出“遗传因
子是染色体的一部分”的预言。1899 年约翰逊用基因代替
了孟德尔的遗传因子，只是从语言修辞上的考虑，·并没有
实质内容的变动。认为“基因”是一个很容易使用的小字
眼，很容易和别的字结合。接下来摩尔根用果蝇研究，形成了摩尔根基因论：即个体的种种性状，起源于生殖质内
联在一起的，形成若干连锁群的成对的元件（基因）；生殖
细胞成熟时，每一对的两个基因依孟德尔第一定律而彼此
分离。于是每个生殖细胞只含一组基因，不同连锁群内的
基因依孟德尔第二定律自由组合。相应的连锁群内的成员
基因之间有时也发生有秩序的交换。交换的频率可以提供
有关每个连锁群内成员间线形排列的证据。同时，.也能表
明成员相互之间的相对位置，并确定了交换、连锁遗传学第
三定律。简单地说：摩尔根认为基因是“元件” ，是若干连
锁的成对的元件。
1868 年米歇尔发现了“核素” ，理论上认为“核素”
就是现在的 DNA。后来又认识到，因为核素是酸性的，科学
家又将核素改为核酸，于是核酸就是 DNA。确定基因的载
体是 DNA 是由艾弗里的小鼠实验确认的。开始格里菲斯只
发现了 S 型菌转化为 R 型菌的“转化因子” ，艾弗里经过反
复实验确认， “转化因子”就是 DNA。请记住，到此基因只
是遗传物质，DNA=核酸。那么，基因到底是什么？基因等
不等于 DNA?
让我们再看一下这个等式。核素=核酸=脱氧核糖核
酸=DNA=转化因子=DNA。基因和它们并没有明显的等式。
我们先把基因放到一边，接下来是对 DNA 结构的研究。
核酸由更小的核苷酸构成。核苷酸有四种：即科塞尔搞清
151了 DNA 的四种成分 A、T、C、G。查伽夫接着发现了(A 和
G)总和与(C 和 T)总和之比；或 A 与 T、G 与 C 之比都符
合 1：1 构成数比的内在联系。也就是说 DNA 是由两种嘌呤
和两种嘧啶一碱基组成的双螺旋大分子链。三个碱基决
定一个磷酸。磷酸对应和糖基相连——这就是沃森和克里
克的 DNA 结构模型。于是克里克提出了又-…种基因理论。
克里克基因论：·基因就是 DA 双螺旋链上的一段核苷酸顺
序，携带着能在特定条件下表达的遗传信息。或者说核苷
酸排列顺序记录在 DNA 上的每一个信息为基因。这种全部
基因的总和=克里克的信息库。这么说，基因只是 DNA 上
的一个信息。最后基因又成了信息。再深入下去，三个核
苷酸决定一个氨基酸。这种 3：1 的不同排列顺序就构成
64 组遗传密码。解密和重组就产生了基因工程…遗传学
发展到了生命科学的实用阶段，这是生命科学的重大突破。
目前人们正热切关注着人类 10 万基因的破译一人基因组测
序，人们希望在 21 世纪用基因工程定向改造人类，创造新
的生命……
其实我们人类几千年来都在运用自然形成的定向培育
的方法改变着物种。以利于人类生存增长的需要。只不过
在基因革命之前，是以整株植物作为人工选择定向培育的
演化基点。而今天，把这个基点深入到了基因层面（原子）。
这并没有改变自然选择的整体概念。也就是说，人类从整
152株层面的定向选择，进入到分子层面的定向选择。只是人
类对生命认识从宏观到微观发展的必然过程。就像物理学
进入量子理论层面那样，是人类认识深入发展的必然结果。
事实上，几千年，基至几万年、几亿年。在自然本身，一
开始就是从分子层面上，甚至比这更微的粒子“弦”层面
开始的自然选择。只是在这之前未被人类发现和认识到而
已。因为人类只能利用大自然的法则，不会也绝不能创造
出自然本身不存在的法则。
上面讲述从孟德尔因子到基因工程的规律，只是人们从
原始的隐秘中把它们发现出来而已，而且这种发现远没到
达尽头。到目前为止，科学家还是不能回答基因到底是什
么？基因作为信息，能够创造出新的生命吗？基因是创造
出新的生命的机制吗？从生物现象而言。基因是最小的遗
传物质单位。是生命遗传的原子。是生命遗传的原子，应
该是不可分割的。
如果说（克里克的理论）基因是信息。那么信息是可
以分割的。从生物的化学结构看，每个构件又是由碳、氢、
氨、氢、氧、磷原子组成，有着和无机物相同的化学构成。
那么这些无机物又是怎样进入基因结构的呢？深层次的，我
们尚无法回答。现在只有同化理论…
从不同碱基的排序来看，基因模板三个碱基，扶手都
是由两端对应的糖基对磷酸、磷酸对糖基连接的。糖基和
153磷酸连接的指令来自基因，可糖基和磷酸连接的力和分开
的力，又来源何种机理和应力？
从熵的理论和宇宙能量的微循环理论看，能量转化是
有次序性的。释放能量必首先吸收能量。如果能量流停止，
立刻会产生并达到热力学平衡。生命蛋白质系统就会在一
瞬间死亡殆尽。这是热力学第二定律对生命的昭示。所以，
生物能流导致的基因振颤是生命“中微子层面”相关微小
粒子生物能量转换的能流振动的必然结果。
基因（信息）应该是永恒流动，振颤的生物能流？
另外基因并不单单在染色体内存在。在线粒体、叶绿
体都有 DNA 分子存在。它们也拥有复制机能，都具有合成
蛋白质的成套装备机构。我们不妨用基因理论（信息理论）
试探着去认识一下。
基因从其诞生（孟德尔的遗传因子）就是纯粹的观念
性的概念。到克里克基因=信息。信息是否等于生命的遗
传物质呢？我们还无从回答。因为至今还没有看到 DNA 这
是不争的事实。因为目前世界最强大的电子显微镜也只能
把观察物放大 25 万倍。要单独观察到双螺旋结构(DNA)
需要放大 100 亿倍。这是目前尚无法达到的。所以只能采
取间接的化学放大，观察的并非是个体对象（如蛋白质、
双螺旋)。由于生命是无法分割的活的整数系统：即生命的
每一步骤都是不可逆又不可停滞运转的，整数性单向连续
154整体系统网络。所以，我们也不可能看到活的 DNA 运转机
制。就连 1951 年 11 月富兰克林的 DNA 的 X 射线结晶衍射
图，也是集群落运转的瞬息即逝底片（只是生物化学手段
分解生命系统的个体微小集合形成的动态反馈)这是一个
偶然性杰作。这里面又反映了多少必然呢？概率论对纯偶
然性表述规律的正确性，如果是 102 万分之一的话。我们
可以怀疑富兰克林的 DNAX 射线结晶衍射图对沃森和克里
克 DNA 模型惟一性的支点作用吗？
基因是看不见、摸不到、闻不着的生命遗传现象的概
括，它并不是实实在在的实体。从生物现象而言，基因是
最小的遗传物质单位。可喻为遗传的原子，来源于孟德尔
的遗传因子。可为什么基因又是可任意分解、任意切割、
任意重组、任意结合的呢？…也可能，生命分子的分解、
切割、重组、结合本身就是生命细胞所固有的自然规律。
并不是基因带来的。就像我们把水分子分解成 H20 一样，
是自然的存在，并不是信息所使。同样，我们用 0 在一
定条件下也能合成水。因为有机界和无机界道理是相同的。
可是，基因是可以被修饰。然后重新放回生物体内，
这又如何解释呢？这一切都源于其本质。因此基因属于大
自然。假如，我们把基因切割掉某一节链环，再加入某一
人类培养的新的链环。把这修饰过的基因重新插入…这
是活体细胞本身就普遍具有的功能。就像壁虎能自动把断
155尾对接，这是生命细胞内存在的固有功能。
基因可以干燥、干燥储存，这又如何理解呢？这仍是
自然。几千年、几万年、几亿年，种子都是在秋风摇曳中，
失去水分，干燥储存。历尽严冬，春来萌发的。前面我们
讲过千年古莲子在北京植物园开花的奇迹。就是大自然的
匠心。基因在种子里自然而然可以干燥了，干而不死，万
世不灭，保持着生命的活力。那么，又如何认识基因可以
在试管中被合成？
基因在试管中被合成是基因概念形成一开始就带有的
语病。概念的东西，信息怎么会放到试管中去呢？我们放
入试管的是以某种人为组合的核酸链，对此我们仍然可以
说属于自然。那么，为什么又说基因可读昵？
让我们看一看基因是怎样可读的。这首先是把核酸序
列测出来，通常的方法是化学降解，和放射性标记。这样
就把核酸链切割成一个一个元件，（这实质是一种酶的正常
生物化学反应)对链的末端产生的特殊标记，也和染色体
的道理相同。电场作用，是自然的，能使切割后的链按
定长度排列。我们只要认定链末端的特殊标记，显示的是
嘧啶还是嘌呤（是 A 与 T、还是 G 与 C)就能直接读出基因
的序列。请注意：①我们解读的是核酸排序。②酶使核酸
分解是自然存在的生化反应。·③我们的特殊标记运用的是
自然存在的化学染色术，包括放射性标记。④分解后的链
156件在脱离酶反应之后必然重新排列。⑤从标记观察重新排
列的核酸，肯定能发现其变化的排列顺序。这就是基因可
读。这一过程的实质就是酶反应前和酶反应后的核酸变化，
和特殊标记一样。就像孟德尔收获时看到红花或白花一样，
运用的是自然存在的生化反应和生命遗传规律。而且，参
加反应的不是基因，是核酸。可读的是核酸排序，而不是
基因。我们在这里描述基因工程所运用的基因种种性质。
强调基因的一切功能纯属于自然。是天生地造的。并不是
否认人类对生命认识的发展；并不是否认生命科学理论重
大突破的基因工程的实践作用。确实，人类的认识从达尔
文自然选择的整个个体生命遗传现象，进入到孟德尔一克里
克原子层面的生命遗传现象。这一规律的揭示本身就是科学
重大突破，但这并不等于基因就是生命的一切。明天基因理
论，还会向细胞核内更深层次深入发展。还会有更震动人心
的突破。现在科学家都对细胞膜进行抢滩式的攻关研究，就
能证明。这就是说，自然选择存在着宏观自然选择和微观自
然选择。达尔文论述的重点是前者，孟德尔一克里克阐述的
是后者的规律。而这前后两者同样都属于大自然固有的规
律。
纵观生命遗传理论、实践—一克隆一基因工程一
遗传密码…只能界定在细胞阶段（细胞与细胞之间）。形
成胚胎前的某个极早的切合点。当胚胎细胞形成并演化到
157器官或组织的阶段，运用克隆手段，即使实现其完全整合。
要使生命体产生整体的遗传现象，根本是不可能的。比如
我们对某一动物个体进行某一器官移植。假设已经达到完
全整合，它杂交繁殖的子代能得到父或母（系）移植整合
的器官性状特征吗？肯定是不会的。这就像一个人换上了
别人的肾，他康复后，性交所产生的子代能发育出两个有
差异的肾器官吗？显然不能。这就界定了克隆仅仅存在细
胞层面。这和嫩小的柳树条可以遍插成林，而把柳树粗壮
的树干锯下来，插在土里根本不能存活繁殖的道理相同。
在适宜的环境内，任何生命体细胞都有全息复制，再生个
体生命的能力。这是大自然留给生命个体繁衍，免于种灭
绝最隐秘的功能和最后的防线。这已经隐藏了几十亿年，
和种子落地在适宜的环境内萌发一样自然。克隆无需震撼，
因为它并没有创造出超自然的生命法则。
也就是说克隆并没有超出大自然对生命微观选择的手
段。人类的双胞胎就是自然克隆的产物。我们仍然认为，
人（科学）不能创造出大自然本身并不存在的法则。克隆
也是一种法则。是大自然早就存在的生命法则。这就是为
什么克隆羊只能在羊种种性制约下克隆出多莉，而不能克
隆出羊种以外动物个体生命。因这种种性制约机制是大自
然最严格的机制，这种严格来源于生命的复杂性和有序性。
个体生命的任何一个小的环节，都包含着这种生命的复杂
158性和有序性。只要这种复杂的有序性在生物个体的某一微
小的环节被破坏，·就会引发该生命个体的死亡。这就是对
违背这种机制的报复。报复也是大自然自然选择的一部分。
这样，自然选择就会在生命的每一个小的环节发挥作用。
也就是说自然选择是从生命个体的细胞阶段就产生自然选
择效应的。它存在于生命个体的每一微小的环节，和每一
个生命个体的各个阶段，和整个个体生命的全过程。自然
选择是通过种的个体生命来表现自然的成果。也就说达尔
文是从种与个体生命一生命的宏观，来研究论述自然选
择的。今天，我们把这种自然选择理论延伸到生命细胞分
子，生命遗传原子和生命“中微子层面” ，生命微小的“弦”
的界面一生命的微观来研究自然选择。事实上，自然选
择是生命和大自然的双向选择。生命个体自觉不自觉地选
择最佳生存环境。动植物的迁徙就是这种选择的结果。这
种生命个体对自然的选择，应包括生命个体之间，个体和
种群之间，种群与种群之间复杂的生命链和大生命场的个
体群落多层次自然选择。实际上，这种复杂的有序选择的
存在是场性的。就像牛顿重力场的无形存在，发生着重力
作用一样。自然选择也是一种特殊的无形的场。这种场作
用维系整合着整个生命的演化与发展。我们把它叫做生命
力场。这是一种普遍的生命活力的场。从遗传基因普遍存
在于动植物、微生物及所有生命物个体细胞之中的机理，
159就能证明这种生命力场的真实存在。同样它和物理学重力
场、电磁场的本质都是能量场的场能量循环。任何生命个
体细胞、基因都只有适应这种普遍存在的生命力场内在的
能量场循环，别无选择。
从宇宙大生命场这更大的宏观看。存在两个大的能量
循环体系，无机界能量循环和有机界能量循环。这两个能
量循环体系，各自存在不同系统，不同层面，不同层次的
能量转换的不同循环系统。每个层面的能量转换，都表现
在能量微循环过程。同样有机界和无机界之间的界面，能
量循环是通过植物微小的叶绿体（素)来实现的。这是宇
宙能量的微循环方式的最好证明。宇宙能量的微循环是润
物无声的。让我们来观察光合作用。我们用肉眼看不到，
用耳朵也听不到，我们和绿色植物之间的思维也无法感知。
我们只能照抄现在的书本理论：绿色植物细胞中的叶绿素，
分秒不停地吸收阳光的能量。在把光能转化为生物化学能
的同时，缓慢地一点一点地同化无机物，实现无机到有机
的能量和物质的微循环。”
“那么？基因呢？基因在生命最重要、最基本的生命
能量转换的微循环过程中，应起到的作用又是什么呢？难
道基因只存在生命遗传现象，用于遗传密码、基因工程、
克隆……除此之外，别无它用吗？”
你看这是否触摸到了一个科学创新的支点。假如基因、
160叶绿素、阳光能运作成新的生物技术，人类依赖石油能源
的历史将永远结束。
第八章 富兰克林千古无法磨灭的 DNA 历史功绩
一 美女科学家富兰克林的“名义学位”
1930 年年轻美丽的富兰克林就读于伦敦圣保罗女子
学校（St Paul's Girls' School）。
1938 年进入剑桥大学纽纳姆学院（Newnham College，
Cambridge），纽纳姆学院成立于 1871 年，是剑桥特色鲜明
的三个女子学院之一。位于剑河以西偏南，校区面积很大，
建筑风格基本上都是红房白窗，还有精心布置的花园和喷
泉，校园非常优美。剑桥最大的女子学院，本科生约 400 人，
研究生约 150 人，院士约 70 人，非常有特色的一个学院。富
兰克林在 1941 年顺利完成大学学业，当时的剑桥大学并不
授与女性“文学士”（BA Cantab.）学位，因此富兰克林只
拥有一个“名义上的学位”（degree titular）。
史载后人发现：遗留在富兰克林读书笔记上有一张图，
得知她曾经在 1939 年期间在构思过 DNA 的化学结构，并且
画出一个螺旋型图样；可见 1951 年的衍射图富兰克林早就
胸有成竹——成功是给有准备的头脑！
二 富兰克林获得博士学位二战后进入国王学院
1942 年 8 月，第二次世界大战需求，富兰克林进入位在
泰晤士河上京士顿的不列颠煤炭利用协会，公关煤的多孔性
161162
和对于强力碳纤维的研究；
1945 年富兰克林以论文《固态有机石墨与煤和相关物质
的特殊关系之物理化学》获得了物理化学的博士学位。
1946 年前往法国巴黎工作，在当地的国家中央化学实验
室；
1950 年，富兰克林受聘前往伦敦大学国王学院任职。
1951 年 1 月，富兰克林开始在国王学院进行研究工作，
她所任职的部门是医学研究委员会（Medical Research
Council，简写为 MRC）中，由物理学家约翰·蓝道尔主持的
生物物理研究单位，蓝道尔决定富兰克林的研究主题从蛋白
质的 X 射线晶体衍射，指派转型投入 DNA 化学结构的研究。
三
衍射图原理与算法
衍射图原理：在经典物理学中，波在穿过狭缝、小孔或
圆盘之类的障碍物后会发生不同程度的弯散传播。假设将一
个障碍物置放在光源和观察屏之间，则会有光亮区域与阴晦
区域出现于观察屏，而且这些区域的边界并不锐利，是一种
明暗相间的复杂图样。这现象称为衍射，当波在其传播路径
上遇到障碍物时，都有可能发生这种现象。除此之外，当光
波穿过折射率不均匀的介质时，或当声波穿过声阻抗
（acoustic impedance）不均匀的介质时，也会发生类似的
效应。在一定条件下，不仅水波、光波能够产生肉眼可见的
衍射...相干衍射成像;相干光源照明条件下，通过物波衍射或干涉光场强度分布获取波前相位信息实现二维或者三维
物体成像的技术称为相干衍射成像（CDI）。
相干衍射成像(CDI )是从衍射分布中恢复出物体原图像
的过程。物波光场的复振幅函数有振幅和相位两部分组成，
物波场的衍射或干涉光场的振幅信息一般通过感光胶片或
者数字图像传感器如 CCD 可以方便的记录其强度分布获得，
但是图像传感器不能直接探测波前的相位信息，恢复原图像
即重建物波函数需要同时知道其振幅信息和相位信息。
主要有三种迭代算法：
1、GS 算法
GS 算法也称为误差下降算法，物波函数在空域和频域
的交替迭代计算过程中，空域强度分布和频域强度分布作为
单一迭代约束条件，存在着收敛性迭代‘停滞’问题。
2、HIO 算法
改进了误差减少 ER 算法并进一步发展了混合输入输出
HIO 算法,克服了临界问题,在相位衍射成像中被广泛使用。
3、TIE 算法
基本原理是测量沿光传播方向的光强变化推算出垂直
方向的相位分布，目前比较常用的解 TIE 方程的方法是傅里
叶变换法;GS 算法;HIO 算法;ER 算法;基于强度测量的相
位恢复算法的核心思想就是通过求解光强传播方程（TIE ），
从强度信息中计算出相位信息。
163光强传播的方程(TIE )可以写为：;由于迭代算法通常
存在计算量大和迭代收敛性问题，提出了基于波前调制或抽
样的波前检测和衍射成像方法。
这类方法的基本思路是：（a）在被测样品和图像传感
器记录平面之间引入某种具有特定透过率分布的波前调制
或抽样元件……
四 富兰克林 A 型衍射图的三维立体概念隐含量子属性
年轻的富兰克林运用 X 射线衍射技术，1950 年拍到了清
晰的 DNA 晶体衍射图。目前已知自然界中的三种 DNA 型态，
由左至右分别是 A 型、B 型与 Z 型。
1950 年威尔金斯从瑞士科学家鲁道夫·席格纳（Rudolf
Signer）手上得到（无偿提供）一种纯 DNA 样品，这种样品
淬取自小牛胸腺，其性质比较适合 X 射线衍射分析。它干燥
时呈细小的针簇状，一旦遇潮会变成一团黏胶状物质。后来
富兰克林与葛斯林发现了 DNA 的其中两种型态，在潮湿状态
下，DNA 的纤维会变的较长较细，称做 A 型；而干燥的时候
则变得较短较粗，称为 B 型。
1951 年 11 月，富兰克林提出了 A 型 DNA 的 X 射线衍
射图，并进行了一场演讲说：
“DNA 分子中的磷酸根在外侧，碱基在内侧”结构，并算
出 DNA 分子内部的轴向、距离和螺旋的直径与长度。这些结
论为 DNA 双螺旋结构模型的建立提供了重要依据——磷酸根
164165
在螺旋的外侧构成两条多核苷酸链的骨架，互相平行而方向
相反；碱基在螺旋内侧，两两对应。如图：
沃森此时在剑桥大学威廉·劳伦斯·布拉格主持的
卡文迪许实验室研究蛋白质结构；沃森与克里克得知了富
兰克林衍射图信息，立刻尝试排列 DNA 的螺旋结构，
突发奇想一种“三螺旋”模型；并邀请富兰克林、威
尔金斯与葛林斯参观，富兰克林看过批评说“太依赖
水分子了”……富兰克林的批评，直接导致沃森与克
里克被布拉格终止 DNA 结构研究！……
五
科学史上唯一悼念 A 型 DNA 双螺旋结构讣闻
富兰克林与葛斯林制作的讣闻，用来悼念 A 型 DNA（结晶状 DNA）的双螺旋结构。当年，国王学院的科学家们大多
数已接受 B 型 DNA 的结构为螺旋型，对于 A 型 DNA 是否也同
样是螺旋型，富兰克林则仍持怀疑态度。于是，富兰克林与
葛斯林曾开玩笑地制作了一份讣闻，悼念结晶状 DNA（A 型
DNA）失去的螺旋结构。
尽管是“玩笑”悼图完全、充分暴露了富兰克林不甘
落后、弃旧图新、一往无前探索研究的性格特色：
A 型 DNA 双螺旋结构讣闻：
六 现代史以来最美的一张 X 射线照片
1952 年 5 月富兰克林与葛林斯经过深刻研究，
拍得一张 B 型 DNA 的 X 射线晶体衍射照片，用来解决
X 射线晶体衍射问题的帕特生函数（Patterson
function）图片分析，史称“照片 51 号”——X 射线
166167
晶体衍射先驱约翰·贝尔那（John Desmond Bernal）
称赞形容说：
“几乎是有史以来最美的一张 X 射线照片。”
DNA 衍
射图像
七
A 型 DNA 对称性水到渠成构成双螺旋结构
1952 年 11 月，富兰克林也提出并说明 A 型 DNA
的对称性，意思是 DNA 的结构即使翻转 180 度之后看
起来还是一样。66666 鉴此， A 型 DNA 对称性构成双
螺旋结构！研究结果收录在一份用来提交给访问委员
会（visiting committee）的“MRC 报告”中。1952 年 11 月，莱纳斯·鲍林也开始研究 DNA 结
构认为：DNA 应该是外侧为碱基，以及内侧为磷酸；
确认 DNA 的结构是三股螺旋，并发表了一篇论文。富
兰克林曾亲自寄给莱纳斯·鲍林一信指出错误……
这里，核心讨论的是“双股（双螺旋）的内结构：
外侧磷酸与内侧碱基或者‘三螺旋’”。
一个多月后，当 1953 年 1 月，威尔金斯悄悄把照
片 51 号拿给沃森看过并详细地解释富兰克林的研究
结果后，沃森和克里克立刻取得历史性突破，经过 2
个星期迅速写出一篇 3000 字的文章，于 1953 年 4 月
25 日在英国科学《自然》杂志上发表。
这里，为什么能配以千字的短文和威尔金斯和富
兰克林认证的文章？这仍然是一个千古之谜！
于是，10 年后的 1962 年沃森和克里克、威尔金
斯获得诺贝尔奖
八 、三篇论文同时在《自然》发表彰显第一原创
者错位
51DNA 衍射图像的第一原创者是富兰克林（1953
年 1 月，威尔金斯悄悄把照片 51 号拿给沃森看过并详
细地解释富兰克林的研究结果后，沃森和克里克立刻
取得历史性突破），这是一种盗取知识产权行为，所
以《自然》发表 3000 字文章时，受布拉格与蓝道尔的
168质疑并介入，《自然》（Nature）期刊只得于 1953
年 4 月 25 日同时发表三篇论文。
顺序以沃森与克里克为先，二是威尔金斯等人，
最后是富兰克林——本末倒置！
富兰克林的论文是与葛斯林共同发表，论文名称
是《胸腺核酸的分子结构》（Molecular Configuration
in Sodium Thymonucleate）。
虽然沃森与克里克在论文中提及他们是受到威尔
金斯与富兰克林等人的启发，并未详细说明“51 号图”
决定性突破作用，更没有一点点致谢。
更有甚者，威尔金斯与富兰克林在论文中表示自
己的（三螺旋）数据与沃森和克里克的模型相符。
悲剧就这样发生了：1953 年 3 月，富兰克林离开
了国王学院，进入伦敦大学的伯贝克学院（Birkbeck
College， London），完全没有带走她的研究成果。
这时候威尔金斯还写了一封信给克里克，表示“黑暗
女士”（Darklady，指富兰克林）已经离开了他们的
实验室，终于可以开始向大自然的秘密前进—— “女
权运动分子”完成了 DNA 结构的历史使命就变成了“黑
暗女士” ，抑郁而终!
九 “黑暗女士”千古不朽的伟大女神科学家
1944 年已经有科学家实验证明脱氧核糖核酸 DNA 是真
169正的生物遗传物质，但一直没有人能够对 DNA 的结构做出解
析。罗莎琳德·富兰克林（Rosalind Franklin）在剑桥大
学学习时的 1939 年，就在自己的读书笔记构思画出 DNA 的
化学结构、一个螺旋型图样。富兰克林出生在英国的一个犹
太人家庭，性格刚强、理念专著，带有一些“女权运动分子”
的气息，可谓男性学术圈的异端，注定是影响千古的女神科
学家！
1951 年富兰克林出众的 X 射线衍射分析技术，破格被英
国物理学家约翰·蓝道尔（John Randall）纳入麾下，富兰
克林刚进入实验室，就全身心投入到了工作中。
富兰克林
1701952 年 5 月富兰克林与葛林斯经过深刻研究，拍得
一张 B 型 DNA 的 X 射线晶体衍射照片，被约翰·贝尔那赞誉
为“有史以来最美的一张 X 射线照片”！
与其鲜明对比的是：为什么威尔金斯指桑骂槐说富兰
克林是“黑暗女士”？
也许，富兰克林有些孤芳自赏地傲慢，太执着从事科
学研究了，在威尔金斯与富兰克林合作过程，并非言听计从，
往往令威尔金斯很不愉快；威尔金斯认为富兰克林是自己的
助手，富兰克林却自始至终坚持自己是一个独立的课题负责
人，表现出才华出众、实验大师的女科学家风采！始终如一
专著实验！工作！研究！成功！
罗莎琳德·埃尔西·富兰克林 1952 年 5 月拍摄的 DNA
晶体衍射图片“照片 51 号” ，以及关于此物质的相关数据，
是詹姆斯·沃森与佛朗西斯·克里克解出 DNA 结构获得诺贝
尔奖的科学发现关键物证，是一种知识产权盗取。 1958 年，
富兰克林因支气管肺炎及卵巢癌逝世，抑郁而终。
为了纪念富兰克林的伟大功绩，欧洲和俄罗斯携手研
制的一架火星漫游车被命名为“罗莎琳德·富兰克林”。按
计划该漫游车将于 2020 年 7 月 25 日发射升空，2021 年 2
月降落火星表面，寻找火星生命迹象并执行各种任务——正
是富兰克林在伦敦大学功成名就的本能缘原；虽然早离世 4
年与诺贝尔奖失之交臂，确与 BNA 诺贝尔奖连着骨头带着筋，
171172
可惜 38 岁英年早逝，错过诺贝尔奖，依然是千古不朽的伟
大女神科学家!
第九章 《整体板块遗传律》宇宙大爆炸整体生命
学理论与西方科学家最新遗传理论对照文摘见证 与
讨论
1、美国天普大学的 Carmen Sapienza 说： “也许
还存在更基本的机制有待去发现，我认为，我们已经进入了
自从有遗传学以来最有趣的时代。”
▲我们就提出来“种性制约机制”-《整体板块遗
传律》！
2、
澳大利亚昆士兰大学分子生物学研究所所长
S.Mattick 说：
“我认为这将成为正统理论扭曲对事实进行客观分析的一
个经典案例，这种扭曲长达 25 年。不能充分认识这些事实
的意义，尤其是不能认识非编码序列的介入可能以 RNA 分子
的形式传递平行信息，可能成为分子生物学史上最大的错误
之一。”
▲我们认为错误的根源就在于背离了“整体生命
学”的本质：生命是一个整体！所以实验科学的从局部出发，
举一反三，往往导致管窥现象（tunneI vision）现在已经173
暴露了反向遗传学的局限性。
3、 2003 年 5 月，日本崎玉医科大学广常真治（Shinii
Hirotsune）
领导的一个遗传学家小组，报告他们发现了第一个功能
性的假基因。
▲ 我们早在《整体板块遗传律》书稿中提出： “盲基
因”概念——在“四论 Q 律”论文中，我们强调说： “从孟
德尔和摩尔根到巴巴拉.麦克林托克的基因层面，遗传基因
是对板块基因存在的实验证明。板块基因不仅证明了生命整
体板块遗传系统工程调控系统的真实存在，更深层次的含义
表达了基因存在盲基因，（不能表达功能的基因）；和盲基
因可能转变成功能基因。这种功能的基因才能表达某种对应
的生命性状。……”《整体板块遗传律》在 200 4 年 4 月 15
日，于清华大学水利楼宣读， “盲基因”概念提出，早于日
本崎玉医科大学广常真治的报告时间。
4、
S.Mattick 还指出： “RNA 的优点是它有一个特殊的
序列，因此它是数字化的，就像邮政编码一样。”
▲ 生命数字化和种性制约机制是整体板块遗传律的核
心。所以整体板块遗传律的中文表述是： “生物任何种性性
状 都 隐 秘 在 整 体 板 块 遗 传 密 码 方 阵 的 数 字 化 程 序
中，构成整体的种性制约机制，保证种的延续。破坏整体板块遗传的唯一选择是个体死亡与种的灭绝。”所以，整体板
块遗传律的数字化表现形态是生命螺旋线，数学表达式是 J
——Q 方程。
5、 据报道 2004 年 CDC 就开始利用 1997 年香港禽流感爆发
时期菌株和实验室常用的人类流感病毒制造杂交病毒，无论
再重组实验和 6 年禽流感病毒（H5N1）的销声匿迹，直到 2003
年——2004 年南亚禽流感大爆发，其人工选择和自然选择都
不能使 H5N1 菌株和人类流感病毒重组变异，而产生人类世
界流感大爆发。从而科学家发现：H5N1（禽）和人类流感病
毒（H3N2 或 H1N1）重组障碍重重，又无法解释这些现象。
那么 H5N1 为什么不能和 H3N2、H1N1 结合，变异产生人畜共
染的超级重组病毒原因又是什么呢？就在于种性制约机制
阻止了人畜流感病毒重组变异。任何跨越人畜种性的变异个
体都将被淘汰，甚至为保证种的延续，而不惜（人工自然）
选择其变异个体死亡与种的灭绝。从而杜绝超级重组流感病
毒产生。于是，表现出对不同种病毒重组障碍重重。
▲ 我们在《整体板块遗传律》阐述说： “什么是种
性制约机制呢？就是物种以整体板块基因与生命数理平衡
的自然选择。可见种性制约的目的是通过数字化生命密码优
选的排列组合数比，控制功能基因表达不变的性状和可自由
组合的性状变异的系统调控。基因表达某种生命性状完全是
174175
由这种机制调控的系统工程。”正如(Observe)指出：
“H5N1 菌株一直威胁着人类的健康。今年在越南和泰国感染
的 34 名病人中死亡者高达 23 人。然而，迄今为止，所有确
诊的病人都是与被感染禽类有过接触的。没有证据表明病毒
可以在人与人之间传播。”
6、诺贝尔获得者毕晓普发现原始癌细胞变异，所有癌细胞
都存在“亲戚专属性” ，每一个癌细胞都和原始基因癌细胞
是“亲戚” ，每一个癌细胞都无法跨越这种 “亲戚专属性”
这和人畜流感病毒无法重组，变异障碍重重的机理相同。 均
源于种性制约机制！
▲ 我们可以大胆预言，即使明天爆发世界性病毒大流
感，也不会产生在人与人之间传播的人禽（H5N1+ H3N2 或
H1N1）重组变异流感灾难。
7、美国耶鲁大学 R.Breaker 的实验室研究发现基因开关。
2003 年 8 月，Breaker 及其合作者报告说：一个核糖开关家
族控制了一种常见厨房细菌
BaciIIus subtiIis 中的至少
26 种表达。
▲关于“基因表达”整体概念，我们在《整体板块遗传律》
中已经提出。即： “盲基因可能转变成功能基因。
这种功能的基因才能表达某种对应的生命性状——板
块基因就相当于密钥字母的整体加密。它是沃森和克里克从DNA 模型揭示的“碱基序列”藏密之外的整体板块基因联动
加密的语言。它是另一套遗传物质整体的活的复制机制。这
种机制有更强的藏密性，特别是这种机制又受时间基因制
约……”这是整体板块基因联动加密全新的“基因表达”概
念。……
8、生命的整体性是细胞自身自生的。西方科学家早有细胞
层面的生命整体性认识。1600 年，胡克发现细胞就以 ceII
或 ceIIs（小房间、有生命的小房间）来命名。胡克用 ceII
或 ceIIs 描述细胞，在于强调生命大分子是一个整体概念。
生命是必须具有活性，必须是一个封闭严实的固有“小房
间”——最小的独立系统的无穷集合。软性是由生命水溶
性固有的属性决定的。事实上，胡克的“小格子”中是含
有复杂化学成分的某些液体的生命琼浆；是自立门户，自
繁殖的生命组织，它构成了软性封闭系统的系统大分子（小
格子—小房间）的无穷集合。是生命结构的基本生命单位。
用植物学家马蒂亚斯.施莱施的话说： “细胞是自己有生命
的不能再小的单位。”
▲ 今天需要强调的是系统和软性。即生命的整体性和生命
非刚性运动。因为所有的细胞均来自有生命的 ceII 细胞，
其分化只能是在软性—封闭—系统内自组织的分化，这充分
表达了生命“整体来自整体”的本质。因为一切细胞都来源
176于细胞，所以就形成了胚胎期的生命整体性。如何证明胚胎
期的生命整体性呢？让我们以人为例，女性两条 X 染色体，
在女婴胚胎隐秘一条 X 染色体的过程，正是整体板块基因联
动加密全新的“基因表达”概念，也是整体板块遗传的最有
力证明。人体女性遗传了两条活性 X 染色体，男性比女性少
遗传了其中一条染色体。一个女婴胚胎必须隐秘一条 X 染色
体，使其处于盲基因非活性状态，以有效防止它的细胞获得
双倍数量的 X 染色体，这完全是一个整体过程。
9、美国科学家研究指出： “基因组机制的两个部分共同关
闭第三部分。一个名为 Xist 非编码基因产生一个活性 RNA，
它能封闭不需要的 X 染色体，同时需要的染色体产生反义
RNA，它能起类似解毒剂的作用来保护 X 染色体不受 Xist
基因的抑制。一个链锁反应沿不需要的染色体传播开来：
甲基标记 DNA 的大部分，组蛋白从其尾巴上去掉乙酰基化
合物，而且染色质压缩成一个难以进入的、RNA 封闭的团块。
当女性发育成长时，沉默的 X 染色体接着被传递给每一个
由基因组产生的细胞，并仍然保持失活。”
▲这是系统的基因组和蛋白质组；指令、信息到执行、功
能……（涵概空间、时间、活细胞体、自繁殖） 的生命运
动整体过程。
《整体板块遗传律》不但制约着分子生物学、反向遗传
学的瓶颈；同样也制约着蛋白质组的研究与发展。基因是生
177命信息，生物功能的执行者是蛋白质。基因传达信息，转录、
翻译指令；它和蛋白质功能的执行是一个系统整体过程。信
息、执行、功能紧密吻合，其中还存在一个生命动力学原理
问题。有了动力，才存在生命运转过程，才有生命的活性。
10、基因的活动，蛋白质组的功能的运转，都离不开生命动
力。离开了生命动力，一切都是虚拟的，无生命的。蛋白质
组（proteome）是“ pROEin 与 genoME 的杂合，指“一种基
因组所表达的全套蛋白质。”可见它并没有离开基因组的平
台。这是澳大利亚科学家 Marc WiIkins1994 年提出的，并
首倡澳大利亚实验室创立蛋白质组研究中心。十年已经有 10
个国家参与研究，取得了巨大的成绩，已开始实施临床蛋白
质组学计划。
▲ 一个基因对应着几到十几种蛋白质，细胞又是由成
千上万蛋白质构成。蛋白质在细胞中，又是如何运转工作的
呢？它能够离开细胞的整体运转摸式吗？生命的整体性是
蛋白质组学发展必须面对的课题。
11、1986 年 3 月 7 日雷托.杜伯克开始的人类基因组计
划，历时 17 年已经完成。可编码基因，只占人类基因总量
的 2%，98%的基因功能仍在未知之中。20 年后，当雄心勃勃
的人类蛋白质组计划完成时，在基因组平台上的蛋白质组能
超越2%的平台视窗吗？比基因组计划困难100倍的蛋白质组
计划，能突破生命整体性瓶颈的制约吗？
178179
因为，我们必须跨越基因组 2%的编码平台！即使跨越了
基因组 2%的编码平台，又如何面对蛋白质和基因同样是生命
整体运动链条中的小小一环，往往会产生或导致管窥现象
（tunneI vision）呢！？
▲ 我们认为“整体生命学”是明天生命科学的希望……20
年后考虑蛋白质组的管窥现象（tunneI vision），到不如
今天叩开、走进“整体生命学”的大门！
12、美国加州大学旧金山分校 StanIey B. Prusiner 普鲁西
纳教授 1982 年因发现朊病毒，于 1997 年获诺贝尔奖。朊病
毒对分子生物学构成了重大挑战，它是迄今为止唯一不含任
何核酸物质的传染因子，它无需 DNA 信息复录指令，就会诱
发产生令人毛骨悚然的疯牛病，造成致死性中枢神经系统慢
性退行性疾病（克-雅氏病、疯牛病、疯鹿病、羊搔痒病、
猫海绵状脑病、传染性雪貂白质脑病、震颤病……）“朊病
毒是可以自发产生的， ”甚至“任何一种哺乳动物都可以自
发产生朊病毒。”最近 B. Prusiner 撰文指出： “但最令人
震惊的是：朊蛋白并不总是坏的。事实上，迄今为止所有的
实验动物都有编码朊蛋白的基因。朊蛋白的正常构象 PrPc
主要存在于神经细胞，可能有助于维持神经元的功能。但它
可以转变成异常构象的 PrPcs 而引起疾病。”PrPc
PrPcs
的功能改变与 DNA 无关，朊病毒只是蛋白颗粒粒。▲ PrPc PrPcs 是最典型的生命“整体来自整体”的变异表
达 模 式 。 西 方 认 为 疯 牛 病 起 因 于 “ 肉 骨 餐 ”
（meat-and-bonemeaI），但由食 物转化形成 PrPc 到 PrPcs
的变异的机理，已经超出了基因与蛋白质组的平台，目前科
学家尚无法解释。我们认为“肉骨餐”（meat-and-bonemeaI）
导致的疯牛病应该从“生命动力学原理”去探索。我们把疯
牛病病因认作是“生物能饥饿症”详细理论出自《生命动力
学原理》。
13、从人类生命科学史去考察，生物学是 19 世纪替代“自
然哲学”的产物，由拉马克首先提出；遗传学是对自古以来
“传宗接带”或“世袭性质”等生命本质的猜测而创造出来
的。近代遗传学是 20 世纪初由德弗里斯、柯灵斯、丘谢马
克三位不同国家的植物学家，同时重新发现孟德尔遗传定律
开始突破的，并很快得到摩尔根的发展；特别是查伽夫的证
明，并发展成为现代分子生物学。然而，科学家对孟德尔大
群落性实验相比，更感兴趣的是对基因理论的应用，遂使分
子生物学向基因工程，反向遗传学迅速发展，并开拓了基因
组学和基因组计划的商业性专利目标。
▲可见现代分子生物学仅仅继承了孟德尔的简单和单一性
状的应用，向反向遗传学深入发展。却遗忘了复合性状，往
往是由许多基因所共同控制的遗传事实；忘却了整体生命学
180的群体层面，基因板块和种性制约机制的生命理论价值。所
以，我们说用生物学、分子生物学替代整体生命学是科学史
上最大的误区！事实上，任何生命物都必须具备四大要素。
即：时间、空间、活细胞体、自繁殖。所以分子生物学不能
离开时间基因和单纯地研究自繁殖去取代对整体生命科学
的研究；特别是忽视了空间环境与活细胞体与生命基因、蛋
白质组同时、同一性运动存在的生命本质。管窥现象（tunneI
vision）让我们不得不反思：只强调自繁殖（一要素）的 2%
基因编码，就能完全认识和掌握生命科学规律的神话，这是
所有科学家心知肚明的真理。所以，用整体生命学跨越分子
生物学，将是生命科学史发展必然的历史大趋势！
第十章 《整体板块遗传律》理论兼“种性
制约机制”与西方科学家最新遗传学理论对
照文摘与讨论（续）
1、 “细胞来自细胞”是整体生命学的整体基础，
它演绎出生命“整体来自整体” 、 “有序来自有序”
的生命体系，构成了生命个体的整体性与物种的整体
性、稳定性。从近年新的热点学科“系统生物学”的
研究方向看，它仅仅局限在整体描述细胞的功能，即
细胞的整体功能分析，着重的是生物学信息，并没有
离开分割生命的的平台和 DNA 定量数据的标准化信息
应用。为什么科学家不从细胞整体功能的研究为契机
181去认识“整体生命学”的客观规律呢？西方科学家布
丰早在 18 世纪中叶，就认识到生命物种是自然界中
“客观和基本的事实” ；所以以整体的属性定义物种，
认为物种是“不依赖于数目和时间的一个整体；一个
相同的也总是生活着的整体；一个可算作为上帝创造
物之一的整体，因此也是上帝创造物中的一个单个的
单位。”
如果我们把“上帝”改为“自然”就更能真实反映
生命整体的客观规律，摆脱了布丰所处时代神与宗教
的局限性。生命物种整体属性的根本原因，正如布丰
所陈述的： “因为每种物种都是一种单独的创造物。
它的第一个个体就是它后代的模式；物种是被一些不
可逾越的鸿沟所分开的整体。事实上，物种的整体性
与稳定性不单单来自细胞的整体与稳定性，更重要的
法则是物种的整体与稳定性是来自种性制约机制。今
天的高科技并不能否定物种是一个整体，我们对生命
科学研究的越深入，这种整体性的种性制约就越鲜明。
正如 1735 年林耐的《自然系统》归纳的物种本性：
“（1）由于不存在新种；
（2）由于一种生命总是产生与其同类的生物；
（3）由于每种物种中的每个个体总是其后代的开
始，因此必须把这些祖先的不变性归于某个全知的神，
182这个神就叫做上帝，他的工作就是创造世界万事万物
——（我们把上帝叫做种性制约机制）这是被每个有
生命个体的机制、原理、定律、体质和感觉所证明的。”
我们把（3）中的这段话——（某个全知的神，这
个神就叫做上帝，他的工作就是创造世界万事万物）
用“种性制约机制”替换，就成了林耐物种分类整体
原则的现代版。因为林耐抓住了物种最本质的属性“每
个生物体都是从一个卵中产生的；而从每个卵中所产
生出的都是一个和亲代极其相似的后代。”因此繁殖
增加个体的数量并没有增加物种的数目。所以， “种
性制约机制”形成了物种的整体性和稳定性；稳定的
物种特性才能够成为分类的基本单位与原则；双名法
（属名和种名）才能延用至今。
2、《圣经》的一句箴言是：上帝总要保持他创造的全
部物种！
这种表述即使为上帝带来物种不变的误区，但也
暴露出“种性制约机制”生命状态性是“客观和基本
的事实”。虽然约翰.雷 John Ray 经长期大量的观察
发现植物的“退化”（如麦子退化成黑麦草属的植物，
玉米退化成另一种杂草等。）和化石显示绝种的迷惑
不解；然而， “退化”产生的物种性状变化和化石显
示的种灭绝与“种性制约机制”并不矛盾。因为“种
183性制约机制”的终点表达是死亡与灭绝；麦子和玉米
“退化”是种的灭绝在短时间可观察 到的准 “化石”
表达，是只有在长期才能显示出来的准“化石”绝种
的生命现象的即时表达。根据种群遗传学家理查德.
列昂丁长期观察认为：变异并不能解决环境给予的生
存问题，是生命本身创造了今天地球上生命的环境。
所以“种性制约机制”是生命几十亿年长期演化过程
形成的抑制变异最重要的机制。虽然很多人用公驴和
母马杂交产生的异种骡子来否定“种性制约机制”的
客观存在，事实上产生再多的不育的杂种和新种，也
不能形成一个“杂种”或“新种”的独立的物种。因
为“种性制约机制”已经用“不育”（灭绝）这另一
种形式，排除了骡种的存在，保证了驴和马种的纯洁
与永恒。可见生命在种性制约下的自繁殖是形成物种
最重要的法则， “种性制约机制”总是要用“不育”
灭绝那些违背一切该种种性的畸变和跨越种间的物种
产生，这是生命最重要的法则！
3、让我们再从生命物种的多样性来讨论“种性制约机
制”。
表面看生物多样性是由生物特色（特性）决定的，
所以自古以来，亚里士多德对物种的分类都是以生物
184的特征为标识。事实上，这种特征就是着重种性的标
识；种性制约的全部意义就在于保持这种种性特征的
无限延续。无数这样具有种性特征的（物）种的个体
的长期存在和延续，就构成了生命（物）种的多样性，
离开了“种性制约机制”就无法保证种属个体的这种
唯一特征的稳定，就没有生命与物种的多样性！同样，
生物个体的多样性也完全是建立在种性相对长期稳定
的基础上，也就是完全建立在“种性制约机制” 基础
上，通过种性制约的过程来完成上帝（大自然）保持
它所创造的全部物种的使命，保护种的存在与演化，
以至永恒！所以“整体生命学”的核心是“种性制约
机制”的整体生命学。这种机制在蛋白质的形成和质
检过程表现的最为突出。
让我们来具体分析一下，2004 年获得诺贝尔化
学奖的以色列科学家赫什科、切哈诺沃和美国科学家
欧文.罗斯发现的“泛素调节的蛋白质降解” ，即“死
亡之吻”。这虽然是从化学理论说明了蛋白质在细胞
内的代谢“死亡”机理，但深层次的意义与机理却在
于从蛋白质层面揭示了生命有机体在细胞内的“种性
制约机制” ；它证明了任何生命个体微生态内环境中
普遍存在着全天候的“种性制约机制”！ 对“死亡之
吻”的研究表明，信息 DNA 合成的蛋白质 30%不合格，
185即不符合种性的需要。所以，必须把这些不合格的蛋
白质贴上“泛素”的标签，送到细胞内的“垃圾处理
厂”被降解——这是细胞内中微子层面的自我淘汰，
是生命“种性制约机制”在细胞内质检的自我完善制
约过程。其目的是淘汰细胞内超越种性的那些构成细
胞的原料蛋白质，即可能危及种性独立和种性延续的
那些不合格的细胞原料，防止用于构造细胞的蛋白质
变异，把它们检出，贴上“泛素”的标签，以待销毁。
这一过程有着严密的组织，是十分巧妙复杂的自组织
种性制约行为——细胞中存在着 E1、E2、E3 三种酶，
其各有自己独特的分工：E1 负责激活泛素分子，E2
负责把泛素分子绑在需要降解的蛋白质上，E3 负责辨
认指定蛋白质的功能，选出需降解的（不合格的）蛋
白质。当 E1 激活泛素之后，泛素分子就被送到 E2 上，
E2 按着 E3 分辨的指令，把泛素分子绑在指定需要降
解的蛋白质上；这样对合成的新蛋白质进行反复不断
的质检，被绑有泛素分子的指定蛋白质达到一定数量
时，就被送往细胞内的一种称为蛋白酶体的结构中—
—“垃圾处理厂”。 处理厂根据绑在指定蛋白质上的
泛素分子标签，决定接受并降解这些劣质蛋白质。蛋
白酶体是一个桶状结构，通常一个人体细胞中含有 3
万个蛋白酶体，通过它的处理蛋白质就被切成由 7 至
1869 个氨基酸组成的短链。这一复杂过程完全是种性制
约机制在细胞内层面的自组织调节过程，它保证了蛋
白质合成的质量，从而保证了细胞在种性制约下的正
常生长发育和自繁殖。
4、在细胞层面这种“死亡之吻”表现得更为普遍。以
人体为例，人体有数十万亿个细胞，有 274 种不同分
工，各自都有按自组织分工聚集的自我识别功能，和
不断自我调节的更新机制，和产生新细胞，取代受损
和衰老细胞的功能；人体不同组织按自己的时间基因
调控细胞凋亡，形成各自的死亡周期。科学家发现不
同组织器官细胞凋亡有不同的周期：小肠 3 天，肝 1
周，骨骼 2 个月，皮肤 15——30 天完成一次更新，指
甲 3-4 个月，头发的一生分几个阶段，生长期 3-7
年……每种细胞的“死亡程序”都有严格的时间周期
和严密的组织分工，人体每一刻都有数百万新细胞取
代旧细胞。虽然目前还没有像搞清蛋白质“死亡之吻”
那样弄清细胞凋亡，调节组织更新的机理，但食性和
种性制约机制是不争的事实；因为任何细胞都来自细
胞，都依规定的酶吸收规定的食物营养，任何组织的
细胞都随干细胞的再生能力产生专能细胞，调控组织
细胞更新，特别是一种 BAX 蛋白质可促进细胞凋亡；
187染色体末端的端粒像“定时器”一样有控制细胞寿命
的功能，限定一个细胞自我复制的次数，细胞每分裂
一次，端粒长度就要缩短一点，缩短到一定程度，细
胞就不在分裂，预示细胞完成了生命过程，便开始死
亡。并严格按着“细胞来自细胞”的法则，精确分工，
自控组织细胞的专属性，构建组织，从细胞层面来达
到控制种性稳定的目的。同时，从“熵”理论看，细
胞必须从食物（特别是葡萄糖）和氧中获得能量“汲
取序” ，进行能量转换，以“负熵为生” ，这样才能
把“序”不连续“跳跃性”地传递下来，保证新细胞
完全符合种性制约的再生，这种种性制约机制下的再
生，在细胞层面就构成了维持有机体生命活动的“序”
基础！
5、事实上，孟德尔的遗传理论已经揭示了“种性制约
机制”机理的来龙去脉。请看孟德尔的遗传因子图解：
下图的特点是孟德尔在十年时间，用纯的（豌豆）
种系进行实验研究，简单地可分 A 的单一性状的种
性在 5-6 代繁衍过程的变化规律。作为规律它应该
适合整个物种的全部性状为单位的动物植物杂交
实验，和所有生命的自然繁殖。即 AA 和 aa 的结合
产生的 Aa 无论是繁殖多少代，它都只能产生 AA、
188189
aa、 Aa；而不能产生 AA、aa、 Aa 以外的种性个
体生命。也就是说孟德尔的“性状”分离定律和自
由组合定律是建立在 AA、和 aa 同一的
AA
aa
PARENTS
种性基础之上的。所
以，自由组合是种性
Aa
F1
HYBRID
制约下的自由组合，
性状分离也是种性制
约下的性状分离；组
●AA
Aa
Aa
aa
F2 HYBRIDS
合与分离不能超越（
豌豆）的种性，组合
与分离只是豌豆性状
的自由组合与分离。F3 HYBRIDS
物种发现与命名最早开始于亚里士多德，主要
是描述该物种区别与其他物种的特征。对物种特征
描述的方法一直延续下来，1735 年卡罗勒斯.林奈
的《自然系统》发明了双名法，把对物种的描述与
物种的名字和特征用属名和种名同时表示。这是对
种性制约形成物种相对恒定的表达。这种稳定与永
恒正是种性制约机制系统集成从蛋白质“死亡之
吻”到染色体（条）数目，从染色体（条）数目到
“细胞来自细胞”（O mnis ceIiuIa e ceIiuIa 鲁
道夫.菲尔绍的名言）；从细胞到生命个体自繁殖
直到物种的整体——这一系列种性制约机制的环
环相扣，是一个从纳米级生命粒子到大质量生命个
体一直总是间断又连续相同的生命机制，这一机制
也总是伴随着有生命的、活的有相同种性特征的有
机整体的生长发育。
达尔文的《物种起源》揭示了同一物种中的
机体相似性和此物种共有的遗传性状有关，这种物
种共有的遗传性状恰恰是种性制约机制集成的产
物。这是最早从生命起源视点对“种性制约机制”
190的论述。无独有偶，与此同时孟德尔用生命统计学
方法发现有性生殖遗传是可以量化的，得出这种种
性性状不会和从另一个亲代得来的相应特征混合，
任何种的个体后代都是其祖先遗传的复合物，而不
是不同种混合或掺合物。这是从生命制集和生命量
化两个层面研究生命科学得出相同的“种性制约机
制”法则的权威表达。
1900 年德弗里斯、柯灵斯、丘歇马克三位
植物学家各自独立又同时发现，并从早期基因学回
答了共同从亲代传到后代过程保持种性不变的机
理（现代生命科学认识的基因 DNA 理论）——事实
上，孟德尔的这种认识其本质是从生物个体繁殖量
化发现了“种性制约机制”的端倪。是对生命个体
自繁殖“细胞来自细胞” 种性不变的的生命统计
数理表达语言的深入探索！
那么如何解释“种性制约机制”与物种演化
理论——各种生物都从一个共同的祖先繁衍而来
呢？这里面共同的祖先不应该单单是具体的一物
种来自一物种，共同的祖先可以从基因的层面去认
识理解。又因为自然选择总是对偶然发生的变化起
作用，可见物种的变化都是偶然的罕见的突变。
1900 年荷兰生物学家德弗里斯首先提出了突变。然
191而，人们早就知道，即使是完全纯种繁殖的后代里，
也只有极少数的个体出现细微的“跳跃式”的变化，
这种变化并不大，是在“种性制约机制”控制下的
微小变化，更重要的是它的不连续性，用薛定谔的
话说“突变是不出现中间形式的”它并不影响种性
的稳定，所以自然情况下并不能产生明显种性变化
的中间变种，它更不影响生命在基因层面的同性演
化。历史证明物种变化往往是偶然性的突然事件，
物种总是突变大规模产生某一新物种，或者突然发
生物种大灭绝，这有寒武大爆发和恐龙大灭绝的生
命历史事件考古为证。这说明物种的产生或灭绝完
全是偶然事件，生命演化并不是缓慢的线性轨迹，
而是螺旋线时断时续（正旋线奇点和负旋线奇点交
替出现）的“跳跃式”演化轨迹，这是“种性制约
机制”长期作用的结果。所以在化石的地质记录中
极其缺少中间物种，或者说根本不存在中间物种，
这也是长期困惑达尔文的难点。那么，如何解释化
石的地质记录中极其缺少中间物种的历史事呢？
这只有用量子理论才能解释清楚，正如薛定
谔阐述的——在两个相邻的能级之间没有中间能
量的事实，去认识生命量子理论，突变实际上是由
于基因分子中的“量子跃迁”所引起的。基因分子
192中的量子在跃迁前后并没有本质的改变，所以根本
不存在没有改变和少许改变之间的中间形式的物
种。种性的跳跃传递是内在隐含着基因“量子跃迁”
的一种自然和客观现实，只有这样才能保证种性的
稳定。所以在种的个体生命，表现出永远是动植物
（微生物）个体的从生到死，再从生到死……从一
种状态转变到另一种状态；用薛定谔的话说“状态
是系统中全部粒子的一种确定的构型。”把它应用
到生命量子力学中，这种任何种的个体生命的不连
续，符合“一种构型转变为另一种构型就是量子跃
迁”的物理学定律；正是一种构型转变为另一种构
型的生命个体的量子跃迁的无限循环，才产生了
“种性制约机制” 在生命“跳跃式”变化过程中，
能永远跨越无数个体的长期稳定。所以生命系统中
的状态和构型从来就是不连续的、跳跃的，又是稳
定、不变的，这也是“种性制约机制”符合量子力
学最巧妙的难点，和基因必须以密码传递服从生命
数理的事实。显然德弗里斯的突变、孟德尔的遗传
理论和达尔文的进化论同样触及到了“种性制约机
制”法则的核心。
6、达尔文根本没有解决人类进化的具体时间和地点，
更没有解决第一批人类的人种组成等许多具体问题与
193难点。比如种性制约机制往往使一个稀有的突变体在
与正常个体交配所产生的种群中完全被“淹没”掉，
这一点当时达尔文已经认识到了。——因为生物种群
无论何时何地，从远古到现今都对得到的资源施加着
压力，这是马尔萨斯生存斗争理论的客观基础，也是
达尔文适者生存理论的客观基础。虽然至今有些科学
家对马尔萨斯的《人口论》仍有不同的认识，甚至把
生存斗争的残酷性说成邪恶理论。然而，事实上生存
斗争的残酷性至今仍困绕着人类，2004 年 12 月 26 日
7 时 58 分 49 秒，在印尼苏门答腊省的亚齐岛突然剧
烈颤抖，瞬间发生一场旷世海啸，海啸席卷了印度洋
沿岸国家，转瞬夺走了 20 多万条生命，几十万人无家
可归，经济损失有几千亿美元。3 个月后，2005 年 3
月 28 日强地震在该地区再一次发生，虽然科学家预报
将有大海啸发生，但没有发生，所以损失较小，可见
大自然的行为并不理会人类的意志，不按人类的意志
行事；发生不发生大海啸，完全不由人类自己决定，
我们人类自身根本改变不了大自然生存斗争的规律。
所以在生存斗争这一点上，整个自然界大生命场内都
是真实的客观存在，它都制约着微生物、植物、动物、
人类的生存，人类不断增加了自己抗灾害的能力，并
不能改变生存斗争的客观规律。事实上，生存斗争同
194样是种性制约机制存在的客观基础。因为食物与性是
生命物存在和繁殖的本能需要和客观基础，种性就是
保证这种（种群食性）本能的延续；离开了食物，任
何生命（物）无法生存，离开了性，生命（物）无法
自繁殖。无法生存和无法繁殖就谈不上种，更谈不上
生存与繁殖，谈不上物种与物种的稳定持久。食物与
性，任何生命对此二者缺一不可；缺一就没有种与种
群，就没有任何生命存在。这就是为什么《整体板块
遗传律》的文字表达要旨是：死亡与灭绝的原因！事
实上，用今天的科学发展高度来认识马尔萨斯生存斗
争的理论的合理内核，正是种性（食物与性）制约机
制用生存斗争语言表达的生命规律，是食与性（种性）
对物种制约的规律，这是最无法辩斥的事实。本质来
说食与性就是种性，因为物种不同特征完全是由生命
种的个体不同食物与不同（性）繁殖方式习惯延衍产
生的；食本能，性本能二元合一就是物种生命（个体）
的本能，这从草食动物和肉食动物的形成和分类最能
说明，这从人（人类）的熟食而区别于其他一切动物
特征的现实更能证明。在《人口论》中马尔萨斯运用
了威力无穷的数学语言，揭示了食（资源）与性（繁
殖数量）不可调和的矛盾，论证了人口按几何级数 2
的 n 次方增长，其增长趋势将每 25 年按 1、2、4、8、
19516、32、64……的顺序迅速增长（性本能的数理增长、
细胞分裂）。而食（物）资源按算数级数 1、2、3、4、
5、6、7、8……增长，其增长十分缓慢，二者很不协
调，形成不可调和的矛盾。马尔萨斯按着这种乘法表
般精确计算得出，人口和食物的比例在 200 年内达到
256/9；在 300 年就将高达 409/13……这种矛盾随时
间推延，远景不容乐观。事实上，马尔萨斯用食（物）
与性（繁殖）本能的矛盾在相互制约中演绎出生命个
体与物种、种间、种群间争夺资源的激烈而恐怖的生
存斗争，正是达尔文自然选择机制的本源。可见达尔
文的自然选择是种性（食物与性本能）制约机制的自
然选择，如果生命无需食物与性，争夺食物与性资源
的斗争就不复存在，也就不存在生存斗争了。
7、我们在《整体板块遗传律》中讨论过食性基因的演
化和累积，认为有机体（以人为例）是通过“食基因”
来“汲取序”。正如薛定谔指出的“一个有机体在它
自身上集中了“序的流束” ，从而避免了向原子混沌
的衰退，从而在合适的环境中“汲取序” ，这种惊人
的天赋似乎用“非周期性固体” ，同染色体分子的存
在有关。”……“就高等动物而言，它们完全以汲取
序而生是人们早就知道的事实。因为被它们作为食物
196的、不同复杂程度的有机体中，物质的状态是极为有
序的。动物在利用这些食物以后，排泄出来的则是大
大降解了的东西。然而不是彻底的降解，因为植物还
能够利用它（当然，对植物来说，太阳光是“负熵”
的最有力的供应者）。”
8、人类农耕有史记载可推到 1-2 万年前，无文字记载
的时间会在数十亿年或更久远。5000-8000 年前已经
有人类永久生活“种植者”的村落，小麦的种植可推
溯到 1.5 万年前的印度、中国。麦克尼什与北京大学
在中国江西两个洞穴和一个湖泊，发现时间在 1.8 万
年前到 1.7 万年前最早出现的野生稻米的花粉和植物
化石，充分证明那时中国长江流域已经开始种植稻米。
以小麦革命与稻米革命为契机的农业革命完成了人类
食性到种性的持久统一。考古学家对 10 个不同人类骨
骼的头骨中骨胶原的分析证明，人们吃的食物中碳和
氮同位素比例不同，导致人们身体组织中食（性）成
分不同；稻米品种与化学成分已在人们的头骨深深打
上了食性印记，它从生命的环境直接加于全部（食物）
各个种的有机体，构成有机体的种性与基因的和谐；
农业革命的食物品种的多样性丰富了（人）有机体内
有机物合理的高等级（熟食）组合，在长期演化中就
197打上了人独有的食性（头骨骨骼）印记，这是种性与
食性互补的化石集录。所以西方学者认为是稻米栽培
支持了 5000 年前中国高度发达的文明！其后的玉米革
命带来了茄科植物、马铃薯、西红柿、豆类等……栽
培的种植园的出现与发展，使人类食品种类与种性稳
定了几万年。今天人类的基因组图谱和这种食性稳定
息息相关，这是因为“作为食物的、不同复杂程度的
有机体中，物质的状态是极为有序的。”历史沿革的
食性与食物极大地丰富了种性，丰富了种性制约机制
的语言！
9、著名的法国生物学家布丰最早提出生物演化三因
素，原理的根据与最重要的原因就是食物——食物的
变化，食物的变化就是食性的变化。本质地说气候变
化的原因是隐含在食物之中的，被使役的原因只是一
种人工选择。为什么说气候变化隐含在食物变化之中
呢？因为人的脏腑运动（微循环）具有与气候和谐的
季节性，在长期的演化中，各个脏腑软性封闭系统内
的脏气和气候季节性变化在同步气（候）相互交流中，
形成的微生态时时随气候季节变化和谐，并形成迎合
季节变化的习惯。所以人体必须吸收季节性食物来适
应这种变化，特别是利用季节性的蔬菜来吸收植物自
198身随季节吸收的天地精微之气。我们从人的食欲也能
深刻地感觉到脏腑的这种需要， “馋”是人体大脑对
季节性食物需要的一种反映，体内脏腑会通过一种内
隐反映随时作出“馋”的反应，把这种信息传递到大
脑产生出一种挑选食物的欲望；我们顺应和执行了这
种指令，吃进了这种季节性蔬菜，相关脏腑就会受到
天地营养精气的滋补而安静下来！人体食性需要得到
了满足，大脑发布“馋”的信息就会自动消除。季节
性是一种天性，植物蔬菜一般是随时间基因控制生长
的季节性生物，它的根、茎、叶、花、果、实存储了
季节特有的营养和精微之气，吃这种季节性蔬菜，就
相当于吃进了随季节变化、天地释放的营养和精微之
气，能很好补充和满足脏腑有机体的需要，保证食性
的周期循环的稳定，为基因的稳定有序和蛋白质功能
的稳定提供了顺应自然的和谐，这也是生命的一种适
宜环境变化的本能，是种性稳定的本能！所以气候变
化是通过吸收有机体食物变化需要达到这种变化的，
布丰的生物演化三因素的实质就是食物的变化，在长
期演化过程不同生物的食（物）性不同，就形成了不
同的种性，不同标致特征的物种，达到食（物）性与
种性的统一！所以任何不会熟食的动物都不能演化成
人类！
19910、具体的说食物基因进入人体是最有秩序的，食品
基因是最为有序的蛋白质复杂构件，任何生物体（动
物遗骸植物根茎叶花果实）内含的基因序并没有破坏。
我们都知道提取洋葱 DNA 链最简单的实验方法，即把
一个大洋葱切碎放入瓷器皿内，再取 10 调羹洗涤液，
加 1 勺盐和 4 升水，搅拌后取这种混合液体，放在隔
水蒸锅文火煮 3 分钟，不断搅拌后高速匀浆 5 分钟，
过滤后滴几滴新鲜菠萝汁和几滴酒精，等片刻，两层
的界面能看到絮状物出现。此时我们只要用一根搅酒
棒挑起絮状物，当它挑出杯子时会立刻塌陷成网状纤
维——这就是洋葱 DNA！让我们把这种实验方法和人
食用洋葱（包括一切食物）的过程稍加对比：洋葱切
碎做熟，入口咀嚼，加酶（消化液），入胃搅拌（胃
蠕动）生热成海，加胃酸和甲烷气相当于菠萝汁和酒
精。如果挑出胃，会立刻塌陷成网状纤维，同样是洋
葱（或某种食物）的 DNA。也就是说，人每天都在食
用不同有机体的 DNA——“食基因” ， “汲取序”来
构建自身的 DNA 结构的“序的流束”。而且食性不仅
仅是食基因的“序”！每一种食（性）都带着地域水
土的属性，它丰富了人体“天地之至数”（一方水土
养一方人），构成了人的种性。因为土地是万物生命
200的本源，所有生物体残骸（动物遗骸植物根茎叶花果
实）全都是这种本源凝晶的精华，汇聚万（食）物精
华，才形成了人食性习惯；（饮食）习惯成自然，自
然是一种演化的力量，这一切和基因的“序” 都要靠
吃（食物）、喝水、呼吸进行同化——这样长期累积
就形成了食性本能，形成了生物种的特征。任何有机
体都有自己食（物）性的特征，这种食性特征在生命
演化过程中，形成整体相对同一（状态构型）集聚的
特征，这就形成了物种。所以达尔文在加拉帕戈斯群
岛看到鸱雀在相隔不远的小岛都不相同的现象，这是
食物吸收地域水土的“天地之至数”产生的变化。事
实上，物种的形成绝对不能离开食性吸收——“汲取
序”的长期演化的惯性习俗；任何食性的改变都能不
同程度地改变有机体“ 内环境”的“序的流束”。康
熙年间，有一个大臣得了很严重的腹泻，御医开了许
多药方均无法治疗。一日康熙皇帝告知大臣吃一些狍
子肉就可治愈；大臣半信半疑按皇帝旨意吃了一次，
腹泻就神奇地治愈了。这一案例深刻地反映了食物对
有机体“汲取序”的至关重要！食性习惯是形成种性
的一种力量（习惯就是力量），食性带着汲取的序就
给种性持久的稳定，就形成了种性制约机制。因为生
存斗争来源于生命对于资源（食物与性）的竞争，
20111、 生存斗争是种性制约机制的另一种表达形式。而
且自然选择是在生存斗争的客观存在中，不同变种对
生存斗争有不同的适应力，自然选择适者生存；更是
不适者死亡的表达——自然对所有的变种都用同一法
则进行选择，不适者选择的终点表达无疑是死亡与灭
绝。任何物种在不能满足其食物与性本能需要时只能
死亡与灭绝。所以“破坏整体板块遗传律的唯一选择
是个体的死亡与种的灭绝。”这就使生物在种性制约
机制下形成的统一体物种，处于一个永远稳定的动态
“跳跃式”演化过程之中。这从生命螺旋线轨迹学也
能得到充分的证明！根据生命螺旋线原理，人口增长
不是正旋线增长，就是负旋线（负）增长；演化历史
证明人口除了生存斗争过程中发生的战争、瘟疫、自
然灾害等……导致的人口减少，如 14 世纪黑死病使
1/2 欧洲人死亡，这并不影响整体生命运动的正旋线
轨迹。从 20 万年前到 21 世纪的今天，人口总是按正
旋线增长，并总是伴随人口大爆炸。据文献记载 20
万年前的文化革命使人口猛然增加到 100 万，这是有
记载的首次人口大爆炸；人类农业革命带来了二次人
口大爆炸，从 500 万增加到 5000 万；随着工业革命人
口在短时间大爆炸，竟然达到 60 亿之多！这不仅证明
202了马尔萨斯人口原理和生存斗争的客观存在，也说明
人口增长总是按着生命螺旋线轨迹演化发展。工业革
命导致人口过渡增长和过渡人口大爆炸；表面看是人
类完成了对生命的征服，然而环境破坏的潜在危机和
新瘟疫灾难迅速出现，产生了这种工业（化）革命的
新生存斗争，新生存斗争并不会让人类乐观。事实上，
人类自身的战争一刻没有停地吞食着人的生命，像今
天的中东、伊拉克……
12、从生命螺旋线轨迹来考察，为什么所有生命个体、
种与种群的生命运动轨迹都可以用生命螺旋线轨迹量
度的原因，就在于自然对所有种与个体无时无处都进
行了选择，让最适应的种与个体生存下来。所以这些
经过严格选择，符合生命数理法则的生命种群，留下
的最适应的种与个体留下的后代最多，但仍然是不连
续的。这就表现为正旋线轨迹。如下图：这种轨迹又
与马尔萨斯生命数理增长的2的n次方几何级数巧合；
这种巧合还出现在细胞分裂的细胞生长过程，它们和
华罗庚优选法的 0.618 吻合，特别是生命繁殖的量往
往与对数螺旋线性质相通。这就是为什么孟德尔在十
年的豌豆试验中，总发现 3：1 生命数理制约着生命遗
203传现象的深层次数理的唯一解的原因——这里面隐瞒
着种性制约机制的数理语言和生命螺旋线轨迹。
然而，突变是不是对种性制约机制的一种挑战
呢？让我们从两种情来讨论：
A、致死性突变。
B、非致死性突变。
对于 A 是种性灭绝的表达，是种性制约机制直接作用，
不适者死亡的必然和自然淘汰的结果。
对于 B 这种非致死性突变（突变）总伴随着遗传
改变的根源，并符合孟德尔揭示的基因分配及重组的
规律。这就制约着突变体形成新种的机率，突变体要
形成新种，只有基因在染色体上标定的位置发生改变
或染色体改变，才能把这种突变遗传下来；也只有这
种改变长期固定形成自繁殖——这需要有自己新标定
的位置的基因和染色体畸变固定的摸式结构，形成有
效的遗传机制，才能谈得上新种的产生，这种机率几
乎不存在。1903 年摩尔根的学生沃尔特.萨东通过果
蝇发现其某种遗传特征的遗传和它的染色体中的一些
细节之间的相关性——基因可能组织在染色体上沿着
一条线的序列中。这在 1911 年育种实验中得到证实。
被控制的特征可以在带状的黑条果蝇染色体上标定位
置。如图：
204当年穆勒开拓性的贡献特别大，是发
现基因线性排列的根据和来源，但是从图中线
性排列的点位与特征相关排列的数理统一看，
却表达了种性特征和染色体标定位置的对应和 谐关
系。即物种特征和染色体上的基因标定密切相关的永
久数理统一，这种统一形成种性制约机制制约，制约
着突变。
穆勒（1890——1967）在 1926 年发现 X 射线可以诱发
突变。在果蝇反复实验中穆勒认识到，在自然条件下
果蝇的突变频率是很小的，几乎是零。穆勒总结说：
“X 射线既可引起基因突变，也可以引起染色体畸变；
用 X 射线诱发的可见突变中，绝大多数为隐性突变，
但也有少数的显性突变；无论是显性突变还是隐性突
变，往往出现致死效应。”
死亡与灭绝这是另一种“种性制约机制”的语言。
事实上，生命有机体的很多点位是免变异（包括突变）
的。比如 ABO 血型。自 1900 年发现 ABO 血型至今，科
学家还没有发现或看到人类中这个点位上出现过任何
变异（突变），这个点位的变异（突变）频率是很小
的，几乎是零。ABO 血型在漫长的演化过程中，极难
发生哪怕极小极小的突变。可见在漫长的自然选择年
代里，种性制约机制总是不声不响地在不同层次、不
205同点位（如染色体上或基因标定位置）起作用，在种
性不可调和的点位绝对实施免变异（性），以保证种
的正常繁殖和延续，保证物种的稳定与永恒！
13、生命起源细菌化石记录的生命 DNA 时代早就从细
菌开始了。英国科学家苏珊.奥尔德里奇在《生命之线
——基因与遗传工程》中强调： “事实上，基因的传
递并没有什么特别，它已经存在几十亿年了。它的应
用潜力来自人类对它的控制，而不是演化的盲目性。”
这一结论是由历史化石记录的细菌得出的。大概在 36
亿年前，生命一开始就被细菌模式所广泛占有。细菌
基因组主要部分无一例外的是核苷酸的排列。也就是
说，细菌（单细胞、真核细胞）、植物、动物共有（用）
基因，几十亿年长期共生、共同演化。比如没有肠道
菌落，人（动物）体就无法消化吸收食物营养。肠道
没有了菌落，人吃一顿饭完全消化需要 50——100 年；
最近中国人类学家发现2001年6月在山东考古得到的
400 多个头骨，均是 5200 年以前的人类遗骨，并从头
骨的孔洞认定 5000 多年前中国已经进行了颅骨手术。
所以 5000 多年前的人（类）肠道没有菌落是不可想象
的。正如莎冈和马格理斯强调说： “所有对地球生命
重要的元素——氧、氮、磷、碳——都由于微生物的
206参与，才能恢复到可用情况……整个生态都依赖微生
物和真菌的分解功能，把死亡的动植物所含的化学养
分，送回到整个生物体系之中。”也就是说：植物、
人和动物的生与死，完全依赖与细菌的共生——从这
种认识来看，要去追朔生命 DNA 的历史，就要把生命
时间的上限最起码放到 36 亿年前，而且微生物同样存
在种性制约。最近科学家研究表明 DNA 从远古存在至
今基本上没有大的改变，或很少改变。从孟德尔的遗
传规律看后代（子代和无数子代）亲缘的关连，已经
发现了基因决定生命遗传的数理（3：1）事实。既然
36 亿年前至今 DNA 模式基本没有改变，共有相同的遗
传密码，这些都构成了生命体从蛋白质到细胞——组
织、个体、种群、物种食与性长期稳定存在的基础，
这就是种性制约机制长期存在的证明和历史渊源。此
外，染色体的数目也构成了种性制约机制至关重要的
一个环节。前面我们谈到骡子力大，却不育，不育导
致骡子不能形成独立的物种。科学家研究发现其原因
主要是公马有 64 个染色体条，母驴有 62 个染色体条，
杂交产生的骡子有 63 个染色体条，不同数目的染色体
条载负的基因根本不同，这就是种性制约机制在基因
到染色体层面的表达语言，对背离种性制约机制产出
的生命个体，别无选择地用不育达到（杂）种的灭绝，
207以捍卫物种的长期存在与永恒。14、所以，历史上人
猿杂交即使成为可能，其结局同样是不育和灭绝，以
此保证物种的纯洁。据最新解密的俄国挡案记载：1929
年 3 月 1 日——1932 年 3 月 20 日曾秘密进行了人猿
杂交的计划，由伊万诺夫实施。他曾去非洲，在取得
当地族人头领的同意下，寻找非洲妇女与猿杂交。但
是，由于非洲妇女拒绝与猿猴（黑猩猩）交配而夭折。
由于伊万诺夫有辱“使命” ，他回俄后被投入监狱，
出狱不到一年就死去了。所以伊万诺夫并没有制造出
人猿杂种。此外，有关沃罗诺夫教授的《给从猿猴身
上向人身上移植性细胞》的文章并组建“猿猴城堡” ，
也有文字记载。在格里马尔迪动物繁殖中心养了 100
头动物，进行人猿杂交实验。传说产生了和“雪人”
类似的“怪物” ，身高 2 米，力大无穷。然而，关键
仍然是不育和灭绝！1927 年白俄罗斯报纸《俄国日报》
刊登了这则消息，曾轰动一时。对于历史上俄国人通
过人猿杂交到底有没有产生了人猿杂种，虽然报道不
一，却很难找到事实证明，即使有人猿杂种，不育导
致灭绝是确定的事实。与此同时，各国科学家也都在
进行着种间（异种）移植。早期异种移植从黑猩猩的
肾移植到人体，一个肾脏只存活了 9 个月。20 世纪 80
年代开始转基因技术，科学家约翰.华沃尔克和戴维.
208怀特用猪的心脏移植发现血液循环通过猪的心脏几分
钟内，就被一种超急性排斥的机制损毁。实验进一步
发现： “这种排斥机制是人体免疫系统的抗体激活了
一组能形成补体系统的蛋白质，这些蛋白质一起对外
源器官发动凶猛的进攻，它们在其上打孔，调动血液
凝固剂切断其血液供应，并且使它变成一团发黑的组
织。”……这段人猿杂交和异种移植的历史，已经为
我们 21 世纪的“人兽混合生命种制造”的“假想试验”
提供了前景“蓝图”。再从蛋白质外的染色体来说，
人有 46 个染色体条，猿有 48 个染色体条，人猿杂交
即使可能，产生的杂种也只能是有 47 个染色体条的
“杂种”。按骡子的现实存在看，人猿杂交的“杂种”
既使产生，不育和灭绝是可以肯定的。可见种性制约
机制永远会用死亡与灭绝（杂种不育）的方式，消除
一切背离该种种性的任何生命个体的种间畸变。这就
是种性制约机制最典型的真实历史案例。
14、2005 年 3 月 20 日美国普度大学病理科学家博卢
伊特等人已经发现，植物的基因有一种自我更正机制。
它能对子代错误的变异用祖父或曾祖父遗传的（种性
制约机制）改正过来。博卢伊特发现有时候能够从曾
祖辈的基因库中选择健康的基因物质，修改从父母辈
209那里直接遗传到的有缺陷的突变基因。可见校正缺陷
基因是种性固有的一种种性本能，是种性制约机制利
用隔代遗传实现自我更正的一种功能，它可有效改变
遗传过程中偏离远祖种性遗传缺陷的错误，可追溯保
持曾祖辈的正常基因，以便随时按时间基因调控，更
改父辈遗传过程所犯的错误和产生的突变。这种自我
更正机制，把违反正常种性的错误通过隔代遗传改正
过来，这是种性制约机制的一种（重复）表现形式。
在《整体板块遗传律》中，我们把隔代遗传看作整体
板块遗传的间隔遗传的模式，这是古老的隔代基因通
过时间基因的调控，再现转录出原始种性性状对应基
因片段完整的表达过程。这种表达本身就是用原始祖
先的基因周期性规范子代基因的遗传演化，是种性制
约通过时间（基因）周期运动，调控纯洁种性的过程。
美国普度大学病理科学家博卢伊特等人已经发现的植
物基因有自我更正机制，完全说明间隔遗传包括隔代
遗传的机理，在于生命有一种随时周期性自我更正基
因缺陷与错误的机理，来保证种性制约机制在相间隔
的几代遗传中，改变那些背离种性的性状基因组谱的
秘密。这也充分证明了间隔遗传的存在，有利于种性
制约机制周期性地检查和修正生命基因排序，有效地
保证后代种性本质的纯洁。
21015、周期性间隔遗传（包括隔代遗传）的自我更正机
理，也能从重复性基因“回文”结构得到深入的理解。
早期表面观察Y染色体的5900万碱基中有半数排列混
乱无序，且几乎不含功能基因。最近科学家才认识到
Y 染色体包含大量重复基因，这些重复基因以“回文”
结构排列有序，并有修改基因突变的作用。它们大多
数位于 8 个“回文”结构中，这些“回文”结构含有
300 万个碱基，其中包括控制睾丸生育及功能的大部
分基因。科学家发现正是这些“回文”结构，弥补了
Y 染色体缺乏配对“伴侣”的事实， “回文”也是弥
补 Y 染色体孤独一条的结构特点。“回文”结构可通
过内部的基因交换，对变异基因进行修复。科学家确
定人类演化以前至少存在 6 个“回文”结构，且早在
500 多万年以前就出现了，并指出“回文”结构两头
的基因交换是保证 Y 染色体基因稳定的一个重要原因
和机理。
“回文”是一种生命数理重复的语言。作为人类
语言文字符号最早出现在古希腊。18 世纪末法国军官
布鲁萨德在埃及尼罗河下游废墟发现了一块黑色玄武
岩石板，即著名的黑色罗塞塔碑石，上刻有神秘的图
文，就有“回文”的应用。它是作为人类早期密码学
中的一种最神秘的藏密语言。密码最早在公元前一世
211纪已经产生并应用，据说恺撒大帝曾用过极简单的代
换式密码，每个字母都由其后的第三个字母代替，即
恺撒密码（Athbash）。重复是一种加密的手段与方法。
重复在密码文字中，从一例到另一例之间的密码（文）
字母数是密钥字母的倍数。如密码之数位经常重复，
就能从重复分析计算出密钥词的长度，和计算所运用
的密码字母的数目，经过频率分析解析出明文字母来
进行破译。“回文”只是密码字母重复的数理变换，
最早的“图灵”计算机用的霍奇斯“回文式”检验语
言，使计算机能够对第一个符号与最后一个符号进行
比较，第二个符号与倒数第二个符号进行比较，以此
类推，可见回文的本质仍然是有规律不同频率的重复。
从远古森林的冷衫条的纹理表现的螺旋线纹看，实际
上也是一种重复，它和生命的基本单位“细胞来自细
胞”的本质是三维重复，比细胞更小的单位蛋白质、
氨基酸也是螺旋结构。像“α螺旋”——20 世纪 30
年代，加利福尼亚理工学院的林纳斯.鲍林提出了“α
螺旋”是氨基酸结构的关键特征。鲍林认为：它本身
的复制品相连接的不对称图形，形成从头到脚都有相
同角度的螺旋。即螺旋是氨基酸可能在其中自组织的
最简单结构。现在已经了解到，染色体最小单位是核
小体，它由四种组蛋白 H2a、H2b、r13、H1 各两个分
212子，共 8 个分子组成一个直径为 10 纳米的圆珠，DNA
在圆珠外围绕了 13/4 周。还有组蛋白 H1 存在于圆珠
附近的 DNA 链上，这就是核小体的结构。许许多多核
小体连成串，形成一条以 DNA 为骨架的染色体细丝。
关键是这样的细丝要经过四次螺旋化，从直径 10 纳米
的一级结构纤丝到 30 纳米的二级结构螺旋体，再到三
级结构直径为 400 纳米的超螺旋体。多次螺旋最后才
成为显微镜下可看见的染色体。这样无数螺旋结构的
核小体组成的 DNA——染色体必须以复合的生命螺旋
线为有机体的生命轨迹。事实上，就人体（动物）而
论，从内到外，每一个人的生理构造都广泛分布无数
重复的结构：人的左右眼、左右鼻（孔）、左右耳、
左右上肢、左右手、左右腿、左右脚和胸腔内的左右
肺、左右肾、左右肝等……人体完全处于一种生理构
造重复状态的和谐。也许有人说这是对称，是左右两
边一一对应关系，但本质看左右两边的一一对应完全
建立在相对相等重复之上；基因密码更是生命信息自
然重复形成的生命遗传语言：三个碱基决定一个氨基
酸，碱基只有 A、T、G、C、（U= T= A）；A 与 T、G
与 C 又相互对应、互补；它们服从于 3：1 生命数理，
这就决定了 DNA 链的重复性，这一切又都统一在螺旋
线性重复之中，特别是不规则的重复性在螺旋线结构
213的统一，才构成了生命性状的多样性与复杂性；可以
说生命最重要的语言就是重复！生命最重要的轨迹就
是正旋线，重复与螺旋线轨迹是生命和谐的灵魂！
15、科学家已经发现了 DNA 上的密码顺序的不连续性
重复与间隔。发现“不连续的结构基因” 、 “跳跃基
因” 、 “重叠基因”……不同节奏的重复就构成了基
因的不同频率，不同频率的基因和不规则的基因重复
构成了生命遗传信息的千变万化的复杂性和多样性—
—这种复杂性与千变万化才形成了生物个体的复杂多
样性与可区别的生命个性。目前最流行的人体识别高
科技 DNA 指纹识别，就是利用重复基因片段载有人体
自身信息功能，即人们的身份都载入自身的基因组中
的事实。使用索塞印迹分析法来建立以个人 DNA 为基
础的身份识别。即在人类 DNA 与众不同的分子特征中，
外显子、内显子、转座子和其他大小片段中，以重复
特征最为突出。DNA 片段上有相同的一小片段，通常
在 20 个碱基长，往往重复出现；但每个人又都不相同。
列斯特大学的科学家亚历克.杰弗里惊喜地发现，某个
人的迷你随体的长度随人而异。这种迷你随体散布于
基因组具有随体（重复）可变性，就能显现不同人的
迷你随体型式并把它作为一种指纹进行有意义的识
214别。这就是重复在 DNA 大小片段中存在规律的应用。
这种不同层面、规则与不规则的重复，统一于生命螺
旋线的数理重复之中，形成了有机体多层次种性制约
机制的高度统一性和数理性稳定。这样才能有效保证
所有生命性状的稳定，使如此复杂千变万化的基因在
有机体生长发育和遗传过程中，确能永远保持物种的
长期稳定与和谐，保证生命在长久性的，复杂运动过
程中形成统一稳定的整体！
16、种性制约机制是保证遗传稳定的唯一法则，它是
相当复杂的跨越时空的量子二元机制。量子二元机制
首先表现在符合生命数理的纠缠和多层次的种性制
约，允许种性遗传和种性制约下的变异；当遗传变异
超出这种种性制约机制时，便以个体的死亡和种的灭
绝来实现种性的稳定和持久，其突出的的表达形式是
个体的不育——量子级的生命数理制约、不育、死亡
与灭绝是生命种性制约机制法则；是普遍二重性跨越
时空的过程，它产生种的个体状态不连续性的系统集
成的持久构型和生命永久性的种性特点。
对于生命种的“持久性和永久性”埃尔温.薛定谔提出
了十分精辟的论述，他说：
215“即基因结构似乎只包含比较少的数量的原子（1000
的数量级，可以还更少）然而它却表现出最有规律，
最守法的活动——并有如此的持久性和永久性，这就
是一种奇迹。”——《生命是什么？》
为什么？为什么生命、物种、生命个体、细胞、基因
都有如此稳定的“持久性和永久性”呢？
事实上，著名物理学家薛定谔已经从物理学定律与生
物学的广义相关理论回答了这个问题。薛定谔说： “一
个有机体为了使它的内在生命以及它同外部世界的相
互作用，都能为精确的定律所描述，它必须有一个相
当大的结构。”结构是什么呢？结构就是整体，结构
就是系统，结构就是集成！今天我们已经认识到：人
体的细胞有 300 万亿，每个细胞核上有 23×2 条染色
体；每条染色体上有 3.5 万基因，人体的基因数目无
疑是一个天文数字的巨大结构（3.5 万×３００万亿
×23×2……），如果以核小体计算就更是无穷大。人
体的基因又只是细胞中染色体上的遗传因子；如果按
原子来认识人体的结构（当时每个基因按 1000 的数量
级计算，现在是 1000 的三、四个数量级），我们也很
难准确算出人体由多少原子组成。用薛定谔以黄色光
波长的微粒来直观比喻原子的大小，它的体积中含有
几十亿个原子，用黄色光波长的微粒与人体原子数量
216相比较，人体的原子数量就和地球比沙粒一样——无
穷大比无穷小，真是无法数清；用量子生物学来认识：
“状态是系统中全部粒子的一种确定的构型。”任何
有机体从氨基酸到蛋白质都是一个巨大的聚合体状态
（一种确定的构型）， “于是我们得到的结论是，一
个有机体和它经历的全部生物学相关过程，必须具有
极多的“多原子”结构．必须防止偶然的： “单原子”
事件起到重大的作用。”所以薛定谔用歌德的诗来表
达生命“持久性和永久性”的美德： “存在是永恒的；
因为有许多法则保护了生命的宝藏；而宇宙从这些宝
藏中汲取了美。”可见生命隐匿着巨大的结构，才能
有遗传学定律、基因密码、互补法则……这些定律与
自然法则相互吻合，而这些生命定律只仅仅是“整体
生命学”的一个状态，（一种确定的构型）的一小部
分规律的表达。对生命科学的研究，西方更多的是实
验科学，这样往往会抛开生命的整体！整体生命学是
对有机体巨大结构系统存在现实的认知；人类为什么
不把地球剖开来研究呢？当我们局部地把生命分割实
验时，有机体早已经死亡，很多现象都是死亡的、静
止的，这和剖开地球（毁灭地球）来研究的道理是一
样的。所以阿尔弗雷德.韦格纳在研究海陆变迁的过程
中，提出地质学可以在野外研究，也可以在图书馆里
217研究；可以从一地的实际考察研究，也可以从积累的
证据进行整体的研究。韦格纳在德国一个外省的大学
里进行广泛的查阅文献研究发现，南北大陆一定曾经
联结成一片超大陆，并命名“泛大陆”。并写成《大
陆与海洋起源》划时代巨著；并找到了所有这些大陆
曾是统一的证据，这为我们整体地研究生命提供了最
好的借鉴与方法！中国有 5000 年整体生命学的传统和
思维体系，近 400 年西方通过实验科学对生命运动的
研究发现了许多规律，积累了许多详实的文献。
17、分子生物学并不能解决人类疾病与健康的诸多矛
盾，更无法治愈瘟疫癌症、HIV、SRAR、疯牛病、禽流
感……美国国家科学院院士刘易斯.托马斯在《医学的
历史教训》 中总结说： “按着惯例现代医学的开端被
定在 20 世纪 30 年代中期，以磺胺类药物和青霉素进
入药典为标志，人们还通常把医疗实践中的革命性力
量归因于这些事件。在那个时候事情看上去就是这样。
医学被翻了个个儿，有的给革命化了。从前的许许多
多不治之症，在那时找到疗法了。已经有了治愈的良
方……几乎一夜之间，柳暗花明；一些最常见，最要
命的人类疾病——大叶肺炎、脑膜炎、伤寒、结核病、
各种类型的败血病，都可能用抗生素立时治愈了。”
218然而，50 年后“超级病毒”的出现，打破了现代医学
骄傲的神话。英国《每日电讯报》在 2005 年 3 月 3
日就报道说，一批有世界影响的科学家预测 2010 年人
类所研制的所有抗生素都将无法对付“超级病毒”—
—MRSA（耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的缩写）已击败
万古霉素。以卡森《寂静的春天》为标志对科学的反
思和《未来的灾难》的预言，已经为艾滋病等疾病在
全世界的无度肆虐所证明。2004 年本来已经远离人们
的小儿麻痹症又冲破了免疫“糖丸”的抑制，在非洲
部分地区死灰复燃。肺结核“白色瘟疫”也在世界范
围重新大规模传播，已经成为当今中国传染病的第一
大杀手；2004 年南亚禽流感至今没有完全消声灭迹，
2005 年马尔堡出血热到 4 月 17 日据报告已有 255 人
感染，233 人死亡，死亡率达 91%以上，尚无治疗药物
疫苗和方法……对于这些症结与教训，托马斯总结说：
“我相信，迄今为止的纪录倾向于支持这一预感。
我所知道的最为复杂的，牵涉到多细胞、多组织、而
且多器官的疾病，是三期梅毒，慢性结核病，还有顽
固性贫血。在每一种情况中，至少有五个主要器官和
组织卷了进去，而且每一器官，每一组织似乎都受到
许多环境因素的影响。在对之进行科学评估之前，每
219一种都被认为是我们现在所说的 “多因素”疾病；它
们过于复杂，不允许人们考虑任何一单个发病机制。”
这就是美国著名医学家以一生临床经验对整体疾病与
死亡整体性存在状态的描述与经验教训的总结。这就
是整体生命学诞生的理论契机！
生命是一个巨大的结构，生命是一个完整的系统，生
命是一种奇妙的无数“聚合体”的有序集成，生命是
一个整体！对此，美国国家科学院院士刘易斯.托马斯
发出了精诚的呼颠，他说：
“但我可以想见我们的一个错处，这错处还在蚕食侵
蚀着我们：我们关于自己知之甚少。关于我们如何运
作，占什么位置，最要紧的是关于我们扎根于其中作
为工作部件的这个巨大的、不可思议的生命系统，我
们是无知的。我们并不了解自然，一点都不了解。”
18、20 世纪末诞生的“系统生物学”欠缺整体性仍然
是在细胞生物学的框架内，主要是对细胞功能系统的
研究。目的仍然是希望了解完整的基因组或蛋白质组
的活动之后，就可以完全认识生命的奥秘。这仍然是
一相情愿！事实上，就种性制约机制而论，它完全是
存在并制约生命各个层次（原子、碱基、氨基酸、蛋
白质、基因、细胞、组织……），各个（生物）能量
220级、各种大小不同物量尺度（埃到米），以独特的同
时性统一生命四要素（时间、空间、活生物体、自繁
殖）于一个整体之中的机制，形成永恒的生命整体状
态的规律。
让我们再从薛定谔的《生命是什么？》这本书
来讨论“整体生命学”的理论起源！
《生命是什么？》是 1943 年以来广为传播，影响
深远的一本划时代科学理论巨著，历史已经把它看成
分子生物学的开端，它直接引导产出了基因双螺旋的
DNA 革命，并在半个世纪时间里，发展成基因组学和
基因工程的生命大科学。然而，我们仔细研究《生命
是什么？》就不难发现，薛定谔论述的生命科学理论
核心竟然是“整体生命学”理论的本源……
为什么《生命是什么？》是“整体生命学”理论
的本源呢？因为 2000 年来，只有科学家薛定谔首次给
生命（而不是生物）下了整体性完整的定义。认为生
命最重要的特征是：生命物有别与其他任何物质长期
占有时间和空间的“活”性。薛定谔说： “生命的特
征是什么？一块物质什么时候可以认为是活的呢？答
案是当它继续在“做某些事情” 、运动、和环境交换
物质等等的时候，而且期望它比一块无生命物质在类
似情况下， “保持下去”的时间要长得多。”生命之
221所以比其他任何物质的时间要长得多，就在于“活”！
“活”生物体是生命四要素之首，而生命的活性又由
信息（时间要素）、遗传密码、大分子——非周期固
体（空间要素）作为遗传物质 DNA 的模型，所以它符
合生命量子力学的“量子跃迁”所带来的不连续遗传
的稳定持久，在这一过程中生命总是“以负熵为生” ，
从环境中抽取“序”来维持系统的组织概念，形成可
遗传的整体状态或构型；这就从时间、空间、活生物
体、自繁殖四生命要素的不同层次回答了生命是什么！
总结来说生命是一种活的状态、一种活的持久构型的
整体。时间长短的范畴决定生命持久性；空间大小的
微型（量子生命因子）决定了生命与分子运动基础，
而状态与构型还存在功能、动力（熵）、结构……许
多更深层次的系统性大的整体构型——这就是薛定谔
的“整体生命学”大科学概念！
19、20 世纪后 50 年，科学家在薛定谔量子生命理论
的指导下，由沃森和克里克实现了 DNA 双螺旋结构模
型的突破，在大分子——非周期固体、遗传密码、遗
传工程诸方面成绩卓著，完成了从分子生物学到基因
信息学、基因组学——蛋白质组学跨越式突飞猛进，
建树巨丰！然而，以基因组学为核心的分子生物学和
222基因信息学无论怎样发展它只是作为扩大信息容量的
信息库，并不能对控制生命功能和解决具体的疾病医
疗的问题。因为它偏离了薛定谔“活”生命整体的理
论核心。正如 1991 年 8 月 8 日罗杰.彭罗斯在《生命
是什么？》再版前言中所忠告并提醒的那样，说： “正
如许多对人类思维有影响的著作一样，它提出了一系
列一旦被掌握，其真实性就显而易见的论点；然而令
人不安的是这些观点至今仍被大部分人所忽视，虽然
他们本应该对此有更深入的了解。”是的！至今我们
人类忽视了薛定谔提出达到整体生命学概念，忽视了
除基因理论外的所有制约生命的法则、机理、状态、
结构、功能、负熵、机制、构型……当年薛定谔希望
我们“试图把所有已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整
体。”这正是《生命是什么？》的旨要！所以我们说
薛定谔才是开创“整体生命学”的科学巨人、大师、
是“整体生命学”的开拓者；薛定谔已经从时间、空
间、活生物体、自繁殖——四要素同时性的生命现象
说明了什么是生命。也可以说《生命是什么？》是“整
体生命学”的《圣经》！
20、 “整体生命学”是 21 世纪大科学到来，人们开始
用整体论和系统的观点理解生命运动，这是早就该来
的一种趋势，和必然出现的世界性大潮流。因为生命
223224
科学的复杂性与整体性不是经典实验生物学、分子生
物学、基因组与蛋白质组学能够完全说明白的。只有
借鉴《生命是什么？》，去创立有中国特色的“整体
生命学”才能完成此历史重任！这是中华民族伟大复
兴的需要，是中国 5000 年文明的“整体论”史观发展
的必然历史大趋势。
“整体生命学”这是当今世界大趋势，这是当今
世界大潮流！这是世界生命科学在“人类可持续生存”
发展的急转弯，必须产生的大科学！
第十一章 生命生态熵的由来
一
生态熵缘于宇宙大爆炸原力
古希腊科学巨擘柏拉图说， “地球是一个巨大的活生
物体”并得到 3000 年后科学家拉夫罗夫“盖亚假说”的科
学实验证明；以此类推宇宙地球、行星万物星系都是有生命
的。
宇宙始于一个“奇点”大“爆炸” ，爆炸需要超巨级
能量才能在一个奇点产生大爆炸，这就是宇宙大爆炸原力；
鉴于宇宙的生命属性，宇宙大爆炸的力在一种大爆炸生命属
性的“膨胀”就形成了“生态熵” 、这有霍金宇宙大爆炸理
论证明：
霍金说： “宇宙大爆炸核心的巨大神秘之处在于，解释不可思议的巨大的、拥有空间和能量的整个宇宙如何能无
中生有。其秘密在于我们的宇宙最奇怪的一个事实。物理定
律要求存在某种叫作‘负能量’的东西。”——生态熵缘于
宇宙大爆炸原力！
霍金继续解释：【大爆炸产生了大量的正能量，它同
时也产生同样多的负能量。通过这种方式，正的和负的加起
来总是为零。这是自然的另一个定律。
那么今天这些负能量在哪里呢？它在我们宇宙食谱
中的第三种成分中：它在空间中。这可能听起来很奇怪，但
根据引力和运动的自然定律——科学中最古老的那些定律
——空间本身就是一个巨大的负能量仓库，足以确保一切加
起来为零。】——霍金《十问沉思录》
结论：生态熵缘于宇宙大爆炸原力！霍金的“一个巨
大的负能量仓库”这就是“生态熵宇大爆炸原力”的由来；
同样是薛定谔“生命以负熵为生”的本源！
二 奇点的由来
啊！奇点！宇宙大爆炸最神奇的一个时空奇点！
“奇点的由来”霍金是这样说：
【无限密度的单一的点，一个时空奇点。爱因斯坦的广
义相对论在这一点崩溃了。因此，它不能用来预测宇宙以何
种方式开始。遗留下的宇宙起源的问题显然超出了科学范
围。
2251965 年 10 月，在我得到第一个奇点结果的几个月后，
人们获得了宇宙有一个非常致密的开端的观察证据，那是在
整个太空发现了微弱的微波背景。这些微波与你的微波炉中
的相同，但功率却低得多。它们只会把你的比萨加热到零下
270.4 摄氏度，对于解冻比萨没什么用，更不用说烹饪了。
你实际上可以亲自观察到这些微波。那些记得模拟信号电视
的人几乎肯定看过这些微波。如果你曾经把电视机调到一个
空的频道，你在屏幕上看到的雪花的百分之几就是由这个微
波背景引起的。对这个背景唯一合理的解释是，它是由早期
非常热和密集的状态遗留下的辐射。随着宇宙膨胀，辐射会
冷却，直到它变成我们今天观察到的微弱残余。
我和其他许多人都不喜欢宇宙始于一个奇点的思想。爱
因斯坦广义相对论在大爆炸附近崩溃的原因在于它是所谓
的经典理论。也就是说，它隐含地假设从常识中看似显而易
见的事，即每个粒子都具有明确定义的位置和明确定义的速
度。在这种所谓的经典理论中，如果知道宇宙中所有粒子在
某时刻的位置和速度，就可以计算出它们在过去或将来的任
何其他时刻的值。然而，在 20 世纪初，科学家们发现，他
们无法准确计算出在非常短的距离会发生什么。这不仅仅是
他们需要更好的理论。在自然中似乎存在一定程度的随机性
或者不确定性，无论我们的理论有多好，都无法将它们移除。
它可以被概括为德国科学家沃纳·海森伯在 1927 年提出的
226不确定性原理。人们不能准确地同时预测一个粒子的位置和
速度。你把位置预测得越准确，你能预测的速度就越不准确，
反之亦然。】
三 宇宙基因密码在“奇点”已经存在宇宙生命量子属
性
“牛顿给了我们答案。霍金给了我们问题。而霍金的问
题本身将继续在几十年间产生突破。当我们最终掌握量子引
力定律并完全理解宇宙的诞生时，这可能主要归功于站在霍
金的肩膀上。”—— 基普·S.索恩
只有两种类型的波可以穿越宇宙，为我们提供有关遥远
事物的信息：电磁波（包括光线、X 射线、伽马射线、微波、
射电波……）和引力波。电磁波由以光速传播的振荡电力和
磁力组成。它们撞击带电粒子，例如无线电或电视天线中的
电子，它们来回摇动粒子，在粒子中卸下波携带的信息。然
后该信息可被放大并馈送到扬声器或电视屏幕以供人们理
解——这是人类唯一和遥远宇宙认识和信息沟通无形渠道。
2014 年 3 月 17 日美国物理学家宣布，首次发现了宇宙
原初引力波存在的直接证据。
美国哈佛-史密森天体物理学中心等机构物理学家利用
架设在南极的 BICEP2 望远镜，观测宇宙大爆炸的“余烬”
—微波背景辐射。微波背景辐射是由弥漫在宇宙空间中的微
波背景光子形成的，计算表明，原初引力波作用到微波背景
227228
光子，会产生一种叫做 B 模式的特殊偏振模式，其他形式的
扰动，都产生不了这种 B 模式偏振，因此 B 模式偏振成为原
初引力波的“独特印记”。观测到 B 模式偏振即意味着引力
波的存在。
2016 年年初，美国激光干涉引力波天文台（LIGO）和欧
洲引力波天文台（VIRGO）的科学家联合宣布，他们探测到
了两个约为 30 倍太阳质量的黑洞在 13 亿年前的并合产生的
引力波，这一发现被称为“世纪发现”。
事实上，宇宙的演化完全由科学定律所决定。这就彻底
解决了从牛顿时代开始就困扰人类的第一推动问题。在无边
界宇宙学的框架中可以研究宇宙的暴胀、结构、各向同性、
旋转、维数、时间箭头、太初黑洞和太初引力波——最终他
们将开始相互吸引，并将在一次大挤压中聚集在一起。这将
是宇宙历史在空间时间中的终结。
四
宇宙诞生后约 1 秒时各处的温度约为 100 亿度符
合“轻元素丰度”
证实炽热高密度宇宙起源理论的证据。只要知道今天热
辐射的温度，由热大爆炸理论很容易计算出宇宙诞生后约 1
秒时各处的温度约为 100 亿度，这对现有的原子核的合成来
说也是太高了。那时物质必定被撕裂成最基本的成分，形成
一锅夸克胶子汤，诸如质子、中子和电子。但是，随着这锅
汤变冷，核反应就可能出现了。229
采用大爆炸模型可以计算氦-4、氦-3、氘和锂-7 等轻元
素相对普通氢元素在宇宙中所占含量的比例。所有这些轻元
素的丰度都取决于一个参数，即早期宇宙中光子与重子的比
例，而这个参数的计算与微波背景辐射涨落的具体细节无
关。大爆炸理论所推测的轻元素比例（这里是元素的总质量
之比而非数量之比）大约为：氦-4/氢=0.25，氘/氢=10^-3，
氦-3/氢=10^-4，锂-7/氢=10^-7——近似 1/3……
实际测量到的各种轻元素丰度和从光子重子比例推算
出的理论值加以比较，可以发现它们是粗略符合的。其中理
论值和测量值符合最好的是氘元素，氦-4 的理论值和测量值
接近但仍有差别，锂-7 则是差了两倍，对于后两种元素的测
算存在着较大的系统随机误差。尽管如此，大爆炸核合成理
论所预言的轻元素丰度与实际观测可以认为是基本符合，这
是对大爆炸理论的强有力支持。到目前为止，还没有其它理
论能够很好地解释并给出这些轻元素的相对丰度。
五
宇宙生命加速“扩张”与“死亡”
珀尔马特、里斯和施密特的研究对象，是一些大质量恒
星在演化后期伴随星核与星壳分离出现的一种现象，即超级
规模大爆炸。质量相当于太阳的 8 至 25 倍的恒星以超新星
爆发方式结束“生命” ，而恒星外侧气体包则高速抛离，所
显现的绝对光度可超过太阳光度 100 亿倍。分析特定类型的
超新星爆发，珀尔马特、里斯和施密特所属的研究小组发现，超过 50 颗超新星所显现的光度比先前预期暗淡。对这一结
果的解释，是宇宙正在加速扩张。这个发现，被瑞典皇家科
学院称为“震动了宇宙学的基础”——为此索尔·珀尔马特
和亚当·里斯以及持有美国和澳大利亚双重国籍的布赖
恩·施密特获得 2011 年度诺贝尔物理学奖。
六 宇宙大爆炸普朗克时间（秒）与能量年轮刻度①
在 138 亿年的一个奇点，一刹那发生大爆炸；大爆炸后
10-43 秒（普朗克时间）：约 1032 度，宇宙从量子涨落背景
出现，这个阶段称为普朗克时间。
此前，宇宙的密度可能超过每立方厘米 1094 克，超过
质子密度 1078 倍，物理学上所有的力都是一种。（超对称）
在这个阶段，宇宙已经冷却到引力可以分离出来，开始独立
存在，存在传递引力相互作用的引力子。宇宙中的其他力
（强、弱相互作用和电磁相互作用）仍为一体；
大爆炸后 10-35 秒：约 1027 度，暴涨期（第一推动），
引力已分离，夸克、玻色子、轻子形成。此阶段宇宙已经冷
却到强相互作用可以分离出来，而弱相互作用及电磁相互作
用仍然统一于所谓电弱相互作用。
宇宙开始发生暴涨，暴涨仅持续了 10-33 秒，在此瞬间，
宇宙经历了 100 次加倍（2100），得到的尺度是先前尺度的
1030 倍（暴涨的是宇宙本身，即空间与时间本身，并不违反
光速藩篱）。暴涨前宇宙还在光子的相互联系范围内，可以
230平滑掉所有粗糙的点，暴涨停止时，今天所探测的东西已经
在各自小区域稳定下来，而这被称为暴涨理论。
大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，粒子期，质子和中子
及其反粒子形成，玻色子、中微子、电子、夸克以及胶子稳
定下来。
宇宙变得足够冷，电弱相互作用分解为电磁相互作用和
弱相互作用。轻子家族（电子、中微子以及相应的反粒子）
需要等宇宙继续冷却 10-4 秒才能从与其他粒子的平衡相中
分离出来。其中中微子一旦从物质中退耦，将自由穿越空间，
原则上可以探测到这些原初中微子。——摘自网络
七 宇宙大爆炸普朗克时间（秒）与能量年轮刻度②
大爆炸后 0.01 秒：约 1000 亿度，光子、电子、中微子
为主，质子中子仅占 10 亿分之一，热平衡态，体系急剧膨
胀，温度和密度不断下降。
大爆炸后 0.1 秒后：约 300 亿度，中子质子比从 1.0 下
降到 0.61。
大爆炸后 1 秒后：约 100 亿度，中微子向外逃逸，正负
电子湮没反应出现，核力尚不足束缚中子和质子。
大爆炸后 10 秒后：约 30 亿度，核时期，氢、氦类稳定
原子核（化学元素）形成。当宇宙冷却到 109 开尔文以下（约
100 秒后），粒子转变不可能发生了。核合成计算指出，重
子密度仅占拓扑平宇宙所需物质的 2%~5%，强烈暗示了其他
231物质能量的形式（非重子暗物质和暗能量）充满了宇宙 。
大爆炸后 35 分钟后：约 3 亿度，原初核合成过程停止，
尚不能形成中性原子。
大爆炸后 1011 秒（104 年），温度约为 105 开尔文，物
质期。在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形式。随着宇宙
膨胀，电磁辐射的波长被拉长，相应光子能量也跟着减小。
辐射能量密度与尺度（R）和体积（4πR3/3）的乘积成反比
例减小，即安 1/R4 减小，而物质的能量密度只是简单地与
体积成 1/R3 反比例减小。一万年后，物质密度追上辐射密
度且超越它，从那时起，宇宙和它的动力学开始为物质所主
导。
大爆炸后 30 万年后：约 3000 度，化学结合作用使中性
原子形成，宇宙主要成分为气态物质，并逐步在自引力作用
下凝聚成密度较高的气体云块，直至恒星和恒星系统。
量子真空在暴涨期达到全盛，之后便以暗能量的形式弥
漫于全宇宙，且随着物质和辐射密度迅速减小，暗能量越来
越明显。暗能量可能占据宇宙总能量密度的 2/3 ，从而推动
了宇宙加速膨胀。
2021 年 6 月 1 日，欧洲科学家团队利用大型强子对撞机
（LHC），揭示了宇宙大爆炸第一个 0.000001 秒内发生的新
细节，即第一个微秒内一种特殊的等离子体发生了什么，这
种等离子体不但是宇宙有史以来的“第一种物质” ，其相关
232233
细节还为我们今天所知的宇宙演变提供了一块重要“拼图”。
——摘自网络
第十二章 揭开宇宙大爆炸基因密码原理在行星太阳系普遍
性遗留表述的加密
一
开普勒行星“普适定律”
开普勒在《宇宙谐和论》上的原始表述：绕以太阳为焦
点的椭圆轨道运行的所有行星，其各自椭圆轨道半长轴的立
方与周期的平方之比是一个常量；为“普适定律”——常见
表述：绕同一中心天体的所有行星的轨道的半长轴的三次方
（a³）跟它的公转周期的二次方（T²）的比值都相等。开普
勒定律是一个普适定律，适用于一切二体问题。开普勒定律
不仅适用于太阳系，他对具有中心天体的引力系统（如行星
-卫星系统）和双星系统都成立。 围绕同一个中心天体运动
的几个天体，它们轨道半径三次方与周期的平方的比值相
同。
二 开普勒行星三定律
实际星体问题大多数为二体问题，实际应用时，人们把
开普勒定律看成是牛顿定律和万有引力定律的表现形式。(M
为中心天体质量，m 为行星质量)；
开普勒行星三定律:
一:行星饶恒星旋转的轨道为椭圆,且恒星在一个椭心
(焦点)上.二:行星与恒星的连线(矢径)在单位时间内扫过的面积
相等.
三:太阳系中各行星轨道半径 R(椭圆半轴)的立方与行
星运行周期 T 的平方成正比,即 R^3=kT^2 太阳系中的开普
勒恒量 k=3.354*10^13 米^3/秒^2.
三 、开普勒第三定律来自宇宙大爆炸智能原力的广谱
加密与应用：
（一）、通过测出形体的绕转周期以及半长轴，算出双
星的质量及估计中心天体的质量；
（二）、通过两绕同一中心天体运动的行星的公转周期，
算出这两行星分别到中心天体的平均距离。（因实际轨道为
椭圆形，故采用平均距离）。
（三）、在星—箭分离问题中，通过星箭椭圆运动周期
之比，计算星箭运动轨迹半长轴之比。
四 开普勒揭示了大宇宙体系整体生命体系和谐秘籍
开普勒不无遗憾地说， “哥白尼没有觉察到他伸手可得
的财富”。就因为哥白尼知道几个圆合并起来就可以产生椭
圆，却从来没有用椭圆来描述过天体的轨道，并延续了托勒
密的本轮系，忽略了宇宙大爆炸以来形成的一种完整和严
谨。
开普预感宇宙大爆炸形成的宇宙整体性、最简单的大宇
宙体系，仅仅用七个椭圆说就全部解决了宇宙整体生命密
234235
码。并精确地推算行星自大爆炸形成的、符合“自引力作用
下凝聚成密度较高的气体云块，直至恒星和恒星系统”运动
规律。
开普勒定律彰显、证明行星世界是一个匀称的（即
开普勒所说的“和谐”）整体系统。太阳位于每个行星轨道
的焦点之一。行星公转周期决定于各个行星与太阳的距离，
与质量无关。 事实上，从第谷的 20 余年辛勤观测到开普勒
长期的精心推算得到开普勒三定律，在当时没有望远镜的条
件下、也没有宇宙大爆炸理论，能够精准预言大爆炸“一万
年后，物质密度追上辐射密度且超越它，从那时起，宇宙和
它的动力学开始为物质所主导。”并计算得到宇宙和谐行星
三定律，确实是难能可贵的世界天文学千古一大奇迹！——
可谓揭示了宇宙大爆炸生命基因密码相关联的“宇宙和它的
动力学开始为物质所主导”定律、宇宙和谐秘籍！
五
哈雷彗星诡秘循环彰显万有引力普适和谐始于宇
宙大爆炸
哈雷彗星在宇宙“周而复始”周期运转秘籍应该始于宇
宙大爆炸。
哈雷彗星在世界最早的记录是秦始皇七年（公元前 240
年）史载到 1910 年，哈雷彗星共回归了 29 次；英国物理学
家爱德蒙·哈雷（1656-1742）应用牛顿万有引力定律成功
测定其轨道并预言哈雷彗星（周期彗星表编号：1P/Halley）是每 76.1 年环绕太阳一周； 彗星，俗名“扫帚星” ，是围
绕太阳运行的一种天体。人类发现彗星有 1600 多颗，肉眼
能看到的却很少。哈雷研究了第谷的观察大数据，发现 1456
年、1378 年、1301 年、1245 年，一直到 1066 年，历史上都
有大彗星的记录，便意识到这是同一颗彗星。
哈雷在 1705 年发表了《彗星天文学论说》，宣布 1682
年曾引起世人极大恐慌的大彗星 1758 年再次出现于天空，
因为受木星运动影响，回归可能在 1759 年。哈雷已年过五
十知无缘再见，便遗憾地说： “如果彗星最终根据我们的预
言，大约在 1758 年再现的时候，公正的后代将不会忘记这
首先是由一个英国人发现的……”
1759 年 3 月，全世界的天文台都在等待哈雷预言的这颗
彗星。3 月 13 日，这颗明亮的彗星拖着长长的尾巴，出现在
星空中证明了牛顿万有引力定律是宇宙第一定律！
是啊！人类再一次看到哈雷彗星必然是在 2062 年左右
——这里，我们追朔哈雷彗星千古周期之谜，应该在宇宙大
爆炸的时间节点中的“周而复始”本能，去寻找哈雷彗星周
期旋转的基因指令信息“宇宙主要成分为气态物质，并逐步
在自引力作用下凝聚成密度较高的气体云块，直至恒星和恒
星系统。”存在“周而复始”运动规律；
1949 年，美国天文学家惠普尔建立了彗核的“脏雪球模
型” ，提出彗核是由冰和尘埃冻结在一起的团块，宛如一团
236237
脏雪球。并认为彗核的主要化学成分是：氢、碳、氧、硫、
碳氢基、氨基、羟基、水、一氧化碳、二氧化碳等……这将
符合“宇宙主要成分为气态物质”理论！
六
牛顿万有引力定律神奇发现海王星是对宇宙大爆
炸基元行星揭密
因宇宙密码信息 20 世纪最权威的方程式诠释万有
引力定律的发现，带着宇宙灵魂神话色彩-大爆炸：
一天，牛顿在姥姥家的苹果园，在苹果树下漫步，思考
着天上的星星、地球、月球“周而复始……忽然，一颗苹果
落下，可巧落在牛顿肩上；在这一刹那牛顿顿悟了万有引力。
就这样苹果落地宇宙灵魂信息启发牛顿发现了万有引力！
因此，至今牛顿姥姥家的那棵苹果树被誉为“ 肯特 郡
之花”——这是不是宇宙大爆炸基因密码迟到的信息在牛顿
灵魂突然‘灵光一现：宇宙大爆炸确认“（超对称）在这个
阶段，宇宙已经冷却到引力可以分离出来，开始独立存在，
存在传递引力相互作用的引力子。”
谁也无法否定海王星的发现离不开牛顿万有引力定律
的宇宙灵魂信息。法国天文学家布瓦尔正是通过万有引力定
律，对天王星实际轨道和数学计算轨道的误差进行大胆的猜
测求证，认为天王星外侧的宇宙空间还有一颗体型巨大的行
星，以引力干扰天王星的公转，为海王星的发现埋下了伏笔。
人类现代天文学史前，希腊人就有记载伽利略、约翰柯西亚当斯、奥本勒维耶、约翰格弗里恩伽勒早就预言天王星
存在异动，然而，没有牛顿的万有引力定律历史上很多物理
学家很难对宇宙大爆炸运动能有刻骨铭心的认识。
1687 年，牛顿在《自然哲学的数学原理》提出万有引力
定律，牛顿揭示： “任何物体之间都存在引力” ；作为大爆
炸宇宙冷却到一个“度”引力就“开始独立存在，存在传递
引力相互作用的引力子。”万有引力定律证明在天体“任何
物体之间都存在引力”的一种宇宙灵魂信息的确认和普适
性，正有海王星的发现就是牛顿万有引力定律在天文学方面
的一次成功运用。
1821 年，法国天文学家布瓦尔出版了天王星的轨道表。
布瓦尔通过自己的观测发现了一个秘密：天王星的公转轨道
和布瓦尔测算出的理论轨道有一定差距！于是，布瓦尔反思：
难道天王星受到了附近某个星球的引力影响，导致其公转的
轨道和计算出来的轨道有一定差距？
1843 年，英国天文学家亚当斯通过计算，算出了可能影
响天王星公转的太阳系第八颗行星的轨道，亚当斯将计算结
果告诉了英国皇家学会；此时，英国天文学家约翰·赫歇尔
以数学的方法不断的搜索新行星的踪迹，法国天文学家勒威
耶让在柏林天文台工作的德国天文学家约翰·格弗里恩·加
勒对新行星的踪迹进行探索。最终，德国天文学家达赫斯特
和加勒一起，发现了海王星的踪迹，确认是太阳系第八大行
238星，揭示并证明万有引力定律是宇宙大爆炸普适定律，隐秘
着探索宇宙大爆炸基因密码全天候功能！
七 测量星系和星团中炽热气体的温度分布的万有引
力效应影响整个星团发现暗物质
科学家发现，测量星系和星团中炽热气体的温度分布的
万有引力效应影响整个星团发现暗物质。即通过测量炽热气
体的 X-ray 波段的谱形和能流，大概可以反推出气体的温度
和密度。通过温度和密度又可以得到气体的压强。假设气体
受到的来自星团的引力和自身的压强平衡的话，我们就可以
得到星团的质量分布；其后会发现：正常发光的星系的质量
其实只占整个星团质量的 1%；星系间弥散的高温气体的质量
大概占整个星团质量的 10%；剩下大概 90%组分的质量不发
光，但是仍然会通过万有引力来影响整个星团，所以可能是
暗物质。这里，起关键作用的就是牛顿万有引力定律，而不
是爱因斯坦方程式！
1970 年鲁宾（Vera Rubin）和福特（Kent Ford）对仙
女座大星云中星体旋转速度的研究过程，利用高精度的光谱
测量技术，他们可以探测到远离星系核区域的外围星体绕星
系旋转速度和距离的关系。按照牛顿万有引力定律，如果星
系的质量主要集中在星系核区的可见星体上，星系外围的星
体的速度将随着距离而减小。事实上，观测结果表明在相当
大的范围内星系外围的星体的速度是恒定的，证明星系中大
239量不可见物质不仅分布在星系核心区，其质量远大于发光星
体的质量总和。于是，就发现了“暗物质”！
八 现代世界科学家坦言宇宙大爆炸是“上帝的思想”
大天文学家开普勒对天文学有过庄严的定义： “从事天
文研究就是研读上帝的思想。”
德国数学家莱布尼茨也说： “秩序，均匀和和谐令我们
惊讶不己……上帝是纯净的秩序。他是普遍和谐的创造者。”
物理学家爱丁顿这样说： “现代物理学必然把我们引向
上帝——而不是远离他——没有一位无神论的发明家是一
位自然科学家。所有这些无神发明家都是些平庸的哲学家。”
写出划时代开拓性著作《生命是什么》的薛定谔说： “生
命体的结构元素不是人的笨拙作品，而是上帝的量子力学最
精细的杰作，它是根据几条基本原理完成的。”
德国著名生物学家依克斯库尔说： “谁赞美造物的计划，
目的和意图，谁就会赞美造物主上帝的存在。”
德国生物学家拜尔说： “今天我们从大自然的语言中聆
听到的是一首具有崇高规律性和美感的妙不可言的交响曲。
有一天，当我考察了人体。我便相信，我听到了一次最有说
服力的布道。我脱下了帽，我要高唱哈利路亚。”
1920 年获诺贝尔奖的德国杰出物理学家能斯特说： “从
事物理学，就是从背后瞧一眼上帝的创造行为。”
法国物理学家卡雷尔说： “人需要上帝，恰如他需要水
240和氧气 。”
德国化学家李比希说： “人们努力从大自然这本巨大的
书中读懂造物主的思想，这样，他们才能真正认识造物主的
伟大无边的智能。”
世界发明大王爱迪生说： “……我们理应把最伟大的敬
意和惊叹给予所有的工程师们，但是其中最伟大的一个正是
上帝！”
飞船发明家德国的齐柏林说： “上帝才是一位艺术家，
我不过是他的工具罢了。
法国杰出数学家柯西有过一段总结性的自白： “我是一
名基督教，就是说，像第谷、哥白尼、笛卡儿、牛顿、莱布
尼茨、巴斯卡……那样，我也相信基督的神性。他们都是历
史上最伟大的天文学家和数学家。”
意大利电学家伏打说： “……我对上帝的信仰，带给了
我丰硕的成果。”
美国物理学家康普顿说： “我们对大自然了解得越多，
对大自然的上帝以及它在宇宙大戏中所扮演的角色就会更
加理解。”
分类学创始科学家林耐说： “因此必须把这些祖先的不
变性，归于某个全能全知的神，这个神就叫做上帝……”】
颠覆原来诺贝尔物理学奖获得的中国科学家杨振宁同
样承认有“造物主”——2022 年诺贝尔物理学奖已经开学证
241明“当一个人体、表象不存在的时候，那么他们会存在其他
的世界中，而是以游离的情况出现的。死亡后，有人说有幽
灵和灵魂，这其实就是一种粒子，微小的物资。“好比，我
有这个思想的时候，那么在某个地方，同样有这种思想的人
存在。”神学，就是人可以超度，粒子可以借用他人的肉体，
借用肉体的信息（也是一种粒子）指导行为，继续运行。”……
“人的生产方式是变了的，可是人的生活方式没变，依然要
吃饭睡觉运动等等。有一个奇怪的现象，长相、个性也会隔
代遗传，为什么？有人说是基因的原因，有了量子力学纠缠
后，我们或许可以理解为，其实生命没有死去，而是换了一
种存在的方式，只是肉眼看不到。在经过一段时间运动后，
粒子又会依附于生物，变成有形的东西，周而复始。”-引
自《量子力学：人不会死去，人本身就不存在，人来自个人
定义》
九、幽灵般超距作用成真是对“迈克尔逊-莫雷”实验
的颠覆
2022 年 10 月诺贝尔物理学委员会主席说：三位诺贝尔
获奖者对纠缠态的研究已经超越了解释量子力学的基本问
题，那就是因为以三位物理学家的研究为基础，量子纠缠已
经在很多物理体系中被实验证实并且加以利用。比如在我们
实验室中，激光经过非线性晶体，会产生自发参量下转换过
程，一个泵浦光子就会分裂成一对光子，满足相位匹配条件。
242这一对光子就处于某一个特定的纠缠态上。这两个光子无论
相距多远，比如一个留在我的实验室，一个用墨子号卫星发
送到太空，只要我们测量得知我实验室中的光子的状态，不
需要对另外一个在遥远的太空的光子做任何操作，都可以瞬
间获知它的状态。
1935 年，爱因斯坦便和另外 2 个物理学家鲍里斯·波多
尔斯基（Boris Podolsky）和纳森·罗森（Nathan Rosen）
写了一篇著名的论文 Can quantum-mechanical description
of physical reality be considered complete？。
论文中，他们提出了一个原理质疑了量子力学的完备
性：即任何空间上相互影响的速度都不能超过光速，也就是
说量子纠缠超距作用违反了定域性原理。鉴此，根据纠缠与
幽灵和“超距作用”是真实存在的！
我们必须重新深刻思考迈克尔逊-莫雷设计的实验（自
此光速就不变）：实验精心设置的干涉仪和分束器来检测以
太风的速度，在一年中的不同时间进行，以解释地球的运动
——当年，实验完全忽略和不承认纠缠与幽灵和“超距作用”
（ 哪 时 - 迈 克 尔 逊 － 莫 雷 实 验 (Michelson-Morley
Experiment)，是 1887 年迈克尔逊和莫雷在美国克利夫兰做
的用迈克尔逊干涉仪测量两垂直光的光速差值的一项著名
的物理实验。但结果证明光速在不同惯性系和不同方向上都
是相同的，由此否认了以太（绝对静止参考系）的存在，从
243而动摇了经典物理学基础……）这是反科学历史的实验——
对于【纠缠与幽灵和“超距作用”】早在 1885 年，马赫写
了《感觉的分析》论文，在那个时代影响巨大，幽灵物理学
收获巨丰，竞改变了感觉心理学；更早在 1664 年，笛卡儿
提出“以太”观念——以太论。“以太”一词是英文 Ether
或 Aether 的音译。最早由古希腊哲学家亚里士多德提出，
设想是普遍存在的一种物质，内涵随物理学发展而演变。而
在亚里士多德看来，物质元素除了水、火、气、土之外，还
有一种居于天空上层的以太。以太在科学史上带有一种神秘
色彩，泛指青天或上层大气，相当今天被证明的【纠缠与幽
灵和“超距作用”】物的量子！
公元 1270 年，阿拉伯科学家阿尔.哈森的《光学大全》
也称《光学宝鉴》，应用球面镜和抛物面反射镜发现透镜的
放大效应和大气折射，成为最早研究光学的学者；《光学宝
鉴》（Kitab al-Manazir），被许多人认为是伊本·海瑟姆
最重要的贡献。它在 1270 年被翻译成拉丁语为《阿尔哈森
的光学论文》。其实在古希腊光学方面的主要工作是托勒密
的《至大论》，《至大论》书中的托勒密天文观测记录，最
早的日期为公元 127 年 3 月 26 日，最晚的日期为 141 年 2
月 2 日。由托勒密留下的观测记录来看，他的所有天文观测
都是在埃及（当时在罗马帝国统治之下）的亚历山大城；
惠更斯的“介质中任一处的波动状态是由各处的波动决
244245
定的”并认为，以太又在很大程度上作为光波的荷载物同光
的波动学说相联系。光的波动说是由 R.胡克首先提出的，并
为 C.惠更斯所进一步发展，到了 17 世纪，笛卡尔进一步丰
富了“以太”内涵-法国数学家 R.笛卡尔建立了以太旋涡说，
用来解释太阳系内各行星的运动。笛卡尔的以太观念，既推
翻亚里士多德的“以太”虚拟假设，又丰富了未来物理学想
象空间，成为量子隐形传播的先知先觉伟大科学家——“量
子隐形传态就是将未知量子态从一个粒子传递到另一个粒
子的方式，而这过程不需要传递粒子本身。”
也就是说，从亚里士多德、托勒密，一直到笛卡尔，
一代代科学家们历经 3000 年用实验数据才证明了量子纠缠
是真实存在并把以太和量子统一起来，确认了爱因斯坦错
误！……
第十三章
宇宙大爆炸生命形成 DNA 结构的三维立体与生
命“软性封闭系统”
一
生命得以“活”着必然存在“软性封闭系统”
什么是“软性封闭系统”？
软性封闭系统概念的范畴是：地球和生物界任何种的个
体。 柏拉图到 80 年代拉夫罗夫“盖亚假说”实验证明了“地
球是一个活的巨大生物体——柏拉图” ；地球外层存在重重
叠叠的软性大气层，保障地球不受宇宙行星，特别是小星星
侵袭。同理，地球上无论任何种的生物个体，我们都可以把246
它看成为某种特殊而一定的“小气候” ，即看成为某种特殊
而一定的（软性）封闭系统；无论是自氧型，还是异氧型的
生物，无论是微生物，还是低等的藻类或繁盛的被子植物，
从单细胞动物的绿眼虫到脊索动物的黑斑娃，直到哺乳动物
灵长目、人科、人种、现代人……无一例外。也就是说，世
界上任何生物种的个体，都可以解析成为相对独立的（软性）
封闭系统。例如：植物界的树木。无论任何种的树的个体植
株，除根系在土壤内、干、枝、叶都伸展在空间中，它们和
外界（空气、水分、阳光、射线）都有一定特殊的隔离层。
如果把树木个体和外界的一定联系渠道略去不计（根系、气
孔……），尽管树的形态是怎样的千姿百态，根、茎、枝、
叶是怎样的错综复杂，实际上它都是一个完整的软性封闭系
统。因为，所有种的个体都是有生命的液相结构的封闭系统，
所以我们把它叫做软性封闭系统。动物界也是一样，人也是
一样；略去口、鼻、肛门、尿道口（这些都是相对封闭的），
就形成特殊而一定的软性封闭系统。一切动物、植物、微生
物、细菌、真菌……凡是生命物无一例外，都是这样！
二
生态能是“软性封闭系统”生命存在的亘古本性
什么是“生态能”？
薛定谔的“生命以负熵为生”法则看负熵就是“生态能” ；
由于生态能是由生物个体聚集形成的不同物种群落系
统，相互关连的软性封闭系统单元生物能量量度的无穷集合为“生态熵” ，并不间断为所有生物种的个体生态系统提供
“负熵”。
在达尔文的物种关连增殖或减量的量变规律中，如果把
物种群落（猫--鼠--蜂--草--人）当作生物能的集合（能基
质单位）来认识，就自然形成生态能（熵）平衡的某一态势
的量值和量变规律，这是生态能 W 量变的表述。
如果我们把赤道当作地球生态能最大（量）径线位，从
赤道向南北极的环纬度线，就会自然形成双向（向南极、向
北极）螺旋线，以南北极极点为螺旋线的奇点，便构成了生
态能在地球、地质、地理分布的复变函数无穷集合的区域熵
的有规则排列，呈两个对称螺旋线系统。
可见生态能熵，永远处于是十分复杂的动态耗散过程，
是生物能群落无限有限无穷集合的态势平衡分布的动态“负
熵”效应。
故薛定谔量子力学生命概念是： “生命以负熵为生”！
三 软性封闭系统的旁白“生态熵”
熵是一个物理学系统概念。薛定谔把物理学整合到生物
学，用量子力学存生物理生物学；在生命过程亦被用于计算
一个系统中的失序现象和复杂程度。熵亦是生态学中表示生
物多样性的指标，起源于生命“软性封闭系统”生态性状，
是繁纷复杂的大大小小多样化的生命多维“软”系统决定的；
熵并不是生命科学外来借助物理学的概念；虽然生命“熵”
247248
起源热力学第二定律试图解释生命现象，仅仅是一种生命科
学认识史在物理生命学的重大突破。
地球、生命的“软性封闭系统”自生命诞生伊始的 46
亿年（从宇宙大爆炸计算应该是 100 亿年），就在所有菌毒
存在，经过几十亿年物种演化、到人类出现，一直到 19 世
纪科学家才发现了热力学第二定律；熵的概念最先在 1864
年首先由克劳修斯提出，并应用在热力学中；后来在 1948
年由克劳德·艾尔伍德·香农第一次引入到信息论中——值
得庆幸的是，世界量子物理学大师薛定谔早于 5 年前的 1943
年，在英国三一学院高等研究院所作系列讲演，就创建完成
了 20 世纪最伟大的科学经典著作《生命是什么？》（1944
年 9 月出版）。
《生命是什么？》划时代历史著作，解开了生命概念无
穷无尽的深藏历史演化奥秘，在人类历史上第一次说清楚
“熵”与“活”生命体唯一得以持之以恒、长期存在的秘密
—— 任何种的生命个体都是以“软性封闭系统”存在“生
命以负熵为生”！
四
“生态熵”四要素
“生态熵”不是指一个事情的不确定的程度.也不像信
息技术中的计算式是 I=lg(p),p 那样是一个事情的概率。“生
态熵”是生命体不可或缺的能量要素；
“生态熵”要素有四：阳光、水、空气、食物。
因为地球是一个活的巨大生物体——柏拉图，100 亿年
地球诞生以来，水与陆地的比就是 7:3——地球名副其实是
巨大的水球（巨大的软性封闭系统）。鉴此，地球上所有生
命生物体的水含量均在近似 7：3 的范围之间；如果水不被
细胞吸收，就不能参与人体（生物体）一系列生命代谢活动，
生命就不复存在；故人不能离开水。20 世纪 50 年代中期，
科学家发现，细胞膜中存在着某种通道只允许水分子出入，
美国科学家阿格雷和麦金农发现“细胞膜水道”获得 2003
年诺贝尔奖；揭示水对于人体（生命体）至关重要，水通道
是所有生物体最重要的一种细胞膜通道。自然而然水是“生
态熵”要素之一！
要素之二是空气。人体一分一秒都离不开空气，这是大
自然的造化：人和动物吸入氧气，呼出二氧化碳；植物相反
吸入二氧化碳、呼出氧气维持空气成份的平衡。
马尔萨斯 1798 年在《人口论》提出马尔萨斯二原理，
之一是食物是人类生存所必须；二是两性间的性欲是必然
的。人类离不开食物！马尔萨斯是人类第一个英国教士留下
的“食物熵”理论宝贵记载；马尔萨斯在剑桥大学毕业前夕
阅读了吉本的《罗马帝国的衰落》，内容涉及那些野蛮民族
的发源与发展，而正是这些野蛮民族形成了今天欧洲的精致
的政体，启示食物（熵）掠夺在民族形成的至关重要！
249250
从科学历史看，熵的概念最先在 1864 年首先由克劳修
斯提出，并应用在热力学中，1948 年由克劳德·艾尔伍德·香
农第一次引入到信息论中；值得庆幸的是：在 1943 年著名
物理学家薛定谔在英国三一学院作讲演，讲演稿在 1944 年
出版划时代历史剧著《生命是什么？》，系统性跨物理学界
独一无二地论述，提出“生命以负熵为生”生命法则。
原子五 “生态熵”三要素是生命“软性封闭系统”活
着动力之能量本源。
生命软性封闭系统起源应该和地球最早的生物病菌起
源同步，因为宇宙大爆炸 100 亿年左右地球出现，而生命最
早出现的形态是微生物病菌。
现代科学记载，2017 年 3 月“据西班牙《国家报》3 月
1 日报道，一个由伦敦、美国和挪威等国的地质学家、古生
物学家和纳米科学家组成的国际团队日前在加拿大魁北克
省北部哈德森湾的 Nuvvuagittuq 绿石带上发现了一些距今
37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿年的细菌化石，地球诞生至今 50 亿年，
因此，此次发现的细菌化石被认为是迄今已知最古老的生命
证据。”……“Nuvvuagittuq 绿石带上包含了一些地质学领
域已知的最古老的沉积岩——证明生命软性封闭系统起源
应该和地球最早的生物病菌起源同步！
六
古老化石证明百亿年左右前就诞生了细菌微生物
软性封闭系统之源251
现代科学认为“从源头上说，这些沉积岩是一个富含放
射性铁的深海热液喷口的一部分。很多科学家认为，这些能
源和矿产丰富的地方就是 40 亿年前地球上孕育最初生命形
式——最早的细菌——的摇篮。”——《科学家发现已知最
古老生命证据：40 亿年前细菌化石 2017-03-03 00:21:02 来
源：参考消息网 责任编辑：周擎浩 》
按霍金“大爆炸”理论，宇宙、地球需要 6-8 亿年的冷
却期，这样，138 亿年去掉 10 亿年就是 128 亿年，所以太阳、
地球冷却到微生物出现，在 100 亿年左右是完全可能的；现
代考古学认为：在距今 37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿间，在宇宙大爆
炸时间轴看，地球诞生 100 亿年后出现细菌，才能地球在冷
却后漫长的地质演化过程中，沉积成为化石。又因为微生物
进入形成化石需要漫长的水陆变迁；鉴此，微生物必须早于
地质变迁……
伦敦学院大学科学家马修·多德认为，这项发现对生命
是在地球诞生后不久萌芽于深海热喷口的理论提供了支持。
地球上生命的诞生如此迅速也与此前发现的一些距今 37 亿
年的微生物相吻合——这种现代科学没有把宇宙大爆炸考
虑进去！
七
古希腊早就揭示人体“软性封闭系统”之生命本性
人体“软性封闭系统”理论已经有 3000 多年历史；公
元前 450 年，古希腊医圣早在希波克拉底研究发现“体液说” ：希波克拉底(Hippocrates)体液学说认为：气质取决于人体
内的血液、黏液、黄胆汁、黑胆汁等四种液体的混合比例。
虽 然 细 菌 这 名 词 最 早 是 德 国 科 学 家 埃 伦 伯 格
（Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg，1795-1876）在 1828
年提出，指某种细菌，词来源于希腊语βακτηριον，
意为“小棍子” ，可见当初在古希腊就有细菌形态的微小软
性之表述和记载。
盖伦对体液说深有同感，著有《气质》《本能》……认
同液体失调完全与大自然外界因素休戚相关。可见，生命“软
性封闭系统”是一个长期内外环境演化的结果：
希波克拉底体液说强烈要求一个医生进入某个城市首
先要注意这个城市的方向、土壤、气候、风向、水源、水、
饮食习惯、生活方式等……与人的健康和疾病有密切关联的
自然环境。
八 托马斯认为： “任何认为地球的生命是脆弱的想法，
都是人的幻觉
实际上，地球的生命乃是宇宙间可以想象到的最坚韧的
膜，它不理会几率，也不可能让死亡透过。而我们倒是那膜
的柔弱的部分，就象纤毛一样短暂、脆弱。而且，人早就在
杜撰一种存在，他认为这种存在使自己高于其他生命。几千
年来，人就这么脑汁绞尽，用心独专地想象着。因为是幻觉，
所以，这种想象今天如同过去一样没有使他满足。人乃是扎
252根在自然中的。”——美国科学院院士刘易斯.托马斯托马
斯确认地球“膜”是坚韧软性封闭系统。与古希腊公元前 400
年大哲学家柏拉图说“地球是巨大活生物体”存在异曲同工
之妙！
九 布尔吉斯生命化石群把生命起源推到五亿年前甚至
更早仅仅是现代人的化石印记到是达尔文的噩梦
1909 年 8 月，加拿大地质学家维尔卡特和家人到加拿大
落基山脉的布尔吉斯山去野外旅行；在回来的路上，一块石
头绊倒他的夫人坐骑，维尔卡特捡起险些伤到夫人的怪，仔
细观察发现，竟是一块保存着软体动物的化石——就这样偶
然发现了中寒武纪三叶虫和像蠕虫那样的动物软体动物化
石群；史称： “寒武纪生命大爆发”！
加拿大布尔吉斯生物群，位于加拿大的大不列颠哥伦比
亚省，约为 5.05 亿年前的中寒武世，约有 119 属 140 种海
洋动物、发现节肢动物优势种群，还有海绵、蠕虫、腕足、
棘皮、脊索动物等的软体深海动物化石群——就这样维尔卡
特把生命起源推到五亿年前甚至更早。
这样的“海绵、蠕虫、腕足、棘皮、脊索动物等的软体
深海动物化石” ，就无可辩驳地证明生命“软性封闭系统”
必须在希波克拉底体液说之前的 5 亿年前——与宇宙大爆炸
相关联……
1909 年发现的布尔吉斯生命化石群是生命“软性封闭系
253254
统”在古希腊史前无可辩驳的真实存在。这里，欠缺宇宙大
爆炸时间轴的确切时间频段……但也成为达尔文的噩梦！
十
现代土壤形成微生物 37 亿年的“软性封闭系统”
生命属性仍然欠缺宇宙大爆炸时间轴的确切时间频段
从卡森对土壤形成的表述看 微生物 37 亿年的“软性封
闭系统”生命属性；
卡森说“像补丁一样覆盖着大陆薄层控制着我们人类和
大地上各种动物的生存。如我们所知，若没有土壤，陆地植
物不能生长；而没有植物，动物就无法生活。
如果说我们的以农业为基础的生活依然依赖于土壤的
话，那么同样真实的是，土壤也依赖于生命；土壤本身的起
源及其所保持的天然特征都与活的动、植物有亲密的关系。
因为，土壤在一定程度上是生命的创造物，它产生于很久以
前生物与非生物之间的奇异相互作用。当火山爆发出炽热的
岩流时，当奔腾于陆地光秃秃的岩石上的水流磨损了甚至最
坚硬的花岗石时；当冰霜严寒劈裂和破碎了岩石时，原始的
成土物质就开始得到聚集。然后，生物开始了它们奇迹般的
创造，一点一点地使这些无生命的物质变成了土壤。岩石的
第一个覆盖物——地衣，利用它们的酸性分泌物促进了花岗
岩的风化作用，从而为其他生命造就了栖息的地方。藓类在
原始土壤的微小空隙中坚持生长，这种土壤是由地衣的碎
屑，微小昆虫的外壳和起源于大海的一系列动物的碎片所组成的。
生命创造了土壤，而异常丰富多彩的生命物质也生存于
土壤之中，否则，土壤就会成为一种死亡和贫瘠的东西了，
正是由于土壤中无数有机体的存在和活动，才使土壤能给大
地披上绿色的外衣。
土壤置身于无休无止的循环之中，这使它总是处于持续
变化的状态。当岩石遭受风化时，当有机物腐烂时，当氮及
其他气体随雨水从天而降时，新物质就不断被引进土壤中来
了。同时，另外有一些物质被从土壤中取走了，它们是被生
物因暂时需用而借走的，微妙的，非常重要的化学变化不断
地发生在这样一个过程中，在此过程中，来自空气和水中的
元素被转换为宜于植物利用的形式。在所有这些变化中，活
的有机体总是积极的参与者。”
这段文字，几乎是对土壤最优美的唱赞诗！
这里，没有学术的专业术语和化学方程式；
这里，没有地质变迁的学术讨论；
这里，没有对细菌和昆虫、软体动物对土壤耕耘珍贵记
元的分析……
可这里，把亘古 37 亿年土壤和微生物对土壤形成、相
得益彰的一切演化历史全部都涵概和描述得清清楚楚
了！……
不是么？“没有哪些研究能比探知生存于黑暗的土壤之
255中的生物的巨大数量问题更令人迷惑了，同时也更易于被忽
视的了。关于土壤有机体之间彼此制约的情况以及土壤有机
体与地下环境，地上环境相制约的情况我们也还只知道一点
点。”——卡森
1909 年加拿大布尔吉斯生物群、2003 年中国云南澄江
生物群和贵州凯里生物群构成世界三大页岩型生物群，为寒
武纪的地质历史时期的生命大爆发提供证据：大约 5 亿 4200
万年前到 5 亿 3000 万年前，在地质学上被认为是寒武纪的
开始时间，寒武纪地层在 2000 多万年时间内突然出现门类
众多的无脊椎动物化石的“寒武爆发”就已经完全把生命“软
性封闭系统”定格在五亿年之前，寒武纪是宇宙地球现代生
命开始出现、发 展的时期——也就是说，现代科学仅仅证
明：每克土壤含菌量达几十亿-几仟亿（沙漠含菌量仅 10 万
/g）。土壤中的细菌来源：一是动物体，二是天然生活在土
壤中的自养菌和腐物寄生菌。细菌在土壤各层分布不均：表
面含菌量少；距表面 10-20cm 土壤含菌量最多。土层越深，
菌数越少——土壤的形成要比“寒武纪生命大爆发”更久，
土壤是微生物“软性封闭系统”亘古世纪的演化和人体液说
的渊源，可以追朔到 37 亿年前，甚至与细菌 40 亿年诞生同
步！
开始啊！这里仍然欠缺宇宙大爆炸时间轴的确切时间频
段！
256257
第十四章
宇宙大爆炸太阳太阳系诞生形成的整体生
命学反思
一
万物生长靠太阳
“万物生长靠太阳”这是千古不变的民谚。
地球围绕太阳旋转；太阳光普照大地确实亘古不变！
古希腊哲学家亚里士多德最早思考过太阳光和生命的
关联，这是真实的古希腊文明史；谁也没有想到：霍金的宇
宙大爆炸却导出在现代这片宇宙，起源于大约 137 亿年前的
一个奇点，这个奇点无穷重无穷小，后来这个奇点爆炸了，
然后形成了今天的这片宇宙和太阳！
这里，霍金大爆炸理论的关键是“奇点” 、 “爆炸” ；
一个密度无限大体积无限小的一个点。于 137 亿年前在这个
点爆炸了，最终形成了今天这片宽约 960 亿光年的宇宙——
于是，太阳就在大爆炸中诞生，是太阳孵化了宇宙地球生命
吗?！
这里，现代科学认为，微生物化石见证在 37 亿年，霍
金宇宙大爆炸确认，太阳早在 100 亿年前就诞生，生生熙熙
普照大地；
二 对太阳与太阳系人类的认知太晚了吧
从宇宙大爆炸看太阳与太阳系人类认识太晚了吧？！
公元 145 年托勒密的《至大论》是最早观察太阳与太阳
系的伟大著作家，它详细地给出了太阳、月亮和行星运动的数学理论。托勒密通过对每个行星的运动提供细节，做出了
他（人类）最原始的贡献。《至大论》最初的希腊标题为《数
学汇编》（The Mathematical Compilation），标题随后很
快被另一个希腊标题所取代，意为最《伟大的汇编》、后从
阿拉伯语翻译成拉丁语时，得到名《至大论》。
托勒密(Ptolemy)定理指出，圆的内接凸四边形两对对
边乘积的和等于两条对角线的乘积。
原文：圆的内接四边形中，两对角线所包矩形的面积等
于 一组对边所包矩形的面积与另一组对边所包矩形的面积
之和。
从这个定理可以推出正弦、余弦的和差公式及一系列
的三角恒等式，托勒密定理实质上是关于共圆性的基本性
质，观测最早日期为公元 127 年 3 月 26 日，最晚的日期为
141 年 2 月 2 日。
古希腊之后，一直到 1308 年后的 1453 年，哥白尼《天
体运行论》出版结束了教皇 5000 年“地心论”的统治，开
始了“日心论”的天文学新纪元；依然确认了托勒密太阳系
的有九大行星。哥白尼按照离太阳的距离从近到远来排序，
它们依次为水星、金星、地球、火星、木星、土星、天王星、
冥王星、海王星；2006 年 8 月 24 日冥王星定义为“矮行星” ，
自此就改写了哥白尼的九大行星成为“太阳系八大行星” ；
然而，现代人即使把冥王星踢出九大行星，太阳系依旧按自
258己九大行星固有的位置运行、并无一丝一毫地改变！——现
代人画蛇添足！
康德第一个预言自然界真得具有“一种能自行从混沌变
成完善的宇宙体系的神奇本领。”用“星云假说”说明宇宙
形成，构成了自然、宇宙、生命、万物的永恒与和谐。
现代人的八行星的具体数据如下：
地球：地球按照距太阳由近到远的次序为第三颗行星，
就是我们赖以生存的星球，有水、有大气、有生命，是八大
行星中唯一适宜生命生存和繁衍的行星。
现代人的太阳系八大行星详细数据：
259三 现代人科学家说太阳诞生①
现代科学家说，太阳的诞生已经有约 50 亿年,那么从理
论上讲太阳的光辉已经在宇宙中跑了 50 亿年,因此向外扩展
至少有 50 亿光年的距离,不过考虑到宇宙膨胀的作用,太阳
光的实际距离还要更远一些——由于 3000 年教皇体制“宇
宙神创”一直到哥白尼《天体运行论》，才用布鲁诺百花广
场残忍的火焚唤醒全人类！
1755 年德国哲学家康德著述完成《宇宙发展史概论》，
大胆否定了宇宙起源的神创论；
康德在《宇宙发展史概论》论述说： “构成我们太阳系
星球的物质，在最初时都分解为基本微粒，充满整个宇宙空
间。……这些微粒具有促使它们相互运动的基本能力，它们
本身就是活力的一个源泉。在这种情况下，物质就立即努力
于形成自己。密度较大而分散的一类微粒，凭借引力从它周
260261
围的天空区域，把密度较小的物质聚集起来。但它们自己又
与所聚集的物质一起，聚集到密度更大质点所在的地方。而
所有这些又以同样方式聚集到质点密度更为巨大的地方，并
如此一直继续下去，直到形成诸团块天体。在这同时，斥力
使凝聚起来的团块天体发生旋转运动。”……“向引力中心
下落的微粒，由于斥力的作用，会杂乱地从直线运动中向侧
面偏转出来，使垂直的下落运动变成围绕降落中心的圆周运
动”——旋转运动，逐渐向一个垂直于其转动轴的平面集中，
最后形成行星绕太阳运转的圆盘状结构的有规则的天体系
统——上述描述创世纪地使宇宙天体生成理论，历史性第一
次从神学禁锢中解脱。可是啊！50 亿年的宇宙大爆炸时间轴
太短太短……
四
现代人科学家说太阳诞生②
41 年后 1796 年，法国数学家拉普拉斯（Laplace）独
立自主地提出星云假说。拉普拉斯认为，太阳系是一个灼热
的气体星云冷却收缩而成的。原始的灼热星云呈球状，直径
比今天太阳系直径大得多，缓慢地自转着，渐渐冷却、收缩，
体积缩小、自转速度迅速变快，导致赤道附近离心力变得最
大，星云形态扁平化。压迫赤道边缘的气体物质便分离出来，
形成一个旋转的气环，这一过程反反复复形成另一个旋转的
气环，最终形成“拉普拉斯环” ；星云的中心部分最后形成
太阳。九环在绕太阳旋转的过程中逐渐聚集形成太阳系的九
大行星。每一个行星也同样发生各自的旋转环系成卫星。
拉普拉斯描述土星的光环，由尚未聚集成卫星的许多质
点构成的。
拉普拉斯假说可以解释行星运行轨道的各项特点，以及
组成太阳、行星；并认为构成卫星的元素存在一致性 ，也
能解释太阳系角动量的由来。
但解释不了角动量分配的特点。另外，而是由于吸引力
引起的。星云在收缩过程中，温度不是降低而是升高。
——《天文学简史》文摘
缺憾仍然是 50 亿年宇宙形成的宇宙大爆炸时间轴太短
太短……
五 现代人科学家说太阳诞生③
1945 年，德国物理学家魏扎克提出的旋涡太阳形成学
说。魏扎克认为，星云盘内离太阳相同距离的质点的公转椭
圆轨道具有不同的偏心率，所以盘内会出现旋涡。旋涡的排
列很有规则性：盘分为几个同心环，越外面的环越宽，每个
环内有同样数量的旋涡，魏扎克估计的数目是五个。旋涡内
物质的转动方向和公转方向相反。在相临两环的三个旋涡之
间，会出现次级旋涡，这些次级旋涡的转动方向和公转方向
一致，行星就在这种次级旋涡里形成，所以行星具有正向自
转。通过适当选择初始条件，这个理论不但能说明行星的公
262263
转和自转，而且能够说明行星间的距离。
——《天文学简史》文摘
缺憾仍然是宇宙形成没有宇宙大爆炸时间轴的色彩、宇
宙形成的宇宙大爆炸时间轴太短太短……
六
现代人科学家说太阳诞生④
霍伊尔的假说试图解释角动量问题。按照他的方案，质
量巨大的缓慢旋转的太阳星云，在引力的作用下不断坍塌，
直到一个不稳定的原太阳形成之后坍塌才终止。在原太阳周
围，星云物质呈环状分布。环中的气态物质发生凝聚，原太
阳的部分角动量转移到受磁力作用的电离气体环，而宇宙尘
埃粒子的吸收则给正在形成的行星增加了质量。然而，在原
太阳附近，较轻元素被不断增加的辐射赶走。结果形成了两
类不同的行星枣靠近太阳的类地行星和离太阳较远的类木
行星。
——《天文学简史》文摘
这是 1724 年德国康德提出星云假说的进一步升华，仍
然没有宇宙大爆炸的色彩。
七 现代人科学家说太阳诞生⑤
1942 年瑞典天体物理学家阿尔文（H. Alfven）提出了
自己的星云假说。他认为，太阳先形成，行星和卫星则是由
远处下落到太阳附近的弥漫物质形成的。最初这些物质温度
高而且是电离的，它们被太阳的磁场和星……际磁场维持在离太阳几千天文单位（天文单位是太阳和
地球之间的平均距离）的空间，后来由于冷却，才由电离状
态转变为中性状态，并向太阳下落。下落中的物质相互碰撞
聚集，并不断被加速，当其动能增加到一定程度就再度电离，
从而停止降落，便在太阳附近形成若干云团。云团里逐渐形
成了行星和卫星。另外，太阳磁场的磁力线随太阳的自转而
转动，使云团中的电离质点随之转动，云团中的中性质点也
被电离物质拖着转动，这就意味着太阳通过磁场作用把自己
的一部分角动量转移给了云团，所以行星具有很大的角动
量。
——《天文学简史》文摘
1942 年瑞典天体物理学家阿尔文（H. Alfven）提出了
自己的星云假说同样没有和宇宙大爆炸融合；但是提出了
“太阳先形成”理论的突破，难能可贵。
本章小结
公元 145 年托勒密的《至大论》是最早观察太阳与太阳
系以来，一直到 1308 年后的 1453 年，哥白尼《天体运行论》
诞生，开始了现代人科学家对宇宙天宇地球太阳系的观测研
究，1755 年德国哲学家康德著述完成《宇宙发展史概论》提
出第一个“星云假说” ， 1796 年，法国数学家拉普拉斯
（Laplace）独立自主地提出星云假说，看点是“拉普拉斯
环”太阳系的前身；1945 年，德国物理学家魏扎克提出的旋
264涡太阳形成学说、其后霍伊尔的假说，认为质量巨大的缓慢
旋转的太阳星云，在引力的作用下不断坍塌，直到一个不稳
定的原太阳形成之后坍塌才终止，认可“太阳先形成说” ；
1942 年瑞典天体物理学家阿尔文（H. Alfven）提出了自己
的星云假说。他认为，太阳先形成，行星和卫星则是由远处
下落到太阳附近的弥漫物质形成的——这些科学家研究成
果难能可贵，为宇宙大爆炸做出铺垫功不可没！
八 太阳太阳系诞生形成和宇宙大爆炸整体生命学“小
宇宙体系”思考与反思①
公元 145 年托勒密完成了《至大论》的 1308 年后的 1453
年哥白尼完成了划时代历史巨著《天体运行论》，确立了“大
宇宙体系” ；1628 年哈维完成的《心血运动论》确立了“小
宇宙体系” ，在在哥白尼的日心说的启发下，哈维冥思苦想：
“血液为什么不可能是绕着心脏做循环运动呢？心脏难道
不是身体内的太阳吗？”
完成了《心血运动论》哈维骄傲地说“啊！地上也有天
上的运动！赞美啊！小宇宙体系我心中的太阳……”
公元前 400 年古希腊科学巨擘柏拉图就预言说：
“地球是一个巨大的活生物体！”
2400 年后得到英国国科学家拉夫罗夫科学实验“盖亚假
说”的证明；假说是英国大气学家詹姆斯·拉夫罗夫（James
E. Lovelock）在 20 世纪 60 年代末提出的，后与美国生物
265学家马古利斯（Lynn Margulis）共同推进证明了柏拉图的
伟大预言“地球是一个巨大活的生物体”！——揭示了生命
的整体性、生命与环境的相互作用下，自始至终维护地球生
命可持续生存，呵护地球适合生命的持续生存与发展。把哥
白尼、哈维、拉夫罗夫理论一直追溯到永远古，直到古希腊
的柏拉图预言“地球是一个巨大的活生物体！”——这就形
成了宇宙地球整体生命学理论原理雏形！
九 太阳太阳系诞生形成和宇宙大爆炸整体生命学思考与反
思②
前面我们简述了《天文学简史》关于康德、拉普拉斯、
魏扎可、霍伊尔、阿尔文的太阳与太阳系形成假说，太阳太
阳系理论诞生在 1755 年到 1942 年的 187 年间；假说界定太
阳太阳系诞生形成时间都是在 46 亿或者 50 亿年——时间太
短！
这里，太阳太阳系诞生形成的物质都是原始星云团；原
始星云团从哪里来？什么时间诞生？都是什么物质？等等
——都没有说！
旋转、压缩、收缩、变扁、吸引力、星云盘、聚集形成
太阳、逃逸、捕获——都是在星云团运动展开且温度不高
（200 度），没有热核反应；更没有宇大宙生命空间场和大
爆炸奇点和多个宇宙体系的关联！……
缺少太阳、太阳系、宇宙地球万物“相互作用” ，使大
266267
宇宙体系客观世界形成一个有机生命整体，并处于不断地运
动和变化发展中，臻至完善。
这里缺少赫托格说的： “这解释了宇宙膨胀是如何开始
的。早期宇宙的膨胀解决了一些主要的谜题，比如宇宙为什
么是大的和统一的，而不是完全一致的。
“膨胀的答案是，近乎均匀性的原因是早期宇宙中暴涨
的量子涨落。”
“今天，我们仍然可以看到这些膨胀的波动的迹象，在
大爆炸的余辉中出现微小的变化——宇宙微波背景，宇宙只
有 38 万年的时候发出。” 等等！……
这里， “宇宙只有 38 万年的时候发出”“宇宙微波背
景”仅仅是现代人科学家的猜想，与宇宙大爆炸时间轴出入
太大、太大！
十
从小宇宙体系诞生形成看宇宙生命奇点与爆炸
【“对点”假如地球位于离开一个给定圆周之圆心有一
定距离的点上， “对点”则为地球位置的镜像，位于圆心的
另一边，该点与圆心的距离与圆心与地球的距离相等，然后
他用这个点来定义圆周上的运动，圆周上的点不是匀速运
动，而是以变速运动，速度变化的规律是，让一个在“对点”
上的观测看来是匀速运动的。因此， “对点”的设置对天体
运动必是匀速圆周运动这一古希腊原则的冒犯。但是显然，
托勒密考虑得更多的是精确行星位置预报和数学上的便利，而不是真实与否的问题。】——神奇的是“对点”出现在 1628
年哈维参照哥白尼“大宇宙体系” ，发现人体心血运动论，
创建了“小宇宙体系”——心（脏）就是我们心中的太阳！
心（脏）就是小宇宙体系的太阳；
那么，心太阳是如何诞生形成的呢？
心！起源于人生命的奇点——精子和卵子在子宫一个
“奇点”受精，诞生受精卵，此时心（脏）已在其中了；因
为按人体生命基因密码“小宇宙体系”渐渐形成与身体五脏
六腑同步生成，逐渐长大； “膨胀”时间大約十个月；经过
10 月怀胎，胎儿分娩、坠地，成为婴儿——也就是说，小宇
宙体系是从奇点（大爆炸）的生命基因密码指令逐渐在血液
流动过程的“相互作用”万亿细胞膨胀来完成心和五脏六腑、
骨骼肌肉、身体与皮毛的整体“膨胀、波动” ，形成婴儿。
万亿卵细胞膨胀生长“大的和统一的”生命体基因信息休戚
相关；心就相当于“小宇宙体系”的太阳，五脏六腑、骨骼
肌肉、身体皮毛就相当于“小宇宙体系”的太阳系！子宫一
个受精卵就相当于小宇宙体系的“奇点” 、细胞“膨胀”生
长发育过程就相当于“小宇宙体系”“对点”生命大爆炸。
这里，生命基因密码是隐秘在生命大爆炸自始至终、看
不见的“遗传因子”全天候指令信息！……
十一 大、小宇宙体系的宇宙诞生都存在形成“奇点、爆炸”
霍金的奇迹是霍金的宇宙大爆炸理论。霍金提出现在这
268269
片宇宙起源于大约 137 亿年前的一个奇点，这个奇点无穷重
无穷小；这个奇点爆炸了，膨胀了，从炽热、膨胀，经过百
亿年冷却下来，渐渐形成了今天的这片宇宙！
霍金的大爆炸理论的两个关键点，一个是奇点，一个是
爆炸——和小宇宙体系存在生命“奇点”与“爆炸”极其相
似；不同的是大爆炸“奇点” ，在霍金的理论学说当中是一
个密度无限大体积无限小的一个点。后来这个点爆炸了渐渐
形成了今天这片宽约 960 亿光年的宇宙。
宇宙大“爆炸”存在一个临界值——就相当于生命“对
点”“大爆炸”在人体子宫一个“奇点”那样的偶然出现“0”
的“临界值”。
也就是说， 大、小宇宙体系的宇宙诞生都有的共同点
是这个奇点有体积，这个体积无限小，小到无限接近于 0 的
临界值。都是人肉眼看不见，又自始至终存在着巨量生命信
息——“奇点” 、 “爆炸” 、 “临界值”……
这里还有一个关键： “膨胀” ：
小宇宙体系是亿亿细胞膨胀；
大宇宙体系是一种万物膨胀、小宇宙体系是一个生命全
方位膨胀……
十二
宇宙大爆炸理论简史
“大爆炸宇宙论”（The Big Bang Theory）认为：宇
宙是由一个致密炽热的奇点于 137 亿年前一次大爆炸后膨胀形成的。
1927 年，比利时天文学家和宇宙学家勒梅特（Georges
Lemaître）首次提出了宇宙大爆炸假说。
1929 年，美国天文学家哈勃根据假说提出星系的红移量
与星系间的距离成正比的哈勃定律，并推导出星系都在互相
远离的宇宙膨胀说。理论认为宇宙曾有一段从热到冷的演化
史。在这个时期里，宇宙体系在不断地膨胀，使物质密度从
密到稀地演化，如同一次规模巨大的爆炸。该理论的创始人
之一是伽莫夫。
1946 年美国物理学家伽莫夫正式提出大爆炸理论，认为
宇宙由大约 140 亿年前发生的一次大爆炸形成。上世纪末，
对 Ia 超新星的观测显示，宇宙正在加速膨胀，因为宇宙可
能大部分由暗能量组成。
2018 年逝世前 10 天（3 月 14 日逝世）霍金和赫托格发
表《从宇宙永恒膨胀中顺利退出》文章。赫托格强调说： “这
解释了宇宙膨胀是如何开始的。早期宇宙的膨胀解决了一些
主要的谜题，比如宇宙为什么是大的和统一的，而不是完全
一致的。
“膨胀的答案是，近乎均匀性的原因是早期宇宙中暴涨
的量子涨落。”
“今天，我们仍然可以看到这些膨胀的波动的迹象，在
大爆炸的余辉中出现微小的变化——宇宙微波背景，宇宙只
270有 38 万年的时候发出。”——这样，太阳太阳系诞生形成
就不是 40 亿年了，而应该是在“宇宙微波背景，宇宙只有
38 万年的时候发出。”也就是说在宇宙大爆炸后的 38 万年
左右诞生形成的！
第十五章 “生态熵”原力与整体生命学的起源！
一 光和生命
宇宙大爆炸导出太阳太阳系在宇宙大爆炸后的 100 亿年
左右诞生形成的！
那么，为什么现代人科学家在古希腊文明奇迹消失后的
2600 多年之后的 1932 年，量子力学的创始人玻尔在哥本哈
根召开国际辐射疗法会议上，才发表著名演说《光和生命》
呢？！这就是薛定谔《自然与希腊人科学与人文主义》昭示
的历史必然与现代科学起源！
通过对海森堡提出的测不准原理进行哲学思考，指出测
不准原理应该扩展到对生命现象的认识中去！……玻尔在
1962 年 6 月，在科隆实验遗传学研究所的开幕式上再一次作
《再论光和生命》的演讲——可见，现代人科学家研究“ 光
和生命”比希腊人晚 4532 年！……
这就是人类诞生、智能发展晚于宇宙地球万物演化的缘
由吧！
在《再论光和生命》中，玻尔进一步强调说： “我们在
本世纪中曾经亲眼看到了如此非凡的进步。当然，机体中在
271272
实际上可以认为是均匀的那种温度，就将热力学的要求归结
成了自由能的固定不变或稳步递减。因此，看来可以这样假
设 ： 一 切 永 久 出 现 或 暂 时 出 现 的 大 分 子 结 构
（macromolecular structures）的形成，代表着一些本质
上不可逆的过程，这些过程在营养和呼吸所保持的有利条件
下增加着机体的稳定性。当然，正如布瑞顿（Britten）和
伽莫夫（Gamow）近来曾经讨论过的，植物中的光合作用，
也是由全面的熵增过程伴随着的。” ——于是，光合作用
与“熵”成为现代生命科学学起源之前沿！
二
从宇宙大爆炸时间轴看现代人科学家对光合作用本
质与植物生命认识就更晚
1773 年，日内瓦学者约翰·谢内别已经发现了光合作
用。他在自己的小书房里摆设着各种各样盆景花草，并在盆
中安装了几根玻璃管，可以看到浸在水中植物鲜嫩的枝。一
次他随意用细小玻璃管向水中吹气，竟出现了奇妙情景：他
看到植物嫩枝周围布满了银亮的小气泡，密密麻麻的，谢内
别把这些小气泡收集到一个小瓶子里，用冒烟的无明火木柴
接触收集来的气体，立刻迸出火花燃烧，从而证明了植物嫩
枝周围生出的气体是可以燃烧的氧气。谢内别口中吹进的是
二氧化碳，从而证明植物吸入二氧化碳，吐出氧，人类自此
才知道了光合作用对生命的要义。
到了 1946 年，美国化学家麦尔文·卡尔文演示光合作用中碳固着的主要过程，发现了卡尔文——木森反应。卡
尔文以放射性碳-14 作食物供给烧瓶中的绿色小球藻，在不
同间隔的终断中，观察到暂停时间的放射性碳也越来越多，
这就指示了绿色小球藻对碳的吸收。
事实上，光合作用并不是像谢内别认识的那样简单，其
本质是植物细胞内的叶绿素分子俘获太阳光子，叶绿素分子
嵌在细胞膜中，在电子显微镜下观看，可以看到它们以晶体
般的秩序堆积起来，叶绿体平面的卟啉环就像肌红蛋白中的
血红素基团，在其氮爪上抓住一个镁原子；在环上联结着一
根长长的碳链尾巴，分子被调制到一个黄红波长的光子——
太阳光能量的峰值波长——可以使镁原子释放出一个电子，
热电子立刻被一系列细胞色素中的第一个装到带上，这些也
是在爪上抓住铁的卟啉，它们不损失能量地将电子传输到具
有叶绿体的原材料和适当的酶及辅酶的位置。每个电子在这
里都将能量用于生成化学键。在阳光照耀下进行的反应中，
能量首先用于制造 ATP 分子。然后在黑暗中，循环反应将 ATP
的能量变换为糖和葡萄糖中更稳定的键能。这是用于制造许
多细胞的物质，并且也是所需能量来源的原材料——这是一
个三维立体“软性封闭系统”ATP“生态熵”形成与转换的
复杂过程。
科学家证明，光反应中能将照射到叶绿素分子上 75%的
光子能量转，换成 ATP 键中的化学能量， 这是人工通过中
273央电站的原动机将矿物燃料转换为电能比率的两倍。可见，
叶绿素体利用光能的高效率远远超出了人们的想象，是人类
智慧无法达到的。
从星球生态学看，覆盖整个地球的绿色植物细胞中的
叶绿素，悄悄把光能转换为生物能，是太地能量循环的初始
点，它的广泛和高比率能量转换，还承负着氧和二氧化碳的
循环！可见绿色植物的奉献是无私的，叶绿素的能量产品不
仅仅是对光能的利用，它最的终结果是生产了空气含量稀少
的碳，使植物含碳量达到 40%以上，并为动物的存在和繁殖，
提供了所必需的食物、营养、能量。可见，植物在地球生命
环链上不可替代的重要作用，这自然而然导出植物先于动物
在地球出现。
三 光的本性与以太量子属性
“假若没有能够利用太阳能生产出人类生存所必需
的基本食物的植物的话，人类将无法生存。”——卡森
现代人科学家认为，光合作用在地球植物出现最早的
证明是大约在 35 亿年前。
1980 年，肖普在澳大利亚西北荒漠，称“北极”的沙
漠热点附近的古老沉积岩中，发现了光合作用的细菌证据，
在沉积岩层能看到无数的光合作用的蓝细胞所造成的像细
丝织成的垫子状的叠层。化石证据让我们不得不承认在 35
亿年前，或更早（应该是 100 亿年左右），活的细胞就已经
274生活在空气和水中，进行着光合作用，进行着碳与氧的两大
循环，进行着太地能量循环……
那么，光的本性又是什么呢！？
《牛顿光学》早在 1704 年就提出光的弯曲
光谱是牛顿上三一学院在 1665 年伦敦大瘟疫放假，回乡在
1666 年 1 月，提出了色彩理论，发现折射理论、七色光——
牛顿利用三棱镜把太阳光分解成彩色光谱,并做了色光混合
实验。 牛顿为说明日光的成分而制作了牛顿色盘。圆板分
为七个扇形,依次涂有红、橙、黄、绿、蓝、靛、紫七种颜
色。将圆板迅速转动,可见到板呈白色,说明日光是由以上七
种色光合成的。
又因为牛顿提出的“粒子说”受到权威胡克反对，一直
到 1703 年胡克世长辞。第二年，牛顿才有机会发表这部巨
著。
牛顿《光学》的全名是《光学或光的反射、折射、弯
曲与颜色的论述》（也就是说，光的弯曲最早是牛顿《光学》
提出来的，并不是爱因斯坦的专利！）
牛顿在《光学》序言写道：
牛顿说： “为了避免对这些论点的无谓争论，我推迟了
这部书的公开发行，如果没有朋友们的敦促，可能还要推迟
一段时间。”
光的本质在《牛顿光学》1704 年就确定光的“粒子说”
275理论，其本质就是量子学说。却为科学家长期忽视。一直到
1900 年普朗克拨乱反正才得到主流科学承认……这已经是
300 年以后的事了；人类科学家才从牛顿光谱和达.芬奇“视
觉形象主体”确认“可见光”的严格波长范围限制（人眼只
能看见“可见光”）：
【1、红光：波长范围：760~622 纳米；
2、橙光：波长范围：622~597 纳米；
3、黄光：波长范围：597~577 纳米；
4、绿光：波长范围：577~492 纳米；
5、青光：波长范围：492~450 纳米；
6、蓝光：波长范围：450~435 纳米；
7、紫光：波长范围：435~390 纳米；
宇宙大爆炸就表达了光的本性是“电磁波”是量子（“大
爆炸后 1011 秒（104 年），温度约为 105 开尔文，物质期。
在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形式。”），可见光是
电磁波谱中人眼可以感知的部分，可见光谱没有精确的范
围；一般人的眼睛可以感知的电磁波的波长在 400～760nm
之间，但还有一些人能够感知到波长大约在 380～780nm 之
间的电磁波。
276277
四
光的粒子与波动源彰显“量子纠缠”
从牛顿《光学》三棱镜色散“光谱”与光速，都是大自
然宇宙共有的属性，已经追朔到可见光极限从今天的回头
看，事实上，普朗克运用了麦克斯韦方程组整合前历史科学
家的成果之方法论；当时瑞利－金斯公式在短波方面得出同
黑体辐射光谱实验结果相违背的结论，维恩公式则仅适用于
黑体辐射光谱能量分布的短波部分……这种反向借鉴显示，
必须找到一个能够成功描述整个实验曲线的黑体辐射公式，
通过深刻思考普朗克，在黑体被加热温度超 2800 度出现反
常态现象从小孔发射出电磁波切入，反反复复实验并作出两
个假设偶然诞生的奇迹……连普朗克自己都没有想到，竟创
造了彻底改变传统物理学的世纪性前无古人后无来者的奇
迹。
根据“大爆炸后 1011 秒（104 亿年），温度约为 105
开尔文，物质期。在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形278
式。”现代人科学家发现的量子力学就与宇宙大爆炸后
（1011 秒（104 亿年）诞生，自然而然存在“量子纠缠”秘
籍的神秘隐藏！
五
光照与土壤在宇宙大爆炸后 104 亿年-30 万年形
成
“大爆炸后 1011 秒（104 亿年），温度约为 105 开尔文，
物质期。在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形式。”——
也就是说，在 143 亿年前的 104 亿年时， “光主宰着各能量
形式” ；土壤形成与光密切相关，确实是一个漫长的宇宙演
化历史过程。
鉴于“大爆炸后 30 万年后：约 3000 度，化学结合作用
使中性原子形成”地表岩石首先裸露，在光照、风吹、雨淋、
冰冻和宇宙冷却等作用下而发生本质变化，形成大小不等、
形状各异的矿质颗粒，我们叫 “成土母质”。岩石风化为
母质，为低等生物的生长提供了条件。成土母质进一步在自
然成土因素生物、气候、地形和时间的作用下，逐渐释放和
积累了各种养分，逐渐形成了自然土壤……
六
大爆炸土壤与生命相得益彰创造物与人类农业人工选
择渐渐出现形成
卡森对土壤描述得很奇美，也很轻松浪漫。她说： “像
补丁一样覆盖着大陆薄层控制着我们人类和大地上各种动
物的生存。如我们所知，若没有土壤，陆地植物不能生长；而没有植物，动物就无法生活。
如果说我们的以农业为基础的生活依然依赖于土壤的
话，那么同样真实的是，土壤也依赖于生命；土壤本身的起
源及其所保持的天然特征都与活的动、植物有亲密的关系。
因为，土壤在一定程度上是生命的创造物，它产生于很久以
前生物与非生物之间的奇异相互作用。当火山爆发出炽热的
岩流时，当奔腾于陆地光秃秃的岩石上的水流磨损了甚至最
坚硬的花岗石时；当冰霜严寒劈裂和破碎了岩石时，原始的
成土物质就开始得到聚集。然后，生物开始了它们奇迹般的
创造，一点一点地使这些无生命的物质变成了土壤。岩石的
第一个覆盖物——地衣，利用它们的酸性分泌物促进了花岗
岩的风化作用，从而为其他生命造就了栖息的地方。藓类在
原始土壤的微小空隙中坚持生长，这种土壤是由地衣的碎
屑，微小昆虫的外壳和起源于大海的一系列动物的碎片所组
成的。
生命（细菌）创造了土壤，而异常丰富多彩的生命物质
也生存于土壤之中，否则，土壤就会成为一种死亡和贫瘠的
东西了，正是由于土壤中无数有机体的存在和活动，才使土
壤能给大地披上绿色的外衣。
土壤置身于无休无止的循环之中，这使它总是处于持续
变化的状态。当岩石遭受风化时，当有机物腐烂时，当氮及
其他气体随雨水从天而降时，新物质就不断被引进土壤中来
279了。同时，另外有一些物质被从土壤中取走了，它们是被生
物因暂时需用而借走的，微妙的，非常重要的化学变化不断
地发生在这样一个过程中，在此过程中，来自空气和水中的
元素被转换为宜于植物利用的形式。在所有这些变化中，活
的有机体总是积极的参与者。”
——这段研究土壤生命的深度描述，几乎是对土壤最优美的
赞美诗！这里，没有学术的专业术语和化学方程式；这里，
没有地质变迁的学术讨论；这里，没有对细菌和昆虫、对土
壤耕耘的分析……可这里，已经把这所有一切都全部涵概
了，这真是土壤生态学的最优美的表达！是啊！“没有哪些
研究能比探知生存于黑暗的土壤之中的生物的巨大数量问
题更令人迷惑了，同时也更易于被忽视的了。关于土壤有机
体之间彼此制约的情况以及土壤有机体与地下环境，地上环
境相制约的情况我们也还只知道一点点。”
卡森有尊重事实的严谨，敢于挑战陈腐观念的大无畏勇
气，让我们深刻地认识到土壤的特征：
一、土壤是生物之本，生命五界都不能离开土壤。
二、生命存在土壤，生命与土壤相互作用，才有了土壤
活的生命力。
三、土壤来自漫长的岩石风化，土壤肥力是有机体无私
奉献。微生物和昆虫在地下默默的勤劳耕作。
四、对于微观生态的细节之微妙和土壤的微生态……我
280281
们还“只知道一点点”！
让我们无限深情地对海洋生物学家卡森的早夭表达痛心
和惋惜吧！……
七
卡森研究证明微生物史前存在与土壤形成和神秘起源
相得益彰
现代人科学家和地质学家认为，化石之门微生物创生于
40 亿年！
对于微生物、土壤与宇宙大爆炸密切的关联，卡森描绘
得十分精微细致，她说：
“细菌、真菌和藻类是使动物、植物的残体还原为组成
它们的无机质。假若没有这些微小生物，像碳、氧这些化学
元素通过土壤，空气以及生物组织的巨大循环运动是无法进
行的。例如若没固氮细菌，虽然植物被含氮的空气‘海洋’
所包围，氮它们仍将难以得到氮气素。其他有机体产生了二
氧化碳并形成碳酸而促进了岩石的分解。土壤中还有其他的
微生物在促成着多种多样的氧化还原反应，通过这些反应使
铁、锰和硫这样一些矿物质发生转移，并变成植物可以吸收
的状态。”……
“另外，以惊人数量存在的还有微小的螨类和被称为跃
尾虫的没有翅膀的原始昆虫。尽管它们很小，却在除掉枯枝
败叶和促使森林地面碎屑慢慢转化为土壤的过程中起着重
要作用。其中一些小生物在完成它们任务的过程中所具有的特征几乎是令人难以置信的。”
可见“土壤中生命包括有从细菌到哺乳动物的全部生
物……使土壤中充满湿气，并促进水分在整个植物生长层的
疏排和渗透。”
看到了吧！，卡森认为其中最重要的一点就是：土壤的
微生态！——水在土壤中的虹吸、疏排和渗透。土壤像海绵
一样吸收水分和容纳溶质。这样。物质才能熔于水，水中才
能存在各种化学物质，原子、离子才能极普遍地分布在土壤
的微小颗粒中，产生随机分子化合分解土壤的这种特征，才
能秉承水道无形的活力，形成生命奇异的宇宙地球广宇“本
生通道”。本生通道的广宇性是隐秘在宇宙地球人们肉眼看
不见的，效力极强的通道；土壤里有什么化学物质的原子、
离子，植物根系的细胞就有什么化学物质的原子、离子。因
为原子和离子都是小尺度 10-9——10-10 米的粒子，往往能
创造神奇的生物元素“供应链”。事实上，土壤中的任何污
染原，都可以随着土壤与水的蒸发进入空气，进入海阔天空
的大气，宇宙生物呼吸的大生命场；这是宇宙大爆炸“整体
生命学”无处不在的“生态熵”宇宙原力；才得以实现薛定
谔的“生命以负熵为生”！
八 地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论①
地球是一个奇特的行星，是至今唯一存在生命的星球。
人类生活在地球上；人类必须靠“负熵”生存下去——这就
282是食物（动物和植物）；按食物链动物吃植物来思考，植物
生长在土壤上，地球表面必须存在植被，才能有“光合作用” ；
那么，地球植被是如何形成的呢？
现代人类教科书说“很久之前地球上已经有了单细胞的
植物，也就是菌类与藻类。此时植物只有一个细胞，生长生
活只是依靠环境中的营养物质，之后才逐渐演变成能自养的
植物。植物的演化过程，基本上分为菌藻时代、裸厥时代、
蕨类植物时代、裸子植物时代、被子植物时代。”
那么，如何放到宇宙大爆炸整体生命学中来解释地球植
被的形成呢！？
这里，教科书对植被诞生的阐述必须修正，特别是时间
必须大大提前到 100 亿年前；因为细菌诞生在 40-46 亿年只
是考古学家得到化石证明的结论——【2017 年 3 月“据西班
牙《国家报》3 月 1 日报道，一个由伦敦、美国和挪威等国
的地质学家、古生物学家和纳米科学家组成的国际团队日前
在加拿大魁北克省北部哈德森湾的 Nuvvuagittuq 绿石带上
发现了一些距今 37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿年的细菌化石，地球诞
生至今 45 亿年，因此此次发现的细菌化石被认为是迄今已
知最古老的生命证据。”】，这里，地球的诞生同样必须修
正到 130 亿年左右的瞬间“时间窗”——宇宙大爆炸时间轴
线的黄金分割点上。
九 地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论②
2832022 年詹姆斯.韦伯太空望远镜在宇宙大爆炸始初已
经捕捉到了 131 亿年存在“气体” 、 “阳光” 、 “水”确切
证明：
1、气体：
2022 年 7 月 11 日发布的韦伯太空望远镜拍摄到地球约
“2000 光年的南环星云，图像展示了这一行星状星云的全
貌；还有位于飞马座的斯蒂芬五重星系，图像揭示了该星系
的超大质量黑洞附近气体的速度和成分。”也就是说，宇宙
“气体”在宇宙大爆炸初始就已经出现；
有一张彩图是距离地球 7600 光年的船底座星云， “图
像呈现了其最早期、快速形成的阶段。船底座星云，是天空
中最大、最亮的星云之一，拥有许多比太阳质量大得多的恒
星，也是银河系中的一个恒星形成区，新生的恒星和它们组
成的星团被包裹在大量的气体和尘埃中间。照片中的很多星
点，就是正在诞生中的恒星。”揭示“星团被包裹在大量的
气体和尘埃中间”——这两张图都展视“气体”大量存在！
那么“阳光”呢！？
2、阳光：
恒星外侧气体包则高速抛离，所显现的绝对光度可超过
太阳光度 100 亿倍。分析特定类型的超新星爆发，珀尔马特、
里斯和施密特所属的研究小组发现，超过 50 颗超新星所显
现的光度比先前预期暗淡。对这一结果的解释，是宇宙正在
284加速扩张——“太阳光度 100 亿倍”！也就是说，在宇宙大
爆炸的 131 亿年就有了“阳光”！
对微生物菌毒来说，阳光、气体之外，还必须有“水份”！
3、水：
韦伯望远镜通过携带的近红外成像仪和无狭缝光谱仪
（NIRISS）对 WASP-96 b 的大气层进行了有史以来最详细的
近红外透射光谱，其中明确发现大气层之中存在水的证据。
也就是说，詹姆斯.韦伯太空望远镜在宇宙大爆炸始
初捕捉到了 131 亿年存在“气体” 、 “阳光” 、 “水”确切
证明！——这样，微生物菌毒在宇宙的存在就应该和宇宙大
爆炸的 131 亿年同步（也许在未来 10 年詹姆斯.韦伯望远镜
发回的更多信息图片会得到更充分的说明。）
十 地球植被的形成必须符合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论③
我们说过宇宙大爆炸整体生命学的关键的“生态熵”有
四：
【“生态熵”要素有四：
阳光、水、空气、食物。
因为地球是一个活的巨大生物体——柏拉图，地球诞生
以来，水与陆地的比就是 7:3——地球名副其实是巨大的水
球。鉴此，地球上所有生物体的水含量均在 7：3 的范围之
间；水不被细胞吸收，就不能参与人体（生物体）一系列生
命代谢活动，生命就不复存在，】
285从詹姆斯.韦伯太空望远镜色彩图可以明确看到光、水、
气体：
●仅是在这一张照片中，就有成千上万个星系。其中，
有的星系发出的光芒，甚至来自于 130 亿年前。
据科学家推测，宇宙的诞生距今也仅约 137 亿年。
●系外行星 WASP-96 b（光谱图）
韦伯对太阳系外这颗又热又膨胀的行星进行了详细观
察，揭示了 WASP-96 b 大气中存在显著的水蒸气。
而光谱中所记录的数值波动还反映出行星大气中含有
云和霾的特征。
●斯蒂芬五重奏星系
对于这一非常紧凑的星系群，韦伯，穿透了围绕一个
星系中心的尘埃罩，揭示了其超大质量黑洞附近气体
的速度和成分。
这些确切来自 137 亿年的彩图已经真实反馈了宇宙大爆
炸就存在“生态熵”四要素，所以宇宙大爆炸和整体生命学
在宇宙大爆炸过程中是密切关联、不能分割的一个整体。鉴
此， “河外星系是很复杂的天体系统，它的光是它的各组成
部分发出光的总和。因此，当把河外星系作为整体进行分光
286287
研究时，拍到的光谱是它所有轨道组成部分的光谱的叠加。
显然，组成部分不同，河外星系的光谱也不同。河外星系的
组成和与它的类型是相关的，因此，不同类型的累积光谱是
不同的。椭圆星系的累积光谱型最晚，大致相当于 K 型。”
“星系内的恒星在运动，星系该身也有自转，星系整体
在空间同样在运动。”——由此证明：宇宙大爆炸整体生命
学完全是行星、星系之间的相互作用，使宇宙地球生命客观
世界形成一个有机整体，并处于不断地运动和变化发展中！
十 一
宇宙大爆炸行星地球广宇原力“本生通道”
通过宇宙大爆炸形成主体生命作用在宇宙地球进行广
宇微观物交换的网络路径叫本生通道。因为这一通道是本生
发现的，则叫“本生通道”。这是宇宙大爆炸“整体生命学”
概念。
事实上，宇宙地球广宇因为宇宙大爆炸普遍存在微观物
资交换的网络路径，这是不争的事实；源于“大爆炸后 30
万年后：约 3000 度，化学结合作用使中性原子形成，宇宙
主要成分为气态物质，并逐步在自引力作用下凝聚成密度较
高的气体云块，直至恒星和恒星系统。”
那么，什么是本生通道呢？
因为德国梅德尔的化学教授罗勃特·本生最早用科学
实验方法真实地发现了一种实验室用灯--本生灯。本生灯点
燃可发出极高热量的火焰，本生把盐粒、煤屑、金属屑放在火焰上燃烧，他发现每一种物质在燃烧中会发出自己特有的
光。像金属钠永远发出黄色火焰，钾发出紫色火焰……于是
他发现了一种极简单，极迅速的物质分析方法；但是，因钾
盐、钠盐、锂盐都发出相同的黄色火焰，无法区分。使本生
遇到了难题。此时梅得堡的物理学教授基尔霍夫，利用三棱
镜能分析光的性质，把本生灯上各种物质的火焰分解成各不
相同的光谱特性，从而发明了一种新仪器--分光仪。当本生
灯的光线射到分光仪的三棱镜上，可看到钾盐、锂盐、钠盐
的屑在火焰里燃烧时，每一种物质的火焰都发出不同的由几
条不同颜色带组成的光谱。比如钠的光谱只含有一 条黄色
线条。钾的紫色火焰有三条：两条红一条紫色……这样光谱
分析便能把各种不同物质区别开来，并能察出一千万分之一
毫克钠的含量。于是本生用这种方法，观察各种物质。他在
一块岩石中发现了微量的锂，这岩石的裂缝生长着一棵灌
木，本生想这灌木从岩石吸收营养，它的叶子必然含有锂，
本生把树叶放到灯上燃烧，果然发出了锂特有的光谱（有一
条极鲜明的红线和一条朦胧的橘黄色线条）。本生把树叶送
给一头乳牛吃，并把牛乳放在灯焰燃烧，同样发现了锂光谱；
本生又把一杯牛乳给养牛的主人喝了，从养牛主人的一滴血
里，他看到了鲜明的红色线条和旁边朦胧的橘黄色线条，证
明锂已进入养牛主人的血液里。本生用实验发现并证明了大
自然宇宙地球存在广宇生命场普遍的物流通道--本身通道。
288本生通道揭示了一个大自然秘蜜：宇宙地球任何物质都
有进出任何球域生物个体细胞的能力，有形的物种个体生命
与无形的物流通道是永远相通的，这是宇宙能量微循环的
“通道效应” ，宇宙大爆炸广宇网络物流属性是“生命熵”
无处不在的秘籍。
十二 宇宙大爆炸之初的负能量熵循环-“太地循环”
什么是熵循环太地循环呢？
宇宙广宇能量（物质）在宇宙太阳与地球、地下的往复
循环，我们称作太地能量循环。简称：太地循环。
宇宙大爆炸有证据证明， “大爆炸后 30 万年后：约 3000
度，化学结合作用使中性原子形成，宇宙主要成分为气态物
质，并逐步在自引力作用下凝聚成密度较高的气体云块，直
至恒星和恒星系统。”——“宇宙主要成分为气态物质”是
形成“太地能量循环”物流网络必然！
古希腊科学家在 2400 年前就感悟到，亚里士多德说：
轻微的地震来自于地球内部的风吹出洞穴，而严重的地震则
是由吹入地下洞窟的大风造成的。不管这种解释是否符合现
代人的观点，这已经说明古代先哲已经认识到风能吹入地
球，风也能吹出地球。这就是古代希腊人朴实的太地能量循
环说。
我们总结示意太地循环图：
289290
十三
宇宙大爆炸自然形成了行星星系多
元广宇“负能量”熵微循环自然出现太地循环
太地循环是宇宙大爆炸自然形成的广宇“负能量”效应：
太阳的能量，通过阳光照射在绿色植物上，植物吸收空气中的二氧化碳，通过叶绿素作用，把二氧化碳分解为碳和氧。
碳与植物体内的水分起化学变化，成为碳水化合物，留做植
物本身的营养料，氧放出，又回到空气中，这就是光合作用。
有证据表明，在光反应中将照射到叶绿素分子上 75%的
光子能量转换为 ATP 键中的化学能量，这是通过中央电站的
原动机将矿物燃料转换为电能比率的两倍，其光-化学能转
换效应十分巨大。
光合作用把光能转化为生物能，植物是动物的食物，动
物、植物和微生物共同构成宇宙生态能。死亡的动植物尸骸，
进入土壤，转换成能基质，由水和细菌作用进入地质层序，
沉积，在板块运动过程中，形成地球地质生态位，在成岩运
动的过程中，富集形成石油、气、煤（碳氢化合物），石油
滋润、营养着地球地质生态（位），润滑板块运动，作为地
球内部能量的一种补充，普遍存在于岩石结构的各个层序，
再随地球生态运动的火山、地震、地表缝隙泄露，回到地面，
或从河网水系浮出，进入大气……以各种形式使碳氢化合物
返回地表……
事实上，很大部分能量被太阳悄悄回收。完成了从太阳
到地球，又从地球地下到太阳宇宙的能量循环-太地能量循
环。这种时时刻刻永远相互往复的循环，就形成了亘古至今
宇宙能量循环的一个重要环节。太地能量循环是宇宙能量循
环不可或缺的环节，是经验、也是宇宙大爆炸形成的事实与
291292
证明。
十四
宇宙大爆炸赋予太阳系行星星系相同的化学元
素组成
太地能量循环存在一个前提条件，即构成宇宙、行星、
太阳系、星系的氢、氧、氦、碳等……元素与构成地球内无
机物和地球上、大气层中无机物，与构成所有生命体的氢、
氧、氦、碳等……元素必须是相同的！现代人科学家利用光
谱仪将可见光和频率高与频率低的紫外线及红外线的几百
万条光谱线编成目录。光谱学的证据表明最遥远的宇宙和地
球一样，是由相同的化学元素组成，只是组成的比例不同。
地球上所有生命物也都是由相同元素构成，同样地球和宇宙
相同的化学元素组成，这从本生实验也能得到证明，并且物
质能量互换的每一事件都可在波谱表中某个位置上表示出
来，这就为太地能量循环提供了元素广普可循环性的保证与
事实。
从“太地能量循环”图，我们可以明显看出，太阳也
在悄悄吸收能量，这有很多自然现象可以证明。比如：光在
辐射时的惯性力受到太阳质量曳引现象，表现出太阳的引力
吸收能量。在地面上，太阳的白光都被吸收，以热的形式重
新辐射出去。植物的叶子在光合作用的同时，把未被吸收的
太阳光再发射出去，其中最强的是绿色波长。叶子的花朵，
颜料和染料，金子和银子的原子与分子有选择地再辐射太阳光中某些频率的光，被人感觉到的就是光谱的颜色，这是对
太阳光的反射；以及水蒸气蒸发的虹吸现象，空气中晶莹的
小水珠……所有物质都在把太阳光悄悄反射回去。所以，这
是一个完整的宇宙大爆炸创造的太地能量循环模式。
光合作用在地球内最早的证明，大约在 135 亿年前。
虽然在 1980 年，肖普在澳大利亚西北荒漠，称“北极”
的沙漠热点附近的古老沉积岩中，发现了光合作用的细菌证
据，在沉积岩层能看到无数的光合作用的蓝细胞所造成的像
细丝织成的垫子状的叠层。化石证据让我们不得不承认在
100 亿年前，或更早，活的细胞就已经生活在空气和水中，
进行着光合作用，进行着碳与氧的两大循环，进行着太地能
量循环，只有产生地质灾难性（对生命来说）海陆变迁才能
产生大量化石……
十五 宇宙大爆炸过程宇宙中“热力学第二定律”无序
耗散或熵的总量总是随着时间的推移而增加
我想稍微推测一下宇宙中生命的发展，特别是智慧生命
的发展。我将把人类也包括在此，尽管人类在整个历史中的
很多行为都是相当愚蠢的，并未顾及其他物种的存活。我将
要讨论的两个问题是， “宇宙中其他地方存在生命的概率是
多少？”“生命在未来可能会如何发展？”
随着时间的推移，事情变得更加混乱和混沌，这是大家
共同的经验。这种观测甚至有其自己的定律，即所谓的热力
293学第二定律。这个定律是说，宇宙中的无序或熵的总量总是
随着时间的推移而增加。不过，定律仅指无序总量。一个物
体的秩序可以增加，只要其周围的无序量增加得更多即可。
这就是在生物中发生的事情。我们可以将生命定义为一
个有序的系统，该系统可以维持其对抗无序的倾向，并能复
制自身。也就是说，它可以造出类似但独立的有序系统。要
完成这些，系统必须把某种有序形式的能量，例如食物、阳
光或电力转变成热的形式的无序的能量。以这种方式，系统
就可以在满足总的无序量增加的要求的同时，它自身和它的
后代有序量增加。
最终他们将开始相互吸引，并将在一次大挤压中聚集在一
起。这将是宇宙历史在实时间中的终结。
我们在阿诺·彭齐亚斯和罗伯特·威尔逊发现的微波
背景中观察到宇宙的一个显著特征。它本质上是宇宙在非常
年轻时的场景的一种化石记录。这个背景几乎是相同的，不
管我们往哪个方向看。不同方向之间的差异约为十万分之
一。这些差异不可思议的小，而需要给予解释。对这种光滑
性的普遍被接受的解释是，在宇宙历史的极早期，它经历过
一个急剧膨胀的时期，宇宙膨胀了至少一千亿亿亿倍。这个
过程被称为暴胀。与过于经常折磨我们的通货膨胀形成对
比，暴胀对于宇宙是个好东西。如果这就是它的全部故事，
那么微波辐射在四面八方都会是完全一样的。那么这微小的
294295
差异来自何处？
十六
宇宙大爆炸遵循物理学定律 NAPN 俯视平面图
NAPN 图：【在 143 亿年的一个奇，一刹那发生大爆炸；大爆炸后
10-43 秒（普朗克时间）：约 1032 度，宇宙从量子涨落背景
出现，这个阶段称为普朗克时间。
此前，宇宙的密度可能超过每立方厘米 1094 克，超过
296质子密度 1078 倍，物理学上所有的力都是一种。（超对称）
在这个阶段，宇宙已经冷却到引力可以分离出来，开始独立
存在，存在传递引力相互作用的引力子。宇宙中的其他力
（强、弱相互作用和电磁相互作用）仍为一体】——现代人
科学家在希腊人的科学基础上，不断发现的科学成果可以综
述为 NAPN 图——俯视平面图中心是大爆炸“奇点” 、四方
形是宇宙大爆炸、光速；圆圈是无边际宇宙大爆炸疆域；圈
外多元循环是宇宙大爆炸遵循的物理学定律【大爆炸后 1011
秒（104 年），温度约为 105 开尔文，物质期。在宇宙早期
历史中，光主宰着各能量形式。随着宇宙膨胀，电磁辐射的
波长被拉长，相应光子能量也跟着减小。辐射能量密度与尺
度（R）和体积（4πR3/3）的乘积成反比例减小，即安 1/R4
减小，而物质的能量密度只是简单地与体积成 1/R3 反比例
减小。一万年后，物质密度追上辐射密度且超越它，从那时
起，宇宙和它的动力学开始为物质所主导。】——人类最早
发现宇宙学是 1452 年哥白尼《天体运行论》之哥白尼宇宙
学原理、接下来 1596 年开普勒发表《宇宙的奥秘》发现了
行星运动（三）定律，还原宇宙和谐之终极真理；
1687 年，牛顿在《自然哲学的数学原理》提出万有引力
定律，牛顿揭示： “任何物体之间都存在引力” ；作为大爆
炸宇宙“开始独立存在，存在传递引力相互作用的引力子。”
哈雷应用万有引力定律计算确认 1758 年哈雷彗星将如期出
297298
现，证明每 76.1 年环绕太阳一周！
1900 年 12 月 14 日，普朗克在德国物理学会上作《论正
常光谱中的能量分布》报告，激动地阐述了自己最惊人的发
现说：为了从理论上得出正确的辐射公式，必须假定物质辐
射（或吸收）的能量并有著名的普朗克公式ε=hv，其中 h
为普朗克常数 h=6.63×10^-34，史称为普朗克常数，这一结
果，成为量子论诞生和新物理学革命新纪元到来；
1910 年爱因斯坦广义相对论方程式
E = mc 2……
这里，还必须必须提到玻尔电子模型：
①、在所有力学上可能的电子绕核运动之中，只有电子
的动量矩 P 等于量 n/2π的整数倍的那些轨道运动才是稳定
的，即：
P=n h/2π
②、电子在上述假设所许可的任一轨道上运动时，原子
具有一定的能量 Wn，而不会发出光来，这称为稳定运动状态。
③、只有原子从一个具有较大能量 Wn 的稳定运动状态
过渡到另一个较低能量 Wk 的稳定运动状态时，原子发射出
单色光，它的频率是：
vkn = Wn/h –Wk/h
玻尔的学生海森堡，切入和运用互补原理，找到了
经典力学对应的量子力学各种对应量与对应关系，发现
和建立了“矩阵力学” ；299
1933 年，薛定谔受玻尔互补原理影响发现了量子力
学基本方程：薛定谔方程，被誉“发现了在原子理论里
很有用的新形式”……
这些现代人伟大科学家历时 3000 年前仆后继完成的物
理学定律，在宇宙大爆炸初始就出现在宇宙大爆炸基因密码
信息，全天候有效维系 143 亿年宇宙大爆炸的不同时段展示
“上帝确实是在掷骰子”！
十七
宇宙大爆炸超级速率释放能量方程式-Q-J 方程
孟德尔遗传方阵“∵
= 3:1 ” ，揭示了
斐波那契数列和马尔萨斯《人口论》繁殖超级 2N 几
何基数隐含着宇宙大爆炸数理级数——因为：斐波那
契数列 13、21、34、55……是通过加某一自然数来完
成的，有人为选择。大自然不会有这样人为的自然数
列！如：
3x4 二 12; +1 二 13
Sx4=20; + I 二 21
8 x4 二 32;+2 二 34
13x4 二 52; +3 二 55……
易方程 2 n = 2、4、8、16……2 n几何数列基数不能产
生宇宙大爆炸和生命奇点大爆发或者突然灭绝数理300
超级速率效应。
只有 W=
×4 n符合孟德尔原理的哈维小宇
宙体系几何数理级数，又因为大宇宙体系和小宇宙体
系物理学定律的同效性，宇宙大爆炸诞生整体生命
学，Q-J 方程必然出自宇宙大爆炸纪元；这一论断得
到 Víctor M. Rivilla 博士最新观测证明说： “在这
在我们银河系的中心发现了大量的 RNA 前体”——
【"西班牙国家研究委员会和西班牙国家航空航天技
术研究所的天体生物学家 Víctor Rivilla 解释说："
在这里我们表明，在星际介质中发生的化学反应能够
有效地形成多种腈类化合物，它们是'RNA 世界'情景
的关键分子前体。】
里维拉说： “G+0.693-0.027 的化学成分与我们
银河系中其他恒星形成区域的化学成分相似，也与太
阳系物体如彗星的化学成分相似。 ”通过仔细研究和
分析 G+0.693-0.027 的发射特征，里维拉和他的同事
确定了一系列的腈类物质，包括氰酸、氰烯、丙炔氰
化物和氰丙炔。他们还试探性地检测了氰甲醛和乙
腈……
现代人天体生物学家 Izaskun Jiménez-Serra 解301
释说："到目前为止，我们已经检测到了几种简单的
核糖核苷酸的前体，即 RNA 的构建块，"他也来自西
班牙国家研究委员会和国家航空航天技术研究所。
霍金说： “宇宙大爆炸核心的巨大神秘之处在于，
解释不可思议的巨大的、拥有空间和能量的整个宇宙
如何能无中生有。其秘密在于我们的宇宙最奇怪的一
个事实。物理定律要求存在某种叫作‘负能量’的东
西。 ”
【那么今天这些负能量在哪里呢？它在我们宇
宙食谱中的第三种成分中：它在空间中。这可能听起
来很奇怪，但根据引力和运动的自然定律——科学中
最古老的那些定律——空间本身就是一个巨大的负
能量仓库，足以确保一切加起来为零。】——霍金《十
问沉思录》
十八
宇宙大爆炸理论的孟德尔“3:1”数理与
万有引力定律平方反比
对比宇宙大爆炸理论【大爆炸后1011秒（104 年），
温度约为 105 开尔文，物质期。在宇宙早期历史中，
光主宰着各能量形式。随着宇宙膨胀，电磁辐射的波
长被拉长，相应光子能量也跟着减小。辐射能量密度
与尺度（R）和体积（4πR3/3）的乘积成反比例减小，
即安 1/R4 减小，而物质的能量密度只是简单地与体302
积成 1/R3 反比例减小。一万年后，物质密度追上辐
射密度且超越它，从那时起，宇宙和它的动力学开始
为物质所主导。】可以确认牛顿万有引力定律的核心
“平方反比”出自宇宙大爆炸【辐射能量密度与尺度
（R）和体积（4πR3/3）的乘积成反比例减小，即安
1/R4 减小，而物质的能量密度只是简单地与体积成
1/R3 反比例减小】之平方反比；
这里，宇宙大爆炸超级速率【物质的能量密度只
是简单地与体积成 1/R3 反比例减小】显示出孟德尔
遗传方阵的“3:1”数理，早就在宇宙种大爆炸初始
存在并彰显无穷威力。
孟德尔遗传方阵 3:1 数理宇宙大爆炸释放能量速
率演绎
W=
×4 n
∵
= 3:1
∴W =（3 ：1）× 4 n
展开：
W =3×4 n ：1×4 nN 为自然数 1、2、3……
N=1 时 w=12:4
N=2 时 w=48:16 依 次 是 192:48 、 768:192 、
3072:768………它们分别为 4 方阵、16 方阵等等——
只有宇宙大爆炸才能有这样迅猛异常“方阵”宇宙大
爆炸“负能量仓库”式全方位释放！彰显 W =（3 ：1）
× 4 n——宇宙大爆炸 Q-J 方程式释放负能量的无穷
威力。
十九 宇宙大爆炸原力数控演化痕迹与狮身人面像“瘦
身”痕的蛛丝马迹现代解密
1843 年沙皇俄国侵犯埃及时掠夺了一部分狮身
人面石像，石像从赤道的古埃及迁移到北纬 60 度列
宁格勒博物馆。经历了一百多年到 20 世纪 80 年 代，
有一位学者来到列宁格勒博物馆，他站到一座狮身人
面像前仔细反复、前后观察，不可思议地感叹说： “ 这
石像变得消瘦起来。 ”
这话被旁边的管理员听到很不高兴反问到： “它
消瘦了你有什么根据吗？”
原来这位学者长期研究过这座狮身人面像的档
案，从记载和它现在的身高、身宽、腰围、颈粗、对
比看，今天的石像已变得瘦小许多。于是管理员述说
了石像的秘密：在清扫地的面时经常发现石像周围有
303些粉末状尘屑，今冬天最为严重，粉末中常有一些细
碎的沙砾，只见石像消瘦但对这种现象谁也无法解
释……
让我们运用宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论讨论一
下这种“廋身”现象。在宇宙大爆炸初始，根据霍金
《十问沉思录》说，【大爆炸产生了大量的正能量，
它同时也产生同样多的负能量。通过这种方式，正的
和负的加起来总是为零。这是自然的另一个定律。
那么今天这些负能量在哪里呢？它在我们宇宙
食谱中的第三种成分中：它在空间中。这可能听起来
很奇怪，但根据引力和运动的自然定律——科学中最
古老的那些定律——空间本身就是一个巨大的负能
量仓库，足以确保一切加起来为零。】假设这座狮身
人面像起源于宇宙地球形成的一原力结构，经历宇宙
大爆炸仍然保留了大爆炸的“负能量” ，成为生命的
一个物种的个体，于是狮身人面像就同样进入了生态
能旋线网络状态的自然选择的游戏规则中——石像
周围的地面上的一层层粉末和夹杂的沙粒正是遗留
的宇宙大爆炸原力的作用与时间风化结果；因为宇宙
大爆炸“只有两种类型的波可以穿越宇宙，为我们提
供有关遥远事物的信息：电磁波（包括光线、X 射线、
伽马射线、微波、射电波……）和引力波。电磁波由
304以光速传播的振荡电力和磁力组成。它们撞击带电粒
子，例如无线电或电视天线中的电子，它们来回摇动
粒子，在粒子中卸下波携带的信息。然后该信息可被
放大并馈送到扬声器或电视屏幕以供人们理解——
这是人类唯一和遥远宇宙认识和信息沟通无形渠
道。 ”
这样，我们把“狮身人面像”作为一个生命个体，
放到“它们撞击带电粒子，例如无线电或电视天线中
的电子，它们来回摇动粒子，在粒子中卸下波携带的
信息” ；于是， “廋身”恰恰是这种“信息”宇宙大
爆炸原力蛛丝马迹的反馈！
正如 基普·S.索恩说： “牛顿给了我们答案。
霍金给了我们问题。而霍金的问题本身将继续在几十
年间产生突破。当我们最终掌握量子引力定律并完全
理解宇宙的诞生时，这可能主要归功于站在霍金的肩
膀上。 ”……
二十 “把一粒沙放在一臂远的指尖上”前 130
亿年的奇点彩照确认宇宙大爆炸
2022 年“7 月 11 日，美国总统拜登在白宫公布
了被称为“韦伯第一深场”的星系团 SMACS0723 的图
像，这是韦伯太空望远镜拍摄的迄今为止最深、最清
晰的遥远宇宙红外图像，该图像也是韦伯望远镜拍摄
305的第一张全彩色图像。美国国家航空航天局（NASA）
星期二在马里兰州戈达德太空飞行中心发布韦伯太
空望远镜拍摄的大量照片和光谱数据。从首张珍贵图
像上可以看出早期宇宙的哪些信息？”路透社报道
称，韦伯太空望远镜拍摄的第一张全彩色照片是一张
星系团图像，让我们得以窥见有史以来最清晰的早期
宇宙。由美国总统拜登和 NASA 局长尼尔森联合发布
的 这 张 图 像 显 示 了 一 个 距 离 46 亿 光 年 、 名 为
SMACS0723 的星系团。它的组合质量就像一个“引力
透镜” ，扭曲了空间，从而极大地放大了来自其背后
更遥远星系的光……
306▲韦伯拍摄的首张彩色图像。
“面对浩瀚无垠的宇宙，人类总是充满了好奇：
宇宙究竟是如何起源的？有没有地外生命存在？詹
姆斯·韦布空间望远镜正是带着这种使命，开启了它
的太空旅程。 “如果你把一粒沙放在一臂远的指尖上，
307这就是你正看到的宇宙的一部分——不过是宇宙中
的一个小点。 ”美国航天局局长比尔·纳尔逊 11 日
在介绍韦布空间望远镜拍摄的首张全彩宇宙深空图
像时如此比方。 ”
【这“一粒沙”中却包含了一个星系团。美国航
天局介绍 说 ，图 像 上 是“SMACS 0723”星系团，
其中包含数千个星系。图像展现的是该星系团约 46
亿年前的样子，因为它离我们约 46 亿光年，望远镜
现在收到的光是它很久以前发出的。
图像上有一部分是来自“宇宙大爆炸”不久后的光，
也就是 130 多亿年前。美国航 天 局 表 示 ， “SMACS
0723”星系团的总质量使其可以产生“引力透镜”效
应，放大了它背后更遥远的星系。】——也就是说，
宇宙大爆炸并不是虚幻的假说；而是宇宙 130 亿年宇
宙大爆炸真实诞生的理论并得到“7.11”“彩图”坐
实且证明——“图像上有一部分是来自“宇宙大爆炸”
不久后的光，也就是 130-138 亿亿年！
第十六章 本生发现星系“球域负熵”全天
候微生命生态“通道”是对宇宙大
爆炸无处不在的微细证明
一、现代人日本水俣镇发现了一种怪病
让我们先述说现代人发现两例世界环境污染的典
308309
型案例，从其污染因子富积进入人体的渠道，会让我
们深刻地理解“本生通道”隐秘存在宇宙球域的真实
微生态效应。
1956 年 4 月日本水俣镇发现了一种怪病，患病言
语不清，走路不稳，性情狂暴。一年内有 116 人患病，
43 人死亡。病人手颤动得不能喝水，连划火柴点烟都
不能；重者卧在床上也是不断跳起，痛苦万分。当时
小镇医生查不出病因，只好叫“水俣病”。经过两年
的调查，才认定“水俣病”是重金属中毒，研究人员
从病人体内发现了甲基汞（一种剧毒化学物质）。甲
基汞是如何形成进入人体的呢？
二、现代人研究揭示甲基汞的由来=盐酸+录化物+
细菌在淤泥大爆炸诡秘的“本生通道” ：
硫
酸
+
录
化
物
+
细
菌
从图示我们可以看到甲基汞是硫酸和氯化物与小
甲 基 汞 — — — — — — — — — —
镇海底淤泥的细菌相互作用产生的。因其易溶使水
污染 。
甲基汞比氯的毒性大 200 倍，进入生物；水 →—
—→ 鱼类、贝类→陆生污染水灌溉的粮食→水果蔬
菜
→←
溶于水
水果、蔬菜、粮食
进入人310
（生物）体食用了这种生物，毒素便转移到人体，随
→ 鱼类、贝便类→
人
→ 甲基汞的聚集机体变产生病变。根据调查水俣湾上
游—— 1949 年建成一家氮肥公司的醋酸合成车间，
氯化物和硫酸是该车间催化用后随污水排放到小俣湾
的甲基汞的由来=盐酸+录化物+细菌在淤泥潜生“水俣
病”。
三、 二恶英污染大爆发无处不在姻缘
让我们再可看一现代人科学发现自然化学危害生
物现象：1999 年 3 日比利时由饲料中发现二恶英引起
鸡不生蛋，肉鸡生长异常的恶性污染。同时在牛、猪
的饲料也发现了二恶英。随后欧洲的荷兰、法国、德
国也发现二恶英污染饲料引发的畜类生长异常。经研
究认为：二恶并不是人类生产的化学产品，主要来源
城市垃圾焚烧，含氯化学品的杂质、纸浆、漂泊、汽
车尾气……二恶英是多氯甲苯，乙苯等元素的俗称，
属有毒含氯化合物。毒性比氰化甲大 1000 倍，毒性和
DDT 相当，是“毒中之王”。它可以通过皮肤、黏膜、
呼吸道、消化道进入人体（包括动物）；但 90%以上
是由膳食受害，微量摄如入二恶英立即发生病变，引
发神经系统，内分泌紊乱、畸形、致癌。二恶英耐高
温，稳定性强，一旦摄入很难排除；又不易降解。通311
→过生物链富积，其渠道如下图：
四、猫-鼠-蜂-草-牛-人生态宇宙大爆炸“负熵”
循环图
我们把上面这两个案例的图示和达尔文叙述的生
态能↓→
猫-
鼠 - 蜂 - 草 - 牛 - 人 的 循 环 图 、 美 国 生 态
人 →↓↑←——————————↓↑
→
大气↓↑→←——————↓↑
现代生物学家林德曼的生物链理论、（生物链金
字
塔
）
和
英
国
生态学家坦斯烈的生态系统理论和法国昆虫学家法不
尔提出的生物本质：昆虫-粪块-草-羊-人的同一性。
把中国古老的民谚： “大鱼吃小鱼，小鱼吃虾米，虾
米
水 果
羊
牛
鸡
鸭
粮
蛋
贝
海 鲜
吃草泥。”相互联系对比，就发现这些现代科学从不
同角度在不年代，以不同的形式都深刻地认识到：宇
宙、 生命、地球、万物在特定条件下都普遍存在着开
放隐秘的宇宙大爆炸“负熵”生态物流通道；有形的
物种个体与无形的物流通道是永远禾本科植物相通
的，任何物质自然条件下都能自由进出任何生物
物种的个体生命系统和群落系统的区域生命生态网
络；这 种 人 肉 眼 看 不 见 的 土 壤 水 无
形态的通道才给生命与无生命物实现全天候同化异
化，
提供了必须的条件，保证了各种形式生命功能自
由运动的存在，我们把这种宇宙大爆炸自然的无形生
命网络通道叫做“本生通道” ，本生通道产生的自然
生命效应叫做通道效应。
五、 本生发现宇宙大爆炸“球域负熵”全天候生
命微生态“通道”
什么是“本生通道”呢？
前面我们讲过，现代德国梅德尔的化学教授罗勃
特·本生最早用科学实验方法真实地发现了一种实验
室用灯--本生灯。本生灯点燃可发出极高热量的火焰，
本生把盐粒、煤屑、金属屑放在火焰上燃烧，立刻发
现每一种物质在燃烧中会发出自己特有的光。像金属
钠永远发出黄色火焰，钾发出紫色火焰——光谱分析
至今是哈勃和韦伯研究宇宙星系的方法。于是。本生
就发现了一种极简单，极迅速的物质光谱分析方法；
但是，因钾盐、钠盐、锂盐都发出相同的黄色火焰，
无法区分。使本生遇到了难题。此时梅得堡的物理学
教授基尔霍夫，利用三棱镜能分析光的性质，把本生
灯上各种物质的火焰分解成各不相同的光谱特性，从
312而发明了一种新仪器--分光仪。当本生灯的光线射到
分光仪的三棱镜上，可看到钾盐、锂盐、钠盐的屑在
火焰里燃烧时，每一种物质的火焰都发出不同的由几
条不同颜色带组成的光谱。比如钠的光谱只含有一 条
黄色线条。钾的紫色火焰有三条：两条红一条紫色……
这样，光谱分析便能把各种不同物质区别开来，并能
察出一千万分之一毫克钠的含量。于是本生用这种方
法，观察各种物质。
有一天，本生在一块岩石中发现了微量的锂，这
是在岩石的裂缝生长着一棵灌木，本生想这灌木从岩
石吸收营养，它的叶子必然含有锂，本生把树叶放到
灯上燃烧，果然发出了锂特有的光谱（有一条极鲜明
的红线和一条朦胧的橘黄色线条）。本生把树叶送给
一头乳牛吃，并把牛乳放在灯焰燃烧，同样发现了锂
光谱；本生又把一杯牛乳给养牛的主人喝了，从养牛
主人的一滴血里，他看到了鲜明的红色线条和旁边朦
胧的橘黄色线条……这样，就证明锂已进入养牛主人
的血液里。本生用实验发现并证明了一直打爆炸遗留
给大自然生命场普遍存在的物流通道--“本身通道”。
这是 3100 年亚里士多德生态能原理、到斯坦烈生
态系统、林德曼生物链、法布尔的生物本质最早的现
代科学家的实验证明，可惜被光谱分析的广宇应用所
313掩盖在时间的尘埃 130 多亿年里。
六 “本生通道”是大爆炸隐秘遍布于大爆炸整
体生命学和地球星系所有角落
事实上， “本生通道”是一种大爆炸隐秘并遍布
于大爆炸整体生命学地球星系所有角落，它有无限的
广宇性。“本生通道”揭示了一个秘蜜：
任何物质都有进出任何生物个体微生态的能力，
有形的物种个体生命与无形的物流通道是永远相通
的，这是宇宙大爆炸负能量微循环的宇宙大爆炸“通
道效应” ，是生态能旋线网络宇宙大爆炸本能属性的
微观见证。
现代人类从本生试验能真实、深刻地感受到宇宙
大爆炸属性：【大爆炸产生了大量的正能量，它同时
也产生同样多的负能量。通过这种方式，正的和负的
加起来总是为零。这是自然的另一个定律。……
那么，今天这些负能量普遍存在哪里呢？让我们
看一看现代人宇宙食谱中的第三种成分中：它在宇宙
空间中。这可能听起来很奇怪，但根据引力和运动的
自然定律——科学中最古老的那些定律——空间本身
就是一个巨大的负能量仓库，足以确保一切加起来为
零。】——霍金《十问沉思录》
韦伯望远镜彩图研究完全证明了霍金宇宙大爆炸
314理论。137 亿年宇宙大爆炸“负能量”在地球大生命
场存在着的“本生通道效应”是生物与个体生命之间
自由、全方位开放的整体生态“负熵”物流通道。从
本生试验“光谱分析”就像韦伯看到宇宙大爆炸那样，
让我们亲眼看到，千万分之一毫克的锂从岩石通过树
的根系-树干-树枝--树叶流动进入树的全身，又通过
树叶进入乳牛体内，遍布牛的细胞、器官、组织；再
从牛乳走进人体，通过人血：一滴血的光谱，证明了
锂的到来和存在……如果再考虑牛、人的粪便，锂会
轻松地回到土壤。再延着法布尔描写的昆虫小粪块走
入禾本科植物--草-羊-人……这是真实、直观、由实
验证明了的大生命场的广谱宇宙大爆炸“负能量”在
地球遗留的大爆炸物流通道。
“本生通道”“光谱分析”的精微，深刻远远超
过了生态系统和生物链的深层次内涵，它是生态能旋
线网络属性最直观的宇宙大爆炸遗留的“负能量”无
处不在的证明。
现代人类可以用“本生通道”的实验方法发现理
解污染：大气污染、江、河、海洋污染、水污染、土
壤污染、直到生物污染……就变得更直观、更深刻、
更易于理解，更具有整体性！同样，用本生通道实验
去观查水俣病、二恶英污染案例，再去阅读美国生物
315学家切尔·卡尔逊的《寂静的春天》就会更关心地球
的命运，更深刻地理解卡尔逊的良苦用心啦！……
七、宇宙大爆炸生命通道与性基因“半株漂移”
的量子属性
2022 年 7 月 11 日韦伯望远镜彩图证明【大爆
炸后 10 秒后：约 30 亿度，核时期，氢、氦类稳定原子核（化
学元素）形成。当宇宙冷却到 109 开尔文以下（约 100 秒后），
粒子转变不可能发生了。核合成计算指出，重子密度仅占拓
扑平宇宙所需物质的 2%~5%，强烈暗示了其他物质能量的形
式（非重子暗物质和暗能量）充满了宇宙 。】既然“物质
能量的形式（非重子暗物质和暗能量）充满了宇宙” ，自
然而然，地球生命“负能量”和微生物在生态能旋线
网络中就无处不在，并表现出性基因“半株漂移”的
量子属性 。
只要把整体生命生态作用与两性基因无处不在考
虑进去，就得到薛定谔“提出“生命以负熵为生” ，
从环境中抽取“序”来维持系统的组织的概念和普遍
性繁殖的“班株漂移”量子属性，这是生命的热力学
基础”和生命繁殖不可或缺的本能。从“本生通道”
的光谱分析的触角就和宇宙大爆炸“能量充满宇宙”
变得惊人的神奇——又因为生命繁殖特别是微生物细
菌是“半株繁殖”的生理构造。生命个体、细菌、病
316毒多是裂变（裂殖）、无性二分裂繁殖，即细菌生长
到一定时期，在细胞中间逐渐形成横隔，由一个母细
胞分裂为两个大小相等的“半株”子细胞，可以自由
漂移，在大气、在土壤、在任何生物体无处不在并存
在量子基础纠缠属性……
《大英百科全书》记载“一克花园的泥土含有几
十亿的细菌。一滴口水含有几百万”的神奇，同样，
生物学家荷冈·马格理斯说： “人体皮肤每一平方公
分就有 10 万左右的微生物（微生物还包括非细菌的单
细胞生物；但绝大多数都是细菌。）”如果人体 10%
是细菌的存有量是精确的话，人和细菌共生、共溶存
在量子属性就是不争的“半株漂移”纠缠事实。
显然，细菌在有机体形成的本生通道的细密微小
用现代的显微镜是无法观察到的。如果把“裂缝动物
相”和南极古老的冻岩中都有的“石内生物”考虑进
去，宇宙大爆炸遗留能量在地球彰显生态能旋线网络
的下限就要深入到海底，其上限就要上浮到整个宇宙。
因为环球大气中的氧的生成和“太地循环”与构
成是和植物繁殖、特别与细菌半株漂移分不开的！……
总之，地球诡异广宇“本生通道”光谱分析证明生命
是一个宇宙能量自洽的生物能微循环广谱相对独立的
宇宙系统，任何生命从不排斥任何物质运用本生通道
317来去自由地进出有机体（细胞、器官、组织）特别是
性基因“半株漂移”的量子属性。
我们把这种宇宙大爆炸能量遗留自然现象称作
本生通道效应。简称“通道效应” ，它说明人（微生
物）和大自然时时刻刻是共生、共容、共洽、相通的
的宇宙大爆炸韦伯式“天人感应”性基因“半株漂移”
的量子属性……亦是对宇宙大爆炸整体生命学最有利
的韦伯式“光谱分析”宇宙负能量整体生命学全方位
存在性基因纠缠最有力地证明。
第十七章、现代科学大师薛定谔对宇宙大爆炸整体生
命学量子属性最伟大的贡献
一、薛定谔整合物理学和生命科学开创与回归宇宙大
爆炸整体生命学经典量子属性“生命以负熵为生”
薛定谔在《生命是什么》开章“序言”就明示
说： “我们从先辈那里继承了对于统一的，无所不知
的和知识的强烈渴望。最高学府的大学（“大学”一
词在英文中和普遍性同学跟）这个名称使我们想起了
从古到今多少世纪以来，只有普遍性才是唯一可以打
满分的。可是近 100 多年来，知识的各种分支在广度
和深度上的扩展使我们陷入了一种奇异的两难境地。
我们清楚地感到，一方面我们现在还只是刚刚在开始
获得某些可靠的资料，试图把所有已知的知识综合成
318为一个统一的整体；可是，另一方面，一个人想要驾
御比一个狭小的专门领域再多一点的知识，也已经是
几乎不可能的了。除非我们中间有些人敢于着手总结
那些事实和理论，即使其中有的是属于第二手的和不
完备的知识，而且还敢于冒把自己看成蠢人的风险，
除此之外，我看不到再有摆脱这种两难境地的危险的
其他办法了。否则，我们的真正目的永远不可能达到。”
——这一开宗明示，薛定谔就把物理学整合到生命科
学，演绎了用量子力学去研究生命大分子。
薛定谔惊呼： “即基因结构似乎只包含比较少
的数量的原子（1000UM 数量级，可以还要少）。然而，
它却表现出最有规律，最守法的活动——并有如此持
久性永久性，这就是一种奇迹”。
薛定谔运用量子力学研究发现，亘古生命演化历
史证明：任何生命除在短短的胚胎期（种子萌芽并无
例外）发育“负熵”来自母体之外，全部生长期到死
亡完全是以获得（食物）为生（生命以负熵为生——
薛定谔），并确认了生命“二阶段法则”的；其中绝
大部分是获得食物本能天经地义地形成食性，而且任
何有机体都受食（物）性制约，都选择与种性相适应
的食物。也就是说，种性与食（物）性是相对应的相
得益彰、有益并延长生命之本能，传宗接代、千古延
319续之源，RNA 复制永不改变。
二、《生命是什么？》确凿生命量子力学的微观物种
不变论
RNA 复制永不改变，必然导致林奈的“物种不变
论”来源宇宙大爆炸整体生命学；薛定谔这样说：【今
天我们确切地知道，达尔文把即使在最纯的种群里也
必定会出现的微小的、连续的偶然变异当成了自然选
择的材料，这是错误的。因为事实已经证明，这些变
异并不是遗传的。这个事实很重要，值得作简要说明。
如果拿一捆纯种大麦，一个麦穗一个麦穗地测量其麦
芒的长度，并根据统计结果作图，那么你会得到一条
钟形曲线，如图 7 所示。该图显示了长有明确长度的
麦芒的麦穗数与麦芒长度的关系。换句话说，一定的
中等长度占优势，沿两个方向都会出现一定频率的偏
差。现在挑出一组麦穗（图中涂黑色的那组），其麦
芒长度明显超过平均长度，但麦穗的数目足以在田里
播种并长出新的作物。倘若对新长出的大麦作同样的
统计，达尔文可能会预期相应的曲线向右移动。换句
话说，他会期待通过选择来增加麦芒的平均长度。但
如果使用的是真正纯种繁育的大麦品系，就不会是这
种情况。从选出来播种的长麦芒麦穗的后代那里得到
的新统计曲线，将与第一条曲线完全相同，如果选择
320麦芒特别短的麦穗作种子，情况也是一样。选择不会
产生影响——因为微小的、连续的变异不被遗传。这
些变异显然不是以遗传物质的结构为基础，而是偶然
的。然而在大约 40 年前，荷兰人德弗里斯（de Vries）
发现，即使在完全纯种繁育的原种的后代里，34 也有
极少数个体（比如几万分之二三）出现了微小但却“跳
跃式”的变化。“跳跃式”并不是指这个变化相当大，
而是说它不连续，未变与少许改变之间没有中间形式。
德弗里斯称之为突变。重要的事实是不连续性。这使
物理学家想起了量子论——两个相邻能级之间没有中
间能量。他会倾向于把德弗里斯的突变论比作生物学
的量子论。以后我们会看到，这远不只是比喻。突变
实际上是由基因分子中的量子跃迁所引起的。然而当
德弗里斯 1902 年首次发表他的发现时，量子论才刚刚
问世两年。难怪要由另一代去发现它们之间的密切关
联！——《生命是什么》-33、3】
薛定谔强调“突变必须是罕有事件”说：【迄今
为止，我们倾向于把注意力集中在有害的突变上，这
种突变可能更多一些；但必须明确指出，我们的确也
碰到过有利的突变。如果说自发突变是物种发展道路
上的一小步，那么我们就得到了一种印象，即有些变
化是冒着可能是有害的因而会被自动消除的风险而偶
321然做出的“试验”。由此引出了非常重要的一点。要
想成为自然选择的合适材料，突变必须是罕有事件，
就像它实际的那样。假如突变非常频繁，以致有很大
的机会，比如同一个体内出现了十几个不同的突变，
那么有害的突变一般会比有利的突变占优势，物种非
但不会通过选择而得到改良，反而会停滞在没有改良
的状态，或者消亡。——《生命是什么》-28】
薛定谔确认物种不变来自基因的“保守性”-【基
因的高度持久性导致的相当程度的保守性是至关重要
的……因为在前几节中我们已经断言，频繁的突变对
演化是有害的。对于那些通过突变而获得一种不很稳
定的基因构形的个体，它们“极端激进的”
（ultra-radical）迅速突变的后代很难有机会长期生
存下去。该物种将会抛弃这些个体，并通过自然选择
将稳定的基因收集起来。——《生命是什么》-64】
那么，【生命的典型特征是什么？一块物质什么
时候可以说是活的呢？回答是当它继续“做某种事
情” ，运动，与环境交换物质等等的时候，而且可以
指望它比无生命物质在类似情况下“持续下去”的时
间要长得多。当一个不是活的系统被孤立出来或者被
置于均匀的环境中时，由于各种摩擦力的影响，所有
运动通常都很快静止下来；电势或化学势的差别消失
322了，倾向于形成化合物的物质也是如此，温度因热传
导而变得均一。此后，整个系统逐渐衰退成一块死寂
的、惰性的物质，达到一种持久不变的状态，可观察
的事件不再出现。物理学家把这种状态称为热力学平
衡或“最大熵”。
实际上，这种状态通常很快就会达到。从理论上
讲，它往往还不是一种绝对平衡，还不是真正的最大
熵。但最后趋近平衡的过程非常缓慢，可能是几小时、
几年、几个世纪……。——《生命是什么》-56】……
【有机体能够避免很快衰退为惰性的“平衡”态，这
似乎成了难解之谜，以至于从很早的时候开始，人类
就曾声称有某种特殊的非物理的或超自然的力（“活
力” ， “隐得来希”）在有机体中起作用，现在仍然
有人这样主张。
生命有机体是如何避免衰退的呢？一个显而易见
的回答是：通过吃、喝、呼吸以及（植物的）同化。
专业术语叫“新陈代谢”（metabolism）。这个词来
自希腊词μεταβάλλειν，意为“变化”或
“交换”。交换什么呢？最初的基本观点无疑是物质
交换（例如，新陈代谢所对应的德文词 Stoffwechsel
的字面含义就是物质交换）。认为物质交换应该是本
质性的，这种看法是荒谬的。任何一个氮原子、氧原
323子、硫原子等等和其他任何一个氮原子、氧原子、硫
原子都是一样的，交换它们能得到什么呢？曾有人对
我们说，我们是以能量为生的，这暂时平息了我们的
好奇心。在一些发达国家（我记不清是德国还是美国，
或者两个国家都是）的饭馆里，你会发现菜单上除价
目外还标明了每道菜的能量含量。不用说，这实在很
荒唐。对于一个成年有机体来说，能量含量和物质含
量一样都是固定不变的。既然任何一个卡路里与其他
任何一个卡路里的价值是一样的，我们确实看不出单
纯的交换有什么用处。71
那么，我们的食物中到底含有什么宝贵的东西使
我们能够免于死亡呢？这个问题很容易回答。每一个
过程、事件、偶然发生的事——无论叫它什么，简言
之，自然界中正在发生的一切，都意味着它在其中发
生的那部分世界的熵的增加。因此，生命有机体在不
断增加自己的熵——或者可以说是在产生正熵——从
而趋向于危险的最大熵状态，那就是死亡。要想摆脱
死亡或者活着，只有从环境中不断吸取负熵——我们
很快就会明白，负熵是非常正面的东西。有机体正是
以负熵为生的。或者不那么悖谬地说，新陈代谢的本
质是使有机体成功消除了它活着时不得不产生的所有
熵——《生命是什么》-57】
324三、遗传机制是与量子论密切相关的甚至建立在
量子论的基础之上遗传机制早就进入宇宙大爆炸整体
生命学架构之中
薛定谔在《生命是什么》揭示：【遗传机制是与
量子论密切相关的，甚至建立在量子论的基础之上。
量子论是马克斯·普朗克（Max Planck）1900 年发现
的。而现代遗传学可以追溯到德弗里斯、科伦斯和切
尔马克（1900 年）重新发现孟德尔的论文，以及德弗
里斯讨论突变的论文（1901—1903 年）。因此，这两
大理论几乎是同时诞生的，难怪它们需要成熟到一定
程度之后才会产生关联。逾 1/4 个世纪之后，直到 1926
—1927 年，海特勒（W.Heitler）和伦敦（F.London）
才概述了化学键量子论的一般原理。海特勒-伦敦理论
包含了量子论最新进展（被称为“量子力学”或“波
动力学”）的最为复杂精细的观念。】并提出“生命
以负熵为生”（负熵来自宇宙大爆炸）；这种种性与
食（物）性一一相对应是宇宙大爆炸以来亘古由来的。
那么，遗传特性的持久程度有多大，携带它们的
物质结构必须因此而具有什么性质呢？
薛定谔回答： “其实，无须专门研究便可回答这
个问题。我们谈到了遗传特性，单凭这个事实就已经
表明，我们承认持久性几乎是绝对的。”——生命体
325长时间的内外环境选择形成的种性与食性的高度统一
系统，能量来自“生命以负熵为生”机制，自然而然
就形成“种性制约机制” ，原因就在于薛定谔整合物
理学和生命科学开创了量子力学亘古不变的整体生命
学法则： “生命以负熵为生”。
这种“机制”早在 1856 年孟德尔开始了豌豆杂
交实验，并孟德尔十年豌豆试验得到确认和证明，自
然升华到“3 ：1 生命数理”大自然秘籍数论的核
心！……
面对“黄豌豆和绿豌豆杂交的结果是，后代结出
的是清一色的黄豌豆”的独特性状，孟德尔有过独辟
蹊径的回答：
“你看， ”孟德尔解释说， “性状只能有一个—
—种子不可能又黄又绿，而来自父母的遗传性状却有
两个。那么我们看到的结果就说明，来自父母的遗传
性状如果互相矛盾，则只有一个会胜出——就像黄色
的种子、紫色的花朵，以及高高的茎秆，而另一个就
会被‘隐藏’起来。很简单，不是吗？”
可惜啊！多年孟德尔的天才预言被权威打入冷
宫，在时间的封尘等待了 35 年，一直到 1900 年才重
新发现！……
对于这种现象，薛定谔运用量子力学解释说： “即
326基因结构似乎饱合比较如数量的原子（1000？）数量
级，可以还要少，然而它却喜欢出最有规律，阿尔法
的活动——并有如此持久性和永久性这就是一种奇
迹。”
薛定谔继续强调说：【要使遗传物质的高度持久
性与它的微小尺寸协调一致，就必须通过“发明分子”
来避免无序的倾向。事实上，这种分子大得异乎寻常，
必定是高度分化的秩序的杰作，受到了量子论魔法的
保护。机会的法则并没有因这种“发明”而失效，只
是结果被修改了。物理学家都知道，经典物理学定律
已经被量子论修改了，尤其是低温情况下。这样的例
子有很多。生命似乎就是其中一例，而且特别引人注
目。生命似乎是物质的有序和有规律的行为，它不是
完全基于从有序走向无序的倾向，而是部分基于得到
保持的现存秩序。】
也就是说，现代人文明五千年文字记载的生物持
久性事实并不支持一种生物能转变成另一种生物的
“进化”伪命题，它违背了宇宙大爆炸整体生命学“遗
传机制”！
四、遗传是机制！遗传是淘汰不适生存物种个体的选
择过程，它是通过动植物生殖（分型）实现的种内强
者个体繁衍生命延续之生命整体性
327请看《生命是什么？》“第二章 遗传机制
“存在是永恒的，因为有许多法则保护了生命的
宝藏，而宇宙从这些宝藏中汲取了美。”
——歌德
【于是我们得到的结论是,一个有机体和它经历
的全部生物学相关过程,必须具有极多的“多原子"结
构,必须防止偶然的“单原子"事件起到太重大的作用。
“朴素物理学家"告诉我们的这一点是重要的，正因如
此，有机体可以具有足够精确的物理学定律，并按照
这些定律实现其颇有规则和颇有秩序的功能。从生物
学观点来说，这些先验地得出的(就是说,从纯粹的物
理学观点得出的)结论，能否和实际的生物学事实相符
呢?
乍看起来,人们往往认为这个结论是无关紧要的。
比如说，30 年前的生物学家也许已经讲过这一点。可
是，对于强调统计物理学对有机体像其他地方一样具
有同样重要性的通俗讲演者来说，这个结论还是十分
恰当的,尽管实际上这也不过是人所共知的道理而已。
因为对任何高等生物的成年个体来说,不仅它的躯体，
而且是组成躯体的每一个单细胞都包含着“天文数字”
的各种原子。而且如同 30 年前已知道的那样,我们观
328察的每一个特定的生理过程,不论在细胞内或在细胞
同周围环境的相互作用中,也总是包含了那么多的单
原子和单原子过程。这就保证了物理学和化学的相关
定律的有效性，即使按照统计物理学关于“大数”的
严格要求,也能保证定律的有效性;这种严格要求就是
我刚才所说的√n 律。
如今，我们知道这个设想是错误的。正如下面即
将看到的，在活有机体内有许多极其小的原子团,小到
不足以显示精确的统计学定律，而它们在极有秩序和
极有规律的事件中确实起着支配作用。它们控制着有
机体在发育过程中获得的、可观察的大尺度性状，决
定了有机体发挥功能的重要特征;在所有这些情况下,
都显示了十分确定而严格的生物学定律。】——遗传
是机制！遗传是淘汰生存不适者的选择过程，它是通
过动植物生殖（分型）实现的种内繁衍生命现象，这
就是“种性”。生物个体离开了生殖（子代）就根本
谈不上生存与生存斗争，更没有什么自然选择演化的
渐进趋势和遗传机制；由于宇宙生命不存在种间生殖，
种和超越种性繁殖的法则，跨种间个体不能交配，交
而不育（即使交配也不育）！
跨种生物个体不能生育繁殖，这就从根源上阻断
不同种类个体生物的混同遗传，这就自然形成种持久
329保存同种个体生命亘古存在种性纯洁的机制——我们
把这叫“种性制约机制”。
我们把同种生命个体保持自己种性的自然选择过
程叫做“种性制约”机制，这是自然系统的生命本性
规律，制约机制是通过薛定谔的“遗传机制”来完成
的，没有同种个体的子代繁衍，就没有遗传，更谈不
上“遗传机制” ；达尔文的《物种起源》就只能是痴
人说梦的惊天骗局！
薛定谔用量子理论进一步研究说： “要点是，两
个【子细胞”中的每一个都得到了与亲细胞完全相似
的另外两套完整的染色体。因此，所有体细胞都有完
全一样的染色体。注 1123——这就是性基因的量子纠
缠。
无论我们对这种机制了解多么少，我们也不能不
认为，它一定通过某种“量子纠缠”方式与有机体的
机能密切相关，因为每一个单细胞，甚至是不太重要
的单细胞，都拥有密码本的全套（两份）副本。】—
—这就是“种性制约机制”宇宙大爆炸“量子纠缠”
亘古存在至今量子力学证明！
“种性制约机制”不仅是植物、动物个体繁衍“遗
传机制”的生命法则，在微生物（细菌、真菌、病毒）
也存着相同的规律性。诺贝尔医学奖获得者 M 德尔布
330力克《关于“生命之诞”的争议》中通过实验证明其
结论： “这些新近的成果却一致表明，引制剂保生存
不绝是物理化学方法处理病毒，又不致破坏其传染特
异性，此时，属于同一种病毒的个体，其得为异常一
致。这样的一群个体在电源仪器内的匀速度移动，它
从溶液中均匀地结晶出来，其特有的传染性不会因再
结晶而改变，即使是最大程度的分部再结晶的情况下
也是如此。” 、现代人“过去有一种错误的观点，认
为细菌病毒是一种化学分子而不是生物。我们的工作
表明，某些大的蛋白质（后来的研究表明噬菌体的成
分其实是核酸与蛋白质各占一半）分子（病毒）具有
在生物体内增殖的特性。这是一个对化学来说如此不
同而对生物来说又是如此基本的特征。”
从现代人科学历史里看，微生物是 1675 年虎克借
助放大镜发现发现水滴中的“微生物” ，至今不借助
放大（显微技术）人们肉眼仍不可看到微观生物。哪
个时代电子显微技术还没有诞生、量动学和分子生物
学的交叉学科都没有产生，所以林耐没有完成对微生
物的分类：瑞典博物学家和植物分类学家卡洛斯·林
奈在 1735 年发表的大作《自然系统》中，将古希腊哲
学家亚里士多德提出的基于感性认识的“两界”（植
物界、动物界），进行了科学划分：生物界分成植物
331界和动物界，历史局限留下一个微观生物学分类的尾
巴-微生物分类；现代人至今微生物仅仅是从大的框架
上区分为：细菌、真菌、病毒……
具体到每一个种类的微生物反以形态分为杆菌、
圆形、扁平、球形、螺旋形区分；或以其传染疾病叫
天花菌、鼠疫病菌、结核菌、感冒菌等……但无论怎
样分类微生物的“种性制约机制”是自然系统无法改
变的生命个体本性，这就是“科赫准则”本源！微生
物致病表现出唯一性的特征；天花菌只感染天花、新
冠病毒只感染新冠、结核菌只传染结核病……微生物
“遗传机制”的致病因子只能传播一种专属疾病（遗
传因子），自然形成种性的微生物传染特异传播之种
性，这就是微生物“种性制约机制”的专属表达。
【从德尔布吕克对遗传物质的一般描述可以看
出，生命物质虽然遵循业已确立的“物理定律” ，但
可能还涉及尚不为人所知的“其他物理定律” ，这些
定律一旦被揭示出来，将和以前的定律一样，成为这
门科学必不可少的组成部分。】——薛定谔《生命是
什么》
“种性制约机制”就在整合薛定谔“遗传机制”
的“量子纠缠”中，由强燕平提出而自然而然诞生了！
第十八章 现代人的六界生物“遗传机制”
332本能出自宇宙大爆炸整体生命学之“种性”
的亘古不变
一、现代人科学家林奈分类学留下微生物分类空白
在 1735 年林奈《自然系统》问世，完成了古希
腊哲学家亚里士多德提出宏观感性认识的“两界”（植
物界、动物界）分类，完成生物界分为植物界和动物
界。并提出“物种不变”！林奈说：
“1、由于不存在新种；2、由于一种生命总是产
生与其同类的生物；3、由于每种生物的每个个体总是
其后代的开始，因此必须把这些祖先的不变性归于某
个全知的……这是被每个有生命个体的机制、原理、
定律、体质和感觉所证明的”——这种“两界不变”
的机制，就是自然存在的“种性制约机制”本能！
1675 年虎克用放大镜发现微生物以后多年，电子
显微镜还没有出现，林奈的两界分类依然主导生命分
类学。然而，随着电子显微镜问世，发现的微生物种
类越来越多，就产生了林奈生命“两界”的历史局限
性，林奈对微生物分类留下空白：比如，对草履虫、
变形虫和疟原虫等归入动物界和把藻类（例如裸藻和
甲藻）等归入植物界的林奈两界争论不休；因为在结
构上，这些微小生命远比多细胞的动物和植物更为简
单，仅仅是“单细胞生物”1866 年在林奈两界的基础
333上，又加上“原生生物界” ，生命分类成为：三界分
类系统；填补了林奈分类学留下微生物分类空白。
二、现代人科学家在绿石带上发现了一些距今
37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿年的细菌化石
【2017 年 3 月“据西班牙《国家报》3 月 1 日报
道，一个由伦敦、美国和挪威等国的地质学家、古生
物学家和纳米科学家组成的国际团队日前在加拿大魁
北克省北部哈德森湾的 Nuvvuagittuq 绿石带上发现
了一些距今 37.7 亿年至 42.8 亿年的细菌化石，地球
诞生至今 45 亿年，因此此次发现的细菌化石被认为是
迄今已知最古老的生命证据。”……“Nuvvuagittuq
绿石带上包含了一些地质学领域已知的最古老的沉积
岩。从源头上说，这些沉积岩是一个富含放射性铁的
深海热液喷口的一部分。很多科学家认为，这些能源
和矿产丰富的地方就是 40 亿年前地球上孕育最初生
命形式——最早的细菌——的摇篮。”——《科学家
发现已知最古老生命证据：42 亿年前细菌化石
2017-03-03 00:21:02 来源：参考消息网 责任编辑：
周擎浩 》——按霍金“大爆炸”理论，宇宙、地球需
要 6-8 亿年的冷却期，这样在距今 37.7 亿年至 42.8
亿间，在地球诞生 10 亿年后出现细菌，地球才有可能
在冷却后漫长的地质演化过程中，沉积成为化石。
334现代伦敦学院大学科学家马修·多德认为，这项
发现对生命是在地球诞生后不久萌芽于深海热喷口的
理论提供了支持。地球上生命的诞生如此迅速也与此
前发现的一些距今 37 亿年的微生物相吻合。也就是
说，37 亿年前诞生了微生物；然而，人类发现微生物
却是安东尼·列文虎克（Antony van Leeuwenhoek，
1632 年 10 月 24 日—1723 年 8 月 26 日），于 1674
年在牙齿污垢发现“非常微小的动物” ，这就是细菌
和原生动物（微生物），细菌以什么形态、如何进入
牙垢？虎克没有说明。成为一个千古之谜，迷途。】
——引自强燕平《半株漂移说》
三、 “种性制约机制”致使科学家巴斯德发现细
菌蚕病“胡椒粉”首创细菌是感染源
细菌虽然存在了 46 亿年（现代人类的认为），因
为人肉眼看不见，一直到 1683 年，列文.虎克自制的
单透镜显微镜放大 200 倍观察偶然发现了细菌；
1878 年，法国外科医生塞迪悦(Charles
Emmanuel Sedillot, 1804-1883)提出“微生物”概念
描述细菌，因为细菌是单细胞微生物，用人肉眼根本
看见，细菌的繁殖与致病性免疫性，一直到 1865 年才
为法国巴斯德第一个发现：
1865 年 7 月，巴斯德抵达阿拉斯（Alais；养蚕
335重镇），亲身参与蚕病的研究，病蚕的身上长满棕黑
的斑点，就像粘了一身胡椒粉。法国人称这种病为“胡
椒病”。巴斯德很快从蚕蛹和蚕蛾身上的形态“胡椒
粉”发现繁殖快、能传染蚕的病原体，巴斯德用显微
镜观察，发现一种很小的、椭圆形的棕色微粒，是它
感染到桑蚕和桑叶，蚕的疫病来源找到了并找到了杀
灭病原体的方法，终于制服了蚕病。
那么， “胡椒粉”病原体如何进入桑蚕和桑叶
感染蚕致病的呢?仍然是个谜！……
1880 年路易斯·巴斯德成功地研制出鸡霍乱疫
苗、狂犬病疫苗等多种疫苗，开创疫苗学理论和免疫
法，完成 19 世纪医学实践的重大变革，被世界公认为
“细菌学之祖”。
四、现代人科学家的“科赫准则”首次证明了一种特
定的微生物是特定疾病的病原
和巴斯德同时指出“细菌可导致疾病”的生物学
家，还有罗伯特·科赫(Robert Koch, 1843-1910)。
科赫一生最伟大的发现是“科赫准则” ，有史以来第
一个证明一种特定的微生物是特定疾病的病原，阐明
了特定细菌会引起特定的疾病；发明了用固体培养基
的细菌纯培养法。
林奈提出两界“物种不变” ；科赫提出细菌（微
336生物）“种性不变”。也就是说，微生物（细菌、病
毒、真菌）都存在自己固定不变的“种性” ；表现在
“科赫法则”上！绝对是一种病毒（细菌、病毒、真
菌）只感染传播一种疾病！
“科赫法则”是伟大的德国细菌学家罗伯特·科
赫（Robert Koch，1843～1910 年）提出的一套科学
验证方法，用以验证了细菌与病害的唯一性关系，被
后人奉为传染病病原鉴定的金科玉律。它为病原微生
物学系统研究的方法建立和奠定了基础， “首次证明
了一种特定的微生物是特定疾病的病原”使其成为一
门独立的学科，成为在世界医学领域中令德国人骄傲
无比的泰斗科学巨匠。
科赫法则具体内容：
1、在每一病例中都出现相 du 同的微生物，且在
zhi 健康者体内不存在；
2、要从宿主分 dao 离出这样的微生物并在培养基
中得到纯培养（pure culture）；
3、用这种微生物的纯培养物接种健康而敏感的宿
主，同样的疾病会重复发生；
4、从试验发病的宿主中能再度分离培养出这种微
生物来。
科赫法则是建立在物种不变和马尔萨斯“二原理”
337生命科学理论本源之上，是“种性制约”由来之本源！
五、现代人科学家日本生物学家勤渡边找到了微
生物“自由漂浮 DNA 环”
1963 年日本生物学家勤渡边找到了“半株漂移”
密码 DNA 载体，发现了细菌的一种神秘现象，发现了
细菌还含有自由漂浮的 DNA 环。即今天我们说的质体。
勤渡边认为： “自由漂浮 DNA 环”有可能是独
立的有机体，这样质体才是世界上最小的生态微观生
命元，并认为它有可能是独立的有机体，这样质体才
是世界上最小的生态微观生命元，它有细菌的细胞壁
内生活和繁殖能力，当一对细菌碰到一起时，质体能
从一个传到另一个里面去，甚至从一种细菌传到另一
种细菌。进一步的研究证明： “自由漂浮 DNA 环”自
己也能与细胞染色体结合，质体的片段能从一个质体
移向另一个质体，或者它们自己会连接到所在细菌，
或另一个细菌的染色体上。这就是薛定谔的量子力学
的“量子跃迁”的“半株漂移”在最小生命元的体现，
呈现细胞内有环状 DNA 自由漂浮，细菌的这种随机的
神秘变幻与转圜裂殖，存在地球宇宙微生物无处不在
的“半株漂移”特质漂移特征——这才形成宇宙、地
球星系、大气微生物无处不在、来无踪去无影！……
六、现代美国生物学家考柏兰另立了一个“真菌界”
338长期以来，人类对真菌往往和细菌混同在一起，
这样就忽略了真菌的起源。后来人们发现真菌的有些
特点和植物相似，某些方面又和动物有相似之处。进
一步根据营养方式的比较研究，食用的蘑菇和面包酵
母等……归入植物界不妥；细胞壁的化学组成是几丁
质而不是纤维素，储存的是糖原而不是淀粉，虽然是
异养型，然而主要为腐生或寄生，和动物或其他植物
区别极大。科学家确认它们不是植物也不是动物，而
是一个独立的生物类群；1938 年美国生物学家考柏兰
另立了一个真菌界，自此生命分类成为： “四界”类
系统。
真菌界的独立和真菌的发现与“四界” ，接下来
分类将使“食物链”完善进入生命“六界”分类。完
成进一步的微生物细分。
七、现代科学家魏泰克把“原核生物界”归入“五界”
从生物学的角度来说，自然界中的微生物可以分
为真核微生物（例如菌物界的真菌、黏菌，植物界中
的显微藻类和动物界中的原生、后生动物）、原核微
生物（例如众所周知的各类细菌）；随着无细胞核单
细胞生物—细菌、蓝藻、放线菌、支原体、衣原体、
立克次氏体等（迄今至少发现 4000 多种）原核生物被
发现……
3391969 年生物学家魏泰克在“四界”之外，再加
进了“原核生物界” ，提出广泛应用的五界分类系统。
虽然原核生物曾是地球上唯一的生命形式，历史
曾独占地球长达 20 多亿年，但它的细胞内没有任何带
膜的细胞器，却同样以分裂方式繁殖后代，仿佛没有
性行为，分裂方式繁殖后代和细菌性行为没有两样，
这种分类已经广为接受。
八、现代病毒的发现
人类发现病毒比较晚在 19 世纪 40 年代——事实
上，是德国农业化学家麦尔（Adolf Eduard Mayer，
1843-1942）最早发现病毒，麦尔自 1879 年开始对烟
草的种植展开了长时间的观察与实验研究，并于 1882
年将这种烟草疾病命名为“烟草花叶病”这就是最早
发现的病毒（Tobacco Mosaic Virus，缩写 TMV）；
麦尔是发现烟草花叶病致病因子第一人，其研究结果
对正在撰写与烟草花叶病有关的学位论文的俄国学生
伊万诺夫斯基和在瓦格宁根工作的荷兰同行贝杰林克
影响巨大，奠定了独一无二的基础。鉴此，斯坦利在
1944 年发表的一篇文章中指出：有相当多的理由将俄
国的植物生理学家伊万诺夫斯基（（Dmitri Ivanovsky,
1864-1920）视作新兴的病毒学学科之父;因率先成功
制备烟草花叶病毒蛋白质结晶而分享 1946 年诺贝尔
340化学奖。植物病毒发现后，病毒概念进入动物界，成
为现代感染人类最重要病原体。——这样 2000 多年前
的黑死病一直到 1918 年西班牙女士大流感都进入病
毒学领域加以研究！……
《现代病毒学导论》讲解；病毒是亚微观的寄生
性的含有蛋白质衣壳的遗传物质颗粒;病毒与细菌不
同，是一类极小的非细胞生物；其体积小到可以通过
细菌过滤器，人们只能借助电子显微镜才能看到它；
病毒的结构非常简单，通常由蛋白质衣壳和核酸内芯
组成。
正如威廉 · 麦克尼尔所说： “我们永远难以逃
脱生态系统的局限。不管我们高兴与否，我们都处在
食物链之中，吃，也被吃。”——2019 年 12 月爆发
的全球新冠病毒大流行，截止海外网 1 月 16 日电 根
据 Worldometer 实时统计数据，截至北京时间 2022
年 1 月 16 日 6 时 30 分，全球累计确诊新冠肺炎病例
326207456 例，累计死亡病例 5552503 例。全球单日
新增确诊病例 2802276 例，新增死亡病例 7578 例。也
就是说，全球已经有 5552503 人“被吃”……
九、现代人发现病毒的外蛋白质壳内遗传物简单属性
不属于“五界”遂有“生物六界分类系统”
在微生物界，也同样存在类似动植物界的食物链
341关系，而病毒并不属于“五界” ，鉴于病毒并不属于
“五界” ，奥地利生物学家特劳巴、中国昆虫学家陈
世骧分别于 1975 年、1977 年提出了“生物六界分类
系统” ：把病毒定为是“五界”之外的“第六界”。
英国《每日邮报》2020 年 3 月 13 日报道，在日
本深海的淤泥中发现的一种神秘微生物“食盐菌” ，
是古代细菌等简单“单细胞生物”与孕育人类的“多
细胞生物”之间的缺失环节—细菌体与多细胞构成的
动植物之间的过渡阶段。
有不完整的球形细胞的食盐菌，直径大约 500 纳
米，长着细长的分枝状触手，具有“古生菌”的部分
特征。古生菌是一种相对简单的单细胞生物，缺乏完
整的细胞核等内部结构，是原核生物细胞群的一部分。
长期以来，科学家对简单类细菌细胞向复杂的真
核细胞演化过渡感到迷惑不解。为了揭晓其中的谜团，
日本研究小组花了 10 年时间收集了含有古生菌的泥
浆，在实验室里培育出了食盐菌，并研究了它与一种
伴生细菌的关系，确定它是否能在下一阶段演化成有
更复杂细胞核的细胞……“人类是由真核细胞构成，
其起源演化是一个至关重要的问题。”参加研究的日
本筑波产业技术综合研究所的微生物学家政信伸说，
“食盐菌的子群生活在寒冷的海底，靠近位于格陵兰
342岛和挪威之间叫作‘洛基城堡的热液喷口系统，是最
早的真菌生物的现存近亲物种。”
从病毒的外蛋白质壳内遗传物简单属性看病毒是
不是生命呢？这两个问题还没有最终的答案—科学研
究将不断更新传统学说或观念……
十、3000 年病毒对现代人类的危害史无前例①
我们生命百科全书中 5×10 的九次方毕特的信息
量就包含在每一个细胞核中。这样每一个细胞就是一
个完整的关于怎样构成身体每一个部分的指令库，当
受精卵分裂时，最早两组（量子纠缠）遗传因子指令
按形成人胚胎的发育过程，认真地进行复制。如果用
数量来表示的话，一个病毒大约需要 10 的 13 次方毕
特的信息才能构成。这从西班牙女士流感病毒的破译
可见一斑：
现代人发现并记载，从公元前 431 年的黑死病到
1918 年西班牙女士大流感病毒引爆人类灾难已经
3000 多年，仅大流感就死亡 5000 万——一亿人！……
病毒对人类的危害是史无前例的；一直到 2019 突发全
球新冠病毒大流行，至今仍然在全球肆虐！
1996 年，现代美军病理学研究所成员陶本伯格利
用分子生物学技术，从美军病理库的 1918 年死者的肺
切片中分离出 1918 年大流感病毒的片段。这仅仅是片
343段，据说曾去冻土带考察挖掘；1997 年，陶本伯格收
到乔汉 · 赫尔汀的样本后研究进展顺利，于 2005
年 10 月人工复制成功 1918 年大流感病毒株，确立了
两个“半株”病毒的“转化”重组模式，确定西班牙
女士大流感病毒是猪型和人基因演化组合的 H1N1 病
毒，开创了世界人畜半株病毒“H1”“N1”瘟疫半株
命名法。
陶本伯格 2005 年复制并开创一种整个系列病毒
基因“半株”（H 与 N）数列组合命名体系：这是 H、
N 几何级数的分解乳糖两种酶标记符号、16 与 9 的数
理组合。
16 个“H”和 9 个“N”排列组合就有 144 种组合；
9 个“N”和 16 个“H”排列组合也有 144 种组合，再
加上变种病毒变异重组就构成一个相当庞大的几何级
数病毒系列命名数据。也就是说， “H1”“N1”合起
来是 1 种病毒，是 Orthomyxoviridae 系列的 1 种 H1N1
病毒。与 H1N1 同一系列的还有 H5N1、H7N2、H1N7、
H7N3、H13N6、H5N9、H11N6、H3N8、H5N2、H4N8、H10N7、
H2N2、H8N4、H14N5、H6N5、H12N5、H9N2、H15N9 等
等……不计其数！这里， “H”“N”病毒“半株”命
名法， “H”与“N”只是一种标记。
“H”号码是“血凝素类型” ；
344“N” 号码是“神经氨酸酶类型” ；事实上，人
类并没有完全认识全部几何级数病毒系列，目前知之
甚少，这符合一个病毒大约需要 10 的 13 次方毕特的
信息才能构成的病毒特异属性！
十一、为什么六界生物普遍遵循“科赫准则”从不逾
越
现代人看陶氏 H1N1 号码为标记的原理：根据 1
个 H 和 1 个 N，包括变种所有上述每一个病毒已经“转
化”变异，成为具有不同致病症状、专属性概况的“H”
与“N”不同组合的各种“半株性”菌株;专属致一种
疾病的微生物病原体的 1 个物种、半株感染只能转换
感染一种专属性传染病。这符合孟德尔到摩尔根定律、
特别是“科赫准则”和麦克林托克“跳跃基因”与“半
株跳跃” 、贝尔纳“内环境”等生物学法则、规律。
这就是为什么六界生物普遍遵循“科赫准则”的
生物本能、规律。
那么，病毒是不是生命呢？
不是生命却能感染生命物；病毒存在一种特异功
能：，病毒随时随地可把遗传物质注入其他生物的活
细胞内进行繁殖，这是病毒特异的感染过程。
病毒非常微小、以纳米计量，只能在电子显微镜
中看到病毒的存在。病毒只是没有细胞结构的六界生
345物，多以病毒外形区分；病毒结构单一：只有①、蛋
白质的外壳，②、内部的遗传物质（DNA 以及 RNA），
即可将病毒分为 RNA 病毒或者 DNA 病毒；其蛋白质外
壳完全是保护病毒内的遗传物质。
现代科学家研究发现，病毒寄生微生物，严格遵
循贝尔纳“内、外环境法则” ，只能在活细胞内生存
繁殖，一旦离开活的细胞就不能独立存活，变成结晶
体。鉴此，感染生命活细胞是病毒存活和繁殖的唯一
方式——病毒同样存在“半株漂移”属性，在陆地、
海洋、天空，地球星系无处不在；人类已经掌握 200
多种已知病毒，人类的各种传染病 80%由病毒引起并
严格遵循“科赫准则”（一直病毒只能感染一种专属
疾病）；比如艾滋病、流行性感冒、天花、SARS、病
毒性肝炎和 1918 西班牙女士大流感、2022 年全球新
冠病毒的大流行等等……不管如何变异总是传播该病
毒“专属疾病” ，且没有治疗病毒（专属疾病）的特
效药物，只能靠提高自身免疫力和专属疫苗。
十二、3000 年病毒对人类的危害史无前例-病毒变异
万变不离其宗且严格遵循“科赫准则”②
竹焚不毁其节！因为一物有一物的本性；
科赫法则是伟大的德国细菌学家罗伯特·科赫
（Robert Koch，1843～1910 年）提出的一套科学验
346证方法，用以验证了细菌与病害的关系，被后人奉为
传染病病原鉴定的金科玉律。它为病原微生物学系统
研究方法的建立奠定了基础，使其成为一门独立的学
科。
科赫法则内容：
1、在每一病例中都出现相 du 同的微生物，且在
zhi 健康者体内不存在；
2、要从宿主分 dao 离出这样的微生物并在培养基
中得到纯培养（pure culture）；
3、用这种微生物的纯培养物接种健康而敏感的宿
主，同样的疾病会重复发生；
4、从试验发病的宿主中能再度分离培养出这种微
生物来。
“科赫法则”归根结底一句话“科赫法则”金科
玉律就是：
“细菌病毒微生物只能感染一种专属性疾病。”
人类瘟疫历史证明：无论是流行长达千年的“黑
死病” ，还是天花、麻疹、埃博拉、猪瘟、H1N1 大流
感、H7N9 禽流感、SARS、疟和 2020 年的 SAR 和 2019
年全球大流行的新冠病毒……无一例外完全遵循“科
赫法则” ；即使新冠病毒自始至终变异，依然始终如
一遵循“科赫法则”！
347事实证明，近 3 年新冠病毒全球大流行以来，英
国变异病毒到印度德尔卡病株，一直到南非奥密克戎
毒株的变异不断升级完全不足为怪，病毒变异都是一
种自然现象——从 2020 年 5、6 月开始，新冠病毒经
历了 4 个 VOC 变异株 Alpha（阿尔法）、Beta（贝塔）、
Gamma（伽玛）和 Delta（德尔塔）；在刺突蛋白的重
要氨基酸突变位点，包括增强细胞受体亲和力和病毒
复制能力的突变位点，进入南非奥密克戎突变毒株，
从流行病学和实验室监测数据显示，南非感染奥密克
戎变异株病例数激增已经部分取代 Delta 变异株——
奥密克戎病毒恐吓没有必要继续发酵，这仅仅是一种
自然现象！
2021 年 11 月 26 日，自世界卫生组织紧急会议，
将南非新变异病毒“奥氏”直接升级为“令人担忧的
突变株”（VOC）至今，奥密克戎病毒恐吓还在发酵：
“CNN 周一的报道显示，至少 17 个国家和地区出现感
染奥密克戎毒株的病例，69 个国家和地区因这一毒株
的出现实施旅行限制。这是一种“缺位基因”表达，
有着多达 32 处变异的奥密克戎，是 Delta 的 4 倍多（德
尔塔毒株的变异有 7 处）。变异！才能漂移；漂移才
可“合体”！合体变异才能“增加位点”奥密克戎毒
株缺少一种可用于鉴别新冠病毒特征的 S 基因，这种
348S 基因会生成毒株上的棘突状蛋白。南非疫情应对与
创新中心主任奥利维拉说： “它在变异上有巨大飞跃，
比我们预期的突变要多得多。”B.1.1.529 存在“不
同寻常的突变群” ，共有 50 个突变，刺突蛋白上有
32 个突变。美国全国公共广播电台称，B.1.1.529 的
突变数量是德尔塔病毒的两倍之多。
12 月 4 日，据路透社网站报道，美国研究人员发
现，变异新冠病毒奥密克戎毒株有至少一处变异由一
种特殊基因片段导致，且这个基因片段存在于其他多
种病毒中，包括一种导致普通感冒的病毒。
奥密克戎毒株感染症状：多数患者都出现了类似
流感的症状，比如干咳、发烧、肢体疼痛等，但住院
病例并没有大幅增加——南非近期病例数飙升的豪登
省经营诊所的资深医生乌本·皮莱指出，最近前来就
诊的新冠患者数量虽然明显增加，但症状普遍较轻（截
止到 12 月 2 日，报告对住院的 42 名新冠患者的主要
观察结果是：大多数患者（29 人）不需要供氧，许多
人没有呼吸道疾病症状。）、南非疫情应对与创新中
心主任奥利维拉说：
【B.1.1.529 存在“不同寻常的突变群” ，共有
50 个突变，刺突蛋白上有 32 个突变。美国全国公共
广播电台称，B.1.1.529 的突变数量是德尔塔病毒的
349两倍之多。】——刺突蛋白是病毒的一部分，大多数
疫苗都用它来启动免疫系统对抗新冠病毒，它也是
“病毒用来打开进入人体细胞大门的钥匙”。
“南非医学研究委员会与南非私人健康保险商
Discovery Health 研究人员说，相比未接种新冠疫苗
人群，完成辉瑞疫苗接种对奥密克戎毒株可起到 33%
的免疫保护作用，对防止感染后发展为重症的保护效
力为 70%。新冠变异病毒德尔塔毒株在南非传播期间，
辉瑞疫苗防止重症的保护效力为 93%。辉瑞疫苗是南
非接种最多的疫苗。研究结果尚未经同行审议。”
——原因很简单： “奥密克戎”完全是在南非的
土壤自然变异产生的，环境决定变异——这就必须从
“种性制约机制”整体生命学基础理论去研究、解析，
寻找答案、破解！
这就叫“一方水土养一方病毒”……到了 2022
年 10 月，奥密克戎毒株仍然不断变异，亚洲日韩出现
奥密克戎 BF.7、BQ.1/BQ.1.1、XBB 等多个变异株并在
全球蔓延，不同变异株间“扩张竞争”均来自新冠（种
性）变异毒株，表现出毒性越来越弱，像一般感冒，
潜伏期平均 3-4 天，最长 14-21 天。这种病毒的传播
性和隐蔽性比 Delta 突变株更强，它在更高的位置影
响呼吸道，病毒复制更快（传播快毒性弱），所以感
350染者的肺部受影响程度更低，所以症状一般较轻可为
感冒——奥密克戎按这样一直变异发展下去，再过两
个月就到年末，据神秘消失律和大疫不过三（年）!
人类进入 2023 年 1、2 月，新冠病毒通过不间断变异
类似感冒病毒，必然“神秘消失”。这是规律！这是
法则！
十三、3000 多年无数病毒危害人类造成巨大灾难
却每一大瘟疫病毒均彰显“神秘消失律”
“神秘消失律”是一个不成文法，是一个定律，
并得到 5000 年全球突变大瘟疫历史证明：
公元前 431 年古希腊爆发黑死病（鼠蚤为媒介，
经人的皮肤传入引起腺鼠疫，经呼吸道传入发生肺炎-
肺鼠疫。），导致公元前 430 年，雅典爆发了大规模
的传染病，约四分之一的雅典人死亡，公元 541 到 542
年，查士丁尼皇帝统治下的拜占庭帝国再一次被黑死
病（鼠疫）屠城、1347 年至 1353 年，黑死病又一次
大爆发，史称：欧洲黑死病；一口气夺走了 2500 万欧
洲人的性命，占当时欧洲总人口的 1/3。
黑死病在公元前 431 年到 1353 年间多次卷土重
来，都严格遵循“科赫准则” ，完全都是单一的鼠疫
病毒，无论瘟疫多么肆虐最终均“神秘消失”！……
再比如，公元 164—180 年，安东尼王朝统治下的
351罗马帝国爆发了伤寒、天花、麻疹以及中毒性休克综
合症等多种瘟疫，但每一种病毒只传染自己的专属疾
病。罗马史学家迪奥卡称，当时罗马一天就有 2000
人染病而死，相当于被传染人数的 1/4；神奇的是，
瘟疫一过，病毒就突然“神秘消失”了！
我们研究上述瘟疫，特别是“1918 年大流感“第
一波”到 7 月突然减速，8 月一整个一月，流感病例
突然“神秘消失”见证了“春瘟疫”到秋天疫情的转
圜；接下来病毒变异 肆虐成为“1918 年西班牙女士
大流感”！……8 月休闲一个月，9 月再爆“西班牙女
士”大流行，更疯狂肆虐欧亚美非大陆，连永冻土的
居民都不放过；疫情经过两个“夏至日”进入晚期，
到第三年初的早春二月，突然“神秘消失”得干干净
净，百年至今没有再出现此病毒！——从历史见证，
我们发现了“突发大瘟疫一般不过第三个夏至（日）
就会突然“神秘消失”——我们把这种现象称作大瘟
疫病毒“神秘消失律”！
2003 年中国突遇 SARS（非典）瘟疫流行秋 19 月
我们发现“神秘消失律”图
3529
十四、太阳磁暴周而复始使病毒“神秘消失”彰显宇
宙大爆炸对生命的亘古印记与证明
宇宙大爆炸 10 亿年冷却后出现太阳，不间断循
环有强烈的太阳磁暴爆发，并伴有强辐射和大量高能
粒子；地磁暴的强度可以表征太阳风暴中高速等离子
353体云的影响大小。地磁暴的强度等级一般用 Kp 指数
和 Dst 指数这两类地磁指数来划分。地磁 Kp=9 为强
地磁暴，发红色警报;地磁 Kp>7 为中等地磁暴，发橙
色警报;地磁 Kp>5 为弱地磁暴，发黄色警报。不同级
磁暴对人体有不同影响，人处在磁暴中会血压突变，
头疼，心血管功能紊乱等等……磁暴对动物的举动变
得具有攻击性，比如老鼠会无缘无故地发火，拼命地
在笼子里跑来跑去，久久都恢复不了正常；对微生物
往往就是灭顶之灾，能够破坏病毒的分子结构，彻底
击断它的分子链，从根本上消灭病毒——这就是世界
多次突发大瘟疫病毒人类无法消灭却在太阳磁暴过
程“神秘消失”的本源。
①、1918 年爆发流行——1918 年 3 月 4 日一处
位于美国堪萨斯州的军营（Camp Funston, Kansas），
但当时的症状只有头痛、高烧、肌肉酸痛和食欲不振
这是第一波的开始，战争导致美军赴欧，感染出现第
二波，从西班牙引爆第三波最烈；流感直接造成全球
10 亿人感染，5,000 万~1 亿人死亡，西班牙女士大流
感结束于 1921 年，因为 1921 年太阳爆发了一次 X 级
别的太阳磁暴，导致流感病毒“神秘消失” 。
②、2002 年 12 月深圳突发 SARS 病毒大瘟疫，
到 2003 年 10 月我们预言非典病毒将“神秘消失”并
354上升到理论，发现“神秘消失律” ；其原因是 2003
年 10 月爆发了太阳磁暴，证明太阳磁暴是 SARS 病毒
的终结者，遂“神秘消失” 。
③、2009 年，爆发于北美、半年内迅速席卷全球
的甲型 H1N1 流感病毒，则是《国际卫生条例（2005）》
颁布后，被世界卫生组织列为的第一起国际关注的突
发公共卫生事件，造成全球 200 个国家和地区一个月
左右感染人数就突破 1 万人。令人奇怪的是，病毒肆
虐持续一年之后，突然神秘消失了——原因又在太阳
磁暴：2010 年 4 月 5 日和 8 月 4 日分别爆发了两次大
级别的太阳磁暴，病毒“神秘消失”世卫组织随即宣
布流感大流行结束。
④、2019 年 12 月 30 日 17 时 48 分左右，李文亮
吹哨：在我院急诊科隔离的华南水果海鲜市场确诊 7
例 SARS 病例（新冠病毒始发），2020 年 3 月 9 日世
界卫生组织确定新冠状病毒全球大流行，一时间新冠
病毒肆虐全球所有国家地区，最新海外疫情：新冠感
染超 6.61 亿，根据约翰斯霍普金斯大学的最新统计
数据，全球新冠肺炎死亡病例已超过 100 万例（截止
2023 年 9 月）；一直到 2023 年 2 月新冠病毒突然“神
秘消失”——2023 年太阳磁暴六天内（1 月 5 日至 11
日）连续爆发了三次最大级别（X 级）的耀斑次太阳
355356
风暴都属于高等级的，其中两次更是达到了 X 级的最
高级别，绝杀了新冠病毒，使新冠病毒在 2023 年早
春二月“神秘消失”！
第十九章 “宇宙大爆炸”原力彰显“整体生命学”
源起
题记：古希腊人柏拉图预知， “地球是一
个巨大活生物体”的推论是宇宙是一个超巨大活
生物体彰显：宇宙地球万物起源一个奇点大爆炸
是“整体生命学”的起源。
这样，我们就可以把霍金宇宙大爆炸理论
整体合宇宙大爆炸整体生命学，进行生命整体“起
源”论述。
一
宇宙整体生命属性大宇宙体系和小宇
宙机制不可分割：
宇宙大爆炸彰显：
小宇宙体系是亿亿细胞膨胀；
大宇宙体系是一种万物膨胀。
……
现代人科学家宇宙大爆炸理论初始，1974—1975
年是霍金引力波探索的开始理解量子引力定律，深刻
理解这些定律揭示黑洞信息和随机性的本质、宇宙的奇异诞生的本质、以及黑洞内奇点的本质——就是时
间的诞生和死亡的本质的开始。
2022 年 7 月 11 日詹姆斯.韦伯太空望远镜彩图证
明宇宙大爆炸的整体性： “星系内的恒星在运动，星系
该身也有自转，星系整体在空间同样在运动。”——由此证
明：宇宙大爆炸整体生命学完全是行星、星系之间的相互作
用，使宇宙地球生命客观世界形成一个有机整体，并处于不
断地运动和变化发展中！
我们生活在一个由理性定律制约的宇宙中，通过
科学，我们可以发现和理解这些定律。
古希腊以来“机体的不可分割性曾使亚里士多德
感到这对物质有限可分性的假设是一种根本性的困
难；在这种假设中，原子论学派企图找到理解在自然
界起着统治作用的秩序——尽管物理现象是形形色
色的，但秩序还是有的。 ”
1628 年哈维提出小宇宙体系和大宇宙体系不可分
割，彰显了普适作用量子所表示的原子过程的不可分
性——“普适作用量子所表示的原子过程的不可分性
这一特色却意味着，在量子物理学中，这一相互作用
是现象的一个不可分割的部分；如果仪器应该起到确
定实验装置和纪录观测结果的作用，这一相互作用就
是不能分别开来加以说明的。这种纪录，例如照相底
357片上由电子撞击而造成的斑点，本质上涉及一些不可
逆过程；这一情况并不给实验的诠释带来特殊的困
难，而是强调了观察概念本身在原理上就已蕴涵着的
那种不可逆性。 ”
宇宙中的无序或熵的总量总是随着时间的推移而
增加。不过，定律仅指无序总量。一个物体的秩序可
以增加，只要其周围的无序量增加得更多即可。
这就是在生物中发生的事情。我们可以将生命定
义为一个有序的系统，该系统可以维持其对抗无序的
倾向，并能复制自身。也就是说，它可以造出类似但
独立的有序系统。要完成这些，系统必须把某种有序
形式的能量，例如食物、阳光或电力转变成热的形式
的无序的能量。以这种方式，系统就可以在满足总的
无序量增加的要求的同时，它自身和它的后代有序量
增加。形成人类和动物“生命以负熵为生”的宇宙整
体生命学演化史。
二 宇宙学原理与人类整体生命学起源休戚相关
假设从地球上看大尺度宇宙是各向同性的，宇宙
学原理可以从一个更简单的哥白尼原理中导出。哥白
尼原理是指不存在一个受偏好的（或者说特别的）观
测者或观测位置。根据对微波背景辐射的观测，宇宙
学原理已经被证实在 10^（-5）的量级上成立，而宇
358宙在大尺度上观测到的均匀性则在 10%的量级。
现代人理论计算的宇宙微波背景辐射峰值频率对
应的辐射强度应该比太阳同频率的辐射强度小 3 个数
量级以上，即小千倍以上。然而，实际观测结果却是
宇宙微波背景辐射峰值强度远大于太阳同频率的辐
射强度；这就充分说明产生宇宙微波背景辐射的辐射
源非表面源而是体积内在源！
因为普朗克黑体辐射公式是以表面源为基础的，
就像太阳辐射谱高度近似 6000K 的黑体辐射一样，这
只是太阳光球层产生的面源辐射并不是体源。于是，
找到了产生“小千倍以上”的“面”与“体”源巨大
差的原因。
事实上，希腊人阿利斯塔克就已经提出日心说的
雏形。现代人在 16 世纪哥白尼建立了完整的日心说
宇宙体系。17 世纪的伽利略用天文观测支持哥白尼学
说，而开普勒发现了行星运动（三）定律，还原宇宙
和谐之终极真理。牛顿的学说将伽利略和开普勒的事
业发扬光大。直至 19 世纪末，牛顿的时空观还一直
被当作科学界的金科玉律，康德把自己对牛顿时空观
的迷惑表述为二律背反。直到大约一百年前的哈勃红
移定律的发现，以及爱因斯坦广义相对论的提出，人
们才大体得到今日之宇宙图像……所有这一切都是
359360
宇宙生命基因秘密亘古天问的智能回答。
人类的智慧、特别是小宇宙体系与大宇宙体系的
智能默契，完全揭示了人体基因密码在宇宙学原理的
真实存在；不同的是：宇宙是在大尺度上观测到的均
匀性 10%的量级，人类是在小尺度上观测到的牛顿金
科玉律，是人肉眼可见；天注定生命和宇宙同样具有
“三维立体”的生命属性，不同的只是微观与宏观和
“微、宏观”的相互渗透！——微观里存在宏观、宏
观里存在微观的繁纷复杂……
三
DNA 传递代际的生命蓝图隐含生命生死
循环无法终结
“DNA 传递代际的生命蓝图。愈加复杂的生命形
式从眼睛和耳朵等传感器输入信息，在大脑或其他系
统中处理信息，决定如何行动，然后向譬如肌肉等输
出信息以作用于外界。在我们 138 亿年的宇宙历史中
的某个时刻，发生了一件美妙的事。这种信息处理变
得如此聪明，以使生命获得意识。我们的宇宙现在已
经醒来，意识到自己。微末如星尘的我们，居然对我
们生活于其中的宇宙有了如此详细的了解，我认为这
是一个胜利”——这已经确认证明宇宙大爆炸在 138
亿年某个时刻开始就存在宇宙基因密码，并按密码
“使生命获得意识” ；也完全说明大宇宙体系和小宇361
宙体系的生命与宇宙大爆炸同源！
那么宇宙中最可能的历史将会有什么样的未来行
为？似乎存在各式各样与智慧生命的出现相容的可
能性。它们取决于宇宙中的物质数量。如果超过一定
的临界量，星系之间的引力将减缓膨胀。如果宇宙的
密度低于临界值，则引力太弱，不足以阻止星系永远
飞离。所有的恒星都会燃尽，而且宇宙将变得越来越
虚空，越来越寒冷。所以，万物又要终结，不过是以
一种不太戏剧化的方式终结而已，我们仍然还有几十
亿年的时间可过。
四
霍金《膨胀宇宙的性质》与小行星威胁
1982 年夏天，现代人霍金和吉本斯在剑桥召开了
极早期宇宙学的会议。这是在该领域影响最深远的会
议。早在 20 世纪 70 年代，狄克等就指出在大爆炸宇
宙模型中存在一些严重问题，如宇宙微波背景因果性
问题、单极子问题，尤其是空间平性问题，后者体现
了宇宙演化对初始条件的极度敏感性。固斯和林德等
认为，如果在大爆炸相前宇宙以指数式膨胀，即存在
一个暴胀相，那么这些问题就可以避免。不过，由于
暴胀的机制或暴胀子不能从第一原理推出，所以不少
人对这个场景抱迟疑态度，认为它只是一个唯象模
型。但是，这次会议取得了一个重要的进展，那就是霍金等人提出，在暴胀背景下，经典无规性很快就被
暴胀抹平，而量子场涨落应是宇宙结构，比如星系团
和星系的籽。事实上，那也正是 8 年前霍金和吉本斯
把对黑洞视界辐射推广到宇宙视界时研究过的量子
涨落。10 年后，宇宙背景探索者卫星探测到由这个涨
落引起的微波背景温度在不同方向的差别。后来 WMAP
和普朗克卫星的观测更证实它和预言精确一致。
“小行星碰撞将成为我们无法防御的威胁。不过
最近一次这样的小行星碰撞大约发生于 6 600 万年
前，并导致恐龙灭绝。更紧迫的危险是气候变化失控。
海洋温度升高会使冰盖融化并导致大量二氧化碳释
放。这两种效应都可以使我们的气候变得像金星一
样，但温度达到 250 摄氏度。 ”
五 量子涨落的宇宙与生命种子“对点”-受精卵
1982 年初，现代人霍金写了一篇论文，提出这些
差异源自于暴胀时期的量子涨落。
发生量子涨落是不确定性原理的结果。此外，这
些波动是形成宇宙中的星系、恒星和我们的种子。这
个思想基本上和我在十年前预言的从黑洞视界来的
霍金辐射机制一样，除了现在它来自于宇宙视界。宇
宙视界是把宇宙中我们能看到的部分和我们看不到
的部分分开的面。那年夏天，我们在剑桥举办了一个
362363
研讨会，该领域的所有主要专家都参加了。在这次会
议上，我们建立了现有的关于暴胀的大部分图景，包
括引起星系形成以及由此我们存在的最重要的密度
涨落。有几个人为最终答案做出了贡献。这是在 1993
年 COBE 卫星发现宇宙微波背景涨落之前的十年，由
此可见理论遥遥领先于实验。
“波动是形成宇宙中的星系、恒星和我们的种子”
——“种子”是一个整体概念。植物的种子和动物的
精卵都完全是宇宙生命整体繁殖的量子涨落。
六
宇宙生命的整体性上帝确实是在掷骰子（爱
因斯坦错了）
现代人认为：再过十年后的 2003 年，宇宙学成为
精密科学，WMAP 卫星得到最初的结果。WMAP 制作了
一幅关于宇宙微波背景天穹温度的精彩天图，是宇宙
在大约当前年龄的万分之一时的快照。你看到的无规
性是被暴胀预言过的，它们意味着宇宙的某些区域的
密度略高于其他区域。额外密度的引力吸引减缓了该
区域的膨胀，并最终导致它坍缩形成星系和恒星。所
以仔细看看微波天穹图，它是宇宙中所有结构的蓝
图。我们是极早期宇宙中量子涨落的产物。上帝确实
是在掷骰子。
今天我们拥有普朗克卫星，它超越了 WMAP，能获364
得具有高得多的分辨率的宇宙天图。普朗克正在认真
测试我们的理论，甚至可能检测由暴胀预言的引力波
的印记。这将是量子引力在整个天穹画出的印记——
上帝不扔色子；爱因斯坦错了！
七
宇宙无限空间之王《至大论》之未来希腊人
的宇宙大爆炸
宇宙本身在炙热大爆炸中的开端是测试 M 理论，
以及时空和物质构件的思想的终极高能实验室。不同
的理论在当前的宇宙结构中留下了不同的指纹，因此
天体物理数据可以为我们提供统一所有自然力的线
索。所以也很可能还存在其他宇宙，但不幸的是我们
永远无法探索它们。
那么宇宙中最可能的历史将会有什么样的未来
行为？似乎存在各式各样与智慧生命的出现相容的
可能性。它们取决于宇宙中的物质数量。如果超过一
定的临界量，星系之间的引力将减缓膨胀。如果宇宙
的密度低于临界值，则引力太弱，不足以阻止星系永
远飞离。所有的恒星都会燃尽，而且宇宙将变得越来
越虚空，越来越寒冷。所以，万物又要终结，不过是
以一种不太戏剧化的方式终结而已，我们仍然还有几
十亿年的时间可过。
在这个回答中，我试图解释一些有关我们宇宙的起源、未来和本性的事情。过去的宇宙是小而密集的，
所以它就很像我开始说的果壳那样。然而这个果壳编
码了在实时间里发生的一切。所以哈姆雷特是完全正
确的。我们可以被束缚在果壳之中，但把我们自己视
为无限空间之王。于是，托勒密《至大论》之未来可
能是希腊人的宇宙大爆炸！
八 宇宙生命的扩展与终结
霍金说，我想稍微推测一下宇宙中生命的发展，
特别是智慧生命的发展。我将把人类也包括在此，尽
管人类在整个历史中的很多行为都是相当愚蠢的，并
未顾及其他物种的存活。我将要讨论的两个问题是，
“宇宙中其他地方存在生命的概率是多少？”“生
命在未来可能会如何发展？”
随着时间的推移，事情变得更加混乱和混沌，这
是大家共同的经验。这种观测甚至有其自己的定律，
即所谓的热力学第二定律。这个定律是说，宇宙中的
无序或熵的总量总是随着时间的推移而增加。不过，
定律仅指无序总量。一个物体的秩序可以增加，只要
其周围的无序量增加得更多即可。
这就是在生物中发生的事情。我们可以将生命定
义为一个有序的系统，该系统可以维持其对抗无序的
365366
倾向，并能复制自身。也就是说，它可以造出类似但
独立的有序系统。要完成这些，系统必须把某种有序
形式的能量，例如食物、阳光或电力转变成热的形式
的无序的能量。以这种方式，系统就可以在满足总的
无序量增加的要求的同时，它自身和它的后代有序量
增加。
最终他们将开始相互吸引，并将在一次大挤压中
聚集在一起。这将是宇宙历史在实时间中的终结。
——本章均摘自霍金《十问沉思录》
九
宇宙大爆炸疆域到底有多大
宇宙、地球、行星、星云、外星系恒星自大爆炸
开始构成的大宇宙疆域到底有多大？
1987 年 2 月 23 日，现代人科学家观测到在距离
地球 18 万光年的一颗超新星大爆炸，恒星表面温度
高达五十万度，以每秒三万公里的速度喷向太空，产
生巨大的光能，亮度短时间超过一个星系，亮度超过
太阳的 1-10 倍。
1946 年英国玛尔文的皇家雷达群，在天鹅星座中
发现了很强的射电源，从而发现了类星体。类星体的
亮度是 1000 个银河系的亮度的总和，每个银河系里
有 1000 亿个太阳，太阳能是核能，类星体的亮度，
能超过 1000 个银河系的亮度的总和，说明类星体的发能方式，远远超过核能，这些外星能量进入太阳系，
自然会影响地球气候变化，只是它比较遥远，十分漫
长，尚不明显——在时间与空间范畴，宇宙的范围大
概在 138.2 亿年的倍数，宇宙自诞生以来无时无刻都
在发生巨大变化，几乎是无边界的啊！因为人类目前
最远观察的距离也只能到 460 多亿光年。从各个方向
进行观察的话，宇宙应该是一个直径高达 920 多亿光
年的球体。 ”
1977 年 9 月 5 日，旅行者一号发射升空，朝着离
开太阳系的方向前进，它途径木星和土星……在 1990
年 2 月 14 日，旅行者一号在距离地球 64 亿公里开外
的地方时，地球上的指挥中心操作着旅行者一号朝着
太阳系中的几大行星拍摄了一组照片，最后在计算机
的合成下，汇聚成了一张太阳系的全家福，在这张照
片当中，很难找到地球的身影，因为距离太远，地球
只有 0.12 个像素点那么大了。也就是说，旅行者一
号距离地球 64 亿公里，但远远没有离开太阳系。
天文学家认为：比银河系更大的宇宙结构是：星
系群。银河系处于本星系群当中，本星系中与银河系
属于同等级别的星系大概有几十个。比本星系群更大
的是超星系群或者超星系团，本星系所在的是室女座
超星系团，与银河系同等级别的星系有 4.7 万个，银
367河系根 是大宇宙中的一粒沙 ，地球知 识沙中之
沫！……
此外，由于宇宙自身加速膨胀和“暗物质”的存
在，人类可观测到的宇宙极限范围是直径为 930 亿光
年的球状空间，被我们称为：可观测宇宙。
1995 年 12 月 18 号，哈勃望远镜被征用 10 天，
用来朝着天球中最暗的一个小小的区域连续曝光了
10 天，得到 3000 多个距离地球非常遥远的星系照，
这些星系都是和银河系一样的天体。而这张照片也被
命名为：哈勃深空。如果宇宙 96%是“暗物质”属实
的话，人类的“可观测宇宙”只有真实宇宙的 4%啊！
宇宙大爆炸疆域到底有多大？的含义是一个时
代和科学技术与未来时间概念——1452 年宇宙处于
哥白尼宇宙原理、1596 年宇宙处于开普勒《宇宙的奥
秘》还原宇宙和谐之终极真理；1926 年哈勃观测到大
约 10 亿个同银河系类似的星系。按照形状和结构可
分：旋涡星系、棒旋星系、椭圆星系和不规则星系，
现代人 科学家认为河外星系 的总数在 千亿个以
上！……
1990 年 2 月 14 日， “旅行者一号”触摸到距离
地球 64 亿公里开外的地方——也就是说，太阳系在
银河系很是微小，太阳位于银河一个支臂猎户臂上，
368至银河中心的距离大约是 2.6 万光年。银河系又名“银
汉”（天河、银河、星河、天汉等……）所在的棒旋
星系，包括 1000~4000 亿颗恒星和大量的星团、星云
以及各种类型的星际气体和星际尘埃，从地球看银河
系呈环绕天空的银白色的环带。总质量约为太阳的
2100 亿倍，隶属于本星系群，银河系有 3 个部分组成，
中心部分核球的直径为 3000 光年,呈椭球形。银盘是
银河系的主体,其直径约 8 万光年,中央厚约 1 万光年,
边缘厚约 3000～6000 光年最近的河外星系是距离银
河系 254 万光年的仙女星系、周围几十万光年的区域
分布着十几个卫星星系，其中较大的有大麦哲伦星云
和小麦哲伦星云；
银河系直径大约 10 万光年，约 4730 亿亿千米、
如果按引力影响算，太阳系的半径可达 2 光年（约
946080 亿千米），直径则是 4 光年，190 亿千米。如
果以冥王星的轨道为边界，那半径是 59 亿千米，直
径是 118 亿千米（约 0.00025 光年）……
河外星系就更是无边无际的宇宙了，最近的河外
星系是距离银河系 4 万 2 千光年的大犬座矮星系——
人类的“旅行者一号”飞了 45 年飞了 230 亿公里还
没有飞出太阳系，需要飞 4 万 2 千光年才能触摸到河
外星系的啊！！！
369十 宇宙大爆炸疆域“韦伯”看到距离地球 7600
光年
“根据 NASA 官网的资料，总共有 5 张图像与公众
见面。其中包括银河系中的系外行星“WASP-96b”的
光谱图，这一行星位于距地球约 1150 光年的南天星座
凤凰座，光谱图首次呈现了该行星有水、雾霾和云等
特征。
韦伯望远镜拍摄的系外行星“WASP-96b”的光谱图（图
片来源：NASA 官网）
370另外一张图展示了距地球约 2000 光年的南环星
云，该星云位于船帆座的一个行星状星云，由中心的
恒星死亡后向外喷发的物质形成，图像展示了这一行
星状星云的全貌；还有位于飞马座的斯蒂芬五重星系，
图像揭示了该星系的超大质量黑洞附近气体的速度和
成分。
最后一张图是船底座星云，图像呈现了其最早期、
快速形成的阶段。船底座星云距离地球 7600 光年，是
天空中最大、最亮的星云之一，拥有许多比太阳质量
大得多的恒星，也是银河系中的一个恒星形成区，新
生的恒星和它们组成的星团被包裹在大量的气体和尘
埃中间。照片中的很多星点，就是正在诞生中的恒星。
371韦伯望远镜拍摄的船底座星云图像（图片来源：NASA
官网）
——引自《史上最强！耗资约 100 亿美元的韦伯望远
镜为何受关注》】
372373
公布的 6 张图，这仅仅是韦伯太空望远镜在
2022 年 3 月 16 正式运行至今，拍摄到距离地球到宇
宙约 1150 光年的南天星座凤凰座、距离地球 7600 光
年船底座星云的银河系中的系外行星“WASP-96b”的
光谱图；在未来的若干年还会有什么神奇莫测的伟大
发现、探明河外星系更遥远的星系边界……
让我们拭目以待！
第二十章
宇宙大爆炸整体生命学生态熵
原理
一 、 大爆炸产生了大量原力能量，它同时也产生同
样多的负能量在地球星系遗留神秘潜行
【大爆炸产生了大量的正能量，它同时也产生同样多
的负能量。通过这种方式，正的和负的加起来总是为零。这
是自然的另一个定律。
那么今天这些负能量在哪里呢？它在我们宇宙食谱
中的第三种成分中：它在空间中。这可能听起来很奇怪，但
根据引力和运动的自然定律——科学中最古老的那些定律
——空间本身就是一个巨大的负能量仓库，足以确保一切加
起来为零。】——霍金《十问沉思录》
生态熵是地球生物群落或种的个体生物能、生物
运动与环境能量相互循环运动的平衡态势。生态熵是
宇宙大爆炸【大爆炸后 1011 秒（104 年），温度约为 105开尔文，物质期。在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形式。
随着宇宙膨胀，电磁辐射的波长被拉长，相应光子能量也跟
着减小。辐射能量密度与尺度（R）和体积（4πR3/3）的乘
积成反比例减小，即安 1/R4 减小，而物质的能量密度只是
简单地与体积成 1/R3 反比例减小。一万年后，物质密度追
上辐射密度且超越它，从那时起，宇宙和它的动力学开始为
物质所主导。】遗留在行星星系地球广宇生存环境与生
物种群与个体、对应环境相适应的能量（有机物和无
机物能量）吸收、释放、相互转换与相对应的小环境
的平衡态势的无限有限无穷集合概念。
用 W 表示区域生态能集合量：W=W1+W2+W3……+WN
的有限无限无穷集合数列。
W 具有宇宙大爆炸整体生命学属性、和与生命物、
地球纬度、经度相适应分布生物能网络态势的“熵”
本能。这是宇宙大爆炸整体生命学生态 W 网络属性的
概念。
二 、 “生命以负熵为生”
生态熵是薛定谔在《生命是什么》一书中（1944
年首次出版）首创，薛定谔通过热力学和量子力学理
论来解释生命的本质，引入非周期性晶体、负熵、遗
传密码、量子跃迁式突变等概念来说明有机体物质结
构、生命的维持和延续、遗传和变异等现象……
374薛定谔说：【生命的典型特征是什么？一块物质什么
时候可以说是活的呢？回答是当它继续“做某种事情” ，运
动，与环境交换物质等等的时候，而且可以指望它比无生命
物质在类似情况下“持续下去”的时间要长得多。当一个不
是活的系统被孤立出来或者被置于均匀的环境中时，由于各
种摩擦力的影响，所有运动通常都很快静止下来；电势或化
学势的差别消失了，倾向于形成化合物的物质也是如此，温
度因热传导而变得均一。此后，整个系统逐渐衰退成一块死
寂的、惰性的物质，达到一种持久不变的状态，可观察的事
件不再出现。物理学家把这种状态称为热力学平衡或“最大
熵”。】
薛定谔继续论述：【那么，我们的食物中到底含有什
么宝贵的东西使我们能够免于死亡呢？这个问题很容易回
答。每一个过程、事件、偶然发生的事——无论叫它什么，
简言之，自然界中正在发生的一切，都意味着它在其中发生
的那部分世界的熵的增加。因此，生命有机体在不断增加自
己的熵——或者可以说是在产生正熵——从而趋向于危险
的最大熵状态，那就是死亡。要想摆脱死亡或者活着，只有
从环境中不断吸取负熵——我们很快就会明白，负熵是非常
正面的东西。有机体正是以负熵为生的。或者不那么悖谬地
说，新陈代谢的本质是使有机体成功消除了它活着时不得不
产生的所有熵。】
375什么是“熵”？薛定谔说：【我提到熵这个术语
的专业定义，只不过是为了驱除经常笼罩在它周围的神秘气
氛。这里对我们来说更重要的是熵对于有序和无序这一统计
学概念的意义，玻尔兹曼和吉布斯（Gibbs）在统计物理学
方面的研究已经揭示了它们之间的关系。这也是一种精确的
定量关系，可以表达为：
熵=klogD
其中k是所谓的玻尔兹曼常数（=3.2983×10-24卡/℃），
D 是对相关物体原子无序性的定量量度。用简短的非专业术
语对 D 这个量做出精确的解释几乎是不可能的。它所表示的
无序，一部分是热运动的无序，另一部分则来自随机混合而
不是清楚分开的不同种类的原子或分子，例如前引例子中的
糖和水分子。这个例子可以很好地说明玻尔兹曼方程。糖逐
渐“扩散”于所有水中就增加了无序性 D，从而增加了熵（因
为 D 的对数随着 D 的增加而增加）。同样清楚的是，提供任
何热量都会增加热运动的混乱，也就是说增加了 D，从而增
加了熵。为什么是这样呢？看看下面的例子就会清楚了：当
你熔化一种晶体时，你破坏了原子或分子整齐而持久的排
列，把晶格变成了一种连续变化的随机分布。】
三 、薛定谔“负熵”概括了法布尔生态熵的宇
宙大爆炸上由来
法布尔生态熵曰： “昆虫埋藏了小粪块，日后
376将有一簇禾本植物因此而长得油绿油绿。一只绵羊通
过这里，将青草叼剪而去。结果，羊的后腿长肉了，
这何尝不是人所希望的呀。食粪昆虫的工业，最终转
换成我们餐叉上的一口鲜美的肉。”
薛定谔总结了法布尔生态能区域平衡现象昆虫
-小粪块-一簇禾本植物-羊-羊腿长肉-食粪昆虫的工
业-我们人生态熵传递现象；于是就自然形成生物熵递
增或递减的连锁效应，构成区域生态能（熵）不断转
圜原理；此原理亘古起源于宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理
论。
从地球看，如果我们把赤道当作地球生态能最大
盆径，从赤道向南北极的环环纬度线就会自然形成双
向（向南极、向北极）螺旋线，以南北极极点为螺旋
线的奇点，便构成了生态熵在地球、地质、地理分布
的复变函数无穷集合的区域熵的有规则排列螺旋线。
由于生态熵是由生物个体和物种群落两个不同又相关
连的软性封闭系统单元生物能量度无穷集合构成，所
以生态熵是十分复杂的动态生物能群落无限有限无穷
集合的态势平衡分布效应的平衡式。鉴此，诞生了薛
定谔“生命以负熵为生”法则！
四、迈尔现代人科学家发现生态熵随地球纬度熵
变化原理
377对于这种生态能的旋线认识是现代德国医生迈尔
在 1840 年的一次航海中发现的。这年迈尔作为随船医
生、参加了一艘轮船从菏兰向东印度的航行。漫长的
海上航行、轮船从北纬 53 度的阿姆斯特丹经英吉利海
峡向北穿过赤道的热带地区，迈尔发现海员、水手的
静脉血的颜色产生了明显变化，比出航时在欧洲更红。
当时迈尔对这种现象的解释是从能量守恒、能量转化
的研究视窗认识的，他认为船员水手静脉血在赤道变
红是因血液含氧增多，在热带高温（赤道）环境中，
船员、水手只需要吸收食物中较少的热量，使血中滞
留了较多的氧，得出了人的体热和肌肉的机械功的能
量都来源于同一的食物的化学能，机械能、热能和化
学能是等价的，是能够相互转化的理论。实际上迈尔
已经发现了生态能螺旋线分布法则。船员、水手的静
脉血变红是遵循着从北纬 90--50--0 度（赤道）的生
态能熵值螺旋线变化法则而变化的，迈尔用人体静脉
血随螺旋线生态能熵值改变血的红色，已经发现了生
态能（熵）原理——负熵是随纬度变化而变化的。
于是，这种生态能原理产生生态差异是随处可见
的自然现象，证明了“生命以负熵为生”法则与地球
共生属性。
五、人间四月芳菲尽，山寺桃花始盛开
378中国最早对生态熵球域差别的认识和科学性描述
该是古代唐朝大诗人白居易。他在《游大林寺》中有
这样的名句；
“人间四月芳菲尽，山寺桃花始盛开。”
三百年后宋代大科学家沈括对此句反复吟哦，特
意在四月到泉州郊外一座山峰去实地考察，确实看到
挑花始盛开的奇异生态。沈括悟出了生态能山上山下
的温度剪刀差是产生这种自然现象的原因，从而用生
态能原理科学地解释了白居易描写的大自然生态奇异
的自然现象。
流传更早的生态熵故事是我国春秋战国时吴王在
御花园看见的“螳螂捕蝉、黄雀在后”的大自然现象。
另有几千年中国流传的民谚： “大鱼吃小鱼，小
鱼吃虾米，虾米吃草泥”更深刻的阐述了 1935 年英国
生态学家坦斯烈提出的生态系统的理论，其后对生态
系统或植物群落“熵”的均衡或关连平衡状态……
现代美国生物学家林德曼提出了生物链的概念。
虽然这种生态系统和生物链理论表述了大自然生物物
种与环境的依存循环途径和生存斗争、自然选择中互
相调节，维持着球域生态熵和小环境熵相对平衡的无
处不在的微生态系统概念。
六、应用量子力学定量分析熵出于宇宙大爆炸
379生态熵“摇篮”——“如果你把一粒沙放在一
臂远的指尖上，这就是你正看到的宇宙的一部分——
不过是宇宙中的一个小点。”——美国航天局局长比
尔·纳尔逊 11 日在介绍韦布空间望远镜拍摄的首张全
彩宇宙深空图像时如此比方。也就是说，望远镜看这
片宇宙区域，相当于我们看指尖上的一粒沙。
“一粒沙”原理同样彰显出“熵原理”！正如薛
定谔所说： “非物理学家觉得很难相信，被他视为高度精
确之典范的日常物理定律，竟然以物质走向无序状态的统计
学倾向为基础。我在第一章已经举过例子。其中涉及的一般
原理就是著名的热力学第二定律（熵原理）及其同样著名的
统计学基础。”
从 2000 年前人们从蝉、螳螂与黄雀的生态现象认
识到沈括的四月山寺挑花盛开，直到达尔文的猫、鼠、
蜂、草、牛、人的准生态能原理、再从法布尔（法布
尔说： “昆虫埋藏了小粪块，日后将有一簇禾本植物
因此而长得油绿油绿。一只绵羊通过这里，将青草叼
剪而去。结果，羊的后腿长肉了，这何尝不是人所希
望的呀。食粪昆虫的工业，最终转换成我们餐叉上的
一口鲜美的肉。”）到迈尔的赤道旋线生态能变异现
象、到斯坦烈的生态系统和林德曼的生物链……都是
以宇宙大爆炸整体生命学息息相关；整体的物种和生
380命活的个体宏观自然选择、生存斗争现象为研究对象
的群落性系统或生物区域生态熵分布理论；对生态熵
的表述也只是宏观的食物或营养物的链性现象，所强
调的是生态系统的食物熵能量流动和物质循环维持着
的相对平衡，这是由各类生物成员（个体）和它所处
的环境吸取序之间存在着能动的相互关联和自我维持
“生态熵”调节控制的能力。事实上， “生态熵”出
于宇宙大爆炸“摇篮”——“韦伯空间望远镜提供的
图像拥有 1.5 亿像素并提供了该致密星系群的丰富细
节。四个紧邻星系相互之间的引力作用使得星系内部
的气体与尘埃被抛出本星系，扰动后的气体尘埃同样
也是恒星诞生的摇篮。”
七、 “生态熵”星系动因出自宇宙大爆炸整体“熵”
原力不间断地持续膨胀与存留
生态熵表述完全不能离开宇宙地球生物物种和生
物个体与球域星系“熵”的整体性；因为生物链只是
一种个体和群落生态熵球域平衡现象，形成这种现象
的动因在于宇宙大爆炸“熵”原力存留、和“熵”球
域普遍分配原理，和宇宙大爆炸星系地理生态螺旋线
网络态势平衡的内在关联规律。
生态熵理论的本质不仅仅只强调系统的整体性，
用整体的（生物）个体作为系统的要素，对这种两个
381以上相互联系的要素的整体概念只做了粗线条的链性
（食物）描述，并没有把任何生命物个体和生命、生
态、自身的复杂系统性状态的变化和动力状态变化的
层面（DNA、细胞、器官、组织）系统相互变异的能（熵）
统一，并深入到宇宙大爆炸整体生命学和能量微循环
的法则中去。
对宇宙客观地观察，这一切已经得到韦伯太空望
远镜彩照的证明——生命本身就是一个复杂的整体系
统，每个生命个体都是复杂的系统层面（DNA、细胞、
器官、组织、个体）系统。由这样生命状态变化系统
组成的物种群落的“熵”层面就更复杂、仅仅以生物
或群落作为系统要素反映的生物特定结构能量运动状
态变化机制，显然忽略了宇宙能量微循环和生物型核
反应的“系”与“统” ；这种“系”与“统”网络是
生物个体微观生态熵延续哈维《心血运动论》发现人
体毛细血管，使血液循环微网得到网状态永无休止的
微循环机制，是维系小宇宙体系旋线生态熵网络平衡
的宇宙大爆炸元熵——这就是宇宙大爆炸初始“原力”
在宇宙星系地球以“原子”（能）悄悄普遍存留的巨
大宇宙“负熵”！
第二十一章、 “化石”是宇宙大爆炸整体生
命学地球生物年轮的生命起源
382“时间窗”人为造假化石链必须
彻底摈除
一、宇宙大爆炸整体生命学理论颠覆以往 3000 年古希
腊至今的科学化石理论
现代人霍金宇宙大爆炸理论在 2022 年 7 月 11 日
得到韦伯太空望远镜发回的彩照证明：
詹姆斯韦伯太空望远镜拍摄的一张令人惊叹的图像让
我们看到了迄今为止最清晰的车轮星系。
这张车轮及其伴星系的图像是由韦伯的近红外相机
(NIRCam) 和中红外仪器 (MIRI) 合成的。这张图片显
示了车轮星系旁边的两个“较小的伴星系，背景是许
383多其他星系。”美国宇航局表示，该图像显示车轮星
系有一个明亮的内环和一个周围的彩色环，这是一个
大型螺旋星系和一个较小星系之间高速碰撞的结果，
车轮星系位于约 5 亿光年外的雕刻家星座中——行
星“高速碰撞”诞生到塌陷死亡是行星彩照生命的历
史见证；确认了地球生物“小宇宙体系”形成进入宇
宙大爆炸整体生命学理论新纪元。它将像恩格斯所说
的“这是人类以往从来没有经历过的一次最伟大的、
进步的变革，是一个需要巨人并且产生了巨人的时代，
那是一些在思维能力、激情和性格 方面，在多才多艺
和学识渊博方面的巨人。给资产阶级的现代统治打下
基础的人物，决没有市民局限性。相反，这些人物都
不同程度地体现了那种勇于冒险的时代特征。”——
看到了吧！21 世纪人类又一个伟大科学“那种勇于冒
险的时代特征。”开始了！她将颠覆以往 3000 年古希
腊至今 20 世纪几乎所有科学理论原理——特别是要
摈弃伽利略“实验科学”以人工选择“钢化法”研究
产生的科学理论原理和不符合大自然宇宙大爆炸真实
存在非自然的事实说明与诠释！
对那些时间跨度非常久远的“史前文明” 、考古
学、化石学说、古生物学等等……特别是对达尔文《物
种起源》进化论编造的人类都是从古猿类进化而来的
384虚假理论；说什么大约在 3,500 万年前，人类开始迁
移、转变，森林古猿和南方古猿一致被认为是人类的
祖先“猴子变人”的所谓学说，人类将用用最伟大的
“那种勇于冒险的时代特征”进行彻底清算！——回
归到“宇宙大爆炸整体生命学”的科学轨道中来。
正如薛定谔把物理学、量子力学整合到宇宙生命
学那样“只有普遍性才是唯一可打满分的。可是近 100
多年来，知识的各种分支在广度和深度上的扩展使我
们陷入了一种奇异的两难境地。我们清楚地感到，一
方面我们现在还只是刚刚开始获得某些可靠的资料，
试图把所有已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整体；可
是，另一方面是，一个人想要驾御比一个狭小的专门
领域再多一点的知识，也已经是不可能的了。”——
序言《生命是什么》薛定谔；这就是把宇宙大爆炸整
体生命学整合到“已知的知识综合成为一个统一的整
体”的 21 世纪科学历史必然！
特别是 2022 年 7 月 11 日詹姆斯.韦伯太空望远镜
6 彩图公布完全证明宇宙大爆炸的整体性，曰： “星
系内的恒星在运动，星系该身也有自转，星系整体在
空间同样在运动。”——由此证明：宇宙大爆炸整体
生命学完全是行星、星系之间的相互作用，使宇宙地
球生命客观世界形成一个有机整体，并处于不断地运
385动和变化发展中！
她将改变和颠覆以往 5000 年古希腊至今的科学
理论原理首先是“化石学说”！
二、地球化石链的人造属性背离了宇宙大爆炸整体生
命学
人类化石发现简述：
在 1911 年和 1913 年，现代德国考古学家汉斯·雷
克（Hans Reck）就在非“奥杜威峡谷”有重要发现；
2000 年法国科学家皮克福德在肯尼亚中部图根
山区发现了两件下颌骨残骸，3 件股骨，1 件肱骨等为
5 个个体化石，定为人科系统，距今 600 万年命名代
像人——原初人图根种。
2001 年 7 月英国《自然》杂志，发表新发现与南
方？猿相似的地猿始祖种始祖兵种据今 580 万—520
万年出现塞俄的亚东北部中阿瓦什地区。
2002 年法国科学家布汝耐，在中非乍得北部沙漠
地区，发现托麦人——生命的希望（人类分离后最早
的人科）时间定在 700 万——600 万年。
于是古人类学家，自认为开创了古生物学，为人
类描绘出一幅人类进化（人造化石链）人猿分离的时
间表，即：
托类人——代像人——地猿——直立——？猿—
386—砖人——直立人——智人——现代人。
这是一个跌宕昭彰的人造“化石链” ，因为它与
宇宙大爆炸整体生命学、地球年龄毫无相关； “化石
链”的唯一指向是达尔文进化论的“从猿到人”！最
典型都是：
现代人路易斯·利基三代（利基家族三代组成的：
路易斯·利基（Louis Leakey，1903-1972）和玛
丽·利基（Marry Leakey，1913-1996）夫妇以及他们
的儿子理查德·利基和儿媳米薇·利基（Meave Leakey）
夫妇。）利基三代发现的化石：
1、1959 年的一天，利基发烧留在营地，玛丽独
自前往 FLK 搜寻化石，找到了一块下颌骨，简单的清
理后惊喜地发现，这个带有牙齿的下颌骨相当古老，
随后的挖掘中又发现了数百个头骨碎片，这些碎片后
来被证实距今 175 万年的历史，这个被利基夫妇称为
“亲爱的男孩”。
2、1961 年，利基和玛丽的儿子在奥杜威峡谷又
发现了一种古老化石，并将其命名为能人（Homo
habilis）。
3、1964 年，路易斯找到了近代人种－“灵敏人”
的石器遗存。
4、1978 年，玛丽在腊妥利（位于坦桑尼亚）发
387现距今 350～380 万年的原始人脚印，其代表正是人类
学家唐纳德·约翰逊 4 年前在埃塞俄比亚发现的南方
猿人露西。
5、利基儿子理查德·利基（Richard Leakey）及
其太太梅维·利基（Meave Leakey）在肯尼亚北部的
图尔卡纳湖周围，发现了大量原始人类化石。
6、利基孙女露易丝·利基（Louise Leakey）则
发现了肯尼亚平脸人（Kenyanthropus platyops）化
石。——这些化石从距今 175 万年、距今 350～380
万年的原始人脚印年代不等……并不是自然体系的
“化石链”。这里的距今 175 万年到 350～380 万年和
宇宙大爆炸的 138 亿年，在宇宙“时间轴”上连海陆
变迁的时间都不够，还谈什么化石呢？
三、利基“化石链”没有丝毫宇宙大爆炸整体生
命学痕迹完全是人为伪造的“化石链”
事实上， “托类人——现代人”完全是一个人伪
造的地球化石链，没有自然系统的真实，完全缺失宇
宙大爆炸整体生命学早期历史见证。
主要原因是：
一、如果从托麦人到智人每隔 100 万年人类演化一个
阶梯的话，在每两个阶梯间隔的 100 万年中没有任何
演化，大自然不会有每 100 万年演化一个阶梯的均衡
388行为与海陆变迁特别是“大爆发”相背离。
二、托麦人、代像人、地猿、直立、古猿、能人、直
立人、智人、现代人，每一演化阶梯的命名人猿混同，
到底是人是猿概念不清；人猿到底在那一阶梯分离不
可知？700 万年到 600 万年是人，500 万年到 300 万年
是猿，2003 年到 100 万年又是人！……给人的确切印
象是：人变成了猿又变成了人。有如此 100 万年“海
陆变迁”的宇宙大爆炸频率吗！？
三、化石拼凑才能在 700 万年的时间中产生的 7 个演
化阶梯
在这 700 万年的时间中产生的 7 个演化阶梯的代
表化石都是破碎的，由几个人生命个体在不同地点拼
揍起来的，从出土至今化石地位都处在争论之中，是
人？是猿没有确凿完整的证据可依，完全是任意用不
同地段破碎的化石拼凑而成！
四、据理查德·利基的定论，此系猿人迁徙和“东非
人”一样，应该是一个灭绝了的人种；于是在古人类
学家给定的时刻表中直立人位置就完全是一个空白
点，因为东非人和北京人是唯一的直立人代表，当这
两个演化阶梯的代表都在灭绝自然没有后代延续，这
个化石年轮时刻表就应改为能智人——现代人，如果
从猿到人没有直立的标记！？猴子不站立起来将永远
389不能演化成现代人。
五、如果人类手和臂的解放以及稳定的直立是有利的
变化——那么我认为没有理由否认如果重视生存的直
立或双足行走可以进一步得到发展将会更加有利演化
的现代人！否则，在手和臂习惯地自由运动与支撑身
体的重量——被专门用来攀援，手和臂不会完善到足
以制造武器，有力量地投掷石块和矛的话，没有直立
一切都是枉然。
结论：利基的第一阶段直立行走和第二阶段适应
附设——这种人为的地球化石链完全不符合宇宙大爆
炸整体生命学时间进化年轮，更和寒武纪生命“大爆
发”相悖！
四、 “化石链”建立在错误的达尔文进化论基础
理论之上存在太多人为想象非科学痕迹
达尔文《物种起源》全名《论依据自然选择即在
生存斗争中保存优良族的物种起源》（On the Origin
of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the
Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle
for Life）林奈协会自认为是英国生物学家查尔斯·达
尔文系统阐述生物进化理论基础的生物学著作，1859
年 11 月 24 日在伦敦出版。
71 年后的 1930 年，利基完成了博士学位，受达
390尔 文 鼓 惑 1931 年 前 往 非 洲 东 部 的 奥 杜 威 峡 谷
（Olduvai Gorge）进行广泛的田野调查——也就是
说，利基晚达尔文 72 年开始化石考古，却把三代科学
考古完全建立在达尔文进化论根基之上；带有过多达
尔文想当然的臆断，完全背离了现代经典基因学——
孟德尔 1865 年发行遗传学三定律，孟德尔将其研究的
结果整理成论文在《植物杂交试验》发表未能引起当
时学术界主流重视；1900 年来自荷兰的德弗里斯、德
国的科伦斯和奥地利的切尔马克同时独立地“重新发
现”孟德尔遗传定律。1931 年去非洲的利基不可能一
点点都不知道 ！？？
事实上，基因平行转缓与经典的达尔文进化论相
冲突。生命演化不是线性的，而是非线性的大爆发。
达尔文生物进化论认为：生物进化经历了从水生
到陆地、从简单到复杂、从低级到高级的漫长的演变
过程，这一过程是通过自然选择和遗传变异两种规律
缓慢滚动逐渐实现的；达尔文的时间久远缓慢进化受
到科学理论和古生物学、人类学的最新发现构成根本
性挑战。
五、达尔文进化论完全背离埃迪卡拉-澄江-布尔
吉斯 3 个动物群（生命大爆发）化石之间的整体突变
演化
391从地球生命特别是从人类物种窗框看，生命爆发
往往是偶然生物事件。这从 5.05 亿年加拿大布尔吉斯
生物群，位于加拿大的大不列颠哥伦比亚省，约为
5.05 亿年前的中寒武世，约有 119 属 140 种海洋动物、
发现节肢动物优势种群，还有海绵、蠕虫、腕足、棘
皮、脊索动物等的软体深海动物化石群——就这样现
代人维尔卡特把生命起源推到五亿年前。
在现代中国在 20 世纪未“1984 年 7 月 1 日， “澄
江生物群”在云南省澄江县首次被发现，这一多门类
动物化石群动物类型众多，且十分珍稀地保存了动物
软体构造，首次栩栩如生地再现了远古海洋生命的壮
丽景观和现生动物的原始特征，以丰富的生物学信息
为“寒武纪大爆发”研究提供了直接证据”。
事实胜于雄辩！加拿大布尔吉斯生物群和云南“寒
武性生命大爆发”古生物化石杂群完全颠覆了达尔文
自下而上倒锥形演化理论模型，为自上而下的爆发式
理论模型提供了化石证据，并展现了埃迪卡拉-澄江-
布尔吉斯 3 个动物群之间的整体演化“生命大爆发”
清晰脉络！
六、利基人为泡制的第二阶段化石链完全不是林
奈的自然体系
现代古生物学家普遍认为：人类的文明只有 5000
392多年，但地球已经存在了 50 多亿年，那么这 50 多亿
年，地球又发生了什么天地轮回的巨变呢？
埃迪卡拉-澄江-布尔吉斯 3 个动物群之间的整体
演化“生命大爆发”存在脉络清晰的“间断平衡”。
“间断平衡”彻底颠覆了达尔文及新达尔文主义
者所强调“一个缓慢的连续渐变积累过程” ；而是长
期的稳定(甚至不变)与短暂的剧变交替过程的突然打
爆发，这样才能解释地质记录中留下许多（化石）空
缺。鉴此，利基家族“化石链”自然存在过多人为色
彩。
利基家族三代被称为“古人类学研究第一家族” ，
创立了“三阶段”化石链，同样背离了“间断平衡”
且利基第三阶段更不符合现代基因学，现代科学家研
究表明，人的大脑在 1603—1607 万年直到今天没有明
鲜的变化，也就是说在 1603 万年以前人脑已达到了演
化极限。这和前面所提到的人类在 500 万年前已经存
在完整的 6 个图文结构是相一致的，从基因论去认识
这种史前人类的高度智能性的例证更多；事实上，人
类25000个基因的稳定时间超过了30亿年基本没有改
变。人类朋肠杆菌的存在可以追溯到 30 亿年前，没有
改变。
基因科学家苏万册、奥尔德里奇对此强调说：
393“事实上，基因的传递并没有什么特别，它已经
存在几十亿年了。它的应用能力来自人类对它的控制，
而不是演化的盲目性”。
现代解剖学研究证明，人脚部生来就是直立行走
的构造、结构；人体 206 块骨骼不能因为演化多一块，
也不能因演化少出一块；人脚的骨骼比例完全是按着
黄金分割律生就的；完全是一个最不合理的无理数的
合理结构。达·芬奇著名人体黄金分割本来图就可完
全证明。也就是说，人脚从来没有过攀登功能，正如
亚里士多德所说： “牛长了角就不会生上长牙，我们
不能说牛角是由长牙演化来的。”所以，根本不存在
利基第二阶段的直立行走的适应附设化石——充其量
完全是化石造假！
七、利基人为泡制的第三阶段化石链完全不存在
化石自然体系
第三阶段更不符合现代科学研究宇宙大爆炸整体
生命学客观史实；
2022 年 8 月 1 日，一项发表于美国《国家科学院
院刊》的研究发现，在过去 16 万年中，人类颅骨的物
理变化可能由饮食和生活方式改变引起的面部变化所
驱动，而非此前认为的由大脑本身的演化所引起。人
类的“脑壳”自 20 万年前到现在，在大小上没有太大
394的变化，但形状却有很大的不同——随着时间的推移，
大脑变得更圆了。
也就是说，人类在 500 万年前已经存在完整的 6
个图文结构是相一致的，从基因论去认识这种史前人
类的高度智能性的例证更多，事实上人类 25000 个基
因的稳定时间超过了 30 亿年基本没有改变。人类朋肠
杆菌的存在可以追溯到 30 亿年前，没有改变，这印证
了“虽然 16 万年前智人儿童头骨的大小和比例在很大
程度上与今天儿童的头骨相当，但那时的成年人头骨
与现代成年人头骨明显不同，前者面部更长，特征更
明显。”颅骨没有明显变化。
总之，我们今天的现代人类必须跳出海克尔“猿
人”的误区，站在宇宙大爆炸历史的高度，跨越经典
的人类起源理论利基四阶段理论权威，引入宇宙大爆
炸整体生命学理论，才能真正开启符合宇宙大爆炸历
史史籍的 21 世纪“整体生命学”！
八、5000 年古生物学史永远找不到海克尔的“猿人”
1889 年，海克尔在研究了尼人化石后认为，在猿
与人之间还存在着一种过渡阶段，这一过渡阶段的生
物命名为猿人（Pithecanthropus）；3 年后，荷兰军
医杜布瓦（Dubois，1858-1940）根据海克尔的观点在
爪哇（Java）发现了著名的爪哇猿人（Pithecanthropus
395Javanicus，史称： “直立猿人 Pithecanthropus
erectus）化石。”
1894 年，杜布瓦发表了正式的学术论文，提出爪
哇猿人是现代人类的祖先。事实上，率先提出猿人一
词的是德国生物学家海克尔，乃达尔文演进化论的忠
实追随者，因而认为人类的祖先是古猿与现代人种之
间的既像猿又像人的一个过渡类型，这完全是东拼西
凑、胡编乱造的“直立猿人”化石。133（2022 年-1889）
年过去了，古生物学历史谁也没有再找到海克尔的“猿
人”化石，更没有找到“直立猿人”后续化石。永远
都找不到。
人类就是人，永永远远一诞生出来就是人！“龙
生龙凤生凤，耗子生来会打洞。”人是人！人不能变
成猴子，猴子不能变成人！“人是猴子变的”在宇宙
大爆炸整体生命学的新纪元，海克尔“猿人”化石永
远不会出现，连同达尔文杜撰的演化进化论完全被颠
覆，且永远被钉在科学历史的耻辱柱与唯物苟延残
喘！……
九、诡秘的“核桃钳人”不能改变整体生命突然
大爆发“间断平衡”突变论
1959 年 7 月 17 日，现代人玛利·利基在东非峡
谷的位置发现了一个粗状南方古猿的头骨和一根小腿
396骨，命名为包氏东北人，她认为是普通的粗水型南方
古猿，并命名为“核桃钳人” ；命名原因出于化石颌
骨粗状，外形像压碎核桃的钳子，用钾—氢法测定年
代距今 180 万年，定性为南方古猿。这就是古人类学
想当然的新突破。
南方古猿180万年的存在史和寒武纪5.05亿年化
石群埃迪卡拉-澄江-布尔吉斯 3 个动物群之间的整体
演化“生命大爆发”的时间点差值万万，和生命大爆
发的“间断平衡”没有任何演化微小可言；到了 180
万年就蹦出来一个“核桃钳人”。且 1960 年竟出现东
非人？骨发掘点附近层位最上界以下 6 米多的地层，
发现一个小孩的头盖（顶）骨和下颌骨及一个成人骨，
一足骨，不在同一层位？竟然发现了一头骨。1964 年
对这些拼凑化石鉴定命名为“能人” ，从脑量计算认
定是的“东非人”更为进步的人这里面存在一个矛盾
的提法，认为是普通的南方古猿粗状型又叫“东非人” ，
是人是古猿混淆不清； “能人”比“钳人”的脑量大，
认定是比“东非人”更为进步的人，如果把“东非人”
三个字变成等号的“南方古猿” 、 “能人”是古猿还
是人呢？漏洞百出……
诡秘的“核桃钳人”不能改变生命突然大爆发“间
断平衡”
397十、利基的“东非人”可变成“鲍氏南方猿人”
利基的化石就这样可以变来变去造假
1976 年利基的“东非人”首先我们对坦桑尼亚奥
杜斋发现的“东非人”在此后改为鲍氏南方猿人的先
人后猿的定位很难理解，同时这一改名更证明了“东
非人”是猿不是人的事实。1976 年玛利·利基小组又
有新的发现。在大约 400 万年前沉积的火山灰发现了
人科成员的是？，有成人和小孩的？而宽的足印，据
说利基夫妇和其子理查德利基，还发现了保存很好的
完整的人科化石，1972 年又发现了编号为 KNM—
ER1470 号头骨化石认定为“能人”一类，从 200 万年
左右的时间上看不可能是“直立人”。到此，考古学
家并没有找到是人又是猿的海克尔“猿人”。非洲不
能证明有人类的祖先“类人猿”存在过。
十一、100 多年人类学家在按图骥“猿人”去对
号（四阶段）入座赫胥黎的“人是猴子变的”
1975 年考古界有一个重大发现，发现了一个“古
墓地” ，估计是某种灾害事件夺去了 15 个人的生命，
其中有 4 个儿童，其余是成人，考古界称为“第一个
家庭” ，但无法证明 13 个人之间的血统，约翰森分析
了化石的特征把它归于阿法种，但至今没有一致的意
见，有三种不同意见：A 南方古猿阿法种；B 南方古猿
398非洲种；C 人属。意见不能统一又怎能成为科学事实
来证明猿人的存在呢？这反映出了 100 多年人类学家
在按图骥“猿人”对号（四阶段）入座，都经历着共
同自相矛盾现象。
事实上， “古墓地”化石只有上面 A、B、C 三种
可能！也就是说，一个化石群只能可选其一种，因为
不能确定“古墓地”真实的化石年代、是人是猿的本
来面目，就无法用来证明海克尔的“猿人”存在的事
实，更不能成为确凿的人或者猿真实存在过的化石证
据。
现代古人类学家从化石发现一开始 300 多年来，
就是这样激烈的争论着，发现者自己也往往是反复无
常，前后矛盾，贝尔说就在于化石的破碎不完整，更
大的难点是他们不知道自己按四阶段寻找的“猿人”
是世界上根本就不存在的啊！地球从来没有存在过的
东西，只能是海克尔与杜布哇杜撰出来的梦！
这就是化石造假案以假乱真，屡禁不绝，无法成
为令人信服的科学方法（论）因缘。
十二、现代皮尔唐化石惊世造假案始末
1859 年达尔文《物种起源》问世，虽然在英国也
出土了种种恐龙化石，唯独没有类似的古人类化石；
这有辱维多利亚女皇辉煌岁月
3991907 年 10 月在德国海德堡大学教授奥托·舒藤
萨克收到附近发现的一块头骨，经鉴定改头骨距今已
达 30 多万年。该发现在人类学上在当时是无可争议的
重大发现。于是。英国和欧洲各国开始了一场挖掘寻
找古人类化石的竞争——大英帝国岂能落伍！？
1912 年 1 月 18 日年英国伦敦地质协会举行例会。
会议上，年龄 48 岁的律师查·达森 (C. Dawson)，宣
布在 4 年前，在 1908 年发现了古人类头骨；地质协会
的主席，大英博物馆地质部的主管爵士阿·史·伍德
沃特 (A. S. Woodward）在会上亟不可待地宣布，在
伦敦南部苏塞克斯附近 d 皮尔唐发现的头骨已经修
复。头骨显示，除了枕部，它在多个方面接近现代人。
其脑容量是现代入三分之二，这个头骨就成为是人类
从猿进化到现代入中不可缺少的 一环……
这就是震惊世界的“皮尔唐人头骨化石”造假案！
1915 年法国古人类学家马·波尔（M. Boule）指
出，人不会有此下颚，应该属猩猩。美国动物学家
吉·史·米勒也指出，下颚化石是猩猩的。
1923 年德国解剖学家弗兰茨·维登来希指出，该
头骨来自三种不同物种。
1953 年奥克利（K. Oakley 等人采用了新发展
的化学分析法，对皮尔唐人头骨再次进行检测。证明
400查·达森的头骨是彻头彻尾的造假。头骨是三种不同
物种的拼凑。一块是中世纪人头骨，一块是只有 500
年历史的红毛猩猩的下颚，还有一块是猩猩的牙齿化
石。
1996 年，在大英博物馆的旧箱子里找到了造假
的重要证据。据《发现》杂志报道，这个箱子装有一
些骨化石，而且被浸在酸溶液内，为测定其年代还有
锰和氧化铁处理过。这些与皮尔唐人的造假头骨特征
相符。
为了证明达尔文进化论、证明赫胥黎的“从猿
到人”的“化石缺环” ，英国地质学会不惜造假，炮
制“皮尔唐人头骨化石”惊天假案，蒙骗全世界、全
人类，却反证了“人不是猴子变的”古生物学结论！
十三、杜布哇拼凑伪造“直立猿人”丑闻
人类学家在找不到是猿人化石，又找不到人与猿
人之间的过渡化石证据，就苦心积虑开始打“直立人”
化石算盘，希望梦想成真。杜布哇就从“直立人”特
征去寻找突破口，希望达到和海克尔猿人的缺环化石
证词；这里，杜布哇的直立猿人就成为皮尔唐后假化
石的代表作！
荷兰的年轻医生杜布哇年轻时求学德国，特别深
受英国达尔文进化论思想影响，突发奇想地相信在印
401度尼西亚地区可以找到人类主先，遂去印尼寻找好梦，
莫名其妙地趋使 350 个犯人在爪哇的梭罗河沿岸搜
索，显然是一种按达尔文进化论图（四阶段）索骥的
经典案例。
1890 年在东爪哇的凯登布鲁伯斯的地方发现和
找到一块下颌骨，第二年在特里尼尔村发现了一头盖
骨，第三年又发现了一根大腿骨，三者拼凑在一起构
成了“直立猿人”的化石证据。杜布哇想当然地认为
头骨和大腿骨是一体的，便在 1894 年发表有关论文，
认为自己找到了直立人化石，称为“直立猿人”!
没想到引发了考古界一场激烈巨大争论，争论焦
点：拼凑的头骨和大腿骨化石（在不同时间相差 1 年、
不同地方找到的）是猿？是人？
专家质疑大腿骨和头骨不属于一种人类，更觉得
化石的地质时代有问题，甚至有人觉得这些骨头是现
代人的某些畸形儿产物。古生物学家们经过考察对化
石的地质年代特别怀疑，尤其是猿人的头骨和人的大
腿骨合二为一体的拼凑，让古生物学家无法想象，认
为没有任何科学价值……也就是说：人类学家普遍对
“直立猿人”不予承认，根本不能成为海克尔猿人的
化石证据。
132 年过去了，1940 年杜布哇（1858 年-1940 年）
402已经离开人世；至今“直立猿人”的起始年代仍然得
不到科学确认，猿人的头骨和人的大腿骨合二为一体
这是皮尔唐化石造假以来，又一起化石拼凑疑案、假
案；如果用宇宙大爆炸整体生命学去考察“直立猿人”
化石年代之谜，必然带来“宇宙大爆炸”的天翻地！……
十四、破绽百出的“滕骨化石”与“露西”不能
证明“人是猴子变的”
1973 年 10 月约翰森（美国俄意俄州克利夫兰自
然博物馆的人类学家）在埃塞俄比亚的阿拉法地区平
燥沟壑中的一个叫哈达的地点，发现了一个膝关节的
股骨下端和胫骨上端的两化石骨头，从其型状和形成
关节的方式推知是人科的骨骼，是人类祖先的膝部骨
骼，既然是人的骨骼，它和猿没有任何关系，骨骼的
直立行走性是必然的，也无需证明的；从它出土的地
质年代 350 万年的时间表看，它根本不可能是人又是
猿的膝骨，同样不能证明海克尔“猿人”的真实存在。
1974 年约翰森和法国地质学家泰伊伯在发现膝
骨化石地儿的附近，得到一重要发现，出土一真人的
骨架，女性，约 20 岁，死因不明，命名“露西” ，因
没有头骨，头部性状不明，身肩只有 107—122 厘米，
约翰森认为“露西”是直立行走又是树栖的（树栖是
强拉硬扯编造的，不存在任何科学依据），就这样把
403她定在现在黑猩猩与现代人之间，对此人类学家争论
激烈，柯本斯·塔迪，巴黎大学的塞努不同意约翰森
等人的观点。1983 年 4 月 22 日—23 日，加利福尼亚
“人类研究所举行了一次“人类行动的演化”研讨会
以约翰森怀特为一方和以斯特思、萨斯曼等为一方展
开剧烈辩论。当年在美国、英国媒体异常关注，进行
了广泛的报导，结果利基在 1983 年 3 月号的《美国体
质人类学杂志》期特思、萨斯曼否认了“露西”的处
于黑猩猩与现代人之间的猿人位置。在详细分析了“露
西”手骨直到足骨的形态，做出科学的结论——露西
是南方古猿阿法种，虽然双方意见不能统一，但从约
翰森杯特等的解释，距今 300 多万年前的南方古猿更
像猿，它与早期人类 600 多万年前的演化时间表相距
甚远，且漏洞百出，1976 年约翰森给哈达的报告又改
口说： “第一个家庭”的成员属于人属，而“露西”
不属于人属；化石发现人约翰森都是前后矛盾！鉴此，
“露西”不能作为海克尔猿人存在的真实化石证据—
—且人类古生物学化石历史从来就没有人与猿中间的
化石发现，只能拼凑造假！
十五、皮尔唐后化石造假丑闻在全球考古学扩大
化
20 世纪 80 年代，现代中国在元谋盆地小河地区
404豹子洞篝蝴蝶梁子发现的一具幼年头骨，鉴定为拉玛
猿型，认为是人类的祖先，后来宣称在地层中也找到
了“石器” ，将之更名为“蝴蝶人” ，其生存年代定
为距今 400 多万年前，并进而构筑了“开远拉玛猿”
——“禄丰拉玛猿”——“蝴蝶拉玛猿”（或“蝴蝶
人”）——“东方人”——元谋猿人——昭通人（智
人的早期代表）——西畴人、丽江人（智人的晚期代
表）等相当完整的系列。鉴于此，有人提出滇中高原
及其邻区是人类起源的关键地区——这些所谓“相当
完整的系列”早在 70 年代后期考古学界已查到皮尔唐
化石造假痕迹：所谓“蝴蝶人”的“石器”原来是天
然石块；而“东方人”的石器，后来被证明是地表上
拣来的，而且时代甚晚！……鉴此，拉玛猿系是人类
远祖是皮尔唐后化石造假丑闻在东方的扩大化，令人
悲催……
十六、1975 年古墓地阿法化石古猿梦碎
1975 年考古界有一个重大发现，发现了一个“古
墓地” ，估计是某种灾害事件夺去了 15 个人的生命，
其中有 4 个儿童，其余是成人，考古界称为“第一个
家庭” ，但无法证明 13 个人之间的血统，约翰森分析
了化石的特征把它归于阿法种，但至今没有一致的意
见，有三种不同意见：A 南方古猿阿法种；B 南方古猿
405非洲种；C 人属。意见不能统一又怎能成为科学事实
来证明猿人的存在呢？这反映出了 100 多年人类学家
在按图骥“猿人”对号（四阶段）入座，经历的自相
矛盾的共同现象与劣迹。
事实上“阿法墓地”化石，只有 A、B、C 三种可
能！一个化石群只能是可选其一，选择三种可能之一
是一种猜谜，根本不能确定“墓地化石”真实的本性，
就无法用来证明海克尔的“猿人”存在的事实，更不
能成为确凿的“猿”化石证据。
人类学家 100 多年来就是这样激烈的争论着、争
论着……连发现者自己也仅是反复无常，前后矛盾、
顾虑重重！
贝尔因就在于化石的破碎不完整，更大的难点是
他们不知道自己按四阶段寻找的“猿人”是世界上根
本就不存在，也从来没有存在过的化石，只是达尔文
和赫胥黎梦想在海克尔、杜布哇用化石拼凑杜撰出来
的亘古就不存在的把戏啊！
十七、达尔文进化论“从猿到人”欺世盗名罪源
录
达尔文在《人类的由来》一书中指出： “人类早
期祖先可能长着巨大的犬齿。但当他们逐渐习惯使用
石块、棍棒和其他武器对付敌人或对手时，就很少会
406使用上下颌和牙齿了，因此上下颌和牙齿这些器官就
会变小。”
达尔文在《人类的由来》强调说： “如果解放人
类的手和臂并让双脚站得更稳对人类有利，那么毫无
疑问，越来越多的人类祖先选择两足直立行走对他们
更有利。如果手和臂只是习惯性地用于支撑整个身体
或用于爬树，那么它们就不能完善自身，无法制造武
器或有目的地投掷石块和长矛。”——这就是利基第
三阶段大脑明显变大同出一辙！
达尔文认为，这些性质并不是人类独享的技能，
那些与我们有关的其他物种也拥有，它们跟人类不同
的地方仅仅在于高明程度的差异，而不是说它们压根
没有。
身体直立让我们可以扫视大草原，更容易寻找食
物，以及让我们空出手来投掷投射物，在这方面，黑
猩猩跟人一模一样。另外，由于人类力气较小、缺乏
尖牙利爪、没有铠甲一样的皮肤，这会使自己落入不
利的生存困境。为了活下去，我们才拥有了一个聪明
的大脑，让我们可以发展出一系列生存和发展必须仰
赖的技巧，去开拓宇宙大爆炸整体生命学伟大新纪元！
十八、达尔文《物种起源》存在太多太多的“推
测”+ 太多的可能和可能性之模棱两可的论述目的在
407偷换人猿概念
事实上，论述利基第四阶段达尔文进化论根本没
有明确论述；利基第四阶段其必然是：语言、思想精
神、想象力、技能发展到现代人，可见从海克尔 1860
年“猿人”和赫胥黎“人是猴子变的”理论，以及 12
年后达尔文提出“人类起源于非洲黑猩猩” ，他们经
过一个半世纪猜想；如果提升到基因阶段，必须形成
一个完整的人类起源的理论推测——事实上，从《物
种起源》和《人类的由来及性选择》中，我们看到太
多太多的“推测”和达尔文用了太多的可能和可能性
模棱两可的论述（这是理论著述最忌讳）。期目的就
是为了助力海克尔去完成“从猿到人”的“系谱树” ，
创造出莫须有的“猿人”和“从猿到人” 、再从“猿
人种”延续到“现代人”——把猴子变成 18 世纪以来
最无耻人类的祖宗，这就是达尔文“进化论”亵渎人
类最大罪恶！
事实上，进化论历史经过了 173 年生物科学、量
子力学高速发展，特别是孟德尔开创的基因理论和薛
定谔量子力学基因技术的广泛应用，站在新世纪的历
史高度去评价颠覆“猴子理论”早已为新科学理论所
怀疑和抛弃的靶子。
现代解剖学研究证明，人脚部生来就是直立行走
408地结构，人体 206 块骨骼不能因为演化多一块，也不
能因演化少出一块；人脚的骨骼比例完全是按着黄金
分割律生就的；完全是一个最不合理的无理数的合理
结构，从达·芬奇著名人体图就可证明人体无处不在
的“黄金分割比”。也就是说人脚从来没有攀登功能，
正如亚圣士多保所言： “牛长了角就不会生上长牙，
我们不能说牛角是由长牙演化来的。”所以，根本不
存在利基第二阶段的直立行走的适应附设。
利基第三阶段更不符合现代科学研究成果，科学
家研究表明，人的大脑在 1603 年—1607 年直到今天
没有明鲜的变化，也就是说在 163 万年以前人脑已达
到了演化极限——这和前面所提到的人类在 500 万年
前已经存在完整的 6 个图文结构是相一致的；再从基
因论去认识，这种史前人类的高度智能性的例证更多。
也就是说，人类 25000 个基因的稳定时间超过了 30
亿年基本没有改变。人类大肠杆菌的存在可以追溯到
30 亿年前，一直没有改变。
基因科学家苏万册、奥尔德里奇对此强调说： “事
实上，基因的传递并没有什么特别，它已经存在几十
亿年了。它的应用能力来自人类对它的控制，而不是
进化的盲目性”。
事实上，基因平行转缓与经典的达尔文进化论相
409冲突。生命演化不是线性的，而是非线性的。达尔文
的时间久远缓慢演化受到科学理论和古生物人学学新
发现 3 冲突。即：生命特别是人类物种窗框大爆发突
生的；这有寒武纪生命大爆发化石群证明！
2022 年，人类在“7.11”得到韦伯太空望远镜 173
亿年珍贵信息的今天，必须重新审视地球、太阳系诞
生时间窗，彻底控弃地球生命 50 亿年的时限，像哈维
对盖论错误心血运动理论的割舍，才有了《心血运动
论》揭示心血液循环“小宇宙体系”和“大宇宙体系”
和宇宙大爆炸整体生命学对应的心心相印；鉴此，我
们人类必须为其彻底颠覆达尔文进化论；更不能用“利
基四阶段” 、杜布哇拼凑“直立猿人”化石，利用 150
年前“猴子理论”和《物种起源》进化论的推测，去
按图索骥“海克尔猿人”……
让我们把英国主教威尔伯福斯挖苦说赫胥黎“是
猴子后裔的先生……”和达尔文一起，釘在”“人是
猴子变的”的历史耻辱在上，永世不得翻身吧！
跟灵长类远亲没有区别！
十九、达尔文进化论用五个事实诡辩产生三个推
论建立起来一个“从猿到人”世纪大骗局
达尔文的理论的关键是由五个事实，诡辩产生三
个推论，建立起来“从猿到人”世纪大骗局可以休亦!
410达尔文理论的五事实诡辩三个推理时，留下了莫
名其妙的五个缺口令进化论自废武功。
让我们对这五个理论缺口做如下批驳：
五个事实：
事实 1、群体潜在的指数增长（动物生殖超几何
级数）（来源：佩利、马尔萨斯及其他学者）。
事实 2、观察到的群体是存稳定性
（来源：可以参考观察到贝尔格莱德五年考察）。
事实 3、资源有限（来源：观察并为马尔萨斯的
《人口论》强调的人口历史）
事实 4、个体是有独特性（来源：动物驯化家和
和亚里士多德等分类学家）
事实 5、许多个体变异是可遗传的（来源：动物
良种家《物种起源》前三章）。
达尔文运用的事实 1、事实 2、事实 3 得出推论 1
——个体中存在差异与生存斗争，做出推论的学者是
马尔萨斯），于是留下第一个理论跳空缺口——群体
是有稳定性即物种不变与推理自相矛盾，形成了进化
理论与事实的不相溶。
达尔文又用：事实 1、事实 2、事实 3、事实 4、
事实 5 叠加推论，得出第二个推理——推论 2：生存
差异，即自然选择（理论出自华莱士推论来自“自然
411淘汰”是华莱士发现的，隐瞒了学者华莱士的历史功
绩）。由于，事实 5 的论多个体变异是可遗传的变异
本质上是种内变异，所有生物体的遗传都是物种个体
的性状遗传。于是留下了第二个理论跳空缺口，而且
这个缺口是建立在第一个缺口（物种不变）上的；这
就产生了自然选择理论的混乱，完全否定了从猿到人
世纪大骗局！事实上，达尔文进化理论跳空的根据就
是把同种内生物学现象扩大升华到种间的生物学领域
产生的概念错位和倒置。
最后达尔文用事实 1、2、3、4、5 加推论 1、2
做出推论三——经过许多代进化（做出推论的学者达
尔文）完成了对进化论的升华，留下了第三个理论跳
空缺口——把赖尔的地质渐变的均变地质学移植嫁接
到物种起源的生物学范畴，这种无机界到有机界均变
理论的大跳空（达尔文所提出的进化论是完全依循赖
尔这种“均变”逻辑，但是赖尔本人却不能接受生物
“均变”进化的思想理论。当时也有不少熟悉化石证
据的人同样不能接受进化论），就连达尔本人都模棱
两可。于是造成了推论 3 和推论 1 不可调和的矛盾—
—不变的物种事实，产生跨种的变异“均变”进化，
这里达尔文认为，能够产生推理 3 的进化事实证据是
来源于事实 5，完全是动物家养人工选择的事实，没
412有一例自然体系的例证，更没有化石铁证（寒武纪生
命大爆发是“突变”）！事实上，人工（家养）选择
的所有超越种，又都是同种个体的变异，充其量只能
是人工选择变异，根本不能成为进化理论证例，更不
能成为一种历史进化趋势形成理论，完全没有历史化
石成为论证依据，达到确切的科学证明（问题存在的
原因，在于达尔文时代并没有遗传学，特别是分子遗
传学）。
进化论开启者达尔文心知肚明，理论最根本的缺
陷在于： “在化石记录问题中，使达尔文主义者最痛
苦的是寒武纪大爆炸（Cambriam explosion）。大约
6 亿年之前几乎所有动物的门（Phyum）同时在地层中
出现……
正如道全斯所说： “这些动物化石就好像有人特
意放进去一样，几乎没有进化的历史可以近寻。”
达尔文在世时还没有证据显示塞武纪之前有任何
生物存在。他在《物种起源》中承认“这现象目前仍
未能解释，而且的确是可以用来作为有力的证据打击
我说在要讨论的观点”。
可见达尔文生前也知道自己的理论存在着无法论
证的软胁，由于生命有特殊复杂的生理结构与有机化
学特殊架构！
413事实上，演化理论必需存在演化过程中物种之间
的过渡类型，没有“过渡类型”进化就是谬论。人类
5000 年人类文明历史、特别是古生物学至今没有“过
渡类型”确凿的证据；达尔文等人猜想 20 世纪会找到
明确的证据，也就是当时用“猜想”作了证据——这
是一个低级错误！直到 2022 年考古学发掘出的化石不
计其数，禁得起推敲和鉴定“过渡类型”的证据还没
有一例，永远不会出现！……
二十、达尔文促海克尔“重演律”到利基“四阶段”
假造化石链“从猿到人”百年梦断何谈进化论
约翰逊（PhilipJohnson）《审判达尔文》问世就
总结说：达尔文“从猿到人”百年化石梦断“化石向
我们展示的都是突然出现的某种有机体，没有逐步进
化的任何痕迹……这些有机体一旦出现，基本上就不
再变了，哪怕过了几百万年，不管气候和环境如何变
化。如果达尔文的理论成立，这些条件本应该引起物
种的巨大变化。”
19 世纪初，古生物学之父居维叶（1769 年 8 月
23 日-1832 年 5 月 13 日）完成划时代巨著《变灾论》。
灾变论(catastrophism)确认，地层的记录显示的模式
分明可见古代的环境曾发生多次突然的剧变(大天
灾)，大量不同的生物种都因此灭绝了；接下来是一段
414创造的时期；很多新的生物种就突然出现，而这些新
的物种却没有留下任何痕迹显示它们是怎样演化来
的。化石就是“灾变”的产物。化石不是一般条件下
能形成的，生物在腐烂风化前必须埋在地下很深，在
强大的压力下才能渐渐变成化石。只有“灾变”才能
提供这样的条件，化石也就成了灾难的见证。
地层中化石完全证明：物种的发展在很短时间内
大面积突然出现的，发展繁荣，再到大毁灭，残留的
和新生物种周而复始；例如，在西伯利亚的冻土中，
发现了冰冻的成千上万的哺乳动物的遗骸。有的很完
整，有的被扯碎和树干绞在一起。检测它们胃里的食
物，发现了还没来得及消化的毛茛草，确认那里曾是
温和地带的草原，极短时间内，发生这场毁灭性的灾
难……
哈普古德（Charles H. Hapgood）认为：极短的
时间内，板块发生了几千英里的移动，把西伯利亚带
到了今天的位置是地球板块漂移的结果。
事实上，自林奈以来，生物分类学上属于各种大
类的生物(如不同界、门、纲、目)各有其不同的基本
结构，各大类之间极少有中间型(intermediate types)
就是这种“灾变”“间断平衡”的历史必然！
1972 年，美国古生物学家古尔德和尼尔斯·埃尔
415德里奇提出的“间断平衡”演化理论。“间断平衡”
理论认为，生物的演化并不像达尔文及新达尔文主义
者认为的那样是一个缓慢的渐变积累过程，而是长期
的稳定（甚至不变）与短暂的剧变交替的过程，从而
在地质记录中留下许多空缺。“间断平衡”理论引发
了世人对达尔文主义的全盘否定和怀疑，古尔德始终
认为达尔文主义的核心是自然选择理论，而不是生物
渐变论……
1997 年，古尔德出版《生命的壮阔：古尔德论生
物大历史》立刻轰动全球，古尔德用“常识”告诉全
世界，生物从简单到复杂、从低级到高级的变化并不
是自然界普遍的铁律，把“进化”说成趋势是人类中
心主义演绎出来的莫须有神话；深刻揭露并指出了进
化论的致命缺陷，早已成为现代生命科学理论共识。
在《自达尔文以来—自然史沉思录》经典著
作，古尔德向全人类扪心叩问：
达尔文在确立了进化论之后，为什么迟了 20 年才
发表？
古尔德无情揭露并回答说： “这是因为他清楚进
化论的含义比一般人所意识到的更为离经叛道！”
1860 年，海克尔读了达尔文的《物种起源》后就
对进化论深信不疑，在 1866 年出版的《普通形态学》，
416以进化的观点阐明生物的形态结构，并以“系统树”
的形式，表示出各类动物的演化历程和亲缘关系提出
“重演律” ，把生命起源和人类演变完全纳入进化体
系之中，成为“猴子变人”理论仅次于达尔文的鼻祖！
现代很多学者完全证明了重演律是一个观察错误
和错误理论；德国人类胚胎学家布莱赫施密特著有《人
的生命之始》（TheBeginnings ofHuman Life）全盘否
定了达尔文进化论与海克尔“重演律” ；无情揭露达
尔文自己承认并推断说：
"在现存的生物种及已经绝种的生物种之间必须
有极大数目的过渡环节和中间型。"
布莱赫施密特用铁的事实证明“却恰恰相反。
地质学家所发现的新种或一组的新种都是突然出现，
而不是经过一系列的进化而形成。”
达尔文不得不承认化石的证据是"最明显、反对我
的进化论的理由"。并说： “我不愿意假装不知道物种
突变的记录是何等的贫乏，在保存得最好的地层中也
找不到大量的过渡生物来连接每一地层前后所出现的
生物。这是我的理论最大的困难。”
于是，大英帝国为了“日不落” ，1908 年-1912
年 2 月陶逊和伍德沃德爵士高层精心策划了皮尔唐惊
天动地的化石造假案，且化石造假余孽不断发酵：1892
417年发现的人和猿之间的过渡化石“嘉伯人” ，是一块
猿的头骨和相距 40 英尺的一根人的腿骨拼凑出来的，
“嘉伯人”已被抛入历史垃圾袋；一直到 1984 年
“嘉伯人”又被新发现的猿人化石“露茜”代替，后
来鉴定发现并确定， “露茜”是一种绝种的猿，和人
没有丝毫关系。
曾几何时，轰动世界古生物学最早的 6 具“始祖
鸟化石”被认为是鸟类和爬行动物之间过渡物种的典
范，后来鉴定出 5 具是人造的，剩下的 1 具坚决拒绝
任何鉴定。最初的“发现者”坦白了造假的原因之一：
太信仰进化论了，就伪造出了假的化石，说成是最有
力的化石证据。
进化论最致命的错误是推论的各个学说之间存在
根本对立，和事实分歧之南辕北辙世界绝无仅有；正
如古尔德形象地揭示其
这就是为什么以林奈为代表的所有著名的古生物
学家……和伟大的地质学家……都一致极力绝对主张
物种是绝对不变"！
1880 年，美国加利福尼亚的太波山下出土了许多
精巧的石器工具，鉴定后确认这是 5500 万年前的遗
迹，完全打破了进化论里人类进化的体系。
1966 年，墨西哥的霍亚勒克出土了一批铁矛，
418美国地质学家麦金泰尔博士奉命去鉴定。她用了两种
方法测定了铁矛的年代，得到了同样的结果：距今 25
万年，铁矛是人制造的工具 25 万年完全违背了“从猿
到人”的进化论……
约翰逊力作《审判达尔文》总结说： “化石向我
们展示的都是突然出现的某种有机体，没有逐步进化
的任何痕迹……这些有机体一旦出现，基本上就不再
变了，哪怕过了几百万年，不管气候和环境如何变化。
如果达尔文的理论成立，这些条件本应该引起物种的
巨大变化。”
从《物种起源》以来，进化论者从来没有提出公
式，计算基因突变机制实现进化的机率；事实上，任
何一个合理的公式都会否定进化。科学家已经从概率
上证明了现代进化论的骗局和错误；
贝希（Behe, M.J.）的《达尔文的黑匣子》在多
处从生命结构的复杂精密（化学）性完全否定了进化
的。并提出一个宽松的公式，根据突变机率计算进化
产生新物种的概率：P＝（M· C·L·B·S)N 通俗地
说，就是一个物种的某个个体发生了突变（机率只有
10-3），并且突变后的基因与自身其它基因在不同层
次的产物上可以相容（宽松估计为 10-2），而且在生
存竞争中该个体能够存活，有繁殖的机会（10-1）；
419而且突变恰好有纵向进化的意义（这种情况至今还没
有被发现，权且估计为 10-3）；而且突变基因在种群
中不被丢失、稳定、扩大，一旦丢失就又得重来（宽
松的估计为 10-2）；因为新物种的形成需要一系列新
基因的出现，假设要 10 个（幂指数 N＝10，实际物种
间绝对没有这么小的基因差异），那么进化出一个新
物种的概率为：P＝（10-3 × 10-2 × 10-1 × 10-3
× 10-2 ）10 = 10-110。按照一年繁殖 10 代，种群
个体数为 1000，相应的进化所需要的时间极为宽松的
计算也需要 10106 年。目前科学认为宇宙中所有基本
粒子总数只有 1070 个，宇宙年龄只有 200 亿（2×1010
年），进化一个新物种的时间，是宇宙的年龄的自乘
10 亿次，足见进化是绝不可能的。无数实践证明：品
种的变化和新物种的产生是两回事（品种是人工选择
的结果、物种是自然系统的自然存在）。
考古学家克莱默和汤姆森（Michael A. Cremo &
RichardThompson）的《考古学禁区》(Forbidden
Archeolgy) 一书，列举了 500 个确凿的与进化论相背
的事例，那是几万、几十万、百万、几万甚至几亿年
前的人类文明遗迹。比如： “布林顿（D.G.Brinton）
1890 年的研究指出：黑人是低等的，因为他们保留着
幼年的特征；博克（L. Bolk）1926 年的研究宣称：
420黑人是低等的，因为他们的发育超越了白种人保留的
幼年的特征。”
寒武纪生命大爆发已经完全证明“灾变”与“间
断平衡”的真实历史存在，这短时间地球地貌很少变
化就没有人类的“灾变” ；比如，在 1532 年根据史
料绘制的世界地图，它显示了冰层以下的南极洲，当
把它与现代测到的南极洲冰层以下的面貌叠在一起的
时候，惊人的相似。
在君士坦丁堡（Constantinople）还发现了 1513
年皮瑞· 雷斯（A. PiriReis）综合史料绘制的非洲
和南美洲的海岸地图及南极洲地图，精确到半个经度，
这比在人类能够在海上确定位置早 250 年。显然，这
是上一期人类文明的遗迹。而且，那个文明时期，南
极洲没有冰雪覆盖，又何谈“进化论”！
第二十二章 宇宙大爆炸遗留“史前文明”
凸显达尔文进化论噩梦破碎
一、真实存在的“史前文明”
新西兰遗传学博士但顿在《出现危机的理论：
进化论》一书中将达尔文的进化论成为“二十世纪最
大的谎言” ，在但顿看来，人类这样的高等生命是极
为复杂的，并不是达尔文所说的“自然选择”突变的
结果，并提出一个重磅观点： “史前文明”真实存在，
421而人类就是史前文明的遗孤。
2021 年 10 月 17 日 考古学家克莱默和汤姆森
(Michael A· Cremo &Richard Thompson )的《考古
学禁区》(Forbidden Archeology) 一书,列举了 500
个确凿的事例,那是几万、几十万、百万、几万以至几
十亿年前的人类文明遗迹，完全是达尔文进化论根本
无法解释的对象！……
古生物学家认为，人类文明仅仅演化了 6000
余年。那么，距今 5500 万年-26 万年和 20 亿-26 亿
年人类“史前文明”遗迹的发现与层出不穷，将铁面
无私地把达尔文进化论打入世纪冷宫，永世不得翻
身！……
二、距今 20 亿的大型核反应堆和 28 亿年的史
前遗迹
1968 年，考古学家朱伊特（Y. Druet）和萨尔
法蒂（H. Salfati）在法国的一块石灰岩层里发现了
一些不同型号的金属管，岩层的年龄是 6500 万年
（Corliss, 1978, 652～653）。远可追溯到在南非克
莱克山出土的几百个精巧的金属球，距今 28 亿年。
在加蓬共和国发现 20 亿年前的大型核反应堆，反
应堆的结构也比今天的还要先進，可用的放射性元素
全部被提炼光了……
422三、5500 万年的武器到 26 万年的铁矛
1880 年，美国加利福尼亚的太波山 300 英尺的
地下出土了一批精美的石器工具，经鉴定这是 5500
万年前的遗迹；
1966 年，墨西哥的霍亚勒克出土了一批铁矛，美
国的地质学家麦金泰尔博士发现这是 25 万年的武器。
考古学家胡安·阿曼塔在墨西哥的普瑞拉瓦城，发现
一个动物的颌骨化石里面有一块残破的铁矛的矛头，
鉴定这是 26 万年前的武器……
四、铁锤“合金”含有 96.6 %的铁，0.74 %的硫，
2.6 %的氯远远超越人类现代文明
美国德克萨斯州拉克西河岸的岩层中，在恐龙脚
印化石旁边发现了 12 具人的脚印化石；后来，在同一
地层中又发现了人的手指化石和一把铁锤，锤柄已经
变成了煤，表明这个地区在远古时，曾经深埋在地下。
锤头含有 96.6 %的铁，0.74 %的硫，2.6 %的氯，这
种现在都不可能造出来的合金，展示了史前一个高度
发达的人类文明！
四、 希腊人柏拉图《对话录》的“亚特兰蒂斯”
帝国一万年奇迹
2011 年，一支考古队声称他们已找到了亚特兰蒂
斯的位置：在西班牙南部的泥滩之下，证实“大西国”
423在公元前 1 万年，遭遇一场毁灭一切的大洪水，便沉
入了海底万丈深渊。
公元前 350 年古希腊哲学家柏拉图在《对话录》
中，就讲述这个高度发达的文明、拥有载人航天飞行
工具的亚特兰蒂斯帝国：亚特兰蒂斯拥有最神奇的能
源系统，这种系统的中心是一种透明的六边形柱体，
人们称之为“磁欧石”（今已失传）。这种石头能够
吸收阳光，并且将阳光转变为能源，甚至能让人体再
生、返老还童，令人难以置信……无独有偶，2013 年，
探险队又在葡萄牙西边的海域，发现了海底金字塔，
估计是亚特兰蒂斯的遗迹，令人不能不信！
……
综上所述，迄今大型人类“史前文明”遗迹历历
在眼前，琳琅满目：还有万年埃及的金字塔、曾在地
球上辉煌一时的古玛雅人的金字塔、公元 900 年的玻
利维亚的帝华纳科古城遗址、公元 12 万年左右秘鲁萨
克塞华曼城堡等等……都让达尔文进化论在人类“史
前文明”（20 亿年前的大型核反应堆前）前瑟瑟发抖
而无地自容吧！
第二十三章 现代人发现宇宙大爆炸爆烈
“原力”在星系宇宙地球万物“原子”核内
蕴藏惊天秘密
424一、3000 年古希腊人类就预言万物原子存在
希腊人的万物本原原力是什么
这是 3000 年古希腊就思考的问题。
德谟克利特（希腊文：Δημόκριτος, 约
公元前 460 年～公元前 370 年）就回答说“世界万物
是由原子构成的。”精辟论断延续 3000 年，一直到
2022 年 7 月 11 日得到韦伯天文望远镜拍照得到证明
和新发现！
原子,atom,希腊文的原义是“不可分” ；就这样，
原子不可分就成为定式；一直延续到 18 世纪英国化学
家、物理学家约翰·道尔顿（John Dalton，1766 年 9
月 6 日—1844 年 7 月 27 日），原子理论的提出者。
他所提供的关键的学说，使化学领域自那时以来有了
巨大的进展。道尔顿患有色盲症，这种病的症状引起
了他的好奇心。他开始研究这个课题，最终发表了第
一篇有关色盲的论文。后人为了纪念他，又把色盲症
叫作道尔顿症。 1844 年 7 月 27 日，道尔顿逝世。
道尔顿的现代原子论里继承了“原子是不可再分
的”。
那么，原子真的就是构成物质的最小单元不可分
的吗？原子里面还能不能继续拆分的吗！？
二、现代人科学家玻尔原子模型
425玻尔原子模型。从玻尔假设说起，玻尔假设如下：
①、在所有力学上可能的电子绕核运动之中，只
有电子的动量矩 P 等于量 n/2π的整数倍的那些轨道
运动才是稳定的，即：
P=n h/2π
②、电子在上述假设所许可的任一轨道上运动时，
原子具有一定的能量 Wn，而不会发出光来，这称为稳
定运动状态。
③、只有原子从一个具有较大能量 Wn 的稳定运动
状态过渡到另一个较低能量 Wk 的稳定运动状态时，原
子发射出单色光，它的频率是：
vkn = Wn/h –Wk/h 。
1913 年英国剑桥大学的学生 N·Bohr 提出了一个
假设，成功地解释了 H 原子光谱,原子假设如上；这里，
包含：
A\定态假设
▲原子只能处于一系列不连续的能量状态中，在
这些状态中原子是稳定的。电子虽然绕核旋转，但并
不向外辐射能量，这些状态叫定态 [1] 。
B\能量假设
▲原子从一种定态跃迁到另一种定态时，它辐射
或吸收一定频率的光子，光子的能量由这两个定态的
426能量差决定。hv=Em-En（h 为普朗克常数）。
C\轨道假设
▲原子的不同能量状态对应于电子的不同运行轨
道。由于原子的能量状态是不连续的，因此电子运动
的轨道也可能是不连续的，即电子不能在任意半径的
轨道上运动。
三、现代人玻尔与三代师生前仆后继打开了原子
内核秘密
玻尔理论成功解释了氢原子光谱不连续的特点和
能量状态不连续，留下能量内在问题如何解密！？
玻尔“原子模型”提供了解决这一问题的关键，
后由玻尔的三代师生约瑟夫·汤姆森、欧内斯特·卢
瑟福、詹姆斯·查德威克前仆后继来完成的。
“假使我能把物体对于电磁和电流有关的状态重
新作一番更特殊的考察，我肯定会超出我现在所知道
的范围，不过那当然是以后的事了。”
——威廉·汤姆森（英文：William Thomson）
四、现代科学家约瑟夫·汤姆森发现葡萄干布丁
模型——揭开原子第一层面纱
威廉·汤姆森（英文：William Thomson），第一
代开尔文男爵（英文：1st Baron Kelvin），又称开
尔文勋爵（Lord Kelvin）。生于 1824 年 6 月 26 日的
427爱尔兰贝尔法斯特，卒于 1907 年 12 月 17 日的苏格兰
拉格斯。为英国的数学物理学家、工程师。也是热力
学温标（绝对温标）的发明人，被称为热力学之父。
汤姆森在研究β射线的时候，发现β射线是由一
种带负电粒子构成的，这种粒子被称作电子。
汤姆森认为，在每个原子里面应该都有这样的电
子。而且，汤姆森还提出了他的葡萄干布丁原子模型：
每个原子就像是一个葡萄干布丁，正电荷和布丁一样，
均匀分布在整个原子里，带负电荷的电子，和葡萄干
一样，撒在布丁上。
“布丁模型”是当年最重要的科学历史前沿，被
忽视了；理论核心是： “原子是可以继续拆分的” ，
颠覆了自古希腊德谟克利特到道尔顿的现代原子论里
继承了“原子是不可再分的”错误！从理论上首创拆
分原子，为他的学生卢瑟福继续拆分原子扫清了障碍！
五、现代科学家卢瑟福炼金术模型深入原子核
1901 年，卢瑟福在研究放射性元素“钍”的时候，
发现钍元素能够向外释放出α射线，更让他惊讶的是，
在衰变之后，钍元素变成了另一种元素。
一种元素能够转变成另一种元素，过去这件事只
存在于炼金术士的幻想中，现在卢瑟福竟然证实了，
这一重大的发现，让卢瑟福获得了 1908 年的诺贝尔化
428学奖——最诡秘的问题昭然若揭：卢瑟福认为自己是
物理学家获得诺贝尔化学奖很难理解；这里最重要是
大自然并没有给物理学和化学截然分开，自然现象是
相关联的；卢瑟福对放射性元素“衰变”的研究，认
定了一个伟大事实：放射性元素释放出来的能量，来
自于原子内部——137 亿年宇宙大爆炸爆烈“原力”
在星系宇宙地球“原子”内的诡秘分布与留存！……；
六、现代科学家卢瑟福从原子内部能量射线与“衰变”
发现原子可继续往下拆①
1908 年，卢瑟福在助手盖革的帮助下，一起用α
粒子继续轰击金箔。他们发现，α粒子在透过金箔的
时候，大部分粒子都是直直地穿过，而很少一部分粒
子发生了偏移，卢瑟福称之为散射，而还有极少数粒
子，发生了非常大的偏移。
异常现象背后一定有原因，卢瑟福就把研究重点
放在这些偏转很大的粒子身上，他甚至让助手去找，
有没有被反弹回来的α粒子。虽然卢瑟福本人没抱什
么希望，可助手竟然真的发现了，有非常非常少的粒
子，被直直地反弹回来了。
用卢瑟福自己的话来说，这就像你拿一门炮去轰
一片纸巾，结果炮弹竟然被纸巾弹回来了。这些被弹
回的粒子，就犹如一发炮弹，击中了卢瑟福的想象力。
429当时，卢瑟福已经知道了，α粒子是带有正电荷
的，如果发生了这么大幅度的偏转，一种可能是，它
们受到了非常大大的电磁力作用。被弹回的粒子，应
该是直直撞上了这个电荷集中的地方，这个地方就是
原子核……
卢瑟福反复研究 4 年，确认了大量的数据，认为
万无一失之后，在 1911 年，公布了“卢瑟福模型” ；
卢瑟福认为：原子不是坚不可摧的，原子中间是
一个极小的带正电的原子核，外面是绕着它高速旋转
的电子。
七、现代科学家卢瑟福从原子内部能量射线与“衰
变”发现原子可继续往下拆②
1920 年，卢瑟福公布了他的发现：氢原子核是构
成所有原子核的基本单元。他给这个基本单元起了一
个名字，质子。在公布这个发现之后，他到找另一位
物理学家帕特里克·布莱克特利一起做更多的研究，
验证自己的猜想。
观察了 23000 张照片上的 40 多万条轨迹之后，他
们在其中找到了 8 条特殊的轨迹。再一次，从异常情
况中，卢瑟福做出了重大发现，这 8 条轨迹能够说明，
氢原子核确实是构成其他元素原子核的成分（这 8 条
轨迹表示，氮原子核α粒子碰撞后形成了极其不稳定
430的氟原子，之后，衰变成了一个氧原子核一个氢原子
核）。
八、现代科学家小居里夫妇错过发现中子却无缘
诺贝尔奖
卢瑟福发现质子之后，跟他的助手查德威克又发
现了一个神奇的现象。
氮原子的原子核重量是大致是氢原子核的 14 倍
（大约跟 14 个质子重量相当），而电子只有 7 个，如
果原子核里只有质子，那氮原子应该带电才对，这不
太可能。于是，卢瑟福推测，原子核内应该还有一种
不带电的中性粒子，重量跟质子差不多。
这个中性粒子，就是中子。但到目前为止，这只
是一个推测，卢瑟福并没有直接证据证明中子存在。
最先发现这个证据的，是德国两位科学家 Walther
Bothe 和 Herbert Becker。
1930 年，他们用α粒子轰击锂、铍、硼等元素，
轰击完之后，发现了一种奇怪的射线。这种射线能量
很高，而且不带电，他们认为，这应该是γ射线（一
种电磁波辐射）。
据说，最早发现中子证据的是居里夫人的女儿和
女婿、小居里夫妇。小居里夫妇在其母亲发现放射性
之后；立刻对这种射线进行研究并利用这种辐射轰击
431其他物质，得到了非常高能的质子甚至怀疑这种射线
本身可是γ射线？就这样与中子擦肩而过，而无缘诺
贝尔奖！
九、现代人发现中子曾有一段导师（支点）佳话
科学发现是一个导师传承的过程；古希腊城邦科学创
新技术“师傅带徒弟”才诞生了意大利文艺复兴三杰：
达.芬奇、米开朗基罗、拉斐尔！
科学源于艺术。
同理，发现中子曾有一段导师（支点）佳话：
【第二个实例是查德威克发现中子。这是最典型
的导师支点产生原创创新成果并得到诺贝尔奖的案
例。玻尔在提出原子结构模型时，玻尔发现所有元素
的原子量和质子数都不相等。所以玻尔预感到原子核
中除质子外，还应该存在一种不带电的中性粒子。玻
尔在和卢瑟福交谈中把这个假想告诉了卢瑟福。当时
卢瑟福主持卡文迪许实验室，用 a 粒子从轻元素的原
子核想把中子轰出来，但始终没有成功，没有找到中
子。到 1930 年德国物理学家波西报告说：他用 a 粒子
轰击铍靶时发现以前从没有的强辐射，能穿透几厘米
厚的铅板。当时只有 r 粒子能穿透厚的铅板，所以波
西认为这就是 r 粒子，竟轻易地放过了发现中子的支
点。一年以后，法国著名物理学家约里奥·居里夫妇
432重新做了波西的实验，和波西的结果相同，并又发现
碳和氢两种轻原子构成的石蜡碰到这种射线时，石蜡
的质子被打了出来。居里夫妇只认为这是 r 射线的新
的作用，再一次轻易放过了发现中子的支点。由于查
德威克记得导师玻尔、卢瑟福对中子的预言，立刻想
到这就是他们寻找了好久的中子。因为：1、r 射线以
光速运动，而末知射线--中子速度只有光速的 1/10。
2、因为 r 射线没有质量，所以就没有动量，不可能把
质子撞出。随后查德威克通过实验证明了中子的存在，
于 1935 年获得诺贝尔大奖。可见导师支点有着最直接
的撬动地球的力量。所以我们要留心导师的每一句话，
随时作笔记，虽然当时不能心领神会，但有时候会成
为随手可得的支点灵性，从而使自己的生命走向辉
煌。】——引自《2003 年 4 月 15 日强燕平在清华大
学科研思维方法课上的演讲》
十、现代科学家小居里夫妇发现大爆炸“链式反
应”
小居里夫妇是 F·约里奥·居里（Frederic Joliot
－curie,1900～1958）和他的夫人 I·约里奥·居里
（Irene Joliot－Curie，1897～1956）。约里奥—居
里夫妇证明了裂变产生的中子能够引起链式反应。
小居里夫妇发现核裂变和链式反应的我的科学
433家，从科学实验得到实际利用原子能的依据，为人类
开发新的能源开辟了广阔的前景因为稳定的人工放射
性的发现，他们获得了 1935 年诺贝尔化学奖。
1937 年，他离开了放射性学会，开始担任法兰西
学院教授，并参与链式反应和核反应条件的研究，成
功通过利用铀和重水实现可控核裂变的核反应产生能
量。约里奥是爱因斯坦在与罗斯福总统的信件中提及
的科学家之一，爱因斯坦称他为“链式反应的主导科
学家之一”——爱因斯坦
十一、现代科学家劳伦斯“回旋加速器”逐鹿 1939
年诺奖
科学历史总是有太多的巧合，劳伦斯同样发现了
Walther Bothe 和小居里夫妇遗憾与 1935 年诺贝尔奖
擦肩而过，却被查德威克夺得头筹。
然而，科学发现是无止境的！……
1929 年劳伦斯设计并领导建造第一台环形加速
器： “回旋加速器” ，领导建造伯克利辐射实验室。
1932 年建造 28 厘米的加速器，可把质子加速到
1.22 兆电子伏、并发现了一系列超铀元素，如锝、铹
（为纪念劳伦斯而命名）；鉴此，伯克利辐射实验室
成了世界上第一个加速器中心，并且培养了一大批加
速器的专门人才，推动了粒子物理学的重大进展。
4341941 年他还成功地用加速器制备了 96 兆电子伏
的碳离子束，并将回旋加速器中产生的放射性磷和其
他同位素用于医疗，首次用放射性碘治疗甲状腺疾病，
用中子束治疗癌症。
第二次世界大战期间，他参与制订“曼哈顿计划” ，
主管用电磁法分离制造原子弹所需的铀–235 的工
作，劳伦斯由于在创建加速器方面的贡献获 1939 年诺
贝尔物理学奖。
十二、现代科学家费米首创世界第一座可控原子核裂
变链式反应堆揭开宇宙大爆炸“原力”内潜存在万物
大爆炸原力
费米，E 是美籍意大利物理学家，1926 年初，费
米根据泡利不相容原理，提出电子应服从的统计规律。
这个统计规律也适用于服从不相容原理的其他粒子，
如质子、中子，这对于理解物质的结构及其性质有空
前突破，1929 年被选为意大利皇家学会会员，1950
年被选为英国皇家学会国外会员。为纪念他所作的贡
献，原子序数为 100 的元素，以他的姓氏命名为镄。
1930 年泡利提出中微子假说（1933 年正式发
表）费米接受中微子假说，结合 W.K.海森伯 1932 年
提出的β衰变就是原子核内一个中子放出一个电子变
为一个质子的过程这个设想，1933 年提出了β衰变理
435论，成功地解释了β衰变现象诸多特点裂变属性。1934
年，费米突发奇想用查德威克刚刚发现的中子轰击铀
原子核，轰击完之后费米发现了放射性很强的东西；
以为得到了比铀更重的 93、94 号元素……竟是铀元素
被轰成了更小的元素，1938 年获得诺贝尔物理学奖。
1939 年 N.玻尔去美国时告诉费米铀裂变的消息
后，费米立刻着手探索核裂变链式反应并在费米领导
下和助手们于 1942 年 12 月 2 日，在芝加哥大学建成
世界上第一座可控原子核裂变链式反应堆——20 世
纪 30 年代，英国、意大利、德国的科学家深入研究发
现：一克重的铀裂变后产生的能量，竟然和三吨煤燃
烧释放的能量相当。就这样，经过从古希腊德谟克利
特到物理学家费米揭开了宇宙大爆炸潜藏在“原子”
内部的（铀裂变）天量暴烈能量暴露在光天化日之下！
——也就诞生了美国“曼哈顿计划”和 1945 年 8 月 6
日美国在广岛投下一颗名为"小男孩"的原子弹！……
十三、1939 年 8 月 2 日爱因斯坦给罗斯福信-宇宙
大爆炸（地狱）之火是这样打开的……
To F.D.罗斯福
436通过和 E.弗尔米，I.西拉德进行关于研究草稿的交流，
最近的工作使我相信在不久的将来，铀元素（核燃料）将成
为一种新型的重要的能源。由此引起的许多问题需要我们提
信高警觉性，假如有必要的话，政府部门应当采取迅速的行
动。因此我相信我有责任提醒您关注以下的事实和建议。
在过去的四个月里，通过约里奥在法国的工作，以及弗
尔米和西拉德在美国进行的工作，使用大量的铀来建立核链
式反应堆，从而产生巨大的能量和大量的新型类镭元素已成
为可能。现在基本可以确定这将在不久的将来实现。
这种新的现象将引导着炸弹的构造，并且这是有可能的
--尽管还不是那么确定--威力十分巨大的炸弹将因此而可
能被制造出来。这样一颗单个的炸弹，用船运载，并在港口
爆炸，将可能会摧毁整个港口以及周围的环境。然而，这样
的炸弹对于空中运输可能显得太过于沉重。
美国只有很少量适合使用的铀矿石。有一些好的矿石在
加拿大和捷克斯洛伐克，但最好的铀资源还是在刚果。
基于这样的情况你也许会认为在美国建造链式反应堆
的物理学家和行政部门保持永久的关系是有必要的。对于你
而言实现这样的可能的方式就是，将这一任务委托给一个你
437信任的人，而他将以一个非官方的身份进行工作。他的任务
也许包括以下内容：
1. 接近政府部门，熟悉未来的发展情况，并且给政府的工
作提出建议，特别是关注为美国获取铀矿的供应。
2. 通过提供资金加速实验活动，解决目前由预算有限的大
学实验室来进行的问题。假如已经有资金，则通过和愿意为
这一事业奉献的个人联系，或者是和具有必要设备的公司实
验室进行合作。
我了解到德国实际上已经停止了捷克斯洛伐克矿山的
铀交易，并对其进行了接管。它已经采取这样早的行动是可
以理解的，根据德国副国务卿的儿子魏茨泽克，供职于柏林
凯撒--威廉研究会，而在那里美国关于铀的活动一直在重复
着。
你真诚的，阿尔伯特.爱因斯坦
From 阿尔伯特.爱因斯坦老格鲁夫大街科尼克，长岛
1939 年 8 月 2 日
十四、爱因斯坦后悔打开“普罗米修斯之火”
为了对抗德国，20 世纪初爱因斯坦来到，美国周围集聚
了全世界顶级核科学家，给美国总统罗斯福一封信，图：
4381939 年 10 月，铀顾问委员会成立了，12 月研制计划就
批准了，很快美国国会就拨了 20 亿美元研究经费。
1945 年 7 月 16 日，美国完成了世界上第 1 次核爆炸，
然后便在 1945 年 8 月 6 日，在日本广岛投下一颗名为"小男
孩"的原子弹，当天广岛就死去了 5 万人。据 2007 年的数据
统计显示，后来一共死了 25 万人。
为此，爱因斯坦后悔不已！
"我现在非常的后悔，当初就不应该给罗斯福总统写那
封信。当时我只是想把原子弹这个罪恶的杀人工具从希特勒
的手中抢过来，没想到却把它送到了另外一个疯子手里。"
——爱因斯坦
十五、现代女神迈特纳和哈恩打开了“地狱之火”边门窥到
439宇宙大爆炸“原力”惊世骇俗爆裂可怕面目
莉泽·迈特纳本名爱丽斯·迈特纳（Elise Meitner），
1878 年出生于奥地利首都维也纳第二区的利奥波德城，1906
年成为维也纳的第二位女博士，博士论文的题目是《不均匀
物质中的热导》，1909 年与哈恩一起发现了放射性衰变时原
子核受到的反弹，1917 年迈特纳重新与哈恩合作，一起发现
了镤的同位素镤 231；镤是 1913 年被卡西米·法扬斯和 O.H.
格林发现的，镤 231 是它最长寿的同位素，1918 年迈特纳终
于获得了她自己的研究组和相应的薪水。1922 年她获得了教
授的职位。
十六、莉泽·迈特纳乃全世界最出类拔萃第一个理论解释了
奥托·哈恩 1938 年发现的核裂变的女科学家；为人类打开
了“地狱之火”边门
1939 年迈特纳和她的外甥奥托·弗里施一起发表了一份
题为《中子导致的铀的裂体：一种新的核反应》论文，在这
篇论文中他们提出了哈恩的“破裂”的理论解释，第一次为
核裂变提出了理论基础。窥视到宇宙大爆炸“原力”在原子
内部“破裂”露出爆烈本来面目！
……
第二次世界大战迈特纳因为犹太人血亲，生命受到威胁
只得经荷兰、丹麦逃往瑞典。在外逃的 1938 年哈恩写信给
迈特纳说，发现了一个“破裂”的现象。哈恩写道： “是否
440有可能铀 239 破裂成了钡和锝？我很想知道你的意见。也许
你可以算一算后发表什么……”
这个“裂变”现象是用中子轰击铀原子的时候，铀核裂
变成了几个碎片（其中一个产物是钡），哈恩觉得这太反常
识了，哈恩等科学家也不知道该怎么解释这个现象，只能求
助于“物理更好”的迈特纳女科学家。
迈特纳看到这个结果，第一反应也觉得，这不可能。
接下来研究迈特纳却认为：哈恩是个优秀的化学家发现铀元
素变成了钡，应该不是什么低级错误。当年核物理领域存在
太多“不可能”的事情最终都被证实了；莉泽·迈特纳认识
到这件事也可能意味着什么重大发现！
科学历史见证，迈特纳的直觉是对的。
迈特纳和弗里施是在他们在树林里散步的时候想到裂
变的主意的。裂变后的原子核的总质量比裂变前的铀核的质
量小，这个小小的质量差转换成了能量。迈特纳使用爱因斯
坦的相对论中 E=mc²的方程计算出每个裂变原子核释放 2 亿
电子伏特的能量。由此迈特纳奠定了原子弹和原子能的基
础。据说迈特纳将他们的结果告诉尼尔斯·玻尔后，玻尔说：
“啊，我们真蠢啊。”
十七、现代科学家迈特纳先知先觉的人造太阳核聚变
现代英国卡拉姆聚变中心所长 Steve Charles Cowley
在 2015 年 7 月 21 日英国上议院科学技术委员会上说道：国
441际热核实验反应堆的成员说 2020 年，但我认为 2025 年反应
堆才会产生首批等离子体。他认为燃烧等离子体在 2030 年
早期都不太可能实现……同样在法国卡达拉舍进行的国际
热核反应堆实验（ITER）已经耗资两百亿美元；
核聚变是指较轻的原子核（例如氘和氚）结合形成较重
的原子核（例如氦）的过程。
原子核内残留和蕴含着巨大的（宇宙大爆炸）能量，原
子核的变化，是从一种原子核变化为另一种原子核，自然释
放出爆烈能量。
科学家研究认识到原子核变化的两种形式分别为：
一、核聚变；二、核裂变。
曼哈顿计划是应用核裂变是原子弹的爆炸原理，费米
的世界第一座反应堆就是利用核裂变原理，目前用来发电的
核电站、制造原子弹。
核聚变是氢弹的爆炸原理，因为爆炸太爆烈氢弹瞬间
爆炸产生的（宇宙大爆炸原始）能量是目前人类无法控制的！
鉴此，热核反应堆实验（ITER）目的必须得到受控的
核聚变，实现科学家们伟大梦想“人造太阳核聚变” ，就成
为 21 世纪伟大科学前沿与新纪元。
迈特纳先知先觉的人造太阳核聚变；地球上的海水中
含有大量的氘，产生氚的锂也有丰富的储量，是理想的较轻
的原子核（例如氘和氚）。
442科学家发现，一升海水中的氘经过聚变反应释放出的能
量相当于 300 升汽油燃烧的能量！
与目前核反应堆的核裂变相比，核聚变反应产物优势明
显，氦很稳定，对环境没有污染。鉴此，核聚变是未来最理
想的最清洁能源。
然而，可控核聚变太难！据劳逊判据：参与反应时等离
子气体的密度和对它可靠约束时间。首先，要求有极高的温
度和压力。从宇宙大爆炸考量太阳的中心温度高达 1500 万
摄氏度，并且还有巨大的压力才能使核聚变正常反应。
在地球上不可能获得如此大的压力，只能通过把温度提
高到上亿度来弥补；还需要相当低的密度。高温下的等离子
体具有相当大的压强，因此要把容器内的气体抽到绝对真
空，相当于常温下气体密度的几万分之一；又因为高温下的
等离子体非常不稳定，就必须对等离子体进行充分约束，保
持一定的时间，使其充分聚变！……
在核聚变过程，高温、密度、压强、真空、时间和对等
离子体进行充分约束（这就是宇宙大爆炸需要的条件）；每
一个环节都不能出问题。否则必然功亏一篑！甚至产生全球
性超过核爆炸亿万倍的巨大灾难！——人造太阳爆炸了是毁
灭世界的啊！
十八、重大突破美国完成核聚变正能量揭示宇宙大爆炸恒星
太阳系能量由来
4432022 年 12 月 13 日，美国能源部官员宣布，由美国政府
资助的加州劳伦斯利弗莫尔国家实验室，首次成功在核聚变
反应中实现“净能量增益” ，即聚变反应产生的能量大于促
发该反应的镭射能量。实验向目标输入了 2.05 兆焦耳的能
量，产生了3.15兆焦耳的聚变能量输出，能量增益达到153%。
美国能源部长詹妮弗·格兰霍姆在一份声明中称，这一突破
是一项“里程碑式的成就”。
劳伦斯利弗莫尔实验室 资料图片
这是新的人类科学历史的重大突破和划时代能源革命，
现代人类正在接近太阳等恒星内部产生的能量模式核聚变
过程，成为造福人类进入清洁能源新纪元！
据劳逊判据：参与反应时等离子气体的密度和对它可
靠约束时间。首先，要求有极高的温度和压力。从宇宙大爆
炸考量太阳的中心温度高达 1500 万摄氏度，并且还有巨大
的压力才能使核聚变正常反应；
444迈特纳先知先觉的人造太阳核聚变；地球上的海水中
含有大量的氘，产生氚的锂也有丰富的储量，是理想的较轻
的原子核（例如氘和氚），揭秘核聚变的燃料都是轻元素。
如氢的同位素（氘 D，氚 T），氘和氚聚变是自然界最容易
发生的聚变， “海水中含有大量的氘”。核聚变能够用少量
的燃料收获巨大的能量；美国人的实验由此揭示核聚变能量
的由来——138亿年宇宙大爆炸产生巨爆能量，在冷却10亿，
形成星系太阳恒星等等诡秘储存着源源不断的核心球内能
量，完全是宇宙“核聚变”模式产生的。从古希腊先知先觉
认识“原子”到现代人科学家研究认识核聚变是两个轻原子
核聚合，生成新的更重原子核的过程，其反应释放的能量巨
大，且不排放二氧化碳，与核裂变相比，它既不产生核废料，
辐射也极少，因此被称为人类的终极能源。
十九、霍金在临离开人类的时候仰天叩问： “我们能在地球
存活吗？”
请看《十问 霍金沉思录》第 7 问：
“我们能在地球存活吗？”
霍金扪心叩问说： “宇宙是一个暴烈的地方，恒星吞没
了行星，超新星在太空发射致命射线、黑洞相互撞击，小行
星每秒疾驶数百英里。我承认，这些现象并未让空间听起来
非常诱人，但这些正是我们要冒险进入太空而非原地不动的
原因。我们无法防御小行星碰撞。我们最后一次大碰撞大约
445发生在 6000 万年前，人们认为恐龙因之灭绝，而它将再次
发生。这不是科幻小说，它受物理定律和概率的保证。
我认为我们正不顾危险地冷漠对待自己在地球上的未
来。”——（131 页）
自做孽不可活！霍金对“我们能在地球存活吗？”回答
是否定的！
原因就在于霍金是宇宙大爆炸理论的创始人，太了解宇
宙大爆炸在至今为止宇宙行星、星系地球、太阳系、小行星
的“爆裂”属性了（已得到韦伯彩照证明）；这就是霍金在
生前的“十大预言”多与宇宙外星人、人类毁灭有关！请看：
霍金预言:十大预言（百科知识）
1、霍金预言:十大预言一，地球将在 200 年内毁灭。霍金表示，
人类如果想一直延续下去，就必须移民火星或其他的星球，而地
球将在 200 年内毁灭。人类要想长期生存，唯一的机会就是离开
地球，适应新星球上的生活，如果两个世纪内人类没有搬离地球，
人类将永远从世界上消失；
2、霍金预言:十大预言二，人类四十年内殖民火星。霍金认为地
球迟早会毁灭，建议人类移民到火星等，不要与外星人联系，他
还表示，过去曾出现过多次人类的生存危机，这种情况的频率还
会增加，我们需要十分谨慎地避免这类危机，但如果人类在未来
446二百年间能成功向外太空扩张，那么人类就能避免灾难，并预言
人类 40 年后就能进驻火星；
3、霍金预言:十大预言三，外星人入侵地球。霍金预言外星人可
能会为资源入侵地球，他表示，人类在努力与外太空其他生命形
式建立联系时应当谨慎小心，因为人类无法确定外星生物是否会
对人类表示友好，如果人类是这个星系中唯一的智能生命体，就
应该确保自己得以生存和延续；
4、霍金预言:十大预言四，基因科技将改良人种。霍金大胆预言，
人类不但会于未来 100 年内在其它星球建立新的生存基地，而且
还会在此后的一个百年内或更早些利用基因科技改良现有人种，
同时表示，不管人类喜欢与否，未来必定会有人在某处设计出改
良品种的人类，预言人类在未来数百年内，将会在子宫以外的地
方培育胚胎；
5、霍金预言:十大预言五，地球将变成“火球”。霍金一直强调，
地球上的生命很可能因某种灾难而灭绝，预言到了公元 2600 年，
地球将会面临人无立足之地的处境，而电力的消耗也会让整个地
球变得“火热”。表示地球的温度将会逐年上升，人类再不控制
二氧化碳等温室气体的排放就会使地球毁灭；
6、霍金预言:十大预言六，人类会被外星人消灭。霍金一直持有
“外星人威胁论”的观点，他认为先进的外星物种不会任由比其
447低级的人类在地球上自由自在地生活而不想着侵占人类的地盘，
不过，也有专家持相反意见，认为如果外星人能来到地球，说明
它们的文明程度远远超过我们人类，高智慧生命体会理智决定它
们必须有分寸地对待其他智慧生命体；
7、霍金预言:十大预言七，人类未来的选择。霍金表示面对地球
的有限资源和呈指数形式增长的人口数量，人类长期生存的唯一
机会并不是留在地球，而是向外太空寻找出路，因此，霍金大力
支持载人航天飞行研究，同时指出，人类有望驾驶宇宙飞船做时
光旅行，霍金乐观的认为以目前人类的科学发展水平，在二百年
内找到适合移居外太空的方法或类地星球是可能的；
8、霍金预言:十大预言八，对于外星生物的构想。霍金认为如果
其它恒星系早已有生命发展，人类在现阶段并没有机会去发现这
些生命，不过人类迟早可能会发现和人类不同的原始生命，但同
时认为，其它星球不太可能已有比人类更先进的生命形式，就算
有，这些生命还无法探索银河系，没发现地球；
9、霍金预言:十大预言九，人工智能将会代替人类。霍金曾多次
声称，人工智能系统非常危险，可能会颠覆人类甚至取代人类，
如今人工智能的发展趋势还并不稳定，人类对人工智能也不能完
全掌控，很多科学家表示人类不能太过深入的发展人工智能，一
旦人工智能获得自主意识就会适得其反；
44810、霍金预言:十大预言十，将来会出现一种新的人种。霍金表
示，地球人类的 DNA 将会以极快速度变得更加复杂，地球人研发
改良人种将会造成许多问题，人类掌握了基因编辑技术之后，就
会设计出一种与现有人类特征高度相仿的物种，会在各领域取代
人类，帮助人类完成日常生产和工作，同时表示新人种的诞生可
能是人类文明消亡的开始...
二十、霍金来不急看到俄乌战争引爆核战争毁灭世界
人类近在咫尺就永远离开了我们
霍金十大预言还没有预言战争引爆核战争毁灭世
界人类近在咫尺！核弹威力究竟有多大？300 枚就能
让人类消失，这绝不是天方夜谭！
全球现有 14450 枚核弹，能让全人类消失 48.16
次！
人类啊！恐怖吗！？害怕吗？不淡定吗？！
战争自人类诞生就有之，3000 年荷马史诗的《伊
利亚特》就是战争最血腥、最残酷的历史见证；2022
年“2.24”俄罗斯入侵乌克兰爆发了第二次世界大战
以来最残酷、范围最广、多国的战争，已经形成 40
国对付俄罗斯的大国战争、俄乌战争已经进入第二个
年头，结束战争还不知道在何年何月！？
“核战争”的叫嚣此起彼伏、不绝于耳！——联
449合国秘书长古特雷斯在开幕会上警告称，一个误解和
一个错误的判断就可能将人类带向核毁灭的深渊。
（2022 年 8 月 1 日）——美俄各执一词【美方在 npt
审议大会上还将矛头指向俄在乌特别军事行动。美国
国务卿布林肯 1 日声称，俄罗斯在乌克兰扎波罗热核
电站周围发动攻击“极度不负责任” ，并指责莫斯科
将乌核电站用作袭击乌军的“核盾牌”。俄常驻联合
国代表团 2 日在其官网上发表声明称，俄方完全拒绝
此类指控。“需要注意的是，在扎波罗热核电站，除
了确保其安全所需的数量有限的军事人员外，俄没有
部署部队。扎波罗热核电站受到保护，以防止乌武装
分子进行具有不可预测后果的核挑衅。”俄代表团还
称，最近乌武装分子利用无人机对核电站进行了多次
挑衅，其中包括使用北约国家的无人机。】……
“霍金一直强调，地球上的生命很可能因某种灾
难而灭绝， ”看来，核战争毁灭人类选项是迟早的事
了——核爆炸、核聚变彰显了宇宙大爆炸巨爆原力秘
密蕴藏的真实存在！……霍金告诫： “我认为我们正
不顾危险地冷漠对待自己在地球上的未来。”随着美
国 2022 年 12 月 13 日完成里程碑式成就、打开了潘多
拉匣子宇宙大爆炸原力（核爆炸、核聚变）毁灭地球
全人类，只在一念之差——这就是我们研究撰写完成
450《整体板块遗传律——宇宙大爆炸整体生命学》的初
衷！
结束语
小时候，妈妈总是问我：世界上“先有鸡？” 、 “还是
先有蛋？”……我说先有蛋！妈妈总是笑而不答；我懂事了，
有一天，我和妈妈坐在自家小院，突然看到一大花公鸡炸着
两个翅膀，追赶两个母鸡，母鸡咯咯哒叫着并不奔跑，花公
鸡就踩在母鸡身上不停地呵呵呵……
我奇怪地问妈妈： “花公鸡疯了吧？”我说着就要拣小
石子……
“别打啊！花公鸡正在踩蛋……”
我长大了读过《生命是什么》才知道薛定谔说的“现在
我们知道，整个四维模式都是由一个细胞即受精卵的结构决
定的。 ”——这就是妈妈说的“踩蛋”（受精卵）！——生
命起源于“受精卵”即“两性生殖” ，植物和动物、微生物、
细菌，地球上所有生命几乎都是同样的“两性生殖” ，这就
是宇宙整体生殖系统与模式，她来自宇宙大爆炸！
按着薛定谔说的“把所有已知的知识综合成为一个统一
的整体； ”我们开始撰写《整体板块遗传律——宇宙大爆炸
整体生命学》，就必须把薛定谔《自然与希腊人科学人文主
义》和霍金宇宙大爆炸理论、特别是薛定谔《生命是什么》
451452
诸多科学理论从希腊人到现代人统统整合起来。这就是本著
作的主旨。
薛定谔把物理学和生物学整合、通过热力学和量子力学
理论来解释生命的本质，提出三个问题：
是从信息学的角
度提出了遗传密码的概念，提出了大分子――非周期性晶
体――作为遗传物质（基因）模型； 特别是从量子力学的角
度，论证了基因的持久性和遗传模式的长期稳定性的可能性
——这是薛定谔对生命灵魂量子基因追朔古希腊到现代最深
邃的“量子纠缠”终极叩问-【原子或量子--由来已久的咒语
破解术,避开连续体的复杂性——《自然与希腊人科学与人文
主义》125 页
尽管如此,我们试着从各个角度来考察一下这个
问题似乎是值得的。我曾在本讲演中触及的一种观点
是,目前物理科学中的困难与内在于连续体观念的臭
名昭著的概念复杂性有关。但这并没有说出很多东
西。它们是如何联系在一起的?其相互关系到底是什
么?
看一下物理学在最近半个世纪的发展,你会产生
一种印象.即自然界的不连续特征在很大程度上是有
违我们意愿地被强加给我们的。连续体似乎让我们感
到很舒心。能量不连续交换的观念使马克斯·普朗克
大为惊恐,这种观念是他 1900 年为了解释黑体辐射中的能量分布而引人的。他做了很多努力来弱化这一
假说，并且尽可能地摆脱它,但终未成功。25 年后,
波动力学的发明者们曾一度希望已经为回到经典的
连续描述铺平了道路,但事实再次证明,这一希望是
靠不住的。自然本身似乎拒斥连续描述,这种拒斥似
乎与数学家处理连续体时的困惑毫无关系。
这就是你从最近 50 年中得到的印象。但量子理
论还要再往前追溯 24 个世纪到留基伯和德谟克利
特。他们发明了第一个不连续体--嵌在虚空中的孤立
原子。我们的基本粒子概念无论从历史上还是从观念
上都源自他们的原子概念。我们只是坚持了它。这些
粒子现在已经被证明是能量子,因为正如爱因斯坦
1905 年发现的那样,物质与能量是同一种东西。所以
不连续的观念是非常古老的。它是如何产生的呢?我
想说明，它其实源于连续体的复杂性,可以说是对付
它的一种武器。
古代原子论者是如何想到物质的原子论观念的
呢?现在,这个问题不仅具有历史意义,而且变得与认
识论密切相关了。有时这个问题会以下述方式提出来,
人们不无惊讶地问道:那些思想家对物理定律的了解
极为贫乏,对所有相关实验事实全然不知,他们是如
何想出关于物体构成的正确理论的呢?有时你会看到,
453人们觉得这种“幸运的发现”是如此令人困惑,以至
于宣称它是一个偶然事件,并拒绝认为古代原子论者
有什么功劳。他们声称,古代原子论者的原子理论是
一种毫无根据的猜想,事实也可能证明它是一个错
误。不用说,得出这一奇特结论的肯定是科学家,而绝
不会是古典学者。
我拒绝接受这种说法,但我必须回答这个问题。
这并不很难。原子论者和他们的想法并非无中生有。
在他们之前一个多世纪，米利都的泰勒斯已经开始了
伟大的新发明。原子论者沿着爱奥尼亚自然哲学家那
条令人敬畏的道路继续走了下去。在这条道路上,原
子论者的直接先驱是阿那克西美尼,其主要学说在于
强调“稀释和凝聚”的重要性。通过认真思考日常经
验,他抽象出一个论点:任何物质都能表现为固态、液
态、气态和“火”态,这些状态之间的变化并不意味
着本性的改变,而是源于几何变化,仿佛等量的物质
被扩展到越来越大的体积(稀释),或者反过来,被减
小或压缩到越来越小的体积中(凝聚)。这种观念是如
此切中要害，以至于现代的物理科学导论可以不做任
何修改地采用它。此外，它肯定不是一种毫无根据的
猜想，而是认真观察的结果。】
事实上，《生命是什么》不是普通的科学著作而是伟大
454的历史文献、薛定谔最早思考并用量子纠缠理论揭开基因的
神秘量子属性，才开启双螺旋、遗传密码本（染色体）“我在
生物学家所谓‘四维模式’的意义上使用有机体的‘模式’这
个词，它不仅指成年有机体或任何其他阶段有机体的结构和功
能，而且指有机体开始繁殖自身时，从受精卵到成年阶段的个
体发育全过程。现在我们知道，整个四维模式都是由一个细胞
即受精卵的结构决定的。我们还知道，它本质上只是由受精卵
的一小部分即细胞核的结构所决定的。在细胞的正常‘休止期’
内，这个细胞核通常显示为网状染色质分散在细胞内。但在极
为重要的细胞分裂（有丝分裂和减数分裂，见下文）过程中，
可以看到它由一组通常呈纤维状或棒状的被称为染色体的颗
粒所组成，其数目是 8 个或 12 个，人是 48 个。但我其实应该
把这些数目写成 2×4，2×6，……，2×24，……，并且按照
生物学家惯常意义上的表述，把它称为两套染色体。因为虽然
单个染色体有时可以从它的形状和大小清楚地加以区分和辨
认，但这里的两套染色体几乎完全相同。我们很快就会看到，
其中一套来自母体（卵细胞），另一套来自父体（精子）。正
是这些染色体，或者我们在显微镜下看到的染色体的一种轴状
骨架纤丝，把个体的未来发育及其成年期机能的全部模式都包
含在某种密码本中。每一整套染色体都包含有全部密码；因此
一般而言，构成未来个体最初阶段的受精卵里包含有密码的两
个副本。遗传下来的实际上是“表现型”的整个（四维）模式，
455是个体的可见的、明显的本性，它们被复制了好几代而没有什
么明显改变，在数个世纪里持久恒定（虽然不能说是数万年不
变），在每一次传递中，负载它们的是结合生成受精卵的两个
细胞的物质结构。这真是个奇迹。”-《生命是什么》
“机体中在实际上可以认为是均匀的那种温度，就将热力
学的要求归结成了自由能的固定不变或稳步递减。因此，看来
可以这样假设：一切永久出现或暂时出现的大分子结构
（macromolecular structures）的形成，代表着一些本质上
不可逆的过程，这些过程在营养和呼吸所保持的有利条件下增
加着机体的稳定性。当然，正如布瑞顿（Britten）和伽莫夫
（Gamow）近来曾经讨论过的，植物中的光合作用，也是由全
面的熵增过程伴随着的。” ——玻尔《再论光和生命》
也就是说，光合作用与“熵”成为现代整体生命科学学起
源之前沿！
根据“大爆炸后 1011 秒（104 亿年），温度约为 105
开尔文，物质期。在宇宙早期历史中，光主宰着各能量形
式。”现代人科学家发现的量子力学就与宇宙大爆炸后
（1011 秒（104 亿年）诞生，自然而然存在“量子纠缠”秘
籍在宇宙大爆炸神秘隐匿；太阳系的秩序和行星的运动几乎
被无限期地维持着。此刻的星座与金字塔时代任一时刻的星
座是直接相关的；从现在的星座可以追溯到那时的星座。宇
宙大爆炸一开始（大爆炸后 10-12 秒：约 1015 度，粒子期）
456大爆炸就运用量子纠缠创造了一种不可分割的整体和一种
隐含的秩序-宇宙万物，并证明原力是“量子纠缠”初始存
在的微观量子本原。对于一个处于纠缠态的多粒子系统，其
量子态函数不能分解成各个部分的量子态的乘积。通俗的
讲，量子纠缠指的是在空间上分开的两个或多个粒子，由于
某种相互作用，使得各个粒子所拥有的信息或物理性质成为
了整体特性而无法分离，这就是为何称为“纠缠” ；这一切
已经得到 2022 年诺贝尔物理学获奖科学家 Alain Aspect、
John F. Clauser 和 Anton Zeilinger.实验证明，事实胜于
雄辩——这就是宇宙大爆炸整体生命学的起源！
附录
托马斯论“机制”
题记： “刘易斯准则”-美国著名医学家刘易斯·托马斯，
经过一生医学实践，对这方面的有精彩论述： “我认为，过去半
个世纪的记录确立了两条关于人类疾病的普遍原则。第一，必须
多多了解疾病的潜在机理,才能真正采取有效的行动；必须知道，
是肺炎双球菌引起了大叶肺炎，才能想到用抗生素，用不着知道
所有细节，甚至用不着知道肺炎双球菌是怎样对肺造成损害的，
但你得知道它在哪儿，并且起着决定的作用。
第二，每一种疾病都有一单个关键的机制，压过其它所有机制。
如果能找到它，然后想出法子来对付它，就能够控制那种疾患。
457这一概括较难证明，并且容易有争议，与其说是一条科学论断。
倒不如说它是一个强烈的预感，可我相信，迄今为止的记录倾向
于支持这一预感。我所知道的最为复杂的牵涉到多细胞，多组织，
而且多器官的疾病，是三期梅毒，慢性结核病，还有顽固性贫血。
在每一种情况中，至少有三个器官和组织卷了进去，而且每一器
官，每一组织，似乎都受到许多环境因素的影响。在对之进行科
学评估之前，每一种都被认为是我们现在所说的“多因素”疾病。
它过于复杂，不允许人们考虑任何一单个发病机制，然而，当所
有必要的事实都到手时，很清楚，只要关掉一件事情——螺旋杆
菌，结核杆菌，或者是那一种维生素缺乏，那么，整套紊乱的，
似乎不相干的发病机理都能够一下子全关掉了。”托马斯的两个
普遍原则：潜在机理和环境因素影响的“多因素”单个机制的本
质就是对微生态的预言和表述。因为他强调： “我们关于自己知
之甚少。关于我们如何运作，占什么位置，最要紧的是关于我们
扎根于其中作为工作部件的这个巨大的，不可思议的生命系统，
我们是无知的。我们并不了解自然，一点都不了解。”
托马斯论“机制”是《细胞生命的礼赞》（全书前部分一到
九十九）对“机制”论述的节选、自成机制理论曰：
《托马斯论“机制”》
一、我们生活在由舞蹈跳荡的病毒组成的阵体中，它们象蜜蜂一
样，从一个生物窜向另一个生物，从植物跳到昆虫跳到哺乳动物
跳到我又跳回去，也跳到海里，抱着几片这样的基因组，又拉上
458几条那样的基因组，移植着 dna 的接穗，象大型宴会上递菜一样
传递着遗传特征。它们也许是一种机制，使新的、突变型 dna 在
我们中间最广泛地流通着。如果真是这样，那么，我们在医学领
域必须如此集中注意的奇怪的病毒性疾病，就可被看作是意外事
故，是哪里出了点疏漏。
二、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一场战
斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那种冷
漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很久就
业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成一块
块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们的形
态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮的实
验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其中较
小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小者控
制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不是火
力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必就令
人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
三、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，叶
绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养中，
遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一些杂
种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设计得
非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些相当
卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，盖过
459地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
四、齐曼（ziman,j.m.）在近期《自然》杂志上着文指出， “发
明一种机制，把科学研究工作中获得的片片断断的知识系统地公
布于世，一定算得上现代科学史上的关键性事件”。
五、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿鞋的
人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔地，
只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类气味
研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合资建
立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的问题。
这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行研究
的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明的狗
能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许就得
从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素相对
浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的人们
应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们弄清
楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、能
发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者的
另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给者，
等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或许能
成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方面转
移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
六、其他动物也赋有类似的发出信号的机制。成队的蚂蚁在路上
460爬行时可嗅出同群和其他蚂蚁的区别。蚂蚁熙熙攘攘过路，留下
踪迹，亲近的蚂蚁可以跟踪，别的蚂蚁就不能。
七、我们周围的动物都有这么些奇妙的感觉技术。为此，我们感
觉到有些低人一等，它们有的我们没有。有时，为消除这种失落
感（或感觉的失落），我们自我安慰，我们早已在演化过程中把
这些原始的机制抛在身后了。我们总爱把嗅球看成是某种考古学
发现，而提到人脑中古老的嗅觉区时，好象它们是些上年纪的、
疯疯癫癫的亲戚，需要有些嗜好。
八、不同动物之间用于通讯的嗅觉感受器，对于建立共生系统来
说是至关重要的。蟹和海葵依靠分子构型认出彼此是伙伴，海葵
和跟它共生的少女鱼也是这样。类似的装置还被用于自卫，比如
帽贝，它用来防御食肉的海星的方法是将套膜外翻，使海星失去
一个立足点；帽贝能感觉出一种特别的海星蛋白。公平地说，所
有海星都制造这种蛋白，释放至周围的环境。这种系统显然是古
老的一种，比我们现在为识别彼此而如此倚重的抗体的免疫感知
早得多。最近已知，细胞抗原标记自我的那些基因和那些通过抗
体形成而发生免疫反应的基因有着密切的联系。有可能，抗体的
创生，来自共生所需的早期感觉机制，这种机制可能部分是用来
避免共生活动失控。
九、一切生物，不管是植物还是动物，它们之间进行化学通讯的
非 常 普 遍 的 系 统 ， 被 惠 特 克 （ whittaker,r.h. ） 称 为
“ allelochemics ”（不同种间化学作用）。每一种生命形式都
461用这种或那种信号，对周围的其他生物宣布它在近处，向来犯者
划定界限，或向潜在的共生者散发出欢迎的信号。总的效果，是
形成一种调节生长速度和领土占领的协调机制。这显然是用来使
地球自我平衡的。
十、后来，他历历在目地回忆起那段经过。他是那样惊异于与死
亡相联的那不同寻常的安宁、平静和绝无痛楚的感觉。于是他创
造了一种理论，说所有动物都有一种保护性的生理机制，在死亡
的边缘开始起作用，将它们在一团平静的云雾中带到彼岸。
十一、我只有一次见过死亡的痛苦，那是在一个狂犬病患者身
上。长达二十四小时之内，他极其清楚地知道他自身解体过程的
每一步，直到最后一息。在狂犬病人的特别神经病理学中，好象
保护机制遇到障碍，没有开启。
十二、竟然想到死亡这件事没有什么不好，我自己都觉得吃惊。
但也许不该吃惊。死亡毕竟是一种最古老、最基本的生物机能，
它所形成的机制同样注意入微，是有利于保持生物特性的遗传的
信息来指引生物通过死亡的每一步，象我们司空见惯的生命的所
有其他关键活动一样。
十三、那意识到底跑哪去了？莫非它只是立时倒毙，失落在腐殖
质里，变成废物了？考虑到大自然有为复杂难解的机制派上用场
的趋势，意识消失这事在我看来是不自然的。我宁愿认为，它不
知怎的跟它所悬附的细丝分开，然后象轻吸一口气一样缩回到它
所从来的膜里，成为生物圈神经系统的一点新的记忆，然而我没
462有任何资料证实这件事。
十四、沃森（watson,j.a.l）、内尔（nel,j.j.c.）和休伊特
（hewitt,p.h.）三人曾经从野外收集到大量白蚁，把它们放在
一起，有的成群，有的成对，进行观察。放在一群的白蚁变得越
来越友好而好动，但没有表示产卵或交配的意向；相反，它们缩
减摄水量，注意减肥，其飞行肌肉的线粒体代谢活动增快。被聚
集成群的白蚁不断地用触角互相接触，而这似乎是中心的控制机
制。重要的是被触而不是去触动。去掉触角，任何白蚁仍可成为
群体中的白蚁，只要足够频繁地被其他白蚁接触。
十五、 “人们把群居性昆虫和人类社会作了很多类比，这是不奇
怪的。然而，从根本上说，这些类比是错误的，或是没有意义的。
因为，昆虫的行为是由先天的指令性机制严格定型和决定的；它
们很少甚至全然没有学习的领悟力和能力，它们缺乏一种根据许
多世代累积的经验发展社会传统的能力。”
十六、近年来，还有一些新的领域一直在扩大和加强着，生物膜、
免疫学、遗传学，还有细胞调节机制等学科正在飞速发展。
十七、在炎热的仲夏的周末，你可以看到那支配的机制是怎样运
行的：海滩上很挤，人们得掂着脚找来找去，才能找见一块歇歇
腿的地方。但不管怎样，总是有很多人站着。生物学家似乎喜欢
站在海滩上，彼此讲话，打着手势，弯下腰在沙上划着图形。到
夜幕降临的时候，沙上已横竖交叉着乱七八糟的纵坐标、横坐标
和曲线。那都是为了解释自然界各种事物的。
463十八、对于我们在身体内部进行的那些复杂、协调、奇巧无比的
操作，规则又不同了。我们不需要学任何事情。我们的平滑肌细
胞生来带有全套指令，一点也不需要我们帮助，而是按自己的计
划一路工作着，调节着血管的口径，把食物移经肠道，根据整个
系统的要求开启或关闭管道；分泌细胞秘密地制造着它们的产
品；心脏收缩；扩张、荷尔蒙被发送出去，跟细胞膜不声不响地
进行反应，使腺苷基环化酶、前列腺素以及其他信号开了又关；
细胞之间靠互相接触彼此进行通讯；细胞器向别的细胞器发出讯
息。所有这些都在不停地进行，我们并没有对它们说什么悄悄话。
整个安排是一个生态系统，其中每一部分的操作都由其他所有部
分的状态和活动制约着。事情通常是顺利地进行，这是一个万无
一失的机制。
十九、用心不错，却带来致命的结局。这个反应机制本身是相当
好的，只要运用得当有度，其对付单个细菌侵入的作用还是大可
赞叹的：它把血细胞召到现场，逐出可凝蛋白，细菌陷入罗网，
失去活动能力，这事儿就整个儿地了结了。只有当遭遇到大量内
毒素自由分子的信号，让肌体想起了大量弧菌的存在时，鲎才惊
惶失措，一下子使出了自卫的浑身解数，这才把自己毁了。
二十、我觉得，我们的大多数疾病很可能都是这样得的。有些时
候，滥杀的机制是有免疫作用的，但象鲎的例子中一样，经常是
一些更加远古的记忆。我们因一些信号就把自己撕毁成碎片，我
们在这些信号面前非常脆弱，比在任何食肉兽群面前还脆弱。实
464际上，我们在受着自身的五角大楼的摆布。大多数时候是这样。
二十一、如果说，语言处在我们社会存在的核心，把我们聚拢在
一起，用意义的大厦覆蔽着我们。那么，也可以同样有把握地说，
美术和音乐乃是那同一个遗传决定的普遍机制的作用。大家一起
做做这些也算不得坏事。如果因此我们就成了群居性生物，就跟
蚂蚁一样，那么，至少我（或者我应该说至少我们？）是不会介
意的。
二十二、病毒，原先被看作是一心一意制造疾病和死亡的主儿，
现在却渐渐现出活动基因的样子。演化的过程仍旧是遥无尽期、
冗长乏味的生物牌局，唯有胜者才能留在桌边继续玩下去，但玩
的规则似乎渐趋灵活了。我们生活在由舞蹈跳荡的病毒组成的阵
体中，它们象蜜蜂一样，从一个生物窜向另一个生物，从植物跳
到昆虫跳到哺乳动物跳到我又跳回去，也跳到海里，抱着几片这
样的基因组，又拉上几条那样的基因组，移植着 dna 的接穗，象
大型宴会上递菜一样传递着遗传特征。它们也许是一种机制，使
新的、突变型 dna 在我们中间最广泛地流通着。如果真是这样，
那么，我们在医学领域必须如此集中注意的奇怪的病毒性疾病，
就可被看作是意外事故，是哪里出了点疏漏。
二十三、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一
场战斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那
种冷漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很
久就业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成
465一块块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们
的形态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮
的实验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其
中较小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小
者控制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不
是火力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必
就令人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
二十四、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，
叶绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养
中，遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一
些杂种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设
计得非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些
相当卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，
盖过地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
二十五、科学中使用的通讯系统应能为研究人类社会信息积累机
制提供简洁而易操作的模型。
齐曼（ziman,j.m.）在近期《自然》杂志上着文指出， “发明一
种机制，把科学研究工作中获得的片片断断的知识系统地公布于
世，一定算得上现代科学史上的关键性事件”。
他接着写道：
一份期刊把各种各样……大家普遍感兴趣的知识，从一个研究者
传递给另一个研究者……。一篇典型的科学论文总是认为自己不
466过是一条大锯上的又一个锯齿——它本身并不重要，但却是一个
更大项目的一个分子。〔这种技术，这种使得许许多多以微薄的
贡献进入人类知识库的技术，乃是 17 世纪以来西方科学的秘密
所在，因为它获得了一种远远超过任何个人所能发出的共同的、
集体的力量〕（〔〕内的着重号是本书作者加的）。
改换几个术语，降低一下格调，这段话就可以用来描绘营造白蚁
窝的工作。
有一件事让人叫绝：探索（explore）一词不能适用于探索活动
的搜索一面，但却起源于我们在探索时发出的声音（英文
explore，其语源拉丁语 explorare 有“喊出”之意——译者）。
我们愿意认为，科学上的探索是一种孤独的、静思的事。是的，
在最初几个阶段是这样。但后来，或迟或早，在工作行将完成时，
我们总要一边探索，一边互相呼唤，交流信息，发表文章，给编
辑写信，提交论文，一有发现就大叫起来。
二十六、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿
鞋的人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔
地，只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类
气味研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合
资建立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的
问题。这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行
研究的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明
的狗能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许
467就得从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素
相对浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的
人们应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们
弄清楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、
能发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者
的另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给
者，等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或
许能成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方
面转移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
二十七、其他动物也赋有类似的发出信号的机制。成队的蚂蚁在
路上爬行时可嗅出同群和其他蚂蚁的区别。蚂蚁熙熙攘攘过路，
留下踪迹，亲近的蚂蚁可以跟踪，别的蚂蚁就不能。
有些蚂蚁是食肉蚁，生来就具有觉察到它们惯于捉来作奴隶的蚁
类踪迹的本事，跟踪受害者，直到它们的巢穴，释放出特殊的气
味物质，使受害蚁群惊慌溃乱。
鱥鱼和鲶鱼可以通过个体特有的气味辨别出同类中的每一个成
员。很难想象，有一个独居的、独立的、存在主义者鱥鱼，单个
儿挑出来能被认出；处在群体中的鱥鱼，在行为上象一个动物体
内可以互相替换的相同部件，但个体还是存在。
二十八、我们周围的动物都有这么些奇妙的感觉技术。为此，我
468们感觉到有些低人一等，它们有的我们没有。有时，为消除这种
失落感（或感觉的失落），我们自我安慰，我们早已在演化过程
中把这些原始的机制抛在身后了。我们总爱把嗅球看成是某种考
古学发现，而提到人脑中古老的嗅觉区时，好象它们是些上年纪
的、疯疯癫癫的亲戚，需要有些嗜好。
二十九、不同动物之间用于通讯的嗅觉感受器，对于建立共生系
统来说是至关重要的。蟹和海葵依靠分子构型认出彼此是伙伴，
海葵和跟它共生的少女鱼也是这样。类似的装置还被用于自卫，
比如帽贝，它用来防御食肉的海星的方法是将套膜外翻，使海星
失去一个立足点；帽贝能感觉出一种特别的海星蛋白。公平地说，
所有海星都制造这种蛋白，释放至周围的环境。这种系统显然是
古老的一种，比我们现在为识别彼此而如此倚重的抗体的免疫感
知早得多。最近已知，细胞抗原标记自我的那些基因和那些通过
抗体形成而发生免疫反应的基因有着密切的联系。有可能，抗体
的创生，来自共生所需的早期感觉机制，这种机制可能部分是用
来避免共生活动失控。
三十、一切生物，不管是植物还是动物，它们之间进行化学通讯
的 非 常 普 遍 的 系 统 ， 被 惠 特 克 （ whittaker,r.h. ） 称 为
“ allelochemics ”（不同种间化学作用）。每一种生命形式都
用这种或那种信号，对周围的其他生物宣布它在近处，向来犯者
划定界限，或向潜在的共生者散发出欢迎的信号。总的效果，是
形成一种调节生长速度和领土占领的协调机制。这显然是用来使
469地球自我平衡的。
三十一、后来，他历历在目地回忆起那段经过。他是那样惊异于
与死亡相联的那不同寻常的安宁、平静和绝无痛楚的感觉。于是
他创造了一种理论，说所有动物都有一种保护性的生理机制，在
死亡的边缘开始起作用，将它们在一团平静的云雾中带到彼岸。
三十二、我只有一次见过死亡的痛苦，那是在一个狂犬病患者身
上。长达二十四小时之内，他极其清楚地知道他自身解体过程的
每一步，直到最后一息。在狂犬病人的特别神经病理学中，好象
保护机制遇到障碍，没有开启。
三十三、竟然想到死亡这件事没有什么不好，我自己都觉得吃惊。
但也许不该吃惊。死亡毕竟是一种最古老、最基本的生物机能，
它所形成的机制同样注意入微，是有利于保持生物特性的遗传的
信息来指引生物通过死亡的每一步，象我们司空见惯的生命的所
有其他关键活动一样。
三十四、那意识到底跑哪去了？莫非它只是立时倒毙，失落在腐
殖质里，变成废物了？考虑到大自然有为复杂难解的机制派上用
场的趋势，意识消失这事在我看来是不自然的。我宁愿认为，它
不知怎的跟它所悬附的细丝分开，然后象轻吸一口气一样缩回到
它所从来的膜里，成为生物圈神经系统的一点新的记忆，然而我
没有任何资料证实这件事。
三十五、沃森（watson,j.a.l）、内尔（nel,j.j.c.）和休伊特
（hewitt,p.h.）三人曾经从野外收集到大量白蚁，把它们放在
470一起，有的成群，有的成对，进行观察。放在一群的白蚁变得越
来越友好而好动，但没有表示产卵或交配的意向；相反，它们缩
减摄水量，注意减肥，其飞行肌肉的线粒体代谢活动增快。被聚
集成群的白蚁不断地用触角互相接触，而这似乎是中心的控制机
制。重要的是被触而不是去触动。去掉触角，任何白蚁仍可成为
群体中的白蚁，只要足够频繁地被其他白蚁接触。
三十六、 “人们把群居性昆虫和人类社会作了很多类比，这是不
奇怪的。然而，从根本上说，这些类比是错误的，或是没有意义
的。因为，昆虫的行为是由先天的指令性机制严格定型和决定的；
它们很少甚至全然没有学习的领悟力和能力，它们缺乏一种根据
许多世代累积的经验发展社会传统的能力。”
三十七、近年来，还有一些新的领域一直在扩大和加强着，生物
膜、免疫学、遗传学，还有细胞调节机制等学科正在飞速发展。
三十八、在炎热的仲夏的周末，你可以看到那支配的机制是怎样
运行的：海滩上很挤，人们得掂着脚找来找去，才能找见一块歇
歇腿的地方。但不管怎样，总是有很多人站着。生物学家似乎喜
欢站在海滩上，彼此讲话，打着手势，弯下腰在沙上划着图形。
到夜幕降临的时候，沙上已横竖交叉着乱七八糟的纵坐标、横坐
标和曲线。那都是为了解释自然界各种事物的。
三十九、我们身体中用以迎战细菌的火药这样猛烈，又牵涉这样
多的防御机制，它们对我们的危险性比入侵者还要大。我们周身
都是爆炸装置；我们全身布满了地雷。
471是细菌带来的信息让我们受不了。
四十、病毒，原先被看作是一心一意制造疾病和死亡的主儿，现
在却渐渐现出活动基因的样子。演化的过程仍旧是遥无尽期、冗
长乏味的生物牌局，唯有胜者才能留在桌边继续玩下去，但玩的
规则似乎渐趋灵活了。我们生活在由舞蹈跳荡的病毒组成的阵体
中，它们象蜜蜂一样，从一个生物窜向另一个生物，从植物跳到
昆虫跳到哺乳动物跳到我又跳回去，也跳到海里，抱着几片这样
的基因组，又拉上几条那样的基因组，移植着 dna 的接穗，象大
型宴会上递菜一样传递着遗传特征。它们也许是一种机制，使新
的、突变型 dna 在我们中间最广泛地流通着。如果真是这样，那
么，我们在医学领域必须如此集中注意的奇怪的病毒性疾病，就
可被看作是意外事故，是哪里出了点疏漏。
四十一、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一
场战斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那
种冷漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很
久就业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成
一块块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们
的形态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮
的实验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其
中较小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小
者控制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不
472是火力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必
就令人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
四十二、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，
叶绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养
中，遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一
些杂种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设
计得非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些
相当卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，
盖过地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
四十三、科学中使用的通讯系统应能为研究人类社会信息积累机
制提供简洁而易操作的模型。
齐曼（ziman,j.m.）在近期《自然》杂志上着文指出， “发明一
种机制，把科学研究工作中获得的片片断断的知识系统地公布于
世，一定算得上现代科学史上的关键性事件”。
四十四、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿
鞋的人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔
地，只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类
气味研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合
资建立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的
问题。这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行
研究的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明
的狗能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许
473就得从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素
相对浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的
人们应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们
弄清楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、
能发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者
的另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给
者，等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或
许能成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方
面转移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
四十五、其他动物也赋有类似的发出信号的机制。成队的蚂蚁在
路上爬行时可嗅出同群和其他蚂蚁的区别。蚂蚁熙熙攘攘过路，
留下踪迹，亲近的蚂蚁可以跟踪，别的蚂蚁就不能。
四十六、我们周围的动物都有这么些奇妙的感觉技术。为此，我
们感觉到有些低人一等，它们有的我们没有。有时，为消除这种
失落感（或感觉的失落），我们自我安慰，我们早已在演化过程
中把这些原始的机制抛在身后了。我们总爱把嗅球看成是某种考
古学发现，而提到人脑中古老的嗅觉区时，好象它们是些上年纪
的、疯疯癫癫的亲戚，需要有些嗜好。
四十七、不同动物之间用于通讯的嗅觉感受器，对于建立共生系
统来说是至关重要的。蟹和海葵依靠分子构型认出彼此是伙伴，
海葵和跟它共生的少女鱼也是这样。类似的装置还被用于自卫，
比如帽贝，它用来防御食肉的海星的方法是将套膜外翻，使海星
474失去一个立足点；帽贝能感觉出一种特别的海星蛋白。公平地说，
所有海星都制造这种蛋白，释放至周围的环境。这种系统显然是
古老的一种，比我们现在为识别彼此而如此倚重的抗体的免疫感
知早得多。最近已知，细胞抗原标记自我的那些基因和那些通过
抗体形成而发生免疫反应的基因有着密切的联系。有可能，抗体
的创生，来自共生所需的早期感觉机制，这种机制可能部分是用
来避免共生活动失控。
四十八、一切生物，不管是植物还是动物，它们之间进行化学通
讯的非常普遍的系统，被惠特克（whittaker,r.h.）称为
“ allelochemics ”（不同种间化学作用）。每一种生命形式都
用这种或那种信号，对周围的其他生物宣布它在近处，向来犯者
划定界限，或向潜在的共生者散发出欢迎的信号。总的效果，是
形成一种调节生长速度和领土占领的协调机制。这显然是用来使
地球自我平衡的。
四十九、后来，他历历在目地回忆起那段经过。他是那样惊异于
与死亡相联的那不同寻常的安宁、平静和绝无痛楚的感觉。于是
他创造了一种理论，说所有动物都有一种保护性的生理机制，在
死亡的边缘开始起作用，将它们在一团平静的云雾中带到彼岸。
五十、
我只有一次见过死亡的痛苦，那是在一个狂犬病患者身上。长达
二十四小时之内，他极其清楚地知道他自身解体过程的每一步，
直到最后一息。在狂犬病人的特别神经病理学中，好象保护机制
475遇到障碍，没有开启。
五十一、竟然想到死亡这件事没有什么不好，我自己都觉得吃惊。
但也许不该吃惊。死亡毕竟是一种最古老、最基本的生物机能，
它所形成的机制同样注意入微，是有利于保持生物特性的遗传的
信息来指引生物通过死亡的每一步，象我们司空见惯的生命的所
有其他关键活动一样。
五十二、那意识到底跑哪去了？莫非它只是立时倒毙，失落在腐
殖质里，变成废物了？考虑到大自然有为复杂难解的机制派上用
场的趋势，意识消失这事在我看来是不自然的。我宁愿认为，它
不知怎的跟它所悬附的细丝分开，然后象轻吸一口气一样缩回到
它所从来的膜里，成为生物圈神经系统的一点新的记忆，然而我
没有任何资料证实这件事。
五十三、
那意识到底跑哪去了？莫非它只是立时倒毙，失落在腐殖质里，
变成废物了？考虑到大自然有为复杂难解的机制派上用场的趋
势，意识消失这事在我看来是不自然的。我宁愿认为，它不知怎
的跟它所悬附的细丝分开，然后象轻吸一口气一样缩回到它所从
来的膜里，成为生物圈神经系统的一点新的记忆，然而我没有任
何资料证实这件事。
五十四、 “人们把群居性昆虫和人类社会作了很多类比，这是不
奇怪的。然而，从根本上说，这些类比是错误的，或是没有意义
的。因为，昆虫的行为是由先天的指令性机制严格定型和决定的；
476它们很少甚至全然没有学习的领悟力和能力，它们缺乏一种根据
许多世代累积的经验发展社会传统的能力。”
五十五、无脊椎动物的眼睛在海洋生物学实验站被发现是一架光
学仪器，为现代视觉生理学开辟了道路。伍兹霍尔枪乌贼的巨大
神经轴索成为创立今天令人惊奇的神经生物学的契机。发生生物
学和生殖生物学在这里被承认和定义为科学。这两门科学从海胆
卵研究开始，以后就稳步发展起来。海洋生物的模型在肌肉结构
与功能研究的早期曾经是至关重要的，而关于肌肉的研究已成了
海洋生物学实验站的主要的当务之急。生态学在这里很早就是一
门严肃的、有人员勤勉从事的科学，比我们其他人发现这一学科
要早数十年。
近年来，还有一些新的领域一直在扩大和加强着，生物膜、免疫
学、遗传学，还有细胞调节机制等学科正在飞速发展。
五十六、在炎热的仲夏的周末，你可以看到那支配的机制是怎样
运行的：海滩上很挤，人们得掂着脚找来找去，才能找见一块歇
歇腿的地方。但不管怎样，总是有很多人站着。生物学家似乎喜
欢站在海滩上，彼此讲话，打着手势，弯下腰在沙上划着图形。
到夜幕降临的时候，沙上已横竖交叉着乱七八糟的纵坐标、横坐
标和曲线。那都是为了解释自然界各种事物的。
五十七、对于我们在身体内部进行的那些复杂、协调、奇巧无比
的操作，规则又不同了。我们不需要学任何事情。我们的平滑肌
477细胞生来带有全套指令，一点也不需要我们帮助，而是按自己的
计划一路工作着，调节着血管的口径，把食物移经肠道，根据整
个系统的要求开启或关闭管道；分泌细胞秘密地制造着它们的产
品；心脏收缩；扩张、荷尔蒙被发送出去，跟细胞膜不声不响地
进行反应，使腺苷基环化酶、前列腺素以及其他信号开了又关；
细胞之间靠互相接触彼此进行通讯；细胞器向别的细胞器发出讯
息。所有这些都在不停地进行，我们并没有对它们说什么悄悄话。
整个安排是一个生态系统，其中每一部分的操作都由其他所有部
分的状态和活动制约着。事情通常是顺利地进行，这是一个万无
一失的机制。
五十八、细察之下，最居心叵测的微生物——那些似乎真的希望
我们得病的细菌，倒更象旁观者、流浪汉和偶来避寒的陌生客。
它们一有机会就侵入人体，进行繁衍，有一些会到达我们肌体最
深处的组织，闯入血流。但还是我们对它们的存在作出的反应使
我们得病。
我们身体中用以迎战细菌的火药这样猛烈，又牵涉这样多的防御
机制，它们对我们的危险性比入侵者还要大。我们周身都是爆炸
装置；我们全身布满了地雷。
五十九、用心不错，却带来致命的结局。这个反应机制本身是相
当好的，只要运用得当有度，其对付单个细菌侵入的作用还是大
可赞叹的：它把血细胞召到现场，逐出可凝蛋白，细菌陷入罗网，
478失去活动能力，这事儿就整个儿地了结了。只有当遭遇到大量内
毒素自由分子的信号，让肌体想起了大量弧菌的存在时，鲎才惊
惶失措，一下子使出了自卫的浑身解数，这才把自己毁了。
六十、这种过程基本上是一种对于信号的反应，有点象蓄奴蚁分
泌的外激素，这种外激素在受害蚁群中引起恐慌，导致受害蚂蚁
群落的混乱和瓦解。
我觉得，我们的大多数疾病很可能都是这样得的。有些时候，滥
杀的机制是有免疫作用的，但象鲎的例子中一样，经常是一些更
加远古的记忆。我们因一些信号就把自己撕毁成碎片，我们在这
些信号面前非常脆弱，比在任何食肉兽群面前还脆弱。实际上，
我们在受着自身的五角大楼的摆布。大多数时候是这样。
六十一、如果说，语言处在我们社会存在的核心，把我们聚拢在
一起，用意义的大厦覆蔽着我们。那么，也可以同样有把握地说，
美术和音乐乃是那同一个遗传决定的普遍机制的作用。大家一起
做做这些也算不得坏事。如果因此我们就成了群居性生物，就跟
蚂蚁一样，那么，至少我（或者我应该说至少我们？）是不会介
意的。
六十二、
如果真是这样，这就意味着从某种本质意义上讲，人脑能产生词
类以外的东西也是预先编码的。由于我们认识的属于人类行为的
其他一切都派生于语言这一中心机制，那么，这同一套基因也至
479少间接地制约着这样一些令人惊讶的行为：音乐厅里，几百人挤
在一起，不声不响地、侧着耳朵、若有所思地在听着音乐，好象
在接受什么指令一样；或者，人们在一个画廊里，慢慢往前移动
着脚步，眼盯着画面，无暇旁顾他人，那么全神贯注，好象在读
着什么指令。
六十三、
跟土蜂一样，淋巴细胞由遗传的程序规定的任务是巡察，但它们
每一个似乎都只获准有一个各不相同的意念。它们在组织中漫
游、感觉和监测。由于它们数目太多，所以可以作集体的猜想，
能够觉察到地球表面任何抗原性的东西。但它们干起事来都是一
次只能完成一个意念。它们在体表的感受器里携带着特殊的信
息，表现形式是一个问号：
那边有没有我要找的那种特别的分子构型？生物信息大约是本
质如此吧，它不但把自己象能量一样积累起来，还怂恿大家去找
寻更多的信息。这是一个不知屠足的机制。
六十四、
那边有没有我要找的那种特别的分子构型？生物信息大约是本
质如此吧，它不但把自己象能量一样积累起来，还怂恿大家去找
寻更多的信息。这是一个不知屠足的机制。
淋巴细胞显然熟知它们周围所有的异物，而有些淋巴细胞有着特
480殊的装备，使之适合一些原来并不存在、后来由有机化学家在实
验室里合成出来的聚合物。这些细胞能做的不只是预言现实；它
们显然还有作出大胆设想的程序。
六十五、跟土蜂一样，淋巴细胞由遗传的程序规定的任务是巡察，
但它们每一个似乎都只获准有一个各不相同的意念。它们在组织
中漫游、感觉和监测。由于它们数目太多，所以可以作集体的猜
想，能够觉察到地球表面任何抗原性的东西。但它们干起事来都
是一次只能完成一个意念。它们在体表的感受器里携带着特殊的
信息，表现形式是一个问号：
那边有没有我要找的那种特别的分子构型？生物信息大约是本
质如此吧，它不但把自己象能量一样积累起来，还怂恿大家去找
寻更多的信息。这是一个不知屠足的机制。
六十六、
这种机制要想有用，这些细胞就得准确无误地紧扣要点。任何意
义不清，任何游移不定，都会给这些细胞带来严重的危险，而给
它们的主人带来的危险更大。只要有一点点误差，就要引起一些
反应，邻近的细胞就会被视为异己而卷进反应。有一种理论说，
衰老的过程可能就是由这种误差的累积造成的，是信息质量的逐
渐降低。这个系统容不得半点偏差。
六十七、这种机制要想有用，这些细胞就得准确无误地紧扣要点。
任何意义不清，任何游移不定，都会给这些细胞带来严重的危险，
481而给它们的主人带来的危险更大。只要有一点点误差，就要引起
一些反应，邻近的细胞就会被视为异己而卷进反应。有一种理论
说，衰老的过程可能就是由这种误差的累积造成的，是信息质量
的逐渐降低。这个系统容不得半点偏差。
六十八、有些生物似乎永远不死。它们只是整个儿地消失在自己
的后代当中。单个的细胞就是这样。细胞一个变两个，两个变四
个，如此下去，过一会儿，它自己的最后一点痕迹就消失了。这
不能看作死亡；若撇开变异不论，那么，那些后代仅仅是第一个
细胞，重新活过一遍。粘菌的生活史中有些结束阶段，看起来象
是死亡，但是，那带有柄和子实体的干枯的鼻涕虫，却显然是发
育中的动物的过渡性组织。游来游去的阿米巴状细胞集体地使用
这种机制，来产生更多的细胞。
六十九、人类行为表现的科学，其本质的盲目性还没有被广泛地
意识到。当我们从科学活动中遴选有价值的新东西时，我们也不
断发现，活动时某些部分似乎需要更好的控制、更高的效率，而
其不可预测性则需要减少。我们愿意花得少一些，而更加按部就
班、有条不紊地按期取得投资的效益。华盛顿制订计划的人们试
图在这方面有所作为，产生了一些新的项目，把那里所有的科研
活动都集中组织起来，特别是在生物医学方面。
这事还需要想一想。科学活动进行得顶好的时候，就有某种几乎
不可驾驭的、生物性的机制在起作用。这一点是不应忽视的。
482七十、你作得成城市模型图，但你会知道，这些城市是理性分析
所不能理解的；如果你试图用常识预测未来，事情会搞得比先前
更乱七八糟。这是很有意思的，因为城市是人类最集中地群集的
地方，所有的人都在竭力施加着影响。城市似乎有着自己的生命。
如果我们不能理解城市运行的奥妙，我们就不可能十分深入地了
解整个人类社会。
不过，你还是会认为总会有某种理解的途径。地球上人类的大脑
群集在一起，看起来就象个统一的、活的系统。麻烦之处在于，
信息之流大多是单向的。我们都着迷于尽快地输入信息，但缺乏
多多收回的感觉机制。我承认，我很少感觉到人类的头脑里想的
是什么，还不如我感觉到一只蚂蚁头脑里想的是什么更多些。大
家来想一想吧，这也许会是个很好的出发点。
七十一、
或许，我们只是刚刚开始学着使用这个系统，而作为一个物种，
我们整个的演化过程几乎还都在后头。也许，我们今天产生并在
大脑之间疾速传播的思想，就好象在香港和波士顿的宴会桌上同
时讲着的笑话，就好象我们发式的突然改变，就象今天流行的所
有爱情歌曲。它们不过是日后更复杂的聚合结构的原始阶段，可
以跟生物演化早期漂游在浅水洼里的原核细胞相提并论。后来，
时机适宜的时候，那些片片断断之间出现了融合与共生，那时，
我们就会看到真核的思想，看到思维的后生动物，看到思维彼此
483生长在一起的巨大珊瑚礁。
这样的机制已经存在，并且无疑已经能够发挥作用，尽管迄今为
止的全部产品基本上还是些断片。但不得不说，从演化的角度来
看，我们运用大脑的时候还极其短暂，不过区区几千年，而人类
的历史怕要延续几十亿年。在这几千年中，人类思想一直是斑斑
块块地分散在地球各处。这样的思想交流，或许有某些规律，规
定了它可以有效地运行的临界浓度和质量。只有到了本世纪，我
们才大规模地彼此靠近，才得以在整个地球范围内开始融合，而
从今往后，这一进程可以迅速向前了。
七十二、你可以说，向大气释放氧气是演化的结果。你也可以反
过来说，演化乃是有了氧气的结果。你怎么说都通。一旦光合细
胞——很可能相当于今天的蓝绿藻——出现，未来的地球呼吸机
制就形成了。从前，大气中氧的水平增高到今天氧气浓度的百分
之一时，地球上的厌氧生物便受到了威胁，下一步，不可避免地
要出现带有氧化系统和 atp（三磷酸腺苷）的突变型。有了这些，
我们来到了一个爆炸性发展的阶段，千万种会呼吸的生命，包括
多细胞的生命形式就可以滋生繁衍了。
七十三、病毒，原先被看作是一心一意制造疾病和死亡的主儿，
现在却渐渐现出活动基因的样子。演化的过程仍旧是遥无尽期、
冗长乏味的生物牌局，唯有胜者才能留在桌边继续玩下去，但玩
的规则似乎渐趋灵活了。我们生活在由舞蹈跳荡的病毒组成的阵
484体中，它们象蜜蜂一样，从一个生物窜向另一个生物，从植物跳
到昆虫跳到哺乳动物跳到我又跳回去，也跳到海里，抱着几片这
样的基因组，又拉上几条那样的基因组，移植着 dna 的接穗，象
大型宴会上递菜一样传递着遗传特征。它们也许是一种机制，使
新的、突变型 dna 在我们中间最广泛地流通着。如果真是这样，
那么，我们在医学领域必须如此集中注意的奇怪的病毒性疾病，
就可被看作是意外事故，是哪里出了点疏漏。
七十四、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一
场战斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那
种冷漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很
久就业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成
一块块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们
的形态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮
的实验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其
中较小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小
者控制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不
是火力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必
就令人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
七十五、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，
叶绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养
中，遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一
485些杂种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设
计得非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些
相当卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，
盖过地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
七十六、虽然我们无论如何也是所有群居性动物中最具社会性的
——比蜜蜂更互相依赖，联系更密切，行为上更不可分，我们却
并不经常感到我们的联合智慧。然而，我们也许是被联在一些电
路里，以便贮存、处理、取出信息，因为这似乎是所有人类事务
中最基本、最普遍的活动。我们的生物功能，或许就是建筑某种
丘。我们能够得到整个生物圈中所有的信息，那是以太阳光子流
作为基本单位来到我们这儿的。当我们知道这些东西是怎样克服
了随机性而重新安排成各种东西，比如，弹器、量子力学、后期
四重唱，我们或许对于如何前进会有个更清楚的概念。电路好象
还在，即使并不总是通着电。
科学中使用的通讯系统应能为研究人类社会信息积累机制提供
简洁而易操作的模型。
七十七、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿
鞋的人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔
地，只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类
气味研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合
资建立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的
486问题。这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行
研究的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明
的狗能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许
就得从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素
相对浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的
人们应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们
弄清楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、
能发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者
的另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给
者，等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或
许能成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方
面转移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
七十八、动物也赋有类似的发出信号的机制。成队的蚂蚁在路上
爬行时可嗅出同群和其他蚂蚁的区别。蚂蚁熙熙攘攘过路，留下
踪迹，亲近的蚂蚁可以跟踪，别的蚂蚁就不能。
有些蚂蚁是食肉蚁，生来就具有觉察到它们惯于捉来作奴隶的蚁
类踪迹的本事，跟踪受害者，直到它们的巢穴，释放出特殊的气
味物质，使受害蚁群惊慌溃乱。
鱥鱼和鲶鱼可以通过个体特有的气味辨别出同类中的每一个成
员。很难想象，有一个独居的、独立的、存在主义者鱥鱼，单个
487儿挑出来能被认出；处在群体中的鱥鱼，在行为上象一个动物体
内可以互相替换的相同部件，但个体还是存在。
七十九、把这些原始的机制抛在身后了。我们总爱把嗅球看成是
某种考古学发现，而提到人脑中古老的嗅觉区时，好象它们是些
上年纪的、疯疯癫癫的亲戚，需要有些嗜好。
然而我们的实际情况可能比我们想象的要好一些。普通的人可以
觉察出几个分子的丁基硫醇，而大多数人可以感觉出若有若无的
一点点麝香。甾族化合物有奇异的芳香味儿，它们能发散各种各
样麝香一样的、性感的气味。女人能敏锐地感知一种叫作环十五
内酯的合成甾族化合物的气味，而大多数男人却不能觉察。所有
人都能闻出蚂蚁，而 pismire（蚂蚁）这个大词儿本来就是为这
种气味而杜撰的（pis＝piss：撒尿，mire：蚂蚁）。
八十、不同动物之间用于通讯的嗅觉感受器，对于建立共生系统
来说是至关重要的。蟹和海葵依靠分子构型认出彼此是伙伴，海
葵和跟它共生的少女鱼也是这样。类似的装置还被用于自卫，比
如帽贝，它用来防御食肉的海星的方法是将套膜外翻，使海星失
去一个立足点；帽贝能感觉出一种特别的海星蛋白。公平地说，
所有海星都制造这种蛋白，释放至周围的环境。这种系统显然是
古老的一种，比我们现在为识别彼此而如此倚重的抗体的免疫感
知早得多。最近已知，细胞抗原标记自我的那些基因和那些通过
抗体形成而发生免疫反应的基因有着密切的联系。有可能，抗体
488的创生，来自共生所需的早期感觉机制，这种机制可能部分是用
来避免共生活动失控。
八十一、一切生物，不管是植物还是动物，它们之间进行化学通
讯的非常普遍的系统，被惠特克（whittaker,r.h.）称为
“ allelochemics ”（不同种间化学作用）。每一种生命形式都
用这种或那种信号，对周围的其他生物宣布它在近处，向来犯者
划定界限，或向潜在的共生者散发出欢迎的信号。总的效果，是
形成一种调节生长速度和领土占领的协调机制。这显然是用来使
地球自我平衡的。
八十二、后来，他历历在目地回忆起那段经过。他是那样惊异于
与死亡相联的那不同寻常的安宁、平静和绝无痛楚的感觉。于是
他创造了一种理论，说所有动物都有一种保护性的生理机制，在
死亡的边缘开始起作用，将它们在一团平静的云雾中带到彼岸。
八十三、保护机制遇到障碍，没有开启。
从越来越多的心脏病患者那里，我们有新的机会来了解更多关于
死亡生理学的第一手知识。有些病人经过那整个过程，然后又活
过来。从第一批由心脏病假死中复活的人们那儿了解到的情况来
看（这种假死已被称作拉撒路症候群），奥斯勒似乎说对了，那
些记得那段经过的全部或部分的人们并没有回忆起任何恐惧或
痛苦。有几个人看上去似乎已经死了，但在整个过程中一直清醒
着，他们感觉到一种奇异的超脱感。有一个人发生冠状动脉梗塞，
489在一家医院门前心脏停止了跳动，实际情况说明他已经死了。几
分钟后，他的心脏在电极的刺激下重新起动，又恢复呼吸活了过
来。据他的描述，最奇怪的一件事是，有那么多人围在身旁，那
么急促地来来去去，那么激动地摆弄着他的身体，而他感觉到的
只是平静。
八十四、保护机制遇到障碍，没有开启。
从越来越多的心脏病患者那里，我们有新的机会来了解更多关于
死亡生理学的第一手知识。有些病人经过那整个过程，然后又活
过来。从第一批由心脏病假死中复活的人们那儿了解到的情况来
看（这种假死已被称作拉撒路症候群），奥斯勒似乎说对了，那
些记得那段经过的全部或部分的人们并没有回忆起任何恐惧或
痛苦。有几个人看上去似乎已经死了，但在整个过程中一直清醒
着，他们感觉到一种奇异的超脱感。有一个人发生冠状动脉梗塞，
在一家医院门前心脏停止了跳动，实际情况说明他已经死了。几
分钟后，他的心脏在电极的刺激下重新起动，又恢复呼吸活了过
来。据他的描述，最奇怪的一件事是，有那么多人围在身旁，那
么急促地来来去去，那么激动地摆弄着他的身体，而他感觉到的
只是平静。
八十五、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一
场战斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那
种冷漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很
490久就业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成
一块块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们
的形态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮
的实验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其
中较小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小
者控制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不
是火力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必
就令人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
八十六、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，
叶绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养
中，遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一
些杂种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设
计得非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些
相当卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，
盖过地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
也许，我们会觉得，仅仅出于善意而接纳从其他星体来的别的生
命形式是可能的。
八十七、科学中使用的通讯系统应能为研究人类社会信息积累机
制提供简洁而易操作的模型。
齐曼（ziman,j.m.）在近期《自然》杂志上着文指出， “发明一
种机制，把科学研究工作中获得的片片断断的知识系统地公布于
491世，一定算得上现代科学史上的关键性事件”。
八十八、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿
鞋的人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔
地，只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类
气味研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合
资建立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的
问题。这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行
研究的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明
的狗能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许
就得从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素
相对浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的
人们应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们
弄清楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、
能发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者
的另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给
者，等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或
许能成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方
面转移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
八十九、据称，受过良好训练的猎犬可以准确无误地跟踪一个穿
鞋的人的足迹，即使那个人穿过留下了无数其他人的脚印的开阔
地，只要事先让狗闻一下这人的衣物就行。假如非要为全国人类
492气味研究会（可以用食品药品管理局和联邦通讯委员会的预算合
资建立）想出一项研究与发展计划，这将是一个开创性的极好的
问题。这项计划也许还会产生一些我们愿意看到由联邦资助进行
研究的次级的、分项科研项目。如果真象小说里说的那样，聪明
的狗能通过嗅觉辨出一个人跟其他任何人的差别，那么，这也许
就得从 10 碳原子分子几何形状的不同，或从数种混杂的外激素
相对浓度的不同得到解释。如果这是事实，那么，研究免疫学的
人们应该感兴趣。他们早就象立界桩宣布所有权一样宣称，他们
弄清楚了区别此与非此的各种机制。也许，敏感和精确得出奇的、
能发觉半抗原那样小的分子的免疫机制，代表着发觉同一标记者
的另一种方法。人的最好朋友可被用来嗅辨出组织相容的供给
者，等等。只要我们能成功地将研究活动维持在这一水平，并或
许能成功地通过释放大量的金钱，把每个人的注意力都从其他方
面转移开来，我们可能就不会陷于麻烦。
九十、们没有。有时，为消除这种失落感（或感觉的失落），我
们自我安慰，我们早已在演化过程中把这些原始的机制抛在身后
了。我们总爱把嗅球看成是某种考古学发现，而提到人脑中古老
的嗅觉区时，好象它们是些上年纪的、疯疯癫癫的亲戚，需要有
些嗜好。
九十一、一切生物，不管是植物还是动物，它们之间进行化学通
讯的非常普遍的系统，被惠特克（whittaker,r.h.）称为
“ allelochemics ”（不同种间化学作用）。每一种生命形式都
493用这种或那种信号，对周围的其他生物宣布它在近处，向来犯者
划定界限，或向潜在的共生者散发出欢迎的信号。总的效果，是
形成一种调节生长速度和领土占领的协调机制。这显然是用来使
地球自我平衡的。
九十二、后来，他历历在目地回忆起那段经过。他是那样惊异于
与死亡相联的那不同寻常的安宁、平静和绝无痛楚的感觉。于是
他创造了一种理论，说所有动物都有一种保护性的生理机制，在
死亡的边缘开始起作用，将它们在一团平静的云雾中带到彼岸。
九十三、我只有一次见过死亡的痛苦，那是在一个狂犬病患者身
上。长达二十四小时之内，他极其清楚地知道他自身解体过程的
每一步，直到最后一息。在狂犬病人的特别神经病理学中，好象
保护机制遇到障碍，没有开启
九十四、竟然想到死亡这件事没有什么不好，我自己都觉得吃惊。
但也许不该吃惊。死亡毕竟是一种最古老、最基本的生物机能，
它所形成的机制同样注意入微，是有利于保持生物特性的遗传的
信息来指引生物通过死亡的每一步，象我们司空见惯的生命的所
有其他关键活动一样。
但即使如此，如果在开始的、局部的阶段，这种转化是协调的、
整体和谐的生理过程，仍然有一事尚待解释，那就是意识的永久
消失。我们还得永远困惑于这个问题吗？
494九十五、那意识到底跑哪去了？莫非它只是立时倒毙，失落在腐
殖质里，变成废物了？考虑到大自然有为复杂难解的机制派上用
场的趋势，意识消失这事在我看来是不自然的。我宁愿认为，它
不知怎的跟它所悬附的细丝分开，然后象轻吸一口气一样缩回到
它所从来的膜里，成为生物圈神经系统的一点新的记忆，然而我
没有任何资料证实这件事。
九十六、沃森（watson,j.a.l）、内尔（nel,j.j.c.）和休伊特
（hewitt,p.h.）三人曾经从野外收集到大量白蚁，把它们放在
一起，有的成群，有的成对，进行观察。放在一群的白蚁变得越
来越友好而好动，但没有表示产卵或交配的意向；相反，它们缩
减摄水量，注意减肥，其飞行肌肉的线粒体代谢活动增快。被聚
集成群的白蚁不断地用触角互相接触，而这似乎是中心的控制机
制。重要的是被触而不是去触动。去掉触角，任何白蚁仍可成为
群体中的白蚁，只要足够频繁地被其他白蚁接触。
九十七、病毒，原先被看作是一心一意制造疾病和死亡的主儿，
现在却渐渐现出活动基因的样子。演化的过程仍旧是遥无尽期、
冗长乏味的生物牌局，唯有胜者才能留在桌边继续玩下去，但玩
的规则似乎渐趋灵活了。我们生活在由舞蹈跳荡的病毒组成的阵
体中，它们象蜜蜂一样，从一个生物窜向另一个生物，从植物跳
到昆虫跳到哺乳动物跳到我又跳回去，也跳到海里，抱着几片这
样的基因组，又拉上几条那样的基因组，移植着 dna 的接穗，象
495大型宴会上递菜一样传递着遗传特征。它们也许是一种机制，使
新的、突变型 dna 在我们中间最广泛地流通着。如果真是这样，
那么，我们在医学领域必须如此集中注意的奇怪的病毒性疾病，
就可被看作是意外事故，是哪里出了点疏漏。
九十八、甚至在情况要求有赢有输的时候，这种交易也未必是一
场战斗。海生腔肠动物门海扇的几个种的成员彼此之间表现的那
种冷漠态度表明，保持个性的机制一定在演化出免疫机制之前很
久就业已存在了。海扇们长起来总是密密丛丛地挤在一起，长成
一块块枝状的东西，但它们并不彼此融合。假如融合了，那它们
的形态无疑将乱成一团。西奥多（theodor,j.l.）在一系列漂亮
的实验中表明，当将两个同种的个体放在一起、密切接触时，其
中较小的一个总是先行解体。这种自我毁灭来自一种完全由较小
者控制的裂解机制。它没有被摔出场外，没有被以力战胜，也不
是火力不敌，它只是自愿退场。知道生物界还有这样的事，未必
就令人安慰，但至少让人吃惊之余会觉得舒舒服服。
九十九、大气中的氧，是植物中的叶绿体产生的（让人惊讶的是，
叶绿体也生活在巨蛤和更低级的海洋生物的吸管里）。组织培养
中，遗传上毫无联系的细胞聚到一起，无视种的不同，融合成一
些杂种细胞，这乃是一种自然的趋势。炎症和免疫机制实在得设
计得非常强大，才得以把我们这些生物彼此分开。如果没有这些
相当卖力的机制，我们或许早已演化成一种到处流动的合胞体，
盖过地球，那么，大地上就连一朵花都不会生发出来了。
496也许，我们会觉得，仅仅出于善意而接纳从其他星体来的别的生
命形式是可能的。
我们这个星球毕竟是在雨水里含有维生素 b12 的星球！据帕克
（parker,b.c.）的计算，当农田耕作时，对流的风暴把 b12 从
土壤带到大气上层，它在雨水中的含量已足够使偌大的水塘中开
出一朵可见的裸藻花，
科学中使用的通讯系统应能为研究人类社会信息积累机制
提供简洁而易操作的模型。
齐曼（ziman,j.m.）在近期《自然》杂志上着文指出， “发
明一种机制，把科学研究工作中获得的片片断断的知识系统地公
布于世，一定算得上现代科学史上的关键性事件”。】
最后，谨对托马斯论《机制》和美国科学院院士刘易斯.托
马斯医学大师对人类的巨大贡献表示诚挚的感谢！永恒地谢谢、
谢谢！……
赵大庆 强燕平
2024 年 1 月 1 日
重要参考书目
《自然与希腊人科学与人文主义》埃尔温·薛定谔著
张卜天译 商务印书馆 2015 年 2 月
497498
《生命是什么》埃尔温·薛定谔著（罗来欧 罗辽复
译）湖南科学技术出版社，2003 年
《物种起源》达尔文 商务印书馆 1995 年 5 月
《给你创新的支点》强燕平编著
科学普及出版社
2003 年
《寂静的春天》蕾切尔·卡森著 吕瑞兰 李长生绎
吉林人民出版社 1997 年
《科学发纵横现谈》
王梓坤著
上海人民出版社
1978 年
《科学简史-从科学仪器的发展看科学科学的历史》
托马斯·克拉普著 （朱润生译）中国青年出版社
2005 年
《原创技术发明方法
自主创新源泉》 赵大庆
强
燕平著 华夏出版社 2006 年
《一个系统林奈的激情和自然秩序的梦》HELEN
SCHMITZ NILS UDDENBERG NATUR KULTUR 2007 年
《霍金的宇宙》 戴维·费尔津著
赵复垣绎 海南
出版社 2000 年
《天体运行论》尼古拉·哥白尼著 （叶式辉译）武
汉出版社 1992 年
《十问 霍金沉思录》史蒂芬.霍金著 湖南科技出版
社 2019 年《人为何是人》日 咗腾方彦编著 北京大学出版社
1990 年 12 月
《人是机器》法 拉.梅特里 商务印书馆 1959 年 8 月
《定位》美 艾.里斯 杰克.特劳特 机械工业出版社
2016 年 10 月
《工具论》古希腊亚里士多德著广东人民出版社
1984 年 3 月
《宇宙之谜》流耀泽编 内蒙古人民出版社 2007 年 6
月
《疾病的希望》德 托.德特勒夫森吕.达尔克著 春风
文艺出版社 1999 年 9 月
《天文学简史》法 伏古勒尔著 上海科学技术出版社
1959 年 12 月
《细胞生命的礼赞》刘易斯.托马斯 湖南科学技术出
版社 1998 年 12 月
499《整体板块遗传律》英文版：
Most esteemed Committee of the Nobel Prize in Physiology
or Medicine Karolinska Institutet:
Your Excellency Ladies and Gentlemen,
Hello!
On April 18, 2024, five works of Holistic Life Science
were sent. address: (P.O.OX 5232,SE-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden
Street address: Sturegatan 14, Stockholm Tel: +46 (0)8 663
09 20
Human scientific knowledge is first of all the great
glory created by civilian scientists - the continuation of
the miracle of ancient Greek scientific knowledge, the four
pagans Copernicus, Galileo, Harvey, Bruno completed the
"Theory of Celestial Bodies", "Dialogue on the two world
systems of Ptolemy and Copernicus", "The Theory of Blood
Movement" scientific Canon; They are all civilian members
of the rebellious church, for which Bruno gave his precious
life and laid the foundation for the rapid and unusually high
speed breakthrough and development of human scientific
knowledge, especially in the West...
The world's greatest Nobel science giant to all mankind
left the "Nobel Prize" scientific frontier guiding light -
Nobel in 1895, highlighting the great miracle of civilian
scientists, will forever set up the Nobel Prize in the world,
rewarding the global "natural person" with outstanding
scientific contributions.
Before and after the awards, The most famous citizen
scientists are Michael Faraday, Jacob Berzelius, one of the
founders of modern chemistry, Niccolo Fontana, and James
Kroll, the founder of astroclimatology Croll, Maurice
Hilleman, the "father of modern vaccines," and so on... The
great creative genes of the common people are in the blood.
In the 129 years since the Nobel Prize was established in
1895, only Tu Youyou, the "three non-scientists", won the
Nobel Prize in 2015. It is a historical pity that no real
civilian scientist has ever won the Nobel Prize. ...
The Nobel Prize won by civilian scientists is the
historical trend and great symbol of the popularity of theNobel Prize in science in the 21st century, the inevitable
fruit of the global popularity of the Nobel Prize, and the
original intention and fervor of the design of science awards
before the Nobel science giant! ...
Let us realize the original intention of real civilian
scientists to win the Nobel Prize, forever cherish and
comfort the noble and great gods of the Nobel scientific
giants, and use the Nobel Prize to create the supreme glory
of new scientific knowledge and the miracle of AI for all
mankind!
Oh my God! Nobel Prize with God (93.27% of Nobel Prize
winners believe in God)!
Aaargh! Great Nobel Prize spirits! ...
With regards
salute
Strong swallow flat knock an
Beijing, May 10, 2024. Yanjiao
最尊敬的诺贝尔生理学或医学奖委员会卡罗林斯卡学院：
最尊敬的阁下女士、先生们：
您好！
2024 年 4 月 18 日寄去整体生命学五著作。地址：（P.O.Box
5232,SE-102 45 Stockholm, Sweden Street address: Sturegatan
14, Stockholm 电话: +46 (0)8 663 09 20
）人类科学知识首先是平民科学家创造的伟大辉煌-延续古希
腊科学知识奇迹、四异教徒哥白尼、伽利略、哈维、布鲁诺完成
《天体运行论》、《关于托勒密和哥白尼两大世界体系的对话》、《心
血运动论》科学元典；他们都是反叛教会的平民教徒，为此布鲁
诺献出宝贵生命，才奠定了人类科学知识特别是西方迅猛异常地
高速度突破与发展……
世界最伟大的诺贝尔科学巨擘给全人类留下“诺贝尔奖”科
学前沿指路明灯-诺贝尔 1895 年，彰显平民科学家伟大奇迹，遗
嘱在全世界永远设立诺贝尔奖项，奖励有科学突出贡献的全球“自
然人”。
设奖前后，平民科学家最著名有迈克尔·法拉第（Michael
Faraday）、雅各布·贝采利乌斯（Jacob Berzelius）是现代化学
的创始人之一、尼科洛·丰坦纳（Niccolò Fontana、天文气候学
的奠基人詹姆斯·克罗尔（James Croll）、“现代疫苗之父”莫里
斯·希勒曼（Maurice Hilleman）等等……血液都流淌字平民的伟大创造基因。诺贝尔奖 1895 年设立至今 129 年，只有“三无科
学家”屠呦呦 2015 年获得诺贝尔奖；尚没有一个地地道道的平民
科学家获诺贝尔奖，这是一个历史遗憾！……
平民科学家获得诺贝尔奖是 21 世纪科学诺奖深入人心的历史
大趋势和伟大标志，是诺贝尔奖全球普及必然圣果，同样是诺贝
尔科学巨擘生前设计科学奖项初心与殷切希望！……
让我们实现真正平民科学家获得诺贝尔奖初衷，永远缅怀、
告慰诺贝尔科学巨擘高贵伟大神灵，并用诺贝尔奖创造全人类新
科学知识与 AI 奇迹至高无上的辉煌吧！
上帝啊！诺贝尔奖与上帝同在（诺贝尔奖获得者中 93.27％相
信上帝神灵）！
啊！伟大的诺贝尔奖神灵吆！……
此致
敬礼
强燕平叩安
2024 年 5 月 10 日北京.燕郊
附：《整体板块遗传律》英文版
Attached: The Law of Integral Plate Genetics in English
Basic theory of holistic life science Ⅰ
The law of global Plate heredity: Big Bang global Life
By Zhao Daqing, Qiang and Yanpi
From this book:
Dedicated to the human medical biology science to return to
nature stubborn protection of the ecological natural environment and
fight against the new "biological hazards" never-ending game people!
Express one's thanks
With infinite respect, piety and admiration, we say thank you to
every scientist and friend who has helped us: Thank you! Thank you!
Thank you! Thank you, thank you, thank you!
If it had not been for the full support and cooperation of teacher
Fan Huimin and Dr. Zhao Daqing's "Encounter becomes Gold", there
would not have been the birth of the theory of "whole life" in
Qinghua Garden; Without this kind of team spirit, it would be difficult
to complete the "Law of Whole body plate heredity", "species
restriction mechanism", "Law of human natural selection" and
"Principle of Microecological Variation". In this regard, we take theopportunity of the publication of this book to pay tribute to the
heroes and fathers who fought hard and gave their precious lives in
the fight against the epidemic... Deep feeling authentic sincere thanks
and eternal admiration!
Dear friends! Let us express our heartfelt thanks to you from the
bottom of our hearts. Thank you! Thank you! Thank you! ...
Inscription:
According to Qiang Yanping's holistic biology: The Big Bang itself
is a huge super life, the birth of a highly ordered universe life, the
expansion and contraction of the universe gradually formed a
self-consistent cell in the earth's tiny universe, carrying tens of billions
of people, just gathered Earth cells of microorganisms in the
membrane ten billion years of evolution of atoms - 400 BC ancient
Greek philosopher Plato said early, "The Earth is one big living
organism." In the late 1960s, British atmospheric scientist James E.
Lovelock proposed and jointly launched the "Gaia hypothesis" test
with American biologist Lynn Margulis to prove that life on Earth and
the environment are self-consistent, and in the 1980s, American
Academy of Sciences academician Lewis. Thomas emphasized that
"life on Earth is, in fact, the toughest membrane imaginable in the
universe" and went on to say that "we are all ultimately derived from
a single cell." This cell was brought to life by a burst of electricity as
the Earth cooled. It was from this mother cell that we became what
we are today. We still share genes with the life around us, and the
similarity between the enzyme of the grass and the enzyme of the
whale is the similarity of the same species."17 Big Bang super Rate
energy release equation -Q-J equation 160
The eighteen Big Bang theory of the universe is Mendel's "3:1"
mathematical inverse of the law of gravitation
Ratio 161
Nineteen cosmic Big Bang Force CNC evolutionary traces and
Sphinx "slimming" traces of modern deciphered 162
Twenty "Put a grain of sand on the tip of your finger at arm's
length" confirmed by a color photograph of the singularity 13 billion
years ago
The Big Bang 163Chapter 17 Bunsen's discovery of the galaxy's "sphere negative
entropy" all-weather microlife ecological "channel" is a subtle proof
of the ubiquity of the Big Bang
Now the modern generation of everyone one by one day laptop
water human human Zhen Town hair found various monster is now
able to disease disease... 116666
Two modern studies have revealed the origin of
methyl-methyl-mercuric acid in mercury == salt hydrochloric acid ++
recorded compounds ++ fine bacteria in silt mud greatly
Blasting explosion deceit in secretive secret of "" notebook living
all the way way" ": : + + recorded its chemical compound sulfur acid
sulfate + + fine bacteria bacterium... 116666
Outbreaks of tri - dioxin pollution are everywhere
Four cat - mouse - bee - grass - cow - human ecological universe
Big Bang "negative entropy" cycle diagram
167
The Five-Five-part Nativity discovery of the present cosmic
explosion explosion "" negative entropy and entropy in the sphere
domain" "all day long weather life life slightly born ecology" "all
through the road" "
167
The six "Bunsen channels" are hidden throughout the Big Bang
biology and Earth stars
Tie all corners 168
The quantum properties of the Big Bang life channel and the
"half-strain drift" of sex genes
169
Chapter 18, modern science master Schrodinger's greatest
contribution to the quantum properties of the whole life science of
the Big Bang
Schrodinger integrated physics and life science to create and
return to the classical quantum property of Big Bang whole life
science "life lives on negative entropy" 171
What Is Life? Microscopic species-invariant theory of conclusive
quantum mechanics of life 171
The three genetic mechanisms are closely related to quantum
theory and even built on quantum theory Genetic mechanisms have
long entered the whole life structure of the Big BangFour genetic mechanisms! Heredity is the process of selection for
the elimination of individuals of unviable species, and it is the
wholeness of life that is achieved by the reproduction (typing) of the
strong individuals within the species
Chapter 19 The instinct of the "genetic mechanism" of the six
realms of modern man comes from the everlasting "species" of the
whole life science of the Big Bang
A modern scientist named Linnaeus left a gap in the classification
of microorganisms 178
Two modern scientists have found in the greenstone belt some
3.77 billion to 4.28 billion years old
Fossil bacteria 178
Three "specific restriction mechanisms" led the scientist Pasteur
to find that the bacterial silkworm disease "pepper powder" was the
first bacteria to be the source of infection 179
Four modern scientists' Koch Criteria proved for the first time
that a specific microbe was the cause of a specific disease
Five modern scientists, Japanese biologist Yasuwatanabe, found
microbial "free-floating DNA.
Ring "180
Modern American biologist Copperland set up a "fungal world"
181
The modern scientist Weitheke classified the "prokaryotic realm"
into the "five realms" 181
Eight modern virus discoveries 181
Nine modern humans have found that the simple properties of
the genetic material in the outer protein shell of the virus do not
belong to the "five realms" and there is a "biological six realms
classification system" 182
In the thirteenth year, the virus caused more damage to modern
humans than ever before
Eleven eleven Why is it that the 66th biota generally follows the
"Kokohehe criteria" and never exceeds.... 118833
In the year 123,000, the virus has done more harm to humans
than ever before - viruses have changed in every way
And strictly follow the "Koch Guidelines" ② 184
For more than 13, 000 years, countless viruses have harmed
human beings and caused great disasters, but every major plaguevirus demonstrates the "law of mysterious disappearance" 186
14 Solar magnetic storm cycle makes the virus "mysterious
disappearance" highlighting the everlasting imprint of the Big Bang on
life and proof 188
Chapter 20 "The Big Bang" The Force reveals the origin of the
"whole biology"
The attributive nature of the whole life of the universe is
inseparable from the big and small cosmic system: :.... 119900
Cosmological principles are closely related to the origin of
human life as a whole
The life blueprint of three generations of DNA transmission
implies that the cycle of life and death cannot be ended 192
The Nature of the Expanding Universe by Stephen Hawking and
Asteroid Threat 192
Five quantum fluctuations of the universe and the seed of life
"point" - fertilized egg 193
The holistic God of life in the six universes is indeed rolling the
dice (Einstein was wrong)
The King of Infinite Space in the Seven Universes The Future of
the Greatest Treatise The Big Bang of the Greeks. 193
Viii Expansion and End of Life in the Universe 194
How big is the Big Bang? 194
Ten Big Bang domains "Weber" is seen 7,600 light years from
Earth 196
Chapter 21: Ecological entropy Principle of the whole life of the
Big Bang
A big Bang produced a lot of Force energy, and it also produced
an equal amount of negative energy in the Earth galaxy left behind by
mysterious stealth 199
. "" life life to negative entropy for living" negative entropy "...
119999
Three Schrodinger "negative entropy" summarizes the origin of
Fabre's ecological entropy in the Big Bang
200
Four Maier modern scientists found that the ecological entropy
changes with the earth's latitude entropy principle 201
Five people in April, mountain temple peach blossom 201
Six applied quantum mechanics to quantitatively analyze entropyfrom the Big Bang 202
The seven "ecological entropy" galactic motivations arise from
the overall "entropy" of the Big Bang force without interruption
Sustained expansion and retention 203
Chapter 22, "Fossil" is the whole life science of the Big Bang The
origin of life of the Earth's biological rings "time window" artificial
fake fossil chain must be completely eliminated
The whole life theory of the Big Bang upends science from
ancient Greece 3,000 years ago
Fossil Theory 204
The artificial nature of the Earth's fossil chain deviates from the
whole life of the Big Bang 205
Three niche "fossil chain" does not have any trace of the Big
Bang overall life science is completely artificial "fossil chain" 207
There are too many "fossil chains" based on faulty Darwinian
theory of evolution
Human imagination unscientific trace 208
V. Darwin's theory of evolution completely deviates from the
Ediacara-Chengjiang-Burgess 3 fauna (s
Global mutational evolution between fossils 208
The six-niche artificial bubble of the second stage fossil chain is
not at all Linnaeus' natural system.209
The seven-niche artificial third stage fossil chain is completely
devoid of fossil natural systems.209
Eighty-five thousand years of paleontology will never find
Haeckel's "ape-man" 210
Nine mysterious "walnut clamp people" can not change the
whole life suddenly burst "discontinuous flat"
Mutagenesis 210
Ten Leakey's "East African" can become "Australopithecus
Baumi" and Leakey's fossils can thus be changed and falsified 211
Eleven hundred years of anthropologists in the map of the "ape
man" to the number (four stages)
Xley's "Man is changed by a monkey" 211
The beginning and end of the twelve modern Piltdown fossil
shocking fraud case 212
Thirteen Dubois pieced together a fake "Homo erectus" scandal
213Fourteen flawed "fossil bones" and "Lucy" do not prove that
"man is a monkey" 213
Fifteen years after Piltdown the fossil fraud scandal expanded in
global archaeology 214
Xvi In 1975, the ancient tomb site of the Afa fossil dream broken
214
17 Darwinian Theory of evolution "from Ape to man" Source of
fraud 215
Xviii Darwin's Origin of Species contains too many "speculations"
+ too many ambiguous statements of possibilities and possibilities
aimed at replacing the concept of the ape
Nineteen Darwinian evolution uses the sophistry of five facts to
produce three inferences to establish a "from
Ape to Man "The Great Con of the Century 217
Twenty Darwin promoted Haeckel's "law of reenactment" into a
niche "four-stage" fake fossil chain "from
Ape to man "centuries-old dream no talk of evolution 218
Chapter 23: The "Prehistoric Civilization" left by the Big Bang
highlights the nightmare of Darwin's evolution
A real "prehistoric civilization" 223
2 billion years of large nuclear reactors and 2.8 billion years of
prehistoric remains 223
355 million year weapon to 260,000 year iron spear 223
Four Greeks Plato's Dialogues of the ten thousand year wonder
of the "Atlantis" empire
224
Chapter 24: Modern man discovers the "Force" of the Big Bang
explosion in the galaxy, universe and Earth all things in the "atomic"
core contains a shocking secret
In 3,000 years, the ancient Greeks predicted the existence of 225
atoms in all things
Two modern scientists Bohr atomic model 225
Three modern Bohr and three generations of teachers and
students have opened the secret of the atomic core 226
Four Modern scientist Joseph Thomson discovers the plum
pudding model - revealing the first layer of atomic veil 226
Five modern scientists Rutherford's alchemical model went deep
into the nucleus 226Modern scientist Rutherford found from the energy rays and
"decay" inside atoms that atoms can continue to be broken down
Seven modern scientists Rutherford found from energy rays
inside atoms and "decay" that atoms can continue to be torn down
Eight modern scientists miss the discovery of the neutron but
miss the Nobel Prize 228
Nine modern people found that the neutron had a mentor
(fulcrum) story Scientific discovery is a process of mentor inheritance;
The ancient Greek city-state science innovation technology "master
apprentice" was born the Italian Renaissance three masters: Da. Vinci,
Michelangelo, Raphael! 228
Ten modern scientists Little Curie and his wife discovered the Big
Bang "chain reaction" 229
Eleven modern scientist Lawrence "Cyclotron" competed for the
1939 Nobel Prize 229
Twelve modern scientists Fermi pioneered the world's first
controlled nuclear fission chain reactor to uncover the Big Bang
"Force" hidden within the Big Bang Force 230
13 August 2, 1939 Einstein to Roosevelt - The Big Bang (Hell)
This is how the fire opens 230
14 Einstein regrets opening the "Promethean Fire" 231
Fifteen modern goddesses Meitner and Hahn opened the
"Hellfire" side door to peep at the universe's Big Bang "Force"
shocking burst terrifying face 232
Sixteen Lizer Meitner is the best in the world and the first theory
explained by Otto Ha
The woman scientist who discovered nuclear fission in 1938;
Opened the "Hellfire" side gate for humanity
Seventeen modern scientists Meitner prophesied the artificial
solar fusion 233
Eighteen major breakthroughs The United States completed
nuclear fusion positive energy to reveal the origin of the Big Bang star
solar system energy 234
When Hawking was about to leave the human race, he looked up
to the heavens and asked, "We can survive on Earth.
Is it?" 236
Twenty Hawking did not hurry to see the Russian-Ukrainian war
detonated a nuclear war to destroy the world human beings close athand to leave us forever 237
Epilogue 239
Appendix: Thomas on "Mechanisms" 243
Important bibliography 265
preface
When I was young, my mother always asked me, "Chicken came
first?" "Or did the egg come first?" ... I said the egg came first! Mother
always smiles without answering; Until I grew up, went to primary
school, middle school, junior college, my mother always asked this old
question. I said chicken first! Or the egg came first! ? Mom was always
having fun too... I don't know how happy Mom is! ? -- Childlike
innocence! In this way, with the mother's eternal smile left us, but we
and our children and grandchildren always do not know the world
first egg or chicken! ?
Later, there was a bigger question obsessed with humanity: Did
the universe have a "singularity" first? Or did the Big Bang come first
13.8 billion years ago? It's almost the same question Mom asked us all
our lives. No answer? ! ... As a result, there is this great work that will
change the 5000 years of scientific history of mankind. Perhaps it is a
book that is bound to defy Margaret Thatcher's prediction that China
will not influence the world. Or this is a unique methodology of
"post-relativistic" epistemology that the pyramid of human science
will never reach the peak, and this should be a brief history of science
that integrates 13.8 billion years of the Big Bang with all the
categories, disciplines, time and space in the world.
In 1867, however, Darwin's hundreds of thousands of words in
"On the Origin of Species" failed to clarify the question our mothers
asked when we were children: "Did chickens come first?" "Or did the
egg come first?" ! ? It can be seen that the Origin of Species should be
the longest lasting hoax in the world! Because Darwin connected the
world's "chicken first?" "Or did the egg come first?" If you don't
understand, how can you talk about evolution? Nothing but wishful
thinking! ... One day, we suddenly discovered that humanity had
inadvertently left out Schrodinger's most famous "nature"
groundbreaking work, Nature and Greek Science and Humanism
(Hillman lectures at University College London, 24, 26, 28 and 31 May1949). In the first chapter, Schrodinger opens with the question: "Why
return to ancient thought?" (This is a difficult question that millions of
scientists want to ask.) Schrodinger put it this way: I do not think that
we should generally be too surprised to find occasionally in the
earliest records of man's thinking about the world very deep
philosophical ideas, ideas that we today require a great deal of effort
and abstraction to form and grasp. It may be said that this infancy of
human thought was (metaphorically) "closer to nature." The rational
picture of the world has not yet been obtained, the "real world
around us" has not yet been constructed, and at any rate we do find
many examples of this early profound thought in the ancient religious
writings of many peoples, such as the Indians, the Jews, and the
Persians. In comparing these early profound thoughts, I cannot help
thinking of a quote by P.Deussen, the great Sanskrit and witty
philosopher: "It is a great pity that children cannot speak in the first
two years of their lives; otherwise, they might be talking about
Conderje." - Here, Schrodinger puts humanityThe towns of Croton,
Sybaris and Tarentum are located around the bay between the "heel"
and the "toe" of the peninsula. The adherents of this school are very
much like a religious group, requiring odd rituals when eating or doing
other things, and keeping secrets, at least about the teachings, to
outsiders. The founder of the school, Pythagoras, active in the second
half of the 6th century BC, must have been one of the most
extraordinary figures of antiquity. There are many legends about his
supernatural powers: he can remember 35 past lives in the process of
reincarnation (relocation of souls); Someone accidentally turned over
his clothes and found that his thighs were solid gold. He seems to
have left no writings. As evidenced by the well-known phrase
"teacher's Day," for his students his words were the rules that could
settle any argument among them and ultimately determine the
inerrant truth. It is said that students were so awed by his first name
that they called him "yonder man." However, because of the above
characteristics and attitudes of this group, it is sometimes not easy to
determine whether a particular doctrine can be traced back to him or
originated from him.
The Pythagorean school deeply influenced Plato and his
Academy, which clearly inherited the empiricist views of this southern
Italian school. In fact, from the point of view of the history of thought,we might call this Athenian school a branch of the Pythagorean
School. It does not matter that the Platonists did not formally adhere
to the "code," much less that they were eager to disguise rather than
emphasize their dependence in order to promote their originality. Our
information about the Pythagoreans comes chiefly from the faithful
and honest accounts of Aristotle. Aristotle, however, largely disagreed
with them and accused them of an unfounded, empiricist bias that he
himself could easily have held.
We know that the basic doctrine of the Pythagoreans is that "all
things are numbers," although some have tried to weaken this
epigram by saying that "all things are like numbers," that is, similar to
numbers. It is not clear what this assertion really means. This bold
generalization of far-reaching significance probably stems from
Pythagoras' famous discovery that, if composed in harmony with the
intervals produced by the integer part or the rational part of the
string 36 lengths (such as 1/2,2/3,3/4), it may move us to tears, as if
speaking directly to our souls. (The Pythagoreans have a beautiful
metaphor about the relationship between the soul and the body,
probably from Philolaus: the soul is called the harmony of the body,
and the soul is to the body what a musical instrument is to the sound
it produces.)
According to Aristotle, "things" (i.e., numbers) are, above all,
sensible objects. For example, after Empedocles proposed the theory
of four roots, four roots also "became" numbers; But "things" like
spirits, justice, and chance also have their numbers, or are their
numbers. The distribution of numbers is related to some simple
properties of number theory. For example, the square number
(4,9,16,25,...) Relates to justice, and in particular, justice is equal to
the first number 4. The idea behind this must be that the number four
can be divided into two equal factors (as compared to "equity",
"equitable", etc.). A square number of points can be arranged in a
square, as is the case in Ninepins. The Pythagoreans also spoke of
triangular numbers in the same way, such as 3,6,10,... 】 In view of
this, Schrodinger's analysis of the Pythagorean school went all the
way to Plato, Aristotle, Ptolemy... The origin of natural science in
ancient Greece is summarized as follows: "In any case, the
Pythagoreans, by virtue of their prejudices and their preconceived
notions of beauty and simplicity, made more progress in theimportant direction of understanding the structure of the universe
than did the sober Ionian 'natural philosophers' and their spiritual
successors, the atomists, of whom we shall speak at once." (Page 39
of this book) - this is completely 2,200 years later, 1609-1619 Kepler's
three planetary laws of the universe "everything is number" cosmic
harmony has been proved through the ages - history is remembered
by Schrodinger's "Nature and Greek science and Humanism", she
answered our human "why go back to ancient thought", The ancient
Greece developed from the Pythagorean School in 600 BC to the
"Plato Academy" in 387 BC... It is! Schrodinger and modern western
scientists have unanimously confirmed that ancient Greece is the only
origin of human natural science, and no other country or region that
is not influenced by ancient Greek humanism is enough to give birth
to modern science alone!
Then, how did Schrodinger's system explain the science
dominated by the Pythagorean school and the cosmic harmony of
"everything is number" in the universe come into being? ? And how
to produce Plato's "cave theory" and Kant's agnosticism? It also
emphasizes the "atomism" of the universe by Democritus, although
the atomistic view may come from "dilution and condensation"...
Heraclitus's theory: Since all knowledge is based on the senses, these
senses must have the same value a priori, whether they occur in
waking, dreaming, or hallucination; Schrodinger went deep and
explained: "We do not belong to the material world that science has
constructed for us, we are not in it but outside it..." Everything here is
implicit in the wonder of Schrodinger's creation of "wave mechanics"
in 1926 - the announcement of the 2022 Nobel Prize in physics,
Alain Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger were awarded
the prize in recognition of their experiments on entangled photons
that demonstrated the "Einstein error" violation of Bell's inequality
and groundbreaking quantum information science.
Ptolemy developed the principle of scientific simplicity: "It is still
the right way to explain phenomena by the simplest hypothesis which
can unite the facts." The early study of the Greeks is the motto of
modern scientific development, Ptolemy integrated the Pythagorean
school of "all things are number" the origin of the universe, and
created the "point" [post-relativistic methodology] the true
representation and initial insight of the application of the quantumentanglement properties of the universe, planets and everything! ...
Finally, let us with infinite admiration for the world's greatest
physicist, Schrodinger science
The giants left the scientific frontiers of "wave mechanics" and
the magical "quantum entanglement" to mankind... Express the most
sincere respect and heartfelt thanks! Thank you! And let us, with
great piety, Follow the great path of "Nature and Greek Science and
Humanism" into all aspects of the real historical records of the
"childhood" of ancient Greek natural science, and seriously study a
5000 years of worldwide rewriting of materialism's quantum
entanglement of matter and consciousness, body and body The
classic history of the unity of the soul and the broken pieces of
knowledge are systematically publicized to the world, and let's
practice a great declaration of the whole life science of the Big Bang
of the century!
Zhao Daqing strong Yanping
First draft, 1 November 2004
January 21, 2023
Chapter I History of Natural science "Post-relativity" The origin of
ancient Greek epistemology and human natural science (childhood)
The Greeks initially built the pyramid of natural science brilliant has
become the first cornerstone of modern natural science for all
mankind
Inscription: What is the integral block genetic law?
Following the example of Leibniz easy 0 and 1, the world's first
computer was created to encode the Marshall gene code table like
easy 0 and 1, and found that the code interspersed corresponding to
the change of gene mathematics is not linear mathematical
integration, presenting the N-dimensional three-dimensional integral
block operation mode of four modules, eight forms and 16
components of the module, which is called the genetic law of the
gene integral block (the back cover table is the post-relativistic
cognition).
First, Ptolemy created the "point to point" to uncover the originof quantum entanglement of planets in the Big Bang
Relativity "epistemology
The miracle of frontier development of human science appeared
in the ancient Greek Aegean Sea, she is the cradle of ancient Greek
civilization, and the 5000 years of human civilization is exactly the
sacred fruit of ancient Greek civilization that has continued to modern
times. Human beings have no origin, no evolution, and no deceptive
"from ape to man"! "Modern man" is originally the descendants of
the ancient Greeks, after 5,000 years, especially the ancient Greek
science and highly civilized, superior development of 5,000 years to
date, the annals confirm: The Cretan civilization led the whole
European civilization, the Homer Epic in 1200 BC was a cruel symbol
of the glory of the ancient Greek era, the Greeks created their own
characters with Phoenician letters, and the Greeks held the first
Olympic Games in 776 BC to highlight the bodybuilding movement;
The Greek-Persian Wars culminated in the development of ancient
Greece and began to mysteriously disappear! The rapid rise of
Macedonia, the revival of Alexander's Empire and the invasion of
Roman legions in the 5th century played the elegiac song of ancient
Greek civilization, but the Romans continued the essence of ancient
Greek civilization. The rise of Athens, followed by Spain as the most
powerful city-state, the fall of the Romani sultanate in 1299 in the
13th century, the declaration of independence by Ottoman I, and the
creation of a multi-ethnic Ottoman empire named after its founder
(and the dissolution of the Ottoman Empire after its defeat in World
War I in 1923); The Spanish Empire, at its peak in the 15th century,
was the new hegemon, with its plunder of overseas colonies and its
control of the European continent; The concept of the unity of all
things is a typical feature of the Greek spirit, which has left precious
spiritual and scientific wealth for modern mankind. The ancient Greek
"city-state" governance efficiency gave birth to numerous scientific
sages shining stars, and the history of Western science shows that the
ancient Greek civilization has lasted until now to form the natural
science heyday of today's "modern" highly civilized civilization!
Historians of science, however, have wondered why the ancient Greek
miracle civilization mysteriously disappeared in just over a century.
Ancient Greek scientists since 625 BC the great scientists Thales
(Solon, Chillon, Bias, Pitakus, Periander, Cleobus - the Seven sages ofAncient Greece), Socrates, Ptolemy, Plato, Pythagoras, Aristotle,
Archimedes, Euclid, Eratosthenes, etc... For the unprecedented
"city-state" highly civilization built an unprecedented great glory and
highly developed and rising natural science giant frontier; Only during
the Italian Renaissance, great scientists such as Leonardo Da Vinci and
Galileo all took Archimedes as their role model; It can be said that
"theoretical genius and experimental genius in one idealized body"!
Archimedes, the most perfect scientist, wrote in his lifetime (287 BC -
212 BC) "On Spheres and Cylinders", "Measurement of Circles",
"Quadrantism of Parabola", "On spirals", "On cones and Spheres",
The Calculation of Sand and other mathematical works. As a
mechanic, he wrote "On the balance of figures", "on floating bodies",
"on levers", "Principles" and other mechanical works, known in
history as "the first scientist who moved the earth", Archimedes
continued Thales all the ancient Greek scientists created the
"post-relativity" epistemology. Has
become the scientific
methodology relied on for the development of 5000 years of human
science history - here, the only symbol of the "point to point"
methodology principle in ancient Greece is the "point to point"
quantum property celestial measurement principle created by
Ptolemy: "Opposite point" If the Earth is located at a certain distance
from the center of a given circle, the "opposite point" is the mirror
image of the Earth's position, on the other side of the center of the
circle, and the point is the same distance from the center of the circle
as the center of the circle is from the earth, and then he uses this
point to define the motion on the circle, and the points on the circle
are not moving at a constant speed, but at a variable speed. The law
of velocity change is such that an observation at the "opposite point"
appears to be in uniform motion. Thus, the setting of the "opposite
point" is an affront to the ancient Greek principle that the motions of
celestial bodies must be uniform and circular. But it is clear that
Ptolemy was more concerned with the precise prediction of planetary
positions and mathematical convenience than with the question of
truth. Here, the observer is a "point", another "point" on any planet
"a point at a certain distance from the center of a given circle", and
any "an observer" point "on the" opposite point "(Earth)" - generating
a "quantum entanglement" type of interaction between the observer
on Earth and any star sphere in the universe. You can observe andmathematically calculate big data on the universe, Earth, any star,
planet, galaxy... The galactic data of two "points" of entanglement is
the predecessor of Ptolemy's "post-relativistic" cosmological
epistemology, which applied the quantum entanglement properties of
all things in the universe. As can be seen from Ptolemy's "On the
Greatest", the historical combination of Apollonius and Hipparchus'
eccentric circle, epicycle, homocycle... Completed the mathematical
determination that the "Sunday rotation" of the starry sky is a
reflection of the Sunday movement of the Earth around the axis of
rotation... - "point against point" corresponds to the principle of
relativity: it is constant regardless of who is in the Earth, the moon,
other galaxies, or any state of motion. No matter who looks at physics
from what point of view, the laws of physics do not change - this
"post-relativistic" cosmological epistemology continued to be applied
until the 14th century, until Galileo's "Galilean principle of relativity"
continued into the 21st century, Its profound mystery only got the
Nobel Prize of three scientists in the 2020s to experimentally verify
the breach of Bell's inequality, thus proving the completeness of
quantum mechanics and revealing the only eternity of the soul of
"post-relativistic cosmological epistemology"!
Second, the Big Bang Force is the microscopic quantum
"entanglement" that existed at the beginning of "quantum
entanglement"
primitive
The universe begins with a "singularity" big "explosion", the
explosion requires super-giant energy to produce a big explosion in a
singularity, quantum is the only quantum that can transport
everything between the universe, super gathered on a point that the
big Bang (human can never see the microscopic energy quantum),
quantum is the force, [10-35 seconds after the big bang: At about
1027 degrees, during inflation (the first push), gravity separated and
quarks, bosons, and leptons formed. During this period, the universe
cooled enough that the strong interaction could be separated, while
the weak interaction and electromagnetic interaction remained
unified in the so-called electroweak interaction.
The universe began to undergo inflation, which lasted only 10-33
seconds, during which time the universe experienced 100 doubling(2100), resulting in a scale of 1030 of the previous scale- According to
"quantum entanglement" is two or more particles in the entangled
state in quantum mechanics, that is, they are separated by a long
distance, and some states will behave like a whole force, humans have
long had no way to explain why quantum entanglement can exceed
the speed of light, and do not need a medium (action at a distance)
can interact with each other - in the language of today's physics: For a
multiparticle system in an entangled state, the scalar substate
function cannot be decomposed into the product of the quantum
states of its parts. In popular terms, quantum entanglement refers to
two or more particles separated in space, due to some interaction, so
that the information or physical properties of each particle become
the overall characteristics and cannot be separated, which is why it is
called "entanglement".
At the beginning of the Big Bang (10-12 seconds after the Big
Bang: about 1015 degrees, particle period), the Big Bang used
quantum entanglement to create an indivisible whole and an implicit
order - everything in the universe, and proved that the Force is the
microscopic quantum origin of the initial existence of "quantum
entanglement". Quantum entanglement means that when two
separated particles or multiple particles interact with each other, the
properties of each particle are completely integrated into the whole
property, and the general observer experiment cannot describe the
properties of each particle independently in the process after the Big
Bang. In view of this, Ptolemy's "point" setting, at no cost to offend
the ancient Greek principle that the motion of celestial bodies must
be uniform circular motion, opened the "circular variable speed
motion" of cosmic planets, and is an unprecedented "post-relativistic"
cosmic epistemological revolution...
Third, Ptolemy used "point" for the world's human science
pyramid, the universe "everything is number"
Foundation for quantum applications
In 2003, we stressed at the beginning of "Give You the Fulcrum
of Innovation" that for 5,000 years, "the pyramid of science is
completely different from the throne of power of historical dynasties
in social development; once it is established, it never collapses, and it
does not need to violently change from dynasty to dynasty to achieveits development as it overthrows the rotten throne of power." Every
innovation in the history of science is building the foundation of the
pyramid of human science, and will make the pyramid of human
science more magnificent, bigger and more brilliant, which is the
magnificent, tall and brilliant that will never end." - "Give You the
Fulcrum of Innovation" page 2
We say that the magnificent, tall and brilliant pyramid of human
science is precisely the great pioneering work of many scientific giants
since Thales in ancient Greece. Therefore, the formation of "endless
future of the grand, tall and brilliant"! In fact, in 127 AD, Ptolemy, at
no cost to violate the ancient Greek principle that the motion of
celestial bodies must be uniform and circular, opened the "circular
motion" of cosmic planets, and gave detailed mathematical theories
of the motion of the sun, moon and stars, Mars, and water planets. By
providing details of the motion of each planet, the most primitive
contribution was made; It can be called an unprecedented
"post-relativity" cosmic epistemological revolution, aiming at lofty
heights and safeguarding the hard-won "everything is number"
scientific achievements of Plato and Aristotle's predecessors.
In ancient Greece and Rome, mathematics, astronomy, physics,
biology, atomism, cosmology, agriculture, geography, and medicine
achieved brilliant achievements, and made great contributions to the
development of modern science, especially all modern scientific
fields. ... This is why Ptolemy discovered the celestial sphere 膸
circular orbit "circular variable speed movement", but still retained
Plato, Aristotle's geostatic theory, the original intention is to use many
ancient Greek scientists to shape the world's human science pyramid
unbreakable, inherited thousands of generations of pyramid
cornerstone ah!
Ptolemy's geostationary history has long passed on to human
science "post-relativistic cosmology.
The Great cosmic pattern of the scientific pyramid of Knowledge
The Treatise is a record of Ptolemy's astronomical observations,
dated from March 26, 127 AD to February 2, 141 AD, all of which
were made in Alexandria, Egypt (then under Roman rule). And
continued the astronomical records observed by the mathematician
Thion (his teacher) and the ancient philosopher Aristotle's inner Earthwheel; This is a historical [" post-relativistic "epistemology] humanist
heritage of natural man science: although Ptolemy attempted to
explain the motions of the celestial solar system on the premise that
the universe is centered on the Earth and that all celestial bodies
move at uniform speeds in perfectly circular orbits. And using the
"counterpoint" it was already known that the actual celestial body
moved in an elliptical orbit beyond the Earth in a degree of "circular
velocity", and that some very complex geometries had to be
considered in order to maintain the basic assumptions from
Platono-Aristotelian history. Ptolemy therefore used three complex
primitions: epicycles, eccentric circles, and homocycle. The "Inner
Earth wheel" was first proposed by Aristotle, and Ptolemy inherited
Aristotle's inner Earth wheel and used the data accumulated by
predecessors and his own long-term observation to complete the
8-volume "On the Greatest". In the book, Ptolemy expanded
Aristotle's 9 layers of heaven to 11 layers, changed the dynamic
heaven to crystal heaven, and added the heaven of the highest and
the heaven of pure fire. Ptolemy envisioned a completely
post-relativistic epistemology in which the planets moved in a smaller
circle, and the center of each circle moved in a circle centered on the
Earth, from near to far in the order of the moon, Mercury, Venus, the
sun, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, and finally the star sphere, The
arrangement of the Ptolemaic "geocentric" (also known as the static
theory) cosmic structure - this is the historical origin of the inner
earth wheel.
The reason why Ptolemy's celestial model can be popular for
1300 years is that the history of science inherits the characteristics of
"post-relativistic" epistemology:
1. A circular variable elliptical orbit with a uniform angular
velocity around a certain center is historically consistent with the
dominant Platonic hypothesis and fits into Aristotelian physics.
2, with several different combinations of circular orbits to predict
the movement of the planets, Mars, Venus and Mercury orbit
respectively to give a reasonable description of the actual difference
is very small, and can well explain the brightness of the planet
changes.
3. The statement that the earth does not move is completely
consistent with the Christian faith and the Pope's will.The Copernican "heliocentrism" of the celestial sphere did not
change Ptolemaic astronomy.
The epistemological cornerstone of the pyramid instead evolved
the universe into a perfect elliptical orbit and cosmic harmony
ART
1,300 years later, in 1453, Copernicus spent his life publishing his
Treatise on the Movement of the Celestial Bodies (Copernicus
touched the Treatise of the Celestial Bodies, closed his eyes, and died
peacefully). Here, the observation of the celestial sphere of the
universe is exactly the same as Ptolemy's big data, except that the
center of the Earth's rotation is changed to the center of the sun, and
that is all - in fact, the restoration of the "heliocentrism" in ancient
Greece was a matter of time; Because in ancient Greece, the
heliocentric theory was first proposed in the 3rd century BC, the
ancient Greek astronomer Aristarchus (310-230 BC) believed that the
planets revolve around the sun, the Earth orbits the sun once a year,
and the earth rotates once a day on its own axis. The outermost side
is the star; In fact, what Aristarchus, Ptolemy and Copernicus
observed was the same cosmic object of nature's movement, all of
which were the cosmic motion ecology that appeared in humans 13.8
billion years after the Big Bang, and this universe would not appear in
1300 years, both rotating around the center of the earth. The
universe revolves around the center of the sun; That is to say,
Aristarchus, Ptolemy and Copernicus observed that the big data of the
universe is a unified universe, and the key to the existence of the
problem is the black cage in the papacy - scientists can only wait for
the divine flash of [post-relativistic "epistemology] to become the
pyramid of human science before Copernicus can appear... In fact,
Copernicus's theory of the sun is not exactly located in the center of
the planet's circular orbit, but deviated from the center of the circle,
and did not inherit Ptolemy's elliptical orbit, the heliocentric system
of the sun stationary, at best known as the "static", here, has not left
Plato and Aristotle's "static" word. What's that about? ! -
The history of science also needs to wait for the "post-relativist"
epistemology "The pyramid of human science once again came to
light, waiting for the German astronomer Kepler's three laws in
1609-1619 to prove the harmonious art theory of the universe! ...Why does Aristotle's encyclopedia, especially physics, dominate
the history of human science
It has been the basis of modern science for more than 2,000
years, thanks to Ptolemy's "post-relative.
Epistemology of "On"
The important and only sign of the scientific glory of ancient
Greece is the scientific giant Aristotle, whose encyclopedic brilliance
covers ethics, metaphysics, psychology, economics, theology, politics,
rhetoric, natural sciences, pedagogy, poetry, custom, and Athenian
law; Aristotle's writings constructed the first broad system of Western
philosophy, encompassing morality, aesthetics, logic and science,
politics and metaphysics, and so on... Aristotle established the first
extensive scientific system, which included an unprecedented number
of disciplines. Aristotle's wide range of scientific research and
profound, profound logical methods, reaching the peak of the ancient
Greek scientific pyramid, scientific achievements and wisdom are
unprecedented... Aristotle's all-inclusive scientific works have
dominated the history of human science for more than 2,000 years
and have been handed down to the present day, completely thanks to
the quantum (" post-relativistic "epistemology) created by Ptolemy's"
number "and" point "- this" post-relativistic "epistemology has
continuously raised the height of the human scientific pyramid and
sublimated the observational science of ancient Greece. Reach
pyramid glory!
So, why did Aristotle think that the size of the rain will not fall at
the same time? ?
More than 300 years ago BC, ancient Greek scientific masters
from Thales, Plato, Aristotle has continued the observation of
empirical epistemology, and eventually led Aristotle to believe that:
"Objects falling from high altitude, heavy objects fall faster than light
ones!" That is to say, the heavy rain falls first, and the light rain falls
after the ground! "The speed of an object's fall is determined by the
weight of the object itself; the heavier the object, the faster it falls;
Otherwise, it falls more slowly." The Aristotelian principle of gravity
has influenced mankind for more than two thousand years.
For 3000 years, ancient Greek science was all observational
science and developed to an unprecedented peak. Most of thescientific theoretical conclusions come from the wisdom of Aristotle,
after the modification of Ptolemy's "The Greatest Theory", there are
still some flaws, and in 1543, it was sublimated by Copernicus's
"heliocentric theory". Later, in 1591, Galileo, in "On Motion",
repeatedly mentioned the experiment of objects falling from the
tower, and made his own explanation for the simultaneous landing.
Galileo further relied on mathematical reasoning to transform the
falling body experiment into an inclined plane experiment, and
accurately measured the relationship between distance and time to
conclude the Pisa tilted Tower experiment; Galileo Galilei wrote in his
Dialogue of the Two New Sciences in 1636:
"If, according to Aristotle's theory, there are two stones, the
larger one has a weight of 8 and the smaller one has a speed of 4,
then the larger one has a speed of 8 and the smaller one has a speed
of 4, and when the two stones are tied together, the faster one will be
slowed down by the slower one." So the overall system is falling
between 4 and 8. But if the total weight of two stones tied together is
12, the falling speed should be greater than 8, which is a paradox."
The Leaning Tower of Pisa experiment created the first "experimental
science" in the history of human science and a great scientific
milestone - Galileo's creation of "experimental science" greatly
enriched the pyramid of human science
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 11
And room to rise upward... Just started out of the modern
experimental science of heaven and earth!
The collision of Aristotle's law of inertia and Galileo's Law of
inertia produced experimental science
The Great New Era highlights that the "post-relativistic"
epistemology makes the pyramid of human science constantly leap to
the peak
In the introduction to the Greatest Treatise, Ptolemy explained
that the Earth could not be regarded as a moving star, but only
mathematically explained that if the Earth rotated from west to east,
we should be able to see all the east and west on the Earth moving
west, and should not follow the Earth closely, which also comes fromAristotle's "law of inertia". Ptolemy's use of the epicycles shows that
it has been passed on for 1300 years; In physics, Aristotle's law states
that "bodies can remain in motion only if they are in direct contact
with a constantly acting agent." Aristotle's Law of inertia marks a
turning point in the history of ancient Greek science, and is the first
scientific master who engaged in extensive empirical investigation to
achieve subversion. This law of physics is a shallow conclusion drawn
by Aristotle from daily experience, which has not yet been tested by
strict experimental science, and there is inevitably a problem of
breakthrough to experiment in the history of science... Therefore, the
pyramid of human science must undergo a leap of sublimation:
In 1590, Galileo's experiments on the Leaning Tower of Pisa
showed that the size of the rain fell simultaneously, The bevel-plane
ideal experiment was used by Galileo to show that on a smooth
horizontal surface, a ball can move forever without force, so that
force is what changes the state of motion of the object, not what
maintains it. According to Galileo's law of inertia, if an object is at rest,
it will remain at rest if it is not forced or subjected to a balancing force.
If a body has a velocity, it will continue to move at that velocity - that
is, Aristotle's law that "every body can maintain its motion only if it is
in direct contact with an acting agent." It is only emphasized that "the
direct contact of the promoter can maintain the movement." It
ignores that "if an object is at rest, it will remain at rest if it is not
forced or subjected to a balanced force." Galileo made a detailed
study of the basic concepts of motion, including center of gravity,
velocity, acceleration and so on, and gave strict mathematical
expressions. In particular, the concept of acceleration is a milestone in
the history of mechanics. With the concept of acceleration, the
dynamic part of mechanics could be put on a scientific basis, whereas
before Galileo only the statics part of Aristotle had a quantitative
description. Galileo also made experiments and observations on the
motion of objects on inclined planes, the motion of projectiles, and so
on. On the basis of these studies, he proposed the concept of
acceleration and its mathematical expression, and proposed the law
of inertia and the law of movement of objects under the action of
external forces. For the first time, the concept of inertial reference
frame (inertial frame) and the relativity principle of motion "Galilean
relativity" laid the foundation for Newton to formally put forwardNewton's first law and Newton's second law; maximumThe principle
of relativity in mechanics can be derived. Derivation:
There are two reference frames S(Oxyz) and S'(O'x'y'z'), the axes
are parallel to each other and the axes x coincide with the axes x', the
S' relative to S moves in a straight line with constant speed u along
the x axis, and the clocks in the S system and the S' system have the
same structure everywhere, and the time of recording is t and t'. And
with the two coordinate origin O and O' coincidence time as the
starting point, the space-time transformation relationship of the
motion of a particle m in the two reference systems can be obtained:
x'=x - ut y'=y z'=z t'=t
The above formula is the Galilean transformation. If you
differentiate the various pairs of time, you get the velocity
transformation formula:
vx'=vx - u vy'=vy vz'=vz
Therefore, if S is an inertial system, that is, a body that is not
acted on by an external force moves in a straight line with constant
velocity, then according to the above equation, it must also move in a
straight line with constant velocity in S', so S' is also an inertial system.
If we take the derivative of the various types again with respect to
time, we get the acceleration transformation relation:
ax'=ax
ay'=ay
az'=az
That's a'=a. Therefore, if S is an inertial frame, i.e., where F=ma is
true, then there is also F=ma' in S', so S' is also an inertial frame. This
leads to the principle of mechanical relativity from the Galilean
transformation. [1]
9. The three laws from Galileo to Newton have greatly and firmly
extended Socrates, Plato,
From Aristotle to Ptolemy, the foundation of the pyramid of
human science stands at its magnificent peak
leap
"Nature and the laws of nature were hidden in the darkness of
the night, and God said, 'Let Newton be born!' Then everything
became bright. '" -- Alexander Pope
In 1687, Newton completed the publication of the epoch-making
scientific masterpiece, The Mathematical Principles of Natural
Philosophy, which proposed Newton's first law of motion, Newton'ssecond law of motion and Newton's third law of motion. Scientific
calendar
Historically referred to as "classical mechanics" :
Newton's first law: all bodies always remain in uniform motion in
a straight line or at rest until an external force forces it to change this
state.
Newton's second Law: The acceleration of a body is proportional
to the combined force F on the body, and inversely proportional to
the mass m of the body, and the direction of acceleration is the same
as the direction of the combined force.
Newton's Third Law: The action and reaction between two
bodies are always equal and opposite, acting in a straight line.
The laws of Newton's laws of motion are independent of each
other, and the internal logic is consistent with itself. The scope of
application is classical mechanics, and the conditions of application
are particle, inertial reference frame and macroscopic and low-speed
motion problems. Newton's laws of motion explain the complete
system of Newton's mechanics and the basic laws of motion in
classical mechanics, and are widely used in various fields.
It can be said at any time that without the principle of "point to
point" relativity from Socrates, Plato, Aristotle to Ptolemy, there
would be no "heliocentrism" of Copernicus 1300 years later; If there
were no Copernican "heliocentrism", there would never have been
Galileo to defend the Copernican theory of earth motion, and there
would not have been a "Galilean principle of relativity". If there were
no Aristotle's law of inertia, there would never have been Galileo's
law of inertia and later Newton's three laws, which built the
magnificent scientific pyramid of classical mechanics. Without
Galilean relativity, there would be no Lorenz transform and special
relativity! ... Why is that?
See the historical interpretation of science: ①, 4th century BC,
Aristotle 384 BC - 322 BC) pointed out: Static is the natural state of
the object, if there is no force, there is no movement (force is the
cause of maintaining the movement of the object), the 6th century
AD, the Greek scholar Philoponus (J. hiloponus) on Aristotle's motion
theory proposed that the throwing body itself has some kind of power,
push the object forward, Until exhaustion tends to stop, put forwardthe concept of stillness, ③ in the 14th century, the French
philosopher Jean Buridan (1295-1358?) , Albert, Nicole Oresme,
1320? 1382) and others put forward the "impulse theory" which
states: "When a mover pushes an object to move,
The greater the speed, the greater the force, and when the force
is exhausted, the object comes to a halt." (4) In the 17th century,
Galileo repeatedly proposed a statement similar to the principle of
inertia in his works. In 1632 and 1638, he wrote Dialogues on the Two
World systems of Ptolemy and Copernicus.
And "Dialogue on the Two New Sciences of Mechanics and
Motion of Position" recorded the ideal slope experiment,⑤,
In 1644, the French physicist Rene Descartes (1596-1650) made
up for Galileo's shortcomings in his Principia Philosophia, stating
explicitly that a body would remain at rest or in motion forever unless
acted upon by an external cause, and specifically stating, An object in
inertial motion never causes itself to move toward a curve, but only
stays in a straight line. In 1662, Galileo Galilei pointed out: "An object
moving at any speed can maintain its speed as long as the external
causes of acceleration or deceleration are removed."
Descartes also said: "In the absence of external action, particles
either move at a constant speed or are at rest." -
In other words, Newton took the above assumption as Newton's
first law of motion, and further extended Galileo's ideas to the
occasion of powerful action, and proposed Newton's second law of
motion; In 1673, the French physicist Mario (EdmeMarotte,
1620-1684) used two simple pendulum to do collision experiments,
cleverly measured the instantaneous speed before and after the
collision. Newton also repeated the experiment, and further
discussed the effect of air resistance and improvement methods, and
revised the results; In August 1684, under the persuasion of the
English physicist Edmondo Halley (1656-1742), Newton began to write
the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy, systematically
arranging the manuscript and reconsidering some of the problems. In
November 1685, a two-volume monograph was formed. On July 5,
1687, the Principia was published in Latin. In the section of Axioms or
Laws of motion in the introduction of Principia, Newton's laws of
motion are proposed, which get rid of the bondage of old ideas. ⑨,to solve the bell also need to be the bell person, Edmundo Halley
persuaded Newton to write the "Mathematical Principles of Natural
philosophy"; Halley used Newton's law of gravitation and the theory
of planetary motion to calculate the orbits of these comets,
confirming that the three comets predicted in 1531, 1607, and 1682
were the same comet, returning once every 76 years, and proving
that the law of gravitation was classically correct and universal.
Ten, [post-relativistic epistemology] origin of the Big Bang in
ancient Greece in 3000 years of the city
Good to create the supreme pyramid of human science
uninterruptible eternal glory
So, what is the "post-relativistic" epistemology 5,000 years ago?
In order to vividly understand the "post-relativity", we look at a
mysterious "cat" that is not dead or alive - "Schrodinger's cat" :
Inside a closed box is a cat and a release device connected to
radioactive material. After a certain period of time, the radioactive
material may undergo atomic decay, which is triggered by the relay to
release the gas, or it may not decay, so according to common sense,
the cat is dead or alive. Yes, but not sure! This is the original intention
of quantum mechanics' uncertainty principle. Is it a live cat or a dead
cat? It takes time; Short hours and days, many years, or even decades
- time waiting for the "toxic gas" release of the cat to die, or no decay
of the cat to live - dead cats, live cats are determined, only time and
wait are uncertain two overlapping, showing the "quantum
entanglement" space-time instinct properties!
Conclusion: Given up time, waiting space, there is certainty only
after the cat comes out dead or alive - this is relativity after relativity -
the only (deterministic) conclusion of "post-relativistic" epistemology!
As explained by the universal "uncertainty" principle in quantum
mechanics, wave packet collapse depends on observation, which
takes time and wait... Waiting for the process, the cat should be in a
superposition state, which is relative, and highlights the dilemma of
this explanation and the unknowable uncertainty principle - this is the
dilemma of "quantum entanglement" that the universe cannot get rid
of at all, and only time can smooth the "quantum entanglement" that
seems not to be filled; If you don't open the box, you don't know the
status of the cat, the cat may have died, or there may be radiationNo change, the cat is still fine or has been poisoned to death.
The amount between this common sense and microscopic specificity
Child entanglement "gap - the length of the wait and time is
relative, the cat is dead and the cat is alive determinate by the
relativity of the wait and time, only open the box, all confusion is
eliminated. Get the certainty of living and dead cats! ... This is
relativity after relativity - we call it "post-relativistic" epistemology!
The history of science proves that Einstein used
"post-relativistic" epistemology to discover "a broad sense.
"The Theory of Relativity" confirms the most valuable monument
of the human scientific pyramid since the ancient Greeks 3,000 years
ago
Thinking methodology
Scientific historical facts are indisputable! The "post-relativistic"
epistemology is the product of Einstein's discovery of the
"post-relativistic" cognition process of general relativity, which is the
"Lorenz transformation". The Lorentz transformation is the coordinate
transformation between two inertial reference frames (S and S ') that
move at a relatively uniform speed in special relativity, and the
transformation relationship between physical quantities measured by
the observer between different inertial reference frames (at the point
of reference). In mathematics the table is now a set of equations. The
Lorentz transformation is named after its creator, the Dutch physicist
H. Lorentz.
Lorentz transformations were originally used to reconcile the
contradictions between classical electrodynamics and Newtonian
mechanics established in the 19th century, and later became the basic
equations of special relativity. In 1905, Einstein discovered the special
theory of relativity, there can not explain Newton's force, had to
further study, after ten years of research, one day, Einstein suddenly
had a flash of inspiration: "I can't feel the gravitational field when I
jump down", I used a "equivalence principle" to complete the
discovery of the relativity theory after special relativity - known as
"general relativity" in history - its essence is the falsification of the
universe's "post-relativistic" epistemological methodology!
In view of this, "post-relativity" is the epistemology determined
by Einstein's dualistic thinking; In fact, the essence of generalrelativity to special relativity is that Einstein used the
"post-relativistic" epistemology to solve the contradiction between
gravitation and special relativity.
In 1905, Einstein took over the special relativity theory of Lorenz
transformation, in the process of application, found that special
relativity and gravitation there is a contradiction, special relativity can
not explain the gravitational physical law of gravitation, can not unify
the theory of gravitation and the principle of relativity; I had to go
back to study some connection between gravity and special relativity,
looking for an entry point - Einstein once recalled: "The happiest
thought of my life... Take the following form There is no gravitational
field for a man falling free from a roof -- at least not in his immediate
surroundings." Einstein used ten years of profound thinking
methodology, and in 1915, he had an Epiphany that did not feel the
nature of the transformation of the "gravitational field" into the
"equivalence principle", that is, the epistemology of relativity after
the completion of relativity: general relativity after special relativity!
(Equivalent to Einstein's "post-relativistic" whole process of waiting
and time study by unconsciously applying post-relativistic thinking to
the universe) - the history of science has been proved since ancient
times: ancient Greece since the invention of Ptolemy 3,000 years ago
The "post-relativistic" epistemology of the "counterpoint" was
developed until Einstein discovered general relativity in 1915,
Naturally confirmed that "post-relativistic epistemology" is the
most valuable multi-dimensional method of human science pyramid
monument! - But ah! So far, the "post-relativistic" epistemology has
not ended the continuous debate! ? But it has already become the
unspoken rule of human history writing (all the history of the world is
written by later generations according to their own consciousness!).
The Copenhagen School, headed by Bohr, had a great
controversy with Einstein at the Solvay Conference
The interpretation concluded that Einstein's "determinism" was
completely wrong and won the 2022 Nobel Prize
Certificate
In 1927, the Fifth Solvay Conference was held in Brussels,
Belgium, which broke out in the great debate between Albert Einstein
and Niels Bohr, and this Solvay Summit is known as the most famous.The Solvay Conference (3-5 sessions) highlighted the Copenhagen
interpretation as an interpretation of quantum mechanics. According
to the Copenhagen interpretation, in quantum mechanics, the
quantum state of a quantum system can be described in terms of a
wave function, which is a key feature of quantum mechanics. The
wave function is a mathematical function designed to calculate the
probability of a particle being in a certain position or in a certain state
of motion, and the measured action causes the wave function to
collapse. The original quantum state probabilistically collapses into a
quantum state permitted by the measurement; Although Einstein still
refused to admit his defeat, he said that "God does not throw dice"
and defended "certainty"...
In fact, the more radical quantum mechanics mercilessly rejects
Einstein's classical causality, and the Copenhagen interpretation
declares that humanity cannot attain definitive results for the real
world! The Copenhagen School has repeatedly demonstrated that
quantum mechanics claims that it can only infer the probability of the
distribution of the results of the next measurement from this
measurement, and refuses to give a specific description of the
behavior of things between measurements (post-relativistic
epistemology); The famous "uncertainty principle" has become a
theoretical barrier that relativity has not been able to cross so far, and
the conclusion of the great debate of scientific history lasting 28 years
is merciless! (Although Einstein never admitted he was wrong)...
Although scientists such as Einstein pointed out that quantum
mechanics was "incomplete" at the time, and even believed that new
theories would appear in the future to replace quantum mechanics! ?
However, no new theory has been born to replace it! ... Since 95 years,
scientists have faced Einstein's "incompleteness", and human
scientists have continued to carry out research and scientific
experiments for nearly a hundred years, until the 2022 Nobel Prize in
PhysicsThe function describing these waves is called the "wave
function" - if the Earth is located at a point some distance from the
center of a given circle, the "opposite point" is the mirror image of
the Earth's position, on the other side of the center of the circle, and
the point is the same distance from the center of the circle as the
center of the circle is from the Earth. He then uses this point to define
motion in a circle, where points do not move at a constant speed, butat a variable speed, in such a way that an observation at an "opposite
point" appears to be moving at a constant speed. Thus, the setting of
the "opposite point" is an affront to the ancient Greek principle that
celestial bodies must move in a uniform circular motion. But Ptolemy
was clearly more concerned with accurate planetary position
predictions and mathematical convenience than with the question of
truth. It is this "wave function" that was accidentally applied to
quantum mathematics in ancient Greece by Ptolemy. In view of this,
the phenomenon of "quantum entanglement" naturally began in the
Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago, [10-12 seconds after the big Bang:
about 1015 degrees, the particle period, protons and neutrons and
their antiparticles formed, bosons, neutrinos, electrons, quarks and
gluons stabilized...] That is, in "10-12 seconds after the Big Bang:
About 1015 degrees, the particle phase, the formation of protons and
neutrons and their antiparticles ", in "10-33 seconds, in this instant,
the universe undergoes 100 doubling (2100), resulting in a scale 1030
times larger than the previous scale" - according to the modern
scientific definition of "quantum entanglement", In quantum
mechanics, two or more particles in entangled states, even separated
by great distances, some states will behave like a single force, and
humans have long been unable to explain why quantum
entanglement can exceed the speed of light and affect each other
without the need for a medium (action at a distance) - in the language
of today's physics:
For an entangled multiparticle system, the quantum state
function cannot be decomposed into the product of the quantum
states of its parts. In popular terms, quantum entanglement refers to
two or more particles separated in space, due to some interaction, so
that the information or physical properties of each particle become
the overall characteristics and cannot be separated, which is why it is
called "entanglement". However, in the great debate between the
Copenhagen School and Einstein in 1926, Einstein always wanted to
compare some phenomena in quantum mechanics with some
phenomena in the macroscopic world, such as the Bell inequality
involving local reality - Einstein used this "locality" to negate Newton's
classical mechanics. And criticize and completely negate: "Newton's
laws of motion are beyond the classical mechanical norm.When applicable conditions such as circumference or particle,
inertial reference frame, and macroscopic, low-velocity motion
problems are no longer true."
So, what is Bell's inequality?
In 1964, John Bell defined an observable measurement, and
based on the local hidden variable theory predicted that the
measurement value is not greater than 2. With the theory of
quantum mechanics, measurements greater than 2 can be obtained.
Once the experimental measurement results are greater than 2, it
means that the local hidden variable theory is wrong - this is the "Bell
inequality"; Its principle is David Bohm in 1952, the introduction of
"hidden variables", on the basis of local realism to form a completely
decisive theory - local hidden variable theory.
David Bohm believes that there is a hidden variable that controls
the seemingly inconceivable things in the quantum world... In fact,
the experimental verification of Bell's inequality theorem is a physical
experiment designed to test whether the theory of quantum
mechanics is correct or the theory of local hidden variables. In other
words, "measurements greater than 2" are incorrect (in fact, in
quantum mechanics measurements are all greater than 2)! From
Krause to Aspe to Zeilinger, generations of physicists have finally
proved with conclusive experimental data that quantum
entanglement is a real existence.
Scientists must go back and re-examine the Michelson-Morley
experiment
Such is "a completely deterministic theory - the local hidden
variable theory." Love's product
"A completely deterministic theory - the local hidden variable
theory." The experiment that led to the invalidity of Bell's inequality
completely proved the objective existence of "quantum
entanglement". Therefore, we must go back and re-examine the
"Michelson-Morley experiment" is also "a completely deterministic
theory - the local hidden variable theory." (The probe is an
interferometer) The beam speeds up or slows down depending on its
motion with respect to the aether wind, which will result in a
non-alignment on the interferometer. They fully expected to find a
value for the speed of the aether wind. However, in the numeroustests conducted, they did not notice any difference in the detected
speed of light. It is always equal to c - here, we emphasize:
"Ethereum" is "the completely deterministic theory - the local hidden
variable theory." It doesn't exist! Wind is a natural phenomenon
caused by the movement of air, which is caused by the radiant heat of
the sun. The sun shines on the surface of the earth, making the
surface temperature rise, and the air on the surface becomes lighter
and rises. As the warm air rises, the cold air flows in horizontally. As
the rising air cools down and becomes heavier, it falls down. As the
surface temperature is higher, it warms the air and causes it to rise.
(See Figure 6 on page 17 of "Giving You the Fulcrum of Innovation") It
can be seen that ether cannot form an "ether wind"...
The word "Ether" is a transliteration of the English ether or
Aether. First proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, the
idea is a universal substance whose contents evolve with the
development of physics. In Aristotle's view, in addition to water, fire,
air, and earth, there is an ether that resides in the upper part of the
sky. The quantum nature of the aether is a mystery in the history of
science...
Arab scientist Al Hassen's "Optical complete" application of
spherical mirrors and parabolic mirrors found
Magnifying effect of lens and atmospheric refraction, became
the first scholar to study optics; Huygens' "medium in any
The wave state in one place is determined by the waves in other
places "and believes that the aether, to a large extent as the load of
light waves, is associated with the wave theory of light, and later
developed to the" uncertainty principle "of the" duality of waves and
particles."
The wave theory of light was first proposed by R. Hooke and
further developed into the wave theory for C. Huygens' research, and
in the 17th century, Descartes further enriched the connotation of
"aether" - French mathematician R. Huygens Descartes established
the "etheric vortex theory" to explain the motion of the planets in the
solar system. Descartes' idea of aether not only overturns Aristotle's
imaginary hypothesis of "aether", but also enriches the imaginary
space of future physics.
At the same time, the Dutch C. Huygens and the British R. Hookeadvocated the wave theory of light, and both assumed that space had
an omnipresent ether, which became the real existence of the wave.
Since the 17th century, "ether" has been called "luminous ether" or
"light ether". - Descartes completed the Human Philosophy of
Descartes in 1664 and proposed the concept of "aether", which is
considered to be a real micro-matter with a "super force"
micro-matter - from the Nobel Prize in Physics in October 2022, three
physicists have demonstrated that "action at a distance" exists,
manifested as quantum entanglement. So the aether is quantum! It's
just that for the past 3,000 years human scientists have said "ether" in
light fluctuations! ...
The experimental proof of "super force" first came from
Faraday's "Electrical Experimental Research", which proposed the
traversal "action at a distance", subverted the traditional thinking,
and became the "force line" of "super force".
Faraday has a very firm belief: Faraday is convinced that the
world is unified and harmonious, whether it is electricity, magnetism,
light, heat or gravity, there should be a close connection. So, what
about the magic light? When Faraday followed David through Italy, he
watched an experiment done by an Italian scientist named Moricini...
Faraday remembered, he put these transparent, conductive
electrolytes between two electrodes, applied a high voltage to the
electrodes, and then let a beam of polarized light through the
electrolyte; The result was no reaction to polarized light and failed.
Faraday replaced conductive electrolytes with non-conductive
electrolytes, such as turpentine, crystals, ice SPAR, etc. - Faraday
made a remarkable argument in 1816. He said: "The attraction of
gravity, the attraction of electricity and the attraction of magnetism...
It seems that Enough to explain all the spontaneous conversions and
attachments we're familiar with... Chemistry is based on the cohesion
of a substance and the affinity of an object, and both cohesion and
affinity are attractive... The attraction and chemical attraction of
aggregates are in fact the same as the attraction of gravity and the
attraction of electricity, I cannot be absolutely certain, but we believe
that they are so." In other words, the "super force" of aether and the
"action at a distance" of "quantum entanglement" are completely the
same, and aether is quantum! The history of science completely
proves that "Michelson-Morley experiment" and "Bell inequalityexperiment" are "non-local" experiments; Faster-than-light cosmic
matter is real.
Cosmic "quantum entanglement" faster than light speed is a
unique and real existence in quantum mechanics
See the human science pyramid "faster-than-light" sublimation
peak
For, "faster-than-light" Einstein thought that this phenomenon
would never occur, and called this phenomenon
For spooky action at a distance, the problem stems from the fact
that "quantum mechanics is incomplete." In view of this, Einstein
hoped to establish a more general local realism theory to make up for
the shortcomings of quantum theory and eliminate the action at a
distance. In fact, "action at a distance" has nothing to do with the
distance between particles; Can be measured at the same time, can
also be delayed measurement, that is, faster than light speed;
Unrelated to the space environment, electromagnetic shielding,
gravitational shielding, etc., can not block their connection, which is
the connection between two particles in an entangled state, and the
existence of cosmic matter exceeding the speed of light is real.
The historical sublimation of the formation of the pyramid of
human science has always been similar: In 1915, Einstein said that
Newton's laws of motion no longer hold when they are outside the
scope of classical mechanics or the applicable conditions of particles,
inertial reference frames, and macroscopic, low-velocity motion
problems. 95 years later, in 2022, Einstein is still not at peace in the
ground, because there is no locality in quantum mechanics, and the
"action at a distance" of quantum entanglement and "superluminal
speed" belong to quantum non-locality - cosmic matter superluminal
is a real existence.
Today, scientific historical reflection must revisit the
Michelson-Morley Experiment, a famous physics experiment
performed by Michelson and Morley in Cleveland in 1887 to measure
the difference in the speed of light between two vertical lights using a
Michelson interferometer. But it turns out that the speed of light is
the same in different inertial frames and different directions, thus
denying the existence of the ether (the absolute stationary referenceframe), thus shaking the foundation of classical physics and becoming
a beginning of modern physics - the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics has
clearly proved Einstein wrong with experiments! The purpose of the
Michelson Morley experiment was to test whether there was an
aether wind when the solar system was the frame of reference, and it
was found that on the ground, with the device as the frame of
reference, the speed of light was constant. The Michelson-Morley
experiment showed that the speed of light does not change on the
ground. Any object is in motion, so if the speed of light is not affected
by the frame of reference, it is measured that the speed of light
should be changed, and the speed of light is measured to be
unchanged, which means that light superimposes the speed of the
frame of reference, and this speed is given by the aether, and it also
shows that the aether on the ground moves in sync with the earth."
In 900, Lord Kelvin, in his famous speech "The Dark Clouds of the
19th Century over the Theory of Heat and Light Dynamics,"
mentioned that the edifice of physics had been basically built, and
that later generations of physicists only had to do a few piecemall
repairs, but under the sunny sky of physics, there were "two small
dark clouds." The first is the failure to prove the existence of the
aether, and the second is the mismatch between the theory and the
reality of blackbody radiation. One of these clouds developed
relativity, the other quantum mechanics. If it had been proved that
the ether existed, Einstein's theory of relativity would not have
emerged - Einstein thought that quantum entanglement, an
interaction at a distance, was inconceivable and violated special
relativity.
Einstein, along with his Princeton associates Boris Podolsky and
Nathan Rosen, proposed a thought experiment known as the EPR
paradox.
The EPR paradox describes particles A and B with spin 1/2,
starting with a total spin of zero. Suppose A particle has two possible
spins, | up > and | down >, then if the spin of particle A is | up >, the
spin of particle B must be | down > to maintain the population
conservation. If these two particles are facing opposite sides
Flying, farther and farther apart. Then, no matter how far apart
they are, they should always be related | up >| down, in order tomaintain the population conservation. If the two particles are
measured separately by an observer, Alice Bob. According to quantum
mechanics, as long as Alice and Bob have not made measurements,
every particle should be in some superposition, for example, | up >
and | down > with a 50% probability each. Then, if Alice measures A,
the superposition of A collapses in an instant, for example, to | up >,
and B must be | down > because of conservation. However, at this
time, the distance between A and B is extremely far, such as tens of
thousands of light years, according to the theory of quantum
mechanics, B should also be | up > and | down > each half of the
probability, why can it always choose | >? Unless there is some way of
"messaging" between particles A and B in a timely manner? Even
assuming they could sense each other, that would seem to be a signal
at a very short distance! This action at a distance contradicts the
theory of relativity that the speed of light cannot be surpassed. This,
then, constitutes a paradox.
Einstein believed that such a phenomenon would never occur,
and called it spooky action at a distance, saying that the problem was
that "quantum mechanics is incomplete." Einstein hoped to establish
a more general theory of local realism to make up for the
shortcomings of quantum theory and eliminate the action at a
distance.
Bohr believed that this super-distance action must exist, and
quantum mechanics is complete; The quantum world is non-local. As
a result, the great debate between Bohr and Einstein continued
across the century in 1926:
In 1964, John Bell, a follower of Einstein, defined an observable
measurementIn 1969, John Clauser, then a graduate student at
Columbia University, along with Michael Horne, Abner Shimony, and
Richard Holt, Bell's 1964 mathematical theorem was translated into a
very
specific
experimental
prediction
by
using
the
Clauser-Horn-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality.
In 1972, when John Clauser was already a postdoctoral
researcher, he and graduate student Stuart Freedman were the first
to experimentally show that two particles far apart could become
entangled.
John Clauser went on to conduct three more experiments to test
the foundations of quantum mechanics and entanglement. Each newexperiment confirmed and extended his results.
In 1982, Alan Aspect et al. at the University of Paris XI improved
the Clauser and Freedman Bell Theorem experiment by using the
entanglement of polarization states between pairs of photons
radiating from a cascade of calcium ions, and the experimental results
violated Bell's inequality.
In 1998, Anton Zeilinger et al. at the University of Innsbruck in
Austria completed the experiment of "Bell inequality", using
entangled photon pairs generated by parametric downconversion in
nonlinear crystals to partially eliminate localized leakage
Hole, the experimental results have decisive significance.
Subsequently, over the years, we still verified the Bell inequality
through a variety of entangled example pairs, because of the
imperfections and loopholes in previous experiments, such as
localization loopholes and measurement loopholes.
The so-called local loophole means that the corresponding time
of the association between entangled particles exceeds the speed of
light, such as the detection of one particle, the result of the other
particle is immediately obtained, but if the distance between the two
particles is not long enough to prove that the propagation time
through the speed of light is much longer than the experimental
result of another photon. This is a local vulnerability.
The measurement loophole is because the detector efficiency is
not 100%, so it can be understood that the detected particles all
violate the Bell inequality, and the undetected particles do not
violate.
In 2015, Ronald Hanson's group at Delft Technical University in
the Netherlands reported that they had completed experiments to
verify Bell's inequality in a diamond color center system: to avoid the
localization loophole, simply place two diamond color centers in two
laboratories 1.3 kilometers apart. The time required for direct optical
communication between the two color centers is about 4.27
microseconds, and the time to complete an experiment is 4.18
microseconds, which is 90 nanoseconds less than the optical
communication time, so the local vulnerability is solved. In addition,
the measurement efficiency of the color center is as high as 96%, and
the measurement hole is also plugged. They claim to have achieved abug-free test of Bell's inequality, supporting quantum theory with
96% confidence (2.1 standard deviations), thus falsifying the local
hidden variable theory. In practice, they use entangled photon pairs
and entangled exchange technology to realize the entanglement
between diamond color center electrons.
】
Nobel Prize
Interpretation | Xue Peng: From Einstein's Disbelief to Ghostly Action
at a Distance come true
The universe faster than the speed of light is a unique real
existence in quantum mechanics, and the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics
highlights that the "faster than the speed of light" that Einstein did
not recognize in the pyramid of human science has been
experimentally proved to sublimate and leap to the top of the
pyramid! - "Quantum entanglement" will completely change the
world of matter and soul - body and soul are the unique existence of
the unity of life and free quantum properties, the soul is often free
outside the body in the sky, just like theology, the soul can cross over,
miraculous... But ah! Body and soul are a whole biological
phenomenon, like "quantum entanglement", which also originated in
the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago! As a result, humanity has entered
the strange "six realms of holistic biology"...
The origin of the whole life of the Big Bang The Greek prophets
had the foresight to create the whole life
And the expansion of modern medicine "integrity" is an
indisputable fact
Holistic biology, like all human sciences, began with the miracle
civilization of ancient Greece and continues to the present day: the
ancient Greek biologist must be the philosopher Anaximander (610
BC - 545 BC), the ancient Greek materialist philosopher, is said to be
the "first man in the history of philosophy" Thales's student, the most
important biologist. It was asserted that the first primitive animals
lived in the sea, which initially covered the entire Earth. When the sea
fell, some organisms were able to adapt themselves to the new
environment and became land animals. Since Ptolemy's "point to
point" revealed the quantum properties of planets in the universe and
pioneered mathematical calculations, empirical observations and
scientific research that have workedThe ancient Greek principle of scientific simplicity became the
mainstream, Aristotle (384 BC - 322 BC), history says, the father of
human biological science; He has written many volumes of Zoology,
and has spent his life observing and studying the structure, habits and
growth of animals and the deformation of various insects, the
reproductive habits of eels, the embryonic development of bowfin
fish, and so on... He described hundreds of animals and established
the first zoological theory of human science. Hippocrates (460 BC --
370 BC) was a physician in the Pericles era of ancient Greece,
respected by the West as the "father of medicine", the founder of
Western medicine, put forward the "humoral theory", became the
founder of Western medicine, and left the "Hippocratic Oath" for
mankind is the ancient Greek professional ethics of Hippocrates
warning mankind. Until the modern medical ethics Canon! Claudius
Galenus (129-199), the second leading medical authority after
Hippocrates, devoted his life to the anatomy of medical practice,
wrote more than 500 medical books, and developed the concept of
personality types based on the ancient Greek humoral theory. His
main works are Temperament, Instinct, and Three Treatises on
Natural Science - the life science theories of the ancient Greek
scientific masters form the core of modern human "whole life
science" theory around 400 BC, The great philosopher Plato's theory
determined that "the earth is a huge living organism" - this is the
source of the human science "holistic biology"! Ancient Greek
mythology: The earth is the incarnation of the goddess Gaia, the
mother of the gods, is the highly respected and prominent god of all
gods, Gaia was born in the crack (chaos), is the first super primitive
god, marking "conflict and chaos from the mother of all gods Gaia, it
is the great mother God gave birth to all the gods of the light
universe." In her we see both creation and destruction, order and
chaos, and in general darkness and chaos are her essence." - Quote
from "Theogony"... "We see both creation and destruction, order and
chaos," Copernicus's 1453 Treatise on the Operation of the Celestial
Bodies showed the grand blueprint of the grand cosmic system. Next,
German astronomer Kepler (1571-1630) published the "Three
planetary laws" of cosmic stellar harmony between 1609 and 1619,
establishing the law of overall cosmic planetary harmony:
One: The orbit of the planet is elliptical, and the star is in anelliptic center (focus). Two: The line between the planet and the star
(vector) sweeps the same area per unit time.
Three: the orbital radius of the planets in the solar system
R(ellipse axis) cube is proportional to the square of the planetary
operation period T, that is, R^3=kT^2 Kepler constant k=3.354*10^13
m ^3/ s ^2.
Kepler's third law comes from the broad spectrum application of
the intelligent force in the Big Bang:
(a) By measuring the rotation period and semi-major axis of the
body, calculate the mass of the double star and estimate the mass of
the central object;
(2) By the orbital period of two planets moving around the same
central body, the average distance between the two planets and the
central body is calculated. (Because the actual orbit is elliptical, the
average distance is used).
(3) In the star-arrow separation problem, the ratio of the
semi-major axis of the star-arrow moving trajectory is calculated by
the ratio of the elliptical motion period of the star and arrow.
(4) Kepler revealed the secret of the harmony of the whole life
system of the big universe system
Kepler lamented that "Copernicus did not perceive the wealth
that lay within his grasp." Because Copernicus knew that several
circles could be combined to produce ellipses, he never used ellipses
to describe the orbits of celestial bodies, and continued Ptolemy's
epicycles, ignoring a completeness and rigor formed since the big
Bang - the big universe corresponds to the small universe of the
human body. In 1628, Harvey's "Theory of Blood Movement"
proposed a "small universe system". Harvey was very excited and
eulogized: Ah! Little universe system The sun in my heart! --
Pioneering the whole human body biology! ...
In this way, the sun in the mind of the small universe system and
the big universe system were integrated into the birth of the big Bang
"whole life"; In the 1960s, James Lavrov developed the hypothesis of
a "two-life universe" based on ancient Greek mythology. It's called the
Gaia Hypothesis. According to James, there are many different
definitions of life, and different times have different definitions of life.
There are philosophical definitions, biological definitions, artificialintelligence definitions, and so on. James said that the ability to use
energy to stabilize the internal environment is a universal attribute of
living things. According to this, the Earth can also be called life. French
physiologist (July 12, 1813 - February 10, 1878), one of the founders
of modern physiology. The concept of inner and outer environment
was put forward in Introduction to Experimental Medical Research,
which completed the historical transformation from traditional
empirical medicine to modern medicine. Bernard's law of the internal
environment states: "There are two environments, the external
environment, in which the organism lives, and the internal
environment, in which the various parts of the body's tissues live."
The processes of life do not take place in the outer environment, but
only in the inner environment of the liquid phase. The internal
environment of this liquid phase is made up of circular fluids that
surround and bathe all the anatomical components of the tissue."
Here, the "internal environment of the liquid phase" inherits the
Hippocratic humoral theory and conforms to Lavrov's "being able to
use energy to keep the internal environment stable is a universal
property of living things", and also becomes the first expression of
Schrodinger's "What is life" - "life lives on negative entropy" law - we
integrate these theories together. It is a collection of interpretations
of the modern "whole life science" of the universe and earth! -- Lewis
Thomas, a member of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States, in his profound summary of clinical testing in the
History of Medical Lessons, warned earnestly: The beginnings of
modern medicine have traditionally been dated to the mid-1920s and
1930s, marked by the entry of sulfonamides and penicillin into the
pharmacopoeia, and revolutionary forces in medical practice are
often attributed to these events. That's what it looked like at the time.
Medicine has been turned upside down, revolutionized. Many, many
incurable diseases in the past found cures at that time. There is a
cure... Almost overnight, the flowers blossomed; Some of the most
common and deadly human diseases -- lobed pneumonia, meningitis,
typhoid fever, tuberculosis, various forms of septicemia -- can be
treated instantly with antibiotics." ...
But ah! Peter Brooksmith, in "Future Disasters", boldly predicts
the coming of "superviruses" (usually strains resistant to two or more
antibiotics, known as "superbugs"); Brooksmith said, "With AIDS andother diseases ravaging the world, there is a terrible global epidemic
New trends in disease catastrophes: for example, polio, which
had escaped people in 2004, broke through the immune sugar
The "white plague" of tuberculosis has also re-spread on a large
scale in the world, and has become the largest killer of infectious
diseases in today's country. The 2004 South Asian bird flu has not
been completely eliminated, and 255 people were reported to have
been infected by Marburg hemorrhagic fever in 2005 until April 17.
233 deaths, with a mortality rate of more than 91 per cent "... There
are no medicines, vaccines or remedies for many diseases in the
world... Facts have proved that in the face of the brutal
three-year-long global pandemic of the new coronavirus that came
out of the blue in December 2019, scientists are still helpless, and can
only "mysteriously disappear" by relying on the continuous mutation
of the new coronavirus itself, the mutation of the virus, the reduction
of Omicron and the common cold - this is the exact proof of the
integrity of the virus!
17, the American Academy of Sciences, clinical expert Thomas on
the human body and the universe of life on Earth
Holistic summary and profound prophecy of the Gaia Hypothesis
The crux and lesson here is the totality of life in the universe and
on Earth, as Thomas once concluded:
"I believe the record to date tends to support that hunch. The
most complex diseases I know of, involving many cells, many tissues,
and many organs, are stage III syphilis, chronic tuberculosis, and
intractable anemia. In each case, at least five major organs and tissues
are involved, and each organ, each tissue seems to be affected by
many environmental factors. Until they were scientifically evaluated,
each was considered to be what we now call a "multifactorial" disease;
They are too complex to allow one to consider any single
pathogenesis." Thomas's lifetime clinical scientific research proved
that "the task of this whole is to maintain the benign development of
all its members" and that life on Earth in the universe is an indivisible
whole...
In his 1979 book The Gaia Hypothesis: A New Understanding of
Life on Earth, Lavrov concluded: "The Earth is a giant symbiont of all
living things and minerals together, and symbiont means a union ofliving things that benefits all parts, and the property of this
superorganism is to maintain a state that is as favorable to life as
possible through negative feedback mechanisms." In other words,
Lovelock believes that the earth should be regarded as an
interconnected whole of various parts, and the task of this whole is to
maintain the healthy development of all members, and scientific
experiments have proved the prediction of the ancient Greek
philosopher Plato "the earth is a huge living organism" in 400 BC! Let
us put Plato's prediction and Lavrov's scientific experiments into the
13.8 billion year big Bang "singularity" of the universe, we can witness
the conclusion of the origin of the whole life of the big Bang universe
- the Big Bang theory believes that the universe originated from an
extremely dense, extremely hot "singularity" about 13.8 billion years
ago, this "singularity" occurredThe Big Bang proves that quantum
entanglement refers to two or more particles in entangled states in
quantum mechanics, some of which behave as if they were a whole
even when separated by great distances. In other words, quantum
entanglement refers to two or more particles separated in space. Due
to some interaction, the information or physical properties possessed
by each particle become the overall characteristics and cannot be
separated, which is why it is called "entanglement". The more basic
level of "entanglement" represents an inseparable whole and an
implied order. On top of this comes the order of our interpretation of
the empirical universe, quantum entanglement, which is when two
separated particles or multiple particles interact with each other,
because the properties of each particle have been combined into a
whole property, it is impossible to describe the properties of each
particle.
Dating back to 5000 years, the ancient Greek philosopher
Aristotle first thought about the connection between sunlight and life,
which is the real history of ancient Greek civilization; No one expected:
Hawking's big Bang universe is derived in the modern universe,
originated about 13.8 billion years ago a singularity, this singularity
infinitely heavy infinitely small, and later this singularity exploded,
and then formed today's universe!
Here, the key to Hawking's Big Bang theory is "singularity" and
"big Bang"; A point with infinitely large density and infinitely small
volume. It exploded at this point 13.8 billion years ago, eventuallyforming today's universe, which is about 96 billion light-years wide -
so the sun was born in the big Bang, and it was the sun that incubated
the universe
Is the ball alive? !
The Big Bang confirms that everything grows by the sun but is in
the same universe as the mainstream of modern science
There are serious contradictions in the cosmic timeline but the
sun was born 10 billion years ago
The sun shines and has not changed for ever - yet modern
science says the Earth is only 4.6 billion years old? In fact, the solar
system of the universe has a diameter of 1.392 million kilometers, and
the sun is on average 149.6 million kilometers from the Earth, so the
sun can still illuminate every place and every inch of the Earth so far
away. It's a miracle! The microbial fossil evidence is 3.7 billion years
old - a huge contrast to the 13.8 billion year timeline of the Big Bang -
because all known scientific writings are from ancient Greece:
Archimedes, for example, has more than 10 mathematical works,
most of them in Greek manuscripts. His work focused on quadrature
problems, mainly the area of curved edges and the volume of curved
cubes, in a style heavily influenced by Euclid's Elements, first setting
up a number of definitions and hypotheses, and then proving in turn,
as a mathematician, He wrote "On Spheres and Cylinders",
"Measurement of Circles", "Quadrature of Parabola", "On Spirals",
"On Cones and Spheres", "Calculation of Sand" and other
mathematical works. As a mechanic, he is the author of "On the
Balance of figures", "on floating bodies", "on levers", "Principles" and
other mechanical works. The history of science says that the man who
can push (pry) the earth - Archimedes.
Archimedes (287-212 BC) was an ancient Greek physicist,
mathematician, and founder of statics and hydrostatics.
Apart from the great Newton and the great Einstein, no one has
made such a great contribution to the progress of mankind as
Archimedes. Even Isaac Newton and Albert Einstein drew wisdom and
inspiration from him. He was "the ideal embodiment of a theoretical
genius and an experimental genius in one place," and the likes of
Leonardo Da Vinci and Galileo held him up as their role model duringthe Renaissance.
Then there is the scientific legacy of Aristotle, the great collector
of Greek culture and science:
Aristotle (384-322BC.) was the most famous philosopher and
scholar of ancient Greece. He summarized the results of the
development of philosophy in ancient Greece since Thales,
distinguishing philosophy from other sciences for the first time, and
initiating independent studies in logic, ethics, political science, and
biology. His academic thought had a great impact on the development
of Western culture and science.
The founder of geometry - Euclid
Euclid (c. 300BC.) was one of the greatest mathematicians of
ancient Greece. At the invitation of King Ptolemy (364-283 BC) around
300 BC, he went to Alexandria under the rule of Egypt, where he
worked for a long time in teaching, research and writing. He wrote
many works on mathematics, astronomy, optics and music, and is
best known for his magnum opus, The Original Text, which was
originally 13 volumes and was supplemented by two volumes. The
original manuscript of this work has long been lost, and what exists is
a revised edition by Scion at the end of the 4th century and a Greek
manuscript found in the Vatican library in the 18th century. This is the
oldest surviving mathematical work in the Western world and the
earliest example of a deductive mathematical system using axiomatic
methods for 2,000 years. De Morgan once said, "Except for the Bible,
there is no book like the Original."
It was read by so many people and translated into so many
languages. From 1482 to the end of the 19th century, more than
1,000 editions of the Original were printed in all languages. During
the reign of Wanli in the Ming Dynasty (1607), Xu Guangqi and the
Italian missionary Matteo Ricci translated the first six volumes into
Chinese and published them under the title "Geometry Elements",
which is how the mathematical term "geometry" came from.
Geometry Elements is the first Western mathematical work translated
in modern China.
"Copernicus in the Hellenistic Age" - Aristarchus.
Aristarchos (310-230BC.) was born on the Aegean island of
Samos and studied at the Athenian Academy. He was not only a subtleobserver, but also a gifted theorist. He had a different view of the
universe. He believed that the sun and the stars were stationary, that
the earth and the planets revolved around the sun, and that the earth
rotated once a day on its own axis.
"The father of geography" - Eratosthenes named "geography",
since then mankind has geography!
Eratosthenes (275-193 BC.) was born in cyrene (in present-day
Libya), a Greek colony in northern Africa. He received a good
education in Cyrene and Athens and became a learned philosopher,
poet, astronomer and geographer. His interests were varied, but his
achievements were mainly in geography and astronomy
In fact, humans have existed in parallel universes since the
beginning! ... The political system of ancient Greek civilization was
"city-state system", in which each city master was relatively
independent, similar to the vassal system of Zhou Dynasty in China.
The demise of Athens could not be said to have followed the demise
of ancient Greek civilization. Instead of the name of Ancient Greece,
the Alexander Empire and the Ancient Roman Empire replaced it, but
Macedonia was actually one of the city-states of Ancient Greece. In
fact, Ancient Greece, Alexandria and ancient Rome are just like the
alternation of dynasties in China. Although the name of ancient
Greece is no longer used, its civilization inheritance is the same. In
fact, Alexander and the Ancient Roman Empire also inherited and
developed ancient Greek civilization, and their philosophical research
is also in the same line. It is the inheritor and promoter of civilization.
The disappearance of ancient Greek civilization actually began
with the fall of the Roman Empire. After the fall of the Roman Empire,
Europe fell into disunity, and Attila the Hun, known as the Scourge of
God, invaded the west, causing Europe to fall into a long period of war,
and the ancient Greek civilization lost its inheritance. Religion is most
interesting in times of war, after which the rise of Christian theological
civilization, theocratic Christianity ruled Europe, replacing the ancient
Greek civilization that disappeared. A single war may not end the
ancient Greek civilization, but can only last hundreds, even thousands
of years! ...
In fact, in 1915, Einstein's theory of relativity did not overturn
most of the scientific system established by Newton, saying that
Newton's laws of motion no longer hold when they are outside thescope of classical mechanics or applicable conditions such as particles,
inertial reference frames, and macroscopic, low-velocity motion
problems... That's just a twist of the frame of reference; Similarly, this
contrast in the history of natural science, the 2022 Nobel Prize in
Physics is no exception to the experimental proof of the "Einstein
error", the violation of the Bell inequality and groundbreaking
quantum information science! In fact, all of it
Contrast does not affect the Gaia Hypothesis's confirmation that
"the Earth is seen as an interconnected whole of its parts." That is to
say, modern people believe that "the earth exists only 4.6 billion years,
microbial fossil witness in 3.7 billion years" and the contrast between
the sun was born 10 billion years ago in the big Bang time axis of the
universe "number" is also a reference system of cosmic time axis of
Superman imagined changes! - This is the "post-relativistic
understanding" of the history of science, the universe is about 93
billion light years, there are at least two trillion galaxies in diameter,
and the average galaxy is about two thousand similar solar systems.
This is all the result of post-relativistic cognition; Another example is
that the earth is just a cell in the universe, the Earth cell weighs about
60 trillion tons, and every day in the universe at a speed of 5,200
kilometers through the endless universe, but each of us does not feel
a little bit of the Earth is rotating every day... All these are the
historical necessity of the methodology of post-relativistic
understanding.
Looking at the timeline of the whole life science of the Big Bang,
Schrodinger's "Nature and Greek Science and Humanism" precisely
chooses the timeline of ancient Greek natural science as the
beginning, and develops to the 21st century. This period of scientific
history with the exact historical record of 5000 years of huge span of
scientific development miracle is rare! Throughout this period of
natural science research, we all start from the subtle natural
phenomena of thinking, experience, observation, research, and later
develop to experimental science are using this "steel method". As a
result, the great science of the century with multiple categories,
disciplines, complexity, and even inclusiveness has emerged - the
great physicist Schrodinger has uncommonly integrated physics intobiology, using his book "What Is Life?" Created the miracle of
integrating physical biology theories and emphasized that: [We have
inherited from our ancestors a strong desire for a unified,
all-encompassing knowledge. The name of the highest institution of
learning (university, the word "university" in English is the same as the
word universal) reminds us of the centuries when universality was the
only perfect measure. But the expansion in the breadth and depth of
the various branches of knowledge over the last 100 years has
presented us with a strange dilemma. It is clear to us, on the one
hand, that we are only at the beginning of the process of obtaining
certain reliable data to try to synthesize all known knowledge into a
unified whole; but, on the other hand, that it is almost impossible for
a man to command any more than a narrow specialized field of
knowledge. According to Schrodinger's strategic conception of "trying
to integrate all known knowledge into a unified whole", we apply the
"original creativity fulcrum" theory of Archimedes' famous saying
"Give me the fulcrum and I will move the whole earth". Try to
integrate the brilliant achievements of 5000 years of ancient Greek
natural science with the knowledge of modern natural science,
"synthesize all known knowledge into a unified whole", and use "the
Whole Life of the Big Bang" to show the brilliant 5000 years of natural
science of the universe as perfectly as possible. It achieves
Schrodinger's expectation that the world "syntheses all known
knowledge into a unified whole", highlighting the overall unity of
modern "quantum entanglement" science and spirit in the 21st
century!
Chapter 2 Lewis Thomas on "The Whole Science of Life"
I. The Lewis Principle
The famous American medical scientist Lewis Thomas, after a
lifetime of holistic medical practice, on the whole mechanism of life
theory of a large number of works, it is difficult to argue that the
common nature of human beings and social animals. "Fear of exkinin",
"Music of this World", "Talk of Taste", "Cetus", "Information",
"Computer", "Various Words", "Living Language", and especially
"Praise of Cellular Life" emphasize the importance of information
exchange among organisms as a whole, on the other hand, point outthe overall identity of human beings and other organisms. Unique
exposition of the theoretical mechanism of "holistic biology",
Thomas's classic treatise on the whole mechanism system of life:
"I believe that the record of the last half century establishes two
universal principles about human disease. Number one, you have to
know a lot about the underlying mechanism of the disease before you
can really take effective action, you have to know that it's the
pneumococcus that causes lobular pneumonia before you can think
about antibiotics, you don't have to know all the details, you don't
even have to know how the pneumococcus is causing the lung
damage, but you have to know where it is and it's making the
decision.
Every disease has a single key mechanism that overrides all
others. If you can find it and figure out how to deal with it, you can
control the disease. This generalization is difficult to prove and prone
to controversy, rather than a scientific statement. It might as well be a
strong hunch, but I believe the record so far tends to support that
hunch. The most complex diseases I know of that involve multiple
cells, multiple tissues, and multiple organs are stage III syphilis,
chronic tuberculosis, and intractable anemia. In each case, at least
three organs and tissues are involved, and each organ, each tissue,
seems to be influenced by many environmental factors. Until they
were scientifically evaluated, each was considered to be what we now
call a 'multifactorial' disease. It is too complex to allow one to
consider any single mechanism, but when all the necessary facts are
in hand, it is clear that by shutting down one thing -- Helicobacter,
tuberculosis, or that particular vitamin deficiency -- the whole set of
disordered and seemingly unrelated mechanisms can be shut down at
once."
Two general principles of Lewis-Thomas: the underlying
mechanism and the "multifactorial" influence of environmental
factors The essence of a single mechanism is the confirmation of the
wholeness of life; It is also the prediction of biological microecology
and clinical medical expression. Thomas stressed: "We know very
little about ourselves. We are ignorant about how we function, what
place we occupy, and most importantly about this vast, incredible
living system in which we are rooted as working parts. We don't
understand nature, not at all."These theories constitute the theoretical basis of "whole life
science".
The holistic life theory from "The Praise of Cellular Life" to look
at the whole and the mechanism - Thomas sees many things as a
whole, living and living system. A social insect colony is a living
thing,"The Praise of Cellular Life" on the "whole" history of life and
praise:
"But even so, if at the initial, local stage this transformation is a
coordinated, holistic and harmonious physiological process, one thing
remains to be explained: the permanent disappearance of
consciousness. Are we going to be confused about this forever?"
The coined word "holism" has always been used for concepts like
"superorganism." One wonders if that word might have deterred
some researchers. The word is indeed fearsome. General jan
christiaan smuts (South Africa, 1870-1950) coined the term in 1926.
At that time, it might be better to write it as wholism. wholism is fully
etymologically qualified, and in our century it would be secular
enough to survive. However, as it is written now, its future is
uncertain. The word holism appears in some scientific dictionaries,
but not in most standard English dictionaries. Its inclusion in the
addendum to the Oxford English Dictionary is important, but not
enough to ensure its survival. Or it will perish with the doctrine of the
superorganism, of which I cannot say a word. If a theory does not
develop on its own, it is useless to promote it. It is better to leave it
there."
"It may be that we are just beginning to learn to use this system,
and that our entire evolution as a species is almost entirely behind
us." Perhaps the thoughts we produce today and travel rapidly
between our brains are like the jokes told simultaneously at dinner
tables in Hong Kong and Boston, like the sudden changes in our
hairstyles, like all the love songs that are popular today. They are only
primitive stages of more complex polymeric structures, comparable to
the prokaryotic cells that floated in shallow depressions early in
evolution. Later, when the time is right, there will be a fusion and
symbiosis between those pieces, and then we will see the eukaryotic
thought, the offspring of the thought, the great coral reef where the
thought grows together.
Such a mechanism already exists and can undoubtedly work,although all products to date have been largely fragmented. But it has
to be said that, evolutionarily speaking, we have only been using our
brains for a very short time, only a few thousand years, whereas
human history may last for billions of years. For thousands of years,
the human mind has been scattered in patches all over the earth.
Such an exchange of ideas, perhaps with some regularity, dictates the
critical concentration and mass at which it can operate effectively. It is
only in this century that we have come so close to each other that we
can begin to merge on a planetary scale, and from now on that
process can move forward rapidly." That is to say, "whole", "system",
"mechanism" is the mechanism of the whole body.
Three, Thomas on the integral biology of the three inseparable
advantages
The Eulogy of Cellular Life
One idea is that swarming social insects are in some sense
equivalent to massive, multi-life organisms. These creatures have a
collective intelligence and an adaptive nature that is far greater than
the sum of their individual parts. The idea began in some papers by
the renowned entomologist William MortonWheeler. He coined the
term "Superorganism" to describe the organism. From 1911 to the
early 1950s, this idea was listed as one of the important ideas in
entomology and attracted the attention of many enthusiastic people
outside the entomology circle. Maeterlinck (M.) and Marais (E.N.)
have written several best-selling books, the basic idea of which is that
somewhere in the nest of ants and termites, there must be a spirit.
Then, somehow, the idea suddenly came and went. In the
literature that has proliferated in insect science over the past
quarter-century, it is barely mentioned, nobody talks about it. It's not
just that the idea has been forgotten; It seems that such a thought
cannot be mentioned, and it is embarrassing to mention.
It's hard to explain. That idea does not appear to be wrong, nor
does it conflict with any of the other more acceptable ideas. Simply
because no one could figure out what to do with such an abstract
theory. It occupied an important place in the intellectual world at a
time when entomology was just emerging as a powerful pioneering
science capable of solving complex and detailed problems. It hasbecome the paradigm of the new reductionism. The great idea that
individual beings might transcend themselves in their association with
a dense society was beyond the reach of new technology, nor did it
propose new experiments or methods. It is merely in the current state,
but is covered by a deciduous paper, and needs enlightening value
measurement to survive. And that's what's missing.
The coined word Holism has always been used for concepts like
"superorganism." One wonders if that word might have deterred
some researchers. The word is indeed fearsome. General Jan
Christiaan Smuts (South Africa, 1870-1950) coined the term in 1926.
At that time, it might be better to write it as wholism. Wholism is fully
etymologically qualified, and in our century it would be secular
enough to survive. However, as it is now written, its future is
uncertain. The word Holism appears in some scientific dictionaries,
but not in most standard English dictionaries. Its inclusion in the
addendum to the Oxford English Dictionary is important, but not
enough to ensure its survival. Or it will die with the superorganism,
I can't say a word about it. If a theory does not develop on its
own, it is useless to promote it. It's better to leave it there.
The problem, however, may be that someone has pushed it, but
in the wrong direction. By Wheeler's criteria, colonies of ants or
termites, bees, and social wasps might actually be superorganisms.
But for now, as far as insects are concerned, that's probably where
the information line ends. Perhaps, if you apply this theory to another
A social species or a more manageable species, that would make
things easier. There are species like that, like us.
There's something that's been bothering entomologists for a
long time. That is, we laypeople are always interfering in their affairs:
always using human behavior to provide an explanation for insect
behavior. Entomologists have taken great pains to explain to us that
ants are not little mechanical models of humans. I agree with them.
Nothing we know for sure about human behavior is likely to explain
what ants do. We should not concern ourselves with ants; that is a
matter for entomologists. As for the ants themselves, apparently, they
don't need our instruction.
That doesn't mean, however, that we can't use it the other way
around. With luck, for example, the collective behavior of ants mayhelp us understand our problems.
There are many possibilities here. But just think of a colony of
millions of ants descending to build a nest. Every ant worked
incessantly and compulsively, doing his part of the work to perfection,
without knowing what was being built elsewhere. In this way the ant
lives a short life, and the cause for which it works is eternal to it (three
or four percent of the colony dies every day; In about a month, a
generation of ants disappears, and the nest can last as long as sixty
years; If there is no natural disaster, it is never bad. In the midst of the
chaos, the ants worked with precision and concentration, staggering
past one ant after another, picking up twigs and mud, and arranging
them into exactly the right shape to keep the eggs and young ants
warm and ventilated. But in isolation, they're all weak and weak. In
this sense, there is only one human activity that is comparable, and
that is language.
We make language, generation after generation, for countless
generations, without knowing how it is made or what it will be like
when it is made, if it is ever made at all. Of all the things we do, it is
the most forcibly collective, the most genetically programmed, the
most unique to our species, and at the same time the most
spontaneous, and we do it with precision. It's a natural thing. We
have the DNA of management grammar, we have the neurons of
management syntax, and we must never stop. We move from
civilization to civilization, changing shape, making tools and cities here
and there, while new words stumble and crowd out all the time.
The words themselves are amazing. Each word is perfectly
designed for the purpose for which it is used. The old words and the
stronger ones are membranous, crammed with layers of different
meanings, like a poem made up of one word. articulated, for example,
was initially divided into small joints, and then unconsciously took on
the meaning of a sentence. Some words change gradually in everyday
use, and we do not know that the change has taken place until the
change is complete. The suffix -ly in some of today's adverbs, such as
ably and benignly, first appeared hundreds of years ago as a
substitute for like. Later, like after the pin grinding, became a suffix. By
a similar process, love-did (past tense of Old English love). And then it
became loved.None of these words were coined by anyone we know. They just
appear in the language when needed. Sometimes a familiar word is
suddenly seized upon to refer to something very strange: today the
word strange is itself such a word. Atomic physicists need it to
represent the properties of a particle that decays very slowly. Now,
such particles are called "strange particles," and they have a
"strangeness number[s]." We have come to regard the sudden
appearance of unfamiliar faces in such old and familiar words as
commonplace. This process has been going on for thousands of years.
A few of the words were coined by a few of our contemporary
solitarians-holism was coined by Smatz, Quark (quark particle) by
Joyce. But most of these words are exotic and ephemeral. For a word
to really become a tenable word, it takes a lot of application.
Most new words are derived from other words already in
existence. The creation of language is a conservative process: old
things are renovated and little is wasted. Every time a new word
stands out from the old word, the original meaning often lingers
around the new word like a smell, mysterious and indistinct.
The people who created Holism meant simply that they did not
mean the complete combination of several life units. Because it
seems holy, it implies the meaning of "biologically supernatural." The
word comes from the Indo-European root kailo, meaning whole,
which also means unhit or unhurt. Over thousands of years, it has
evolved into hail, hale, health, hallow, holy, whole, and heal, and we
still have these words in our minds. "Heuristic" is a more specialized
and single-purpose word, derived from the Indo-European word wer,
which means to seek. Later, in Greek, it became heuriskein, so that
Archimedes discovered the law of buoyancy and cried out Heureka!
There are two other loaded words from Indo-European: gene
and bheu. Every word is an anthill. We have constructed the concept
of everything from these two words. From the beginning, or from the
time there was a case, they meant that they existed. Gene means to
begin, reproduce, and bheu means to exist and grow. Gene, in turn,
became kundjaz (Germanic) and gecynd (Old English), meaning kin or
kind. Kind first referred to kinship, then to high social status, and then
to Kindly and gentle. At the same time, another branch of gene
became gens (gens) in Latin, and later gentle. It can also be described
as genus, genius, genital and generous. It then becomes nature (fromgnas ci), but still contains its inner meaning.
Just as gene evolved into nature and kind, bheu underwent
similar changes. One of these became bowan in Germanic and bua in
Old Norse, meaning to live and dwell, and then build in English. In
Greek, it became phuein, which means birth
To be born and to make grow became phusis, which is another
word for nature. Born again of phusis
physic, physic first meant natural science, then medicine, and
then physics.
These two words have evolved to the present day, and it is no
exaggeration to say that together they can encompass everything in
the universe. It's not a word you just look for. Nor can they be built
from scratch. They need to live a long time to be meaningful. C.S.
Lewis, discussing vocabulary, wrote: "Everything is an ineffable
subject." The word itself must show the internal mark of long-term
use; They must contain their own internal dialogue.
Over the years the words nature and physics, in their present
sense, have been linked by a kind of guesswork in our minds; At a
time like today, it's reassuring to know that. The other words that
surround them are confusing, but interesting to watch. If you let loose,
all these words blend together into something lovely and puzzling.
"Kind" means kinship, but it also means nature. Kind and gentle used
to be the same word, oh, my God, physical nature is nature,In 1937,
following Levov's guidance, Monoe switched to E. coli for
physiological research. In his experiments, he discovered that a
phenomenon called the "two-stage growth curve" marks the
beginning of the overall regulation of genes - growing bacteria with
various monosaccharides, disaccharides, or mixtures of them for
energy, and their growth rate is a function of the sugar concentration.
However, when Mono uses both glucose and lactose as an energy
source, the curve begins to rise, flattens out when the glucose runs
out, and rises again after a while. This is called a two-stage growth
curve,
Monod found that there is not only one enzyme in lactose
metabolism, but three enzymes involved in a collective behavior: all
three enzymes are activated by a common inducer, and Monod
deduced that the genes controlling the synthesis of these threeenzymes must be collectively adjacent on the chromosome; Because
Schrodinger's "negative entropy" determines energy, it can be
inferred that all life has a two-stage growth curve.
In September 1957, Mono went to the Virus Laboratory of
Berkeley University in the United States and the three scientists Paddy,
Jacob and Mono jointly carried out the "Pa, Ja, Mo experiment" that
is, the bacteria that can synthesize β-galactosidase (z+).
The bacteria (z-) that cannot synthesize the enzyme, the bacteria
(i+) that can synthesize the enzyme after the addition of inducers, and
the bacteria (i-) that can synthesize the enzyme without inducers, are
interbred (reciprocal cross), and the time of enzyme production and
the growth rate of enzyme activity are recorded to find out the
relationship between them. This is a series of experiments conducted
by Paddy, Jacob, and Mono, mainly by Paddy's actual operation,
which is both time and energy and very tedious labor. However, the
interpretation of this series of experimental results has led to a new
genetic theory - the theory of gene regulation. In essence, it is
completely the overall regulation of genes - the genes synthesized by
three enzymes must be the whole adjacent to each other on the
chromosome to mate (positive and negative cross), and the three are
indispensable. That is, the three structural genes that control lactose
metabolism (β-galactosidase gene z, β-galactosidase permease gene y,
and β-galactosidase transacetylase gene a) are controlled by the same
"switch" in adjacent locations on the cell's chromosomes, because the
production of these three enzymes is always related. And the
arrangement of these genes is cis-typed. The genes that determine
the switch are called "operator genes." The operator gene (o) is
located at the adjacent end of the three structural genes (z, y, a). The
operator gene and the structural gene form an operon - a complete
pattern of gene architecture - in the absence of inducers (such as
lactose) in bacterial cells, the repressor produced by the i gene
prevents the operation of the operator gene (o), mRNA cannot
transcribe the code on the structural gene, protein (enzyme) synthesis
cannot proceed, and so on. That is, all three structural genes (z, y, a)
are "off" - this is the whole "off"! However, after the addition of the
inducer (lactose), the repressor produced by the i gene binds to the
inducer and is inactivated, the operator gene is activated, mRNAtranscription begins, protein synthesis occurs, and the three enzymes
that break down lactose as a whole are produced. When the lactose
in the cell is broken down, the repressor returns to its active state,
preventing the operator gene from turning on again. This completed
the Genetic Regulation of Protein Synthesis, which was published in
the British Journal of Molecular Biology in 1961.
If Monod's overall "operon theory", especially the allosteric
theory of proteins, and Barbara McClintock's "jumping genes" are
unified with Thomas's "but even so, if at the initial, local stage, this
transformation is a coordinated, holistic and harmonious physiological
process", to think deeply about it, We can only get proof from
Barbara McClintock's global plate genetics experiment! ...
The third chapter of Mendel's classical genetics "whole plate
inheritance law" reveals the quantum nature of sex genes
I. Mendelian genetic matrix
The core of Mendel's classical genetics theory is the "genetic
matrix",
which
determines
the
three-dimensional
and
multidimensional form of gene proteins, and the nonlinear
arrangement and decoding of the gene digitalization stability
mechanism. As Schrodinger explains: "I use the word 'mode' of the
organism in the sense of what biologists call 'four-dimensional mode',
which refers not only to the structure and function of the adult
organism or any other stage of organism, but also to the whole
process of ontogeny from the fertilized egg to the adult stage when
the organism begins to reproduce itself." We now know that the
entire four-dimensional pattern is determined by the structure of a
single cell, the fertilized egg. We also know that it is essentially
determined by the structure of only a small part of the fertilized egg,
the nucleus. During the normal 'resting period' of the cell, this cell
nucleus usually appears as a network of chromatin scattered within
the cell. But in the very important process of cell division (mitosis and
meiosis, see below), it can be seen that it consists of a group of
usually fibrous or rod-shaped particles called chromosomes, which
number 8 or 12, or 48 in humans. But I should have written these
numbers as 2 x 4,2 x 6... , 2×24,...... And, in the common sense of
biologists, call it two sets of chromosomes. For while a singlechromosome can sometimes be clearly distinguished and identified
by its shape and size, here the two sets of chromosomes are almost
identical. As we shall soon see, one set comes from the mother (egg)
and the other from the father (sperm). It is these chromosomes, or
the axial skeletal filaments of chromosomes that we see under a
microscope, that contain all the patterns of an individual's
undeveloped and adult functioning in a sort of codebook. Each set of
chromosomes contains the entire code; In general, therefore, the
fertilized egg that forms the first stage of the future individual
contains two copies of the code. What is inherited is in fact the whole
(four-dimensional) pattern of the "phenotype", the visible and
obvious nature of the individual, which is copied for many generations
without appreciable change, and which remains constant for several
lifetimes (though not for tens of thousands of years), and in each
transmission is loaded with the material structure of the two cells
that combine to form the fertilized egg. It's a miracle." - What Is Life?
The first scientist to study the "four-dimensional pattern" of sex
was Mendel. Put forward the "genetic square matrix" rule:
In ten years, Mendel conducted experimental studies with pure
(pea) seed lines, which could simply be divided into the changes of
the seed sex of A single character in the reproductive process of 5-6
generations. As a rule it should be suitable for the experiments of
animal-plant hybridization in units of all traits of the whole species,
and for the natural reproduction of all life. That is, no matter how
many generations the AA produced by the combination of aa and Aa
can only produce AA, aa, Aa; It cannot produce individual species
other than AA, aa, Aa. That is to say, Mendel's law of "character"
separation and law of free combination are based on the
"four-dimensional model" of quantum entanglement properties of AA,
and the same sex cells as aa:
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 39The concept of "genetic square array" and the concept of "3:1"
life hypergeometric series of the Big Bang whole life science are put
forward.
Second, Mendelian genetic matrix 3:1 mathematical highlight
the Big Bang life half "four-dimensional model"
Reproductive deduction
This is a 4n "four-dimensional pattern" of a "genetic square" W
(negative entropy) :
In fact, the "mathematical mechanism" of the overall plate
genetic code is so simple. It's a binary of 0 and 1,
It starts with the finiteness of mathematical transformation, and
reaches the infinite changes of 0 and 1 of infinite sets. This is very
similar to the biological binary genetic mathematical transformation
of 1 and 3, 0 represents the vacancy in the natural series, can be any
natural number, 1 is the smallest odd number, is also the smallest
positive integer, 0 is less than 1, can also (can) be greater than 1,
which constitutes the infinite change of the computer's minimum
mathematical transformation mechanism. 1 and 3 should be natural
representations of the mathematical nature of biological evolution of
the simplest things. They all have the same properties: the smallest
finiteness to expand the infinite transformation mode, the infinite
transformation phase, the endless end of the circular number theory
mechanism characteristics. We can also verify this problem in a
genetic code table arranged in binary zeros and ones (Table 1).
Three from Mendelian 3:1 to Chagav base quantum gene
half-strain pairing implicant "integral plate.
Block inheritance law
Let's start with the following five English letters, and first look at
the meaning of the five English characters A, T, U and C, G: C=
cytosine deoxyribonucleotide U= uracil nucleotide T= thymine
deoxyribonucleotide A-adenine deoxyribonucleotide J-purine
昤
Deoxyribonucleotides C, U, T, A, G are the smallest key letters that
make up the genetic code. Mathematical and Chagav's law of
data-subratio pairing. These five key letters can be divided into twogroups. A-t-u and C-G. Let's take these two sets of key letters and
transform them with Leibniz's binary numbers 0 and 1. For example,
O -- C: O -- C-g1 -- -A -- T -- U. By using the arrangement of the digits
obtained by the transformation and the relative arrangement of the
remaining digits in the table, a genetic code table with binary digits 0
and l is obtained. So we see that Mendel's genetic factor rule is
revealed again, we see that every three rows of code from the top
down, the second and fourth vertical lines from left to right are
exactly the same symbols. The fourth row is different, showing the 1:1
change rule of the group password (group). From the top down U, C,
A, G four groups of genetic code, each group of rows has such a strict
change law. In addition, from the top down, the symbols of each code
in the vertical lines U and A, C and G correspond to the same
interlacing lines. We compare this table with the Mendelian matrix of
genetic factors drawn in Chapter 9 of this book. It reflects the same
mathematical law as the relative change of the interlacing of square
matrices. J, K, L, M, N, 0, P, Q are the eight forms of digital symbol
encryption. Form 4 modules (boards). The transformation of the four
modules in the genetic code population (table) can produce 16 groups
of modules. Each module square in the 16 groups of modules has the
property of equal vertical and horizontal (up, down, left and right)
diagonal spacing. Each module is composed of 4 groups of cipher
squares. The code consists of 3 bases and 1 phosphate. This forms the
mathematical basis of the genetic square 3:1. According to the
genetic square (Figure 8) 3:1 rule, modules produce recessive and
dominant sex. Their global interspacing (under and left and right) is
diagonally separated, resulting in the recessive and dominant global
interphase (intergenerational) heritability of the global module. In
other words, life inheritance exists in the unit of genetic code, but
also exists in the unit of large and small squares of genetic code
modules of individual inheritance and the whole of modular
inheritance. Both implicit and explicit cryptography have their own
"matrix" linkage effects. So the genetic code is governed by the
genetic matrix. Heredity has its own internal "matrix" method, it
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 41
It constituted the mechanism of species restriction. So thecomputer is a mathematical infinite combination of species constraint
mechanisms
Artificial reproduction is the mathematical application and
reproduction of biological intelligence. - From The Fulcrum of Your
Innovation (68 pages), Science Popularization Press, 2003
Scientific experiments have completely proved that "the genetic
code is governed by the genetic matrix." Heredity has its own internal
'array' method: From the scientific experiment of McClintock's
discovery of the transfer factor, it can be seen that the "jumping
gene" is a phenomenon that can only appear during the maturity of
corn kernels, and its essence is the consistency of the overall life of
Linnaan species with the overall speciality unchanged and
Schrodinger life forever dependent on the "negative entropy" survival.
The significance of the DNA sequence is not only that the DS-AC
regulatory system reveals the whole of life, but also that it reveals
another "whole jump" arrangement expression of the genetic code,
which is a breakthrough to the overall shape of the double helix linear
DNA arrangement. This can be further demonstrated by Keynes's
directional variation. Barbara McClintock, author at the time of "The
Origin and Behavior of Maize flare-prone Sites" and "Chromosome
Structure and Gene Expression," stressed that "the operon model is
very similar to her DS-AC system." In the 1970s, due to the Monogene
holism's research on the overall control of genes attracted people's
new understanding of the whole "jumping gene", the linear gene
confirmed that the genetic code could not change the existence of
the overall plate genetic code, so as to scientifically explain the
widespread existence of the overall mobile genetic factors called
transposable factors in organisms. It further illustrates the overall
connotation of the phenomenon of "jumping gene" in the whole plate.
In 1983, McClintock was awarded the Nobel Prize in recognition of his
contribution to the discovery of the "holism of the jump factor".
Jumping genes are another form of holo-chain holotype
produced by mutations, genes can be transmitted linearly between
bacteria, transposons can also be transferred as a whole "jump"
between other species, not only can transposons jump within the
genome and between the genome, but chromosomes themselves
sometimes completely spontaneously rearrange themselves as a
whole. This has something to do with environmental stress.McClintock's experiment of using X-ray irradiation on corn to induce
the overall mutation of the "jumping gene" color spots in corn brings
us back to the nature of the environment, including the
micro-environment and the internal and external environment of the
"micro-ecology" that produce the mutation. This is essentially the
same as Muller's use of X-rays to induce global mutation (death) in
mice; The difference is that McClintock found the overall jump
phenomenon of a gene-DNA sequence, the overall reorganization of
gene arrangement caused by insertion, and the overall death law of
organisms caused by "microecological variation" that induces
biological trait variation or mutation. Unfortunately, the "overall
jump" phenomenon of genes can never be seen by human eyes,
leading to Muller's conclusion of "mutational death". The "biohazard"
overall disaster that detonates the whole process of microecological
variation and death! ...
Four decrypts the whole block heritage code
We read the book "To give you the Fulcrum of Innovation" over
and over again, read it carefully, and suddenly found the key to crack
the "whole block heritage code", in the lines of this book. It can be
seen that this decryption key, broken into several fragments,
interspersed in the book is not related, and very inconspicuous page
numbers, hidden very deep, not carefully studied, difficult to crack.
They only talk about a few words without a head without a tail, so
that people can not see the classical theory of the rules, only broken
mysterious and difficult gray, can be said5, we from the book page
number plate gene mathematical change of the mathematical
formula is □ ×4, we expand the formula □ is the mathematical matrix
of Mendel's use of 3:1 3:1 (3:1) 4=3×4 ×4 (n is the natural series 1, 2,
3, 4, 5,...) Obviously, this is the mathematical deformation law of
genetic reproduction of the whole body of life by one or several
expansion formulas. It reveals the miraculous effects of genetic
reproduction and extinction of plates in the existence of life. It
explodes with greater force than the Fibonacci series, forming a
powerful tendency in the spiral of life (positive or negative). In a very
short period of time, there are life outbreaks and mass extinctions
and mysterious disappearance of life natural phenomena. This is
strong Yanping successful prediction. The mathematical basis for the
mysterious disappearance of SARS in 2003 and swine flu in 2010. Weuse computer synthesis to create a three-dimensional model of the
genome of the whole plate to visualize the genetic code of the whole
plate.
The Q-J equation is deduced from the Mendelian genetic square
matrix
"From the above formula, we can see that a small square in the
square array Lu: is according to 3:1 mathematical law to produce
black black, crow (hybrid)." This little square is represented by our
mouth. Mouth X4: It is four small squares, and its ratio of white and
black crows is 12:4. Port X42 The ratio of white to black crows is 48:16.
And so on to 192:48, 786:1 92... They are 4 square, 16 square and so
on... From this geometric genetic proliferation change, it can also be
seen that in the process of changing the number of each level to a
higher level, the white crow (series) constitutes the base of the next
genetic square black crow (hybrid). Example 48:16, 48 is the base of
the next generation (square) 192:48, and likewise 192 (white) forms
the base of 786:1,92 (black). In order to
In this way, this law reflects the extremely strong genetic
reproduction function of the hybrid in the evolutionary process. This
is a fulcrum. It could explain the disastrous mutation of the East Asian
migratory locust, which suddenly, in a very short period of time,
multiplies to tens of thousands per square meter in a certain area,
which is the progression of this phalanx inheritance. This is
Malthusian population theory emphasizes the empirical growth of
population in geometric progression. Therefore, if we take a black
crow, once it can survive natural selection, it can become the leader
of the white crow population. Even if the black crow feather (white
trait) cannot be displayed in the next generation of hybrids, other
traits that are conducive to speciation evolution will also recessive
exist in the offspring of the hybrid, becoming an advantage of
speciation evolution. It plays a recessive role in specific evolutionary
superiority, and will suddenly appear in a future generation of hybrids.
This variation is long and latent, and is the result of specific
constraints.
This means that the black crow will become a positive factor in
the speciation evolution of the white crow, which is a generic traitshared by all hybrids.
The evolution of life is more completed by natural selection in
the struggle for survival, including the character variation and
heredity of the artificial selection process, and the advantages and
shortcomings of evolution are mainly reflected in the appearance of
the offspring hybrids produced by reproduction, "-" The Fulcrum for
your Innovation "Qiang Yanping, edited by Science Popularization
Press, 2003
This is how we use Mendelian genetic matrix to study and
deduce "black crow will become a positive factor in the sexual
evolution of white crow" and integrate 3:1 life mathematics and
Fibonacci series to deduce and deduce the Q-J equation.
Vi. Discussion on Fibonacci mathematics underlying the
"Four-dimensional model" reproduction "of Q-J equation
From the Mendelian 3:1 breeding change, it can be seen that in
the process of the change of the number of each level to the higher
level, the white crow (series) constitutes the base of the next genetic
square black crow (hybrid). Example 48:16, 48 is the base of the next
generation (square) 192:48, and likewise 192 (white) forms the base
of 786:192 (black). By analogy, this law reflects the extremely strong
genetic reproductive explosion of the hybrid in the evolutionary
process.
It revealed that the Fibonacci sequence was not the geometric
base of reproduction as Malthus's "Theory of Population" suggested.
Because:
A Fibonacci sequence 13, 21, 34, 55... It's done by adding some
natural number. It's a choice. Nature does not have such an artificial
natural sequence! Such as:
3x4 two twelve; Plus one, two, 13
Sx4=20;
Plus I, two, 21
8 x4 2 32; +2, 2, 34
13x42,52; +3 two 55......
B: 2n = 2, 4, 8, 16... The 2n geometric number base cannot
produce a sudden explosion of life or a sudden extinction effect.
C: Only W= ×4n conforms to Mendelian principles.
In fact, a law is an objective law that is proved by practice and
facts and reflects the development and change of things under certainconditions. A law is a theoretical model that describes the real world
in a particular situation at a particular scale, and may fail or be
inaccurate at other scales. No single theory can describe everything in
the universe, and no single theory is likely to be completely correct.
7. Q-J equation in the SARS epidemic big data application and
SARS epidemic verification
SARS cluster infection (law of global plate genetic reproduction)
mathematical formula
A suburb of Foshan, Guangdong Province, China. November 16,
2002, a village cadre Pang ×× suddenly suffered from a strange
disease, symptoms are fever, dry cough, high fever more than 38
degrees do not retreat, the lungs have shadows. At the same time,
discontinuity and continuity in different Guangnan regions, different
cities and counties; In ecological conditions that do not touch each
other, Guangdong 7 cities and counties (on November 16, 2002,
December 15, 2002, December 21, 2002, December 26, 2002, January
5, 2003, January 22, 2003, 1, 2003 In 76 days, 7 imported primary
homogenous cases were identified. This was later identified as
Atypical pneumonia. As we have already discussed, this is certainly
not the first (primary) case of SARS that has existed in the world. By
statistical analysis of the transmission mode of these 7 cases, we
found that SARS has the property of global plate genetic reproduction
(law), and the statistical data of its transmission proved that it was in
accordance with the mathematical formula of global plate genetic
reproduction (law) expressed in the J-Q equation. It is basically the
same as the mathematical formula of the infection of four cases in an
epidemic area in Singapore from February 20 to March 20. Look at the
chart below: Fundamental Theory of Global Life Sciences I (" The Law
of Global Plate Heredity - Big Bang Global Life ") 47
Chart analysis: (1) In the figure, there were 7 cases of the first
SARS patient in four cities and counties of Guangdong Province (A Jing
and Fan Xinde were not the first patients). Among them, 1 boss, 2
cadres, 1 driver, 3 cooks (workers). All were between 30 and 49 years
old and male. During the treatment period, there were multiple
transfers to hospitals (the same hospital also had records of transfers
to departments and wards). The close contacts (number of people) of
the infection all conform to the mathematical formula of the whole
plate genetic propagation law: J-Q= (3:1) ×4n. Pang ×× infected 4people, belonging to the A (12:4) gradient of J-Q, Huang ×× infected 8
people in the A (12:4) gradient of J-Q, Guo ×× infected 4 people in the
A (12:4) gradient of J-Q, Chen ×× infected 4 people in the A (12: 4)
Gradient, ××× infection 24 people in the J-Q B (48:16) gradient; Yellow
×× infected 6 people, in the A (12:4) gradient of J-Q; Boss Zhou
infection: ①, 8 people were in the A (12:4) gradient of J-Q; (2) 41
patients were infected with the B (48:16) gradient of J-Q, and (3) 103
patients were infected with the C (192:48) gradient of J-Q. (The above
number of infections are in no contact with each other. In different
places, cities (counties), hospitals occurred. This mathematical model
is exactly the same as the mathematical model of infection in an
epidemic area in Singapore: Miss A infective 21 people -- J-Q B (48:16)
gradient, Nurse B infective 23 people -- J-Q B (48: 16) Gradient, Ms. C
infected 23 people - J-Q B (48:16) gradient, all in the middle of (48:16)
24 people. D The elderly infect 40 people - the B (48:16) gradient of
J-Q. Overall infection of 107 people - C-gradient of J-Q (192:48) (see
figure). This has fully proved the scientific nature of J-Q mathematical
formula. (On April 10, during the outbreak of the epidemic, we
reported the theory of global plate genetic reproduction and the
mathematical equation J-Q= (4:1) ×4n to the leading Group of The
State Council for the Prevention of SARS and relevant hospitals. See
"Test Recipe"). This theory is originally from the book "To give you the
Fulcrum of innovation" - signed on September 10, 2001. The book
was published in mid-March 2003. See pages 83 --84. Gradient is an
inherent attribute of the genetic reproduction law of the whole plate,
a measure of the ecological energy aggregation formed by the
evolution of life, and a probability of the growth of the overall life
vitality. Its trajectory constitutes a broad spectrum of life positive
(negative) spiral growth. The law of genetic reproduction of the whole
plate is the instinct of reproduction and self-defense of any species
(individual) inherent mathematical characteristics of biological
organisms: ①, on April 10, 2003, we proposed microecological
therapy (see "the test") to prevent SARS. The essence of life is the
product of life, energy, balance movement and evolution generated
by the environment of micro-ecology (entropy). Any environment is
composed of infinite (infinitesimal micro-ecology) sets of
micro-ecology. Therefore, the change of the micro-ecological
environment determines the state of life movement, which is themicro-life state and the "butterfly effect" on the overall life
phenomenon. It can be seen that "first of all, the human
microecological environment of quasi-whole plate genetic
reproduction that was initially attempted to form by breaking the
SARS focus can effectively prevent the whole plate genetic
reproduction caused by the deep infection of SARS in the human
body." Therefore, we put forward: only "to control the overall plate
genetic reproduction of SARS virus, we have controlled the SARS
epidemic" (two patents). The three cases in the chart (Pang ××, A Jing,
and Zhou Boss) were all cured and discharged in a short period of
time due to unexpected physiological changes (diarrhea, vomiting,
and broken amniotic fluid) that changed the patient's life
microecological environment, thus changing and terminating the
overall plate genetic reproduction of SARS. Two thousand years ago,
Chinese medicine established the three major mechanisms of
microecological therapy: sweating, diarrhea, and vomiting. In fact, any
drug is to change the human microecological environment and
genetic ecology to achieve therapeutic effect. The "Bunsen channel
effect" provides this treatment with the (microscopic) physical
existence of the life movement (microscopic space) instinct.
Hippocrates said, "The patient's instinct is the patient's doctor, and
the doctor helps his instinct." Historical practice has proved that
microecological therapy is to treat the disease when there is no
disease (" no cure has been cured "), with small and broad prevention
and treatment concepts and treatment criteria, is the iron law
stipulated by the human microecology as a whole plate genetic
reproduction law!
On October 27, we came across the "SARS Clinical Cases and
Imaging Analysis" edited by Liu Shuang and Zhu Xiaoling. The book
discloses for the first time the number of three imported SARS cases
in Beijing. Only excerpts are as follows:
A. In early March, the first imported SARS patient in Beijing
infected 20 medical staff in two hospitals (2 family members died).
And Zhongshan City ××× infection 24 people belong to B gradient.
B. In mid-March, the second imported SARS patient in Beijing
infected 20-80 people in another hospital within 10-30 days. Same B
gradient as Boss Zhou's early infection of 18-40 people. Case C
infected 80 people, Boss Zhou infected 103 people, all belong to the Cgradient.
C. In early April, a university professor went to a hospital to see a
doctor and was infected with SARS, and then went to another hospital
to treat 19 people infected with the hospital (see page 16 of the
book). The number of cases is very similar to that of Singapore - Miss
A, Nurse B, and Ms. C - 21, 23, and 23.
From the mathematical comparison of SARS infection in
Guangzhou, an epidemic area in Singapore, and Beijing, it can be seen
that the number of infectious cases of the three first imported SARS
cases in Beijing (a hospital in three different regions) and the infection
mode of six cases in Guangdong and four cases in a disease area in
Singapore (the number of infected people) reached a surprising
similarity. This once again proves the accuracy and scientific nature of
J-Q equation. We also used the J-Q equation to predict the number of
West Nile virus infections in the United States during the summer of
2003 (mathematical model) with considerable accuracy...
The fourth chapter "The fulcrum of innovation in the Year"
Innovation theory 2003 edition of science
Historical review
Title: About "Mendel's classic genetics" the whole plate genetic
law "rich connotation" was first published in "Give you the fulcrum of
innovation" by Qiang Yanping (Science Popularization Press, March
2003) because of the time has experienced 20 years, the book has
been out of print; We then selected nine to eleven chapters; This is
the original five chapters as the content of Chapter 2 - Chapter 6 of
this book, to state and prove the origin of the basic theory of life
science and the discovery principle 20 years ago: we say that "To give
you the fulcrum of innovation" is the origin of the "whole plate
genetic law" of the whole life theory principle...
9. The Number theory of life born in the monastery (according to
the number of the original book chapters) :
The discovery of fulcrum is sometimes with a certain degree of
chance, but the process of establishing and proving the fulcrum often
has to go through arduous and lengthy efforts, sometimes even
requires several generations of hard work and sometimes
unacknowledged pain and suffering. Failure is common in scientificinnovation, therefore, long-term unremitting efforts, firm
self-confidence and determination to win are the necessary
prerequisites for a successful person. Dare to innovate, dare to deny
yourself is often the key to success. The development of science is in
the continuous discovery, continuous denial and continuous
innovation, mutual cross, mutual promotion of the development of
the forward. Scientific innovation is often accomplished through
interdisciplinary research and mutual citation.The mixing of theology
and science in the Middle Ages was a common phenomenon for
Europe at the forefront of scientific development at that time, which
was perfectly reflected in Copernicus, and science and theology and
monasteries were often mixed together. About the monastery we can
only get some perceptual knowledge from Hugo's "Notre Dame de
Paris", but it is a typical priest and servant infatuation with love, it is
more about eternal love. The Augustinian monastery of St. Thomas in
Blom, Austria, has left a different scene for the world, where we can
find the shadow and origin of biological number theory.
Since Plato mathematics had been separated from physics,
astronomy, and chemistry, as the origin of a certain branch of science,
but by the middle of the eighteenth century the connection between
the branches of science had become evident. The most typical
example is that Isaac Newton spent nearly 10 years studying
mathematics in order to understand the gravitational structure of the
celestial universe and analyze the extremely small space and time
interval. He wanted to find a handy mathematical tool to better
promote his research progress. Therefore, Newton, who took the
study of mechanics as his beauty, discovered and created the great
results of the famous calculus, a branch of mathematics, and later
provided the mathematical basis for the discovery and derivation of
the law of universal gravitation.
Although the physicist Hooke was the first to discover the inverse
relationship between gravity and the square of the distance, but he
did not make a sufficient mathematical proof, so the crown of
discovering the law of gravity in the lips fell to Newton's head. Irrick
Newton became the father of classical mechanics. The intersection of
physics and mathematics led to Newton's research in mechanics and
Calculus studies complement each other, which has been clearlyshown in its research results.
Let's start with the monastery of St. Thomas in Blom, Austria.
Today, the monastery of St. Thomas is no longer on the same scale as
it was then, but as the birthplace of genetic science, we can still see
that small and small experimental garden can be cultivated. It is this
200 square meters of original Austrian soil and a small greenhouse
that provide valuable research space for the hard work of Mendel, the
world's outstanding biogeneticist. Why was it possible to produce the
original genetic code of today's DNA organisms on this land?
Obviously, this cannot be separated from the persistent pursuit and
love of science by the abbot of St. Thomas, and his respect and
cultivation of Mendel.
In October 1851, Knapp recommended Mendel to study at the
University of Vienna, which was the first class in Europe at that time,
so that he could listen to the teaching of Doppler's famous teacher
and enter the scientific frontier of Dalton's atomism. History would
build a genetic Noah's Ark in the monastery of St. Thomas, providing
Mendel with the insect knowledge of Bonra and the plant view of
Wingtus. When Mendel returned to the monastery after two years at
the University of Vienna, Mendel was no longer the ordinary monk
without a high school 'teacher's qualification' who had entered the
monastery of St. Thomas. He was already a teacher of biology and
physics at the Higher Technical College of Blom, and Mendel's pea
hybridization experiments also began at this time, starting a long
career of teaching and scientific experiments from Mendel.
On the wall of Newton's house is a little poem with a
philosophical meaning: "Nature and its laws are hidden in the
darkness of the night..." He explicitly warns us that the fulcrum of
scientific discovery and innovation lies in the vast mysteries of nature.
A scientific discovery is like walking in the dark night, when the proud
son of science walks in the rough dark night, strong perseverance and
courage will inspire and ignite inspiration in the dark night to spark
innovative wisdom. Mendel's innovative fulcrum was born of his inner
spiritual shock, but what shook Mendel's mind was that he had lost
his' teaching qualification 'before going to the University of Vienna. At
this painful moment, firm faith and the relentless pursuit of science
squeezed out the three lights of wisdom in his heart, which, once
flashed in the dark night, would dissipate all the darkness andproduce a new era of science. This, of course, required conditions,
time, and hard work, and as soon as Mendel returned from Vienna to
the monastery of St. Thomas, he immediately threw himself into the
experiment of pea hybridization.
Why did Mendelian hybridization experiments use peas instead
of other plants? The selection of the pea as a plant hybrid is also a
successful fulcrum of scientific innovation.
During Mendel's time at the University of Vienna, he participated
in the Zoological and Botanical Society of Vienna, an academic
institution, and had too close contact with the famous botanist Cora
at that time, and had a deep understanding of the types of plants,
with today's perspective, if Mendel used any plants other than peas
to do his hybridization experiments, This kind of mathematical
biological variation law can not be found from Mendel's hands, this is
Mendel's pea mystery.
The book begins with the idea of a mindset shift, which means
not moving around and only following other people's ideas. To find
those secret: the dark night of science, to find the most critical
inflection point of scientific research, the most brilliant fulcrum of the
scientific pyramid, Mendel chose peas as a hybrid experiment
It is the basis for the success of his scientific experiments.
Genetics was just beginning at that time, and astronomers
before Tycho, like the researchers themselves, looked directly at the
stars of the universe. Biologists can only use the naked eye to directly
observe the changes in plant growth and carry out research on plant
genetics. This requires that the experimental plants have obvious
characteristics to facilitate the researchers to carry out direct
observation. Red and white flowers of peas, yellow green leaves, tall
and short plants and yellow mung beans with fruits, round wrinkles...
The special colors have a strong contrast and are easy to observe. In
addition, pea has strong vitality, relatively short growing period, the
male stamen of the flower encircles the pistille, removing the stamen,
cross-pollination is very convenient, and it is the most ideal hybrid
experimental variety observed by the naked eye.
It is said that Knight of the United Kingdom was the first person
to cross peas, and also the first person to find that there are some
gray dominant traits in pea seeds, and the genetic rule is revealed inthe second generation, and then Wilmoran, Nordan also found the
phenomenon of dominance and character separation in the process
of pea hybridization. However, they did not use mathematical
methods for research, ignoring the hidden internal laws of
mathematics and number theory in biology, which contains a fulcrum
of knowledge standing on the shoulders of giants. In fact, this mystery
lies in the hidden mathematical and number theoretic problems in
the inherent laws of biology.
The study of number theory began in the West since Aristotle,
and Archimedes, the most famous mathematical master in ancient
Europe, was the earliest expert in the study of large numbers. The
cattle problem he left behind has been solved by no one for more
than 2000 years. Archimedes was a mathematical whiz who both
spoke of using a fulcrum to move the entire earth and left the entire
Sicilian island unable to graze boundless cattle
Thinking in groups. It can be seen that the Western number
theory focuses on the reality, looking for the law of a certain object in
the order of specific numbers or for the first time; while the
mathematical theory of the East pays more attention to the
embodiment of reason in mathematics, looking for the law of
rationalizing numbers. As the ancient Chinese book of Songs says,
"Every thing has its own law." Guide people to develop a
mathematical (law) to view the nature of reason, this is the ancient
philosophers of good intentions. It can be seen that ancient Chinese
mathematics and mathematics were in a leading position in the world.
The ancient Zhoubi Suan Jing and Sun Zi Suan Jing are the earliest
summary of mathematical rationality in China since written records.
The essence of Oriental mathematics and western number
theory is similar. They all have a common digital origin, "one" is the
source of all things. So Mendel's pea mystery. Look for it in the simple
laws of mathematical number theory. That is to say, to look for
changes in biological traits, according to the laws of numerical laws to
restrict variation. This is to say that the change of the traits of plants
(peas), that is, the individual changes according to the simple rules of
mathematics are restricted, but also random. Because the individual
hybridization of any plant is long and must consume the researcher's
precious years, the unit of counting here is based on the year, which is
specified by the cycle of planting to fruit. In fact, Mendel'sexperimental planting took a full 10 years to reach what he
considered to be scientific conclusions. Without the idea of certain
success, without superhuman perseverance, without the spirit of
perseverance and loneliness, no one can complete such an
uninterrupted experiment every year. Especially when Mendel's
theory of experimental results was published in 1865, and it was not
recognized for a long time, Mendel still persisted in conducting
experiments and research. Perseverance, this is the valuable
Mendelian spirit.
To return to the riddle of Mendel's pea, we need to start with
Darwin's origin of species. Pea hybridization is artificial selection, but
why does it reflect the law of natural selection?
Because natural selection is superior to artificial selection, which
is a central part of Darwinian evolution, artificial selection and natural
selection are interrelated. Heredity is the process of selection, the
process of how species are transmitted, and the inheritance of
species is reflected through the individual continuity of species.
Therefore, the key is the intermittent and continuous relationship
between species and species: Similarly, species variation is also
through the individual existence of species, which determines that
individual genetic variation must be completed under the restriction
of species, that is to say, there is a unique species heredity that
cannot be violated, and this sex realizes its specific restriction in the
individual species. · This restriction mechanism is the essence of
heredity and the evolutionary mechanism of organisms. In the
process of biological evolution, under the premise of ensuring the
restriction of species, all other trait selection is free and random for
the individual development of species.
Whether this means that there is a "species restriction
mechanism" in biological evolution, the answer should be yes, this is
the inevitable continuation of species, in order to ensure the
continuation of a biological species, we must use mandatory
continuation norms to preserve the most basic core of species in the
individual, in order to ensure that it is not drowned in the mating and
reproduction with other individuals, bringing species extinction.
Similarly, the individual survival process of individual variation,
adaptation, selection and reproduction of biological individuals isrealized under the restriction of species, and without the restriction
of species, species individuals will be eliminated by species. Speciality
not only has the mechanism of preserving speciality in speciality
individuals, but also has the mechanism of eliminating individuals
beyond speciality. This mechanism is not simply heredity, but
coexistence of heredity and restriction. Heredity includes strict
speciality restriction, and this mechanism exists in the whole stage of
individual reproduction, reproduction, growth and development of
speciality individuals until the end of life. He resizes the production of
non-specific traits at any time, whether natural selection,... or
artificial selection is the selection under the specific restriction
mechanism. Through the species restriction mechanism, the heredity
of individual species is restricted in all directions and all weather.
The restriction of heredity to any mechanism is not
instantaneous, anytime, random, and the constant derivation of
biological species is not instantaneous, anytime, random. Once the
species mechanism is formed, it exists forever, and it restricts forever.
The species of any species has this characteristic. Mendel's pea
hybridization reflected the restriction mechanism of speciation.
Heredity can only be a part of the specific restriction mechanism,
Mendel showed that there are also specific restriction reproduction,
specific restriction variation and specific restriction selection. Species
separation and free combination under the specific restriction
mechanism of reproduction, transfer, variation, selection together
constitute the specific restriction mechanism, so as to ensure that the
dragon produces the dragon and the phoenix produces the wind.
Ensure that the individual of the species is not drowned, eliminated,
or exterminated in the process of mating and breeding with other
individuals. This kind of species restriction is also the reason why the
evolution of biological species can not reach the apex and can not
reach the perfection. This explains why the eyes of man are not as
sharp as those of the eagle, and are less well formed and sighted than
those of the fly and dragonfly. People's sense of smell is not as
sensitive as the dog's sense of smell, the height of the jump is not as
high as the flea (according to its own weight ratio), the function of
human running is not as good as the deer, and so on, that is, a certain
organ of advanced animals can not reach the point of biological
evolution. Because the human species restriction does not allow thehuman eye to choose the hawk-eye evolutionary model, the human
olfactory organ is also subject to the human species restriction, no
Even if this trait is superior to the human sense of smell by many
times, this trait is not allowed to exist in the combination of human
functions and other organ functions), similarly, the variation of human
legs cannot achieve the good running traits like Sika deer's four legs,
and naturally limits the jumping function of both legs. Therefore,
heredity is the heredity of species restriction, selection is also the
selection under species restriction, the natural selection of individuals
within the permissible range of species restriction, and fire selection
likewise cannot transcend species restriction. In the same way, traits
and variations are subject to species constraints, the variation of traits
of individuals who produce species within the scope permitted by
species constraints, the limitations of heredity, selection, variation,
traits, and reproduction of such species constraints. It restricts the
mutation of species, natural selection and use of the mutation can
only take place in the small variation of intergenerational, and the
small difference of traits in the small number of intergenerational
individuals. This lays down the three-to-one rule of Mendelian
inheritance, which explains why new mutants are often
overwhelmed.
In many species, rare and new mutants are often inundated in
the populations produced by normal interbreeding, and the main
reason for the extinction of intergenerational extinction is the specific
restriction mechanism. Take the rare red-eyed golden peacock of
tropical fish as an example, although he is the product of variation in
guppies, as long as it is raised in a tank with a group of ordinary
guppies, the variation of red-eye will disappear after generations,
making red-eye become black eye. Because when the red-eyed
golden sparrow mixed with the common guppy, the common guppy
species constraints, red-eyed golden peacock and guppy traits will be
limited by this restriction, rarely produce mating. Even if hybridization
occurs, the probability that the red-eyed golden guppy can maintain
its sexual characteristics between generations is only one-third.
Therefore, the first generation of hybrid red eye golden Guppies can
only decline by 1/2 degree of difference under the constraints of
common golden guppies, and will be submerged by black eye goldenguppies and become extinct after three or four generations. If, on the
contrary, some black-eyed Auropterygius were put into the
population of red-eyed Auropterygius, it would also become extinct
due to the species constraints of the red-eyed Auropterygius, and the
black-eyed Auropterygius were drowned by the species constraints.
This is not caused by the instability of hybridization traits, it is the
necessity of the specific restriction mechanism, and the heredity itself
is also strictly limited by the specific contract mechanism. Thus, the
free combination of heredity (in the process of hybridization) is the
free combination of individual traits of species under the condition of
speciation. Similarly, the separation of heredity (in the process of
hybridization) is also the separation of individual traits of species
under the condition of speciation. The mathematical expression of
this strict constraint is Mendel's discovery of the constant value of
three to one. Why is it three to one, not two to one, or four to one, or
five to one? Which number rules does he follow? 3 is the smallest odd
prime number, 1 is the smallest odd number, that is, the genetic
combination of hybridization of biological traits, is the smallest odd
prime number and the smallest odd number in the natural series of
3:1, and this ratio is only one and only one in the natural numbers.
This is biological characteristics. In other words, the character
separation or combination ratio of the second generation
hybridization must have the mathematics of the smallest odd number
and the smallest odd prime numberTo ensure the integrity of the
parentage 65 shape, like most viviparous egg cells in the embryo are 1,
and sperm cells are not small and 3 number ratio with it, the
characteristics of the parents are complete and the most basic whole
body, into the separation or selection of the whole process of
hybridization, and this ratio is based on the nature M:M ≈ 3: 1 figure
ratio is the most perfect, close to the golden ratio of the form
embodied in order to guarantee the perfection of life. Since nature
can find no other minimum odd prime number, and no other
minimum odd number, this numerical reason determines the
propagation of life, the minimum range of existence in code, the
specific safety of selection for variation, the operability of the specific
inheritance of traits, and the simple sequence of species
variation. · This is the embodiment of the principle of simplicity in the
process of life reproduction. The individual multiplication of species,which is the most basic component of species, does not produce any
essential difference, so as to realize the continuation of species. This
very difficult and lengthy biological natural engineering makes the
extinction of species very long, very difficult and even impossible,
which is the need for preserving the infinite extension of species life.
This, in turn, constitutes the mechanism of species-based restriction,
which is the secret of species-based mathematical contract.
The natural engineering of biological heredity is carried out by
the ratio of the smallest odd number and the smallest odd prime
number, why will it form infinite complexity and complexity, and there
is no absolutely the same individual existence of ever-changing
strange variables?
This can be inspired by the mathematical changes that make up
modern computers. At present, the function of the computer has
developed to an extraordinary magic, and it is widely used in various
fields of human science and life, but its mathematical mechanism is
so simple. It is the binary of 0 and 1, which begins with the finiteness
of mathematical transformation and reaches the infinite changes of 0
and 1 of infinite sets. This is very similar to the biological binary
genetic mathematical transformation of 1 and 3, 0 represents the
vacancy in the natural series, can be any natural number, 1 is the
smallest odd number, is also the smallest positive integer, 0 is less
than 1, can also (can) be greater than 1, which constitutes the infinite
change of the computer's minimum mathematical transformation
mechanism. 1 and 3 should be the natural embodiment of the
mathematical nature of species evolution in the simplest things. They
all have the same properties: the transformation mode of infinite
expansion with minimal finiteness, the phase of infinite
transformation, and the cyclic number theory without end
Characteristics of the mechanism.
We can also verify this problem in a genetic code table arranged
in binary zeros and ones (Table 1). Let's start with the following five
letters, and first look at the meaning of the five letters A, T, U, and C,
G: C= cytosine deoxyribonucleotide U diuridine nucleotide
T= thymine deoxyribonucleotide
A= adenine deoxyribonucleotide
G= guanine deoxyribonucleotideC, U, T, A, and G are the smallest key letters that make up the
genetic code. According to the mathematical and Chaghav law of
three-to-one pairing. These five key letters can be divided into two
groups. A=T=U and C=G. Let's take these two sets of key letters and
transform them with Zeibnitz's binary numbers 0 and 1. For example:
0 one =C=G, 1 one =A=T=U. By using the arrangement of the
converted numbers and the genetic code in the table, a genetic code
table encrypted by the binary digits 0 and 1 is obtained. So we see
that Mendel's genetic factor rule is revealed again, we see that every
three rows of code from the top down, the second and fourth vertical
lines from left to right are exactly the same symbols. The fourth row is
different, showing the 1:1 change rule of the group password (group).
From the top down U, C, A, G four groups of legacy passwords, each
group of ordering has such a strict change law. Moreover, from the
top down, the symbols of each password in the vertical lines U and A,
C and G correspond to the same interlacing lines. We compare this
table with the Mendelian matrix of genetic factors drawn in Chapter 9
of this book. It reflects the same mathematical law as the relative
change of the interlacing of square matrices. J, K, L, M, N, O, P, and Q
are the eight forms of digital symbol encryption. Form 4 modules
(boards). From the transformation of the four modules in the genetic
code population (table), 16 groups of modules can be produced. Each
small module square in the 16 groups of modules has the property of
equal vertical and horizontal (up and down, left and right) angular
spacing. Each module is composed of 4 groups of cipher squares.
Because the code depends on three bases, one phosphate. This forms
the mathematical basis of the genetic matrix 3:1. According to the
rule of genetic square (Figure 8) 3:1, modules produce recessive and
dominant attributes. Their global interspacing (up and down and left
and right) is diagonally separated, resulting in the recessive and
dominant global interphase (intergenerational) heritability of the
global module. In other words, life inheritance exists in the unit of
genetic code, but also exists in the unit of large and small squares of
genetic code modules of individual inheritance and the dual
inheritance of the whole module. Both implicit and explicit
cryptography exist in their own "matrix" system of linkage effects. So
the genetic code is governed by the genetic matrix.
Heredity has its own internal "matrix" method, which constitutesthe specific restriction mechanism. Therefore, the computer is the
artificial reproduction of the mathematical infinite combination of the
species constraint mechanism, and the mathematical application and
re-emergence of biological intelligence.
We can also look from other sides - a look at the development
trajectory of this pivot, perhaps more able to appreciate the long and
ruthless development of each discipline. In the summer of 1955, in
the botanical garden at the foot of Xiangshan, there is a small piece of
pale red lotus, attracting many extraordinary tourists, there are many
botanists, are looking at each lotus with amazed eyes, this lotus from
the surface looks nothing special, light pink flower
Basic theory of the whole life Science I (" The whole plate genetic
law - The whole life science of the Big Bang ") 59 petals, standing on
the lotus, · The huge lotus leaves like a Pu fan attached to the water,
holding the pink lotus particularly eye-catching, few people know that
this lotus implied an ancient mystery.
It turned out that this small piece of lotus was the result of
careful cultivation and care by Chinese scientists two years ago. The
seeds of this lotus were thousand-year-old lotus seeds found in the
underground peat layer of Cangzitun Village, Xinjin County, Liaoning
Province, three years ago. When they were found, the skin of these
lotus seeds had become very hard under the action of geological
deposition, like a small iron egg, which could not be broken apart by
hand. Scientists had to file down the hard shell of the lotus seed with
a little bit of a file, raise it with blisters, lotus seeds magically issued
buds, it seems that all lotus seeds can germinate and grow, so they
were tested in the botanical garden. After two years of meticulous
cultivation, the lotus seeds really produce turquoise lotus leaves and
bright pink lotus flowers. How to identify this is the millennium lotus
seeds? It is mainly the result of rock determination with radiocarbon
14 in mudstone layer where ancient lotus seed was found. Scientistshave identified that the lotus seed fell into the ground about 1,000
years ago, and he and the soil layer together to metamorphosis and
deposition formed. This was only confirmed 20 years later. In fact, this
is not the oldest lotus seed, in 1971, archaeologists in Henan
Zhengzhou Dahe Village Liushao cultural site found two ancient lotus
seeds, determined to have a history of 5000 years, he is the world's
longest life of the ancient lotus seed. There is a Chinese saying: "A
thousand years of grass seeds, ten thousand years of fish seeds." Life
is eternal, and the eternity of nature is the perfect hymn to life.
What is love? He is the nature of life. "Food and sex also." Sex
leads to love, and love is the barometer of vitality. The eternity of love
is the symbol of the eternity of life. In February 1966, Baxter, an
intelligence expert, used a lie detector to find that Arsinae had the
same curve pattern as humans on the display screen. After careful
study, he determined that plants, like humans, have feelings, plants
and animals have emotional changes, and the active spiritual life of
plants is synchronized with the biosphere of nature as a whole. Plants
also have sexual reproduction, but they have their own way of
expression, so the love of nature is connected, the eternity of love
comes from the eternity of life, there is never a love without life in
the world. Ancient and modern Chinese and foreign writers praise
only the vitality of love, in fact, is the praise of life and vitality, the
beauty of women are all revealed in the most vigorous vitality of
adolescence, love only exists in adolescence to burn like a fire such as
tea, produce a fascination impulse, which is also a kind of sexual
restriction magic power. Darwin put sex, sexuality and reproduction at
the top of his evolutionary list. It proves that there is a strong
fecundity in the biological world. The central theme of Malthus's
theory of population is the characterization of sexual desire, and one
of its two principles is that sexual desire between the sexes is
necessary and continues almost as it is. That is to say, in all the
processes of heredity, variation, and selection (regardless of any kind
of individual in any long struggle for survival), it is the desire to ask
both sexes, almost as the status quo continues, which reveals the core
of the genetic restriction system of immutability: This trait of sexual
desire between the sexes is inherited according to the species
restriction mechanism without variation, and there is no variation of
the species trait, the free combination and separation law of threegenerations to one is not suitable for the variation of this species trait,
and inheritance can only put this most basic character of the species.
Completely and without any choice, it is transmitted to all the
individual life genes derived from the species according to the specific
restriction mechanism. This is where Malthusian population theory
excites. In the past, people have overinterpreted Malthus's theory of
population. Malthus's argument for population growth. (not just
human population growth, but the growth of all animals) is
geometrically 2, 4, 6, 8... While food (mainly plant substances) grows
in an arithmetical order of 1,
Two, three, four, five... There is also a growth cycle, that is, the
geometric growth cycle of animals, in the case of humans is 20 years
(to reach the mean period of fertility), and the arithmetic growth
cycle of plants is 3 months, half a year, at most one year (to reach the
average maturity period of flowering and fruit). This wide difference
in growth cycles has balanced out the difference in growth levels. If
the cyclical growth rate is taken into account, the arithmetical
increase in plant food will greatly exceed the geometric increase in
animal (population) level, which is a natural ecological balance. It
embodies the harmony and integrity of the fairness of nature's
natural selection (food and population), so another principle of
Malthus: "food is necessary for human survival" also reveals the basic
law of human survival.
As an old Chinese saying goes, "Food is the people's priority."
This is a law that needs no proof. Thus Malthus revealed a species
that could not be changed, and he and both sexes were also
immutable, not suitable for inheritance of the law of variation.
Heredity can only transmit these two most basic traits of speciation
completely and without any choice according to the speciation
restriction mechanism to all individual life genes derived from
speciation. The hadith, which has been passed down in China for
thousands of years, is "food, color and nature", which is the earliest
expression of the mechanism of species restriction. In this way, the
internal mechanism of sex restriction is formulated as the law that
food and sex cannot vary.
This mechanism is unified to Malthusian population theory and
Darwin's origin of species, and Mendel's law of free combination andseparation. In fact, these three theories, three books are one book.
Malthus overemphasized the fierce competition for resources in the
living environment and the view of the struggle for survival that may
lead to disasters. The mechanism of biological evolution that inspired
Darwin's natural selection and the counterpart of natural selection
was the discovery of mathematical changes in biological genetic
processes during artificial selection (pea hybridization). In fact,
Malthusian principle is the principle of sex restriction in which both
sexes cannot vary. The core of Darwin's theory, in addition to
Malthusian principle and the recognition of the strong reproductive
power of organisms, proposes that there is variation in the biological
world, and different variants (species) have different adaptability to
the struggle for survival, and develops Malthusian's view of the
struggle for survival. The natural selection mechanism is introduced,
and all varieties are selected by nature. But Darwin ignored the
mechanisms of speciation and the mathematical laws of variation
(varieties produced by hybridization) that neither nature nor man
could allow for selection. Mendel benefited from the artificial
selection, took over Darwin's artificial selection thought, and used the
artificial selection of pea hybridization to solve the mathematical law
of the biological character variation process in the process of natural
selection and artificial selection, obeying the three-ratio rule, thus
introducing the mathematical development of genetic theory (genetic
code). However, Mendel did not explain the immutability of species,
neither natural nor artificial can change the most basic components
of species, varieties are only the variation of individual secondary
sexual traits within the scope of species allowed by species, and
natural selection is the mechanism to prevent the essential variation
of such species, so they should be a book. In fact, it is also a book, due
to the decision of individual human life (human life cannot
simultaneously have the gentleman experience of Malthus, and the
practice of Darwin's oceangoing expedition on the Beagle, and the
introverted thinking of Father Mendel's life). The book can only be
divided in this way, in different places, in different people, but at the
same time, and from the time of the publication of the theory of
these three life scientists, it is a book of the same period. Darwin's On
the Origin of Species is publishedMendel's theory was read on November 24, 1859, on February 8,
1865, at the same time as Malthus's earlier Theory of Population. This
simultaneity of time is not a coincidence, this is the inevitable
development of human understanding of life process, from this point
of view, these three theories are indeed a book, only to read them as
a book, in order to get a deeper understanding, this is also a change
of thinking method of reading.
If we read the theories of Malthus, Darwin, and Mendel as a
book, why was Mendel not recognized and accepted by the scientific
community during his lifetime or even longer? The scientific interface
for such a major historical discovery, but no one understands the
future historical role of this internal law of biological evolution and
development. History is not fair to Mendel! Compared to Mendel,
Darwin was lucky: his book on the Origin of Species sold out the day it
was released. Murduan, the London publisher, had to start printing
again at once. "On the Origin of Species" not only gave Darwin and his
theory of evolution brought historical praise, has had a profound
impact on human thought and understanding. After Darwin's death,
his grave can be adjacent to Newton's grave, which is people's
reverence for Darwin and Darwin's scientific contribution to the high
evaluation. Mendel died two years after Darwin, in 1884, and until
Mendel closed his eyes, he did not realize the joy of his success, even
if it was worth Mendel's relief that his paper was published in the
Journal of the Bloom Society of Natural Sciences. Within 10 years,
there were more than 120 scientific societies and research institutes
in the worldStrongest voice: "Look! My time has come." This is a
prophecy of great scientific truth. Isn't it? Sixteen years later Mendel's
time had really come.
Mendel's pea crossbreeding experiments originated between
1843 and 1851, and his experiments officially began in 1853, when
Darwin's Origin of Species had not yet been published in a book, and
artificial selection as an open theory had not yet been formed and
would not spread as traditional knowledge for more than a decade. It
can be seen that Mendel expressed his views in his own language,
and confirmed his views with his own actions, and found the law of
Mendelian inheritance with his own experiments (artificial selection).
In other words, his experiments and theories are independent of
Darwin's Origin of Species and ahead of the superiority theory ofnatural selection and artificial selection.
On the other hand, Mendel created an innovative mechanism of
biological research in terms of experimental research methods. He
used the statistical speculation of mathematical number theory to
understand the restriction effect of mathematical laws of biological
trait variation and the regularity of genetic phenomena. It's actually a
reflection of the pure mathematical regularity of the Mbius belt that
exists in biology,
It is an inevitable reflection of the identity of mathematical laws
of nature in mathematics and biology. In other words, the
mathematical laws of nature are everywhere, and Mendel's genetic
theory is exactly the feedback of this natural law in the biosphere,
what a rare and accurate innovation fulcrum!
In fact, Mendel's law is a very simple number theory of life, but
also the most basic, through the artificial selection of hybridization,
the number and character changes reflected in the results, the
statistical generation of offspring hybrid data, biological genetic
variation of the mathematical law. Finding patterns in small
quantitative changes was Mendel's key to success. Mendel found in
the hybridization of plants with different traits that the
first-generation hybrid could only exhibit the traits of one parent,
while the other parent could not be displayed. When these hybrids
were hybridized for the second generation, the traits of the two
parents were separated and could be displayed on different
individuals. The ratio of the number of individuals with the dominant
trait (red pea) is always three to one, that is, the separation is
produced by the second generation of hybridization, and this is the
ratio of the number of second generation hybrid individuals produced
by the hybrid separation variation. If you cross plants with two or
more pairs of different traits at the same time, the second-generation
hybrids produced by each trait are independently separated by a ratio
of three to one, and do not interfere with each other, so that the
individual variation ratio and the trait variation ratio are the same
ratio, which is where the three-ratio uniformity lies.
In fact, Laozi has a more profound discussion on the three than
one in the Tao Te Ching, which is the crystallization of the wisdom ofthe Chinese nation two thousand years ago. He pointed out: "Tao
gives birth to one, life gives birth to two, two gives birth to three,
three gives birth to all things." Everything (3) is 1 (individual), and
everything is derived from the mathematical ratio of the smallest odd
prime number 3, which is the only one in nature, to the smallest odd
number 1, and Lao Zi reveals the number theoretic mechanism that
life, heaven and earth, and nature generally follow.
This is Mendel's enduring contribution. Mendel was convinced
that his time would come, and it wasn't long before, in 1900, three
biologists, almost simultaneously, discovered the same laws of
heredity in their own scientific practices. There is de Vries of the
Netherlands, who has been crossbreeding with white wheatbottle
grass since 1892, and has obtained the same three-uniform results as
Mendel in the second generation of crossbreeding. Then Germany's
Collings in the 1900 pea, corn second generation hybridization, found
this law, he in Fock's paper index, found the sleeping 35 years of
Mendel's genetic law was deeply surprised, and Mendel's experiment
gave a high evaluation; At the same time, Mendel's compatriot, the
Austrian biologist Chushmak, also discovered the three-ratio
uniformity in a pea cross in 1899. Compared with Mendel, these three
biologists found the laws of heredity in their own independent
experiments, but they also found that their research results were a
copy of the laws of heredity of an abbot 35 years earlier, and they
could only rediscover Mendel's laws of heredity. In the annals of
biological science. The Mendel era magically arrived in Holland,
Austria, and Germany at the same time, and with the help of the
British biologist Bateson, it began in the whole of Western Europe,
including the United States, and pushed the world into the genetic
age.
The results of scientific research that form a certain category of
science are often the joint efforts of several or more people, or even
several generations. From different sides, on the basis of one or
several fulcrum to explore each other's citation and extension to get
the final completion. They are both independent points, but also
linked to a system of engineering.
64 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)The fulcrum is often the medium through which they connect.
The fifth chapter "The Fulcrum of Innovation" theoretical science
history review:
10. Find Mendel's key letters (in order of the original book
number)
The discussion of the fulcrum has brought us many new
discoveries, making us feel the great power of the fulcrum in scientific
innovation, like the key to open a scientific door, which really makes
us happy and excited. We start with an inch-wide paper tape and a
small pair of scissors, on the Macbius surface in Leipzig, Germany, in
1858, to the home of Mendelian laws of inheritance, a botanical
laboratory at St. Thomas Monastery in Blom, Austria. We wandered
around the Germanic homeland of Europa and the French city of Paris,
visited the former home of Isaac Newton, visited Darwin's secluded
estate in Davenby village, and went to the Pasteur Institute, famous
for overcoming rabies... The pearl in the mathematical crown from
Archimedes' large number cattle problem to Goldbach's conjecture;
From McBibius with only one face to Mendel's laws of heredity... The
development of bioscience in Europe at the end of the 8th century
was characterized by: "In this short span of half a century,
mathematicians, biologists, geologists, medics, and botanists from the
Netherlands, France, Austria, Germany, and Italy have almost
simultaneously and with one focus, pursued the mathematical biology
of life evolution, and almost simultaneously uncovered the secrets of
biogenetics that resonate with human beings." When we compile the
theories of these scientists and read them as a book, it seems that
there really is a magical illusion that leads us deep into the secret
path of life, and little by little, we approach the mystery of the
incomprehensible. Where is the code for breaking the life sciences
once and for all? Where is the key to unlocking all the mysteries of
nature's life? Mbius has led us down the path of three to one, and
where will three to one take us?
One fulcrum at a time, connecting nature bit by bit to form a
table which we compare with the Menelian matrix of genetic factors
drawn in Chapter 9 of this book. It reflects the same mathematical
law as the relative change of the interlacing of square matrices. J, K, L,M, N, O, P, and Q are the eight forms of digital symbol encryption.
Shape into 4 modules (plates). The transformation of the positions of
these four modules in the genetic code population (table) produces
16 groups of modules. Each small module square in the 16 groups of
modules has the property of equal vertical and horizontal (up, down,
left and right) diagonal spacing. Each module is composed of 4 groups
of cipher squares. Because the code is determined by three bases and
one phosphate. This forms the mathematical basis of the genetic
matrix 3:1. According to the genetic square (Figure 8) 3:1 rule,
modules produce recessive and dominant attributes. Their global
interspacing (up and down and left and right) opposite angles are
separated, resulting in the recessive and dominant global interphase
(intergenerational) heritability of the global module. In other words,
life inheritance exists in the unit of genetic code, but also exists in the
unit of large and small squares of genetic code modules of individual
inheritance and the dual inheritance of the whole module. Both
implicit and explicit cryptography exist in their own "matrix" system of
linkage effects. So the genetic code is governed by the genetic matrix.
Heredity has its own internal "matrix" method, which constitutes the
specific restriction mechanism.
Therefore, the computer is the artificial reproduction of the
mathematical infinite combination of the species restriction
mechanism, and the mathematical application and reproduction of
biological intelligence. There are other ways to look at it - if you look
at the trajectory of this pivot,
Perhaps more can appreciate the long and ruthless development
process of each discipline.
In the summer of 1955, in the botanical garden at the foot of
Xiangshan, there is a small piece of pale red lotus, attracting many
extraordinary tourists, there are many botanists, are marveling at
each lotus, this lotus from the surface looks nothing special, pale pink
petals, standing on the lotus. · The large lotus leaves like a Pu fan
attached to the water, holding the pink lotus particularly eye-catching,
experienced life circle. Forming a chain of interlocking biological
evolution, forming an endless band that can never be broken...
Mendel, de Vries, Collings, Chogammack, Bateson found the number
ratio of the mathematical code of life science, but this three-to-onebiological genetic law has its own biological time clock of character
variation, and has its own inherent cycle of natural selection. It
cannot observe the process of character variation under a microscope,
as Pasteur did in discovering microorganisms, nor can it carry out
biochemical tests on experimental plants before the end of the
character variation of biological hybridization. In the long inherent
cycle of natural selection for biological variation, which time window
of the cycle does the combination of biological traits take place? At
what stage of the cycle does the separation of biological traits occur,
why biological traits are combined, why biological traits are separated,
the relationship between the deep change process of this separation
and combination and biological genetic factors, what is the genetic
gene, where it comes from and where it goes, and what mechanisms
restrict its change? There is a series of secrets deeply hidden in this, if
it is like a digital code, what is the key letter that can decipher this
code? And how do you combine the key letters? How should it be
arranged and according to what number theory? All this has left many
biologists with no answer. But Mendel's other key to the history of
science, the genius prediction that "genetic factors are part of
chromosomes," remained in question long after Mendel's laws of
inheritance were recognized. Even the most faithful disseminator of
Mendel's theory, the British biologist Bateson, declared in his lecture:
"Mendel's genetic theory will play an important role in the discussion
of all evolutionary problems in the future," thus putting Mendel on
the throne of the founder of biogenetics. However, Bateson has
always been skeptical of Mendel's legacy of this "key." Always against
Mendel's great prediction that the genetic factor was part of the
chromosome, Mendel gave the key to mankind, under Bateson's
influence for 46 years. Although 46 years is only a short moment
compared with the long century of human evolution, it is half a life in
terms of the time span of a human life. Due to the characteristics of
human life time, and the relatively long growth cycle of plants,
Mendel only completed the mathematical law of biological
inheritance, and the key generated by his inspiration was left to
future generations without reservation, he hoped that human beings
could use their own key to decipher the code of the entire life
evolution science, so that the brilliance of Mendel's era would come
early. However, without finding the link between chromosomes andgenetic factors, it will not be possible to bring a warm spring to
biological science by relying only on three ratios. Once again, history
has entrusted the task of finding the fulcrum of innovation to
subsequent climbers. The early spring sun shines on the winding Daba
Mountains, and the fantastic clouds curl up to cover the high top bees
of the Qinling Mountains. Only the verdiness of the mountainside
shows the rich and brilliant green of Shennongjia primitive forest far
in front of our eyes. Let us go to the ancient towering fir slope to feel
the style of Shennongjia, a "green treasure house" in central China
that has not yet been cleared. Take in the natural green of nature,
Experience the true natural selection of the virgin forest. How
many magical lives are there in Shennongjia? People go in and out of
fairyland's wonderful cold and warm caves; Or walk on the strange
and rare slope of the tidal bank and watch the river rise and fall three
times a day; Go to Wujia Mountain to wait for a clear sky, watch a
strong white light in the fields, or go to the deep pool between Stone
House Village and Maoer Guan Village, look for a rare monster... We
came to the white animal country, where the dense Huashan pine,
the thick oak forest and the climbing wisteria at the foot, in the light
green of early spring only exposed the rugged rocky path, which
looked like a brocade belt tied in the clouds. Only see in front of the
mountain growing layer of pine trees, like a deep green barrier, in
front of this pine forest, near the pine branches and needles exudes
the fragrance of turpentine. Let us feel in this balsam that there is an
infinite vitality. Have you ever thought of the white squirrels, the
white crows, the white spiders... Blue sky, green trees, green space
how natural selection of white squirrels, white spiders! There is no
Mendelian artificial choice here. Everything is carried out in the
self-discipline of nature, but these small animals, why in Shennongjia,
have become so holy, changed a white feather, even crows are also
pleasing, not to mention white golden monkeys.
"How can black crows become white crows, there is no artificial
selection of hybridization, only natural selection, then how can the
variation of white in this, and how can it be explained by three to one
mathematics?" What if we brought in a black raven?"
"Bring it in, and it will die out."
'Why?"Specific restriction mechanism."
"Without species restriction, the white crows will eat the black
crows alive."
It's an existential struggle for territorial possession, natural
selection. This is Malthusian theory."
What is the origin of these animals? Is it mountains, is it water, is
it forest, earth aura, cloud curling... The mystery of what makes this
white animal. Reproduction, selection, variation, inheritance, all ideas
converge according to the same white, different species and
individuals of the same species, all according to the same character,
with the existing theory is really incomprehensible! Only nature has
this magical power of selection, which is the superiority of Darwin's
natural selection. White animals are also found in other parts of the
world, like polar bears. But polar bears live in groups of the same
species, not in the same area where many of the same traits (white
populations) live. There are also white tigers in India and white lions
in Africa, which are typical of white animals. These are patterns of
homogeneous individuals living in groups and local biospheres that
can be explained by natural selection and genetic variation.
Shennongjia not only white squirrels, white spiders, white crows, but
also white snakes, white rabbits, white bears, white wolves, white
deer, white musk deer, white snub-nosed monkeys... So many
populations of white animals, living in the same area of the same
living environment, sharing the same traits, passed down from
generation to generation, how to explain the use of species restriction
mechanism? This can elevate a certain trait of organisms (white) to
the height of speciation (food, color), strengthen inheritance, and can
explain the similar transmission of a certain trait from generation to
generation in different population regions.
""Also, so that no matter a certain trait of an organism, it can be
free of variability and enter the speciation contract mechanism?"
"I think it should be so. This is the revelation of Shennongjia's
white animal secret."
Suppose we introduce a black crow, or a brown squirrel, or a
black spider, or some other non-white individual animal. For example,
black crows, how the white crows will react, we can discuss as follows.
If the black crow is strong, can adapt to this living environment inShennongjia, survive, and can breed with the white crow. According
to the Mendelian law of inheritance, the first generation of hybrids,
black crows can only be submerged: only the second generation of
hybrids, black crows according to the trinity ratio of genetic square
map species, the second generation of hybrids will have three white
crows and one black crow. According to this law of hybridization,
natural selection of several generations, white crows and black crows
from the third generation, according to 3×4 ": 1×4(3:1 multiplied by
4") series development, such as the second generation 3:1, 12:4,
48:16, 192:48, 786:192... If this law is drawn as a square diagram, it
can be clearly seen that the general law of intergenerational
inheritance. Both horizontal and vertical display intergenerational
inheritance, with the hybrids of black crows arranged, and a row of
white crows separated by vertical rows (FIG. 8). As can be seen from
the figure, hybrids are necessary in the process of natural selection,
and often hybrids are active genes for specially-superior traits.
Therefore, the hybrid itself is the embodiment of the mechanism of
superior and inferior elimination in the process of reproduction and
mating. All hybrids that can exist are winners in the process of
elimination in the struggle for existence. A variation produced by a
hybrid is only a sign of its existence, a sign of the use or decline of a
trait. Therefore, whether artificial selection or natural selection,
naturally occurring hybrids (rather than some exogenous mutation)
are the result of selection under the specific restriction mechanism,
and are the winners after a long period of subjugation. Hybrids are
often a reflection of good speciation, the chain of biological evolution,
and hybrids often form the most powerful link in the evolutionary
chain.
From the above formula, we can see that 88, a small square in
the square, produces black crows (hybrids) according to the 3:1
mathematical rule. This little square is represented by our mouth.
Mouth X4 is four small squares, and its ratio of white to black crows is
12:4. The ratio of the mouth X4 white to black crow is 48:16. And so
on to 192:48, 786:192... They are 4 square, 16 square and so on...
From this geometric genetic proliferation change, it can also be seen
that in the process of changing the number of each level to a higher
level, the white crow (series) constitutes the base of the next genetic
square black crow (hybrid). Example 48:16,48 is the base of the nextgeneration (square) 192:48, and likewise 192(white) forms the base of
786:192 (black). By analogy, this law reflects the extremely basic
genetic reproduction in the evolution of hybrid species.
This is a fulcrum. It could explain the sudden proliferation of the
East Asian migratory locust in an area in a very short period of time
To breed thousands of disastrous mutations per square meter is
the progression of this array of heredity. This is Malthusian population
theory emphasizes the empirical growth of population in geometric
progression. Therefore, if we bring in a black crow, once it can survive
natural selection, it can become the leader of the white crow
population, even if the black crow feathers (white traits) can not be
inherited and appear in the next generation of hybrids, but other
traits that are conducive to specific evolution will also recessive exist
in the offspring of the hybrid, becoming the advantage of specific
evolution. The recessive role of the species evolution superiority will
suddenly appear in a future generation of hybrids, and this variation is
long and latent, and is the result of the species restriction.
This suggests that blackbird crows can be a positive factor in the
evolution of white crow species, a trait shared by all hybrids. The
evolution of life is completed by natural selection in the struggle for
survival, including the sexual variation and heredity of the artificial
selection process to achieve, the advantages and disadvantages of
evolution are concentrated in the appearance of the offspring hybrids
produced by reproduction, to see how many kinds of advantages they
inherit and how many kinds of shortcomings. The restriction law of
speciation guarantees the essential speciation superiority and the
immutability of the derivative process of hybrid. It can also evolve a
certain trait, rise to the height of speciality, strengthen the genetic
generation of immutability, so as to ensure that the genetic process
does not occur any species dislocation, will not make the cross
between white crows and black crows, produce species varieties
other than crows, while ensuring the purity of speciality, develop
certain character advantages of speciality. Reproduction produces
individuals that correspond to naturally selected species in the
struggle for survival. It can be seen that the evolution of life is a
continuous, mutually restricted, whole organic whole process. Can
this theory be tested in the field? The answer is hard. For what? Forbringing a black crow into the Shennongjia Nature Reserve. We have
to set up camp here and watch for years, and the white crows live in
their nests high in the branches of the trees, and the black crows we
put in, where do they live in this primeval forest, and can they
reproduce? We can't monitor. Plus the seasons... That is to say, we
can't find it at all, can't follow it, just let it go. That's why Mendel used
peas for his experiments. Plants have their advantages. However,
there are also disadvantages, the growth cycle of the plant is too long,
and it will die immediately after leaving the soil. So who is the most
suitable experimental variety? It's a fruit fly. Mosquitoes and flies
have a short growth cycle. This was described in Aristotle's Zoology
more than 2,000 years ago, and the fruit fly is quite fertile. This
overcame Mendel's difficulty in using peas to grow longer. Moreover,
fruit flies do not need fixed soil to grow, only milk bottles can be used,
and can be observed with a microscope.
Why not cross flies to find Mendel's key letters. Aren't we
looking for the fulcrum of scientific innovation? Sour beer became the
fulcrum of Pasteur's discovery of microorganisms, and fruit flies,
which are hated by everyone, constituted the fulcrum of American
biologist Morgan's Nobel Prize. This is a correct choice to overcome
the Mendelian pea hybridization long growth cycle and can not be
separated from the observation. Fruit flies are easy to reproduce and
grow rapidly, which will greatly shorten the cycle of hybridization and
character variation, which is convenient to observe and save time and
effort. Since the day in 1910 when Morgan discovered the production
of a single white-eyed drosophila in an experimental fruit fly hybrid,
Morgan has completely changed his position from the anti-Mendelian
genetics, and he continues to use a single generation of
cross-breeding with the white-eyed drosophila
It is the red-eyed fruit fly, and when the first generation of hybrid
fruit flies are mated with each other, the white-eyed fruit fly appears
in the second generation of fruit flies, which is completely in common
with Mendel's pea hybrid experiment. So Morgan led his students to
form experimental research groups to investigate Mendel's hints of
the combination of the deep cell's chromosomes and Mendel's
genetic factors, and soon achieved important results.
That is to say, chromosomes are carriers of genetic factors, andchromosomes and genetic factors are real physical entities. Morgan
concentrated the advantages of the group, repeated trial and
observation, found that a single chromosome can carry many factors,
Morgan measured that there are four chromosomes in the fruit fly,
forming four linked bands, a variety of traits of life are matched with
many different factors. Due to the limited number of biological cell
chromosomes, it can be loaded with many factors. Therefore, many
different traits of life can be inherited, which deciphered the key
letters of Mendel's genetic factors and chromosome association in
fruit flies, and created Morgan's "Mendelian genetic Mechanism".
We may wish to deduce the theories of biology, physics, and
chemists on behalf of children, and use a theoretical fulcrum to walk
directly into the deep field of biological heredity, to find the key
letters of life heredity, and to find the mysterious DNA.
Chapter 6 "Give You the Fulcrum of innovation" Innovation
theory 2003 edition science
Historical review:
11. Franklin stops at the three steps (according to the number of
the original chapter)
Morgan was born into the famous Morgan family in the rich
southern state of Kentucky. Morgan, whose full name was Thomas
Hunter Morgan, was born in 1866 in Lexington, Kentucky. In President
Lincoln's command of the North-South American War, his uncle was
the most determined anti-Lincoln Southern Army general,
commanding thousands of troops, known as the "Southern Army
Thor." Despite his outstanding achievements, he eventually lost
because he turned against the wheel of history. After unification, the
Morgan family remained prosperous. Morgan spent his childhood as
the rich son of a farm owner, collecting plants, flowers and animals.
After high school, he studied at Kentucky State College, and after
college, he was admitted to Hopkins University, where he was an
outstanding graduate student in biology. Under the guidance of the
famous biogeneticist Professor Brusk, involved in the research topic of
biogenetics, during this period, there is no obvious scientific
achievements. In 1904, he joined Columbia University as professor of
biology. In 1908, he began to step out of the circle of Mendelian planthybridizations, and under the inspiration of Aristotle's description of
the Drosophila, he began to conduct embryological experiments with
fruit flies, and until 1910 Morgan remained a staunchly opposed to
Menelian inheritance laws. During this period, he benefited from his
brother biologist Bateson's comprehensive and in-depth study of
Mendelian genetic theory, and laid a solid theoretical foundation and
ideological preparation to accept Mendelian genetic mechanism for
the opportunity to capture the accidental fulcrum of small white-eye
Drosophilla mutation. One day in March 1910, Morgan discovered a
mutation in the little walleye fruit fly, which gave Morgan a major
breakthrough in genetic theory.
In 1915, with Statvant and Bridges, he jointly signed and
published the epoch-making theoretical magnum of the Morgan
School, Mendelian Genetic Mechanism, and subsequently published
the Material Basis of Heredity and the Theory of Genetics, discovering
and summarizing the law of linkage and exchange, the third law of
genetics. In 1933, Morgan was awarded the Nobel Prize in recognition
of his significant contributions to genetics. In 1945, he ended his
illustrious life. There are many external conditions and internal factors
for Morgan's success. One, with a master and Roux. Second, thanks to
his brother Bateson's praise for Mendel's theory of heredity. Third, it
captures in time the most important fulcrum of scientific innovation -
the mutation of a tiny white-eyed fruit fly. This rare chance, so that he
knocked on a new door of science. Fourth, Morgan benefited from
the collective efforts of the entire research group. Morgan only
completed the part of Mendel's prediction of the genius of
chromosomes and heredity, but ignored the extension of the
three-to-one fulcrum, which was the inevitable feedback of the
limitations still deep in Morgan's pre-1910 opposition to Mendel's
theory.
Therefore, it can be seen that the fulcrum plays a decisive and
important role in the process of scientific innovation. The fulcrum side
can bring explosive major breakthroughs. At the same time, there is
also an extension of the fulcrum after the fulcrum, that is, the
secondary burst, that is, the extension of the fulcrum. Deep
excavation will inevitably lead to secondary outbursts at a fulcrum in
depthBroken.
The second breakthrough of fulcrum is showing the mutual
relationship and correlation between disciplines and disciplines. We
have discussed above that there is a certain contingency in the
discovery of fulcrum, so the role of fulcrum can be summarized from
the following points: ① Fulcrum is hidden. ② Fulcrum often has an
unprecedented breakthrough effect. The fulcrum phenomenon is
often the instant phenomenon of the essence of things. Therefore,
the fulcrum phenomenon reflects the essential law of things. (4) The
fulcrum phenomenon is instantaneous, essential, random, and
ever-changing in nature. ⑤ From finding the fulcrum to
understanding the fulcrum, the process of reflecting the essential law
is both sudden and successively extended, and exists in the deep level
of the second breakthrough. Taking the Danish physicist Oster, whom
Pasteur once talked about, as an example, it can be seen that the
fulcrum has the above basic characteristics. In 1820, Oster
accidentally discovered that a wire through which an electric current
was applied could make a magnetic needle rotate, and Morse
invented the telegraph at this fulcrum, but the telegraph did not
reveal the essential law reflected in this fulcrum phenomenon. If
Auster follows this fulcrum law, it can discover a deeper fulcrum law,
and achieve a second breakthrough beyond the telegraph. This is
what Newton meant when he spoke of standing on the shoulders of
giants, forming a fulcrum that could move the entire earth. Therefore,
the historical mission of the second breakthrough of Auster's fulcrum
fell on the shoulders of Faraday, the son of an English blacksmith.
Faraday stood on Auster's shoulder, took over the fulcrum of a live
wire that turned the needle, and repeated Auster's experiment. On
August 30, 1821, he discovered that the small magnetic needle was
moving in a circle around the current carrying wire. Faraday
immediately seized on this fulcrum phenomenon, 10 years of
uninterrupted experimentation, thinking, to 1831 he changed Oster's
method of using straight wires, two wires around a ring magnet, one
wire connected to the power supply, the other wire next to a small
magnetic needle (Oster's small magnetic needle is an accidental
coincidence, Faraday's small magnetic needle is the product of the
fulcrum's thinking transformation), so when the wire switch is closed,
the small magnetic needle next to the wire produces the Oster effect.On the contrary, when the wire switch is turned on, the small
magnetic needle beside the wire is also deflected, so the Auster
mechanism of electromagnetic induction has achieved a second
breakthrough in Faraday's hand, resulting in Faraday's kinetic
electromagnetism and kinetic magnetoelectricity. Oster's fulcrum
continued to extend in Faraday's hands and discovered the
mechanism by which conductors cut magnetic field lines to generate
induced current. The further extension of the Oster fulcrum along the
induced current raises Faraday's electromagnetic theory to the new
height of Faraday's field and field. Therefore, Faraday's field theory
has formed a strong fulcrum, and it is also expected that later comers
will realize the breakthrough of Faraday's "field" fulcrum again.
The fulcrum does have a hidden, invisible tunnel. If you connect
the Oster fulcrum to the Faraday fulcrum, the path naturally leads to
Maxwell's next breakthrough. In the silence of Faraday's magnetic
field lines and fields acknowledged by no one in the European
scientific community, Maxwell saw the true meaning of virtual field,
which was considered that Faraday's magnetic field lines and fields
were ambiguous at that time, and used simple mathematical
equations to accurately explain that magnetic field lines did exist in
the space around the current, and extended and spread the Faraday
magnetic field lines. The realization of Maxwell's moving electric field
generates magnetic field, and the moving magnetic field generates
the high-level breakthrough of electric field, thus triggering a great
change in physics. Maxwell's theory of alternating electromagnetic
fields.
Maxwell's argument in his "Physical Lines of Force" changed
people's monomial understanding starting from Oster, and
established
the
unidirectional
electromagnetic
alternating
understanding that the conduction current in the conductor can
arouse the magnetic field movement into the bidirectional. "An
alternating electric field generates an alternating magnetic field,
which in turn generates an alternating electric field," he said.
Therefore, whenever there is an alternating electric field somewhere
in space, this alternating electric field will generate a new alternating
magnetic field in the space around it. And repeated electric field
generated magnetic field, magnetic field generated electric field,changeMaxwell established his own quantitative theory of
electromagnetism, taking Faraday's kinetic electricity to generate
magnetism, moving magnetism to generate electricity, and rising to a
variable electric field to generate a magnetic field, and a variable
magnetic field to generate an electric field. This alternating
electromagnetic field produces electromagnetic waves, and then
Maxwell found from the calculation that the ratio of electrostatic
units and electromagnetic units in electricity is always 310740/
second, which is extremely close to the figure of the speed of light
314558 km/second determined by Fiseau, and this figure has become
a new fulcrum, while producing a new breakthrough inflection point.
Because Maxwell felt deeply that this number should be the speed of
electromagnetic waves. So in 1864, he boldly predicted scientifically:
"Light is also an electromagnetic wave", so that the theory rose to the
unity of light, electricity and magnetism, and got the unified
certification of mathematics.
Will Maxwell's new fulcrum lead to new and even greater
breakthroughs? Yes, we can see this from the opening words of a
paper: "It is well known that Maxwell electrodynamics, when applied
to moving bodies as is now generally understood, causes some
asymmetry which does not seem to be inherent in the phenomenon."
Consider, for example, the electrodynamic interaction between a
magnet and a conductor. Here the observed phenomena relate only
to the relative motion of the conductor and the magnet, but whether
one or the other of the two bodies is in motion is, in the usual view,
two entirely different things..." This is Einstein published in 1905 in
the German Journal of Physics, the epoch-making first work of
relativity, "On the Electrodynamics of moving bodies," the opening
words, Einstein's theory of relativity is to choose the Maxwell fulcrum
extension of the inflection point, as their own fulcrum. Einstein broke
through the Maxwell fulcrum, and since then he has been
unstoppable, creating the classical theory from special relativity to
general relativity. Therefore, the fulcrum also has the property of
transformation. From the Maxwell fulcrum to the Einstein fulcrum,
there is a class transformation. This is the sixth characteristic of the
fulcrum that we want to summarize. It reflects that there is a certain
internal relationship between the branches of science. Therefore,
grasping the inflection point of the fulcrum is the key to findinginnovative breakthroughs between scientific categories, which is the
transformation of the fulcrum. The theory of relativity is the most
successful and brilliant model of fulcrum transformation.
It seems that the grasp of fulcrum transformation is a very
important knowledge. It requires those who are prepared and must
have a deeper and wider range of knowledge, otherwise the turning
point of the fulcrum is difficult to find. The fulcrum described above is
only the successful performance of the fulcrum application in physics,
and the extension and transformation of the fulcrum in biology. It also
plays an immortal role in scientific innovation. Because the
phenomena studied by science are the nature of nature
Phenomena, natural phenomena are all the same. The Mbius
molecular fulcrum and biological evolution discussed in the previous
sections are a good illustration. Below we just want to discuss the
transformation of the fulcrum. Mendel established Mendel's theory
of heredity on the fulcrum of pea hybridization, and found the
three-ratio uniformity. At the same time, Mendel also predicted
profoundly that the chromosome was the carrier of the entity of
genetic factors, just as Maxwell predicted that light was also
electromagnetic wave. Morgan, who was originally an anti-Mendelian
genetic theory, also completely changed his opposition to Mendelian
genetic theory from the mutant innovation fulcrum of the small
white-eyed Drosophila, but Morgan did not develop and extend on
the three-to-one fulcrum, but found the inflection point of the
fulcrum on this fulcrum, and found the habitat entity of the genetic
factor community from the four chromosomes of the drosophila. He
created Morgan's "Gene Theory", successfully completed the
transformation of fulcrum, and discovered the third law of genetics.
He was the first person to win the Nobel Prize in biogenetics.
Therefore, the transformation of the fulcrum is often to turn to a
more brilliant fulcrum. However, the difficulty of turning the fulcrum
to the inflection point is very large, as we said before, it needs deeper
speculation and a wider range of knowledge, but also needs to have a
more professional multidisciplinary, high-quality condensation of
scientific culture, with these preparations, there will be more
opportunities to successfully transform the fulcrum.
There is also the chance that if Morgan had not been in the labthat day, he would not have found the little white-eyed fruit fly,
Morgan would have lost the opportunity to catch the white-eyed fruit
fly, and this pivot would not have been possible. Or the little
walley-eyed Drosophila did not appear in the experimental field of
Moore's group on this day in 1910, or there was the mutation of the
little walley-eyed Drosophila that Morgan ignored and missed, just as
when the Munich University botany professor Nagel received
Mendel's paper, for some reason did not attract his attention, and
missed an innovative fulchm. There is also an element of chance and
luck, which we should especially avoid, because the slightest
difference here may lead to the loss of innovation opportunities,
resulting in lifelong regret.
The history of science is full of examples of this. For example, the
aforementioned Hooke, he discovered the famous Hooke's law, but in
the fulcrum transformation, the mathematical foundation is slightly
less, "although before Newton found the inverse square law, but did
not get the complete demonstration of the law of gravitation, lost the
crown of the founder of classical mechanics." The most regrettable
thing in biogenetics is the British female scientist Franklin. She
received a first-class education at Paul's Girls' School from childhood,
and was a top student at Cambridge University. She was versatile and
beautiful, and she was a famous young female physicist in Europe at
that time. She used X-ray diffraction to study the structure of nucleic
acids from a crystallographic perspective. Franklin's profound
knowledge of crystallography, coupled with her dexterity of hands,
hard work, and intelligent judgment, had enabled her to see into the
full secrets of nucleic acids.
For the first time in the ranks of scientific giants, we mention the
name of a young female scientist. Franklin extrapolated the
multi-stranded
double
helix
structure
of
nucleic
acid
biomacromolecules from the crystal image, and also took a beautiful
picture of DNA. With a feminine sensitivity, she guessed that the
variable parts of the bases inside the nucleic acid structure were
related to the rules of the repeating parts of the bases. A
corresponding mechanism... The discovery of the double helix
Crick, one of 75 authors of the Fundamental Theory of the
Whole Life Sciences I (" The Law of the Whole Plate Heredity - TheWhole Life of the Big Bang "), also admitted that Franklin was very
close to this point, but unfortunately, Franklin stopped there.
What's the reason? Mainly because she did not grasp the
opportunity of the fulcrum and inflection point, she already had a
very beautiful diffraction diagram, and as long as she turned from
macromolecular crystallography to genetics, and drew her own guess
boldly, it was a complete DNA biological structure model, it would be
done. But why did Franklin stop at the third step? Is it women's
emotional weakness, or women's fickle feelings? No, none of it.
Madame Curie did not stop because of her husband's sudden death,
and finally won the Nobel Prize. Madame Curie's success shows that
the weakness of women's feelings is the precious quality of persistent
pursuit. Women's fickleness, the transformation of scientific thinking
is undoubtedly the advantage of talent. It may be that she was
confused about Mendelian inheritance theory, or that she did not
realize that the macromolecular crystal structure obtained by X-rays
could reveal the mystery of DNA. Perhaps Franklin's luck is not very
good, such a beautiful woman, 30 years old in science has a successful
achievement, but died young, 37 years old was killed by cancer life, it
is regrettable. In 1962, four years after Franklin's death, the project
won the Nobel Prize, and had she lived, she would have been on the
podium with Wilkins, Watson, and Crick. It is a pity that the female
scientist did not make it to this day, and the Nobel Prize was missed,
and neither honor nor wreath could appear on her epitaph.
Others say it's her personality. It is said that she and Wilkins did
not get along, which led to Wilkins' breakup with Franklin, and thus
lost the chance to discover the secret of the DNA double helix. When
the Wilkins team loses Franklin, they lose their chance to discover the
DNA double helix, and they lose their chance to win the title. If
Wilkins and Franklin had worked together, luck might not have
befallen Watson and Crick. Watson and Crick's DNA model began in a
circle in a triple helix, and it was only when Watson saw Franklin's
crystal diffraction pattern that the breakthrough came. Just two
weeks after seeing the diffraction pattern, Watson and Crick produced
a modified double helix model of DNA, which was published in the
British science journal Nature on April 25, 1953, with athousand-word essay and an article certified by Wilkins and Franklin,
and shocked the scientific community. Thus the credit of Franklin's
diffraction pattern is decisive, and is a strong basis for Watson and
Crick.
Maybe it was illness that stopped Franklin at the threshold of the
DNA double helix. Maybe it was all of these factors. In short, from
FIG. 9
Pivot to the inflection point to form the pivot point of change,
but also need the indispensable inspiration, courage and imagination,
and
Unbreakable confidence in career success. This is what you have
to have when you find the fulcrum. It is also necessary to deal with
the lack of recognition, understanding and difficult silence. Or, like
Mendel, never understood. Confidence is the guarantee of success for
scientists. Young students must establish confidence in scientific
innovation, so that this precious confidence, from the moment we
find the fulcrum of scientific innovation, coagulum experience, and
create scientific brilliance!The seventh chapter is the Fulcrum of Innovation in the Year of
2003, a review of scientific history of innovation theory
Twelve, intersecting in the mysterious DNA (according to the
original book chapter sequence number)
San Francisco Bay, the United States, is not only a beautiful
harbor where Chinese live, but also has the world's recognized
reputation of "gene valley", where Stanford University in San
Francisco is the center of bioengineering science research. Like Silicon
Valley at that time, it has become the forefront of bioengineering
research and the cradle of bioengineering research. Since the
rediscovery of Mendelian inheritance. Genetics moved from Western
Europe to North America along with European immigrants. Morgan
took over Mendel's theory and made a major breakthrough in gene
theory and genetic mechanism in the United States in just a few
decades. Latecomers lead the world in the field of bioengineering.
Why can the United States in a short 200 years of founding, in
science and all aspects of development, can catch up, ahead of the
world? This is a result of natural selection in recent history. History is
the simplest description of man's struggle for his own existence, the
description of natural selection. The United States is one of the most
successful immigrant countries in modern times.
As we all know, America is a nation of immigrants. Every state
and every city was reclaimed by immigrants from every continent of
the world, and ninety-nine percent of its population came here. This
has formed the great integration of the nations of the world, the great
integration of science, talent and material, and has created the mythof American science. With the continuous revelation of the mystery of
DNA, human beings have begun to break through from the natural
selection of eugenic inheritance of distant relatives to the idea and
practice of human individual genetic engineering. Cloning has been
pushed to the forefront of bioengineering. In fact, cloning is not a
miracle, it and the spectrum, is a natural existence. In the process of
life evolution, there exists the phenomenon of cloning. For us human
beings in the 21st century, it is only the discovery and new
understanding of this phenomenon of life. This is the same as using
the spectral rainbow principle of the Doppler effect, · building a
spectrograph, · and then using redshift to study changes in the
motion of stars in the universe. It doesn't change the laws of the
universe.
The cloning of Dolly is just a kind of holographic reproduction of
life that exists in secret on the road of biological evolution and
recreates the same kind of individual life. This reveals that somatic
cells have holographic genetic properties under certain conditions. At
the beginning of human birth, there is the asexual reproduction of
triplets and multiple births, which is a special function of cell life.
Because the cloning of Dolly itself did not clone individual life other
than sheep from somatic cells. Cloning and variation are still natural
reproduction under the strict restrictions stipulated by the specific
restriction mechanism. Cloning cannot create a new supernatural
being. Even if a strange variant of humanity is created, it will be
destroyed
But choose the merciless sea tide. For nature will not, as Wilmut
did with 434 to 1, maintain the existence of an anti-natural variety,
and not be eliminated by nature. Mendel had the genius to predict
that "heredity is determined by genetic factors." Chromosomes are
carriers of genetic factors. Building the classical framework of modern
genetics, Morgan took over Mendelian genetic mechanism and
discovered the linkage and exchange rules of heredity. Morgan
believed that the specific sex state of an individual species originates
from pairs of elements that are interlinked in the reproductive matter
to form a number of linked groups, and the members of the
corresponding linked groups sometimes have an orderly exchange.
Here Morgan describes Mendelian genetic factors in terms of originalsand members. This invisible factor pioneered formal genetics. The
word "gene" was first used in 1899 by Danish geneticist Johanssen,
who believed that the small word gene was easy to combine with
other words. Easy to read and easy to use. It's not confirmed by some
experimental effect. Still formal, hazy assumptions. So far, we haven't
been able to see genes.
In 1909 Johnson used the term "zygote" to refer to Mendel's
"genetic factor". It was only after Morgan's group published the book
Mendelian Mechanism of Inheritance in 1951 that a comprehensive
and systematic theory of genetics was put forward. Its main argument
does not extend beyond the realm of formal genetics. The gist is:
"Genes are on chromosomes, and one chromosome contains all kinds
of genes." The genes have a certain position on the chromosome, a
certain order, in a straight line. There is often an orderly exchange of
alleles on homologous chromosomes. Genes form gametes according
to Mendel's first and second laws of heredity for separation and free
combination, and the third law of heredity for linkage and exchange.
Up to this point, genes remain invisible, untouchable, chaotic,
omnipotent genetic material. It exists but cannot be captured, it exists
but cannot be seen, only perceived. Both Sutton and Beauvoli had
previously proposed that the chromosome was the basis of Mendel's
laws of inheritance and that there were many different genes on a
single chromosome. This view has also been included in the Morgan
gene theory. In 1921, Muller proposed that genes are tiny particles.
He wants to grind the gene, he wants to cauterize the gene. However,
he did not, like Madame Curie, crystallize radium from burnt asphalt
after several years of persevering experimentation, and let people
really see the structural model of the gene.
Some people think that genes are invisible. Because of this, it is
many physicists, biochemists, cytologists, mathematicians have joined
the ranks of the search for genes, the inheritance of life in-depth,
micro serious study. Famous for physicsIt had nothing to do with
Mendelian inheritance. Morgan looked only for links between natural
mutations in fruit flies and embryology. He also wrote papers arguing
that it is impossible for chromosomes to carry Mendel's genetic
elements. An opponent of Mendelian inheritance. It was not until the
appearance of the white-eyed fruit fly that Morgan's idea was
reversed 180 degrees. The walleye fly brings Morgan to the fulcrum ofglory. The DNAX crystal diffraction pattern also brought Franklin the
same
The fulcrum of... But Franklin failed to grasp this innovative
fulcrum. It can be seen that the role of the fulcrum is greater than the
magic of the gold thread described by Shakespeare, which is really the
soul of scientific innovation.
Through a series of examples, we have also gradually and deeply
improved the understanding of the fulcrum in scientific innovation
plays a decisive breakthrough role. When we split the Macbius tape
with small scissors, we did not have such a precise understanding. Just
like when we were in middle school, the first time we heard that give
me a fulcrum, I will move the whole earth brought the inner shock.
Only the excitement of blood boiling, and did not recognize the true
meaning of the scientists on the essence of the fulcrum.
At that time, we only have a general understanding of the
surface, and only by going deeper and deeper can we approach the
essence of the fulcrum. Feel its magical power. Isn't it? The same
DNAX-ray crystal diffraction pattern was deeply inspired by Watson,
and it took only two weeks to complete the improvement of the DNA
model, achieving a major breakthrough and winning the 1962 Nobel
Prize. With his own wisdom and skills, Franklin, who worked hard to
shoot this precious negative, was unhappy. Eight years later, cancer
took her young and beautiful life. Although she created a scientific
miracle, capturing, discovering and getting the diffraction pattern of
the DNA double helix, the crown of the discovery of the DNA double
helix model should have belonged to her, but she did not miss the
Nobel Prize, and the fate of Watson and Franklin in stark contrast, do
not let us feel the key to capture and use the fulcrum and inflection
point?
Morgan from the standpoint of anti-Mendelian genetic theory,
after the cross-breeding experiment of the white eye fruit fly proved,
without hesitation, betrayed himself to Mendel's great service. This
shows that things are often far away from success and brilliance
because they do not stick to it, and grasping the fulcrum is the key to
success. If Franklin can persist in the Wilkins group, then the rare luck
may fall on her head, she will be the first female scientist to win theNobel Prize after Madame Curie. How outrageous is that? There is
only such a step between success and failure, and there is such a
moment of opportunity between honor and regret. Had Watson not
been able to see Franklin's DNA-X-ray crystal-diffraction pattern, he
and Crick would have been in the old circle of the triple helix for an
unknown amount of time. Maybe you can't walk out of the triple
spiral circle for life, and the Nobel Prize crown is not good.
In the history of science, there are too many examples of the
successful being buried and the successful being unknown! It's not
just female Franklin. Franklin was the first to capture the DNA X-ray
crystallography, so who was the first scientist to discover DNA? It was
Michel. He found the nuclides. Only 70 years later did people
recognize that nuclides are genetic material composed of two
different nucleic acids: DNA and RNA.
In the early 20th century, the genetic role of nucleic acid
molecules was denied, and nucleic acid was considered to be a simple
array of tetranucleotides. However, Mischel, like Mendel, made a
genius prediction, promising: "If we suppose that there is a single
substance that acts as an enzyme or a chemical activator, and is an
important factor in fertilization." Then, no doubt, we think of
nuclides!" This is a clear indication that nuclides are genetic material.
But people have forgotten his prophecy. Because of this forget, we
also
Michelle's research should be written down. Because nuclides
are a fulcrum, a branch of scientific innovation. Miguel is the first
person to discover DNA and the founder of the genetic theory of DNA
life.
Michel, whose full name is Friedrich Michel, is a Swiss scientist.
Born in 1844, he first discovered nuclides at the age of 25. He was
young, had just earned his doctorate, and was full of energy. He
conducted a long-term study of the sperm of the Rhine frog fish. He
was a chemist and a pioneer in the use of chemistry to explore the
secrets of heredity and to contribute greatly to the study of biological
macromolecules. Because the head of the frog fish sperm is all
nuclear, it is very easy to study and observe, which provides
convenience for him to study biological macromolecules and proteins.
Michel discovered a new substance: protamine. To investigate further,Michel went to a nearby hospital to collect discarded surgical gauze
bandages and hydrolyzed them with pepsin to obtain concentrated
cells. She had stumbled upon a new substance that was insoluble, a
nuclear substance that proteases could not break down, and which,
with the action of enzymes, remained intact, but only became smaller.
Miguel performed a chemical analysis of the new substance and gave
it the name "nuclide". Because nuclides are acidic, people later called
nuclides nucleic acids, which are still in use today. However, the real
understanding of nucleic acids, or after the end of World War II.
Progress in DNA research was slow before the war, because the war
made it difficult for scientists to settle into their own research
subjects. More influential was the chemist Kossel, who identified the
four components of DNA. Its smallest structure is deoxyribonucleic
acid. Each nucleotide is made up of three smaller parts: phosphoric
acid, deoxyribose, and base. These four nucleotides are composed of
four different bases: adenine (A), guanine (G), thymocytosis (T), and
cytocytosis (C). Next, Levin proposed the tetranucleotide hypothesis:
that the content of four nucleic acids is the same, no one has an
advantage, and their status is absolutely consistent. So is this
consistency possible in nature for life, which is changing all the time
and everywhere? The Austrian chemist Zaghav raised the same
question. Chagav was born in 1905. After graduating from university
in 1928, he went to the United States to work at Columbia University.
He did a very sophisticated analysis of nucleic acids and realized that
they were unique and complex macromolecular compounds. It should
be a long chain structure of high molecular weight. Although the
number of the four nucleotides varies, there is no certain rule on the
surface, but the essence is regulated. He discovered the number
theory law of 1:1: that is, the ratio of the sum of all purines (A, G) to
the sum of all pyrimidines (C, T) : or that the ratio of A to T, G to C is
always 1:1. The study of heredity is very interesting and always
depends on number theory. From the beginning of Mendel's three
ratios, Mischel, Kossel, Levin, and Chaghav, the four chemists, the
study of the structure of biological macromolecules, and Mendel
finally encountered the number theory of 1:1. Number theory does
not leave the inheritance of life. The deeper the research, the more
obvious the binding force of this mathematics. They are 1:1,
developed into 1:1:1:1, essentially (1:1)×(1·1). As 3:1 develops into:9:3:3:1, the essence is (3:1)×(3:1) and (3:1)×(3:1)×(3:1)... The infinite
nature of their transformations always conforms to 4, 4, 43, 4 "... The
infinity of... It can be seen that DNA inheritance has inherent
mathematical laws. But science is still evolving. The molecular
structure of DNA is not yet understood. Because it's impossible to see
the molecular structure of DNA with a microscope alone. Even a
powerful electron microscope can't help. Because, the molecule of
DNA is
On the nucleus, on a nucleus, the smallest is one micron or 10
centimeters. Strands of DNA are tens of thousands of times longer
than the nucleus in which it resides. So DNA molecules can only be
measured in nanometers. You can't see DAN molecules with an
electron microscope. In fact, we have not yet seen DNA molecules.
Scientist Astbury had an idea. He used the principle that X-rays could
penetrate living organisms to create images on photographic plates.
DNA was studied by X-ray crystallography and the long chain
arrangement of polynucleotide molecules was found. So, in the
middle of the 20th century, Britain and the United States crossed the
ocean and formed the Wilkins, Franklin and Pauling groups to study
the structure of biological macromolecules with X-rays. In the fierce
competition, the superior, flexible mind, with the feminine delicacy of
Franklin made a breakthrough. In November 1951, she obtained a
perfect DNAX-ray crystal-diffraction pattern, thus completing her
historic mission of capturing instantaneous changes in DNA structure.
In this way, Mendel and Morgan started from the classical theory
of formal logic, and while Michel, Kossel, Levin, and Chaghav used
chemical methods to study the inheritance of life, Astbury, Wilkins,
Franklin, and Pauling jointly focused on the mystery of DNA through
X-ray crystal-diffraction diagrams. All the conditions are ripe to
unravel the mystery of DNA's molecular structure. At this time, when
the two teams of the United Kingdom and the United States across
the ocean challenge competition, in full swing. The United States and
the United Kingdom each have a young student, but unexpectedly
meet in London, join hands to join the research and challenge of DNA
molecular structure. Crick, 12 years older than Watson, has a strange
personality, from informal, always talk loudly, but with the quiet
introverted American Watson tacit cooperation. At this time, Wilkinsand Franklin were stalled by personality differences and clamoring to
break up.
November 1951. Franklin obtained the perfect rare DNA X-ray
crystal diffraction pattern. In 1951, at the age of 23, Watson crossed
the Pacific Ocean to meet Crick in England. They absorbed the fighting
spirit of Franklin's failure to do again, making them a giant double star,
radiating a very bright brilliance. "Try again if you fail!" This is the
universal law of scientific innovation. What scientist has not suffered
the throes of failure! Watson and Crick's work on the structural model
of DNA. The first step into the three-chain misunderstanding. The
repetition period was incorrectly calculated to be 28×100 meters.
Even so, they also had the courage to make a major breakthrough in
self-recognition, and announced the three-strand DNA model they
created to the world, and invited many experts and peers. When
Franklin saw the model, he stated the obvious error: "The model
relies too much on the involvement of water molecules." The failure
caused Wallin and Crick more than internal pain, because Watson did
not follow the original project, the scholarship was eventually cut, and
even food became a problem. And Crick, who has always been
unscrupulous, had to restrain himself and temporarily put aside his
DNA to study the long-shelved protein topic. Staying away from
failure is often a subconscious way of defending oneself and
recuperating. However, after a short break, the key to success is to be
able to fail again! It's the same thing with mountain climbing. When
you're halfway up the mountain and you're too tired to breathe, it's
natural to stop and rest. If you return to the mountain after a long
rest or at the end of it, you will lose the opportunity to climb to the
top of the mountain and the possibility of success, and success will
leave you forever. People always have to have a kind of toughness, a
kind of any failure can not break down, drag down the tenacity, talent
and victory,
Success is predestined. In other words, the fulcrum is the
beginning of success; Failure is the mother of success. Once you get
the creative fulcrum, you don't always succeed. Only after failure can
we enter the ranks of scientific giants. Watson and Crick's silence
after their defeat gave them an opportunity to question themselves.
Make them realize that the lack of information in their ownpossession is the biggest drawback. They began to absorb Pauling's
method of constructing DNA models by three-dimensional modeling
with pendulums, abandoning the flat thinking that was simply
outlined with paper and pencil: they thought deeply about the ratio
of all purines (A, G) to all pyrimidines (C, T), or the ratio of A or T, G to
C, which was always 1: And Wilkins and Franklin often talked to each
other about the inner secrets of DNA. When Wilkins showed Watson
a perfectly beautiful DNA X-ray crystallography obtained by Franklin in
November 1951. Wallin's inspiration can be inspired, can be inspired
from the A and T pairing with G and C pairing closely shaped, and
isometric... Seeing the spontaneous internal connection, thus
breaking through the three-strand error, reversing the defeat, and
finally on the road to success, so that Mendel's mysterious DNA,
which has been continuously sought by many scientists of different
nationalities for generations, revealed its own form, revealed its
magical double helix structure, Achieved an epoch-making
breakthrough in the theory of genetics. Many physicists,
mathematicians, biologists, chemists, animal and plant scientists...
With their own specific methods and starting points, in different
locations and different angles to explore, study the secret of life, not
intersecting in the mysterious DNA.
The eighth chapter "The Fulcrum of innovation in the Year"
Innovation theory 2003 edition of science
Historical review13, What is the gene (according to the original
book chapter sequence number)
What exactly is a gene? What glory will arise from this pivot? Is
gene equal to DNA? We may draw inferences from this in order to
continue the fulcrum discussion. The life sciences media often make
no clear and strict distinction between genes and ·DA. However, as a
gene, the smallest unit of the genetic material, it can still be divided
into smaller introns, exons, promoter regions, triplets, bases, etc., so
genes are not exactly equal to DNA." A gene is a fragment of a long
chain of DNA corresponding to a nucleic acid chain, and the concept
of a gene as the smallest element of a genetic object enters the
information area. What if a strand of DNA is a strand of nucleic acid
made up of helices corresponding to nucleic acids, like magnetic tapes
that store encoded information? So a gene is not a single atom ofgenetic information.
On the tape, if the gene is the information bank of the genetic
code (for example, the relationship between 100,000 genes and each
set of genetic code should be corresponding). So a gene is equivalent
to a corresponding set of genetic code... What exactly is a gene?
Again, let's go back to the beginning, the genes were originally
Mendel's genetic factors. Mendel also predicted that genetic factors
are on the chromosome, putting forward the prediction that "genetic
factors are part of the chromosome." In 1899, Johnson replaced
Mendel's genetic factors with genes, only from linguistic rhetoric
considerations, and there was no change in substance. I think "gene"
is a small word that is easy to use and easy to combine with other
words. Morgan then used fruit flies to develop the Morgan gene
theory: that is, individual traits originate from the reproductive
matter linked together to form a number of linked groups of pairs of
elements (genes); When germ cells mature, the two genes in each
pair are separated from each other according to Mendel's first Law.
Thus, each germ cell contains only one set of genes, and the genes
within the different linkage groups combine freely according to
Mendel's second Law. There is also sometimes an orderly exchange of
genes among members of the corresponding locked group. The
frequency of the exchange can provide evidence about the linear
arrangement of the members within each linkage group. At the same
time, it can also show the relative positions of members and
determine the third law of exchange and linkage genetics. Simply put:
Morgan thought of genes as "elements," elements that are linked in
pairs.
In 1868, Michel discovered the "nuclide", which is theoretically
believed to be the modern DNA. Later, they realized that because
nuclides are acidic, scientists changed the nuclides to nucleic acids, so
nucleic acids are DNA. Determining that the carrier of the gene is DNA
was confirmed by Avery's mouse experiments. At first, Griffith only
found the "transformation factor" for the transformation of type S
bacteria into type R bacteria, and Avery confirmed after repeated
experiments that the "transformation factor" was DNA. Remember,
this gene is just genetic material, DNA= nucleic acid. So, what exactly
is a gene? Do genes not equal DNA? Let's look at this equation again.
Nuclide = nucleic acid = deoxyribonucleic acid =DNA= conversionfactor =DNA. There is no obvious equation between genes and them.
Let's leave the cause aside, and let's look at the structure of DNA.
Nucleic acids are made of smaller nucleotides. There are four
types of nucleotides: Kossel identified the four components of DNA, A,
T, C, and G. Chaghav then discovered the ratio of the sum of (A and G)
to the sum of (C and T); Or the ratio of A to T, G to C are in line with
the intrinsic relationship of 1:1 composition ratio. In other words,
DNA is a double helix of two purines and two pyrimidines in a single
base. Three bases determine a phosphate. Phosphoric acid
corresponds to sugar groups - this is Watson and Crick's model of the
structure of DNA. So Crick offered again -... Gene theory. Crick gene
theory: A gene is a sequence of nucleotides in a DA double helix chain,
carrying genetic information that can be expressed under certain
conditions. Or the sequence of nucleotides recorded in DNA for each
piece of information called a gene. This sum of all genes = Crick's
information base. So a gene is just a piece of information on DNA.
Finally, genes become information. Further down, three nucleotides
determine an amino acid. This different sequence of 3:1 forms 64 sets
of genetic code. Deciphering and recombination resulted in genetic
engineering... The development of genetics into the practical stage of
life science is a major breakthrough in life science. At present, people
are eagerly concerned about the deciphering of 100,000 human
genes, the sequencing of the human genome, and people hope that
in the 21st century, genetic engineering will be directed to transform
human beings and create new life. In fact, we humans have been
changing species for thousands of years using naturally developed
methods of targeted breeding. To benefit the needs of human survival
and growth. It is just that before the genetic revolution, the whole
plant was used as the evolutionary basis for directed cultivation by
artificial selection. Today, we take that point down to the genetic level
(atoms).
This doesn't change the whole concept of natural selection. In
other words, humans move from targeted selection at the whole
plant level to targeted selection at the molecular level. It is only the
inevitable process of human understanding of life from macro to
micro development. Just like physics entering the quantum theory
level, it is the inevitable result of the in-depth development of humanunderstanding. In fact, thousands of years, even tens of thousands of
years, hundreds of millions of years. In nature itself, natural selection
begins at the molecular level, even at the subtler particle "string"
level. It just hasn't been discovered or recognized by humans before.
For man can only use the laws of nature, and cannot and must not
create laws that do not exist in nature itself. The laws described above,
from Mendelian factors to genetic engineering, have only been
discovered out of primitive secrecy, and this discovery is far from over.
So far, scientists still can't answer the question of what exactly is a
gene? Can genes, as information, create new life? Are genes the
mechanisms that create new life? In terms of biological phenomena.
A gene is the smallest single bit of genetic material. Are the genetic
atoms of life. Are the genetic atoms of life, and should be indivisible.
If (Crick's theory) genes are information. So information can be
divided. From the chemical structure of organisms, each component
is composed of carbon, hydrogen, ammonia, hydrogen, oxygen,
phosphorus atoms, and has the same chemical composition as
inorganic matter. So how do these inorganic substances get into the
genetic structure? Deep down, we can't answer. Now there's only
assimilation theory... From the ordering of different bases, the three
bases of the gene template are connected by the corresponding
glycosyl-phosphate and phospho-sugar groups at both ends. The
instructions for the linkage of sugar and phosphoric acid come from
genes, but what are the mechanisms and forces for the linkage and
separation of sugar and phosphoric acid? From the theory of entropy
and the microcycle theory of cosmic energy, the energy
transformation is orderly. Released energy
Quantity must first absorb energy. If the flow of energy stops, it
immediately arises and reaches thermodynamic equilibrium. The
living opal system dies in an instant. This is what the second law of
thermodynamics says about life. Therefore, the gene chatter caused
by bioenergy flow is the inevitable result of the energy flow vibration
of the bioenergy conversion of tiny particles related to the neutrino
level of life.
Should genes (information) be a perpetual flow, a quivering
stream of biological energy? And the gene isn't just in the
chromosomal body. DNA molecules are present in both mitochondriaand chloroplasts. They are also replicators, equipped to synthesize
proteins. We might as well use genetic theory (information theory) to
test to know. Genes from their birth (Mendel's genetic factors) are
purely conceptual concepts. To Crick genes = information. Is
information equal to the genetic material of life? We don't have an
answer yet. Because it's true that we haven't seen DNA yet. The most
powerful electron microscope in the world can only magnify an object
250,000 times. To see the double helix structure (DNA) alone requires
a magnification of 10 billion times. This is currently out of reach.
Therefore, only indirect chemical amplification can be taken, and the
observation is not an individual pair of images (such as proteins,
double helices). Because life is an inseparable living integer system:
that is, every step of life is irreversible and can not stop running,
integer one-way continuous overall system network. So it's impossible
to see how living DNA works. Even Franklin's November 1951 X-ray
crystal-diffraction pattern of DNA is a ephemeral negative of the
workings of a community (just a dynamic feedback of tiny collections
of individuals by biochemical means breaking down living systems), a
masterpiece of chance. How much necessity is reflected in this?
Probability theory expresses the correctness of the law of pure
chance, if it is one in 1.02 million. Can we doubt the fulcrum effect of
Franklin's DNA X-ray crystaldiffraction pattern on the uniqueness of
Watson's and Crick's DNA models? Gene is a generalization of the
genetic phenomena of life that cannot be seen, touched or smelled,
and it is not a real entity. In terms of biological phenomena, genes are
the smallest units of genetic material. Can be likened to the atom of
heredity, derived from Mendel's genetic factors. But why can genes
be arbitrarily broken down, arbitrarily cut, arbitrarily recombined,
arbitrarily combined? ... It is also possible that the decomposition,
cutting, recombination and combination of living molecules are
natural laws inherent in living cells. It's not genetic. Just like when we
break down water molecules into H20, it's natural, not information. In
the same way, we can use 0 to synthesize water under certain
conditions. Because the organic world is the same as the inorganic
world.
But genes can be modified. And then put it back into the
organism. How does that explain it? It all comes down to its essence.
So genes belong to nature. Suppose we cut out a link from a gene andadd a new link from a human culture. Reinsert the modified gene...
This is a universal function of living cells themselves. Just like a gecko
can automatically attach a severed tail, which is an inherent function
of living cells. What about the idea that genes can be stored dry and
dry? This is still nature. For thousands of years, tens of thousands of
years, hundreds of millions of years, seeds are swaying in the autumn
wind, losing water, dry storage. After a harsh winter, spring came.
Earlier, we talked about the miracle of thousand-year-old lotus seeds
blossoming in the Beijing Botanical Garden. It's the ingenuity of
nature. The gene in the seed can naturally dry, dry and immortal,
immortal, and remain alive
The vitality of life. So how do we know that genes can be
synthesized in test tubes?
The synthesis of genes in test tubes is a linguistic disease from
the beginning of the formation of the concept of genes. Conceptual
stuff, how can information be put in a test tube? What we put in the
test tube is some artificial combination of nucleic acid strands, which
we can still say belong to nature. So why are genes readable? Let's
take a look at how a basis is readable. This begins with the sequencing
of the nucleic acid, usually by chemical degradation and radioactive
labeling. In this way, the nucleic acid chain is cut into a component
(this is essentially a normal biological chemical reaction of an enzyme)
to produce a special mark on the end of the chain, and the same
reason for chromosomes. The electric field action, which is natural,
can cause the cut chain to be arranged in a certain length. We can
read the gene sequence directly by identifying specific markers at the
end of the chain that indicate pyrimidine or purine (A and T, G and C).
Please note: ① We interpret nucleic acid sequencing. The
decomposition of nucleic acids by enzymes is a naturally occurring
biochemical reaction. ·③ Our special labeling uses naturally
occurring chemical staining techniques, including radiolabelling. ④
The decomposed chains must be rearranged after the enzymatic
reaction. Observing the rearranged nucleic acids from the markers,
one can certainly find the changed arrangement order. This is genetic
readable. The essence of this process is the nucleic acid changes
before and after the enzyme reaction, as well as special labeling. Just
as Mendel saw red or white flowers when he harvested them, heused the biochemical reactions and genetic laws of life that exist
naturally. And it's not genes that are involved, it's nucleic acids.
What's readable is the sequence of nucleic acids, not genes. We
describe here the various properties of genes used in genetic
engineering.
Emphasize that all functions of genes are purely natural. It was
made by nature. It is not to deny the development of human
understanding of life; It is not to deny the practical role of genetic
engineering for major breakthroughs in life science theory. Indeed,
the human understanding from Darwinian natural selection of the
entire individual life genetic phenomenon, into the Mendel-Crick
atomic level of life genetic phenomenon. The revelation of this law is
a scientific breakthrough in itself, but it does not mean that genes are
everything in life. Tomorrow, the theory of genes will go deeper and
deeper into the nucleus. There will be more dramatic breakthroughs.
Now scientists have carried out beach-like research on cell
membranes, which can prove it. That is to say, there are macroscopic
natural selection and microscopic natural selection. Darwin focused
on the former, while Mendel Crick expounded the law of the latter.
Both are inherent laws of nature. Throughout the theory and practice
of life genetics - a clone, a genetic engineering, a legacy code... It can
only be defined in the cell stage (cell to cell). An extremely early point
of contact before the embryo is formed. When embryonic cells form
and evolve into organs or tissues, cloning is used to achieve complete
integration. It is simply impossible for a living body to produce a
whole genetic phenomenon. Let's say we transplant an organ from an
individual animal. Assuming full integration has been achieved, can its
crossbred offspring acquire the organ traits of paternal or maternal
transplant integration? Of course not. This is like a person replaced
with someone else's kidney, he recovered, sexual intercourse
produced offspring can develop two different kidney organs?
Obviously not. This defines cloning as existing only at the cellular level.
This is the same reason that young willow strips can be inserted into a
forest, and the thick trunk of a willow tree can not survive and
reproduce if it is sawed off and inserted in the soil
Same.
In a suitable environment, any living cell has the ability ofholographic replication and regeneration of individual life. It is the
most secret function and the last defense nature has left for living
individuals to reproduce and avoid species extinction. This has been
hidden for billions of years, as natural as a seed falling into the right
environment to germinate. Cloning needs no shock, because it does
not create a supernatural law of life. That is to say, cloning is not
beyond nature's means of microscopic selection for life. Human twins
are the product of natural cloning. We still believe that man (science)
cannot create laws that do not exist in nature itself. Cloning is also a
law. It is a law of life that has existed since the beginning of nature.
This is why cloned sheep can only clone Dolly under the various
sexual constraints of sheep, and cannot clone the individual life of
animals outside the sheep breed. Because this kind of restriction
mechanism is the strictest mechanism of nature, this strictness comes
from the complexity and order of life. Any small one of the individual
livesThe result. This kind of natural selection of individual life should
include the complex life chain between individual life, between
individual and population, between population and population, and
the multilevel natural selection of individual community in large life
field. In fact, the existence of such complex ordered choices is
field-specific. Just like the invisible existence of Newton's gravitational
field, the gravitational effect occurs. Natural selection is also a special
kind of invisible field. This field action sustains and integrates the
evolution and development of the whole life. We call it the life force
field. This is a universal field of life vitality. The real existence of this
vitality field can be proved from the mechanism of the universal
existence of genetic genes in the individual cells of plants and animals,
microorganisms and all living things. Similarly, the nature of gravity
field and electromagnetic field is the field energy cycle of energy field.
Any living individual cells and genes have no choice but to adapt to
the energy field cycle inherent in this universal life force field.
From the bigger picture of the big life field of the universe. There
are two major energy cycle systems, the inorganic energy cycle and
the organic energy cycle. These two energy cycle systems each have
different systems, different levels, different levels of energy
conversion of different cycle systems. The energy conversion at each
level is manifested in the energy microcycle process. Also at the
interface between the organic and inorganic worlds, the energy cycleis through the tiny green leaves of plants
Body (element) to achieve. This is the best proof of the
microcirculation of energy in the universe. The microcirculation of
cosmic energy is silent. Let's look at photosynthesis. We can't see it
with our eyes, we can't hear it with our ears, and the thinking
between us and the green plants can't be perceived. We can only
copy the current book theory: the chlorophyll in the cells of green
plants, constantly absorbing the energy of sunlight. "While converting
light energy into biochemical energy, we slowly assimilate inorganic
matter bit by bit to achieve a microcycle of energy and matter from
inorganic to organic."
"So? What about genes? What role should genes play in the
microcycle of life's most important and fundamental energy
conversion? Is it possible that genes only exist in the genetic
phenomenon of life, used for genetic code, genetic engineering,
cloning... Is there no other use?" See if this touches a fulcrum of
scientific innovation. If genes, chlorophyll, and sunlight can work into
new biotechnologies, mankind's dependence on petroleum energy
will end forever.
Chapter 9: Franklin's indelible DNA achievements
A beautiful female scientist Franklin's "nominal degree"
In 1930, Franklin was a young and beautiful student at St Paul's
Girls' School in London.
In 1938 he entered Newnham College, Cambridge, which was
founded in 1871 and is one of three distinctive women's colleges in
Cambridge. Located in the west of the river CAM, the campus area is
very large, the architectural style is basically red rooms and white
Windows, as well as carefully arranged gardens and fountains, the
campus is very beautiful. Cambridge's largest women's college, about
400 undergraduates, about 150 graduate students, academicians
about 70 people, a very distinctive college. Franklin completed her
studies in 1941, when the University of Cambridge did not award a BA
Cantab to women, so Franklin had only a "degree titular".
A drawing left in Franklin's reading notes revealed that in 1939
she had conceived of the chemical structure of DNA and drawn aspiral pattern. It can be seen that the diffraction diagram of 1951
Franklin had already had it in mind - success is for the prepared mind!
Two Franklin received his doctorate after World War II and
entered King's College
In August 1942, with the demands of the Second World War,
Franklin joined the British Coal Utilisation Association at Kingston
upon Thames, publicising the porosity of coal and the study of strong
carbon fibres;
Franklin received his Ph.D. in physical chemistry in 1945 for his
thesis "Physical Chemistry of the Special Relations of Solid organic
Graphite with Coal and Related Substances."
In 1946, he went to Paris, France, to work at the National Central
Chemical Laboratory there. In 1950, Franklin was appointed to a post
at King's College London.
In January 1951, Franklin began Research at King's College,
where she served as a member of the Medical Research Council
(MRC), a biophysical research unit chaired by physicist John Randall.
Randall decided Franklin's research topic was to shift from X-ray
crystal diffraction of proteins, assigning the transition to the study of
the chemical structure of DNA.
Principle and algorithm of three diffraction patterns
Diffraction pattern principle: In classical physics, waves are bent
and dispersed to varying degrees after passing through obstacles such
as slits, holes, or disks. If an obstacle is placed between the light
source and the viewing screen, there will be bright areas and dark
areas in the viewing screen, and the boundaries of these areas are
not sharp, which is a complex pattern of light and dark. This
phenomenon, called diffraction, can occur whenever a wave
encounters an obstacle in its path. In addition, a similar effect occurs
when a light wave passes through a medium with an uneven
refractive index, or when a sound wave passes through a medium
with an uneven acoustic impedance
The effect of... Under certain conditions, not only water waves
and light waves can produce diffraction visible to the naked eye.
coherence
Radiography; Coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) is a technique
for imaging two-dimensional or three-dimensional objects byobtaining wavefront phase information through object wave
diffraction or interference light field intensity distribution.
Coherent diffraction imaging (CDI) is the process of recovering
the original image of an object from the diffraction distribution. The
complex amplitude function of object wave optical field consists of
two parts: amplitude and phase. The amplitude information of object
wave field diffraction or interference light field can be easily obtained
by photographic film or digital image sensor such as CCD, but the
image sensor cannot directly detect the phase information of the
wave front. To recover the original image, that is, to reconstruct the
object wave function, it is necessary to know the amplitude
information and phase information at the same time.
There are three main iterative algorithms:
1. GS algorithm
GS algorithm is also known as error reduction algorithm. In the
alternating iterative calculation process of the object wave function in
the spatial domain and the frequency domain, the spatial intensity
distribution and the frequency domain intensity distribution, as a
single iterative constraint, have the problem of convergence
overlapping "stagnation".
2. HIO algorithm
The improved error reduction ER algorithm and the hybrid
input-output HIO algorithm are further developed to overcome the
criticality problem and are widely used in phase diffraction imaging.
3. TIE algorithm
The basic principle is to measure the change of light intensity
along the direction of light propagation and calculate the phase
distribution in the vertical direction. At present, the more commonly
used method to solve TIE equation is Fourier transform; GS algorithm;
HIO algorithm; ER algorithm; The core idea of phase recovery
algorithm based on intensity measurement is to calculate the phase
information from the intensity information by solving the light
intensity propagation equation (TIE).
The equation of light intensity propagation (TIE) can be written
as:; Because iterative algorithms usually have the problems of large
computation and overlapping convergence, wavefront detection and
diffraction imaging methods based on wavefront modulation or
sampling are proposed.The basic idea of this method is: (a) introduce a wavefront
modulation or sampling element with a specific transmittance
distribution between the sample under test and the recording plane
of the image sensor...
The three-dimensional concept of the four-Franklin A-type
diffraction pattern implies quantum properties
The young Franklin used X-ray diffraction techniques to make
clear diffraction patterns of DNA crystals in 1950. There are three
types of DNA known in nature, from left to right, type A, type B, and
type Z.
In 1950, Wilkins obtained (free of charge) a pure DNA sample
from the Swiss scientist Rudolf Signer, which was extracted from the
calf thymus and whose properties were suitable for X-ray diffraction
analysis. When it dries, it forms small clusters of needles, and when
exposed to moisture, it turns into a sticky mass. Franklin and Gosling
later discovered two types of DNA. When wet, the fibers of DNA
become longer and thinner, called type A. When dry, it becomes
shorter and thicker, called type B.
In November 1951, Franklin presented an X-ray diffraction
pattern of type A DNA and conducted an experiment
90 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
The speech said:
"The phosphates in the DNA molecule are on the outside, and
the bases are on the inside" structure, and calculate the axis, distance,
and diameter and length of the helix inside the DNA molecule. These
conclusions provide an important basis for the establishment of DNA
double helix structure model. Phosphoric acid groups form the
backbone of two polynucleotide chains on the outside of the helix,
which are parallel to each other but opposite in direction. The bases
are on the inside of the helix, in pairs. As the picture shows:
Watson was studying protein structure in William Lawrence
Bragg's Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University; Watson and
Crick learned about the Franklin diffraction pattern, and immediately
tried to arrange the helix structure of DNA, hitting on a "triple helix"model; Franklin, Wilkins, and Greens were invited to visit, and
Franklin read the criticism that it was "too dependent on water
molecules"... Franklin's criticism directly led to Watson and Crick
being terminated by Bragg for DNA structure research! ...
Five of the only obituaries in the history of science to mourn the
double helix of type A DNA
An obituary by Franklin and Gosling commemorating the double
helix of type A DNA (crystalline DNA). At that time, most of the King's
scientists had accepted that the structure of type B DNA was helical,
and Franklin remained skeptical that type A DNA was also helical.
Franklin and Gosling jokingly wrote an obituary to mourn the loss of
the spiral structure of crystalline DNA (type A DNA).
Although it is a "joke" mourning picture completely and fully
exposed Franklin's character characteristics of not being willing to lag
behind, abandoning the old and forging ahead:
Type A DNA Double Helix Obituary:
DNA diffraction image
The symmetry of the seven A-type DNA forms the double helix
structure
In November 1952, Franklin also proposed and explained the
symmetry of type A DNA, meaning that the structure of DNA looks
the same even if it is flipped 180 degrees. 66666 In view of this, type
A DNA symmetry constitutes the double helix structure! The findings
were included in an "MRC report" to be presented to the visiting
committee.
In November 1952, Linus Pauling also began to study the
structure of DNA and suggested that DNA should have bases on the
outside and phosphoric acid on the inside; The structure of DNA was
confirmed as a triple helix, and a paper was published. Franklin had
personally sent Linus Pauling a letter pointing out the error...
Here, the core discussion is "the internal structure of the doublestrand (double helix) : the outer phosphate and the inner base or
'triple helix'".
More than a month later, in January 1953, Wilkins quietly
showed Photo 51 to Watson
After explaining Franklin's results in detail, Watson and Crick
immediately made a historic breakthrough, churning out a
3,000-word article within two weeks, which was published in the
British scientific journal Nature on April 25, 1953.
Here, why is it paired with a thousand-word essay and a Wilkins
and Franklin certified article? This is still a mystery for ages!
Ten years later, in 1962, Watson won the Nobel Prize along with
Crick and WilkinsEight or three papers published at the same time in
Nature show that the first original is misplaced
The first originator of 51DNA diffraction images was Franklin (in
January 1953, Wilkins quietly showed photo 51 to Watson and
explained Franklin's results in detail, Watson and Crick immediately
made a historic breakthrough), which is a kind of intellectual property
theft, Therefore, when Nature published 3,000 words, Bragg and
Landauer questioned and intervened, and Nature had to publish three
papers simultaneously on April 25, 1953.
Watson and Crick first, then Wilkins et al., then Franklin -- put
the cart before the horse!
Franklin's paper, co-published with Gosling, was titled
"Molecular Configuration in Sodium Thymonucleate."
Although Watson and Crick mentioned in their paper that they
were inspired by Wilkins and Franklin, they did not elaborate on the
decisive breakthrough role of "Figure 51", much less acknowledge it.
What's more, Wilkins and Franklin reported in their paper that
their data matched Watson's and Crick's models.
And so tragedy struck: in March 1953, Franklin left King's College
and enrolled at Birkbeck College, London, leaving her research
entirely behind. At this time, Wilkins also wrote a letter to Crick,
saying that the "Darklady" (referring to Franklin) had left their
laboratory and could finally begin to advance toward the secrets of
nature - the "feminist" who had completed the historical mission of
DNA structure became the "dark lady" and died of depression!
Nine "Dark Lady" immortal great goddess scientistIn 1944, scientists experimentally proved that deoxyribonucleic
acid DNA is true biological genetic material, but no one has been able
to analyze the structure of DNA. In 1939, while studying at Cambridge
University, Rosalind Franklin sketched out the chemical structure of
DNA, a spiral pattern, in her reading notes. Franklin was born in a
Jewish family in the United Kingdom, with a strong personality, a
monograph of ideas, with some "feminist activists" breath, can be
described as a heresy in the male academic circle, destined to be a
goddess scientist who has influenced the ages!
In 1951, Franklin's outstanding X-ray diffraction analysis
technique was distinguished by the British physicist John Blue
As soon as Franklin entered the lab, he threw himself into his
work.
Franklin
In May 1952, Franklin and Greins, after deep research, took an
X-ray crystal diffraction photograph of B-type DNA, which was praised
by John Bell as "the most beautiful X-ray photograph ever!"
In stark contrast, why did Wilkins accuse Franklin of being the
"Dark lady"?
Perhaps Franklin was a little egoistic and arrogant, too attached
to scientific research, in the process of Wilkins and Franklin
cooperation, not obey, often make Wilkins very unhappy; Wilkins
thought Franklin was his assistant, but Franklin insisted from
beginning to end that he was an independent subject leader, showing
a talented, experimental master of female scientists style! Consistent
monograph experiment! Work! Research! Success!
Rosalind Elsie Franklin's May 1952 diffraction image of a DNA
crystal, Photo 51, and the data related to this material are the key
material evidence for the Nobel Prize-winning scientific discovery of
the structure of DNA by James Watson and Francis Crick, a kind of
intellectual property theft. In 1958, Franklin died of bronchial
pneumonia and ovarian cancer.In honor of Franklin's great achievements, Europe and Russia
jointly developed a Mars rover
He was named "Rosalind Franklin." The rover is scheduled to
launch on July 25, 2020, and land on the surface of Mars in February
2021, searching for signs of life on the Red Planet and carrying out
various missions - the very reason for Franklin's success at the
University of London; Although he died four years early and missed
the Nobel Prize, he is indeed connected with the BNA Nobel Prize
with bones and tendon, but he died young at the age of 38, missed
the Nobel Prize, and is still a great goddess scientist who has been
immortal!
The tenth chapter, The Law of Global Plate Heredity, witness and
discuss the comparison between the Big Bang global life theory and
the latest genetic theory of Western scientists
1. "There may be more fundamental mechanisms to be
discovered," says Carmen Sapienza of Temple University. "I think we
have entered the most interesting time since genetics."
▲ We put forward the "species restriction mechanism" - "The
whole plate genetic law"!
2. S.Mattick, director of the Institute of Molecular Biology,
University of Queensland, Australia, said:
"I think this is going to be a classic case of orthodoxy distorting
an objective analysis of facts for 25 years." The failure to fully
appreciate the significance of these facts, especially the possibility
that non-coding sequence interventions could transmit parallel
messages in the form of RNA molecules, could be one of the greatest
mistakes in the history of molecular biology."
We believe that the root of the error lies in the departure from
the essence of "holistic biology" : life is a whole! Therefore, the local
starting point of experimental science, often leads to the
phenomenon of tunneI vision, which has now exposed the limitations
of reverse genetics.
3. Shinii Hirotsune, Saitama Medical University, Japan, May 2003
Led by a team of geneticists, they report the discovery of the first
functional pseudogene.▲ We put forward the concept of "blind gene" in the draft of
"The Law of the Whole Plate Genetics" - in the paper of "the Q Law of
Four Theories", we emphasized that "from Mendel and Morgan to
Barbara. At McClintock's genetic level, genetic genes are experimental
proofs of the existence of plate genes. Plate genes not only prove the
real existence of the overall plate genetic system engineering
regulatory system of life, but also express the deeper meaning of the
existence of blind genes (genes that cannot express their functions).
And blind genes may transform successful genes. Genes with this
function can express certain corresponding life traits. ..." The "Whole
Plate genetic law" was read out in the water conservancy Building of
Tsinghua University on April 15, 2004, and the concept of "blind
genes" was proposed earlier than the report of Hiroshi Shinji of
Saitama Medical University in Japan.
4. "The nice thing about RNA is that it has a special sequence, so
it's digital, like a zip code," says S.Mattick.
The digitization of life and the specific restriction mechanism are
the core of the overall block genetic law. Therefore, the Chinese
expression of the whole plate genetic law is: "Any species trait of the
organism is hidden in the digital program of the whole plate genetic
code square, which constitutes the overall species restriction
mechanism to ensure the continuation of the species." The only
alternative to disrupting the genetics of the entire plate is individual
death and species extinction." Therefore, the digital representation of
the whole plate genetic law is the life helix, and the mathematical
expression is the J-Q equation.
5. It is reported that in 2004, CDC began to use the strain of the
1997 Hong Kong avian influenza outbreak and the human influenza
virus commonly used in laboratories to produce hybrid viruses. No
matter the recombination experiment and the disappearance of the
avian influenza virus (H5N1) in 6 years, it was not until the South
Asian avian influenza outbreak in 2003-2004. Neither artificial
selection nor natural selection can make the H5N1 strain and human
influenza virus recombine and mutate to produce a human world
influenza outbreak. Thus, the scientists found that the H5N1 (avian)
and human influenza viruses (H3N2 or H1N1) had many obstacles to
recombination, and could not explain these phenomena. So why can'tH5N1 combine with H3N2 and H1N1 and mutate to produce zoonotic
super-recombinant viruses? It is the phylogenetic restriction
mechanism that prevents the recombination and mutation of human
and animal influenza viruses. Any variant that crosses the species line
will be eliminated, even at the cost of (artificially natural) selection for
the death of its variant and the extinction of the species in order to
ensure the continuation of the species. The result is a
super-recombinant flu virus. As a result, it appears that there are
many obstacles to recombination of different viruses.
In the Law of the Whole Plate Heredity, we elaborate: "What is
the specific restriction mechanism?"
It is the natural selection of species to balance the whole plate
genes with the mathematics of life. It can be seen that the purpose of
specific restriction is to control the systematic regulation of functional
gene expression invariable traits and freely combinable traits
variation through the preferred permutation ratio of the digital life
code. The expression of a gene for a life trait is entirely a systematic
engineering controlled by this mechanism." As (Observe) noted:
"The H5N1 strain has always been a threat to human health. Up
to 23 of the 34 people infected in Vietnam and Thailand this year
have died. However, to date, all confirmed cases have been in contact
with infected birds. There is no evidence of human-to-human
transmission of the virus."
6, Nobel winner Bishop found that the original cancer cell
mutation, all cancer cells have a "relative specificity", every cancer
cell and the original gene cancer cell is a "relative", every cancer cell
can not cross this "relative specificity", which and human and animal
influenza virus can not reorganize, the same mechanism of mutation
obstacles. All from the species restriction mechanism!
We can boldly predict that even if a worldwide viral influenza
pandemic were to break out tomorrow, there would be no
human-to-human (H5N1+ H3N2 or H1N1) recombinant mutant
influenza disaster.
7. R.Breaker's laboratory at Yale University in the United States
discovered the genetic switch. In August 2003, Breaker and
collaborators reported that a family of ribose switches controlled at
least 26 expressions in BaciIIus subtiIis, a common kitchen bacterium.
As for the overall concept of "gene expression", we have putforward in the Law of Global Plate Genetics. That is: "Blind genes may
transform successful genes."
The function of the gene is to express a corresponding life trait -
plate genes are equivalent to the overall encryption of key letters. It is
the language for the interlocking of whole plates of genes beyond the
"base sequence" hidden by Watson and Crick from DNA models. It is
another set of living replication mechanisms of genetic material as a
whole. This mechanism has greater secrecy, especially because it is
subject to temporal genes..." This is the whole plate gene linkage
encryption a new concept of "gene expression"...
8. The wholeness of life is self-generated by the cell itself.
Western scientists have long understood the whole nature of life at
the cellular level. In 1600 Hooke discovered that cells were named
after ceII or ceIIs (small room, living room). Hooke's use of ceII or ceIIs
to describe the cell emphasized that the macromolecules of life were
a whole concept. Life must be active, it must be an intrinsically
enclosed "chamber" - an infinite collection of the smallest
independent systems. Softness is determined by the inherent water
solubility of life. In fact, Hooke's "little grid" is the life of some liquid
containing complex chemical components; It is a self-supporting,
self-reproducing living organization, which constitutes an infinite
collection of system macromolecules (small lattice-small room) of a
soft closed system. It is the basic life unit of life structure. With
botanist Matthias. In Schlesch's words, "The cell is the smallest unit
that has a life of its own."
▲ What needs to be emphasized today is system and softness.
That is, the wholeness of life and non-rigid movement of life. Because
all cells are derived from living ceII cells, their differentiation can only
be self-organized differentiation within a soft-closed system, which
fully expresses the "whole from whole" nature of life. Since all cells
are derived from cells, the wholeness of life during the embryonic
period is formed. How do you prove the wholeness of life during the
embryonic period? Let us take a human example, the process of two X
chromosomes in women, and the hidden X chromosome in the
female embryo is the whole plate gene linkage and encryption of the
new concept of "gene expression", and it is also the most powerful
proof of the whole plate inheritance. Women inherit two active Xchromosomes, and men inherit one chromosome less than women. A
female embryo must hide an X chromosome, leaving it in a blind,
genetically inactive state to effectively prevent its cells from acquiring
double the number of X chromosomes.
9, American scientists research pointed out: "Two parts of the
genome mechanism together shut down the third part." A noncoding
gene called Xist produces an active RNA that blocks unwanted X
chromosomes, while the needed chromosome produces antisense
RNA that acts as a kind of antidote to protect the X chromosome from
Xist gene suppression. A chain reaction spreads along unwanted
chromosomes: methyl groups label most of the DNA, histones strip
acetyl compounds from their tails, and chromatin compresses into a
hard-to-access, RNA-closed mass. As the female develops, the silent X
chromosome is then passed on to every cell produced by the genome
and remains inactivated."
▲ This is the genome and proteome of the system; Instruction,
information to execution, function... The whole process of life
movement (including space, time, living cell body, self-reproduction).
The Law of Global Plate Heredity not only restricts the bottleneck
of molecular biology and reverse genetics; It also restricts the
research and development of proteome. Genes are the information of
life, and proteins are the executors of biological functions. Genes
transmit information, transcribe and translate instructions; It and the
protein function is carried out as a whole system process. Information,
execution and function are closely matched, and there is also a
problem of the principle of life dynamics. With power, there is the
process of life, and there is the activity of life. 10, the activity of genes,
the operation of proteome functions, are inseparable from the power
of life. Without life dynamics, everything is virtual and inanimate. egg
proteome is "a hybrid of pROEin and genoME," meaning "the
complete set of proteins expressed by a genome." So it doesn't leave
the platform of the genome. This is Australian scientist It was
proposed in 1994 by Marc Wiikins, who initiated the establishment of
the Proteome Research Centre at the Australian Laboratory. Ten
countries have participated in the study in ten years, and great
achievements have been made, and clinical proteomics programs
have been implemented.A gene corresponds to a few to a dozen proteins, and cells are
made of thousands of proteins. How do proteins work in cells? Can it
be removed from the overall workings of the cell? The wholeness of
life is a subject that proteomics development must face.
11. The Human Genome Project, begun by Reto Dubock on
March 7, 1986, has been completed after 17 years. Encoded genes
account for only 2% of the human genome, and 98% of the gene
function is still unknown. In 20 years, when the ambitious human
proteome project is completed, will the proteome on the genome
platform be able to surpass the 2% platform window? Can the
proteome project, 100 times more difficult than the genome project,
break through the bottleneck of the integrity of life?
Because we have to cross 2% of the genome's coding platform!
Even if the coding platform of 2% of the genome is crossed, how to
face the fact that proteins and genes are also small links in the overall
movement chain of life, often produce or lead to tunneI vision? ?
▲ We believe that "holistic biology" is the hope of tomorrow's
life sciences... 20 years later, considering the tunneI vision of
proteomics, it is better to open the door of "holistic biology" today!
12. StanIey B. Prusiner, Professor of the University of California,
San Francisco, won the Nobel Prize in 1997 for his discovery of prions
in 1982. Prions pose a major challenge to molecular biology. They are
the only infectious agent so far that does not contain any nucleic acid
material, and they do not need to repeat the DNA message to induce
the creepy mad cow disease. Causes fatal chronic degenerative
diseases of the central nervous system (Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease,
mad cow disease, mad deer disease, scrapie in sheep, feline
spongiform encephalopathy, infectious ferret leukoencephalopathy,
tremor...) "Prions can be spontaneously produced," or even "any
mammal can spontaneously produce prions." B. Prusiner recently
wrote, "But here's the most shocking thing: Prions aren't always bad."
In fact, all laboratory animals to date have prion proteins encoded in
them. The normal conformation of prion protein PrPc is mainly found
in nerve cells and may help maintain the function of neurons. But it
can change into PrPcs with abnormal conformation and cause
disease." PrPc The change of PrPcs' work energy has nothing to do
with DNA, and prions are just protein particles.
PrPcs is the most typical expression pattern of life's "whole fromwhole" variation. The West believes that mad cow disease is caused
by "meat-and-bonemeaI" (meat-and-bonemeai), but the mechanism
of the mutation from food into PrPc to PrPcs has gone beyond the
platform of genes and proteomics, and scientists are still unable to
explain it. We believe that the "meat-and-bonemeaI" caused by mad
cow disease should be derived from "raw.
Principles of biodynamics "to explore. We regard the cause of
mad cow disease as "bioenergetic hunger". The detailed theory
comes from the Principles of Biodynamics.
13. From the history of human life science, biology is the product
of replacing "natural philosophy" in the 19th century, which was first
proposed by Lamarck; Genetics is created from the ancient
speculation about the nature of life such as "inheritance" or
"hereditary nature". In the early 20th century, the modern genetics
was broken through by the botanists of three different countries, de
Vries, Collins and Cushmak, who rediscovered Mendel's genetic law at
the same time, and was soon developed by Morgan. In particular,
Chaghav's proof developed into modern molecular biology. However,
scientists were more interested in the application of gene theory than
Mendel's large community experiments, which led to the rapid
development of molecular biology into genetic engineering, reverse
genetics, and the development of commercial patents in genomics
and the Genome Project.
It can be seen that modern molecular biology has only inherited
Mendel's simplicity and the application of single traits, and has
developed deeply into reverse genetics. But forget the fact that
complex traits are often controlled by many genes; The theoretical
value of life in terms of population level, gene block and
species-controlling mechanism of the whole biology is forgotten.
Therefore, we say that replacing the whole science of life with biology
and molecular biology is the biggest mistake in the history of science!
In fact, there are four essential elements of any living thing. Namely:
time, space, living cell body, self-reproduction. So molecular biology
can't leave time genes and self-reproduction alone to replace the
study of the whole life sciences; In particular, it neglects the nature of
life that the space environment and living cell body exist in the same
time and the same movement of life genes and proteomes. Thephenomenon of tunneI vision makes us have to reflect on the myth
that only 2% of the genetic code that emphasizes self-reproduction
(one element) can fully understand and master the laws of life science,
which is the truth that all scientists know. Therefore, it will be an
inevitable historical trend of the development of the history of life
science to leapfrog molecular biology with holistic life science!
Chapter 11: A Summary and discussion of the Theory of "The
Law of Global Plate Heredity" and "Specific Restriction Mechanism"
with the latest genetic theories of Western scientists (continued)
1. "Cell from cell" is the overall basis of holistic biology, which
deduces the life system of "whole from whole" and "order from
order", constituting the wholeness and stability of individual life and
species. From the perspective of the research direction of the new
hot subject "systems biology" in recent years, it is only limited to the
overall description of cell function, that is, the overall function
analysis of cells, focusing on biological information, and has not left
the platform of segmentation of life and standardized information
application of DNA quantitative data. Why don't scientists take the
study of the whole function of cells as an opportunity to understand
the objective law of "whole life science"? As early as the middle of the
18th century, Buffon, a Western scientist, recognized that living
species are "objective and basic facts" in nature. Therefore, we define
species as a whole, and believe that species is "a whole that does not
depend on number and time; The same and always living whole; A
whole that can be counted as one of God's creations, and therefore a
single unit of God's creations."
If we change "God" to "nature", we can more truly reflect the
objective law of life as a whole, and get rid of the limitations of god
and religion in Buffon's time. The fundamental reason for the overall
nature of the species of life, as stated by Buffon: "Because each
species is a separate creation." Its first individual is the model for its
offspring; A species is a whole separated by some unbridgeable gulf.
In fact, the wholeness and stability of species do not only come from
the wholeness and stability of cells, but the more important law is
that the wholeness and stability of species come from the specificrestriction mechanism. Today's high technology can not deny that
species is a whole, and the deeper we go into life science research,
the more obvious this overall species restriction will be. As Linne's
Systema Naturae (1735) sums up the nature of species:
"(1) Since there is no new species; (2) since one kind of life
always produces creatures of its kind; (3) Since each individual of each
species is always the beginning of its offspring, the immutability of
these ancestors must be attributed to some all-knowing God, who is
called God, His work is to create everything in the world - (we call God
the seed control mechanism) as evidenced by the mechanisms,
principles, laws, constitutions, and feelings of every living individual."
When we replace this passage in (3) - (some all-knowing God,
this God is called God, whose work is to create everything in the
world) with a "species constraint mechanism", we have a modern
version of the overall principle of Linne species classification. For
Linnais captures the most essential attribute of species: "Every living
thing is born from an egg; And what comes out of each egg is an
offspring that closely resembles the parent." So reproduction
increases the number of individuals without increasing the number of
species. Therefore, the "specific restriction mechanism" forms the
integrity and stability of species; Only stable species characteristics
can become the basic unit and source of classification
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 101
Then; The dual nomenclature (genus name and species name) is
still in use today.
2. One of the proverbs of the Bible is that God will always
preserve all the species He has created!
Even if this expression brings the misunderstanding of species
invariance to God, it also exposes the "species restriction mechanism"
that the state of life is an "objective and basic fact". Although John
Ray has observed a lot of "degradation" of plants over a long period
of time (e.g. wheat to ryegrass, corn to another weed, etc.). And
fossils show the bewilderment of extinction; However, the change of
species traits produced by "degradation" and species extinction
shown by fossils are not inconsistent with the "species restriction
mechanism". Because the end expression of the "specific restrictionmechanism" is death and extinction; The "degradation" of wheat and
corn is the quasi-fossil expression of species extinction observable in
the short term, and the immediate expression of the quasi-fossil
extinction of life phenomena that can only be revealed in the long
term. According to Richard Leondin, a population geneticist who has
long observed that variation does not solve the problem of survival
given by the environment, it is life itself that creates the environment
for life on Earth today. Therefore, the "specific restriction mechanism"
is the most important mechanism to inhibit variation formed by the
long-term evolution of life for billions of years. Although many people
use the hybrid mule produced by the cross between the male donkey
and the female horse to deny the objective existence of the
"speciality control mechanism", in fact, no amount of sterile hybrids
and new species can form a "hybrid" or "new" independent species.
Because the "species restriction mechanism" has eliminated the
existence of mule breeds in another form, "sterility" (extinction), it
ensures the purity and eternity of donkey and horse breeds. It can be
seen that the self-reproduction of life under the restriction of
speciation is the most important law for the formation of species.
"The restriction mechanism of speciation" always uses "sterility" to
extermination those aberrations that violate all these characteristics
and the production of species across the species.
3. Let us again discuss the "specific restriction mechanism" in
terms of the diversity of life species.
On the surface, biodiversity is determined by biological
characteristics (characteristics), so since ancient times, Aristotle's
classification of species has been marked by the characteristics of
organisms. In fact, this trait is a sign of specialism; The whole point of
specific conditioning is to maintain the infinite continuation of such
specific characteristics. The long-term existence and continuation of
countless individuals with species characteristics constitute the
diversity of life species. Without the "species restriction mechanism",
the stability of this unique feature of species individuals cannot be
guaranteed, and there will be no diversity of life and species! Similarly,
the diversity of individual organisms is completely based on the
long-term stability of species, that is, on the basis of the "species
restriction mechanism", and through the process of species
restriction, God (nature) completes the mission of maintaining all thespecies it has created, protecting the existence and evolution of
species, and even eternity! Therefore, the core of "whole life science"
is the whole life science of "species restriction mechanism". This
mechanism is most prominent in the process of protein formation and
quality inspection.
Let's take a concrete look at the Israeli scientists Hershko and
Ciechanover, who won the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 2004, and the
American scientists Owen. Ross discovered "ubiquitin-regulated
protein degradation," the "kiss of death." Although this explains the
metabolic "death" mechanism of proteins in cells from the chemical
theory, the deep significance and mechanism lies in revealing the
"specific restriction mechanism" of living organisms in cells from the
protein level. It proves that there are all-weather species prevalent in
the microecological environment of any living individual
Sexual restriction mechanism "! Studies on the "kiss of death"
have shown that 30% of the proteins synthesized by information DNA
are not qualified, that is, they do not meet the needs of species.
Therefore, these unqualified proteins must be labeled "ubiquitin" and
sent to the "garbage treatment plant" in the cell to be degraded - this
is the self-elimination of the neutrino level in the cell, and it is the
self-improvement restriction process of the "specific restriction
mechanism" of life in the cell. The aim is to eliminate the cellular raw
material proteins that go beyond speciation in the cell, that is, those
unqualified cellular raw materials that may endanger speciation
independence and speciation continuation, prevent the mutation of
the proteins used to construct the cell, and detect them, label them
as "ubiquitin" for destruction. This process has a tight organization, is
a very clever and complex self-organizing specific restriction behavior
- there are three enzymes in the cell E1, E2, E3, each of which has its
own unique division of labor: E1 activates ubiquitin molecules, E2
binds ubiquitin molecules to proteins that need to be degraded, and
E3 identifies the function of a given protein and selects the protein
that needs to be degraded. When E1 activates ubiquitin, ubiquitin
molecules are sent to E2, which binds ubiquitin molecules to the
specified protein to be degraded according to the E3-resolved
instructions; In this way, the synthesis of new proteins is repeatedly
checked, and when the number of designated proteins bound toubiquitin molecules reaches a certain level, they are sent to a
structure in the cell called a proteasome - a "waste treatment plant".
The treatment plant decides to accept and degrade these poor quality
proteins based on the ubiquitin subtags attached to the specified
proteins. The proteasome is a barrel-like structure that typically
contains 30,000 proteasomes in a human cell, and by processing it,
the protein is cut into short chains of seven to nine amino acids. This
complex process is completely the self-organization regulation
process of the specific restriction mechanism in the inner layer of the
cell, which ensures the quality of protein synthesis, thus ensuring the
normal growth and development of the cell under the specific
restriction and self-reproduction.
4. This "kiss of death" is more common at the cellular level. Take
the human body as an example, there are hundreds of billions of cells
in the human body, there are 274 different kinds of division of labor,
each has a self-recognition function according to the self-organizing
division of labor, and constantly self-regulating renewal mechanism,
and produce new cells to replace damaged and aging cells. Different
tissues of human body regulate apoptosis according to their own time
genes, forming their own death cycle. Scientists have found that
different tissues and organs have different cycles of apoptosis: small
intestine 3 days, liver 1 week, bone 2 months, skin 15-30 days to
complete a renewal, nails 3-4 months, hair growth into several
stages,5. In fact, Mendel's theory of heredity has revealed the ins and
out of the mechanism of "specific restriction mechanism". See
Mendel's diagram of genetic factors:
The figure below is characterized by Mendel's ten years of
experimental research with pure (pea) seed lines, which simply can be
divided into A single character of the seed changes in the
reproductive process of 5-6 generations. As a rule it should be
suitable for the experiments of animal-plant hybridization in units of
all traits of the whole species, and for the natural reproduction of all
life. That is, no matter how many generations the AA produced by the
combination of aa and Aa can only produce AA, aa, Aa; It cannot
produce individual species other than AA, aa, Aa. That is to say,
Mendel's law of "character" separation and law of free combination
are based on AA, and aaThe discovery and naming of species began with Aristotle, mainly
to describe the characteristics that distinguish the species from other
species. The method of characterizing species continued until 1735,
when Carolus. Linnaeus's Systema Naturae invented the method of
binomial nominalism, in which the description of species and the
name and characteristics of the species are represented by both the
genus and the species name. This is a relatively constant expression of
species-conditioned species. This stability and permanence is
precisely the integration of the phylogenetic control mechanism
system from the protein "kiss of death" to the number of
chromosomes (strips), from the number of chromosomes (strips) to
the "cell from cell" (O mnis ceIiuIa e ceIiuIa Rudolph). Virchow's
famous words); From the cell to the self-reproduction of living
individuals to the whole of the species - this series of species
restriction mechanisms are interlinked, which is a continuous and
continuous identical life mechanism from nano-level living particles to
massive living individuals, and this mechanism is always accompanied
by the growth and development of living, living organic whole with
the same species characteristics.
Darwin's On the Origin of Species revealed that the similarity of
organisms in a species is related to the common genetic traits of the
species, which are precisely the product of the integration of specific
constraints. This is the earliest discussion of the "specific restriction
mechanism" from the perspective of the origin of life. Coincidentally,
at the same time, Mendel used biostatistical methods to find that
sexual reproduction inheritance can be quantified, and concluded
that such specific traits do not mix with the corresponding traits
obtained from another parent, and that the offspring of individuals of
any species are complexes inherited from their ancestors, rather than
mixtures or admixtures of different species. This is the authoritative
expression of the same law of "species restriction mechanism" from
the two levels of life making and life quantification.
In 1900, three botanists, de Vries, Collins, and Chushmak,
independently and simultaneously discovered, and from early
genetics answered, the mechanism by which the common
transmission from parent to offspring remains unchanged (the DNAtheory of genes recognized in modern life sciences) - in fact, The
essence of Mendel's understanding is that he quantified the "specific
restriction mechanism" of individual reproduction. It is an in-depth
exploration of the vital statistics expression language of the individual
self-reproduction "cell from cell to cell" species invariance!
So how do you explain the "phylogenetic control mechanism"
and the theory of evolution that all organisms are descended from a
common ancestor? The common ancestor should not only be a
specific species from a species, the common ancestor can be
understood from the level of genes. And because natural selection is
always responsible for changes that occur by chance, species changes
are rare mutations that occur by chance. Mutation was first proposed
by Dutch biologist de Vries in 1900. However, it has long been known
that even in the offspring of complete purebred breeding, only a very
small number of individuals have subtle "jump" changes. Such
changes are not large, but small changes under the control of
"specific restriction mechanism". More importantly, it is its
discontinuity. In Schrodinger's words, "mutations do not appear in
intermediate forms", which does not affect the stability of specific sex.
Therefore, under natural circumstances, there is no intermediate
variety that can produce significant specific changes, and it does not
affect the isotropic evolution of life at the genetic level. History has
proved that species changes are often accidental and sudden events,
species always mutate to produce a new species on a large scale, or
suddenly occur mass extinction of species, which is evidenced by the
Cambrian explosion and the mass extinction of dinosaurs. This means
that the emergence or extinction of species is entirely accidental, and
the evolution of life is not
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 105
The slow linear trajectory, instead of a "jump" evolutionary
trajectory with intermittent spirals (alternating between positive and
negative spiral singularities), is the result of the long-term action of
the "species constraint mechanism." So the lack of intermediate
species in the fossil geological record, or the non-existence of
intermediate species, has long puzzled Darwin. So what explains the
historical lack of intermediate species in the fossil geological record?This can only be explained by quantum theory, as Schrodinger
elucidates - the fact that there is no intermediate energy between
two adjacent energy levels - to understand the quantum theory of life,
where mutations are actually caused by "quantum transitions" in
genetic molecules. The quantum in the gene molecule does not
change substantially before and after the transition, so there is no
intermediate form of species between no change and little change.
The jumping transmission of speciation is a kind of natural and
objective reality that contains the "quantum transition" of genes, and
only in this way can the stability of speciation be guaranteed.
Therefore, the individual life of the species shows that it is always the
individual body of animals and plants (microorganisms) from birth to
death, and then from birth to death... To change from one state to
another; In Schrodinger's words, "A state is a definite configuration of
all the particles in a system." Applying it to the quantum mechanics of
life, this discontinuity of any kind of individual life conforms to the
physical law that "the transformation of one configuration into
another is a quantum transition"; It is the infinite cycle of quantum
transitions of living individuals from one configuration to another that
gives rise to the "species conditioning mechanism" that can forever
span the long-term stability of countless individuals in the process of
life's "jump" change. Therefore, the state and configuration of living
systems have always been discontinuous, jumping, stable and
unchanged, which is also the most clever difficulty of the "species
restriction mechanism" in line with quantum mechanics, and the fact
that genes must be transmitted in code and obey the mathematics of
life. It is clear that de Vries' mutation, Mendel's theory of heredity,
and Darwin's theory of evolution also get to the heart of the law of
"species-dependent mechanisms."
6. Darwin did not solve the specific time and place of human
evolution at all, let alone many specific problems and difficulties such
as the racial composition of the first humans. For example, the
mechanism of speciation often causes a rare mutant to be completely
"drowned" in the population created by mating with a normal
individual, as Darwin had recognized at the time. Because populations
of organisms exert pressure on the resources available at all times and
everywhere, from ancient times to the present day, this is the
objective basis of Malthus's struggle for existence and Darwin'ssurvival of the fittest. Although some scientists still have different
understandings of Malthus's Theory of Population, they even describe
the cruelty of the struggle for survival as an evil theory. In fact,
however, the brutality of the struggle for survival still ensnared
humanity. At 7:58:49 on December 26, 2004, the island of Aceh,
Sumatra Province, Indonesia, was suddenly shaken violently, and an
unprecedented tsunami occurred in an instant. The tsunami swept
across the countries bordering the Indian Ocean, killing more than
200,000 people in a flash. Hundreds of thousands of people have
been displaced, and the economic damage is in the hundreds of
billions of dollars. Three months later, on March 28, 2005, a strong
earthquake occurred in the area again, although scientists predicted
that there would be a big tsunami, but it did not happen, so the loss is
small, it can be seen that the behavior of nature does not care about
human will, not according to human will; The occurrence or
non-occurrence of large tsunamis is completely not decided by
human beings themselves, and we human beings cannot change the
laws of nature's struggle for survival. So at this point in the struggle
for survival, the whole
However, the great life field of the world is a real objective
existence, which restricts the survival of microorganisms, plants,
animals, and human beings, and human beings continue to increase
their ability to resist disasters, but can not change the objective law of
the struggle for survival. In fact, the struggle for survival is also the
objective basis for the existence of the species restriction mechanism.
Because food and sex are the instinctive needs and objective basis for
the existence and reproduction of living things, speciality is to ensure
the continuation of this instinct (group feeding); Without food, no life
(thing) can survive, without sex, life (thing) can not reproduce itself. If
we cannot survive and reproduce, we cannot speak of species, let
alone survival and reproduction, and the stability and permanence of
species and species. Food and sex, both of which are indispensable to
any life; Without one, there would be no species or species group,
and no life would exist. This is why the text of the Law of Integral
Plate Heredity is: The cause of death and extinction! In fact, with the
height of scientific development today, the rational core of Malthus's
theory of the struggle for survival is precisely the law of life expressedby the restriction mechanism of species (food and sex) in the
language of the struggle for survival, and the law of the restriction of
food and sex (species) on species, which is the most undisputable fact.
In essence, food and sex are species, because the different
characteristics of species are completely derived from the habit of
different food and different reproductive modes of life species; The
duality of the eating instinct and the sexual instinct is the instinct of
the life (individual body) of the species, which is best illustrated by
the formation and classification of herbivores and carnivores, and is
even more proved by the reality that man (human) is distinguished
from all other animal characteristics by his cooked food. In the Theory
of Population, Malthus used the powerful mathematical language to
reveal the irreconcilable contradiction between food (resources) and
sex (number of reproduction), and demonstrated that the population
grows by the NTH power of geometric progression 2, and its growth
trend will be 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64 every 25 years. The sequence of
rapid growth (mathematical growth of sexual instinct, cell division).
Food (food) resources according to the arithmetic series 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,
7, 8...... Growth, its growth is very slow, the two are not coordinated,
the formation of irreconcilable contradiction. Malthus calculated,
with the precision of this multiplication table, that the ratio of
population to food reached 256/9 in 200 years; In 300 years it will be
as high as 409/13... This contradiction over time, the prospect is not
optimistic. In fact, Malthus used the contradiction between food
(food) and sex (reproduction) instinct to interpret the fierce and
terrible survival struggle between living individuals and species,
interspecies and populations for resources in the mutual restriction,
which is the origin of Darwin's natural selection mechanism. It can be
seen that Darwin's natural selection is a natural selection of sexual
(food and sex instinct) restriction mechanism, if life does not need
food and sex, the struggle for food and sex resources will no longer
exist, and there will be no survival struggle.
7. We have discussed the evolution and accumulation of feeding
genes in the Law of Integral Plate Heredity, arguing that an organism
(for example, man) "acquires order" through "eating genes". As
Schrodinger pointed out, "the astonishing talent of an organism to
concentrate on itself a 'sequential stream beam', thereby avoiding a
decline into atomic chaos, and thus' absorbing order 'in a suitableenvironment, seems to be related to the existence of chromosomal
molecules by means of' non-periodic solids'." ... "As far as the higher
animals are concerned, it has long been known to man that they are
born entirely by order of absorption. For in the organisms of varying
complexity which they feed on, the state of matter is extremely
ordered. After the animals use this food, they excrete much degraded
stuff. However, it is not completely degraded, because plants can still
use it (of course, in the case of plants,
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 107
Sunlight is the most powerful supplier of negative entropy.
8. The historical record of human farming can be pushed back to
10,000 to 20,000 years ago, and the time without written records will
be billions of years or more ago. 5,000 to 8,000 years ago, there were
permanent human "growers" in the village, wheat cultivation can be
traced back to India and China 15,000 years ago. In two caves and a
lake in Jiangxi Province, China, McNish and Peking University found
pollen and plant fossils of wild rice that first appeared between
18,000 and 17,000 years ago, strongly demonstrating that rice
cultivation had begun in China's Yangtze River basin at that time. The
agricultural revolution, which took the opportunity of the wheat
revolution and the rice revolution, completed the lasting unity of
human food and seed. An analysis of collagen in the skulls of 10
different human skeletons shows that different ratios of carbon and
nitrogen isotopes in the foods people ate led to different food (sexual)
compositions in their body tissues. Rice varieties and chemical
components have deeply marked the food mark on people's skulls,
and it is directly added to all (food) organisms from the living
environment, constituting the harmony of species and genes of
organisms; The diversity of food varieties of the agricultural
revolution enriched the reasonable high grade (cooked food)
composition of organic matter in the (human) organism, which has
been stamped in the long-term evolution of man's unique diet (skull
bones), which is a fossil collection of complementary species and
diets. So Western scholars believe that rice cultivation supported
China's highly developed civilization 5000 years ago! The subsequent
corn revolution brought nightshade plants, potatoes, tomatoes, beansand so on... The emergence and development of cultivated
plantations have stabilized human food types and specialities for tens
of thousands of years. The map of the human genome today is linked
to this dietary stability because "the states of matter in organisms of
varying complexity as food are extremely ordered." The history of
food and food has greatly enriched the species, and enriched the
language of the species restriction mechanism!
9, the famous French biologist Buffon first proposed the three
factors of biological evolution, the basis of the principle and the most
important reason is food - the change of food, the change of food is
the change of food. In essence, the cause of climate change is implicit
in food, and the cause of service is an artificial choice. Why is climate
change implied by changes in food? Because human zang-fu
movement (microcirculation) has a harmonious seasonality with
Qi-hou, in the long-term evolution, the seasonal changes of guan-qi
and climate in the soft closed system of each zang-fu are
communicated with each other in the synchronous Qi-hou, and the
formed microecology changes harmoniously with the climate seasons,
and forms the habit of catering to the seasonal changes. Therefore,
the human body must absorb seasonal food to adapt to this change,
especially the use of seasonal vegetables to absorb the subtle
atmosphere of the world that the plant itself absorbs with the season.
We can also deeply feel this need of the viscera from the human
appetite, "greed" is a reflection of the human brain's need for
seasonal food, and the viscera in the body will make "greed" at any
time through an implicit reflection.10, specifically, food genes into the
human body is the most ordered, food genes are the most ordered
complex components of the opal, any organism (animal remains,
plant roots, leaves, flowers, fruits) contained in the gene sequence is
not destroyed. We all know that the simplest experimental method to
extract onion DNA strands is to chop a large onion into a China dish,
then take 10 tablespoons of washing liquid, add 1 teaspoon of salt
and 4 liters of water, stir and take this mixture of liquid, put it in a
water-proof boiler and simmer for 3 minutes, stir constantly and
homogenize at high speed for 5 minutes. After a few drops of fresh
pineapple juice and a few drops of alcohol, wait a moment, the
interface of the two layers can see the flocculent appear. At this point,
we just use a stirring stick to pick up the flocculent, and when it picksout of the glass, it immediately collapses into a network of fibers --
this is the onion DNA! Let's compare this experiment to the way you
eat Onions (anything else) : chop them up and cook them, chew them
in your mouth, add enzymes (digestive juices), stir them into your
stomach (stomach wriggles) to create a sea of heat, and add stomach
acid and methane gas, the equivalent of pineapple juice and alcohol.
If you pick out the stomach, it immediately collapses into a network of
fibers, also the DNA of an onion (or a food). That is to say, people eat
DNA from different organisms every day - "eating genes", "absorbing
sequences" to build their own DNA structure. And eating is not just a
"sequence" of eating genes! Each kind of food (sex) carries the
attributes of regional soil and water, which enriches the human body
"the number of heaven and earth" (one side of soil and water
nourishes one side of people), and constitutes the species of people.
Because the land is the source of all life, all the remains of organisms
(animal remains, plant roots, stems, leaves, flowers and fruits) are the
essence of this source, which gathers the essence of all (food) things
to form human eating habits; Habits become nature, nature is an
evolutionary force, and all these and the genetic "order" are
assimilated by eating, drinking, and breathing - so that the long-term
accumulation forms the feeding instinct, forming the characteristics of
the species. Any organism has its own characteristics of food (food),
which form the characteristics of the whole relatively the same (state
configuration) agglomeration in the process of life evolution, which
forms a species. So Darwin saw in the Galapagos that the birds varied
from one island to another, a change in the "amount of heaven and
earth" by which food absorbed the soil and water of the area. In fact,
the formation of species can never be separated from the habit of
dietary absorption, the long-term evolutionary inertia of "absorbing
order"; Any change in feeding habits can change the "sequence
stream" of the organism's "internal environment" to varying degrees.
During the reign of Kangxi, a minister suffered from severe diarrhea,
and the imperial doctor prescribed many prescriptions that could not
be treated. One day the Kangxi emperor told the minister to eat some
roe deer meat can be cured; The minister was doubtful and ate once
according to the emperor's will, and the diarrhea was magically cured.
This case deeply reflects the vital importance of food to the
organism's "absorbing order"! Feeding habits are seed-formingBasic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 109
A power (habit is power), which, with the order of absorption,
gives permanent stability to the seed, is formed
The restriction mechanism of species is introduced. Because the
struggle for survival stems from the competition for resources (food
and sex),
11, the struggle for survival is another form of expression of the
type of restriction mechanism. Moreover, natural selection is in the
objective existence of survival struggle, different varieties have
different adaptability to survival struggle, natural selection of the
fittest survival; It is also the expression of death of the unfit - nature
selects all varieties by the same law, and the ultimate expression
chosen by the unfit is undoubtedly death and extinction. Any species
can only die and go extinct if it cannot satisfy its food and sexual
instincts. So "the only alternative to breaking the genetic law of the
whole plate is the death of the individual and the extinction of the
species." This makes the unified species formed under the speciation
restriction mechanism in a permanent stable dynamic "jump"
evolution process. This can also be fully demonstrated from the life
spiral trajectory! According to the life helix principle, population
growth is either positive or negative. Evolutionary history proves that
in addition to the wars, plagues, natural disasters that occurred during
the struggle for survival... The resulting depopulation, such as the
Black Death that killed half of Europe's population in the 14th century,
did not affect the positive trajectory of the overall movement of life.
From 200,000 years ago to the present day in the 21st century,
population has always increased in a positive spiral, always
accompanied by a population explosion. According to documents, the
cultural revolution 200,000 years ago caused the population to
suddenly increase to 1 million, which was the first population
explosion on record. The agricultural revolution brought about a
second population explosion, from 5 million to 50 million. With the
Industrial Revolution, the population exploded in a short time,
reaching as much as 6 billion! This not only proves the objective
existence of the Malthusian population principle and the struggle for
survival, but also shows that population growth always evolvesaccording to the spiral of life. The Industrial revolution led to the
over-population growth and the over-population explosion; On the
surface, human beings have completed the conquest of life, but the
potential crisis of environmental destruction and new plague disasters
have quickly appeared, resulting in a new struggle for survival of this
industrial (chemical) revolution, and the struggle for new survival
does not make human optimism. In fact, human beings' own wars
continue to devour human life, as in today's Middle East, Iraq...
12. From the perspective of the life spiral trajectory, the reason
why the life movement trajectory of all living individuals, species and
populations can be measured by the life spiral trajectory is that
nature chooses all species and individuals everywhere at all times, so
that the most adapted species and individuals can survive. Therefore,
these populations of life, which have been strictly selected and
conform to the mathematical laws of life, leave the most descendants
of the most adapted species and individuals, but they are still
discontinuous. This is represented as a positive spiral trajectory. The
following figure: This trajectory coincidences with the 2 NTH power
geometric series of Malthusian mathematical growth of life; This
coincidence also appears in the cell growth process of cell division,
which is consistent with the 0.618 of Hua Luogeng's optimal selection
method, especially the amount of life reproduction is often connected
with the logarithmic helix property. This is why Mendel, in his ten
years of pea experiments, always found that 3:1 of the mathematics
of life restricts the deep mathematical and unique solution of the
genetic phenomenon of life - which conceals the mathematical
language of the species restriction mechanism and the spiral track of
life.
But is mutation a challenge to the mechanism of specific
regulation? Let's talk about it in terms of two emotions: A. Lethal
mutations.
B, non-lethal mutation.
As for A, it is the expression of species extinction, the direct
effect of species restriction mechanism, the inevitable result of the
death of the unfit person and the natural elimination.
For B, such non-lethal mutations (mutations) are always
accompanied by the root of genetic change, and conform to the lawof gene distribution and recombination revealed by Mendel. This
restricts the probability of the mutant to form a new species. To form
a new species, the mutation can be inherited only if the designated
position of the gene on the chromosome is changed or the
chromosome is changed. Only if this change is fixed for a long time to
form self-reproduction, which requires a fixed pattern of genes and
chromosomal aberrations with their own newly designated locations,
forming an effective genetic mechanism, can new species be talked
about, and this probability is almost non-existent. In 1903 Morgan's
student Walter Sadon discovered through the fruit fly that there was
a correlation between the inheritance of a certain genetic trait and
some detail in its chromosomes-that genes might be organized in
sequences along a single line on the chromosome. This was proved in
breeding experiments in 1911. The controlled feature can be
positioned on the banded melanogaster chromosome. Figure:
Muller's pioneering contribution at that time was particularly great,
which was the basis and source of discovering the linear arrangement
of genes. However, from the mathematical unity of the linear
arrangement of points and feature related arrangements in the figure,
it expressed the corresponding harmonious relationship between the
specific characteristics and the calibration position of chromosomes.
That is, the permanent mathematical unity of species characteristics
and gene calibration on chromosomes are closely related, and this
unity forms the restriction mechanism of speciation and restricts
mutation. Muller (1890-1967) discovered in 1926 that X-rays could
induce mutations. In repeated experiments with fruit flies, Muller
realized that the frequency of mutation in flies under natural
conditions is very small, almost zero. Muller concluded: "X-rays can
cause both genetic mutations and chromosomal aberrations; Most of
the visible sudden changes induced by X-ray are recessive mutations,
but there are a few dominant mutations. Whether it is a dominant
mutation or an implicit mutation, there is often a lethal effect."
Death and extinction is another language of "specific
constraints." In fact, many points of living organisms are
mutation-free (including mutations). Such as ABO blood type. Since
the discovery of ABO blood group in 1900, scientists have not found
or seen any variation (mutation) at this point in humans, and the
frequency of variation (mutation) at this point is very small, almostzero. ABO blood group in the long process of evolution, it is extremely
difficult to occur even a very small mutation. It can be seen that in the
long age of natural selection, the specific restriction mechanism
always works quietly at different levels and different points (such as
chromosome or gene calibration position), and absolutely implement
mutation free (sex) at the point where the specific sex is irreconcilable,
so as to ensure the normal reproduction and continuation of the
species, and ensure the stability and eternity of the species!
13, The origin of life The age of DNA of life in the fossil record of
bacteria began long ago from bacteria. Susan Aldridge, a British
scientist, stressed in the "Thread of Life - Genes and Genetic
Engineering" : "In fact, the transmission of genes is nothing special, it
has been around for billions of years. Its application potential comes
from human control over it, not from evolutionary blindness." This
conclusion is based on bacteria from the historical fossil record.
Around 3.6 billion years ago, life began to be dominated by bacterial
patterns. Major part of bacterial genome
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 111
Without exception is the arrangement of nucleotides. In other
words, bacteria (single-cell, eukaryotic cells), plants, and animals
share (use) genes, and have a long-term symbiosis and co-evolution
for billions of years. For example, without intestinal colonies, the
human (animal) body can not digest and absorb food nutrients.
Without colonies in the gut, it takes 50 to 100 years for a meal to be
completely digested. Recently, Chinese anthropologists discovered
some 400 skulls that were excavated in Shandong Province in June
2001, all of which were human remains dating back to 5,200 years
ago. From the holes in the skulls, they concluded that skull surgery
had been performed in China more than 5,000 years ago. So it is
inconceivable that people more than 5,000 years ago had no colonies
in their guts. As Sagan and Margolis emphasize, "all the elements
essential to life on Earth - oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon -
were restored to availability thanks to the involvement of microbes...
The whole ecology depends on the decomposing function of
microorganisms and fungi to return the chemical nutrients contained
in dead plants and animals back into the whole biological system."That is to say: the life and death of plants, people and animals are
completely dependent on symbiosis with bacteria - from this
understanding, to trace the history of life DNA, it is necessary to put
the upper limit of life time to at least 3.6 billion years ago, and
microorganisms also have species constraints. Recent studies have
shown that DNA has changed little or not much since ancient times.
From Mendel's law of inheritance, we have found the mathematical
(3:1) fact that genes determine the inheritance of life by looking at
the relationship between descendants (offspring and countless
offspring). Since the DNA pattern has basically not changed since 3.6
billion years ago and shares the same genetic code, these constitute
the basis for the long-term stable existence of life from proteins to
cells - tissues, individuals, populations, species food and sex, which is
the proof and historical origin of the long-term existence of species
restriction mechanisms. In addition, the number of chromosomes
also constitutes a crucial link in the mechanism of specific restriction.
We talked earlier about mules being strong, but not fertile, and
infertility prevents mules from forming independent species.
Scientists have found that the main reason is that the male horse has
64 chromosome strips, the female donkey has 62 chromosome strips,
and the mule produced by hybridization has 63 chromosome strips,
and the genes carried by different numbers of chromosome strips are
fundamentally different, which is the expression language of the
genetic restriction mechanism from the gene to the chromosome
level. There is no alternative to the extinction of (hybrid) species in
order to safeguard the long-term existence and permanence of the
species. 14. Therefore, even if hybridization became possible in
history, the outcome was also sterility and extinction, so as to ensure
the purity of the species. According to the newly declassified Russian
case records: March 1, 1929 - March 20, 1932 had secretly carried out
a human-ape hybridization plan, implemented by Ivanov. He went to
Africa to find African women to interbreed with apes, with the
consent of local leaders. However, it died because African women
refused to mate with apes (chimpanzees). Because Ivanov insulted
the "mission", he was put into prison after returning to Russia, and
died less than a year after being released from prison. So Ivanov
didn't make an ape hybrid. In addition, there is a written record of
Professor Voronov's article "Transplanting Sex cells from Apes toHumans" and building the "Ape Castle". At the Grimaldi Animal
Breeding Center, 100 animals are kept for human-ape hybridization
experiments. The legend produced a "monster" similar to the "snow
man", 2 meters tall and infinite force. However, the key is still sterility
and extinction! In 1927, the Belarusian newspaper Rossiya Gazeta
published the story, which was a sensation. Although reports vary, it is
difficult to find out whether the Russians have produced human-ape
hybrids through human-ape interbreeding throughout history
It turns out that even with human-ape hybrids, sterility leading
to extinction is a sure fact. At the same time, scientists in various
countries
are
also
conducting
interspecific
(xenogeneic)
transplantation. In the early xenotransplantation from a chimpanzee
kidney to a human, one kidney survived for only nine months.
Transgenic technology was started in the 1980s by scientists John
Walwalck and David Walwalck. White used a pig heart transplant and
found that within minutes of blood circulation passing through the
pig's heart, it was disrupted by a mechanism called hyperacute
rejection. The experiment further found that: "This rejection
mechanism is that antibodies of the human immune system activate a
group of proteins that can form a complement system, which
together react to foreign organs.Launching a ferocious attack, they
punch holes in it, mobilize blood coagulants to cut off its blood supply
and turn it into a black mass of tissue." ... This history of human-ape
hybridization and xenotransplantation has provided us with a
"blueprint" for the "hypothetical experiment" of "human-animal
hybrid life production" in the 21st century. From the chromosome
outside the protein, the human has 46 chromosome strips, the ape
has 48 chromosome strips, even if the ape hybrid is possible, the
resulting hybrid can only be a "hybrid" with 47 chromosome strips.
According to the actual existence of mules, it is certain that the
"hybrid" of human-ape hybrids will be produced, sterile and extinct.
Thus, the mechanism of specific restriction will always eliminate by
means of death and extinction (hybrid sterility) all interspecific
aberrations of any living individual that deviate from this variety. This
is the most typical real historical case of the mechanism of species
restriction.
14, March 20, 2005 Purdue University pathologist Boluit et alhave found that the genes of plants have a self-correcting mechanism.
It can correct the wrong variation of the offspring with the genetic
restriction mechanism inherited by the grandfather or
great-grandfather. Boluitt found that it was sometimes possible to
select healthy genetic material from the gene pool of
great-grandparents and modify defective mutated genes inherited
directly from their parents. It can be seen that the correction of
defective genes is a variety of sexual instincts inherent in species, and
a function of the genetic restriction mechanism to self-correct by
using intergenerational inheritance. It can effectively change the
errors that deviate from the genetic defects of distant ancestors in the
genetic process, and can retroactively maintain the normal genes of
great-grandparents in order to regulate genes at any time. Change the
genetic process mistakes and mutations made by the parents. This
self-correcting mechanism, in which errors contrary to normal
speciality are corrected by passing through generations, is a (repeated)
manifestation of speciality restriction. In the Law of Global Plate
Heredity, we regard intergenerational heredity as the pattern of
intergenerational heredity of global plate heredity, which is the
expression process in which ancient intergenerational genes
reproduce and transcribe the complete gene fragment corresponding
to the original species trait through the regulation of temporal genes.
This expression itself is to periodically regulate the genetic evolution
of progeny genes with the genes of the original ancestors, and it is a
process of species restriction through time (gene) cycle movement to
regulate pure species. Purdue University pathologist Boluit et al. have
discovered that plant genes have a self-correcting mechanism, which
completely shows that spaced inheritance includes the mechanism of
intergenerational inheritance, which lies in the fact that life has a
mechanism of periodic self-correcting gene defects and errors at any
time to ensure that the specific restriction mechanism is inherited in
the interspaced generations. The secret of changing the genomic
profile of traits that deviate from speciality. This also fully proves the
existence of interval inheritance, which is conducive to the specific
restriction mechanism to periodically check and correct the life gene
sequence, and effectively ensure the purity of the offspring's specific
nature.
15, the self-correction mechanism of periodic interval heredity(including intergenerational heredity) can also be based on
repeatability
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 113
Because of the "palindrome" structure has been deeply
understood. Half of the 59 million bases of the Y chromosome were
disordered and contained almost no functional genes. Only recently
have scientists realized that the Y chromosome contains a large
number of duplicate genes, which are arranged in a "palindromic"
structure and have the effect of modifying genetic mutations. Most of
them are located in eight "palindromic" structures that contain 3
million bases and contain most of the genes that control testicular
fertility and function. Scientists have found that it is these
"palindromic" structures that make up for the lack of pairing
"partners" on the Y chromosome, and "palindromic" is also a
structural feature that makes up for the loneliness of the Y
chromosome. The "palindrome" structure can repair mutated genes
through internal gene exchange. Scientists determined that at least
six "palindromic" structures existed before human evolution, and
appeared as early as more than 5 million years ago, and pointed out
that the gene exchange at both ends of the "palindromic" structure is
an important reason and mechanism to ensure the stability of Y
chromosome genes.
Palindrome is a kind of life mathematical repetition language. As
a symbol of human language, it first appeared in ancient Greece. At
the end of the 18th century, French officer Broussard found a black
basalt SLATE in the ruins of the lower Nile River in Egypt, that is, the
famous black Rosetta stone, which is engraved with mysterious
pictures and pictures, and there is the application of "palindrome". It
is one of the most mysterious secret languages in early human
cryptography. Ciphers were first developed and used in the first
century BC, and Julius Caesar is said to have used a very simple
substitution cipher in which each letter is replaced by the third letter
after it, the Caesar cipher (Athbash). Repetition is a means and
method of encryption. Repetition In cryptographic text, the number
of cryptographic (text) letters from one case to another is multiple of
the key letters. If the digits of the password are often repeated, thelength of the key word can be calculated from the double analysis,
and the number of password letters used in the calculation, and the
plaintext letters can be deciphered by frequency analysis.
"Palindrome" is just a mathematical transformation of the code letter
repetition, the earliest "Turing" computer used the Hodges
"palindrome" test language, so that the computer can compare the
first symbol with the last symbol, the second symbol with the
penultimate symbol, and so on, so that the essence of the palindrome
is still repeated regularly at different frequencies. Seen from the spiral
pattern of the texture of the cold shirt strip of the ancient forest, it is
actually a kind of repetition, and the essence of it and the basic unit
of life, "cell from cell" is three-dimensional repetition, and the smaller
unit of protein and amino acid is also a spiral structure. Like the
"alpha spiral" - in the 1930s, Linus of the California Institute of
Technology. Pauling proposed that the "alpha helix" is a key feature of
amino acid structure. Pauling believed that a replica of itself was
connected to an asymmetric figure, forming a spiral with the same
Angle from head to toe. The helix is the simplest structure in which
amino acids can self-organize. Now it has been understood that the
smallest unit of chromosomes is the nucleosome, which consists of
four histone proteins H2a, H2b, r13, H1 two molecules each, a total of
eight molecules formed a diameter of 10 nanometers of the ball, DNA
around the ball 13/4 times. There is also histone H1 present on the
DNA strand near the bead, which is the structure of the nucleosome.
Many nucleosomes are strung together to form a chromosome
filament with DNA as the backbone. The key is that such filaments are
spiralized four times, from a primary structure filament with a
diameter of 10 nanometers to a secondary structure helix with a
diameter of 30 nanometers to a superhelix with a tertiary structure
with a diameter of 400 nanometers. Several spirals were finally visible
under the microscope
The chromosome. Such an infinite number of helical
nucleosomes make up the DNA-chromosomes, which must have
complex life spirals as the life path of the organism. In fact, as far as
the human body (animal) is concerned, from inside to outside, the
physiological structure of each person is widely distributed countless
repeated structures: the left and right eyes, left and right nose (hole),left and right ears, left and right upper limbs, left and right hands, left
and right legs, left and right feet, and left and right lungs, left and
right kidneys, left and right liver in the chest... The human body is
completely in a state of repeated physiological harmony. Some might
say it's symmetric, it's a one-to-one correspondence between left and
right, but essentially the one-to-one correspondence between left
and right is based entirely on relative equality and repetition; The
genetic code is the genetic language of life which is formed by the
natural repetition of life information: three bases determine an amino
acid, and the bases are only A, T, G, C, (U= T= A); A and T, G and C
correspond to and complement each other; They are subject to 3:1
life mathematics, which determines the repeatability of DNA strands,
all of which are unified in the spiral linear repetition, especially the
irregular repeatability in the helix structure of the unity, to construct
the diversity and complexity of life traits; It can be said that the most
important language of life is repetition! The most important track of
life is the positive spiral line, repeated and spiral track is the
harmonious soul of life!
Scientists have discovered discontinuous repeats and intervals in
the code order on DNA. Found "discontinuous structural genes",
"jumping genes", "overlapping genes"... The different rhythms of
repetition constitute the different frequencies of genes, and the
different frequencies of genes and irregular gene repeats constitute
the ever-changing complexity and diversity of the genetic information
of life - and this complexity and ever-changing form the complex
diversity and distinguishable life personality of individual organisms.
At present, the most popular high-tech DNA fingerprinting for human
identification is to use repeated gene segments to carry the body's
own information function, that is, the fact that people's identities are
loaded into their own sets of factors. Use of Souset blotting to
establish an identity based on an individual's DNA. That is, among the
distinctive molecular features of human DNA, exons, exons,
transposons and other small and large fragments, repeat features are
the most prominent. Small pieces of DNA that are identical, usually
about 20 bases long, repeat over and over again; But everyone is
different. University of Leicester scientist Alec Jeffrey was surprised to
find that the length of a person's miniatures varies from person to
person. This mini-satellite spread across the genome has random(repetitive) variability, allowing the mini-satellite pattern of different
people to be displayed and used as a kind of fingerprint for
meaningful identification. This is the application of repetition to the
regularity of DNA-sized fragments. This different level, regular and
irregular repetition is unified in the mathematical repetition of the life
spiral, forming a high degree of unity and numerical stability of the
organism's multilevel and subspecies restriction mechanism. In this
way, we can effectively ensure the stability of all life traits, so that
such complex and ever-changing genes can indeed maintain the
long-term stability and harmony of the species in the growth and
development of the organism and the genetic process, and ensure
that life forms a unified and stable whole in the long-term and
complex movement process!
16, the species restriction mechanism is the only law to ensure
genetic stability, it is a very complex quantum binary mechanism
across time and space. Firstly, the quantum binary mechanism is
characterized by entanglement in accordance with the mathematics
of life and multi-level specific constraints, allowing specific
inheritance and variation under specific constraints. When the genetic
variation exceeds this specific restriction mechanism, the stability and
permanence of the species are achieved through the death of the
individual and the extinction of the species, and its prominent
expression is achieved
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 115
The form is the sterility of the individual - the quantum
mathematical conditioning of life, sterility, death and extinction are
the species of life
Restriction mechanism law; It is the process of universal duality
across time and space, which produces the persistent configuration of
the discontinuous system integration of the individual state of species
and the permanent speciation characteristics of life.
Erwin Schrodinger put forward a very incisable statement about
the "permanence and permanence" of life, he said:
"The fact that the genetic structure seems to contain only a
relatively small number of atoms (on the order of a thousand,
perhaps less) yet it exhibits the most regular, law-abiding activity -and is so persistent and permanent - is a miracle." - What Is Life?
Why? Why do life, species, living individuals, cells, and genes
have such stable "permanence and permanence"?
In fact, the famous physicist Schrodinger has already answered
this question from the laws of physics and the broad related theories
of biology. Schrodinger said: "An organism must have a considerable
structure in order for its internal life and its interaction with the
external world to be described by precise laws." What is the structure?
Structure is the whole, structure is the system, structure is the
integration! Today we know that there are 300 trillion cells in the
human body, each with 23×2 chromosomes in the nucleus; There are
35,000 genes on each chroma, and the number of genes in the
human body is undoubtedly an astronomical huge structure (35,000 ×
300 trillion ×23×2...). And it's even more infinite if you calculate it in
terms of nucleosomes. The genes of the human body are just genetic
factors on the chromosomes of the cell; If the structure of the human
body is understood in terms of atoms (then each gene was calculated
on the order of 1000, now it is three or four orders of 1000), we can
hardly calculate exactly how many atoms the human body is
composed of. Using Schrodinger's yellow light wavelength particle to
intuitively compare the size of the atom, its volume contains billions
of atoms, compared with the yellow light wavelength particle and the
number of atoms in the human body, the number of atoms in the
human body is the same as the earth than the sand grain - infinity is
smaller than infinity, it is impossible to count; Using quantum biology:
"A state is a definite configuration of all the particles in a system." Any
organism from amino acids to proteins is a giant polymeric state (a
definite configuration), "so we come to the conclusion that an
organism and all the biologically related processes it undergoes must
have an extremely large number of 'polyatomic' structures."
Accidents must be prevented: 'single-atom' events play a major role."
So Schrodinger used Goethe's poem to express the virtue of life's
"permanence and permanence" : "Existence is eternal;
For there are laws that protect the treasures of life; And the
universe draws beauty from these treasures." It can be seen that life
hides a huge structure in order to have the laws of genetics, the
genetic code, the law of complementarity... These laws coincide with
the laws of nature, and these laws of life are only the expression of afraction of the laws of a state (a definite configuration) of "whole
biology." The study of life science in the West is more about empirical
science, which often puts aside the whole of life! Holobiology is the
cognition of the existence of the huge structural system of organisms.
Why don't we just cut the earth open and study it? When we partially
divide life into experiments, organisms are already dead, and many
phenomena are dead and static, which is similar to the destruction of
the earth
Annihilate the Earth) for the same reason. So Alfred Wegener, in
his study of land and sea change, suggested that geology could be
studied in the field or in the library; It can be studied from the actual
investigation of one place, or it can be studied from the accumulated
evidence as a whole. Wegener conducted extensive literature
research at a German provincial university and found that the North
and South continents must have once joined together into a
supercontinent, which he named Pangaea. And wrote "The Origin of
Continents and oceans" epoch-making masterpiece; And found
evidence that all these continents were once unified, which provides
us with the best reference and method for studying life as a whole!
China has 5,000 years of tradition and thinking system of holistic life
science, and the West has found many laws and accumulated many
detailed documents through the research of experimental science on
life movement in the past 400 years.
17, molecular biology can not solve the many contradictions
between human disease and health, let alone cure the plagueMaas
concludes in the Historical Lessons of Medicine: "The beginnings of
modern medicine have traditionally been fixed in the mid-1930s,
marked by the entry of sulfonamides and penicillin into the
pharmacopoeia, and revolutionary forces in medical practice are
often attributed to these events." That's what it looked like at the
time. Medicine has been turned upside down, some revolutionized.
Many, many incurable diseases in the past found cures at that time.
There is a cure... Almost overnight, the flowers blossomed; Some of
the most common and deadly human diseases -- lobed pneumonia,
meningitis, typhoid, tuberculosis, various forms of septicemia -- can
be cured instantly with antibiotics." However, the emergence of the
"super virus" 50 years later shattered the myth of modern medicalpride. The British "Daily Telegraph" reported on March 3, 2005, a
group of world-leading scientists predicted that by 2010, all
antibiotics developed by humans will be unable to fight the
"supervirus" - MRSA (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
acronym) has beaten vancomycin. The reflection on science marked
by Carson's Silent Spring and the prediction of Future Disasters have
been proved by the unrestrained ravages of AIDS and other diseases
around the world. Polio, which had been eradicated by 2004, broke
through the immune "sugar pill" and reappeared in parts of Africa.
The "white plague" of tuberculosis has also re-spread on a large scale
in the world, and has become the first major killer of infectious
diseases in China today. In 2004, the South Asian bird flu has not been
completely eliminated, 2005 Marburg hemorrhagic fever to April 17,
it was reported that 255 people infected, 233 people died, the
mortality rate of more than 91%, there is no treatment vaccine and
method... For these sticking points and lessons, Thomas concludes:
"I believe the record to date tends to support that hunch. The
most complex diseases I know of, involving many cells, many tissues,
and many organs, are stage III syphilis, chronic tuberculosis, and
intractable anemia. In each case, at least five major organs and tissues
are involved, and each organ, each tissue seems to be affected by
many environmental factors. Until they were scientifically evaluated,
each was considered to be what we now call a "multifactorial" disease;
They are too complex to allow one to consider any single
pathogenesis."
This is the whole existence of the whole disease and death of the
famous American medical scientist with his lifetime clinical experience
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 117
The description and the summary of experience and lessons. This
is the theoretical opportunity for the birth of holistic biology!
Life is a huge structure, life is a complete system, life is a
wonderful ordered integration of countless "aggregates", life is a
whole! In this regard, Lewis Thomas, a member of the National
Academy of Sciences, issued a sincere cry, he said:
"But I can imagine one of our faults that is still eating away at us:
how little we know about ourselves. We are ignorant about how wefunction, where we occupy, and above all about this vast, incredible
system of life in which we are rooted as working parts. We don't
understand nature, not at all."
The lack of integrity of the "systems biology" born at the end of
the 18th and 20th centuries is still within the framework of cell
biology, mainly the study of cell functional systems. The aim is still to
understand the complete genome or the activity of the optomome,
and then to fully understand the mysteries of life. This is still a willing!
In fact, as far as specific regulation is concerned, it exists and
regulates all levels of life (atoms, bases, amino acids, proteins, genes,
cells, tissues...). Each (biological) energy level, various sizes and
different material scales (angstrom to meter), with a unique
simultaneity to unify the four elements of life (time, space, living
organisms, self-reproduction) in a whole mechanism, forming the law
of the eternal overall state of life.
Let's start with Schrodinger's What Is Life? This book discusses
the theoretical origins of "holistic biology"!
What Is Life? Since 1943, it has been widely disseminated and
far-reaching an epoch-making scientific theory, and history has
regarded it as the beginning of molecular biology, which directly led
to the DNA revolution of gene double spiral, and developed into the
life science of genomics and genetic engineering in half a century.
However, we carefully study What Is Life? It is not difficult to find that
the core of the life science theory discussed by Schrodinger is actually
the source of the "whole life science" theory...
Why Is What Is Life? Is it the origin of the theory of "holistic
biology"? For 2,000 years, only the scientist Schrodinger gave the first
comprehensive definition of life (rather than living things). The most
important characteristic of life is that the living thing is different from
any other material that occupies time and space for a long time.
Schrodinger said, "What are the characteristics of life? When can a
piece of matter be considered alive? The answer is when it continues
to "do something," move, exchange matter with the environment,
etc., and expects it to "hold on" much longer than a piece of
inanimate matter would under similar circumstances. The reason why
life is much longer than any other matter is to "live"! "Living"
organisms are the first of the four elements of life, and the activity of
life is based on information (time element), genetic code,macromolecules-non-cyclic solids (space element) as the model of
genetic material DNA, so it is consistent with the stability and
durability of discontinuous inheritance brought by the quantum
transition of life quantum mechanics. In this process, life is always
"born with negative entropy", and "order" is extracted from the
environment to maintain the organization concept of the system and
form the whole state or configuration that can be inherited. This
answers life from the different levels of the four life elements of time,
space, living organisms and self-reproduction
What life is! To sum up, life is a living state, a living permanent
configuration of the whole. The category of long and short time
determines the durability of life; The micro-size of space (quantum life
factor) determines the basis of life and subdivision movement, while
the state and configuration also have functions, dynamics (entropy),
structure... Many deeper systemic big whole configurations - this is
Schrodinger's "whole life" big science concept!
In the late 50 years of the 19th and 20th centuries, scientists
under the guidance of Schrodinger's quantum life theory, Watson and
Crick achieved a breakthrough in the DNA double helix structure
model,
and
made
outstanding
achievements
in
macromolecules-non-periodic solids, genetic code, and genetic
engineering. Completed from molecular biology to gene informatics,
genomics - proteomics by leaps and bounds, great achievements!
However, no matter how the molecular biology and gene informatics
with genomics as the core is developed, it only serves as an
information base to expand the information capacity, and can not
control the life function and solve the specific disease medical
problems. Because it deviates from the core of Schrodinger's theory
of "living" life as a whole. As Roger Penrose wrote on August 8, 1991,
in What Is Life? As the foreword to the reprint advises and cautions,
"Like many works that have had an influence on the human mind, it
sets forth a series of arguments whose veracity becomes apparent
once mastered; It is disturbing that these views are still being ignored
by most people who should know better." Yes, we do! So far, we
human beings have ignored the concept of reaching the whole life
proposed by Schrodinger, and ignored all the laws, mechanisms,
states, structures, functions, negative entropy, mechanisms, andconfigurations that restrict life except gene theory. Schrodinger
wanted us to "try to synthesize all known knowledge into a unified
whole." This is exactly What Is Life? The purpose of! So we say that
Schrodinger is the scientific giant, master and pioneer of "whole life
science". Schrodinger has explained what is life from the life
phenomenon of time, space, living organism, self-reproduction - the
four elements of simultaneity. Or What is Life? It is the Bible of
"holistic biology"!
20, "whole life science" is the arrival of big science in the 21st
century, people began to understand the movement of life from the
perspective of holism and system, which is a trend that is long
overdue and inevitable worldwide trend. Because the complexity and
integrity of the life sciences cannot be fully explained by classical
experimental biology, molecular biology, genomics and proteomics.
What Is Life? To establish a "whole life science" with Chinese
characteristics to complete this historical task! This is the need of the
rise of great powers, and it is the inevitable historical trend of the
development of the "holistic" historical view of Chinese civilization for
50000 years.
"Whole life science" this is the world trend, this is the world
trend! This is the world life science in the "human sustainable
survival" development of a sharp turn, must produce a big science!
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 119
Chapter 12 Origin of ecological entropy of life
An ecological entropy is due to the Big Bang Force
Ancient Greek science giant Plato said, "the earth is a huge living
organism," and 3,000 years later, the scientist Lavrov's "Gaia
hypothesis" scientific experiments proved; In the same way, the
universe, the earth, the planets, all the galaxies have life.
The universe began with a "singularity" big "bang", and the
explosion requires super-giant energy to produce a big bang at a
singularity, which is the Big Bang force; Given the nature of life in the
universe, the "expansion" of the forces of the Big Bang in a big Bang
life property forms the "ecological entropy", which is proved by the
Hawking Big Bang theory:Hawking said: "The great mystery at the heart of the Big Bang is
to explain how an impossibly large, entire universe with space and
energy could have come out of nothing. The secret lies in one of the
strangest facts about our universe. The laws of physics require that
there is something called negative energy." - Ecological entropy is due
to the Big Bang Force!
Hawking went on to explain: [The Big Bang produced a lot of
positive energy, and it also produced an equal amount of negative
energy. In this way, positive and negative always add up to zero. This
is another law of nature.
So where is all this negative energy today? It's in the third
ingredient in our cosmic recipe: it's in space. It may sound strange,
but according to the natural laws of gravity and motion - some of the
oldest in science - space itself is a huge storehouse of negative energy,
enough to ensure that everything adds up to zero. 】 -- Stephen
Hawking, Reflections on Ten Questions
Conclusion: Ecological entropy is due to the Big Bang force!
Hawking's "a huge warehouse of negative energy" is the origin of the
"ecological entropy cosmic Big Bang force"; It is also the source of
Schrodinger's "life lives on negative entropy"!
The origin of two singularities
Aaargh! The Singularity! One of the most amazing space-time
singularities of the Big Bang!
"The origin of the singularity" Hawking said this:
[A single point of infinite density, a space-time singularity.
Einstein's general theory of relativity breaks down at this point.
Therefore, it cannot be used to predict how the universe began. The
remaining question of the origin of the universe is clearly beyond the
scope of science.
In October 1965, a few months after my first singularity result,
observational evidence that the universe had a very dense beginning
was obtained with the discovery of the faint microwave background
throughout space. These are the same microwaves as those in your
microwave oven, but with much lower power. They will only heat your
pizza to -270.4 degrees Celsius, which is not useful for defrosting a
pizza, let alone cooking it. You can actually observe these microwaves
for yourself. Those who remember analog television have almost
certainly seen these microwaves. Such asIf you've ever set your TV to an empty channel, what percentage
of the snow you see on the screen is
Caused by this microwave background. The only plausible
explanation for this background is that it is radiation left over from an
earlier, very hot and dense state. As the universe expanded, the
radiation cooled until it became the faint remnant we observe today.
I and many others do not like the idea that the universe began
with a singularity. Einstein's theory of general relativity
The reason for the collapse near the Big Bang is that it is the
so-called classical theory. That is, it implicitly assumes
What may seem obvious from common sense is that every
particle has a well-defined position and a well-defined
Speed. In this so-called classical theory, if you know the positions
and values of all the particles in the universe at one point in time
Speed, you can calculate their value at any other time in the past
or future. However, in the early 20th century,
The scientists found that they could not calculate exactly what
would happen at very short distances. It's not just
They need a better theory. There seems to be some degree of
randomness or uncertainty in nature, none
No matter how good our theories are, they can't be removed. It
can be summed up by the German scientist Werner Hay
Sember proposed the uncertainty principle in 1927. One cannot
accurately predict the bit of a particle at the same time
Set and speed. The more accurately you can predict the position,
the less accurately you can predict the speed, and vice versa. 】
The three cosmic genetic codes at the "singularity" already exist
for the quantum properties of cosmic life
"Newton gave us the answer. Hawking gave us the problem.
Hawking's question itself would go on to produce breakthroughs for
decades. When we finally grasp the laws of quantum gravity and fully
understand the birth of the universe, it may be thanks largely to
standing on Hawking's shoulders." -- Kip S. Thorne
There are only two types of waves that travel through the
universe and give us information about distant things:
electromagnetic waves (including light, X-rays, gamma rays,
microwaves, radio waves...). And gravitational waves. Electromagneticwaves consist of oscillating electric and magnetic forces that travel at
the speed of light. They hit charged particles, such as electrons in
radio or television wires, and they rock the particles back and forth,
stripping the information carried by the waves in the particles. This
information can then be amplified and fed to speakers or television
screens for comprehension - the only invisible channel for human
knowledge and information communication in the distant universe.
On March 17, 2014, physicists in the United States announced
that they had found the first direct evidence of the existence of
gravitational waves in the universe.
Physicists at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
and other institutions in the United States used the BICEP2 telescope
set up in the South Pole to observe the microwave background
radiation, the "ember" of the Big Bang. The microwave background
radiation is formed by the microwave background photons that
permeate the space in the universe, and the calculation shows that
the primary gravitational wave acting on the microwave background
photons will produce a special polarization mode called B-mode,
which is not produced by other forms of perturbation, so B-mode
polarizationVIRGO scientists have announced the detection of
gravitational waves produced by the merger of two black holes about
30 times the mass of the Sun 1.3 billion years ago, in what has been
called the "discovery of the century."
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life) 1.
In fact, the evolution of the universe is entirely determined by
the laws of science. This once and for all solves the first push problem
that has plagued mankind since the time of Newton. In the
framework of boundary-free cosmology one can study the universe's
burst, structure, isotropy, rotation, dimension, arrow of time,
primordial black holes and primordial gravitational waves - eventually
they will begin to attract each other and will come together in a big
squeeze. This will be the end of the history of the universe in space
time.
About 1 second after the birth of the universe, the temperature
everywhere was about 10 billion degrees in line with "light elements.
Abundance"
Evidence for the origin of the hot, dense universe. Knowing thetemperature of heat radiation today, it is easy to calculate from the
Hot Big Bang theory that the temperature of the universe at about 1
second after its birth was about 10 billion degrees, which is too high
for the synthesis of existing atomic nuclei. At that point matter must
have been torn apart into its most basic components to form a soup
of quarks and gluons, such as protons, neutrons and electrons. But as
the soup gets cold, a nuclear reaction could emerge.
The Big Bang model can be used to calculate the proportion of
light elements such as helium-4, helium-3, deuterium and lithium-7
relative to ordinary hydrogen elements in the universe. The
abundance of all these light elements depends on a single parameter,
the ratio of photons to baryons in the early universe, and this
parameter is calculated independently of the specific segments of
fluctuations in microwave background radiation. The Big Bang theory
predicts that the ratio of light elements (here the ratio of the total
mass of the elements rather than the number of elements) is about:
helium-4 / hydrogen =0.25, deuterium/hydrogen =10^-3, helium-3 /
hydrogen =10^-4, lithium-7 / hydrogen =10^-7 - approximately 1/3...
The measured abundences of various light elements are roughly
in agreement with the theoretical values derived from the photon
baryon ratio. The best agreement between the theoretical value and
the measured value is deuterium, the theoretical value of helium-4 is
close to the measured value but there is still a difference, and the
difference between lithium-7 is two times. There is a large systematic
random error in the calculation of the latter two elements.
Nevertheless, the abundances of light elements predicted by the Big
Bang nucleosynthesis theory can be considered to be basically
consistent with actual observations, which is a strong support for the
Big Bang theory. So far, no other theory has been able to explain and
give the relative abundances of these light elements.
5 Cosmic Life Accelerates' Expansion 'and' Death '
Perlmutter, Riess and Schmidt studied a phenomenon that
occurs late in the evolution of some massive stars when their cores
and shells separate, known as the mega-bang. Stars 8 to 25 times the
mass of the Sun end their lives as supernovae, and the outer gas
envelope of the star is thrown away at high speed, and the absolute
luminosity can exceed 10 billion times that of the Sun. Analyzing
specific types of supernova explosions, the team of Perlmutter, Riess,and Schmidt found that more than 50 supernovae appeared fainter
than previously expected. The explanation for this result is that the
expansion of the universe is accelerating. The discovery was described
by the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences as "shaking the
foundations of cosmology" - for which Saul Perlmutter and Adam Lee
wrote
Brian Schmidt, a dual citizen of the United States and Australia,
won the 2011 Nobel Prize in Physics.
Six Big Bang Planck time (seconds) and energy ring scale①
At a singularity 13.8 billion years old, there was a flash bang;
10-43 seconds after the Big Bang (Planck time) : About 1032 degrees,
the universe emerged from the quantum fluctuation background, a
phase called Planck time.
Previously, the density of the universe could have been more
than 1094 grams per cubic centimeter, more than 1078 times the
density of protons, and all the forces in physics are one.
(Supersymmetry) At this stage, the universe has cooled to the point
where gravity can begin to exist independently by separating out, and
there are gravitons that transmit gravitational interactions. The other
forces in the universe (the strong, weak and electromagnetic
interactions) remain one;
10-35 seconds after the Big Bang: about 1027 degrees, the
inflationary period (first push), gravity has been separated, quarks,
bosons, leptons formed. At this stage, the universe has cooled enough
that the strong interaction can be separated out, while the weak
phase interaction and the electromagnetic interaction are still unified
in the so-called electroweak interaction.
The universe began to undergo inflation, which lasted only 10-33
seconds, during which time the universe experienced 100 doubling
(2100), resulting in a scale 1030 times larger than the previous scale
(the inflation is the universe itself, that is, space and time itself, which
does not violate the speed of light barrier). Before inflation, the
universe was within the interconnectable range of photons,
smoothing out all the rough points, and by the time inflation stopped,
the things we detect today had stabilized in their own small regions,
which is known as inflation theory.
10-12 seconds after the Big Bang: about 1015 degrees, theparticle phase, protons and neutrons and their antiparticles form, and
bosons, neutrinos, electrons, quarks, and gluons stabilize.
The universe becomes cold enough that the electroweak
interaction breaks down into the electromagnetic interaction and the
weak interaction. The lepton family (electrons, neutrinos, and
corresponding antiparticles) had to wait for the universe to cool for
another 10-4 seconds to separate from the equilibrium phase with
other particles. Neutrinos, once decoupled from matter, travel freely
through space, and in principle can be detected. -- From the Internet
Seven Big Bang Planck time (seconds) and energy ring scale ②
0.01 seconds after the Big Bang: about 100 billion degrees,
photons, electrons, neutrinos, protons and neutrons accounted for
only 1/1 billion, thermal equilibrium, the system rapidly expanded,
temperature and density continued to decline.
0.1 seconds after the Big Bang: about 30 billion degrees, the
neutron-proton ratio dropped from 1.0 to 0.61.
One second after the Big Bang: about 10 billion degrees, the
neutrinos escaped outward, the electron-positron annihilation
reaction occurred, and the nuclear force was not enough to bind
neutrons and protons.
10 seconds after the Big Bang: about 3 billion degrees, the
nuclear period, hydrogen, helium stable nuclei (chemical elements)
formed. When the universe cooled below 109 kelvins (about 100
seconds later), the particle transition became impossible.
Nucleosynthesis calculations indicate that the density of baryons is
only 2% to 5% of the matter required for a topologically flat universe,
strongly suggesting that other forms of matter energy (non-baryonic
dark matter and dark energy) fill the universe.
35 minutes after the Big Bang: about 300 million degrees, the
primary nucleosynthesis process stopped, and neutral atoms could
not yet be formed.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 123
1011 seconds (104 years) after the Big Bang, the temperature
was about 105 Kelvin, the matter period. In the early history of the
universe, light dominated all forms of energy. As the universe expands,
the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation is stretched, and theenergy of photons decreases. The radiation energy density decreases
inversely with the product of scale (R) and volume (4π r3/4), i.e. the
amper1 /R4 decreases, whereas the energy density of matter simply
decreases inversely with volume (1/R3). Ten thousand years later, the
density of matter caught up with the density of radiation and
surpassed it, and from then on, the universe and its dynamics became
dominated by matter.
300,000 years after the Big Bang: about 3000 degrees, chemical
bonding causes neutral atoms to form, and the universe is mainly
composed of gaseous matter, and gradually condensed into higher
density gas clouds under the action of self-gravity, until the stars and
star systems.
The quantum vacuum reached its peak during inflation, and then
permeated the universe in the form of dark energy, which became
more and more apparent as the density of matter and radiation
rapidly decreased. Dark energy may account for as much as two-thirds
of the total energy density of the universe, driving the universe's
accelerating expansion.
On June 1, 2021, a team of European scientists used the Large
Hadron Collider (LHC) to reveal new details of what happened in the
first 0.000001 second of the Big Bang, that is, what happened in the
first microsecond to a special kind of plasma, which is not only the
"first matter" in the history of the universe. The details also provide
an important piece of the puzzle for the evolution of the universe as
we know it today.
-- From the Internet
124 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
Chapter 13 reveals the encryption of the Big Bang genetic code
principles in the universal legacy representations of the planetary
solar system
Kepler's Universal Law of Planets
Kepler's original statement in Cosmological Harmony: For all
planets in elliptical orbits centered on the Sun, the ratio of the cube ofthe semi-major axis of their respective elliptical orbits to the square
of the period is a constant; Is the "universal law" - a common
statement: the ratio of the semimajor axis of the orbit of all planets
around the same central body to the third power (a³) is equal to its
orbital period to the second power (T²). Kepler's law is a universal law
that applies to all two-body problems. Kepler's law applies not only to
the solar system, but also to gravitational systems with central bodies
(such as planet-satellite systems) and binary star systems. Several
bodies moving around the same central body have the same ratio of
the radius of their orbits to the square of the period.
Two Kepler planets three laws
Most of the actual star problems are two-body problems. In
practical application, people regard Kepler's law as the expression of
Newton's law and the law of gravitation. (M is the mass of the central
celestial body, m is the mass of the planet);
Kepler's three planetary laws:
One: The orbit of the planet is elliptical, and the star is in an
elliptic center (focus). Two: The line between the planet and the star
(vector) sweeps the same area per unit time.
Three: the orbital radius of the planets in the solar system
R(ellipse axis) cube is proportional to the square of the planetary
operation period T, that is, R^3=kT^2 Kepler constant k=3.354*10^13
m ^3/ s ^2.
The broad spectrum encryption and application of Kepler's third
Law from the intelligent Force of the Big Bang:
(a) By measuring the rotation period and semi-major axis of the
body, calculate the mass of the double star and estimate the mass of
the central object;
(2) By the orbital period of two planets moving around the same
central body, the average distance between the two planets and the
central body is calculated. (Because the actual orbit is elliptical, the
average distance is used).
(3) In the star-arrow separation problem, the ratio of the
semi-major axis of the star-arrow moving trajectory is calculated by
the ratio of the elliptical motion period of the star and arrow.
Kepler revealed the secret of the harmony of the whole life
system of the great universe system
Kepler lamented that "Copernicus did not perceive the wealththat lay within his grasp." Because Copernicus knew that several
circles could be combined to produce an ellipse, he never used
ellipses to describe the orbits of celestial bodies, and continued
Ptolemy's epicycles, ignoring a complete sum that had formed since
the Big Bang
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 125
Rigorous.
Cape's hunch that the universe formed by the Big Bang, the
simplest big universe system, only with seven ellipses to solve the
whole universe life code. And the precise calculation of the planets
formed by the big bang, in line with the "self-gravitational
condensation into a high density gas cloud, until the star and star
system" motion law.
Kepler's laws demonstrate that the planetary world is a
symmetrical (what Kepler called "harmonious") whole system. The
sun is at one of the focal points of each planet's orbit. The period of a
planet's orbit is determined by the distance of each planet from the
sun, regardless of its mass. In fact, from Tycho's more than 20 years of
hard observation to Kepler's long-term careful calculation of Kepler's
three laws, under the conditions of no telescope at that time, there is
no big Bang theory, can accurately predict the big Bang "ten thousand
years later, the density of matter catches up with the density of
radiation and exceeds it, and from then on, The universe and its
dynamics became dominated by matter." And the calculation of the
three laws of harmonious planetary movement of the universe is
indeed a valuable miracle of the world astronomy! It can be said that
the law of "the universe and its dynamics began to be dominated by
matter", which reveals the genetic code of life in the Big Bang, and
the secret book of cosmic harmony!
The mysterious cycle of Halley's comet shows that the universal
harmony of gravity began in the Big Bang
The mystery of Halley's comet's "cycle" in the universe should
have started with the Big Bang.
The earliest record of Halley's comet in the world is from the
seventh year of Emperor Qin Shi Huang (240 BC) to 1910, Halley's
comet returned 29 times; British physicist Edmond Halley (1656-1742)used Newton's law of gravitation to determine its orbit and predicted
that Halley's comet (periodic list number: 1P/ Halley) orbits the Sun
every 76.1 years. Comets, commonly known as comets, are objects
that orbit the Sun. More than 1,600 comets have been discovered,
but few are visible to the naked eye. Halley studied Tycho's
observations and found records of large comets in 1456, 1378, 1301,
1245, and until 1066, and realized that this was the same comet.
Halley published his Treatise on the Astronomy of Comets in
1705, announcing that the great comet that had caused great panic in
1682 had reappeared in the sky in 1758, and that due to the motion
of Jupiter, the return was likely to be in 1759. Halley, who was over
fifty, said regrettably: "If the comet finally reappears, as we predict,
about 1758, impartial posterity will not forget that it was first
discovered by an Englishman..."
In March 1759, observatories around the world waited for
Halley's prediction of the comet. On March 13, this bright comet with
a long tail appeared in the sky, proving that Newton's law of
gravitation is the first law of the universe!
It is! The next time human beings see Halley's comet must be
around 2062 - here, we trace the mystery of the ancient cycle of
Halley's comet, should be in the time node of the big Bang in the
"cycle" instinct, to find the genetic instruction information of Halley's
comet cycle rotation "The universe is mainly composed of gaseous
matter, and gradually.
It condenses into a dense cloud of gas under the action of
self-gravity until the star andTherefore, to this day, the apple tree at
Newton's grandmother's house is known as the "flower of Kent" - this
is not the late information of the Big Bang genetic code in Newton's
soul suddenly "flash" : The Big Bang confirms that "(supersymmetry)
at this stage, the universe has cooled to the point where gravity can
separate out and begin to exist independently, with gravitons that
transmit gravitational interactions."
No one can deny that the discovery of Neptune is inseparable
from the universal soul information of Newton's law of gravitation.
French astronomer Boval is through the law of gravity, the actual orbit
of Uranus and the error of the mathematical calculation of the orbit
of bold speculation to confirm that there is a giant planet in the outerspace of Uranus, with gravity interfering with the rotation of Uranus,
for the discovery of Neptune buried the foetal.
In prehistoric times, the Greeks recorded that Galileo, John
Cauchy Adams, Auburn Le Verrier, and John Gefrien Galer had long
predicted the existence of Uranus, but without Newton's law of
gravitation, many physicists in the history of the Big Bang movement
can have a profound understanding.
In 1687, Newton put forward the law of universal gravitation in
the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Newton revealed
that "there is gravitation between any body"; As the universe cooled
to a "degree" in the Big Bang, gravity "began to exist independently,
with gravitons transmitting gravitational interactions." The law of
gravitation proves that in celestial bodies "there is gravity between
any object" a kind of universal soul information confirmation and
universality, is the discovery of Neptune is a successful application of
Newton's law of gravitation in astronomy.
In 1821, the French astronomer Bouvard published a table of the
orbits of Uranus. Through his own observations, Boval discovered a
secret: Uranus's orbit and the theoretical orbit calculated by Boval
have a certain gap! So, Bouvard reflected: Could Uranus be affected
by the gravitational influence of a nearby planet, causing its orbit to
be different from the calculated orbit?
In 1843, British astronomer Adams calculated the possible
influence of the rotation of Uranus
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 127
The orbit of the eighth planet in the solar system, which Adams
reported to the Royal Society; At this time, the U.K.
Astronomer John Herschel used mathematical methods to
constantly search for signs of new planets, and French astronomer Le
Verrier asked German astronomer Johann Gevereen Galle, who
worked at the Berlin Observatory, to search for signs of new planets.
In the end, the German astronomer Dahurst and Galle together, found
traces of Neptune, confirmed that the eighth planet of the solar
system, revealed and proved that the law of gravity is the universal
law of the big Bang, hidden to explore the all-weather function of the
big Bang gene code!Seven useful measurements of the temperature distribution of
hot gas in galaxies and star clusters
Force effects affect the entire cluster to find dark matter
Scientists have found that the gravitational effect of measuring
the temperature distribution of hot gas in galaxies and star clusters
affects the entire cluster to find dark matter. That is, by measuring the
spectral shape and energy flow of the X-ray band of hot gas, we can
probably deduce the temperature and density of the gas.
Temperature and density give us the pressure of the gas. Assuming
that the gas's gravitational force from the cluster is balanced by its
own pressure, we can get the mass distribution of the cluster; It turns
out that normally glowing galaxies are only about 1% of the mass of
the cluster. The mass of the hot gas is about 10% of the mass of the
cluster. About 90% of the mass of the remaining component does not
emit light, but still affects the entire cluster through gravity, so it may
be dark matter. Here, it is Newton's law of gravitation, not Einstein's
equations, that matter!
In 1970, Vera Rubin and Kent Ford studied the rotation speed of
stars in the Andromeda Nebula, using high-precision spectral
measurement techniques, they were able to detect the relationship
between the speed and distance of the outer stars in the region far
from the galactic core. According to Newton's law of gravitation, if the
mass of a galaxy is concentrated in the visible stars in the galactic core,
the velocity of the stars on the outskirts of the galaxy will decrease
with distance. In fact, the observations show that the velocity of the
stars in the periphery of the galaxy is constant over a considerable
range, proving that the large amount of invisible matter in the galaxy
is not only distributed in the core region of the galaxy, but its mass is
much greater than the sum of the masses of the luminous stars. Thus,
the discovery of "dark matter"!
8 Modern World Scientists Admit the Big Bang was' God's mind '
The great astronomer Kepler had a solemn definition of
astronomy: "To study astronomy is to study the mind of God."
German mathematician Leibniz also said: "Order, uniformity and
harmony surprise us... God is pure order. He is the creator of universal
harmony."
Eddington said, "Modern physics necessarily leads us to God -
not away from him - and no atheist inventor is a natural scientist." Allthese dumb inventors are mediocre philosophers."
Schrodinger, who wrote the groundbreaking work What Is Life,
said: "The structural elements of life are not the clumsy work of man,
but the most elaborate masterpiece of God's quantum mechanics,
which is completed according to a few basic principles."
The famous German biologist Ixkull said: "Whoever praises the
plan, purpose and intention of creation will praise the existence of the
creator God."
German biologist Baer said, "What we hear today in the
language of nature is a marvelous symphony of sublime regularity and
beauty." One day, when I examined the human body. I believed I had
heard a most persuasive sermon. I take off my hat and I'm going to
sing Hallelujah."
The German physicist Nernst, who won the Nobel Prize in 1920,
said, "To work in physics is to look at God's creation from behind."
The French physicist Carrel said, "Man needs God just as he
needs water and oxygen."
German chemist Liebig said: "People try to read the mind of the
creator from the huge book of nature, so that they can truly
understand the great boundless intelligence of the Creator."
Edison, the world's king of invention, said: "... We owe all
engineers the greatest respect and admiration, but the greatest of all
is God!"
The German airship inventor Zeppelin said, "God is an artist, and
I am only his instrument."
Cauchy, a famous French mathematician, once said, "I am a
Christian, that is, like Tycho, Copernicus, Descartes, Newton, Leibniz,
Basca... Then, too, I believe in the divinity of Christ. They are the
greatest astronomers and mathematicians in history."
The Italian electrician Volta said, "... My faith in God has brought
me great results."
"The more we learn about nature, the better we understand its
God and its role in the cosmic drama," said Compton, an American
physicist.
Linnais, the founding scientist of Systematics, said: "Therefore,
the immutability of these ancestors must be attributed to some
all-powerful and all-knowing God, who is called God..." 】Subverting the original Nobel Prize in physics, the Chinese
scientist Yang Zhenning also acknowledged that there is a "creator" -
the 2022 Nobel Prize in Physics has proved that "when a human body
and representation do not exist, then they will exist in other worlds,
but in the case of dissociation." After death, some people say there
are ghosts and spirits, which are really particles, tiny things. "Like,
when I have this idea, somewhere out there is someone else who has
the same idea." Theology is that people can go beyond, that particles
can borrow the bodies of other people, that information from the
bodies (which is also a particle) can guide behavior, and continue to
operate." ... "People's mode of production has changed, but people's
lifestyle has not changed, they still have to eat, sleep, exercise and so
on." There is a strange phenomenon, looks, personality will also be
inherited across generations, why? Some people say that the reason
is genetic, with quantum mechanical entanglement, we may be able
to understand that in fact, life did not die, but changed a way of
existence, but can not be seen by the naked eye. After a period of
time, the particles will attach to the living things, become tangible
things, and the cycle starts again." - Quantum Mechanics: Man does
not die, Man does not exist, Man comes from a personal definition
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 129
9. Spooky action at a distance is a reversal of the
Michelson-Morley experiment
In October 2022, the Chairman of the Nobel Physics Committee
said that the research of the three Nobel laureates on entangled
states has gone beyond the fundamental problem of explaining
quantum mechanics, that is, because on the basis of the research of
the three physicists, quantum entanglement has been experimentally
confirmed and utilized in many physical systems. For example, in our
laboratory, the laser passes through a nonlinear crystal, which will
produce a spontaneous parametric downconversion process, and a
pump photon will split into a pair of photons to meet the phase
matching conditions. This pair of photons is in a particular entangled
state. No matter how far apart these two photons are, for example,
one is left in my laboratory and the other is sent into space by the
Micius satellite, as long as we measure the state of the photon in mylaboratory, we can instantly know its state without doing any
operation on the other photon in distant space.
In 1935, Einstein and two other physicists, Boris Podolsky and
Nathan Rosen, wrote a famous paper called the Can
quantum-mechanical description What of physical reality be
considered complete? .
In the paper, they put forward a principle that questions the
completeness of quantum mechanics: that is, no interaction in space
can travel faster than the speed of light, which means that quantum
entanglement at a distance violates the principle of locality. Thus,
according to entanglement and ghosts and "action at a distance" is
real!
We have to rethink the Michelson-Morley experiment (where
the speed of light never changes) : Experiments carefully set up
interferometers and beamsplitters to measure the speed of the
aether wind, which travels at different times of the year to explain the
Earth's movement -- Experiments completely ignore and deny
entanglement and ghosts and "action at a distance" (when -
Michelson-Morley Experiment), It is a famous physics experiment
done by Michelson and Morley in Cleveland, United States, in 1887 to
measure the difference in the speed of light between two vertical
light with the Michelson interferometer. But it turns out that the
speed of light is the same in different inertial frames and different
directions, thus denying the existence of aether (an absolute
stationary reference frame), thus shaking the foundation of classical
physics...) This is an experiment in the history of anti-science - for
[Entanglement and ghosts and "Action at a distance"] as early as 1885,
Mach wrote the "Analysis of Sensation" paper, which was hugely
influential at that time, and ghost physics was hugely successful in
changing the psychology of sensation; As early as 1664, Descartes
proposed the idea of "aether" - Aether theory. The word "Ether" is a
transliteration of the English ether or Aether. First proposed by the
ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, the idea is a universal substance
whose contents evolve with the development of physics. In Aristotle's
view, in addition to water, fire, air, and earth, there is an ether that
resides in the upper part of the sky. Aether has a mysterious color in
the history of science, generally referring to the blue sky or the upper
atmosphere, which is equivalent to the quantum of entanglement andghosts and "action at a distance" that is proven today!
In 1270 AD, the Arab scientist Al Hassen's "Optical Complete
book" also known as "Optical treasure", the application of spherical
mirrors and parabolic mirrors to discover the magnification effect of
lenses and atmospheric refraction, becoming the first scholar to study
optics; Kitab al-Manazir (Optical Treasure), considered by many to be
Ibn Hesser
M's most important contribution. It was translated into Latin in
1270 as Alhazen's Treatise on Optics. In fact, the main work in ancient
Greek optics is Ptolemy's "Grand Treatise", the book of Ptolemy's
astronomical observations, the earliest date is March 26, 127 AD, the
latest date is February 2, 141. According to the records left by Ptolemy,
all of his astronomical observations were made in Alexandria, Egypt
(then under Roman rule);
Huygens argued that "the state of the waves in any part of the
medium is determined by the waves in all parts" and that the aether
is largely connected with the wave theory of light as a load of light
waves. The wave theory of light was first proposed by R. Hooke and
further developed by C. Huygens. In the 17th century, Descartes
further enriched the meaning of "aether". - French mathematician R.
Huygens Descartes developed the aether vortex theory to explain the
motion of the planets in the solar system. Descartes' concept of
aether not only overturns Aristotle's virtual hypothesis of "aether",
but also enricheth the imagination space of future physics and
becomes a great scientist who foresees quantum teleportation -
"quantum teleportation is the way of transferring unknown quantum
states from one particle to another particle, and this process does not
need to transfer the particle itself."
In other words, from Aristotle, Ptolemy, all the way to Descartes,
generations of scientists have used experimental data for 3,000 years
to prove that quantum entanglement is real and unify the ether and
quantum, confirming Einstein's mistake! ...
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 131Chapter 14
The Big Bang Life Forms the three-dimensional standing Body of
DNA Structure and the Soft Closed System of Life
For a life to be "alive" there must be a "soft closed system"
What is a "soft closed system"?
The category of the concept of soft closed systems is: any species
of individual in the earth and the biological world. Plato to 80
Lavrov's "Gaia hypothesis" experiment proved that "the Earth is
a living giant organism - Plato"; There is a soft atmosphere in the
outer layer of the earth, which protects the earth from the invasion of
space planets, especially small stars. In the same way, no matter what
kind of individual organism on the earth, we can regard it as a special
and certain "microclimate", that is, as a special and certain (soft)
closed system; Whether it's autotrophic or heterotrophicIn Darwin's
laws of quantitative change in the multiplication or reduction of
species, if the community of species (cat - mouse - bee - grass - man)
is regarded as a collection of biological energy (energy matrix unit), it
will naturally form the quantitative value and quantitative change law
of a certain situation of ecological energy (entropy) balance, which is
a table of the quantitative change of ecological energy W.
If we take the equator as the earth's maximum ecological energy
(quantity) diameter line, from the equator to the North and south
polar ring latitude line, it will naturally form a two-way (to the South
Pole, to the North Pole) spiral, with the North and South poles as a
spiral
The singularity of a line constitutes the region of an infinite set of
complex functions of ecological energy distributed in the earth,
geology and geography
The entropy of the domain is arranged regularly in two
symmetrical spiral systems.
It can be seen that ecological energy entropy is always in a very
complex dynamic dissipation process, and it is a dynamic "negative
entropy" effect of the dynamic equilibrium distribution of the infinitefinite and infinite collection of biological energy communities.
Therefore, Schrodinger's quantum mechanical concept of life is:
"Life lives on negative entropy"!
"Ecological entropy" next to three soft closed Systems
Entropy is a physical system concept. Schrodinger integrated
physics into biology and used quantum mechanics to create physical
biology. It is also used in life processes to calculate disorder and
complexity in a system. Entropy is also an indicator of biodiversity in
ecology. It originates from the "soft closed system" of life and is
determined by the multi-dimensional "soft" system of life, which is
large and small. Entropy is not a concept borrowed from physics
outside the life sciences; Although the second law of thermodynamics
attempts to explain the phenomenon of life and life, it is only a major
breakthrough in the history of life science cognition in physical life.
The "soft closed system" of earth and life has existed since the
beginning of life 4.6 billion years (10 billion years from the big Bang),
all bacteria exist, after billions of years of species evolution, to the
emergence of human beings, until scientists discovered the second
law of thermodynamics in the 19th century; The concept of entropy
was first proposed by Clausius in 1864 and applied to
thermodynamics; Later in 1948 by Claude Ellwood Shannon first
introduced to information theory - fortunately, the world's quantum
physics master Schrodinger as early as 5 years ago in 1943, in the
Institute for Advanced Study of Trinity College in the United Kingdom
made a series of lectures, on the creation of the 20th century's
greatest scientific classic "What is Life?" (Published September 1944.
What Is Life? Epoch-making historical works unlock the endless
mystery of deep historical evolution in the concept of life, and for the
first time in human history make it clear that "entropy" and "living"
life are the only secrets that can be sustained and long-term existence
- any kind of life individual is a "soft closed system" and "life lives by
negative entropy"!
Four "ecological entropy" four elements
"Ecological entropy" does not refer to the degree of uncertainty
of a thing. Nor does it refer to the probability of a thing as in
information technology where the formula is I=lg(p),p. "Ecological
entropy" is an indispensable energy element of life.
There are four elements of ecological entropy:Sunshine, water, air, food.
Because the Earth is a huge living organism - Plato, the ratio of
water to land has been 7:3 since the Earth was born 10 billion years
ago - the Earth is literally a giant water balloon (a giant soft closed
system). Therefore, the water content of all living organisms on Earth
is in the range of approximately 7:3; If water is not absorbed by cells,
it cannot participate in a series of life metabolism activities of the
human body (organism), and life will no longer exist; One cannot
leave the water. In the mid-1950s, scientists discovered the presence
of a
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 133
This kind of channel only allows water molecules to enter and
exit, and American scientists Agre and Mackinnon discovered the
"membrane waterway"
Won the Nobel Prize in 2003; It is revealed that water is essential
to the human body (living body), and water channel is the most
important cell membrane channel of all living objects. Naturally water
is one of the elements of "ecological entropy"!
The second element is air. The human body is inseparable from
air every second, which is the nature of the creation: people and
animals breathe in oxygen, exhale carbon dioxide; In contrast, plants
breathe in carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen to maintain a balance of
air components.
In 1798, Malthus put forward two Malthusian principles in the
Theory of Population, one is that food is necessary for human survival;
Second, sexual desire between the sexes is inevitable. Humans can't
live without food! Malthus is the precious record of the theory of
"food entropy" left by the first English priest. On the eve of his
graduation from Cambridge University, Malthus read Gibbon's The
Fall of the Roman Empire, which dealt with the origin and
development of the barbarian peoples who had formed the exquisite
polity of today's Europe, and revealed the vital importance of food
(entropy) plunder in the formation of nations!
From the perspective of scientific history, the concept of entropy
was first proposed by Clausius in 1864 and applied to
thermodynamics, and was first introduced into information theory byClaude Ellwood Shannon in 1948. Fortunately, in 1943, the famous
physicist Schrodinger gave a lecture at Trinity College in the United
Kingdom, and the lecture was published in 1944 in the epoch-making
historical drama What Is Life? Systemically and uniquely across the
physics community, it puts forward the law of life that "life lives by
negative entropy".
Schrodinger said, "So what is there in our food that is so precious
that we can save ourselves from death?" This question is easy to
answer. Every process, event, happening-whatever it may be called, in
short, everything that is happening in nature means an increase in the
entropy of the part of the world in which it is happening. As a result,
living organisms are constantly increasing their entropy - or producing
positive entropy, if you like - towards the dangerous maximum
entropy state, which is death. The only way to get rid of death or to
live is to absorb negative entropy from the environment - which, as
we will soon see, is a very positive thing. Organisms live on negative
entropy. Or, less paradoxically, the essence of metabolism is to enable
the organism to successfully eliminate all the entropy that it had to
produce while it was alive." ! _ What Is Life? Since ancient times, it
has comprehensively established and improved the three elements of
"ecological entropy"!
Five "ecological entropy" three elements are the energy source
of life "soft closed system"
The origin of the soft closed system of life should be
synchronized with the origin of the earliest biological bacteria on
Earth, because the earth appeared about 10 billion years after the Big
Bang, and the earliest form of life was microbial bacteria.
Modern Scientific Records, March 2017 "According to the
Spanish newspaper El Pais on March 1, An international team of
geologists, paleontologists and nanoscientists from London, the
United States and Norway has discovered fossils of bacteria between
3.77 billion and 4.28 billion years old in the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone
belt in Hudson Bay in northern Quebec, Canada, 4.5 billion years after
the birth of Earth. Therefore, the bacterialized stone found here is
considered to be the oldest known evidence of life." ... "The
Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt contains
Some of the oldest sedimentary rocks known to geology - proofthat the soft closed systems of life should have originated at the same
time as Earth's first biological germs!
Six ancient fossils prove that bacteria and microbes were born
about 10 billion years ago
Modern science says that "at source, these sedimentary rocks
are part of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent rich in radioactive iron."
Many scientists believe that these energy-rich and mineral-rich places
were the cradle of the first life forms -- the first bacteria -- on Earth
four billion years ago." -- "Scientists find the oldest known evidence of
life: 4 billion years ago bacteria fossil 2017-03-03 00:21:02 Source:
Reference News network responsible editor: Zhou Qinghao"
According to Hawking's "big bang" theory, the universe and the
earth need a cooling period of 600-800 million years, so that 13.8
billion years removed 1 billion years is 12.8 billion years, so the sun
and the earth cooled to the appearance of microorganisms in about
10 billion years is completely possible; Modern archaeology believes
that between 3.77 billion and 4.28 billion years ago, in the timeline of
the Big Bang, bacteria appeared 10 billion years after the birth of the
Earth, so that the Earth can be deposited into fossils during the long
geological evolution process after cooling. And because
microorganisms enter the fossil formation requires a long water and
land transition; Therefore, microbes must predate geological
changes...
Matthew Dodd, a scientist at University College London, said the
findings support the theory that life sprouted in deep-sea thermal
vents shortly after the birth of the Earth. The rapid birth of life on
Earth is also consistent with the previous discovery of some microbes
that are 3.7 billion years old - this modern science does not take into
account the Big Bang!
Ancient Greece had long revealed the life nature of the "soft
closed system" of the human body
The "soft closed system" theory of human body has a history of
more than 3,000 years. In 450 BC, the ancient Greek doctor saint as
early as Hippocrates research found "body fluid theory" : Hippocrates
humoral theory: temperament depends on the body of blood, mucus,
yellow bile, black bile and other four kinds of liquid mixing ratio.
Although the term bacteria was first coined by German scientist
Christian Gottfried Ehrenberg (1795-1876) in 1828 to refer to acertain type of bacteria, The word comes from the Greek βακτηριον,
meaning "small stick", it can be seen that there was a small soft
expression and record of bacterial form in ancient Greece.
Galen has a deep sympathy for bodily fluids, and wrote
"Temperament" and "Instinct"... It is recognized that the liquid
disorder is completely related to the external factors of nature. It can
be seen that the "soft closed system" of life is the result of a
long-term internal and external environment evolution:
Hippocrates said that it is strongly required for a doctor to enter
a city to first pay attention to the direction of the city, soil, climate,
wind direction, water source, water, eating habits, lifestyle, etc... The
natural environment closely related to human health and disease.
Thomas VIII: "But any idea that life on Earth is fragile is a human
illusion." In fact, life on Earth is the toughest membrane imaginable in
the universe, it ignores odds and cannot let death pass through. We
are the weak part of the membrane, as short and fragile as cilia.
Moreover, man has long invented an existence which he thinks makes
him superior to other beings. For thousands of years, people have
been racking their brains, imagining things exclusively. Because it was
an illusion, it did not satisfy him today as it had in the past. Man is
rooted in nature." -- Lewis, member of the American Academy of
Sciences. Thomas Thomas identified the Earth's "membrane" as a
tough and soft closed system. It is similar to the ancient Greek
philosopher Plato who said in 400 BC that "the earth is a huge living
organism".
The Nine Burgess fossils push the origin of life back half a billion
years or more from the fossil imprint of modern man to Darwin's
nightmare
In August 1909, Canadian geologist Wilcutt and his family went
on a field trip to Mount Burgess in the Canadian Rockies. On the way
back, a rock tripped his wife's mount, and Wilcutt picked up the
monster that had nearly hurt her, and upon closer examination, found
a fossil containing a mollusc -- thus stumbling upon a group of
Mid-Cambrian trilobites and molluscs like worms; History says:
"Cambrian life explosion"!
The Canadian Burgess Biota, located in British Columbia, Canada,
is about 505 million years ago in the Middle Cambrian era, about 119
genera and 140 species of Marine animals, arthropods have beenfound to dominate the population. Then there are the soft-bodied
deep-sea fauna of sponges, worms, brachiopods, echinoderms,
chordates and so on - and so Wilcutt pushes the origin of life back half
a billion years or more.
Such "soft-bodied deep-sea fossils of sponges, worms,
brachiopods, echinoderms, chordates, etc." are irrefutable proof that
the "soft closed system" of life must have been associated with the
Big Bang 500 million years before Hippocrates' humorships...
The Burgess biofossils, discovered in 1909, are an irrefutable
reality of the "soft closed system" of life in ancient Greece. Here, the
exact time band of the Big Bang timeline is missing... But it also
became Darwin's nightmare!
Ten modern soils formed microbial "soft closed systems" with 3.7
billion years of life properties still
It lacks the exact time band of the Big Bang timeline
From Carson's expression of soil formation, we can see the "soft
closed system" life attribute of microorganisms in 3.7 billion years.
Carson said, "The thin layer that covers the continent like a patch
controls the survival of us humans and the various animals on the
land." Land plants, as we know, cannot grow without soil; And
without plants, animals could not live.
If our agriculture-based life still depends on the soil, it is equally
true that the soil depends on life; The origin of soil itself and the
natural characteristics it maintains are closely related to living animals
and plants. For soil is, in part, a creation of life, born of strange
interactions between living and non-living things long ago. When
volcanoes erupt hot streams of rock, when water rushing over the
bare rocks of the land wears away even the hardest granite; When
frost splits and breaks up the rock, the original soil forming material
begins to accumulate. Then the creatures began their strange
creations, turning the inanimate matter into soil, little by little. The
rock's first coverings, lichens, use their acidic secretions to promote
the weathering of the granite, creating habitats for other life. Mosses
persist in tiny interstices of pristine soil made up of the debris of
lichens, the shells of tiny insects, and the fragments of a range of
animals that originated in the sea.Life creates the soil, and unusually
rich and colorful life substances also live in the soil, otherwise, the soil
would become a dead and barren thing, it is because of the existenceand activities of countless organisms in the soil, so that the soil can
give the earth a green coat.
Soil is in a never-ending cycle, which keeps it in a constant state
of change. When rocks are weathered, when organic matter decays,
when nitrogen and other gases fall from the sky with rain, new
substances are introduced into the soil. At the same time, other
substances are removed from the soil, borrowed by living things for
temporary use, and subtle and very important chemical changes are
constantly taking place in the process by which elements from the air
and water are transformed into forms suitable for use by plants. In all
these changes, living organisms are always active participants."
This passage is almost the most beautiful hymn to the soil!
There are no academic terms or chemical equations;
Here, there is no academic discussion of geological change;
Here, there is no analysis of the precious memory of soil
cultivation by bacteria and insects and mollusks...
But here, the ancient 3.7 billion years of soil and microorganisms
to the formation of soil, all the evolutionary history of each other are
summarized and described clearly! ...
Isn't it? "No study is more puzzling, and easier to ignore, than
the question of the vast number of organisms living in the dark soil."
We also know a little bit about the extent to which soil organisms
contract with each other and the extent to which soil organisms are
constrained by the subsurface environment and the above-ground
environment." -- Carson
The Burgess biota of Canada in 1909, the Chengjiang biota of
Yunnan Province in China and the Kaili biota of Guizhou Province in
2003 constitute three major shale biota in the world, providing
evidence for the explosion of life in the geological history of the
Cambrian period: About 542 million years ago to 530 million years ago,
which is considered to be the beginning of the Cambrian period in
geology, the "Cambrian explosion" in which a large number of
invertebrate fossils suddenly appeared in the Cambrian strata over a
period of more than 20 million years has completely fixed the "soft
closed system" of life in 500 million years ago. The Cambrian period is
the period when modern life began to appear and develop on Earth in
the universe - that is, modern science only proves that soil contains
billions to hundreds of billions of bacteria per gram (desert containsonly 100,000 bacteria per gram). The source of bacteria in soil: one is
animal body, the other is autotrophic bacteria and detritus parasite
bacteria that naturally live in soil. The distribution of bacteria was
uneven in all soil layers: the surface contained less bacteria; The soil
from 10-20cm away from the surface contains the most bacteria. The
deeper the soil layer, the less bacteria - the formation of the soil is
longer than the "Cambrian explosion of life", soil is the origin of
microbial "soft closed system" of ancient evolution and human body
fluids, can be traced back to 3.7 billion years ago, and even with the
birth of bacteria 4 billion years!
Here we go! This is still missing the exact time band of the Big
Bang timeline!
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 137
Chapter 15
Reflection on the whole life of the Big Bang, the birth and
formation of the solar system
All things grow by the sun
"All things grow by the sun" this is the eternal proverb.
The earth revolves around the sun; The sun shines and the earth
does not change!
The ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle first thought about the
connection between sunlight and life, which is the real history of
ancient Greek civilization; No one thought: Hawking's big Bang
universe is derived in the modern universe, originated about 13.7
billion years ago a singularity, this singularity infinitely heavy infinitely
small, and later this singularity exploded, and then formed today's
universe and the sun!
Here, the key to Hawking's Big Bang theory is "singularity" and
"explosion"; A point where the density is infinite and the gross
product is infinitesimal. It exploded at this point 13.7 billion years ago,eventually forming today's universe, which is about 96 billion
light-years wide - so the sun was born in the big bang, and did the Sun
incubate the universe and Earth life? !
Here, modern science believes that microbial fossils are
witnessed in 3.7 billion years, Hawking's big Bang confirmed that the
sun was born as early as 10 billion years ago, and it shines all over the
earth;
It's too late to know about the sun and the solar system
Isn't it too late to see the sun and the solar system from the Big
Bang? !
Ptolemy's Treatise on the Greatest, written in 145 AD, was one of
the first great works to observe the sun and the solar system, giving a
detailed mathematical theory of the motions of the sun, moon and
planets. Ptolemy made his most original contribution by giving details
of the motion of each planet. The original Greek title of the Treatise
was The Mathematical Compilation, which was soon replaced by
another Greek title, meaning the Greatest Compilation, and when
translated from Arabic into Latin, it was given the title of the Treatise.
Ptolemy's theorem states that the sum of the product of two
pairs of opposite sides of an inner convex quadrilateral of a circle is
equal to the product of two diagonal lines.
In an inner quadrilateral of a circle, the area of the rectangles
covered by two diagonals is equal to the sum of the area of the
rectangles covered by one set of opposite sides and the area of the
rectangles covered by the other set of opposite sides.
From this theorem can be derived from the sine, cosine and a
series of trigonometric identities, Ptolemy's theorem is essentially
about the basic property of colarity, the earliest observed date is
March 26, 127 AD, the latest date is February 2, 141.
After ancient Greece, until 1453 after 1308, Copernicus
published his Treatise on the Operation of the Celestial Bodies, which
ended the papacy's 5000-year rule of "geocentric theory" and began a
new era of "heliocentric theory" of astronomy. In accordance with the
It was confirmed that the Ptolemaic solar System has nine
planets. Copernicus rows from nearest to farthest from the sun
In order, they are Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn,
Uranus, Pluto, Neptune; On August 24, 2006, Pluto was designated a"dwarf planet", which changed the nine planets of Copernicus to the
eight planets of the Solar System. However, even if modern people
kick Pluto out of the nine planets, the solar system will still operate in
the position of its own nine planets without any change! -- Modern
people gild the lily!
Kant was the first to predict that nature really had "a magical
power to transform itself from chaos into a perfect cosmic system."
The nebular hypothesis is used to explain the formation of the
universe, which constitutes the eternity and harmony of nature,
universe, life and everything.
The specific data of the eight planets of modern humans are as
follows:
Three modern scientists say the sun was born
Modern scientists say, The birth of the sun has been about 5
billion years, so theoretically the sun's light has been running in the
universe for 5 billion years, so the outward expansion of at least 5
billion light years, but considering the role of cosmic expansion, The
actual distance of the sun is even further - because of the 3000 year
papal system of "cosmic creation" until Copernicus's "Astrology", it
was only with the cruel fire of Bruno's Square of flowers that all
mankind was awakened!
In 1755, German philosopher Immanuel Kant wrote an
Introduction to the History of the Development of the Universe,
which boldly denied the creationism of the origin of the universe.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 139
Kant said in the Introduction to the Development of the Universe:
"The matter that makes up the planets of our solar system is the most
In the beginning, they broke down into elementary particles that
filled the entire universe. ... These particles have the basic power to
make them move with each other, and they are themselves a source
of vitality. In this case, matter immediately tries to form itself. A dense,
dispersed type of particle that pulls less dense matter together by
gravity from the surrounding region of the sky. But they themselves,
together with the matter they collect, gather where the denserparticles are. In the same way, all of this accumulates to the Earth,
where the particle density is even greater, and continues to do so
until clumps of objects are formed. At the same time, the repulsive
force causes the condensed mass to rotate." ... "Particles falling
toward the center of gravity, by repulsive force, will be promiscuously
deflected sideways from their linear motion, so that the vertical
motion of fall becomes a circular motion around the center of fall"
-rotational motion, gradually concentrated toward a plane
perpendicular to its axis of rotation. This description of a regular
celestial system, eventually shaped into a disc-like structure of planets
orbiting the sun, created the theory of cosmic celestial formation, and
for the first time in history was freed from theological confinement.
But ah! The 5 billion year Big Bang timeline is too short...
Four modern scientists say the sun was born
Forty-one years later, in 1796, the French mathematician Laplace
independently proposed the nebular hypothesis. Laplace believed
that the solar system formed as a nebula of hot gas cooled and
contracted. The primordial, glowing cloud was spherical, much larger
in diameter than the solar system is today, slowly spinning, gradually
cooling and contracting, shrinking in size and rapidly spinning faster,
resulting in the greatest centrifugal force near the equator and
flattening the nebula. Pressure on the equatorial edge of the gas
material separated, forming a rotating gas ring, this process over and
over again to form another rotating gas ring, eventually forming the
"Laplace ring"; The central part of the nebula eventually forms the
sun.
As they circle the Sun, the rings gradually gather to form the nine
planets of the solar system. Each planet also has its own rotating ring
forming a satellite.
Laplace described the rings of Saturn as being made up of many
particles that had not yet assembled into moons.
Laplace's hypothesis can explain the characteristics of the
planets' orbits and the composition of the sun and planets; It is
believed that the consistency of the elements that make up the
moons can also explain the origin of the angular momentum of the
solar system.
But it doesn't explain the distribution of angular momentum. In
addition, it is caused by attraction. As the nebula shrinks, itstemperature rises rather than falls.
Abstracts from a Brief History of Astronomy
The defect is still that the Big Bang timeline of the formation of
the universe in 5 billion years is too short too short...
Five modern scientists say the sun was born
In 1945, the German physicist Weizzak proposed the theory of
spiral sun formation. Weizak believed that the elliptical orbits of
particles at the same distance from the Sun in the nebula disk had
different eccentricities, so there would be vortices in the disk. The
arrangement of vortices is very regular: the disk is divided into several
concentric rings, the wider the outer ring, each
With the same number of vortices in each ring, Weizzak
estimated the number to be five. The direction of rotation of matter
in a vortex
It's the opposite direction of revolution. Between the three
vortices facing the two rings, there will be secondary vortices, these
secondary vortices rotate in the same direction as the direction of the
revolution, and planets are formed in such secondary vortices, so the
planet has a positive rotation. By choosing the right initial conditions,
the theory can explain not only the orbits and rotations of the planets,
but also the distances between them.
Abstracts from a Brief History of Astronomy
What is missing is that the universe formed without the color of
the Big Bang timeline, the universe formed the big Bang
The explosion timeline is too short too short...
Scientists say the sun was born
Hoyle's hypothesis attempts to explain the problem of angular
momentum. According to his scheme, the massive, slowly rotating
solar nebula collapsed under gravity until an unstable proto-sun
formed and collapsed. Around the protosun, the nebular material is
distributed in a ring. The gaseous material in the ring condensed,
some of the angular momentum of the protosun was transferred to
the ring of magnetically ionized gas, and the absorption of cosmic
dust particles added mass to the forming planet. Near the proto-sun,
however, the lighter elements are driven away by increasing radiation.
The result is two different types of planets: Earth-like planets close to
the Sun and Jupiter-like planets farther away.Abstracts from a Brief History of Astronomy
This is a further distillation of the nebula hypothesis proposed by
German Immanuel Kant in 1724, which still does not have the color of
the Big Bang.
Seven modern scientists say the sun was born
In 1942, Swedish astrophysicist H. Alfven proposed his nebular
hypothesis. He believed that the sun formed first, and that the
planets and moons formed from diffuse matter that fell from afar to
the vicinity of the sun
Yes. At first these materials are hot and ionized, and they are
affected by the sun's magnetic field and the stars.
The international magnetic field is maintained at a space of
several thousand astronomical units (astronomical units is the
average distance between the sun and the Earth) from the sun, and
later, due to cooling, it changes from an ionized state to a neutral
state and falls toward the Sun. The falling material collides with each
other and is continuously accelerated, and when its kinetic energy
increases to a certain level, it re-ionizes, stops falling, and forms
several clouds near the Sun. Planets and moons gradually formed in
the cloud. In addition, the magnetic field line of the sun's magnetic
field rotates with the sun's rotation, so that the ionized particles in
the cloud rotate with it, and the neutral particles in the cloud are also
dragged by the ionized matter, which means that the sun transfers
part of its angular momentum to the cloud through the magnetic field,
so the planet has a large angular momentum.
Abstracts from a Brief History of Astronomy
In 1942, Swedish astrophysicist H. Alfven proposed his own
nebular hypothesis
It didn't merge with the Big Bang; However, the breakthrough of
the theory of "the sun formed first" is commendable. Summary of this
chapter
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 141
Ptolemy's Treatise on the Greatest in AD 145 is the earliest
observation of the Sun and the solar system since
1308 years later, in 1453, Copernicus "Celestial Operation
Theory" was born, began modern scientists to observe the universe,the Earth solar system, 1755 German philosopher Immanuel Kant
completed "Introduction to the Development of the Development of
the Universe" proposed the first "nebula hypothesis", 1796, The
French mathematician Laplace independently proposed the nebular
hypothesis, a precursor to the "Laplace ring" of the solar system; In
1945, the German physicist Weizzak proposed the theory of spiral
solar formation, followed by Hoyle's hypothesis, that the slow
rotation of the massive solar nebula, under the action of gravity,
collapse until an unstable prosun formed after the collapse of the end,
recognized the "sun formed first"; In 1942, Swedish astrophysicist H.
Alfven proposed his nebular hypothesis. He believes that the sun
formed first, and the planets and satellite stars are formed by the
diffuse matter that falls to the sun near the distance - these scientists'
research results are difficult to be valuable, and they have contributed
to the preparation of the Big Bang!
Eight SUNS The solar system was born and formed and the
universe as a whole in the Big BangAfter completing The Blood
Movement Theory, Harvey proudly said, "Ah! There are heavenly
movements on earth! Praise!
The sun in my heart..."
In 400 BC, the ancient Greek science giant Plato predicted:
"The Earth is a big living organism!"
2400 years later, it was proved by the British scientist Sergei
Lavrov's scientific experiment "Gaia hypothesis"; The hypothesis was
proposed by the British atmospheric scientist James E. Lovelock in the
late 1960s, and later advanced with the American biologist Lynn
Margulis to prove Plato's great prediction that "the Earth is one giant
living organism"! -- It reveals the wholeness of life and the interaction
between life and the environment, maintaining the sustainable
survival of life on earth from beginning to end, and caring for the
sustainable survival and development of life on Earth. The theory of
Copernicus, Harvey, and Lavrov goes all the way back to eternity, until
Plato in ancient Greece predicted that "the earth is one great living
organism!" This formed the prototype of the theory of the whole life
of the cosmic Earth!
The birth and formation of the solar System and the Big Bang of
the universe
Previously, we briefly described the hypothesis of the formationof the sun and the solar system by Kant, Laplace, Weizalco, Hoyle, and
Alvin in a Brief History of Astronomy, and the solar system theory was
born between 1755 and 1942
For 187 years; The hypothesis is that the solar system was born
and formed in 4.6 or 5 billion years
The room is too short!
Here, the solar system was born out of primordial nebula matter;
Where did the primordial clusters come from? When was it born?
What substances are they? Wait -- nothing!
Rotation, compression, contraction, flattening, attraction, disk,
aggregation to form the sun, escape, capture - all unfold in the motion
of the cluster and are not too hot (200 degrees), without
thermonuclear reactions; There is no universe
The connection between the life space field and the Big Bang
Singularity and multiple cosmic systems! ...
The lack of the sun, the solar system, the universe and the
"interaction" of all things on earth makes the objective world of the
big universe system form an organic whole of life, and is in constant
movement and change and development, to perfection.
Hertog said, "This explains how the expansion of the universe
began." The expansion of the early universe solves some major
puzzles, such as why the universe was large and uniform, rather than
perfectly uniform.
"The answer to inflation is that the reason for the near
uniformity is the quantum fluctuations of inflation in the early
universe."
"Today, we can still see signs of these expansive fluctuations,
emerging in the afterglow of the Big Bang
There is a tiny change, the cosmic microwave background, which
was emitted when the universe was only 380,000 years old." Halt! ...
Here, "the universe was only issued when 380,000 years ago"
and the "cosmic microwave background" is only a conjecture of
modern scientists, and the timeline of the big Bang is too big and too
big!
Look at the singularity and explosion of life in the universe
If the Earth is located at a point some distance from the center of
a given circle, the "opposite point" is the mirror image of the Earth'sposition, on the other side of the center of the circle, and the point is
at the same distance from the center of the circle as the center of the
circle is from the Earth, and then he uses this point to define the
motion on the circle, and the points on the circle do not move at a
constant speed, but at a variable speed. The law of velocity change is
such that an observation at the "opposite point" appears to be in
uniform motion. Thus, the setting of the "opposite point" is an affront
to the ancient Greek principle that the motions of celestial bodies
must be uniform and circular. But it is clear that Ptolemy was more
concerned with the precise prediction of planetary positions and
mathematical convenience than with the question of truth. The magic
is that the "point of opposition" appeared in 1628, Harvey referred to
the Copernicus "big universe system", discovered the theory of
human blood movement, and created a "small universe system" - the
heart (viscera) is the sun in our hearts!
The heart (viscera) is the sun of the small cosmic system;
So how did the heart sun come into being?
Heart! Originated from the singularity of human life - sperm and
egg fertilized at a "singularity" in the womb, giving birth to a fertilized
egg, at which time the heart (viscera) is already inside; Because
according to the genetic code of human life, the "small universe
system" gradually forms and synchronously generates with the viscera
of the body and gradually grows up; The "expansion" time is about
ten months; After 10 months of gestation, the fetus is delivered, falls
to the ground, and becomes a baby - that is, the small cosmic system
is expanded from the singularity (the big Bang) of the instructions of
the genetic code of life to the trillions of cells in the "interaction" of
the blood flow process
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 143
To complete the heart and viscera, bones and muscles, body and
fur of the whole "swell, wave" to form a baby.
Trillions of egg cells swell and grow "large and unified" organisms
with genetic information related; The heart is equivalent to the "small
universe system" of the sun, the viscera, bones and muscles, body fur
is equivalent to the "small universe system" of the solar system! A
fertilized egg in the womb is equivalent to the "singularity" of thesmall universe system, and the growth and development process of
the cells is equivalent to the "small universe system" and the "point"
of life.
Here, the genetic code of life is hidden in the big Bang of life
from beginning to end, invisible "genetic factors" all-weather
instruction information! ...
The birth of the universe in the eleven major and small universe
systems all exist and form "singularities and explosions".
Hawking's miracle is Hawking's Big Bang theory. Hawking
proposed that the present universe began about 13.7 billion years ago
with a singularity that was infinitely heavy and infinitely small; The
singularity exploded, expanded, heated, expanded, and cooled over
billions of years to form the universe we know today!
The two key points of Hawking's Big Bang theory, one is the
singularity, one is the explosion - and the existence of life in a small
universe system "singularity" and "explosion" is very similar; The
difference is the Big Bang "singularity," which in Hawking's theory is a
point with infinitely large density and infinitely small volume. Then
the spot exploded and gradually formed the universe as it is today,
about 96 billion light years across.
The Big "bang" of the universe has a critical value - the "critical
value" equivalent to the "point" of life, the "big bang" in the human
womb, a "singularity" like the accidental occurrence of a "0".
In other words, the common denominator of the birth of
universes in large and small cosmological systems is that this
singularity has a volume, and this volume is infinitely small, so small
that it is infinitely close to the critical value of zero. Are invisible to the
human eye, and there is a huge amount of life information from the
beginning to the end - "singularity", "explosion", "critical value"...
Here's another key: "inflation" :
The small universe system is trillions and trillions of cells
expanding;
The big universe system is an expansion of everything, and the
small universe system is an all-round expansion of life... Twelve Brief
histories of the Big Bang theory
According to The Big Bang Theory, the universe was formed from
a dense, hot singularity that expanded after a big Bang 13.7 billion
years ago.In 1927, Belgian astronomer and cosmologist Georges Lemaitre
first proposed the Big Bang hypothesis.
In 1929, the American astronomer Hubble proposed the Hubble
Law that the redshift of galaxies is proportional to the distance
between galaxies, and derived the theory of cosmic expansion in
which galaxies are moving away from each other. The theory is that
the universe had a history of evolution from hot to cold. During this
period, the cosmic system is constantly expanding, so that the density
of matter from dense to sparse evolution, like a huge explosion. One
of the founders of this theory was Gamow.
In 1946, the American physicist Gamow formally proposed the
Big Bang theory, which believes that the universe was formed by a big
bang that occurred about 14 billion years ago. At the end of the last
century, observations of Ia supernovae showed that the universe was
Accelerating expansion because the universe is probably made
up mostly of dark energy.
10 days before his death in 2018 (he died on March 14), Hawking
and Hertog published an article titled "Smooth Exit from the Eternal
Expansion of the Universe." Hertog stressed: "This explains how the
expansion of the universe began. The expansion of the early universe
solved some major puzzles, such as why the universe was large and
uniform, rather than completely uniform.
"The answer to inflation is that the reason for the near
uniformity is the quantum fluctuations of inflation in the early
universe."
"We can still see signs of these inflationary fluctuations today,
with tiny variations in the afterglow of the Big Bang - the cosmic
microwave background, which was emitted when the universe was
only 380,000 years old." So, instead of being four billion years old, the
solar system would have been born and formed in the "cosmic
microwave background, when the universe was only 380,000 years
old." That is to say, it was born about 380,000 years after the Big
Bang!
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 145
Chapter 16 "Ecological Entropy" The Origin of the Force and thewhole Science of Life!
A light and life
The solar system was born about 10 billion years after the Big
Bang!
Why, then, did modern scientists only deliver his famous speech
"Light and Life" at the International Conference on Radiation Therapy
in Copenhagen in 1932, more than 2,600 years after the miracle of
ancient Greek civilization disappeared? ! This is the historical
necessity and the origin of modern science revealed in Schrodinger's
Nature and Greek Science and Humanism!
By philosophically thinking about the uncertainty principle
proposed by Heisenberg, it is pointed out that the uncertainty
principle should be extended to the understanding of life
phenomena! ... In June 1962, Bohr once again made a speech on Light
and Life at the opening ceremony of the Institute of Experimental
Genetics in Cologne - it can be seen that modern scientists study
"light and life" 4532 years later than the Greeks! ...
This is the reason why human beings were born and the
development of intelligence was later than the evolution of all things
in the universe and on Earth.
In his ReTreatise on Light and Life, Bohr further emphasized that
"we have witnessed such extraordinary progress in this century." Of
course, the temperature in the body which can be considered
practically uniform reduces the requirement of thermodynamics to a
fixed or steadily decreasing free energy. It seems to be assumed,
therefore, that the formation of all macromolecular structures,
permanent or temporary, represents essentially irreversible processes
which increase the stability of the organism under favourable
conditions maintained by nourishment and inhalation. Of course,
photosynthesis in plants, as Britten and Gamow have recently
discussed, is accompanied by an overall entropy increase." Thus,
photosynthesis and "entropy" have become the frontiers of the origin
of modern life science!
Second, from the Big Bang timeline of modern scientists on the
nature of photosynthesis and plant life
It was even later
In 1773, the Geneva scholar Johann Chenebe had alreadydiscovered photosynthesis. He set up a variety of bonsai plants and
plants in his small study room, and installed several glass tubes in the
basin, you can see the fresh branches of plants submerged in water.
Once he casually used a small glass tube to blow air into the water,
there was a wonderful scene: He saw that the plants around the twig
covered with small silver bubbles, dense, Chennebe collected these
small bubbles into a small bottle, with a smoking fire contact with the
collected gas, immediately burst into a spark burning, thus proving
that the gas produced around the plant twig can burn oxygen. What
Cheneibe blew into his mouth was carbon dioxide, thus proving that
plants breathe in carbon dioxide and exhale oxygen, and humans have
since learned the importance of photosynthesis to life.
In 1946, American chemist Melvin Calvin demonstrated the main
role of carbon fixation in photosynthesis
The Calvin-Mussen reaction was discovered. Calvin uses
radiocarbon 14 as food in the flask
At different intervals of the final break, more and more
radiocarbon was observed in the pause time, which indicates the
carbon uptake by the chlorella virescens.
In fact, photosynthesis is not as simple as Chenebe realized. The
essence is that the chlorophyll molecules in the plant cells capture the
sun's photons. The chlorophyll molecules are embedded in the cell
membrane, and when viewed under an electron microscope, you can
see that they are stacked in a crystalline order. Grab a magnesium
atom on its nitrogen claw; Attached to the ring by a long tail of carbon
chains, the molecule is modelled to a photon of a yellow-red
wavelength -- the peak wavelength of sunlight energy -- that causes
the magnesium atom to release an electron, which is immediately
loaded onto the belt by the first of a series of cytochrome, porphyrins
that hold iron in their claws. They transfer electrons without losing
energy to the location of the raw material with chloroplasts and the
appropriate enzymes and coenzymes. Each electron here uses its
energy to form a chemical bond. In the reaction that takes place
under sunlight, energy is first used to make ATP molecules. Then in
the dark, the cyclic reaction transforms the energy of ATP into the
more stable bond energy in sugar and glucose. This is the material
used to make many cells, and is also the raw material for the requiredenergy source - a complex process of formation and transformation of
a three-dimensional "soft closed system" ATP "ecological
entropy".Scientists have shown that the light reaction can convert 75
percent of the photon energy that strikes the chlorophyll molecules
into chemical energy in the ATP bond, which is twice the rate of
converting fossil fuels into electricity through the prime mover of the
central power station. It can be seen that the efficiency of
chlorophyllin using light energy is far beyond people's imagination,
and it is impossible to achieve human wisdom.
From the perspective of planetary ecology, the chlorophyll in the
green plant cells covering the entire Earth quietly converts light
energy into biological energy, which is the initial point of the energy
cycle of Taiji, and its extensive and high rate of energy conversion also
carries the cycle of oxygen and carbon dioxide! It can be seen that the
dedication of green plants is selfless, the energy product of
chlorophyll is not only the use of light energy, its most final result is to
produce carbon with scarce air content, so that the carbon content of
plants reaches more than 40%, and provides the necessary food,
nutrition and energy for the existence and reproduction of animals. It
can be seen that plants play an irreplaceable and important role in
the chain of life on Earth, which naturally leads to the emergence of
plants before animals on Earth.
The nature of the three Lights and etheric quantum properties
"If there are no plants that can use solar energy to produce the
basic food necessary for human survival, human beings cannot
survive." -- Carson
Modern scientists believe that the earliest evidence of
photosynthesis in plants on Earth is about 3.5 billion years ago.
In 1980, Shope found bacterial evidence of photosynthesis in
ancient sedimentary rocks near a desert hotspot called the "Arctic" in
the northwest desert of Australia. In the sedimentary rocks, countless
photosynthetic blue cells create mat-like layers of thin silk. Fossil
evidence leads us to admit that in 35
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 147
Living cells have been living in air and water for hundreds of
millions of years, or more (10 billion years or so),Carrying out photosynthesis, carrying out the two major cycles of
carbon and oxygen, carrying out the energy cycle of the Earth...
Then what is the nature of light? ?
Newton's Optics proposed the bending of light as early as 1704
Spectrum is Newton on Trinity College in 1665 London Great
plague holiday, returned home in January 1666, put forward the color
theory, found the theory of refraction, seven colors of light - Newton
used a prism to decompose sunlight into a color spectrum, and did
the color light mixing experiment. Newton created the Newton color
disk to explain the composition of daylight. The round plate is divided
into seven fan sections, which are successively painted with seven
colors: red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo and violet. Rotate the
round plate quickly, and the plate is white, indicating that daylight is
composed of the above seven colors of light.
And because Newton put forward the "particle theory" was
opposed by the authority Hooke, until 1703 Hooke's long death. It
was only the following year that Newton had the opportunity to
publish his masterpiece.
The full name of Newton's Optics is "Optics or Reflections,
refractions, bending and Color of Light" (that is, the bending of light
was first proposed by Newton's Optics, not Einstein's patent!).
Newton wrote in the preface to Optics:
Newton said: "In order to avoid a frivolous dispute over these
arguments, I have delayed the public release of the book, and
probably for some time, without the urging of my friends."
The nature of light was determined in Newton Optics in 1704 as
the "particle theory" of light, and its essence is the quantum theory.
But scientists have long ignored it. It wasn't until 1900 that Planck put
things right that mainstream science recognized... This was 300 years
later; It was only from the Newtonian spectrum and the Da Vinci
"visual image subject" that human scientists confirmed the strict
wavelength range limit of "visible light" (the human eye can only see
"visible light") :
[1, red light: wavelength range: 760~622 nm;
2, orange light: wavelength range: 622~597 nm;
3, yellow light: wavelength range: 597~577 nm;
4, green light: wavelength range: 577~492 nm;
5, green light: wavelength range: 492~450 nm;6, blue light: wavelength range: 450~435 nm;
7, purple light: wavelength range: 435~390 nm;
The Big Bang expresses that the nature of light is that
"electromagnetic waves" are quantum (" 1011 seconds (104 years)
after the Big Bang, the temperature is about 105 Kelvin, the matter
period." In the early history of the universe, light dominated the
energy patterns." Visible light is the part of the electromagnetic
spectrum that the human eye can perceive, and the visible spectrum
has no precise range; The average human eye can perceive the
wavelength of electromagnetic waves between 400 and 760nm, but
some people can perceive the wavelength of electromagnetic waves
between about 380 and 780nm.
148 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
Four Light particles and wave sources reveal 'quantum
entanglement'
From Newton's Optica, the prism dispersion "spectrum" and the
speed of light, which are common properties of the natural universe,
have been traced back to the limit of visible light. Looking back today,
in fact, Planck used Maxwell's equations to integrate the work of
previous historical scientists. At that time, the Rayleigh-Kings formula
reached a conclusion that was contrary to the experimental results of
the blackbody radiation spectrum in short wave, and the Wien
formula only applied to the short-wave part of the energy distribution
of the blackbody radiation spectrum. This reverse learning shows that
it is necessary to find a blackbody radiation formula that can
successfully describe the entire experimental curve. By deeply
thinking about Planck, when the blackbody is heated at a
temperature of more than 2800 degrees, an abnormal phenomenon
occurs and electromagnetic waves are emitted from the small hole to
cut in, and repeated experiments are made and two hypotheses are
accidentally born. Even Planck himself did not think that he had
created a miracle of the century that completely changed the
traditional physics.
According to "1011 seconds after the Big Bang (10.4 billion years),
the temperature was about 105 Kelvin, the matter period." In theearly history of the universe, light dominated all forms of energy." The
quantum mechanics discovered by modern scientists was born after
the Big Bang (1011 seconds (10.4 billion years), and there is naturally
a mysterious hidden secret of "quantum entanglement"!
Light and soil formed 10.4 billion to 300,000 years after the Big
Bang
"1011 seconds (10.4 billion years) after the Big Bang, the
temperature was about 105 Kelvin, the matter period. In the early
history of the universe, light dominated all forms of energy." - that is,
14.3 billion years ago, 10.4 billion years ago, "light dominated all
forms of energy"; Soil formation is closely related to light and is
indeed a long historical process of cosmic evolution.
In view of the fact that "300,000 years after the big bang: about
3000 degrees, the chemical combination causes the formation of
neutral atoms", the surface rocks are first exposed, and the essential
changes occur under the action of light, wind, rain, freezing and the
cooling of the universe, forming mineral particles of different sizes
and shapes, which we call "soil parent material". rock
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 149
Weathering is the parent material, which provides conditions for
the growth of lower organisms. Soil forming parent material is further
in the natural soil forming factor
Under the action of biology, climate, terrain and time, various
nutrients are gradually released and accumulated, and natural soil is
gradually formed...
Six explosions Soil and life complement each other Creation and
human agricultural artificial selection gradually emerge
Now formed
Carson's description of the soil is very beautiful and very relaxed
and romantic. "The thin layer that covers the continents like a patch
controls the survival of us humans and the various animals on the
land," she said. Land plants, as we know, cannot grow without soil;
And without plants, animals can't live.
If our agriculture-based life still depends on the soil, it is equally
true that the soil depends on life; The origin of soil itself and the
natural characteristics it maintains are closely related to living animalsand plants. For soil is, in part, a creation of life, born of strange
interactions between living and non-living things long ago. When
volcanoes erupt hot streams of rock, when water rushing over the
bare rocks of the land wears away even the hardest granite; When
frost splits and breaks up the rock, the original soil forming material
begins to accumulate. Then the creatures began their strange
creations, turning the inanimate matter into soil, little by little. The
rock's first coverings, lichens, use their acidic secretions to promote
the weathering of the granite, creating habitats for other life. Mosses
persist in tiny interstices of pristine soil made up of the debris of
lichens, the shells of tiny insects, and the fragments of a range of
animals that originated in the sea.
Life (bacteria) creates the soil, and unusually rich and colorful life
substances also live in the soil, otherwise, the soil would become a
dead and barren thing, it is because of the existence and activities of
countless organisms in the soil, so that the soil can give the earth a
green coat.
Soil is in a never-ending cycle, which keeps it in a constant state
of change. When rocks are weathered, when organic matter decays,
when nitrogen and other gases fall from the sky with rain, new
substances are introduced into the soil. At the same time, other
substances are removed from the soil, borrowed by living things for
temporary use, and subtle and very important chemical changes are
constantly taking place in the process by which elements from the air
and water are transformed into forms suitable for use by plants. In all
these changes, living organisms are always active participants."
This in-depth description of soil life is almost the most beautiful
hymn to soil! There are no academic terms or chemical equations;
Here, there is no academic discussion of geological change; Here,
there is no analysis of bacteria and insects, of soil cultivation... But
here, all this has been covered, and this is really the most beautiful
expression of soil ecology! Yeah! "There are few studies more puzzling,
and at the same time more overlooked, than the question of the vast
number of organisms living in the dark soil. We also know a little bit
about how soil organisms are conditioned on each other and how soil
organisms are conditioned on the subsurface environment and the
above-ground environment."Carson has the rigor to respect the facts and the fearless courage
to challenge the stereotypes, which makes us deeply
Recognize the characteristics of soil:
First, the soil is the foundation of living things, and the five
realms of life cannot leave the soil.
Second, life exists in the soil, and life interacts with the soil, so
that the soil can live with vitality.
Third, the soil comes from the long weathering of rocks, and the
soil fertility is the selfless dedication of organisms. Microbes and
insects toil beneath the earth.
4. For the subtlety of micro-ecological details and the
micro-ecology of soil... We still "only know a little bit"!
Let us express our sorrow and regret for the early death of
Marine biologist Carson with infinite affection! ...
Seven Carson studies prove that the prehistoric existence of
microbes coincides with soil formation and mysterious origins
Modern scientists and geologists believe that the fossil-gate
microbes were born 4 billion years ago!
Carson paints a very detailed picture of the close relationship
between microbes, soil and the Big Bang, saying:
"Bacteria, fungi and algae reduce the remains of animals and
plants to the inorganic substances of which they are composed.
Without these tiny organisms, the vast circulation of chemical
elements like carbon and oxygen through soil, air, and biological
tissue would not be possible. Without nitrogen-fixing bacteria, for
example, plants would struggle to get nitrogen, even if they were
surrounded by a "sea" of nitrogen-containing air. Other organisms
produce carbon dioxide and form carbonic acid, which promotes the
decomposition of rocks. "There are other microorganisms in the soil
that are contributing to various REDOX reactions that transfer
minerals such as iron, manganese and sulfur into a state that plants
can absorb." ...
"Also present in surprising numbers are tiny mites and primitive
wingless insects called salicyces. Small as they are, they play an
important role in removing dead leaves and in slowly converting
debris from the forest floor into soil. The characteristics that some of
these little creatures have in accomplishing their tasks are almost
unbelievable.""Life in the soil includes everything from bacteria to mammals...
It fills the soil with moisture and promotes the drainage and
infiltration of water throughout the growing layer."
See?! One of the most important, according to Carson, is the
microecology of soil! - Siphoning, drainage and infiltration of water in
soil. The soil acts like a sponge, absorbing water and holding solutes.
Aye. Substances can be melted in water, a variety of chemical
substances can exist in water, atoms and ions can be widely
distributed in the tiny particles of soil, resulting in random molecular
combination and decomposition of the soil, in order to adhere to the
formless vitality of the water channel, the formation of life in the
universe of the universe. The universal nature of the Bunsen channel
is a highly effective channel hidden in the universe and invisible to
human eyes. There are atoms and ions of chemical substances in the
soil, and there are atoms and ions of chemical substances in the cells
of plant roots. Because atoms and ions are particles on small scales of
10-9 -- 10-10 meters, they can often create a magical supply of
biological elements
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 151
Chain ". In fact, any contaminant in the soil can enter the air as
the soil and water evaporate,
Enter the atmosphere of the sea and the sky, the great life field
of the universe's living beings; This is the universal force of "ecological
entropy" ubiquitous in the "whole life science" of the Big Bang; To
realize Schrodinger's "life lives on negative entropy"!
The formation of vegetation on Earth must conform to the whole
life theory of the Big Bang
The Earth is a strange planet, the only one on which life exists.
Human beings live on the earth; Humans must live on "negative
entropy" - this is food (animals and plants); According to the food
chain animals eat plants to think, plants grow on the soil, there must
be vegetation on the surface of the earth, in order to have
"photosynthesis";
So how did Earth's vegetation form?
Modern human textbooks say that "long ago there were
single-celled plants on the earth, namely fungi and algae." At this time,the plant has only one cell, and the growth and life only rely on the
nutrients in the environment, and then gradually evolve into a plant
that can be autotrophic. The evolutionary process of plants is basically
divided into the age of bacteria and algae, the age of naked jus, the
age of ferns, the age of gymnosperms, and the age of angiosperms."
So, how to explain the formation of vegetation on Earth in the
whole life science of the Big Bang? ?
Here, the textbook account of the birth of vegetation must be
revised, especially- [March 2017] "According to the Spanish
newspaper El Pais on March 1, An international team of geologists,
paleontologists and nanoscientists from London, the United States
and Norway has discovered fossils of bacteria between 3.77 billion
and 4.28 billion years old in the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in
Hudson Bay in northern Quebec, Canada, 4.5 billion years after the
birth of Earth. The fossil bacteria are considered to be the oldest
known evidence of life." Here, too, the birth of the Earth must be
corrected to a momentary "time window" of about 13 billion years -
the golden section of the time axis of the Big Bang.
The formation of vegetation on Earth must conform to the whole
life theory of the Big Bang
In 2022, the James Webb Space Telescope has captured the
existence of "gas", "sunlight" and "water" for 13.1 billion years at the
beginning of the Big Bang.
1. Gas:
Released on July 11, 2022, the Webb Space Telescope captured
images of the Southern Ring Nebula about "2,000 light-years from
Earth, showing a full view of this planetary nebula; There is also the
Stephan Quintuple galaxy in the constellation Pegasus, where the
images reveal the speed and composition of gas near the galaxy's
supermassive black hole." In other words, the universe "gas body" has
appeared in the beginning of the big Bang;
One color image of the Carina Nebula, 7,600 light-years from
Earth, "shows its earliest, rapidly forming phase." The Carina Nebula,
one of the largest and brightest nebulae in the sky, is home to many
stars much more massive than the Sun, and is a star-forming region in
the Milky Way, where newborn stars and their clusters are enveloped
in vast amounts of gas and dust. Many of the stars in this picture are
stars in the making." Revealing that "the cluster is encased in a hugeamount of gas and dust" - both images
There is a lot of "gas"! What about sunshine? ?
2. Sunshine:
The outer gas envelope of the star is thrown away at a high
speed, and the absolute luminosity revealed can exceed 10 billion
times that of the Sun. Analyzing specific types of supernova
explosions, the team of Perlmutter, Riess, and Schmidt found that
more than 50 supernovae appeared fainter than previously expected.
The explanation for this result is that the universe is expanding at an
accelerating rate - "10 billion times the brightness of the sun"! In
other words, 13.1 billion years after the Big Bang, there was
"sunlight"!
For microbial bacteria, in addition to sunlight and gas, there must
also be "water"! 3. Water:
The Webb Telescope conducted the most detailed near-infrared
transmission spectra of WASP-96 b's atmosphere with its
near-infrared Imager and NIRISS, which clearly found evidence of
water in the atmosphere.
In other words, the James Webb Space Telescope began in the
Big Bang
First captured 13.1 billion years of existence of "gas", "sunlight",
"water" exact proof! In this way, the presence of microbial bacteria in
the universe should coincide with the 13.1 billion years of the Big
Bang (perhaps within the next 10 years). More informative images
from the Webb telescope will be more fully illustrated.)
The formation of vegetation on Earth must conform to the whole
life theory of the Big Bang
We have said that there are four key "ecological entropies" for
the whole biology of the Big Bang: [There are four elements of
"ecological entropy" :
Sunshine, water, air, food.
Because the Earth is a huge living organism - Plato, since the
earth was born, the ratio of water to land has been 7:3 - the Earth is
literally a giant water balloon. Therefore, the water content of all
living organisms on Earth is in the 7:3 range; If water is not absorbed
by cells, it cannot participate in the metabolic activities of a series of
life in the human body (organism), and life ceases to exist.The James Webb Space Telescope color map clearly shows light,
water, and gas:
In this single image alone, there are thousands of galaxies. Some
of these galaxies glow as far back as 13 billion years ago.
According to scientists, the universe was born only about 13.7
billion years ago.
● Exoplanet WASP-96 b (Spectrogram)
Webb's detailed observations of the hot, expanding planet
outside our solar system revealed the presence of significant water
vapor in WASP-96 b's atmosphere.
The fluctuations recorded in the spectra also reflect the presence
of clouds and haze in the planet's atmosphere.
● Stephan Quintet Galaxy
For this very compact group of galaxies, Webb penetrated the
dust shroud surrounding the center of a galaxy,
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 153
Revealing the speed and composition of the gas near its
supermassive black hole.
These color maps from 13.7 billion years have truly reflected the
existence of the four elements of "ecological entropy" in the Big Bang,
so the big Bang and the whole life science are closely related and
inseparable in the big Bang process. "Extragalactic galaxies are
complex celestial systems whose light is the sum of the light emitted
by their constituent parts. Thus, when an extragalactic galaxy as a
whole is spectroscopic, the spectrum photographed is a superposition
of the spectra of all its orbital components. Obviously, the spectrum
of extragalactic galaxies varies depending on their composition. The
composition of an extragalactic galaxy is correlated with its type and,
therefore, the cumulative spectrum of different types is different. The
cumulative spectral type of elliptical galaxies is the latest, roughly
equivalent to type K."
"The stars in the galaxy are moving, the galaxy itself is spinning,
and the galaxy as a whole is moving through space." This proves that
the whole life science of the Big Bang is completely the mutual use of
planets and galaxies, so that the objective world of life in the universe
and earth forms an organic whole, and is in constant motion andchange!
11 Big Bang Planet Earth Universal Force "Bunsen Channel"
Through the big Bang of the universe formed the main life action
in the universe earth to carry out the exchange of cosmic microscopic
network path called Bunsen channel. Since this channel was
discovered by Bunsen, it is called "Bunsen Channel". This is the
"whole life" concept of the Big Bang.
In fact, because of the big Bang of the universe, there is a
universal network path of micro material exchange, which is an
indisputable fact. From "300,000 years after the Big Bang: about 3000
degrees, chemical bonding causes the formation of neutral atoms, the
universe is mainly composed of gaseous matter, and gradually
condensed into dense gas clouds under the action of self-gravity, until
the stars and star systems."
So, what is a Bunsen channel?
Because Robert Bunsen, a chemistry professor in Medel,
Germany, was the first to use scientific experimental methods to truly
discover a laboratory lamp - the Bunsen burner. Bunsen put salt, coal,
and metal chips on the flame, and found that each substance gave off
its own characteristic light in the combustion. Like metal sodium
forever emits a yellow flame, potassium emits a purple flame... So he
discovered a very simple, very fast method of analyzing matter;
However, because potassium salt, sodium salt, lithium salt all emit the
same yellow flame, it is impossible to distinguish. Causing Bunsen a
problem. At this time, Kirchhoff, professor of physics at Medeburg,
used the prism to analyze the nature of light, and broke down the
flame of various substances on the Bunsen burner into different
spectral characteristics, thus inventing a new instrument -
spectrometer. When the light of the Bunsen burner hits the prism of
the spectrometer, it can be seen that the chips of potassium salt,
lithium salt, and sodium salt burn in the flame, and the flame of each
substance emits a different spectrum composed of several different
color bands. For example, the spectrum of sodium contains only one
yellow line. Potassium purple flame has three: two red, one purple...
This allows spectroscopic analysis to distinguish between the various
substances and to detect the amount of sodium in 10 millionths of a
milligram. So Bunsen used this method to look at all kinds of things.
He found traces of lithium in a rock where a shrub, Bunsen, wasgrowing in a crack
Since the bush absorbs nutrients from the rock, its leaves must
contain lithium, and Bunsen burns the leaves in a lamp,
Sure enough, it emitted the characteristic spectrum of lithium
(with a very bright red line and a hazy orange line). Bunsen gave the
leaves to a cow to eat, and put the milk in the lamp flame burning,
also found the lithium spectrum; Bunsen gave the owner a cup of milk
to drink, and from a drop of the owner's blood, he saw a bright red
line and a hazy orange line next to it, proving that lithium had entered
the owner's blood. Bunsen found and proved by experiments that
there is a universal logistics channel in the universal life field in the
natural universe - the channel itself.
The Janson channel reveals a secret of nature: any material in
the universe has the ability to enter and exit any sphere of biological
individual cells, tangible species of individual life and intangible
logistics channels are always connected, which is the "channel effect"
of the cosmic energy microcycle, the logistics attribute of the cosmic
big Bang network is the secret of "life entropy" everywhere.
12 Negative Energy Entropy Cycles at the beginning of the Big
Bang - the "Taiji Cycle"
What is the entropy cycle?
The reciprocating cycle of cosmic energy (matter) in the universe,
the sun, the earth and the underground is called the Taiji energy cycle.
Short for: Taiji cycle.
There is evidence for the Big Bang: "300,000 years after the Big
Bang: about 3,000 degrees, chemical bonding worked to form neutral
atoms, and the universe was mainly composed of gaseous matter,
which gradually condensed under self-gravity into clouds of higher
density gas, until stars and star systems." - "The main composition of
the universe is gaseous matter" is the formation of "Taiji energy cycle"
logistics network is inevitable!
Ancient Greek scientists realized 2,400 years ago, when Aristotle
said that minor earthquakes are caused by winds blowing out of caves
within the Earth, while severe earthquakes are caused by strong
winds blowing into underground caves. Whether or not this
explanation is in line with modern opinion, it shows that ancient
philosophers realized that wind blows into the earth, and wind canblow out of the earth. This is the ancient Greeks simple Taiji energy
cycle.
We summarize the diagram of the Taiji cycle:
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 155
The Big Bang of the universe naturally formed the
multi-dimensional "negative energy" entropy microcycle of planetary
galaxies
The ring naturally occurs in the Taiji cycle
The Earth-Earth cycle is a natural cosmic "negative energy" effect
of the Big Bang: the energy of the sun shines on green plants through
sunlight, and the plants absorb carbon dioxide from the air and
decompose it into carbon and oxygen through chlorophyll. Carbon
chemically changes with the water in the plant, becoming
carbohydrates, remaining as nutrients for the plant itself, and oxygen
is released and returned to the air, which is photosynthesis.
There is evidence that 75% of the photon energy struck on the
chlorophyll molecules is converted in the light reaction
The chemical energy in the ATP bond is twice the rate of
converting fossil fuels into electricity through the prime mover of the
central power station, and the photochemical energy conversion
effect is very large.
Photosynthesis converts light energy into biological energy,
plants are the food of animals, and animals, plants and
microorganisms together constitute the ecological energy of the
universe. Dead animal and plant remains enter the soil, convert into
energy matrix, and enter the geological sequence by the action of
water and bacteria, deposit, form the geological niche of the earth in
the process of plate movement, enrich and form oil, gas and coal
(hydrocarbon) in the process of diagenetic movement, oil nourishes
and nourishes the geological ecology of the earth (location) and
lubricates the plate movement. As a supplement to the Earth's
internal energy, it generally exists in various sequences of rock
structures, and then leaks back to the ground with volcanoes,earthquakes, and cracks in the surface of the earth's ecological
movement, or emerges from the river network and water system, and
enters the atmosphere... To return hydrocarbons to the surface in
various forms...
In fact, much of the energy is quietly recovered by the sun. It
completes the energy cycle from the sun to the earth, and from the
earth underground to the sun in the universe - the Earth-energy cycle.
This loop, which is always reciprocating, forms an important link in
the energy cycle of the universe from eternity to the present. The
energy cycle of the earth is an indispensable part of the energy cycle
of the universe, which is the experience and the fact and proof of the
formation of the big Bang.
The Big Bang gave the solar system the same chemical
composition as the planets and galaxies
There is a prerequisite for the Earth-based energy cycle, that is,
the hydrogen, oxygen, helium, carbon, etc. that make up the universe,
planets, solar systems, and galaxies. Elements and inorganic
substances in the earth and in the Earth's atmosphere, and hydrogen,
oxygen, helium, carbon, etc. that form all living things... The elements
must be the same! Modern scientists use spectrometers to catalogue
millions of spectral lines in visible and high - and low-frequency
ultraviolet and infrared light. Spectroscopic evidence suggests that
the most distant universe is made of the same chemical elements as
Earth, but in different proportions. All living things on the earth are
also composed of the same elements, the same chemical elements of
the earth and the universe, which can be proved from the Bunsen
experiment, and every event of the exchange of matter and energy
can be expressed in a certain position in the spectrum table, which
provides the guarantee and fact of the broad recyclability of elements
for the energy cycle of the Earth.From the "Earth-energy cycle"
diagram, we can clearly see that the sun is also quietly absorbing
energy, which can be proved by many natural phenomena. For
example, the inertial force of light during radiation is pulled by the
mass of the sun, showing that the sun's gravity absorbs energy. At
ground level, the sun's white light is absorbed and radiated back out
as heat. The leaves of the plant photosynthesize at the same time, the
unabsorbed sunlight is re-emitted, the strongest of which is the green
wavelength. The atoms and molecules of leaves, flowers, pigmentsand dyes, gold and silver selectively reradiate light of certain
frequencies in the sun's light, and are perceived as the colors of the
spectrum, which are reflections of the sun's light; As well as the
siphon phenomenon of water vapor evaporation, the small drops of
water in the air...... Everything is quietly reflecting the sunlight back.
So, this is a complete Earth-energy cycle created by the Big Bang.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 157
The earliest evidence of photosynthesis on Earth was about 13.5
billion years ago.
Although in 1980, Shope found bacterial evidence of
photosynthesis in ancient sedimentary rocks near a desert hotspot in
the northwest desert of Australia, known as the "Arctic," the layers of
sedimentary rock were seen as MATS of filaments made by countless
photosynthetic blue cells. Fossil evidence leads us to believe that 10
billion years ago, or more, living cells were already living in air and
water, carrying out photocooperation, carrying out the twin cycles of
carbon and oxygen, carrying out the terrestrial energy cycle, and only
a geologically catastrophic (for life) sea and land transition could
produce a large number of fossils...
Fifteen Big Bang processes in the universe "second law of
thermodynamics" disordered dissipation or entropy
The total always increases over time
I want to speculate a little bit about the development of life in
the universe, especially intelligent life. I will include the human
species here, even though much of human behavior throughout
history has been rather foolish, with no regard for the survival of
other species. The two questions I'm going to discuss are, "What is
the probability that there is life elsewhere in the universe?" "How
might life develop in the future?"
It is a common experience that things become more chaotic and
chaotic over time. This observation even has its own law, the so-called
second law of thermodynamics. This law says that the total amount of
disorder or entropy in the universe always increases with time.
However, the law refers only to the total amount of disorder. The
order of an object can increase as long as the amount of disorder
around it increases more.That's what happens in living things. We can define life as an
ordered system that maintains its tendency to resist disorder and can
replicate itself. That is, it can make similar but independent ordered
systems. To accomplish this, the system must convert some ordered
form of energy, such as food, sunlight, or electricity, into disordered
energy in the form of heat. In this way, the system can satisfy the
requirement of an increase in the total quantity of disorder while
itself and its descendants increase in the quantity of order.
Eventually they will start to attract each other and will come
together in one big squeeze. This will be the end of the history of the
universe in real time.
We observe a remarkable feature of the universe in the
microwave background discovered by Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson.
It's essentially a kind of fossil record of what the universe looked like
when it was very young. This backview is almost the same, no matter
which direction we look. The difference between the different
directions is about 1 in 100,000. These differences are incredibly small
and need to be explained. The generally accepted explanation for this
smoothness is that very early in the history of the universe, it
underwent a period of rapid expansion, with the universe expanding
by as little as a hundred trillion trillion times. This process is called
inflation. In contrast to the inflation that afflicts us all too often,
inflation is a good thing for the universe. If that were the whole story,
microwave radiation would be exactly the same everywhere. So
where does this tiny difference come from?
Sixteen Big Bang universe follows the laws of physics NAPN
overlooking plan
NAPN chart:
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 159
At an odd, split second in 14.3 billion years, the Big Bang
occurred; 10-43 seconds after the Big Bang (Planck time) : about 1032
degrees, the universe emerged from the quantum fluctuation
background, this phase is called Planck time.
Previously, the density of the universe could have been morethan 1094 grams per cubic centimeter, more than 1078 times the
density of protons, and all the forces in physics are one.
(Supersymmetry) At this stage, the universe has cooled to the point
where gravity can be separated and begins to exist independently,
with gravitons that transmit gravitational interactions. Other forces in
the universe (strong, weak interaction and electromagnetic
interaction) are still one 】 - Modern scientists on the basis of Greek
science, continue to discover scientific results can be summarized as
NAPN diagram - looking down the center of the plan is the big Bang
"singularity", the square is the big Bang, the speed of light; The circle
is the borderless Big Bang territory; The outer multielement cycle is a
physical law of the Big Bang (1011 seconds (104 years) after the Big
Bang, the temperature is about 105 Kelvin, the matter period. In the
early history of the universe, light dominated all forms of energy. As
the universe expanded, the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation
was stretched, and the corresponding photon energy was reduced.
The radiation energy density decreases inversely with the product of
scale (R) and volume (4πR3/3), i.e. the amper1 /R4 decreases, while
the energy density of matter simply decreases inversely with volume
by 1/ R3/4. After 10,000 years, the density of matter catches up with
the radiation density and exceeds it, and from then on, the universe
and its dynamics become dominated by matter. - The first human
discovery of cosmology was Copernicus's cosmological principle in
1452, followed by Kepler's publication of the Mystery of the Universe
in 1596, which discovered the law of planetary motion (three),
restoring the ultimate truth of cosmic harmony;
In 1687, Newton put forward the law of universal gravitation in
the Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. Newton revealed
that "there is gravitation between any body"; As the Big Bang
universe "began to exist independently, there were gravitons that
transmitted gravitational interactions." Halley's calculations using the
law of gravitation confirmed that Comet Halley would appear as
scheduled in 1758, proving that it would orbit the sun every 76.1
years!
On December 14, 1900, Planck made a report "On the
Distribution of Energy in the Normal Spectrum" at the German
Physical Society, and excitedly explained his most amazing discovery:
In order to theoretically obtain the correct radiation formula, it mustbe assumed that the energy of matter radiation (or absorption) and
the famous Planck formula ε=hv, where h is Planck's constant
h=6.63×10^-34, known as Planck's constant, this result became the
birth of quantum theory and the arrival of a new era of physics
revolution;
1910 Einstein's general relativity equation E = mc2...
Here, we must also mention the Bohr electron model:
(1) Of all the mechanically possible motions of electrons around
the nucleus, only those orbital motions where the moment P of the
electron is equal to an integer multiple of the quantity n/2π are stable,
i.e. :
P=n h/2π
(2) When the electron moves on any orbit permitted by the
above hypothesis, the atom has a certain energy Wn, and does not
emit light, which is called a stable motion state.
(3) Only atoms transition from a stable motion state with a larger
Wn energy to another lower one
When the energy Wk is in steady motion, the atom emits
monochromatic light with the frequency vkn = Wn/h - Wk/h
Heisenberg, Bohr's student, cut into and applied the principle of
complementarity, found the corresponding quantities and
corresponding relations of quantum mechanics corresponding to
classical mechanics, and found and established "matrix mechanics".
In 1933, Schrodinger, influenced by Bohr's principle of
complementarity, discovered the fundamental equation of quantum
mechanics: Schrodinger's equation, which was praised for
"discovering a new form that is very useful in atomic theory".
The laws of physics that these modern great scientists have
completed for 3,000 years have appeared in the Big Bang gene code
information since the beginning of the big Bang, and have effectively
maintained the big Bang in different periods of the universe 14.3
billion years, showing that "God is indeed playing dice"!
17 Big Bang super rate energy release equation -Q-J equation
The Del genetic square array "∵= 3:1" reveals that the Fibonacci
series and Malthus's "Population" reproduction super 2N geometric
base imply the mathematical series of the Big Bang - because:
Fibonacci series 13, 21, 34, 55...... It's done by adding some naturalnumber. It's a choice. Nature does not have such an artificial natural
sequence! Such as:
3x4 two twelve; Plus one, two, 13
Sx4=20;
Plus I, two, 21
8 x4 2 32; +2, 2, 34
13x42,52; +3 two 55......
Easy equation 2n = 2, 4, 8, 16...... 2n geometric numbers cannot
produce the Big Bang and the singularity of life or sudden extinction
only W =×4n Harvey small universe system geometry in accordance
with Mendelian principles
Mathematical series, and because of the same effect of the
physical laws of the big universe system and the small universe system,
the big Bang gave birth to the whole life science, Q-J equation must
come from the big Bang era; This assertion is supported by recent
observations by Dr. Victor M. Rivilla: "Here in the center of our galaxy,
a large number of RNA precursors have been found" - [" Astrobiologist
Victor Rivilla of the Spanish National Research Council and the
Spanish National Institute of Aerospace Technology explains: "Here
we show that what happens in the interstellar medium
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 161
Chemical reactions are able to efficiently form a variety of nitrile
compounds, which are key components of the 'RNA world 'scenario
Daughter precursor. 】
"The chemical composition of G+0.693-0.027 is similar to that of
other star-forming regions in our galaxy, as well as that of solar
system objects such as comets," Rivera said. By carefully studying and
analyzing the emission signatures of G+0.693 to 0.027, Rivera and his
colleagues identified a range of nitriles, including cyanic acid, cyanene,
propyl cyanide, and propyl cyanide. They also tentatively tested
cyanoformaldehyde and acetonitrile...
"So far, we have detected the precursors of several simple
ribonucleotides, the building blocks of RNA," explains modern
astrobiologist Izaskun Jimenez-Serra, also from the Spanish National
Research Council and the National Institute of Aerospace Technology.
Hawking said: "The great mystery at the heart of the Big Bang is
to explain how an impossibly large, entire universe with space andenergy could have come out of nothing. The secret lies in one of the
strangest facts about our universe. The laws of physics require that
there is something called negative energy."
It's in the third ingredient in our cosmic recipe: It's in space. It
may sound strange, but according to the natural laws of gravity and
motion - those oldest in science - space itself is a huge storehouse of
negative energy, enough to ensure that everything adds up
Up to zero. 】 -- Stephen Hawking, Reflections on Ten Questions
The eighteen Big Bang theory of the universe is Mendel's "3:1"
mathematical square with the law of gravitation
Inverse ratio
Compare the Big Bang theory (1011 seconds (104 years) after the
Big Bang, the temperature was about 105 Kelvin, the matter period.
In the early history of the universe, light dominated all forms of
energy. As the universe expanded, the wavelength of electromagnetic
radiation was stretched, and the corresponding photon energy
decreased. The radiation energy density decreases inversely with the
product of scale (R) and volume (4π r3/4), that is, the amper1 /R4
decreases, while the energy density of matter simply decreases
inversely with volume (1/R3). Ten thousand years later, the density of
matter caught up with the density of radiation and surpassed it, and
from then on, the universe and its dynamics became dominated by
matter. It can be confirmed that the core "inverse square ratio" of
Newton's law of universal gravitation comes from the Big Bang
(radiation energy density decreases inversely with the product of
scale (R) and volume (4π r3/4), that is, the amper1 /R4 decreases,
while the energy density of matter simply decreases inversely with
volume (1/R3)).
Here, the Big Bang superrate (the energy density of matter is
simply reduced by 1/R3 in inverse proportion to the volume) shows
that the "3:1" mathematics of Mendelian genetic squares existed long
before the Big Bang and demonstrated infinite power.
The Mendelian matrix 3:1 deduces the rate of energy released in
the Big Bang
162 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
W= ×4n∵ = 3:1
∴ W = (3:1) x 4n
Expand:
W =3 x 4n: 1 x 4n
N is the natural numbers 1, 2, 3...
When N is 1, w is 12:4
When N=2, w=48:16 is 192:48, 768:192, 3072:768... They are 4
square matrices,
16 square array, etc. - Only the Big Bang can have such a rapid
and abnormal "square array" the big Bang "negative energy
warehouse" all-round release! Show W = (3:1) × 4n - the infinite
power of the Q-J equation of the Big Bang to release negative energy.
Nineteen cosmic Big Bang Force CNC evolutionary traces with
Sphinx "slimming" marks of the spider
Modern deciphering of the Silk horse Trace
In 1843, when Tsarist Russia invaded Egypt, it looted some of the
sphenoid statues, which were moved from ancient Egypt on the
equator to the Leningrad Museum at 60 degrees north latitude. After
more than a hundred years to the 1980s, a scholar came to the
Leningrad Museum, he stood in front of a Sphinx carefully and
repeatedly observed it back and forth, and sighed incredibly: "This
stone statue has become thin."
This was heard by the administrator next to very unhappy and
asked: "It is thin do you have any basis?"
It turned out that the scholar had studied the archives of the
Sphinx for a long time, and compared the records with its current
height, body width, waist circumference and neck thickness, today's
stone statue has become much smaller. So the administrator told the
secret of the stone statue: when cleaning the surface of the ground
often found some powdery dust around the stone statue, the most
serious this winter, powderA force wave. Electromagnetic waves
consist of oscillating electric and magnetic forces that travel at the
speed of light. They hit charged particles, such as electrons in a radio
or television antenna, and they shake the particles back and forth,
unpacking the information carried by the waves in the particles. This
information can then be amplified and fed to a speaker or television
screen for comprehension - the only invisible channel of knowledge
and communication between humans and the distant universe."In this way, we put the Sphinx as a living entity, where "they hit
charged particles, such as electrons in a radio or television antenna,
and they shake the particles back and forth, stripping the information
carried by the waves in the particles"; Thus, "thin body" is exactly the
feedback of this "information" of the force of the Big Bang!
As Kip S. Thorne said, "Newton gave us the answer." Hawking
gave us the problem. Hawking's question itself would go on to
produce breakthroughs for decades. When we finally grasp the laws
of quantum gravity and fully understand the birth of the universe, it
may be thanks largely to standing on Hawking's shoulders." ...
Twenty "Put a grain of sand on the tip of your finger at arm's
length" confirmed by a color photograph of the singularity 13 billion
years ago
Big bang
On July 11, 2022, US President Joe Biden unveiled at the White
House an image of the galaxy cluster SMACS0723, known as Webb's
first Deep Field, which is the deepest and clearest infrared image of
the distant universe taken by the Webb Space Telescope to date, and
the first full-color image taken by the Webb Telescope. The National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) released a large
collection of photographs and spectral data from the Webb Space
Telescope Tuesday at the Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
What can this first precious image tell us about the early universe?"
Reuters reports that the first full-color image taken by the Webb
Space Telescope is an image of a galaxy cluster, giving us the clearest
glimpse ever of the early universe. The image, released jointly by U.S.
President Joe Biden and NASA Administrator Nielsen, shows a galaxy
cluster called SMACS0723, 4.6 billion light-years away. Its combined
mass acts like a "gravitational lens," distorting space and greatly
amplifying the light from the more distant galaxies behind it...
Weber's first color image.
"Faced with the vastness of the universe, human beings are
always full of curiosity: how did the universe originate? Is there
extraterrestrial life? It is with this mission that the James Webb SpaceTelescope begins its journey into space. "If you put a grain of sand at
the tip of your finger at arm's length, that's part of the universe you're
looking at -- just a tiny dot in the universe." Bill Nelson, administrator
of the US space agency NASA, introduced the first full-color deep
space image of the universe taken by the Webb Space Telescope on
the 11th.
The image is of the SMACS 0723 cluster, which contains
thousands of galaxies, NASA said. The image shows the cluster as it
was about 4.6 billion years ago, and because it is about 4.6 billion
light-years away, the light now being received by telescopes is much
older
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 165
Sent before.
Part of the image is light from shortly after the Big Bang, more
than 13 billion years ago. The total mass of the SMACS 0723 cluster
allows it to create a "gravitational lensing" effect that magnifies the
more distant galaxies behind it, NASA said. 】 That is, the Big Bang is
not a fantasy hypothesis; It is the theory that the universe was really
born in the Big Bang 13 billion years ago and has been confirmed and
proved by the "7.11" "color map" - "part of the image is from the light
shortly after the" Big Bang ", that is, 13-13.8 billion years!"
166 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
Chapter 17 Bunsen discovers that the "negative entropy of the
sphere" of the galaxy is generated all day long
The vital ecological "channel" is a subtle evidence of the Big Bang
everywhere
One, modern Japan Minamata town found a strange disease
Let us first tell you that modern people have found two typical
cases of environmental pollution in the world, and from the channels
through which pollution factors accumulate into the human body, we
will deeply understand the real micro-ecological effects of the
"Bunsen channel" hidden in the universe.
In April 1956, Minamata town, Japan, found a strange disease,sick speech, walking instability, violent temperament. Within a year,
116 people had fallen ill and 43 had died. The patient's hands
trembled so much that he could not drink water, or even strike a
match and light a cigarette; Heavy lying on the bed is also constantly
jumping up, in pain. At that time, the town doctor could not find the
cause, so he had to call it "Minamata disease". After two years of
investigation, Minamata disease was identified as heavy metal
poisoning, and researchers found methylmercury (a highly toxic
chemical) in the patient's body. How does methylmercury form and
enter the body?
Second, modern research reveals the origin of methylmercury =
hydrochloric acid + compound + bacteria in silt
Explosive mysterious "Bunsen channel" : sulfuric acid +
compound + bacteria
As can be seen in the figure, methylmercury is produced by the
interaction of sulfuric acid and chloride with bacteria in the seabed
silt of small methylmercury ——————— ———. Water pollution
due to its solubility. Methylmercury is 200 times more toxic than
chlorine and enters organisms; Water → -- → Fish, shellfish → Grains
irrigated with contaminated water from land → Fruits and vegetables
→ Water-soluble fruits, vegetables, and grains enter the human body
(organism) and eat the organism, the toxin will be transferred to the
human body, and the accumulation of methylmercury will cause
changes. According to the investigation of the upstream of Minamata
Bay - the acetic acid synthesis workshop of a nitrogen fertilizer
company was built in 1949, chloride and sulfuric acid are the origin of
methylmercury discharged into Minamata Bay with sewage after the
catalytic use of the workshop = hydrochloric acid + logocompound +
bacteria in the sludge submerged "Minamata disease".
Third, the outbreak of dioxin pollution is everywhere
Let us look at a modern scientific discovery of natural chemical
hazards to biological phenomena: 3, 1999, Belgium by the discovery
of dioxins in feed caused by chicken eggs, abnormal growth of broiler
malignant pollution. Dioxins were also found in the feed of cattle and
pigs. Subsequently, the Netherlands, France and Germany in Europe
also
found
abnormal
growth
of
livestock
caused
by
dioxin-contaminated feed. According to the study, dioxin is not a
chemical product produced by human beings, the main source ismunicipal waste incineration, impurities containing chlorinated
scientific products, paper pulp, drifting, automobile exhaust... Dioxins
are commonly known as polychlorinated toluene, ethylbenzene and
other elements, which are toxic chlorine compounds. The toxicity is
1000 times greater than methyl cyanide, and the toxicity is
comparable to DDT, which is the "king of poisons". It can pass through
the skin, mucous membranes, respiratory tract, and digestive tract
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 167
Enter the human body (including animals); However, more than
90% of the damage is caused by diet, and small amounts of ingestion
such as dioxins are immediately emitted
Disease changes, causing nervous system, endocrine disorders,
deformities, cancer. Dioxin is resistant to high temperature, strong
stability, once ingested is difficult to eliminate; It is not easy to
degrade. Through → through the biological chain accumulation, its
channels are as follows:
Fourth, cat - mouse - bee - grass - cow - human ecological
universe Big Bang "negative entropy" cycle diagram
We take the above two cases and Darwin's description of the
ecological energy ↓ → cat - mouse - bee - grass - cow - man cycle,
American ecological man → ↓↑← → atmosphere ↓↑→←
The modern biologist Lindemann's biological chain theory,
(biological chain pyramid) and the British ecologist Tanslie's
ecosystem theory and the French entomologist Farrell proposed the
nature of life: The identity of worm, manure, grass, sheep and man.
Put the old Chinese proverb: "Big fish eat small fish, small fish eat
shrimp, shrimp fruit sheep cattle chicken duck food egg shellfish
seafood eat grass mud." By comparing the interconnections, we can
find that these modern scientists have deeply realized from different
angles in different times and in different forms that the universe, life,
earth and all things generally exist under certain conditions an open
and secret "negative entropy" ecological logistics channel of the big
Bang; The individual species and the intangible logistics channel are
always connected with the gramineae, and the regional life ecological
network of individual life system and community system of any
biological species can be freely entered and left under any materialand natural conditions.
This formless channel of soil and water, invisible to the human
eye, allows life and inanimate things to assimilate throughout the day,
It provides the necessary conditions to ensure the existence of
the free movement of various forms of life function, and we call this
kind of invisible life network channel of the big Bang nature "Bunsen
channel", and the natural life effect generated by the Bunsen channel
is called the channel effect.
Five, Bunsen found the Big Bang "sphere negative entropy"
all-weather life microecology "channel"
What is the Bunsen Channel?
As we said earlier, Robert Bunsen, a chemistry professor in
Medel, modern Germany, was the first to use scientific experimental
methods to truly discover a laboratory lamp - the Bunsen burner.
Bunsen burner ignition can emit a very high heat flame, Bunsen put
salt, coal, metal chips on the flame burning, immediately found that
each substance in the burning will emit its own unique light. Like
sodium metal, which emits a permanent yellow flame, potassium,
which emits a purple flame - spectroscopic analysis is still the method
used by Hubble and Webb to study galaxies in the universe. So. He
had discovered a very simple and rapid method of spectroscopic
analysis of matter; However, because potassium, sodium, and lithium
salts all emit the same yellow flame, they cannot be distinguished.
Causing Bunsen a problem. At this time, Kirchhoff, professor of
physics at Medeburg, used the prism to analyze the nature of light,
and broke down the flame of various substances on the Bunsen
burner into different spectral characteristics, thus inventing a new
instrument - spectrometer. When the light of the Bunsen burner
shines on the prism of the spectrometer, it can be seen that the chips
of potassium salt, lithium salt, and sodium salt burn in the flame, and
the flame of each substance emits a different spectrum composed of
several different color bands. For example, the spectrum of sodium
contains only one yellow line
Article. Potassium purple flame has three: two red, one purple...
In this way, spectral analysis can separate various kinds of
Distinguish it from the substance and measure the amount of
sodium in 10 millionths of a milligram. So Bunsen used this method tolook at all kinds of things.
One day, Bunsen found a trace of lithium in a rock, which is
growing in the crack of the rock a shrub, Bunsen thought that this
shrub from the rock to absorb nutrients, its leaves must contain
lithium, Bunsen put the leaves on the lamp to burn, sure enough,
emitted the unique spectrum of lithium (there is a very bright red line
and a hazy orange yellow line). Bunsen gave the leaves to a cow to eat,
and put the milk in the lamp flame burning, also found the lithium
spectrum; Bunsen gave the owner another cup of milk to drink, and
from a drop of the owner's blood, he saw a bright red line and a hazy
orange line next to it... In this way, it proves that lithium has entered
the blood of the cattle owner. Bunsen found and proved by
experiment that the logistics channel which has been left to the
natural life field all over the world - "itself channel".
This is the experimental proof of the earliest modern scientists
from the Aristotelian principle of ecological energy in 3100 years, to
the Steinlie ecosystem, the Lindemann biological chain, and Fabre's
biological nature, which is unfortunately hidden in the dust of time for
more than 13 billion years by the widespread application of spectral
analysis.
The six "Bunsen channels" are hidden throughout the Big Bang
biology and Earth stars
Tie all corners
In fact, the "Bunsen Channel" is a Big Bang hidden and
ubiquitous in all corners of the Big Bang whole life Earth galaxy, which
is infinitely universal. The Bunsen Passage reveals a secret:
Any matter has the ability to enter and exit the microecology of
any individual organism, and the tangible individual life of a species is
always connected with the formless logistics channel, which is the
"channel effect" of the Big Bang negative energy microcycle of the
universe, and the microscopic witness of the instinctive properties of
the big Bang universe in the ecological energy spiral network.
The nature of the Big Bang is truly and profoundly felt by modern
humans from the Bunsen experiment: [The Big Bang produced a lot of
positive energy, and it also produced an equal amount of negative
energy. In this way, the positive and negative always add up to zero.
This is another law of nature...
So, where is this negativity prevalent today? Let's take a look atthe third ingredient in the modern cosmic recipe: it's in space. It may
sound strange, but according to the natural laws of gravity and
motion - those oldest in science - space itself is a huge storehouse of
negative energy, enough to ensure that everything adds up to zero. 】
-- Stephen Hawking, Reflections on Ten Questions
The Webb telescope color map study completely proved
Hawking's Big Bang theory. The negative energy of the 13.7 billion
year cosmic explosion exists in the Earth's big life field, the "Jatsen
channel effect" is a free, all-directional and open overall ecological
"negative entropy" logistics channel between organisms and
individual life. From the Bunsen test "spectral analysis" just like
Weber saw the big Bang, let us see with our own eyes, 10 millionths
of a milligram of lithium from the rock through the tree root - trunk -
branches - leaves flow into the whole body of the tree, and through
the leaves into the cow body, throughout the cow cells, organs,
tissues; Then from cow's milk into the human body, through human
blood: a drop of blood
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 169
Spectroscopic evidence of the arrival and existence of lithium... If
you consider cow and human feces, lithium will easily return
The soil. Then the small pieces of insect dung described by Fabre
enter the grass plant - grass - sheep - man... This is the real, intuitive,
experimentally proven broad spectrum of the Big life field the Big
Bang "negative energy" left in the Earth's large explosive channel.
The subtlety and depth of the "Bunsen channel" and "spectral
analysis" far exceed the deep connotation of the ecosystem and
biological chain, and it is the most intuitive proof of the "negative
energy" left over from the Big Bang.
Modern humans can use the experimental method of "Bunsen
channel" to discover and understand pollution: air pollution, river,
river, ocean pollution, water pollution, soil pollution, until biological
pollution... It becomes more intuitive, deeper, easier to understand,
and more holistic! Similarly, use the Bunsen channel experiment to
look at Minamata disease, dioxin pollution cases, and read the
American biologist Chale Carlson's "Silent Spring.Similarly, biologist
Hogan Margolis says, "Every square centimeter of human skincontains about 100,000 microbes (microbes also include non-bacterial
single-celled organisms; But the vast majority are bacteria.) If 10% of
the human body is the amount of bacteria is accurate, the existence
of quantum properties of human and bacterial symbiosis and
co-solubility is the indisputable fact of "half strain drift"
entanglement.
Obviously, the Bunsen channels that bacteria form in organisms
are too subtle to be observed with modern microscopes. If you take
into account the "fissure fauna" and the "in-stone organisms" found
in the ancient frozen rocks of Antarctica, the lower limit of the energy
left over from the Big Bang in the Earth's ecological energy spiral
network will go deep into the sea floor, and its upper limit will float to
the entire universe.
Because the generation of oxygen in the global atmosphere and
the "terrestrial cycle" and composition are inseparable from plant
reproduction, especially from the drift of bacteria half strains! ... In
short, the spectral analysis of the Earth's strange wide universe
"Bunsen channel" proves that life is a cosmic energy self-consistent
bioenergy microcycle broad spectrum relatively independent cosmic
system, and any life never excludes any material using the Bunsen
channel to freely enter and exit the organism (cells, organs, tissues),
especially the quantum properties of sex genes "half drift".
We call this natural phenomenon left over from the energy of
the Big Bang the Bunsen channel effect. Referred to as the "channel
effect", it shows that people (microorganisms) and nature are always
symbiotic, co-accommodating, co-consistent, and interlinked with the
quantum properties of the Big Bang Weber type "human-nature
induction" gene "half-strain drift"... It is also the most favorable
Weberian "spectral analysis" of the universe's negative energy and
the most powerful proof of the omnidirectional existence of gene
entanglement in the whole life of the Big Bang.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 171
Chapter 18, modern science master Schrodinger's greatest
contribution to the quantum properties of the whole life science of
the Big BangSchrodinger integrated physics and life science to create and
return to the whole life of the Big Bang
Learning classical quantum properties "Life lives on negative
entropy"
In the preface to the opening chapter of What Is Life,
Schrodinger explicitly states: "We have inherited from our ancestors a
strong desire for unity, omniscience and knowledge. The name
university of the highest learning (the word "university" in English and
universal students) reminds us of the many centuries from ancient
times to the present, only the universal can be the only score. But the
expansion of the various branches of knowledge over the last 100
years in both breadth and depth has presented us with a strange
dilemma. It is clear to us that, on the one hand, we are only at the
beginning of obtaining certain reliable sources for the synthesis of all
known knowledge into a unified whole; On the other hand, however,
it is almost impossible for a person to command more than a narrow
field of expertise. Unless some of us dare to sum up facts and theories,
even if some of them are secondary and incomplete, and run the risk
of thinking ourselves fools, I see no other dangerous way out of this
dilemma. Otherwise, our real goal will never be achieved." This
opening shows that Schrodinger integrated physics into life science
and deduced the use of quantum mechanics to study macromolecules
of life.
Schrodinger exclaimed: "That is, the genetic structure seems to
contain only a relatively small number of atoms (on the order of
1000UM, perhaps less). Yet it exhibits the most regular, law-abiding
activity - and has such permanence that it is a miracle."
Using quantum mechanics, Schrodinger found that the history of
ancient life evolution proved that except for the short embryonic
period (seed germination is no exception), the development of
"negative entropy" from the mother, the whole growth period to
death is completely based on obtaining (food) survival (life lives on
negative entropy - Schrodinger), and confirmed the "two-stage law"
of life; Most of them are naturally formed by the food instinct, and
any organism is subject to the restriction of food (material), and
chooses the food that is suitable for the species. That is to say, species
and food (things) are corresponding to each other, beneficial andprolong the instinct of life, the source of inheritance and continuity
through the ages, RNA replication never changes.
What Is Life? Microscopic species invariance theory of conclusive
quantum mechanics of life
RNA replication never changes, which inevitably leads to
Linnaeus's "species invariance theory" from the whole life of the Big
Bang; Schrodinger puts it this way: "Today we know with certainty
that Darwin was mistaken in taking as the material of natural
selection the small, continuous accidental variations that are bound
to occur even in the purest population.
Yes. Because it turns out that these variations are not inherited.
This fact is important enough to merit a brief explanation. If you take
a bundle of purebred barley, measure the length of the wheat stalk by
ear, and plot the results, you will get a bell curve, as shown in Figure 7.
The graph shows the number of ears of wheat with a definite length
in relation to the length of wheat. In other words, a certain medium
length is dominant, and there will be a certain frequency of deviation
in both directions. Now pick a set of ears (the black ones in the
picture) that are significantly longer than average, but have enough
ears to seed the field and grow a new crop. If the same statistics were
applied to newly grown barley, Darwin might have expected the
corresponding curve to shift to the right. In other words, he would
expect to increase the average length of the wheat by selection. This
is not the case if a truly pure-bred strain of barley is used. The new
statistical curve obtained from the offspring of the long-awned ears
selected for sowing will be exactly the same as the first curve, as will
be the case if the ears with particularly short awns are selected for
seed. Selection makes no difference - because small, continuous
variations are not inherited. These variations are clearly not based on
the structure of the genetic material, but on chance. About 40 years
ago, however, the Dutchman de Vries discovered that even in the
offspring of fully purebred breeds, 34 a very small number of
individuals (say, 2-3 parts per ten thousand) showed small but
"leaping" changes. "Jump" does not mean that the change is
considerable, but that it is discontinuous, with no intermediate form
between unchanged and slightly changed. De Vries called it a
mutation. The important fact is discontinuity. This reminds physicistsof quantum theory - there is no intermediate energy between two
adjacent energy levels. He would be inclined to compare de Vries's
theory of mutation to the quantum theory of biology. As we'll see
later, this is much more than a metaphor. Mutations are actually
caused by quantum transitions in gene molecules. However, when de
Vries first published his findings in 1902, quantum theory was only
two years old. No wonder it took another generation to discover the
close connection! - What Is Life? -33, 3
Schrodinger emphasized that "mutations must be rare events" :
So far we have tended to concentrate our attention on harmful
mutations, of which there may be more; but it must be made clear
that we have encountered favourable mutations as well. If
spontaneous mutation is a small step along the path of species
development, then we get the impression that some changes are
accidental "experiments" that run the risk of being harmful and
therefore automatically eliminated. This brings us to a very important
point. To be suitable material for natural selection, mutation must be
as rare an event as it actually is. If the mutation is so frequent that
there is a good chance, say, that a dozen different mutations appear
in the same body, the harmful mutation will generally prevail over the
beneficial mutation, and the species, instead of improving through
selection, will stagnate in a state of no improvement, or die out.
Schrodinger confirmed that species invariance comes from the
"conservation" of genes - [a considerable degree of conservation
resulting from the high persistence of genes is essential... because in
the previous sections we have asserted that frequent mutations are
detrimental to evolution.] For individuals who have acquired an
unstable genetic configuration through mutation, the offspring of
their "ultra-radical" rapid mutation will have difficulty growing
organically
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 173
Time to survive. The species will discard these individuals and
collect stable genes through natural selection
Come here. -- "What Is Life?"
When can a piece of matter be said to be alive? The answer is
when it continues to "do something," move, exchange matter with itsenvironment, etc., and can be expected to "last" much longer than
inanimate matter would under similar circumstances. When a
non-living system is isolated or placed in a uniform environment, all
motion is usually quickly brought to a standstill by the influence of
various frictional forces; differences in electric or chemical potential
disappear, as do substances tending to form compounds, and
temperatures become uniform by heat conduction. Thereafter, the
whole system gradually decays into a lifeless, inert mass, reaching a
permanent state in which observable events no longer occur.
Physicalists call this state thermodynamic equilibrium, or "maximum
entropy."
In fact, this state is usually reached very quickly. In theory, it is
often not yet a perfect equilibrium, not yet a true maximum
entropy. . -- "What Is Life" -56]... The ability of an organism to avoid
a rapid decline into an inert "equilibrium" state seems to have
become such a mystery that from very early times it has been claimed,
and still is claimed, that some special non-physical or supernatural
force (" vitality ", "implicit hope") is at work in the organism.
How do living organisms avoid decay? The obvious answer is:
through eating, drinking, breathing, and assimilation. The technical
term is metabolism. The word comes from the Greek μεταβάλλειν,
meaning "change" or "exchange". In exchange for what? The original
basic idea was undoubtedly the exchange of matter (for example, the
German word for metabolism, Stoffwechsel, literally means the
exchange of matter). It is absurd to think that material exchange
should be essential. Any nitrogen atom, oxygen atom, sulfur atom,
etc., is the same as any other nitrogen atom, oxygen atom, sulfur
atom. What do you get by exchanging them? We have been told that
we live on energy, and this temporarily quieted our curiosity. In
restaurants in some developed countries (I can't remember if it's
Germany or the United States, or both), you'll find menus showing
the energy content of each dish in addition to the price. Needless to
say, this is ridiculous. For an adult organism, the energy content is as
fixed as the matter content. Since any one calorie is worth the same
as any other, we really don't see the use of a simple exchange. 71
So, what is it in our food that is so precious that it keeps us from
dying? This question is easy to answer. Every process, event, chance
happening-whatever it may be called, in short, everything that ishappening in nature means an increase in the entropy of the part of
the world in which it occurs. As a result, living organisms are
constantly increasing their entropy - or producing positive entropy, if
you like - towards the dangerous maximum entropy state, which is
death. The only way to escape death or to live is to absorb negative
entropy from the environment - and as we will soon see, negative
entropy is a very positive thing. organism
It feeds on negative entropy. Or, less paradoxically, the essence
of metabolism is to enable an organism to successfully eliminate all
the entropy it has had to produce while it is alive. - What is Life?
The genetic mechanism is closely related to and even based on
quantum theory
Genetic mechanisms have long been embedded in the whole
biology of the Big Bang
Schrodinger reveals in What Is Life: (The mechanism of heredity
is closely related to, and even built upon, quantum theory, which Max
Planck discovered in 1900.) Modern genetics can be traced back to
the rediscovery of Mendel's paper by de Vries, Collens, and Chermak
(1900), and De Vries's paper on mutation (1901-1903). So the two
theories were born almost simultaneously, and it is no wonder that
they had to mature to a certain degree before they became related.
More than a quarter of a century later, in 1926-1927, W.Heitler and
F.London outlined the general principles of quantum theory of
chemical bonds. Heitler-london theory contains the most
sophisticated ideas of recent advances in quantum theory, known as
"quantum mechanics" or "wave mechanics." "Life depends on
negative entropy" (negative entropy comes from the Big Bang); This
kind of species and food (things) correspond to one by one is the
origin of the universe since the Big Bang.
How durable, then, are genetic traits, and what properties must
the physical structures that carry them have as a result?
Schrodinger replied: "In fact, it is not necessary to study this
question. The mere fact that we are talking about genetic
characteristics suggests that we are acknowledging that persistence is
almost absolute." -- The highly unified system of species and food
formed by the long-term internal and external environment selection
of the living body, the energy comes from the mechanism of "life liveson negative entropy", and naturally forms the "species restriction
mechanism", the reason is that Schrodinger integrates physics and life
science to create the eternal and unchanging whole life law of
quantum mechanics: "life lives on negative entropy".
This "mechanism" as early as 1856 Mendel began the pea
hybridization experiment, and Mendel's ten years of pea tests were
confirmed and proved, and nature sublimated to the "3:1 life
mathematical" nature's secret number theory core! ...
Faced with the unique character of "the result of the cross
between yellow and green peas is that the offspring bear a uniform
color of yellow peas", Mendel had a unique answer:
"You see," Mendel explained, "there can only be one trait - a
seed cannot be yellow and green, and there can be two inherited
traits from both parents." What we see, then, is that if there are
conflicting traits inherited from the parents, only one will win - like
yellow seeds, purple flowers, and tall stems - and the other will be
'hidden'. It's simple, isn't it?"
What a pity! For years Mendel's genius prophecies were snuffed
out by authoritiesIt's a miracle that the activity of Irfa -- and it's so
persistent and permanent."
Schrodinger went on to emphasize: [To make the high
permanence of genetic material compatible with its tiny size, it was
necessary to avoid the tendency to disorder by "inventing the
molecule." In fact, such a molecule is so unusually large that it must
be the work of a highly differentiated order, protected by the magic of
quantum theory. As physicists know, the laws of classical physics have
been modified by quantum theory, especially at low temperatures.
There are many examples. Life seems to be one of them, and it is
particularly striking. Life seems to be the ordered and regular
behavior of matter, based not entirely on the tendency from order to
disorder, but partly on the preserved existing order.
In other words, the fact of biological persistence recorded in the
5,000 years of modern civilization does not support the false
proposition of "evolution" that one living thing can transform into
another living thing, which violates the "inheritance mechanism" of
the whole life science of the Big Bang!
Four, heredity is the mechanism! Genetics is the process of
selection that weeds out individuals of a species that doesn't survive.It is
The life of the intraspecific strong individual reproduction and
continuation of life through plant and animal reproduction (typing)
wholeness
See What Is Life? "Chapter II Genetic mechanisms
"Existence is eternal because there are laws that protect the
treasures of life from which the universe draws beauty."
-- Goethe
We conclude, then, that an organism and all the biologically
related processes it undergoes must have a very large number of
"polyatomic" structures and must prevent accidental "monatomic"
events from playing too great a role. What the naive physicist tells us
is important because it is possible for an organism to have sufficiently
precise laws of physics in accordance with which it can carry out its
fairly regular and orderly functions. From a biological point of view,
can these conclusions drawn a priori (that is, from a purely physical
point of view) correspond to actual biological facts?
At first glance, this conclusion is often dismissed as
inconsequential. For example, a biologist 30 years ago might have
talked about this. But for popular speakers who stress that statistical
physics is as important to organisms as it is elsewhere, this conclusion
is quite appropriate, though in fact it is no more than a well-known
truth. For to the adult individual of any higher organism, not only its
body, but every single cell of which it is composed, contains an
"astronomical number" of atoms. And, as was known thirty years ago,
every particular physiological process that we observe, either within
the cell or in its interaction with its surroundings, always contains so
many monatomic and monatomic processes. This guarantees the
validity of the relevant laws of physics and chemistry, even according
to statistical physics
Learning about the strict requirements of "large numbers" can
also ensure the validity of the law; This strict requirement is what I
just referred to as the √ n law.
We now know that assumption was wrong. As we shall see below,
there are many very small groups of atoms in living organisms, too
small to show precise statistical laws, and they do play a dominant
role in very ordered and very regular events. They control theobservable large-scale traits of organisms acquired in the process of
development, and determine the important characteristics of the
functions of organisms. In all these cases, very definite and strict
biological laws are revealed. 】- Heredity is the mechanism! Heredity
is a selection process to eliminate those who are not suitable for
survival, and it is a phenomenon of intraspecific reproduction through
animal and plant reproduction (typing), which is "speciality". The
biological individual left the reproduction (offspring), there is no
survival and survival struggle, let alone the gradual trend of natural
selection evolution and genetic mechanism; Since life in the universe
does not exist the laws of interspecific reproduction, species and
beyond species reproduction, interspecific individuals cannot mate,
cross and become sterile (i.e. make mating also sterile)!
Cross-species organisms are unable to reproduce, which
fundamentally blocks the mixed inheritance of different species of
individual organisms, which naturally forms a mechanism for lasting
preservation of the same species of individual life from the ancient
existence of species purity - we call this "species restriction
mechanism."
We call the process of natural selection in which individuals of
the same species maintain their own speciality "speciality restriction"
mechanism, which is the law of life nature of natural system. The
restriction mechanism is accomplished by Schrodinger's "genetic
mechanism". Without the offspring reproduction of individuals of the
same species, there is no heredity, let alone "genetic mechanism".
Darwin's "On the Origin of Species" is nothing but an insane hoax!
Using quantum theory, Schrodinger went further and said: "The
point is that each of the two [daughter cells] gets the other two
complete sets of chromosomes that are exactly like the parent cell.
Therefore, all somatic cells have exactly the same chromosomes.
No matter how little we know about this mechanism, we cannot
help but assume that it must be intimately involved in the functioning
of the organism through some sort of "quantum entanglement,"
because every single cell, even the less important one, possesses a
complete (two) copy of the codebook. 】 This is the "species
restriction mechanism" the Big Bang "quantum entanglement" has
existed since ancient times quantum mechanical proof!
The "species restriction mechanism" is not only the life law ofthe "genetic mechanism" of individual reproduction of plants and
animals, but also the same law exists in microorganisms (bacteria,
fungi, viruses). M. Delbrick, Nobel Prize winner in Medicine, proved
his conclusion through experiments in "The Controversy over the
Birth of Life" : "These recent results have consistently shown that the
survival of primers is a physicochemical way of dealing with viruses
without destroying their infectivity, and that individuals belonging to
the same virus must be unusually consistent." The uniform speed at
which such a group of individuals moves within the power apparatus,
crystallizes uniformly out of the solution, and its characteristic
infectivity is not altered by recrystallization, even in the case of the
greatest degree of fractional recrystallization." "In the past, there was
a mistaken view that bacterial viruses were chemical molecules rather
than living things.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 177
Our work shows that certain large proteins (later studies showed
that phage components are actually nucleic acids)
The molecule (virus) has the property of multiplying in living
organisms. It's a feature that's so different to chemistry and so
fundamental to biology."
From the modern scientific history, microbes are the "microbes"
in water droplets discovered by Hooke with a magnifying glass in 1675,
and people still can't see microscopic organisms with the naked eye
without magnification (microscopic technology). In which era electron
microscopy technology had not been born, and the interdisciplinarity
of quantum and molecular biology had not been produced, so Linne
did not complete the classification of microorganisms: The Swedish
naturalist and plant taxonomist Carlos Linnaeus, in his masterpiece
Systema Naturae published in 1735, scientifically divided the "two
realms" (plant and animal kingdom) proposed by the ancient Greek
philosopher Aristotle based on perceptual knowledge: The biological
kingdom is divided into the plant kingdom and the animal kingdom,
and the historical limitation has left a microbiological classification tail
- microbiological subgroup; So far, modern microbes are only
distinguished from the big framework: bacteria, fungi, viruses...
Specific to each type of microorganism is divided into bacillus,round, flat, spherical, spiral shape differentiation; Or to its infectious
diseases called smallpox, plague bacteria, tuberculosis, cold bacteria
and so on... However, no matter how the classification of
microorganisms, the "species restriction mechanism" is the nature of
the individual life that the natural system can not change, which is the
source of the "Koch criterion"! The pathogenic characteristics of
microorganism are unique. Smallpox only infects smallpox, COVID-19
only infects COVID-19, TB only infects tuberculosis... The pathogenic
causes of microbial "genetic mechanism" can only spread a specific
disease (genetic factor), and naturally form the speciation of specific
transmission of microbial infection, which is the exclusive expression
of microbial "speciation restriction mechanism".
(Delbruck's general description of genetic material shows that
living matter, though subject to established "laws of physics," may
also involve "other laws of physics" that are not yet known, and which,
once revealed, will be as essential a part of the science as the
previous laws.) -- Schrodinger, What Is Life?
In the integration of Schrodinger's "genetic mechanism" in the
"quantum entanglement", proposed by Qiang Yanping and naturally
born!
178 Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
Chapter 19 The instinct of the "genetic mechanism" of the six
realms of modern man comes from the everlasting "species" of the
whole life science of the Big Bang
First, modern scientist Linnaeus's taxonomy left a gap in the
classification of microorganisms
In 1735, Linnaeus's "Natural System" came out, completing the
classification of the "two realms" (plant kingdom and animal kingdom)
proposed by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, and completing
the division of the biological realm into the plant kingdom and the
animal kingdom. And put forward "species unchanged"! Linnaeus
said:
"1. Since there are no new species; (2) Since one kind of life
always produces its kind of creatures; 3. Since each individual of every
living thing is always the beginning of its descendants, the
immutability of these ancestors must be attributed to someomniscient... This is demonstrated by the mechanisms, principles,
laws, constitutions, and feelings of every living individual "- this"
two-boundary
immutable
"mechanism
is
the
natural"
species-conditioned mechanism "instinct!
For many years after Hooke's discovery of microorganisms with a
magnifying glass in 1675, before the advent of the electron
microscope, Linnaeus's two-kingdom classification continued to
dominate the taxonomy of life. However, with the advent of the
electron microscope and the discovery of more and more species of
microorganisms, there was a historical limitation of the "two realms"
of Linnaean life, which left gaps in the classification of microorganisms:
for example, there was a dispute between the Linnaean realms, which
included paramecia, amoeba, and Plasmodium in the animal kingdom,
and the Linnaean realms, which included algae (such as gymnophytes
and dinoflagellates) in the plant kingdom; Because these tiny
organisms are structurally much simpler than multicellular animals
and plants, they are simply "single-celled organisms". In 1866, on the
basis of the Linnaean two realms, the "protists" were added, and the
classification of life became: a three-kingdom classification system;
Filling in the gaps left by Linnaean taxonomy.
Modern scientists have found in the greenstone belt some 3.77
billion to 4.28 billion years old
The fossil bacteria of the year
[March 2017] "As reported by the Spanish newspaper El Pais on
March 1, An international team of geologists, paleontologists and
nanoscientists from London, the United States and Norway has
discovered fossils of bacteria between 3.77 billion and 4.28 billion
years old in the Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt in Hudson Bay in
northern Quebec, Canada, 4.5 billion years after the birth of Earth.
The fossil bacteria are therefore considered to be the oldest known
evidence of life. "... "The Nuvvuagittuq greenstone belt contains some
of the oldest sedimentary rocks known to geology, which were
originally part of a deep-sea hydrothermal vent rich in radioactive iron.
Many scientists believe that these energy-rich and mineral-rich places
were the cradle of the first forms of life on Earth, the earliest bacteria,
four billion years ago. "Scientists have found the oldest known
evidence of life: 4.2 billion-year-old fossil bacteria. Zhou Qinghao -
According to Hawking's "Big Bang" theory, the universe and the earthneed a cooling period of 600-800 million years, so that between 3.77
billion and 4.28 billion years ago, 1 billion people were born on Earth
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 179
After bacteria appeared later, the Earth could have been
deposited into fossils during the long geological evolution process
after cooling.
According to Matthew Dodd, a scientist at the University of
Modern London, the discovery supports the theory that life sprouted
in deep-sea thermal vents shortly after the birth of the Earth. The
rapid emergence of life on Earth is also consistent with previous
discoveries of microbes that are 3.7 billion years old. So 3.7 billion
years ago, microbes were born; However, it was Antony van
Leeuwenhoek (October 24, 1632 - August 26, 1723) who discovered
"very tiny animals" in tooth dirt in 1674. These are bacteria and
protozoa (microorganisms). In what form and how do bacteria enter
tartar? Hook did not specify. Become an eternal mystery, lost. 】 --
From Qiang Yanping's "Half-plant Drift Theory"
Third, the "specific restriction mechanism" led scientist Pasteur
to discover the bacterial silkworm disease "pepper powder"
The pioneering bacteria are the source of infection
Although bacteria existed for 4.6 billion years (as modern
humans think), they were invisible to the human eye until 1683, Levin
said. Hooke's homemade single-lens microscope magnified 200 times
and accidentally found bacteria;
In 1878, French surgeon Charles Emmanuel Sedillot (1804-1883)
proposed the concept of "microorganism" to describe bacteria,
because bacteria are single-celled microorganisms, human eyes can
see the reproduction and pathogenic immunity of bacteria, It was not
until 1865 that Pasteur of France first discovered:
In July 1865, Pasteur arrived in Alais (Alais; Sericulture),
personally participated in the research of sericulture disease, the
body of the sick silkworm is covered with brown black spots, like a
sticky pepper. The French called it the pepper disease. Pasteur soon
from the silkworm pupa and silkworm moth form of "pepper" found
fast reproduction, can infect silkworm pathogens, Pasteur observed
with a microscope, found a small, oval brown particles, it infected thesilkworm and mulberry leaves, the source of the silkworm disease
found and found a way to kill the pathogen, finally subduing silkworm
disease.
So, how does the pathogen of "pepper powder" enter silkworms
and mulberry leaves to infect silkworms? Still a mystery! ...
In 1880, Louis Pasteur successfully developed a variety of
vaccines such as chicken cholera vaccine and rabies vaccine,
pioneered the theory of vaccinology and immunization method, and
completed the major reform of medical practice in the 19th century,
and was recognized by the world as the "ancestor of bacteriology".
Four, modern scientists "Koch quasi4. The microorganism can be
isolated and cultured again from the host where the disease is tested.
Koch's rule is based on the species invariance and Malthusian
"two principles" of life science theory, is the origin of "species
constraints" origin!
Five, modern scientist Japanese biologist Yasuwatanabe found
microbes "free floating.
DNA ring"
In 1963, Japanese biologist Tsuwatanabe found the "half-plant
drift" coded DNA carrier, found a mysterious phenomenon of bacteria,
and found that bacteria also contain free floating DNA rings. That's
what we call plastid today.
According to Twatanabe: The "free floating DNA ring" may be an
independent organism, so the plastid is the smallest ecological
micro-organism in the world, and it is believed that it may be an
independent organism, so the plastid is the smallest ecological
micro-organism in the world, it has the ability to live and reproduce in
the cell wall of bacteria, when a pair of bacteria meet, Plastids can be
passed from one to another, or even from one bacterium to another.
Further studies have shown that the "free-floating DNA rings" can
bind to cellular chromosomes on their own, that plastid fragments
can move from one plastid to another, or that they themselves attach
to the chromosomes of the microbe in which they reside, or to
another bacterium. This is the manifestation of Schrodinger's
quantum mechanical "quantum transition" and "half-plant drift" in
the smallest living element, showing the circular DNA floating freely in
the cell, and the random mysterious changes and turnaround of
bacteria. The existence of the Earth's cosmic microorganismseverywhere "half drift" characteristic drift characteristics - this is the
formation of the universe, Earth galaxies, atmospheric
microorganisms everywhere, come without trace without shadow! ...
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 181
Six, the modern American biologist Copperland set up a "fungal
world"
For a long time, humans have often confused fungi with bacteria,
so as to ignore the origin of fungi. Later, it was found that some
characteristics of fungi are similar to plants, and some aspects are
similar to animals. Further, according to comparative studies of
nutritional methods, edible mushrooms and bread yeast... Not fit into
the plant kingdom; The chemical composition of the cell wall is chitin
rather than cellulose, glycogen rather than starch is stored, and
although heterotrophic, it is primarily saprophytic or parasitic, very
different from animals or other plants. Scientists confirm that they are
neither plants nor animals, but a separate group of organisms; In
1938, the American biologist Copperland set up another fungal realm,
and since then the classification of life has become: the "four realms"
class system.
The independence of fungi and the discovery of fungi with the
"four realms", the next classification will make the "food chain"
perfect into the "six realms" classification of life. Complete further
microbiological subdivision.
7. Modern scientist Weiteck classified the "Prokaryotes" into the
"five Realms"
From the biological point of view, the microorganisms in nature
can be divided into eukaryotic microorganisms (such as fungi and
slime molds in the fungal kingdom, microscopic algae in the plant
kingdom and protozoa and metazoa in the animal kingdom),
prokaryotic microorganisms (such as all kinds of well-known bacteria);
With the discovery of prokaryotic organisms without nuclei - bacteria,
cyanobacteria, actinomyces, mycoplasma, chlamydia, Rickettsia, etc.
(at least 4000 species have been found so far)...
In 1969, the biologist Weitek added the "prokaryotic world" to
the "four realms" and proposed a widely used classification system of
five realms.Although prokaryotes were once the only form of life on Earth,
monopolizing the planet for more than 2 billion years, they did not
have any membranous organelles in their cells, but they also
reproduced by division as if they did not have sex, which is no
different from bacterial sex, and this classification has been widely
accepted.
The discovery of modern viruses
Humans discovered the virus relatively late, in the 1840s -- in fact,
it was the German agricultural chemist Adolf Eduard Mayer
(1843-1942), who had conducted long observational and
experimental studies of tobacco cultivation since 1879. In 1882, the
Tobacco disease was named "tobacco Mosaic disease", which was the
first Virus to be discovered (TMV); Maier was the first person to
discover the pathogenic factors of tobacco Mosaic disease, and his
research results had a great impact on the Russian student Ivanovsky
who was writing a dissertation on tobacco Mosaic disease, and his
Dutch counterpart Bergerink who was working in Wageningen, laying
a unique foundation. In an article published in 1944, Stanley argued
that there were considerable reasons to regard the Russian plant
physiologist Dmitri Ivanovsky (1864-1920) as the father of the new
discipline of virology; He shared the 1946 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for
the first successful preparation of the protein crystallization of
tobacco Mosaic virus. After the discovery of plant viruses, the concept
of viruses entered the animal kingdom and became the most
important pathogen to infect humans in modern times. -- For more
than 2,000 years
The Black Death and the Spanish Lady Flu of 1918 were all
studied in the field of virology! ...
Introduction to Modern Virology; Virus is a submicroscopic
parasitic remnant material particle containing protein capsid.
Different from bacteria, viruses are a class of extremely small
non-cellular organisms. It is small enough to pass through a bacterial
filter and can only be seen with the help of an electron microscope;
The structure of a virus is very simple, usually consisting of a protein
capsid and an inner nucleic acid core.
As William McNeill says, "We can never escape the limitations of
the ecosystem." Whether we like it or not, we are all in the food chain,eating and being eaten." -- The global novel coronavirus pandemic
that broke out in December 2019, as of January 16, according to
Worldometer real-time statistics, as of 6:30 am on January 16, 2022,
Beijing time, There have been 326,207,456 confirmed cases and
552,503 deaths worldwide. Globally, there were 2,802,276 new
confirmed cases and 7,578 new deaths per day. In other words,
552,503 people have been "eaten" globally...
9. Modern people find that the simple properties of the genetic
material in the outer protein shell of the virus do not belong to the
"five Realms"
Hence the "Six Kingdoms of Biology"
In the microbial world, there is also a food chain relationship
similar to that of animals and plants, and viruses do not belong to the
"five kingdoms". In view of the fact that viruses do not belong to the
"five kingdoms", Austrian biologist Trauba and Chinese entomologist
Chen Shixiang respectively proposed the "biological six kingdoms
classification system" in 1975 and 1977: The virus is defined as the
"sixth realm" outside the "five realms".
According to a report by the Daily Mail on March 13, 2020, a
mysterious microbe called "salt bacteria" found in the mud of the
deep sea of Japan is the missing link between simple "single-celled
organisms" such as ancient bacteria and the "multicellular organisms"
that gave birth to humans - the transitional stage between bacteria
and multicellular plants and animals.
Saltable fungus with incomplete spherical cells, about 500
nanometers in diameter, with elongated branched tentacles, has
some characteristics of "archaea". Archaea are relatively simple
single-celled organisms that lack a complete internal structure such as
the nucleus and are part of the prokaryotic cell population.
Scientists have long been puzzled by the evolution of simple
bacterial-like cells into complex eukaryotic cells. To solve the mystery,
the Japanese research team spent 10 years collecting mud containing
archaea, growing salt bacteria in the lab, and studying its relationship
with a companion bacterium to determine whether it could evolve
into a cell with a more complex nucleus at the next stage... "Humans
are made of eukaryotic cells, and the question of their origin and
evolution is a crucial one." "Subpopulations of salt bacteria live on the
cold ocean floor near the Rocky Castle hydrothermal vent systembetween Greenland and Norway, and are living relatives of the
earliest fungal organisms," said study co-author Nobunobu Masashi, a
microbiologist at the Tsukuba Institute of Industrial Technology in
Tsukuba, Japan.
Is the virus alive from the simple properties of the genetic
material inside the outer protein shell? There are no final answers to
these two questions yet - scientific research will continue to update
traditional doctrines or ideas...
In the year 3000, the virus caused more damage to modern
humans than ever before
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 183
The 5×10 ^ 9 bits of information in our encyclopedia of life is
contained in every cell nucleus
Medium. Each cell is thus a complete library of instructions for
what constitutes every part of the body, and when a fertilized egg
divides, the first two sets of (quantum entanglement) genetic
instructions are carefully replicated in the development process that
forms a human embryo. In terms of numbers, a virus requires about
10 to the 13 petes of information to form. This can be seen in the
deciphering of the Spanish lady flu virus:
Modern people found and recorded that from the Black Death in
431 BC to the 1918 Spanish Lady flu virus detonated human disaster
has been more than 3,000 years, the great flu alone killed 50 million -
100 million people! ... The virus's damage to humans is
unprecedented; Until the outbreak of the global new coronavirus
pandemic in 2019, it is still raging in the world today!
In 1996, Taubenberg, a member of the Institute of Modern
Military Pathology, used molecular biology techniques to isolate
fragments of the 1918 influenza virus from lung slices of 1918 dead in
the U.S. Military Pathology Bank. This is just a snippet of what is said
to have been an expedition to the tundra; In 1997, Taubenberg
received samples from Johan Helting, and in October 2005, he
succeeded in artificially replicating the 1918 pandemic virus strain,
establishing a "transformed" recombination model of two
"half-strains" of virus. The identification of the Spanish Lady
pandemic influenza virus as a combination of swine and humangenetic evolution of the H1N1 virus, created the world's human and
animal half-strain "H1" and "N1" plague half-strain naming.
In 2005, Taubenberg copied and created an entire series of viral
genes "half strain" (H and N) serial combination naming system: this is
the H, N geometric series of the decomposition of lactose two
enzyme markers, 16 and 9 mathematical combination.
There are 144 combinations of 16 "H" and 9 "N" combinations;
The 9 "N" and 16 "H" combinations also have 144 combinations, and
the mutation and recombination of mutant viruses constitute a rather
large geometric series of virus naming data. In other words, "H1" and
"N1" together are one virus,
It is an H1N1 virus of the Orthomyxoviridae family. In the same
family as H1N1 are H5N1,
H7N2, H1N7, H7N3, H13N6, H5N9, H11N6, H3N8, H5N2, H4N8,
H10N7,
H2N2, H8N4, H14N5, H6N5, H12N5, H9N2, H15N9 and so on...
Countless! Here, the "H" and "N" virus "half strain" naming, "H" and
"N" is just a marker.
"H" number is "hemagglutinin type";
The "N" number is "neuraminidase type"; In fact, humans do not
fully understand all of the series of viruses, so little is currently known,
which is in line with the virus requires about 10 to 13 bitts of
information to constitute the virus specific properties!
11. Why do the six Realms of life generally follow the "Koch
Principle" and never exceed it
Modern people see Dow H1N1 number as the principle of
labeling: according to 1 H and 1N, including variants of all the above
each virus has been "transformed" mutated into a variety of
"semi-strains" with different combinations of "H" and "N" with
different pathogenic symptoms and specific profiles; 1 of a
microbiological pathogen specific to a disease
Individual species and half-strain infection can only be converted
into a specific infectious disease. This is consistent with Mendel to
Morgendine
Laws, especially the "Koch criteria" and McClintock "jumping
genes" and "half-plant jumping", Bernard "internal environment" and
other biological laws and laws.This is why the six realms of life generally follow the "Koch
principle" of biological instinct, the law. So, are viruses living?
It's not living but it infects living things; The virus has a special
function: the virus can inject genetic material into the living cells of
other organisms at any time and anywhere for reproduction, which is
a virus-specific infection process.
Viruses are so small, measured in nanometers, that they can only
be seen in an electron microscope. Viruses are only six-kingdom
organisms without cell structure, which are mostly distinguished by
the appearance of viruses. Virus structure is single: only 1, protein
shell, 2, internal genetic material (DNA and RNA), viruses can be
divided into RNA viruses or DNA viruses; Its protein shell is entirely
protective of the genetic material inside the virus.
Modern scientists have found that viral parasitic microorganisms,
strictly following Bernard's "internal and external environmental laws",
can only survive and reproduce in living cells, and once they leave
living cells, they cannot survive independently and become crystals. In
view of this, infecting living cells is the only way for the virus to
survive and reproduce - the virus also has the property of "half-strain
drift", which is everywhere in the land, sea, sky, and earth galaxy;
Human beings have more than 200 known viruses, 80% of human
infectious diseases are caused by viruses and strictly follow the "Koch
principle" (a straight virus can only infect one specific disease); Such
as AIDS, influenza, smallpox, SARS, viral hepatitis and the 1918
Spanish Lady flu, the 2022 global pandemic of the new coronavirus
and so on... No matter how the mutation always spread the virus
"specific disease", and there is no special drug to treat the virus
(specific disease), can only rely on improving their own immunity and
specific vaccines.
In the year 3000, the virus caused unprecedented harm to
human beings - the virus changes all the time
And strictly follow the "Koch principle" 2
The bamboo can not be destroyed! For a thing has the nature of
a thing;
Koch's rule is a set of scientific verification methods proposed by
the great German bacteriologist Robert Koch (1843 ~ 1910) to verify
the relationship between bacteria and diseases, and is regarded as
the golden rule for the identification of infectious diseases. It has laidthe foundation for the establishment of systematic research methods
of pathogenic microbiology and made it an independent science"CNN
reported Monday that at least 17 countries and territories have
reported cases of the Omicron strain, and 69 countries and territories
have imposed travel restrictions due to the presence of the strain.
This is a "missing gene" expression, with up to 32 variants of Omicron,
more than four times as many as Delta (the Delta strain has seven
variants). Mutate! Ability to drift; Drift can be "fit"! The Omicron
strain lacks an S gene that can be used to identify the signature of the
novel coronavirus, which produces a spikelike protein on the strain. "It
has made a huge leap in mutation, much more mutation than we
expected," said Oliveira, director of South Africa's Outbreak Response
and Innovation Center. B.1.1.529 has an "unusual mutation
population" with 50 mutations and 32 mutations on the spike protein.
According to National Public Radio, B.1.1.529 has more than twice as
many mutations as Delta.
On December 4, according to the Reuters website, US
researchers found that at least one mutation in the mutant Omicron
strain of the new coronavirus was caused by a special gene segment,
and this gene segment is present in a variety of other viruses,
including a virus that causes the common cold.
Omicron strain infection symptoms: Most patients are showing
flu-like symptoms, such as a dry cough, fever, and limb pain, but there
has been no significant increase in hospitalizations - Uben Pillay, a
senior doctor who runs a clinic in Gauteng province, South Africa,
where cases have soared recently, noted that while the number of
COVID-19 patients coming in recently has increased significantly, their
symptoms are generally mild. The report's key observations from 42
hospitalized COVID-19 patients were that most (29) did not require
oxygen, and many had no respiratory symptoms. Oliveira, director of
South Africa's Centre for Outbreak Response and Innovation, said:
[B.1.1.529 has an "unusual mutation population" of 50
mutations, found on the spike protein
32 mutations. According to National Public Radio, B.1.1.529 has
more than twice as many mutations as Delta. 】 The spike protein is
the part of the virus that most vaccines use to jump-start the immune
system against COVID-19, and it is also "the key that viruses use toopen the door into human cells."
"Researchers from the Medical Research Council of South Africa
and private Health insurer Discovery Health in South Africa said that,
compared with people who were not vaccinated against COVID-19,
the completion of Pfizer vaccination provided 33% immune protection
against the Omicron strain and 70% protection against the
development of severe disease after infection. The Pfizer vaccine was
93% effective against severe illness during the spread of the Delta
strain of the novel coronavirus mutation in South Africa. The Pfizer
vaccine is the most widely administered vaccine in South Africa. The
findings have not yet been peer-reviewed."
- The reason is very simple: "Omikron" is completely in South
Africa's soil natural variation, the environment determines the
variation - this must be from the "species restriction mechanism" the
overall basic theory of life to study, analysis, find answers, crack!
This is called "one side soil and water to nourish one side
virus"...... By October 2022, Omicron strains were still mutating, and
several variants such as Omicron B.7, BQ.1/BQ.1.1 and XBB appeared
in Asia, Japan and South Korea and spread globally. The "expansion
competition" among different variants were all from the novel
coronavirus (specific) variant strains, showing increasingly weak
toxicity, like a common cold. The average incubation period is 3-4 days
and the longest is 14-21 days. The poison spread of the disease and
stronger than Delta mutant strains, concealment of it at a higher
position affects the respiratory tract, viral replication faster (spread
fast toxicity weak), so the infection of the lungs influence degree is
lower, so the symptoms like a lighter for a cold like this - the dense
gram si according to the variation development bottom go to, another
two months to the end, According to the law of mysterious
disappearance and the Great epidemic only three (years)! In January
and February of 2023, the new coronavirus is bound to "mysteriously
disappear" like a cold virus through continuous mutation. It's the rule!
It's the law!
For more than 3,000 years, countless viruses have harmed
human beings and caused great disasters, but every major plague
virus
The law of mysterious Disappearance.
The "law of mysterious disappearance" is an unwritten law, a law,and is proven by 5,000 years of global history of sudden plague:
In 431 BC, the Black Death broke out in Ancient Greece. (Rat
fleas caused bubonic plague through the skin of humans and
pneumonia-pneumonic plague through the respiratory tract.) In 430
BC, Athens broke out in a large-scale epidemic, about a quarter of the
Athenians died, AD 541 to 542, the Byzantine Empire under the rule
of Emperor Justinian was once again by the Black Death (plague) city,
1347 to 1353, the Black Death outbreak again, known as: the
European Black Death; It took the lives of 25 million Europeans, a
third of the European population at the time.
The Black Death returned several times between 431 BC and
1353 BC, all strictly following the "Koch principle", completely a single
plague virus, no matter how much plague eventually "mysteriously
disappeared"! ...
From 164-180 AD, for example, the Antonine Empire suffered
outbreaks of typhoid fever, smallpox,
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 187
Measles, toxic shock syndrome, and so on, but each virus only
infects its own particular disease.
Dioca, a Roman historian, said that 2,000 people in Rome died of
the disease in one day, equivalent to a quarter of the infected people;
Miraculously, as soon as the plague passed, the virus suddenly
"mysteriously disappeared"!
We study the above plague, especially the "first wave" of the
1918 Great flu suddenly slowed down in July, and the sudden
"mysterious disappearance" of flu cases during the whole month of
August witnessed the turnaround of the "spring plague" to the
autumn epidemic. The virus then mutated to become the "Spanish
Lady Flu of 1918"! ... A month of leisure in August, and then the
"Spanish lady" pandemic in September, more crazy across Eurasia, the
United States and Africa, even the residents of permafrost are not
spared; The epidemic entered the late stage after two "summer
solstice", and in early spring February of the third year, it suddenly
"mysteriously disappeared" and was clean, and the virus has not
appeared again for a hundred years! - From the historical witness, we
found that "the sudden great plague generally but the third summersolstice (day) will suddenly" mysterious disappearance "- we call this
phenomenon the great plague virus" mysterious disappearance law "!
In 2003, China suddenly encountered SARS (Severe Acute
Respiratory Syndrome) plague epidemic in autumn 19 we found the
"mysterious disappearance law" diagram
The cycle of solar magnetic storms makes the virus "mysteriously
disappear" highlighting the big Bang of the universe
The eternal seal and proof of life
One billion years after the Big Bang cooled down, the sun
emerged, with an uninterrupted cycle of intense solar magnetic
storms, accompanied by strong radiation and a large number of
high-energy particles; The intensity of geomagnetic storms can be
used to characterize the influence of high-speed plasma clouds in
solar storms. The intensity level of geomagnetic storms is generally
divided by two types of geomagnetic indices, the Kp index and the Dst
index. Geomagnetic Kp=9 is a strong geomagnetic storm, sending a
red alert; Geomagnetic Kp>7 is a moderate geomagnetic storm, and
an orange alert is issued; Geomagnetic Kp>5 is a weak geomagnetic
storm, and a yellow warning is issued. Different levels of magnetic
storms have different effects on the human body, people in magnetic
storms will sudden blood pressure, headaches, cardiovascular
disorders and so on... The magnetic storm becomes aggressive to the
behavior of animals, such as mice will get angry for no reason,
desperately running around in the cage, and will not recover for a
long time; The microorganism is often the ultimate disaster, which can
destroy the molecular structure of the virus, completely break its
molecular chain, and fundamentally eliminate the virus - this is the
source of the world's many sudden great plague viruses that human
beings cannot eliminate but "mysteriously disappear" in the process
of solar magnetic storms.
The outbreak of the epidemic in 1918 - on March 4, 1918, a
military Camp located in the United States of Kansas (Camp Funston,
Kansas), but the symptoms at that time were only headaches, high
fever, muscle aches and loss of appetite. This was the beginning of the
first wave, and the war led to the second wave of infection. The third
and most violent wave came from Spain; The flu directly infected 1billion people worldwide and killed 50 to 100 million. The Spanish
Lady Flu ended in 1921, when the flu virus "mysteriously
disappeared" due to an X-rated solar magnetic storm.
(2) In December 2002, the outbreak of SARS virus plague in
Shenzhen, to October 2003, we predicted that SARS virus will
"mysteriously disappear" and rise to the theory, found "mysterious
disappearance law"; The reason is that the solar magnetic storm
broke out in October 2003, which proved that the solar magnetic
storm was the terminator of the SARS virus, and then "mysteriously
disappeared".
(3) In 2009, the outbreak of the A (H1N1) influenza virus in North
America, which rapidly swept the world within six months, was the
first public health emergency of international concern listed by the
World Health Organization after the promulgation of the International
Health Regulations (2005). As a result, the number of infected people
in 200 countries and regions around the world suddenly exceeded
10,000 in a month. Surprisingly, the virus lasted for a year before it
mysteriously disappeared - again due to solar magnetic storms: on
April 5 and August 4, 2010, two major solar magnetic storms broke
out, and the virus "mysterious disappearance" immediately declared
the end of the influenza pandemic.
4. At around 17:48 on December 30, 2019, Li Wenliang blew his
whistle: Seven cases of SARS (the origin of the novel coronavirus)
were confirmed in the fruit and seafood market in South China
isolated by the emergency department of our hospital. On March 9,
2020, the World Health Organization confirmed that the novel
coronavirus was a global pandemic, and the novel coronavirus
affected all countries and regions in the world at a time. More than
661 million people have been infected with COVID-19, and according
to the latest statistics from Johns Hopkins University, the global death
toll from COVID-19 has exceeded 1 million (as of September 2023);
Until February 2023, the novel coronavirus suddenly "mysteriously
disappeared" - within six days of the 2023 solar magnetic storm (1
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 189
From May 5 to 11), three consecutive flares of the largest
category (class X) of the sub-solar storm erupted, all of which werehigh
Two of them reached the highest level of X, killing the new
coronavirus and making the new coronavirus "mysteriously
disappear" in early spring and February 2023!
Chapter 20 "The Big Bang" The Force Reveals "Holistic Biology"
origin
The ancient Greek Plato predicted that the inference of "the
earth is a giant living organism" is that the universe is a super giant
living organism to highlight: the universe, the origin of all things on
Earth, a singularity big bang is the origin of "whole life science".
In this way, we can combine Hawking's Big Bang theory with the
whole life science of the big Bang to discuss the whole "origin" of life.
The whole life attribute of the universe is inseparable from the
large cosmic system and the small cosmic mechanism
Cut:
The Big Bang reveals:
The small universe system is trillions and trillions of cells
expanding;
The grand cosmic system is an expansion of everything.
...
The beginning of the Big Bang theory, 1974-1975, was the
beginning of Hawking's gravitational wave exploration to understand
the laws of quantum gravity, to understand deeply that these laws
reveal the nature of information and randomness in black holes, the
nature of the strange birth of the universe, and the nature of the
singularity within black holes - the beginning of the birth and death of
time.
July 11, 2022 Color image of the James Webb Space Telescope
proves the integrity of the Big Bang: "The stars in the galaxy are
moving, the galaxy itself is spinning, and the galaxy as a whole is
moving in space." This proves that the whole life science of the Big
Bang is completely the interaction between planets and galaxies, so
that the objective world of life in the universe and earth forms an
organic whole, and is in constant movement and change and
development!
We live in a universe governed by the laws of reason, andthrough science we can discover and understand these laws.
Since ancient Greece "the indivisibility of the organism had
struck Aristotle as a fundamental difficulty in assuming the finite
divisibility of matter; In this hypothesis, the atomist school seeks to
find an understanding of the order that governs the natural world - an
order that exists despite the diversity of physical phenomena."
In 1628, Harvey proposed that the small universe system and the
large universe system are inseparable, demonstrating the
inseparability of atomic processes represented by the universal action
quantum - "The inseparability of atomic processes represented by the
universal action quantum means that in quantum physics, this
interaction is an integral part of the phenomenon; If the instrument is
supposed to serve the purpose of determining the experimental
apparatus and recording the results of observations, this interaction
cannot be explained separately. Such recording, such as the spot
created by the collision of electrons on a photographic plate, involves
essentially irreversible processes; This situation does not make the
interpretation of the experiment special
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 191
Rather, it emphasizes the irreversibility which is implied in
principle by the very concept of observation."
The total amount of disorder or entropy in the universe always
increases over time. However, the law refers only to unordered totals.
The order of an object can increase as long as the amount of disorder
around it increases more.
That's what happens in living things. We can define life as an
ordered system that maintains its tendency to resist disorder and can
replicate itself. That is, it can make similar but independent ordered
systems. To accomplish this, the system must convert some ordered
form of energy, such as food, sunlight, or electricity, into disordered
energy in the form of heat. In this way, the system can satisfy the
requirement of an increase in the total quantity of disorder while
itself and its descendants increase in the quantity of order. The
evolution history of the whole life science of the universe, in which
human beings and animals live on negative entropy, is formed.
Two cosmological principles are closely related to the origin ofhuman life as a whole
Assuming that the large-scale universe is isotropic as viewed
from Earth, the cosmological principle can be derived from a simpler
Copernican principle. The Copernican principle states that there is no
preferred (or particular) observer or observation location. Based on
observations of the microwave background radiation, the
cosmological principle has been confirmedThe life blueprint of three
generations of DNA transmission implies that the cycle of life and
death cannot be ended
"DNA transmits the blueprint of life across generations.
Increasingly complex life forms take in information from sensors such
as the eyes and ears, process it in the brain or other systems, decide
how to act, and then export it to, say, muscles to act on the outside
world. At some point in the 13.8 billion year history of our universe, a
wonderful thing happened. This information processing becomes so
clever in order for life to gain consciousness. Our universe has now
woken up and is aware of itself. I consider it a triumph that we, who
are as small as stardust, have such a detailed understanding of the
universe in which we live "- that it has been confirmed that the
cosmic genetic code existed at the beginning of the Big Bang at some
time 13.8 billion years ago, and that the code" made life conscious ";
It also completely shows that the life of the big universe system and
the small universe system are homologous with the big Bang!
So what future behavior would the most likely history of the
universe have? There seem to be various possibilities compatible with
the emergence of intelligent life. They depend on the amount of
matter in the universe. If a certain critical mass is exceeded, the
gravitational pull between galaxies will slow down the expansion. If
the density of the universe falls below that threshold, gravity is too
weak to keep galaxies from flying away forever. All the stars would
burn out, and the universe would become emptier and colder. So,
everything is coming to an end again, but in a less dramatic way, and
we still have billions of years to go.
The Nature of the Expanding Universe by Stephen Hawking and
the Asteroid Threat
In the summer of 1982, the modern man Stephen Hawking and
John Gibbons held a conference on very early cosmology in
Cambridge. It was the most far-reaching meeting in the field. As earlyas the 1970s, Dick et al. pointed out that there are some serious
problems in the Big Bang universe model, such as the cosmic
microwave background causality problem, the monopole problem,
and especially the space flatness problem, which reflects the extreme
sensitivity of cosmic evolution to initial conditions. Gusse and Linde,
among others, argued that these problems could have been avoided if
the universe had expanded exponentially before the Big Bang, i.e., if
there had been an inflationary phase. However, since the mechanism
of inflation, or inflators, cannot be deduced from first principles,
many people are hesitant about this scenario, believing that it is only
a phenomenological model. However, an important development was
that Hawking et al. proposed that in the context of inflation, classical
randomness is quickly smoothed out by inflation, and that quantum
field fluctuations should be the seeds of cosmic structures, such as
galaxy clusters and galaxies. In fact, that's exactly the quantum
fluctuation that Hawking and Gibbons studied eight years ago when
they extended radiation from the black hole event horizon to the
cosmic event horizon. Ten years later, the Cosmic Background Explorer
satellite detected differences in the temperature of the microwave
background caused by this fluctuation in different directions. Later
observations by the WMAP and Planck satellites confirmed that it was
exactly the same as predicted.
"Asteroid collisions will be a threat that we cannot defend
against. However, the last such asteroid impact occurred about 66
million years ago and led to the extinction of the dinosaurs. The more
immediate danger is runaway climate change. Warmer ocean
temperatures melt ice caps and lead to massive carbon dioxide
releases. Both of these effects can make our climate like Venus, but at
250 degrees Celsius."
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 193
Five quantum fluctuations of the universe and the seed of life
"point" - the fertilized egg
In early 1982, the modern Stephen Hawking wrote a paper
suggesting that these differences were due to quantum fluctuations
during inflation.
Quantum fluctuations occur as a result of the uncertaintyprinciple. Moreover, these fluctuations are the seeds that form the
stars, stars, and us in the universe. This idea is basically the same
Hawking radiation mechanism that I predicted a decade ago coming
from the black hole's event horizon, except now it's coming from the
cosmic event horizon. The cosmic horizon is the surface that
separates the parts of the universe we can see from the parts we
can't. That summer we held a workshop in Cambridge attended by all
the leading experts in the field. At this meeting, we built most of the
existing picture of inflation, including the most important density
fluctuations that cause galaxies to form and thus our existence.
Several people contributed to the final answer. This was a decade
before the fluctuations in the cosmic microbackground were
discovered by the COBE satellite in 1993, showing that theory was far
ahead of experiment.
"Waves are the seeds that form galaxies, stars and us in the
universe" - "seeds" being a whole concept. The seeds of plants and
the sperms and eggs of animals are entirely quantum fluctuations in
the overall reproduction of life in the universe.
The totality of life in the Universe God really is rolling the dice
(Einstein was wrong)
Ten years later, in 2003, cosmology became an exact science, and
the WMAP satellite got its first results. WMAP has produced a
fascinating sky map of the temperature of the cosmic microwave
background sky dome, a snapshot of the universe when it was about
a ten-thousandth of its current age. The randomness you see is
predicted by inflation, and they mean that some regions of the
universe are slightly denser than others. The gravitational attraction
of the extra density slowed the expansion of the region and
eventually caused it to collapse to form galaxies and stars. So take a
closer look at the microwave sky map, which is the blueprint for all
the structures in the universe. We are the product of quantum
fluctuations in the very early universe. God does play dice.
Today we have the Planck satellite, which goes beyond WMAP to
get a much higher resolution map of the universe. Planck is seriously
testing our theory and may even detect the imprint of gravitational
waves predicted by inflation. It would be the mark of quantum gravity
across the firmament -- God does not throw dice; Einstein was wrong!
The King of the infinite space of the seven Universes The futureof the Greatest Treatise The Big Bang of the Greeks
The beginning of the universe itself in the hot Big Bang was the
ultimate high-energy laboratory for testing M-theory, and ideas about
the building blocks of space-time and matter. Different theories leave
different fingerprints on the current structure of the universe, and
astrophysical data can give us clues to unify all the forces of nature. So
there may well be other universes out there, but unfortunately we'll
never be able to explore them.
So what future behavior would the most likely history of the
universe have? There seem to be various possibilities compatible with
the emergence of intelligent life. They depend on the amount of
matter in the universe. If a certain critical mass is exceeded, the
gravitational pull between galaxies will slow down the expansion. If
the density of the universe is below the critical value, gravity
Too weak to stop the galaxy from flying away forever. All the stars
will burn out, and the universe will become bigger and bigger
The nothier, the colder. So, everything is coming to an end again,
but in a less dramatic way, and we still have billions of years to go.
In this answer, I try to explain something about the origin, future,
and nature of our universe. The universe in the past was small and
dense, so it was a lot like the nutshell I started with. Yet this shell
encodes everything that happens in real time. So Hamlet was
absolutely right. We can be trapped in a nutshell, but see ourselves as
the Kings of infinite space. So the future of Ptolemy's Treatise on the
Greatest could be the Big Bang of the Greeks!
The expansion and end of life in the universe
Hawking said, I want to speculate a little bit about the
development of life in the universe, especially intelligent life. I will
include man here, though much of his behavior throughout history
has been rather foolish, with no regard for the survival of other
species. The two questions I'm going to talk about are, "What is the
probability that there is life elsewhere in the universe?" "How might
life develop in the future?"
It is a common experience that things become more chaotic and
chaotic over time. This observation even has its own law, the so-called
second law of thermodynamics. This law says that the total amount of
disorder or entropy in the universe always increases with time.However, the law refers only to the total amount of disorder. The
order of an object can increase as long as the amount of disorder
around it increases more.
That's what happens in living things. We can define life as an
ordered system that maintains its tendency to resist disorder and can
replicate itself. That is, it can make similar but independent ordered
systems. To accomplish this, the system must convert some ordered
form of energy, such as food, sunlight, or electricity, into disordered
energy in the form of heat. In this way, the system can satisfy the
requirement of an increase in the total quantity of disorder while
itself and its descendants increase in the quantity of order.
Eventually they will start to attract each other and will come
together in one big squeeze. This will be the end of the history of the
universe in real time.
-- This chapter is taken from Hawking's "Ten Questions
Meditations" 9 How big is the universe's Big Bang territory
How big is the universe, Earth, planets, nebulae, extragalactic
stars from the Big Bang to the bottom of the universe?
On February 23, 1987, modern scientists observed a huge
explosion of a super new star 180,000 light-years from the Earth, the
surface temperature of the star was as high as 500,000 degrees, and
the speed of the star was sprayed into space at 30,000 kilometers per
second, producing huge light energy, the brightness of a galaxy for a
short time, and the brightness of more than 1-10 times that of the
sun.
In 1946, the Royal Radar Group in Malvern, England, found
strong radio sources in the constellation Cygnus, which led to the
discovery of quasars. The brightness of quasars is the sum of the
brightness of 1000 galaxies, each galaxy has 100 billion SUNS, solar
energy is nuclear, the brightness of quasars, can exceed 1000 galaxies
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 195
The sum of brightness, indicating that the quasar energy, far
more than nuclear energy, these alien energy into the solar system,
will naturally affect the Earth's climate change, but it is relatively
distant, very long, is not obvious - in the scope of time and space, the
scope of the universe is about 13.82 billion years multiple, Theuniverse has been changing dramatically since its birth, almost
without boundaries! Because humans can only observe the farthest
distance of more than 46 billion light years. Viewed from all directions,
the universe should be a sphere more than 92 billion light years
across."
On September 5, 1977, Voyager 1 was launched on its way out of
the solar system, passing Jupiter and Saturn... On February 14, 1990,
when Voyager 1 was 6.4 billion kilometers away from the Earth, the
command center on Earth operated Voyager 1 to take a set of photos
toward several planets in the solar system, and finally, under the
synthesis of the computer, gathered together a family photo of the
solar system, in this photo, It is difficult to find the Earth because it is
so far away, the Earth is only 0.12 points as big as a prime point. In
other words, Voyager 1 is 6.4 billion kilometers from Earth, but far
from leaving the solar system.
Astronomers believe that the structure of the universe larger
than the Milky Way is: galaxy groups. The Milky Way is in the local
group of galaxies, and there are about dozens of galaxies in the local
galaxy that belong to the same class as the Milky Way. Larger than the
local group of galaxies is the supergroup or supercluster, the local
galaxy is located in the Virgo supercluster, and the Milky Way galaxy
of the same level there are 47,000, the Milky Way root is a grain of
sand in the big universe, the Earth knowledge of the sand in the
foam! ...
In addition, due to the accelerating expansion of the universe
itself and the existence of "dark matter", the limit of the observable
universe is a spherical space with a diameter of 93 billion light years,
which we call the observable universe.
On December 18, 1995, the Hubble Space Telescope was used
for 10 days to expose the smallest region of the sky for 10 consecutive
days, and obtain more than 3,000 very distant galaxies, these galaxies
are like the Milky Way. The image is also named the Hubble Deep
Field. If it is true that 96 percent of the universe is "dark matter," the
observable universe is only 4 percent of the real universe.
Just how big was the Big Bang? The meaning is an era and the
concept of science and technology and future time - the universe in
1452 is in the Copernican universe principle, the universe in 1596 is in
Kepler's "The Mystery of the Universe" to restore the ultimate truthof cosmic harmony; In 1926, Hubble observed about a billion galaxies
similar to the Milky Way. According to the shape and structure can be
divided into: spiral galaxies, bar spiral galaxies, elliptical galaxies and
irregular galaxies, modern scientists believe that the total number of
extragalactic galaxies is more than 100 billion! ...
On February 14, 1990, Voyager 1 touched a distance of 6.4 billion
kilometers from Earth - meaning that the solar system is tiny in the
Milky Way, and the sun is located on one of the Milky Way's arms, the
Orion arm, at a distance of about 26,000 light-years from the center
of the Galactic River. The Milky Way is also known as "Silver Han"
(Tianhe, Milky Way, Star River, Tianhan, etc.) The bar spiral galaxy,
which contains 100 to 400 billion stars and a large number of star
clusters, nebulae, and various types of interstellar gas and interstellar
dust, appears silvery white around the sky from Earth
Girdle. With a total mass of about 210 billion times that of the
Sun, the Milky Way is part of the local Group of galaxies, which is
made up of three parts,
The central part of the nuclear sphere is 3,000 light-years in
diameter and ellipsoidal. The galactic disk is the main body of the
Milky Way, with a diameter of about 80,000 light years, a thickness of
about 10,000 light years in the center, and a thickness of about 3,000
to 6,000 light years at the edge. The nearest extragalactic galaxy is
Andromeda, which is 2.54 million light years away from the Milky Way.
The larger of these are the Large Magellanic Cloud and the Small
Magellanic Cloud;
The Milky Way galaxy is about 100,000 light years in diameter,
about 473 trillion kilometers, and if the gravitational influence is
calculated, the solar system has a radius of 2 light years (about 94,608
billion kilometers) and a diameter of 4 light years, 19 billion
kilometers. If we take Pluto's orbit as the boundary, the radius is 5.9
billion kilometers and the diameter is 11.8 billion kilometers (about
0.00025 light-years)...
Extragaline galaxy is the boundless universe, the nearest
extragaline galaxy is 42,000 light-years away from the Milky Way Canis
major dwarf galaxy - human "Traveler 1" flew 45 years to fly 23 billion
kilometers have not yet flown out of the solar system, need to fly
42,000 light years to touch the extragaline galaxy!!Ten Big Bang domains "Webb" is seen 7,600 light years from
Earth
"According to NASA's website, a total of five images have been
released to the public. This includes a spectrogram of the exoplanet
"WASP-96b" in the Milky Way, a planetary positionThe Big Bang
produced a lot of Force energy, and it also produced an equal amount
of negative energy
Left behind in the Earth's galaxy mysterious prowl
[The Big Bang produced a lot of positive energy, and it also
produced an equal amount of negative energy. In this way, positive
and negative always add up to zero. This is another law of nature.
So where is all this negative energy today? It's in the third
ingredient in our cosmic recipe: it's in space. It may sound strange,
but according to the natural laws of gravity and motion - some of the
oldest in science - space itself is a huge storehouse of negative energy,
enough to ensure that everything adds up to zero. 】 -- Stephen
Hawking, Reflections on Ten Questions
Ecological entropy is the balance of individual biological energy,
biological movement and environmental energy of the earth's
biological community or species. Ecological entropy is the Big Bang
(1011 seconds (104 years) after the Big Bang, the temperature is
about 105 Kelvin, the matter period. In the early history of the
universe, light dominated all forms of energy. As the universe
expanded, the wavelength of electromagnetic radiation was stretched,
and the corresponding photon energy decreased. The radiation
energy density decreases inversely with the product of scale (R) and
volume (4π r3/4), i.e., the amp 1/R4 decreases, while the energy
density of matter simply decreases inversely with volume by 1/R3.
After 10,000 years, the density of matter catches up with the
radiation density and exceeds it, and from then on, the universe and
its dynamics become dominated by matter. The concept of infinite
finite infinite set is left in the planetary system Earth's wide living
environment and the balance of energy (organic and inorganic energy)
absorbed, released and exchanged by biological populations,
individuals and corresponding environments and corresponding small
environments.
The regional ecological energy collection is represented by W:
W=W1+W2+W3...... +WN finite infinite infinite set number columns.W has the nature of the whole life science of the Big Bang, and
the "entropy" instinct of the distribution of bioenergy network in
accordance with the situation of living things, the latitude and
longitude of the earth. This is the concept of the Big Bang whole life
ecology W network.
Second, "Life lives on negative entropy"
Ecological entropy is created by Schrodinger in his book What Is
Life (first published in 1944). Schrodinger explains the nature of life
through thermodynamics and quantum mechanics theories, and
introduces concepts such as aperiodic crystals, negative entropy,
genetic code, quantum transition mutation, etc., to explain the
material structure of organisms, the maintenance and continuation of
life, heredity and variation...
When can a piece of matter be said to be alive? The answer is
when it continues to "do something," move, exchange matter with
the environment, etc., and can be expected to "last" much longer
than inanimate matter under similar circumstances
When a living system is isolated or placed in a uniform
environment, due to the effects of various frictions,
All motion usually comes to a quick standstill; The difference in
electric or chemical potential disappears, as do the substances that
tend to form the compound, and the temperature becomes uniform
by heat conduction. After that, the whole system gradually declines
into a dead, inert mass, reaching a state of permanence in which
observable events no longer occur. Physicists refer to this state as
thermodynamic equilibrium or "maximum entropy." 】
Schrodinger goes on to argue: What, then, is there in our food
that is so precious that we are able to save ourselves from death? The
question is easy to answer. Every process, event, happening-whatever
you may call it-in short, everything that is happening in nature means
an increase in the entropy of the part of the world in which it is
happening. As a result, living organisms are constantly increasing their
entropy - or producing positive entropy, if you like - toward the
dangerous maximum entropy state, which is death. The only way to
escape death or to live is to absorb negative entropy from the
environment, which, as we will soon see, is a very positive thing. Or,
less paradoxically, the essence of metabolism is to enable theorganism to successfully eliminate all the entropy it had to produce
while alive.
What is entropy? Schrodinger said: (I mention the technical
definition of the term entropy only to dispel the mystery that often
surrounds it. What is more important for us here is the significance of
entropy for the statistical concepts of order and disorder, the
relationship between which has been revealed by Boltzmann and
Gibbs in statistical physics. This is also a precise quantitative
relationship, which can be expressed as:
Entropy is equal to klogD
Where k is the so-called Boltzmann constant (=3.2983×10-24 CAL
/ ° C) and D is a quantitative measure of the atomic disorder of the
relevant body. It is almost impossible to give a precise explanation of
the quantity D in short, non-technical terms. The disorder it
represents is partly the disorder of thermal motion, and partly the
disorder of different kinds of atoms or molecules that are mixed with
the machine rather than clearly separated, such as sugar and
moisture in the example cited above. This example is a good
illustration of the Boltzmann equation. The gradual "diffusion" of
sugar into all the water increases disorder D and thus entropy (since
the logarithm of D increases with D). It is also clear that the supply of
any heat increases the chaos of the thermal motion, that is, it
increases D, and thus entropy. Why is that? Take a look at the
following example to make this clear: When you melt a crystal, you
break the neat and persistent arrangement of atoms or molecules,
turning the lattice into a random distribution of continuous
changes. 】
Schrodinger's "negative entropy" summarizes the origin of
Fabre's ecological entropy in the Big Bang
Fabre ecological entropy said: "insects bury small pieces of dung,
and later a cluster of grass plants will grow green." A sheep came
through here and clipped the grass away. As a result, the hind legs of
the sheep grow meat, which is not what people want. The
coprovorous insect industry translates into a delicious bite of meat on
our forks."
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 201Schrodinger summarized the phenomenon of regional
equilibrium of Fabre's ecological energy: insect-small dung lump-a
cluster of grasses
Sheep - mutton leg meat - coprovorous insect industry - we
human ecological entropy transfer phenomenon; Therefore, the chain
effect of increasing or decreasing biomass entropy is formed naturally,
which constitutes the principle of continuous turnaround of regional
ecological energy (entropy). This principle has its roots in the Big Bang
theory of whole life.
From the perspective of the Earth, if we take the equator as the
maximum basin diameter of the earth's ecological energy, the circular
latitude line from the equator to the North and South poles will
naturally form a two-way spiral (to the South Pole, to the North Pole),
and the singularity of the north and South poles as the spiral line
constitutes the regular arrangement of the regional entropy of the
infinite set of complex variable functions of the ecological entropy
distribution on the earth, geology and geography. Since ecological
entropy is composed of two different and related soft closed system
units, the infinite set of biological energy measures, ecological
entropy is the equilibrium formula of the dynamic equilibrium
distribution effect of the infinite finite and infinite set of dynamic
biological energy communities. In view of this, the birth of
Schrodinger's "life lives on negative entropy" law!
Modern scientists have discovered the principle that ecological
entropy changes with the latitude entropy of the earth
The recognition of this cyclogram of ecological energy was
discovered by the modern German doctor Mayr during a voyage in
1840. In that year Mayr, as the ship's doctor, took part in a ship's
voyage from Holland to the East Indies. During the long sea voyage
from Amsterdam at 53 degrees north through the English Channel
and across the tropics of the equator, Mayr noticed a marked change
in the color of the venous blood of sailors and sailors, which was
redder than it had been in Europe at the time of the voyage. At that
time, Mayer explained this phenomenon from the research window
of energy conservation and energy transformation. He believed that
the red blood of sailors and sailors at the equator was due to the
increase of oxygen in the blood. In the tropical high temperature
(equatorial) environment, sailors and sailors only need to absorb lessheat in the food, so that more oxygen is trapped in the blood. It is
concluded that the energy of human body heat and muscle
mechanical work comes from the same chemical energy of food, and
the mechanical energy, thermal energy and chemical energy are
equivalent and can be transformed into each other. Meier had
actually discovered the law of ecological energy spirals. The red color
of the blood of the crew and sailors follows the law of the spiral
change of the ecological energy entropy of the blood from 90 to 50 to
0 degrees north latitude (equator). Meier used the human vein blood
to change the red color of the blood with the spiral ecological energy
entropy, and has found the principle of ecological energy (entropy) -
the negative entropy changes with the latitude.
Therefore, the ecological difference produced by this ecological
energy principle is a natural phenomenon that can be seen
everywhere, which proves that the law of "life lives by negative
entropy" and the symbiotic property of the earth.
Human April Fangfei, mountain temple peach blossom begins to
bloom
Bai Juyi, a great poet in the ancient Tang Dynasty, was the
earliest to understand and scientifically describe the difference of
ecological entropy in the sphere. He has such a famous sentence in
"Tour Dalin Temple";
"The world in April, the temple peach blossom began to bloom."
Three hundred years later, Shen Kuo, a great scientist in the Song
Dynasty, repeatedly intoned this sentence, especially in April, he went
to a mountain on the outskirts of Quanzhou for field investigation,
and indeed saw the strange ecology of cross-flower blooming. Shen
Kuo figured out that the temperature scissors difference between
ecological energy mountains and mountains is the reason for this
natural phenomenon, and explained it scientifically with the principle
of ecological energy
Bai Juyi describes the strange natural phenomena of nature
ecology.
The story of ecological entropy spread earlier is the natural
phenomenon of "mantis hunting cicadas and yellow sparrow behind"
that King Wu saw in the imperial garden during the Spring and
Autumn Period and the Warring States Period.Another thousands of years of Chinese popular proverb: "big fish
eat small fish, small fish eat shrimp, shrimp eat grass mud" more
profoundly elaborated the 1935 British ecologist Tanslie put forward
the theory of ecosystem, and then the ecosystem or plant community
"entropy" balance or related balance state...
Modern American biologist Lindemann put forward the concept
of biological chain. Although this theory of ecosystem and biological
chain expresses the concept of ubiquitous micro-ecosystem, which
maintains the relative balance between global ecological entropy and
small environmental entropy, and the interdependent cycle of
biological species and environment in nature, the struggle for survival,
and mutual regulation in natural selection.
Applying quantum mechanics to quantitatively analyze entropy
from the Big Bang
Ecological entropy "cradle" - "If you put a grain of sand at the tip
of your finger at arm's length, this is part of the universe you are
looking at - but a tiny dot in the universe." -- NASA Administrator Bill
Nelson said this when introducing the first full-color deep space
image of the universe taken by the Webb Space Telescope on the 11th.
In other words, a telescope looking at this region of the universe is
equivalent to looking at a grain of sand on our fingertips.
The "one grain of sand" principle also reveals the "entropy
principle"! As Schrodinger put it, "The non-physicist finds it hard to
believe that the everyday laws of physics, which he regards as a
model of high precision, are based on the statistical tendency of
matter to move towards disorder." I gave you an example in chapter
one. The general principle involved is the famous second law of
thermodynamics (the entropy principle) and its equally famous
statistical basis."
From 2000 years ago, people recognized Shen Kuo's April
Mountain Temple from the ecological phenomenon of cicadas,
mantises and yellow finches, to Darwin's cat, mouse, bee, grass, cow,
and human quasi-ecological energy principle, and then from Fabre
(Fabre said: "insects bury small dung patches, and in the future there
will be a cluster of grass plants so that they grow green." A sheep
came through here and clipped the grass away. As a result, the hind
legs of the sheep grow meat, which is not what people want. The
coprophagous insect industry ultimately translates into a deliciousbite of meat on our forks." To Maier's equatorial rotation, to Steinlie's
ecosystem and Lindemann's biological chain... They're all related to
the whole biology of the big Bang; The macroscopical natural
selection of whole species and living individuals and the phenomenon
of struggle for survival are the community system or the ecological
entropy distribution theory of biological region. The expression of
ecological entropy is only a macroscopic chain phenomenon of food
or nutrients, emphasizing the relative balance maintained by the food
entropy energy flow and material circulation of the ecosystem, which
is a dynamic correlation between various biological members
(individuals) and the environment in which they are absorbed and the
ability to self-maintain "biological entropy" regulation and control. In
fact, the "ecological entropy" originated in the "cradle" of the Big
Bang - the image provided by the Webb Space Telescope has 150
million pixels and provides rich details of this compact group of
galaxies. "The gravitational interaction between the four neighboring
galaxies causes gas and dust from the interior of the galaxy to be
thrown out of the local galaxy, and the disturbed gas and dust is also
the cradle of star formation."
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 203
The "ecological entropy" of the galaxy is driven by the whole
"entropy" force of the Big Bang without interruption
Continued expansion and retention
The expression of ecological entropy cannot leave the wholeness
of the "entropy" of the universe and the earth's biological species and
individuals and the global galaxy. Because the biological chain is only
a kind of individual and community ecological entropy sphere balance
phenomenon, the cause of the formation of this phenomenon lies in
the universe Big Bang "entropy" force retention, and "entropy"
sphere universal distribution principle, and the big Bang galaxy
geographical ecological spiral network of the internal correlation law
of balance.
The essence of ecological entropy theory not only emphasizes
the integrity of the system, but uses the whole (biological) individual
as the element of the system, and only gives a broad description of
the chain (food) of the overall concept of the two or moreinterrelated elements. It does not unify the energy (entropy) of the
mutual variation of the system (DNA, cells, organs, and tissues) of any
living thing individual, life, ecology, and its complex systematic state
changes and dynamic state changes, and goes deep into the laws of
the whole life science and energy microcycle of the Big Bang.
The objective observation of the universe has been proved by
the Webb Space Telescope's color images - life itself is a complex
whole system, and each living individual is a complex system-level
(DNA, cells, organs, tissues, individuals) system. The "entropy" level of
the species community composed of such a life state change system is
more complex, and the change mechanism of the specific structure
energy movement state of organisms is only reflected by organisms or
communities as system elements, obviously ignoring the "system"
and "system" of the cosmic energy microcycle and biotype nuclear
reactions. This "system" and "unity" network is the continuation of
the microscopic ecological entropy of individual organisms. Harvey
found that human capillaries make the blood circulation
micronetwork become a network state and an endless
microcirculation mechanism. It is the entropy of the big Bang that
maintains the balance of the small universe system's spiral ecological
entropy network - this is the "negative entropy" of the big Bang's
initial "force" that quietly and universally exists in the universe galaxy
Earth as "atoms" (energy)!
Chapter 22, "Fossil" is the origin of life in the Big Bang overall life
science Earth biological rings "time window" artificial fake fossil chain
must be completely eliminated
The whole life theory of the Big Bang subverts the science of
ancient Greece for 3,000 yearsIt was one of the greatest progressive
transformations that mankind has ever experienced, a time that
needed and produced giants, giants of thought and passion and
character, giants of versatility and learning. The people who laid the
foundation for the modern rule of the bourgeoisie never had civic
limitations. On the contrary, these characters embody, to varying
degrees, that kind of risk-taking characteristic of The Times." - See?
The 21st century is another great human science "that kind of
adventurous characteristics of The Times." Here we go! She willsubdue almost all scientific theoretical principles of the past 3,000
years from ancient Greece to the 20th century - in particular, the
scientific theoretical principles generated by the research of Galileo's
"experimental science" and artificial selection of "tempering method"
and the unnatural fact explanation and interpretation that do not
conform to the real existence of the Big Bang of nature!
For those very long time span "prehistoric civilization",
archaeology, fossil theory, paleontology and so on... In particular,
Darwin's "Origin of Species" theory of evolution invented the false
theory that humans evolved from ancient apes; About 35 million
years ago, humans began to migrate and transform, and the so-called
theory that dryopithecus and Australopithecus are both considered to
be the ancestors of humans "monkey into man" will be thoroughly
liquidated with the greatest "that kind of adventurous era
characteristic"! - Return to the scientific track of "Big Bang whole life
science".
As Schrodinger integrated physics and quantum mechanics into
the science of life in the universe, "Only universality is the only thing
that can be scored full marks." But the expansion in the breadth and
depth of the various branches of knowledge over the last 100 years
has presented us with a strange dilemma. It is clear to us, on the one
hand, that we are only at the beginning of the process of obtaining
certain reliable sources for the synthesis of all known knowledge into
a unified whole; On the other hand, however, it is no longer possible
for a man to command more than a narrow field of expertise." -
Preface, What Is Life? By Schrodinger; This is the scientific history of
the 21st century that integrates the whole life science of the Big Bang
into a unified whole.
In particular, on July 11, 2022, the 6-color image of the James
Webb Space Telescope was released to fully prove the integrity of the
Big Bang, saying: "The stars in the galaxy are moving, the galaxy itself
has rotation, and the galaxy as a whole is also moving in space." This
proves that the whole life science of the Big Bang is completely the
interaction between planets and galaxies, so that the objective world
of life in the universe and earth forms an organic whole, and is in
constant movement and change and development!
She will change and subvert the scientific theories of the past
5000 years of ancient Greece to the present, the first is the "fossiltheory"!
Second, the artificial nature of the Earth's fossil chain deviates
from the whole life science of the Big Bang
Brief description of human fossil discovery:
In 1911 and 1913, the modern German archaeologist Hans Reck
made important discoveries in the non-Olduvai Gorge;
In 2000, French scientist Pickford found two mandible remains,
three femurs, and one humerus in the Tugen mountains of central
Kenya for five individual fossils, as the hominid system, 6 million years
ago named the generation of the image - the original human Tugen
species.
In July 2001, the British "Nature" magazine published new
findings and the South? The ape-like Ardipithecus ancestor species
appeared between 5.8 million and 5.2 million years ago in the Middle
Awash region of northeastern Siberia.
In 2002, French scientist Brunay, in the desert region of northern
Chad, Central Africa, found that the Tomai people - the hope of life
(the earliest hominids after the separation of humans) date to 7
million to 6 million years.
So paleoanthropologists, who consider themselves pioneers of
paleontology, paint a timeline of human evolution (the
anthropogenetic fossil chain) and the separation of apes, namely:
Anthropoid -- anthropoid -- Ardipithecus -- upright --? Ape --
Brick man -- Homo erectus -- Homo sapiens -- modern man.
This is a remarkable man-made "fossil chain", because it has
nothing to do with the whole life science of the Big Bang and the age
of the Earth; The only point of the "fossil chain" is the Darwinian
theory of evolution "from ape to man"! The most typical are:
Modern Lewis Leakey three generations (three generations of
the Leakey family comprise:
Louis Leakey (1903-1972) and Marry Leakey (1913-1996) and
their son Richard Leakey and daughter-in-law Meave Leakey.) Fossils
found in three generations of Leakey:
1. One day in 1959, while Leakey was staying at the camp with a
fever, Mary went alone to the FLK to search for fossils and found a
jawbone with teeth. After a brief cleaning, she was pleasantly
surprised to find that the jawbone with teeth was quite old. TheLeakeys called him "Dear boy."
2. In 1961, Leakey and Mary's son discovered another ancient
fossil in Olduvai Canyon and named it Homo habilis.
3. In 1964, Lewis found the stone remains of the modern human
race - "Sensitive man".
4. In 1978, Mary discovered 3.5 to 3.8 million years old hominid
footprints in Ratolli (located in Tanzania), which were represented by
the anthropologist Donald Johnson who had discovered Lucy, the
Australopithecus, in Ethiopia four years earlier.
5. Leakey's son, Richard Leakey, and his wife, Meave Leakey,
discovered a large number of hominid fossils around Lake Turkana in
northern Kenya.
6. Leakey's granddaughter, Louise Leakey, discovered the Kenyan
plain face
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 207
(Kenyanthropus platyops) fossil. -- The fossils are 1.75 million
years old
3.5 to 3.8 million years of primitive footprints vary in age... It is
not a "fossil chain" of natural systems. From 1.75 million years ago to
3.5 to 3.8 million years ago and the 13.8 billion years of the Big Bang,
there is not enough time for sea and land changes in the cosmic
"timeline", and what are we talking about fossils?
Third, the niche "fossil chain" does not have any trace of the Big
Bang overall life science is entirely human
Fake "fossil chain"
In fact, "Homo sapiens - modern man" is completely a human
forged fossil chain of the earth, without the reality of the natural
system, and completely missing the early historical witness of the
whole life science of the Big Bang.
The main reasons are:
If there is a step of human evolution from Tomei to Homo
sapiens every one million years, and there is no evolution in the one
million years between the two steps, nature will not have a step of
evolution every one million years of equilibrium behavior that is
inconsistent with land and sea changes, especially the "Great
explosion".Second, Tomaiman, Anthropoid, Ardipithecus, Erectus,
Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo erectus, Homo sapiens,
modern humans, the naming of each evolutionary ladder anthropoid
is confused, and the concept of human or ape is unclear; It is
unknown at what stage the apes separated? Seven to six million years
were humans, five to three million years were apes, and in 2003, one
million years were humans again! ... The exact impression is that man
has become ape and man again. Is there such a million years "sea and
land changes" the big Bang frequency of the universe? ?
Fossils can be pieced together to create seven evolutionary
ladders over a period of seven million years
The fossils representing the seven steps of evolution produced
over the course of seven million years are broken, fought up by
several individuals at different locations, and the status of the fossils
has been debated since their discovery. Is it man? There is no
conclusive and complete evidence for apes to rely on, and it is
completely pieced together with broken fossils in different areas at
random!
According to Richard Leakey's conclusion, this line of ape man
migration, like "East Africans", should be an extinct race; Therefore,
the position of Homo erectus in the timetable given by
paleoanthropologists is completely a blank spot, because East African
and Peking man are the only representatives of Homo erectus, when
the representatives of these two evolutionary steps are extinct
naturally no descendants continue, this fossil ring schedule should be
changed to Homo sapiens - modern humans, if there is no upright
mark from ape to man! ? A monkey would never have evolved into a
modern man without standing up.
5. If the liberation of the human hand and arm and the stable
uprightness of the human body are beneficial changes - then I see no
reason to deny that it would be more beneficial to the evolution of
modern man if uprightness or bipedalism, which values survival, could
be further developed! Otherwise, the hands and arms are habitually
free to move and support the weight of the body - specially designed
for climbing, the hands and arms are not perfect enough to make
weapons, and throwing stones and spears with power is all in vain
without standing upright.
Conclusion: Niche's first stage of upright walking and secondstage of adaptive attachment - this man-made fossil chain of the Earth
is completely inconsistent with the overall biological evolutionary ring
of the Big Bang, and even more inconsistent with the Cambrian
"explosion" of life!
Fourth, the "fossil chain" is based on the wrong Darwinian
theory of evolution, and there are too many human imagination and
non-scientific traces
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, On the
Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection, On the Origin of
Species by means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of
Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life). The Linnean Society sees
itself as the biological work of Charles Darwin, the British biologist
who laid out the foundations of biological evolution. It was published
in London on 24 November 1859.
Seventy-one years later, in 1930, Leakey completed his doctorate,
and in 1931, encouraged by Darwin, he went to the Olduvai Gorge in
East Africa for extensive fieldwork - that is, Leakey began fossil
archaeology 72 years after Darwin. But the three generations of
scientific archaeology is completely based on Darwinian evolution;
With too much Darwinian assumptions, completely deviated from the
modern classic genetics - Mendel published the three Laws of
Genetics in 1865, and Mendel's research results were summarized
into a paper published in the Experiment of Plant Hybridization, which
failed to attract the mainstream attention of the academic community
at that time; In 1900, de Vries from the Netherlands, Korens from
Germany, and Czermak from Austria simultaneously and
independently "rediscovered" Mendelian laws of inheritance. There's
no way a niche who went to Africa in 1931 didn't know a little bit
about it! ?
In fact, gene paralleling runs counter to classical Darwinian
evolution. The evolution of life is not linear, but a non-linear
explosion.
Darwin's biological evolution believes that biological evolution
has experienced a long evolution process from aquatic to terrestrial,
from simple to complex, from low to high, and this process is
gradually realized through natural selection and genetic variation.
Darwin's long and slow evolution is fundamentally challenged byscientific theory and recent discoveries in paleontology and
anthropology.
V. Darwin's theory of evolution completely deviates from the
Ediacara-Chengjiang-Burgess 3 fauna (s
The whole abrupt evolution of fossils
From the perspective of life on Earth, especially from the
window frame of the human species, life bursts are often accidental
biological events. This is from the 505 million year old Canadian
Burgess Biota, located in British Columbia, Canada, about 505 million
years ago in the Middle Cambrian era, about 119 genera and 140
species of Marine animals, found arthropod dominant populations,
Then there are the soft-bodied deep-sea fossils of sponges, worms,
brachiopods, echinoderms, chordates, etc. - and so the modern man
Wilcutt pushes the origin of life back half a billion years.
In modern China, in the 20th century, "Chengjiang Biota" was
first discovered in Chengjiang County, Yunnan Province, on July 1,
1984. This multi-phyla zoological group has many animal types, and it
is very rare to preserve animal mollusc structures, which for the first
time vividly reproduces the magnificent landscape of ancient Marine
life and the original characteristics of modern animals. The abundant
biological information provides direct evidence for the study of
"Cambrian explosion".
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 209
Actions speak louder than words! The Burgess Biota in Canada
and the Cambrian Explosion in Yunnan completely subvert Darwin's
bottom-up upside-down evolutionary model and provide fossil
evidence for the top-down explosive model. And shows the
Ediacara-Chengjiang-Burgess three animal groups of the overall
evolution of the "explosion of life" clear vein!
6. The Nichian-made second stage fossil chain is not at all
Linnaeus' natural system
Modern paleontologists generally believe that human civilization
is only 5,000 years old, but the earth has existed for more than 5
billion years, so this more than 5 billion years, the earth and what
happened to the cycle of change?The overall evolution of the Ediacara-Chengjiang-Burgess
"explosion of life" among the three faunas has a clear "intermittent
balance".
Punctuated equilibrium completely reverses Darwin's and
neo-Darwinians' emphasis on "a slow process of continuous gradual
accumulation"; It is the sudden alternation of long periods of stability
(or even constancy) with short periods of dramatic change that
explain the many gaps left in the geological record. In view of this, the
Niche family "fossil chain" naturally exists too much artificial color.
Three generations of the Leakey family, known as the "first family
of paleoanthropological research", created the "three-stage" fossil
chain, which also deviated from the "intermittent equilibrium" and
the third stage of Leakey is even more inconsistent with modern
genetics, modern scientists have shown that the human brain has not
changed significantly in the 1603-1607 million years until today. That
means the human brain reached its evolutionary limit 16.03 million
years ago. This is consistent with the above mentioned that human
beings had existed six complete graphic structures 5 million years ago,
and there are more examples to understand the high intelligence of
prehistoric human beings from the gene theory. In fact, the 25,000
human genes have been stable for more than 3 billion years without
change. The existence of Enterobacter intestinalis in humans dates
back 3 billion years and has not changedOver time, the brain gets
rounder.
In other words, it is consistent that human beings have existed
six complete graphic structures five million years ago, and there are
more examples of the high intelligence of prehistoric humans from
the perspective of genetic theory. In fact, the stability of human
25,000 genes has remained basically unchanged for more than three
billion years. The presence of Enterobacter intestinalis in humans has
not changed since 3 billion years ago, confirming that "while the size
and proportions of the skulls of children in Homo sapiens 160,000
years ago were largely comparable to those of children today, the
skulls of adults at that time were significantly different from those of
modern adults, with longer faces and more distinctive features." No
significant changes to the skull.
In short, today's modern humans must jump out of the
misunderstanding of Haeckel's "ape man", stand at the height of thehistory of the Big Bang, cross the theoretical authority of the classic
four-stage theory of human origin, and introduce the theory of the
whole life of the big Bang in order to truly open the "whole life" of the
21st century in line with the history of the big Bang!
5, 000 Years of paleontology will never find Haeckel's "ape Man"
In 1889, after studying Neanderthal fossils, Haeckel believed that
there was a transitional stage between apes and humans, and the
organism in this transitional stage was named Pithecanthropus; Three
years later, Dubois (1858-1940), a Dutch military doctor, based on
Haeckel's ideas, discovered the famous Pithecanthropus Javanicus in
Java, according to history: "Fossil of Pithecanthropus erectus."
In 1894, Dubois published a formal academic paper suggesting
that Javanese ape-man was the ancestor of modern humans. In fact,
the German biologist Haeckel was the first to propose the term ape
man, is a loyal follower of Darwin's theory of evolution, and therefore
believes that the ancestor of human beings is a transition type
between apes and modern humans, which is completely pieced
together and fabricated "Homo erectus" fossil. 133 (2022-1889) After
the passage of paleontological history, no one has found Haeckel's
"ape-man" fossil, let alone any subsequent fossils of "Homo erectus".
You'll never find it.
Man is man, man from birth forever and ever! "Dragon born,
dragon born, phoenix born, mice born to make holes." People are
people! People can't be monkeys! Monkeys can't be people! In the
new era of the whole life science of the Big Bang, Haeckel's "ape
man" fossil will never appear, along with Darwin's invented evolution
is completely subvert, and will always be nailed in the column of
shame and materialism in the history of science! ...
Nine, the mysterious "walnut clamp man" can not change the
whole life suddenly burst "intermittent balance"
Catastrophe theory
On July 17, 1959, modern Mary Leakey discovered a rough shape
at the location of the East African Canyon
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 211
The skull and a lower leg bone of Australopithecus, named
Northeaster Bao, she thought were common rough-water typesFangithecus, and named "walnut clamp man"; The reason for the
name is that the fossil jaw is thick, shaped like a pincer crushing a
peach, and the age is determined by potassium-hydrogen method 1.8
million years ago, which is characterized as Australopithecus. This is
the new breakthrough that the ancients took for granted.
The 1.8 million year existence history of Australopithecus and
the 505 million year time difference of the overall evolution of the
"explosion of life" between the three animal groups of the Cambrian
Ediacara-Chengjiang-Burgess is ten million, and the "intermittent
balance" of the explosion of life is not any evolutionary small at all. In
1.8 million years, a "peach pincher" popped up. And there were East
Africans in 1960? More than 6 meters below the upper boundary of
the strata near the bone excavation site, it was found that the skull
(roof) bone and mandible bone of a child and an adult bone and a
foot bone were not at the same level. A skull was found. In 1964, the
identification of these pieced together fossils named "Homo habilis",
from the brain volume calculation identified as "East African" more
progressive people, there is a contradiction in this, that is, the
ordinary Australopithecus coarse type also called "East African", is
confused between human and ape; Habilis is considered to be more
progressive than East African because it has a larger brain than Nipper
Man. What if Australopithecus, which turns the word East African into
an equal sign, is Habilis an ape or a human? Full of loopholes...
Mysterious "walnut pincer man" can't change life Suddenly burst
"interrupted balance"
10. Leakey's "East African" can become "Australopithecus
Baumi" and Leakey's fossil is like that
You can change and fake
In 1976, Leakey's "East African man" first of all, it is difficult to
understand that the "East African man" discovered in Odujai, Tanzania,
was later changed to the ancestor and opithecine of Australopithecus
Baoui, and this name change further proves the fact that "East African
man" is an ape rather than a man. In 1976 Mary Leakey's team made
another discovery. The volcanic ash deposited about 4 million years
ago found members of the Hominids. Adults and children? The wide
footprints, it is said that the Leakey couple and their son Richard
Leakey, also found a well-preserved complete hominid fossil, in 1972
and found the number KNM-ER1470 skull fossil identified as "Homohability" class, from the time of about 2 million years can not be
"Homo erectus". At this point, archaeologists did not find Haeckel
"ape man" who is both human and ape. Africa cannot prove the
existence of anthropoid ancestors.
11, more than 100 years anthropologists in the map to the "ape
man" to the number (four stages)
Huxley's "Monkeys change men"
In 1975, the archaeological community made a major discovery,
the discovery of an "ancient tomb", it is estimated that some kind of
disaster event took the lives of 15 people, four of them children, the
rest are adults, the archaeological community called the "first family",
but can not prove the lineage between the 13 people, Johansen
analyzed the characteristics of the fossil attributed it to the Afarensis,
But so far there is no consensus, there are three different opinions: A
Australopithecus afarensis; B Australopithecus africanus; C Homo.
How can it become a scientific fact to prove the existence of ape man?
This reflects more than 100 years of anthropologists following the
map of the "ape man" matching (four stages) seat,
All suffer from a common paradox.
In fact, there are only three possibilities for "tomb land" fossils: A,
B, and C! In other words, a fossil group can only choose one of them,
because it can not be determined the true fossil age of the "tomb"
and the original face of man and ape, it can not be used to prove the
fact that Haeckel's "ape man" exists, let alone become conclusive
fossil evidence of the real existence of man or ape.
Modern paleoanthropologists from the beginning of fossil
discovery more than 300 years, is such a fierce debate, discoverers
themselves are often caprices, inconsistent, Bell said that the broken
fossils are not complete, the greater difficulty is that they do not
know their four stages to find "ape man" is the world does not exist at
all! What has never existed on Earth can only be a dream made up by
Haeckel and Dubois!
This is the case of fossil fraud, repeated, cannot become a
convincing scientific method (theory) cause.
12. The beginning and end of the modern Piltang fossil fraud
case
In 1859, Darwin's "Origin of Species" came out. Although variousdinosaur fossils were unearthed in the UK, there were no similar
ancient human fossils. It's an insult to Queen Victoria's glory days
In October 1907, Professor Otto Schutensacker of the University
of Heidelberg in Germany received a piece of skull found nearby,
which was identified as being more than 300,000 years old. The
discovery was an undisputed anthropological discovery at the time.
So. Britain and the rest of Europe are in a race to dig for ancient
human fossils - and the British Empire can't be left behind. ?
On January 18, 1912, the Geological Society of London held its
regular meeting. At the meeting, C. Dawson, a 48-year-old lawyer,
announced the discovery of an ancient human skull four years earlier,
in 1908; Sir A. S. Woodward, president of the Geological Society and
head of the British Museum's Geology Department, was keen to
announce at the meeting that the skull found at d Piltdown, near
Sussex, south of London, had been restored. The skull shows that it
was close to modern humans in more ways than just the occipital. Its
brain capacity is two-thirds of the modern, this skull became an
indispensable link in the evolution of humans from apes to modern
times...
This is the "Piltdown skull fossil" fake case that shocked the
world!
In 1915, the French paleoanthropologist M. Boule stated that
humans would not have such jaws, and should be orangutans.
American zoologist J. S. Miller also pointed out that the fossil jaw is
that of an orangutan.
In 1923, German anatomist Franz Wiedenlaich noted that the
skull came from three different species.
In 1953, K. Oakley et al. used a newly developed chemical
analysis method to examine the Piltdown skull again. Proving that
Char Dutson's skull is a complete fraud. The skull is a patchwork of
three different species. One is a medieval human skull, one is the jaw
of an orangutan that is only 500 years old, and one is the fossilized
teeth of an orangutan.
In 1996, important evidence of the fraud was found in old boxes
in the British Museum. According to Discovery
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 213The chest contained fossilized bones that had been soaked in an
acid solution to determine their age
Manganese and iron oxide treated. These are consistent with the
characteristics of the Piltdown's false skull.
In order to prove Darwin's theory of evolution, prove Huxley's
"from ape to man" "fossil missing ring", the British Geological Society
is not at risk of fraud, processing "Piltdown man skull fossil" shocking
false case, deceive the world, all mankind, but contrary to prove that
"people are not monkeys changed" paleontological conclusions!
13. Dubowa pieced together a fake "Homo erectus" scandal
Anthropologists can't find fossils of Homo sapiens or fossil
evidence of the transition between homo and Homo sapiens,
I began to work on the "Homo erectus" fossil abacus, hoping that
the dream would come true. Dubuwa looked for a breakthrough from
the characteristics of Homo erectus, hoping to achieve the missing
ring fossil testimony with Homo Haeckel; Here, Homo erectus from
Dubua is a representative of the post-Piltdown pseudofossils!
Dubwa, a young Dutch doctor who studied in Germany when he
was young, was particularly influenced by Darwin's theory of
evolution in Britain, and suddenly believed that the human Lord could
be found in Indonesia, so he went to Indonesia to find a good dream,
and inexplicably led 350 prisoners to search the banks of the Solo
River in Java. It is obviously a classic case of following the Darwinian
evolutionary diagram (four stages).
The fossil evidence for Homo erectus was pieced together by the
discovery and recovery of a jawbone at the site of Kaidenbrubus in
East Java in 1890, a cranium at the village of Trinier the following year,
and a thigh bone the following year. Dubwa took it for granted that
the skull and thigh bone were one, and published a paper in 1894,
thinking that he had found a fossil of Homo erectus, called "Homo
erectus"!
Unexpectedly triggered a fierce and huge debate in the
archaeological community, the focus of the debate: the pieced skull
and femur fossils (found in different places at different times of 1 year
apart) are apes? Are they still people?
Experts doubt that the thigh bone and skull belong to a human
species, but also feel that the geological age of the fossil is
questionable, and some even think that the bones are somedeformed products of modern humans. Paleontologists are
particularly skeptical about the geological age of fossils after
investigation, especially the patchwork of ape-man skull and human
femur bone combined into one, so that paleontologists can not
imagine that there is no scientific value... That is to say:
anthropologists generally do not recognize "Homo erectus", can not
be a fossil evidence of Haeckel Homo.
After 132 years, Dubois (1858-1940) died in 1940. So far, the
beginning age of "Homo erectus" has not been scientifically
confirmed, and the skull of Homo erectus and the thigh bone of
human are combined into one. This is another fossil puzzle and false
case since Piltdown fossil falsification; If we use the whole life science
of the big Bang to investigate the mystery of the fossil age of "Homo
erectus", it will inevitably bring about the "big Bang" of the
universe! ...
14. The flawed "fossil bones" and "Lucy" cannot prove that
"people are monkeys".
In October 1973, Johansen (an anthropologist at the Cleveland
Museum of Natural Science, Oklahoma, USA) found two fossil bones,
the lower end of the femur and the upper end of the tibia, of a knee
joint, at a site called Hada in the dry valley of the Arafa region of
Ethiopia, which were inferred from their shape and the way they
formed joints
The bone is the knee bone of a human ancestor, and since it is a
human bone, it has nothing to do with apes
The uprightness of the ilium was necessary and needed no proof;
From the geological time of 3.5 million years, it can not be the knee
bone of both human and ape, nor can it prove the real existence of
Haeckel "ape man".
In 1974, Johansen and French geologist Teiber made an
important discovery near the site where the knee bones were found,
unearthed the skeleton of a real person, a female, about 20 years old,
the cause of death is unknown, named "Lucy", because there is no
skull, the head character is unknown, and the shoulder is only
107-122 centimeters. Johansen's position that Lucy was both upright
and arboreal (arboreal is a fiction that has no scientific basis) places
her between modern chimpanzees and modern humans is hotlydebated among anthropologists, with Koppens-Tardy, Senu of the
University of Paris, and others disbelieving. On April 22-23, 1983, the
Institute of Human Studies in California held a symposium on "The
Evolution of Human Action" with Johnson White on one side and
Estes, Sussman and others on the other. At that time, the media in the
United States and the United Kingdom paid attention to it extensively,
and as a result, Leakey denied in the March 1983 issue of the
American Journal of Physical Anthropology that "Lucy" was an ape
between chimpanzees and modern humans. After a detailed analysis
of the shape of the "Lucy" hand bones to the foot bones, the scientific
conclusion was made that Lucy was Australopithecus afarensis,
although the two sides could not agree, but from the Johnson Cup
special explanation, Australopithecus more than 3 million years ago
was more like an ape, and it was more than 6 million years ago with
early humansAfter Piltdown, the fossil fraud scandal expanded in
global archaeology
In the 1980s, a young skull discovered by modern China in the
Xiaohe area of Yuanmou Basin was identified as a Ramapithecus type,
which was considered to be the ancestor of human beings. Later, it
was claimed that "stone tools" were also found in the strata, and it
was renamed "Butterfly Man", and its survival time was set at more
than 4 million years ago. And then constructed the "Kaiyuan
Ramapithecus" - "Lufeng Ramapithecus" - "butterfly Ramapithecus"
(or "butterfly man") - "Oriental" - Yuanmou man - Zhaotong man
(early representative of Homo sapiens) - Xichou man, Lijiang man (late
representative of Homo sapiens) and so on quite complete series. In
view of this, some people have proposed that the central Yunnan
Plateau and its adjacent areas are the key areas of human origin -
these so-called "quite complete series" as early as the late 1970s, the
archaeological community has found traces of counterfeit fossils in
Piltang: the so-called "stone tools" of "butterfly Man" were originally
natural stones; And the "Oriental" stone tools were later proved to be
picked up from the surface, and at a very late age! ... In view of this,
Lamapithecus is the distant ancestor of human beings and the
expansion of the fossil fraud scandal in the East after Piltdown, which
is sad...
16. In 1975, the dream of the fossil Australopithecus Afafa in the
tomb was brokenBasic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 215
In 1975, the archaeological community made a major discovery,
the discovery of an "ancient tomb", presumably some kind of disaster
The event claimed the lives of 15 people, four of them children
and the rest adults, in what is known in archaeology as the "first
family", but unable to prove the lineage between the 13 individuals,
Johansen analyzed the characteristics of the fossil and attributed it to
Afarensis, but there is no consensus so far, there are three different
opinions: A Australopithecus Afarensis; B Australopithecus africanus;
C Homo. How can it become a scientific fact to prove the existence of
ape man? This reflects the common phenomena and misdeeds
experienced by anthropologists in more than 100 years when they
took their seats according to the map of "ape Man" (four stages).
In fact, "Afa Cemetery" fossils, only A, B, C three possibilities! A
fossil group can only be one of the options, choosing one of the three
possibilities is a guessing puzzle, can not determine the true nature of
the "cemetery fossil", can not be used to prove the existence of
Haeckel's "ape man" fact, let alone become a conclusive "ape" fossil
evidence.
For more than 100 years, anthropologists have hotly debated
and debated... Even the discoverer himself is only capricious,
inconsistent, and anxious!
The greater difficulty is that they do not know that the "ape
man" they are looking for according to the four stages does not exist
in the world and has never existed, but Darwin and Huxley dream of
piecing together fossils in Haeckel and Dubwa, which does not exist in
ancient times!
17, Darwin's theory of evolution "from ape to man" cheating
crime source
Darwin wrote in The Descent of Man that "early human
ancestors may have had enormous canine teeth." But as they get
used to using stones, sticks and other weapons against their enemies
or opponents, they rarely use the upper jaw and teeth, so the upper
jaw and teeth become smaller."
Darwin emphasized in The Descent of Man: "If it was to the
advantage of man to free his hands and arms and to stand on his feetmore steadfastly, then surely it was to the advantage of the increasing
number of our ancestors who chose to walk upright on two feet." If
the hands and arms are only habitually used to support the whole
body or to climb trees, then they cannot perfect themselves, make
weapons or throw stones and spears purposefully." - This is the niche
stage 3 brain apparently getting bigger, exactly the same!
Darwin argued that these qualities are not unique to human
skills, that other species related to us also possess them, and that
they differ from us only in their degree of sophistication, not in their
absence.
Standing upright allows us to scan the savannah, find food more
easily, and throw projectiles with our free hands, just like humans. In
addition, due to the lack of human strength, fangs, claws, and armor
like skin, this will put themselves in a disadvantageous survival
dilemma. In order to survive, we have a smart brain, so that we can
develop a series of survival and development of the skills necessary to
survive and develop, to open up the Big Bang whole life science great
new era!
There are too many "speculations" + too many possibilities in
Darwin's "Origin of Species"
The ambiguity of possibility and possibility is intended to replace
the concept of anthropoid
In fact, the discussion of niche Stage IV Darwinian evolution is
not explicitly stated at all; The fourth stage of the niche is inevitably:
the development of language, thought, spirit, imagination, and skills
to modern people, which can be seen from Haeckel's "ape man" in
1860 and Huxley's "man is a monkey" theory, and 12 years later
Darwin proposed that "human beings originated from chimpanzees in
Africa" after a century and a half. If we move to the genetic stage, we
must develop a complete theory of human origin - in fact, from the
Origin of Species and The Descent of Man and Sexual Selection, we
see too much "speculation" and Darwin's use of too many possible
and possible ambiguous statements (this is the most taboo in
theoretical writing). The purpose of the period is to help Haeckel to
complete the "genealogical tree" of "from ape to man", to create the
fictitious "ape man" and "from ape to man", and then from "ape man
species" to "modern man" - to turn the monkey into the mostshameless human ancestor since the 18th century, which is Darwin's
"evolution" blasphemy against humanity's greatest sin!
In fact, after 173 years of rapid development of biological science
and quantum mechanics, especially the gene theory created by
Mendel and the wide application of Schrodinger's quantum
mechanics gene technology, standing in the historical height of the
new century to evaluate the subversion of the "monkey theory" has
long been suspected and abandoned by new scientific theories.
Modern anatomical research has proved that the human foot is
born to walk upright structure, the human body 206 bones can not be
because of evolution one more, can not be due to evolution one less;
The skeletal ratio of the human foot is completely according to the
law of gold division; It is completely a reasonable structure of the
most irrational irrational number, and the "golden section ratio" of
the human body can be proved from the famous human body
diagram of Da Vinci. That is to say, the human foot has never had a
climbing function, as Astordobo said: "The ox will not have tusks
when it has horns, and we cannot say that the horn of the ox is
evolved from the tusks." So, there is no niche phase 2 adaptation for
upright walking.
The third phase of the niche is even more inconsistent with
modern scientific research results, scientists have shown that the
human brain has not changed significantly between 1603 and 1607
until today, That is to say, 1.63 million years ago, the human brain has
reached the limit of evolution - which is consistent with the previous
mentioned that human beings have existed six complete graphic
structures by 5 million years ago; From the perspective of gene theory,
there are more examples of the high intelligence of prehistoric man.
In other words, the 25,000 human genes have been stable for more
than 3 billion years, basically unchanged. The existence of E. coli in
humans dates back 3 billion years and has not changed.
Genetic scientist Suwanji Aldridge stressed: "In fact, the
transmission of genes is nothing special, it has been around for
billions of years. Its ability to apply comes from human control over it,
not from evolutionary blindness."
In fact, gene paralleling runs counter to classical Darwinian
evolution. The evolution of life is not linear, it is non-linear. Darwin's
long, slow evolution is in conflict with scientific theories and newdiscoveries in paleontology. That is, life, especially human species,
erupts in window frames; This is proof of the Cambrian explosion of
life!
In 2022, humans got 17.3 billion years of precious information
from the Webb Space Telescope on "7.11" today,
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 217
We must re-examine the time window for the birth of the Earth
and the solar system, and completely abandon the 5 billion year time
limit for life on Earth,
Like Harvey's rejection of the wrong theory of blood movement,
the Theory of Blood Movement reveals that the "small universe
system" and "big universe system" of heart and blood circulation
correspond to the whole life science of the big Bang; Therefore, we
humans must completely overturn Darwinian evolution for it; It is also
not possible to use the "Niche four stages" and Dubwah to piece
together the fossil of "Homo erectus", and use the "monkey theory"
and the evolutionary speculation in the Origin of Species 150 years
ago to search for "Homo Haeckel" according to the map...
Let's take the English bishop Wilberforce's sarcastic remark that
Huxley was "a Sir Descended from monkeys..." Together with Darwin,
nail in the historical shame of "man is a monkey" and never turn over!
No different from distant primate relatives!
Nineteen, Darwin's theory of evolution with five facts sophistry
produced three inferences to establish a "from
Ape to Man "Scam of the century
The key to Darwin's theory is that five facts, sophists produce
three inferences, and establish that the great hoax of the "ape to
man" century can be stopped!
When the five facts of Darwin's theory contradict the three
inferences, it leaves five inexplicable gaps that render evolution
useless.
Let's make the following refutations to these five theoretical
gaps:
Five facts:
Fact 1. Exponential potential growth of the population
(hypergeometric progression of animal reproduction) (source: Paley,Malthus, and others).
Fact 2. Observed groups are existentially stable
(Source: can refer to the five years of observation in Belgrade).
Fact 3: Resources are limited (source: observation and emphasis
on population history in Malthus's The Theory of Population) Fact 4:
Individuals are unique (source: animal domesticators and taxonomists
such as Aristotle) Fact 5: Many individual variations are heritable
(source: animal refiners the first three chapters of the Origin of
Species).
Darwin used facts 1, 2, and 3 to draw inference 1 - there are
differences and survival struggles among individuals, and the scholar
who made the inference is Malthus), thus leaving the first theoretical
gap - the group is stable, that is, the species is unchanged and the
reasoning contradicts itself, forming the incompatibility of
evolutionary theory and facts.
Darwin also used the superposition of facts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to
draw a second inference - inference 2: survival difference, that is,
natural selection (the theory comes from Wallace and the inference
comes from "natural selection" was discovered by Wallace, concealing
the historical merit of scholar Wallace). Since fact 5 of the theory that
multi-individual variation is heritable variation is essentially
intraspecific variation, the inheritance of all organisms is inherited by
the traits of the individual species. This leaves a second theoretical
jump gap, and this gap builds on the first gap (species unchanged);
This gives rise to the confusion of the theory of natural selection,
which completely disproves the great hoax of the ape to Man century!
In fact, Darwinian theory of evolution breaks down on the basis of
endobiology
Phenomena expanding sublimation into the field of interspecific
biology produce conceptual misalignments and inversions.
Finally Darwin took facts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 plus inference 1, 2 to make
inference 3 - after many generations of evolution (Darwin, the
theorist who made the inference) to complete the refinement of
evolution, leaving a third theoretical gap - grafting Ryle's
geogradational homogeneic geological transplantation into the
biological category of the origin of species, This big jump in the theory
of inorganic to organic uniformization (Darwin's theory of evolution iscompletely based on Ryle's "uniformization" logic, but Ryle himself
cannot accept the ideological theory of biological "uniformization"
evolution. There were plenty of people familiar with the fossil
evidence who didn't accept evolution either.) Even Dahl was
ambiguous. Hence the irreconcilable contradiction between Inference
3 and Inference 1 - invariable species facts, resulting in cross-species
variation "homogenized" evolution, here Darwin believes that the
evolutionary facts that produce inference 3 are derived from fact 5,
completely artificial selection of animals, and there is no example of a
natural system. There is no fossil evidence (the Cambrian explosion of
life is a "mutation")! In fact, all the artificial (domestic) selection of
transcendental species, but also the variation of the same individual,
at best can only be artificial selection of variation, can not become an
evolutionary theory of example, let alone a historical evolution trend
formation theory, there is no historical fossils to become the basis for
argument, to achieve the exact scientific proof (the reason for the
existence of the problem, In Darwin's day there was no genetics,
especially molecular genetics).
Darwin, the inventor of evolution, was well aware of the
fundamental flaw in his theory: "Of all the problems of the fossil
record, the one that causes Darwinists the most anguish is the
Cambriam explosion." About 600 million years ago, almost all phyla of
animals (Phyum) appeared simultaneously in the strata...
As Dawkins puts it: "These animal fossils look as if someone had
put them there on purpose, with little evolutionary history to look
for."
When Darwin was alive, there was no evidence of any
pre-Sevorian life. In The Origin of Species, he admits that "this
phenomenon remains unexplained, and indeed can be used as strong
evidence against the point I am discussing".
It can be seen that Darwin also knew that his theory had a soft
threat that could not be demonstrated, because life has a special
complex physiological structure and a special structure of organic
chemistry!
In fact, the theory of evolution must have transitional types
between species during evolution, and evolution without "transitional
types" is a fallacy. 5000 years of human civilization history, especially
paleontology so far there is no conclusive evidence of "crossing type";Darwin and others assumed that clear evidence would be found in
the 20th century, that is, they used "conjecture" as evidence at that
time - this is a simple mistake! Until 2022, countless fossils have been
excavated by archeology, and there is no evidence of a "transitional
type" that can withstand scrutiny and identification, and it will never
appear! ...
Darwin promoted Haeckel's "law of reenactment" to the niche
"four-stage" chain of fake fossils "from
"Ape to man" centuries-old dream is nothing to say about
evolution
In PhilipJohnson's The Trial of Darwin, he concluded that Darwin
"went from ape to man".
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 219
"What fossils show us is an organism that appeared suddenly,
without any trace of gradual evolution... Once these organisms appear,
they basically don't change, even after millions of years, regardless of
climate and environment. If Darwin's theory were true, these
conditions should have caused dramatic changes in the species."
In the early 19th century, Cuvier, the father of paleontology
(1769According to Charles H. Hapgood, the tectonic plates shifted
thousands of miles in a very short period of time, bringing Siberia to
where it is today, as a result of tectonic plate drift.
In fact, since Linnaeus, organisms belonging to various taxonomic
categories (such as different kingdoms, phyla, class, order) have their
own different basic structures, and there are very few intermediate
types between the major categories.
In 1972, American paleontologists Gould and Niels Eldridge
proposed the "intermittent equilibrium" theory of evolution.
Punctuated equilibrium is the theory that evolution is not a slow
gradual accumulation, as Darwin and neo-Darwinians believed, but a
process of long periods of stability (or even unchanging) alternating
with short upheavals, leaving many gaps in the geological record. The
"punctuated equilibrium" theory led to a total denial and suspicion of
Darwinism, and Gould always believed that the core of Darwinism
was the theory of natural selection, rather than the theory of
biological gradation.In 1997, Gould published the Grandeur of Life: Gould on the
Grand History of Biology, which immediately caused a global
sensation. Gould used "common sense" to tell the world that the
change of organisms from simple to complex and from low to high is
not a universal iron law of nature, and describing "evolution" as a
trend is a mythical myth derived from anthropocentrism. Revealing
and pointing out the fatal defects of evolution has become the
consensus of modern life science theory.
In his classic book "Since Darwin - Reflections on Natural History",
Gould asks mankind: Why did Darwin, after establishing the theory of
evolution, publish it 20 years late?
Gould ruthlessly revealed and replied, "This is because he knows
that the implications of evolution are more deviant than most people
realize!"
In 1860, Haeckel firmly believed in evolution after reading
Darwin's Origin of Species. In his book General Morphology published
in 1866, he clarified the morphological structure of organisms from
the point of view of evolution, and put forward the "law of repetition"
in the form of "systematic tree", indicating the evolutionary process
and kinship of various animals. The origin of life and human evolution
are fully integrated into the evolutionary system, becoming the
"monkey into man" theory second only to Darwin's originator!
Many modern scholars have completely proved that the law of
recapitulation is an observational error and a false theory;
Blechschmidt, a German human embryologist, wrote TheBeginnings
ofHuman Life, which completely denied Darwinian evolution and
Haeckel's law of repetition. Darwin himself admitted and inferred
that:
"There must be a great number of transitional links and
intermediate forms between living species and extinct species."
Blechschmidt uses hard facts to prove "just the opposite."
Geologists find new species or groups of new species that appear
suddenly, rather than through a series of evolution."
Darwin had to admit that fossil evidence was "the most obvious
argument against my theory of evolution." "I do not wish to pretend
that I do not know how meagre the record of abrupt changes in
species is, and that in the best preserved strata no great number oftransitional organisms can be found to connect those that arose
before and after each stratum." This is the greatest difficulty of my
theory."
Therefore, the British Empire in order to "the sun never sets",
1908 - February 1912 Towson and Sir Woodward high-level carefully
planned the Piltdown earth-shaking fossil fraud case, and fossil fraud
continues to ferment: The transition fossil between an ape and the
Gabor man, discovered in 1892 and pieced together from an ape skull
and a human leg bone 40 feet apart, has been consigned to the
garbage bag of history; Until 1984, "Gabor man" was replaced by a
newly discovered fossil of ape "Lucy", which was later identified and
determined that "Lucy" was an extinct ape and had nothing to do
with humans.
The first six "Archaeopteryx fossils" that rocked paleontology
were once thought to be examples of transitional species between
birds and reptiles; five were later identified as man-made, and the
remaining one resolutely rejected any identification. The original
"discoverer" confessed one of the reasons for the falsification: too
much belief in evolution, and forged fake fossils, said to be the most
powerful fossil evidence.
The most fatal error of evolution is that there is a fundamental
contradiction between the theories of inference, and there is no other
difference in the world; As Gould graphically reveals
That's why all the famous paleontologists like Linnaeus... And the
great geologist... Are unanimous in their insistence on the absolute
immutability of species "!
In 1880, many exquisite stone tools were unearthed under Taibo
Mountain in California, after identification
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang) 221
Confirming that this remains is 55 million years old completely
breaks the evolutionary system of human evolution.
In 1966, a batch of iron spears was unearthed in Hoyalek, Mexico,
and Dr. McIntyre, an American geologist, was ordered to identify
them. She dated the iron spear in two ways and got the same result:
250,000 years ago, the iron spear was a human-made tool. 250,000
years completely contradicts the theory of evolution "from ape toman"...
Johnson concluded in his masterpiece, The Trial of Darwin:
"Fossils show us the sudden emergence of some organism, without
any trace of gradual evolution... Once these organisms emerge, they
basically stay the same, even after millions of years, regardless of
climate and environment. If Darwin's theory were true, these
conditions should have caused dramatic changes in the species."
Since the Origin of Species, evolutionists have never come up
with a formula to calculate the probability that a genetic mutation
mechanism will actually evolve; In fact, any reasonable formula would
negate evolution. Scientists have proved the deception and error of
modern evolution by probability;
In many ways, Behe, M.J. 's Darwin's Black Box completely
negates evolution from the complex (chemical) precision of the
structure of life. A loose formula is proposed to calculate the
probability of evolution giving rise to a new species based on the
probability of mutation: P = (M · C·L·B·S)N Generally speaking, an
individual of a species has a mutation (the probability is only 10-3),
and the mutant gene is compatible with the products of its other
genes at different levels (loosely estimated as 10-2), and the
individual can survive in the competition for survival. There is a
chance of reproduction (10-1); And the mutation happens to have
vertical evolutionary significance (this has not yet been found, but is
estimated at 10-3); Moreover, mutant genes are not lost, stable, and
expanded in the population, and once lost, they have to start again (a
loose estimate is 10-2); Since the formation of a new species requires
the emergence of a series of new genes, assuming 10 (power N = 10,
there is absolutely no such small fundamental difference between
species), then the probability of the evolution of a new species is: P =
(10-3× 10-2 × 10-1 × 10-3× 10-2) 10 = 10-110. With 10 generations a
year and a population of 1,000 individuals, the time required for
evolution would be 10,106 years, a very loose calculation. At present,
science believes that the total number of elementary particles in the
universe is only 1070, the age of the universe is only 20 billion
(2×1010 years), and the time to evolve a new species is the age of the
universe multiplied by 1 billion times, which shows that evolution is
impossible. Numerous practices have proved that the change of
varieties and the emergence of new species are two different things(variety is the result of artificial selection, species is the natural
existence of natural systems).
In their book Forbidden Archeolgy, archaeologists Michael A.
Cremo & RichardThompson list 500 conclusive examples of evolution
that contradict it, It is the remains of human civilization tens of
thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, tens of thousands or
even hundreds of millions of years ago. For example: "D.G.Brinton's
1890 study pointed out that Negroes are inferior because they retain
the characteristics of infancy; L. Bolk's 1926 study declared that blacks
were inferior because their development exceeded the juvenile
characteristics retained by the white race."
The Cambrian explosion of life has completely proved the real
historical existence of "catastrophe" and "intermittent equilibrium",
In this short period of time, the earth's landform rarely changes,
and there is no human "disaster"; For example, the historical map of
the world in 1532, which shows Antarctica below the ice sheet, is
strikingly similar when superimposed with modern measurements of
Antarctica below the ice sheet.
Also found in Constantinople was A map of the coast of Africa
and South America and a map of Antarctica, made in 1513 by A.
PiriReis, accurate to half a degree of longitude, 250 years before
humans were able to locate themselves at sea. Apparently, this is a
relic of a previous period of human civilization. What's more, at that
time, Antarctica was not covered with ice, so there is no "evolution"!
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 223
Chapter 23
The "prehistoric civilization" left over from the Big Bang
highlights the broken nightmare of Darwin's evolutionI. The Real "Prehistoric Civilization"
New Zealand genetics doctor Dan Dun in the "Crisis theory:
Evolution" book will be Darwin's evolution as "the biggest lie of the
20th century", in Dan Dun's view, human beings such higher life is
extremely complex, and not Darwin said "natural selection" mutation
result, and put forward a big point of view: "Prehistoric civilization" is
real, and human beings are the orphans of prehistoric civilization.
On October 17, 2021, archaeologists Michael A. Cremo &Richard
Thompson's book Forbidden Archeology, It lists 500 concrete
examples, which are the remains of human civilization tens of
thousands, hundreds of thousands, millions, tens of thousands and
billions of years ago, which are completely unexplainable objects by
Darwinian evolution! ...
Paleontologists believe that human civilization evolved in just
over 6,000 years. So, 55 million to 260,000 years ago and 2 billion to
2.6 billion years ago, the discovery of human "prehistoric civilization"
remains and emerge in an endless stream, will be unselfish to put
Darwin's evolution into the cold palace, forever! ...
Two, two billion years of large nuclear reactors and 2.8 billion
years of prehistoric remains
In 1968, archaeologists Y. Druet and H. Salfati discovered several
different types of metal tubes in a limestone formation in France that
is 65 million years old (Corliss, 1978, 652-653). It can be traced back
to hundreds of delicate metal balls unearthed in South Africa's Clarks
Mountains, 2.8 billion years ago.
A large nuclear reactor from 2 billion years ago was discovered in
Gabon, and the structure of the reactor was even more advanced
than today's, and all available radioactive elements were extracted...
55 million year old weapon to 260,000 year old iron spear
In 1880, a group of exquisite stone tools unearthed 300 feet
underground in Taibo Mountain, California, were identified as remains
55 million years ago.
In 1966, a batch of iron spears was unearthed in Hoyalek, Mexico,
and the American geologist Dr. Macintyre found that this was a
250,000 year old weapon.
Archaeologist Juan Armenta, in the city of Prirava, Mexico, found
an animal's jawbone with a broken spearhead of an iron spear, which
he identified as a 260,000-year-old weapon...The hammer "alloy" contains 96.6 percent iron, 0.74 percent
sulfur, 2.6 percent chlorine far beyond human modern civilization
Twelve dinosaur footprints have been found in rock formations
along the banks of the Lacey River in Texas
Fossil human footprints; Later, in the same strata, fossils of
human fingers and an iron hammer, the handle of which had turned
into coal, were found, suggesting that the area had been buried deep
underground in ancient times.
The hammer head contains 96.6 percent iron, 0.74 percent sulfur,
2.6 percent chlorine, which is now impossible to create an alloy,
showing a highly developed human civilization in prehistoric times!
Four, the Greek Plato "Dialogues" of the "Atlantis" empire ten
thousand years miracle
In 2011, a team of archaeologists claimed to have found the
location of Atlantis: beneath the mudflats of southern Spain,
confirming that the "Great Western nation" sank to the bottom of the
sea in a devastating flood in 10,000 BC.
In 350 BC, the ancient Greek philosopher Plato, in his Dialogues,
tells of this highly developed civilization, the empire of Atlantis, which
had manned spaceflight vehicles: Atlantis had the most amazing
energy system, the center of which was a transparent hexagonal
cylinder known as the "magnetic Eurostone" (now lost). This stone
can absorb sunlight, and turn sunlight into energy, and even allow the
human body to regenerate and rejuvenate, incredible... Coincidentally,
in 2013, the expedition team found an underwater pyramid in the
waters west of Portugal, which is estimated to be the remains of
Atlantis.
...
To sum up, so far, the remains of large-scale human "prehistoric
civilization" are in front of the eyes, dazzling: there are ten thousand
years of Egypt's pyramids, the ancient Maya pyramid that was brilliant
on the earth, the ancient city of Tijuana in Bolivia in 900 AD, the
Sacehuaman castle in Peru around 120,000 AD, and so on... Let
Darwinian evolution tremble in the face of human "prehistoric
civilization" (in front of a large nuclear reactor 2 billion years ago)!
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global PlateHeredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 225
Chapter 24: Modern man discovers the "Force" of the Big Bang
explosion in the galaxy, universe and Earth all things in the "atomic"
core contains a shocking secret
Three thousand years ago, the ancient Greeks predicted the
existence of atoms in all things
What is the original force of all things in the Greeks
This is 3000 years oldP=n h/2π
(2) When the electron moves on any orbit permitted by the
above hypothesis, the atom has a certain energy Wn, and does not
emit light, which is called a stable motion state.
(3) Only when the atom transitions from a stable motion state
with a larger energy Wn to another stable motion state with a lower
energy Wk, the atom emits monochromatic light, and its frequency is:
vkn = Wn/h - Wk/h.
In 1913, N. Bohr, a student at the University of Cambridge in
England, proposed a hypothesis that successfully explained the
spectrum of the H atom, the atomic hypothesis above; Here, it
contains:
A\ stationary state hypothesis
Atoms can only be in a series of discontinuous energy states in
which they are stable. Although electrons revolve around the core,
they do not radiate energy outward, and these states are called
stationary states. [1]
B\ energy hypothesis
When an atom transitions from one stationary state to another,
it radiates or absorbs photons of a certain frequency, and the energy
of the photons is determined by the energy difference between the
two stationary states. hv=Em-En (h is Planck's constant).
C\ orbital hypothesis
The different energy states of atoms correspond to the different
orbits of electrons. Since the energy state of the atom is
discontinuous, the orbital motion of the electron may also be
discontinuous, that is, the electron cannot move in an orbit of any
radius.
Third, modern Bohr and three generations of teachers andstudents have opened the secret of the atomic core
Bohr's theory successfully explained the characteristics of the
spectral discontinuity of hydrogen atoms and the discontinuity of the
energy state, leaving the internal problem of energy how to decrypt! ?
Bohr's "atomic model" provided the key to solving this problem,
and was later completed by three generations of Bohr's teachers and
students, Joseph Thomson, Ernest Rutherford, and James Chadwick.
"If I could re-examine the state of the body in relation to
electromagnetism and current in a more particular way, I should
certainly go beyond what I know now, but that is, of course, a later
time."
-- William Thomson
Modern scientist Joseph Thomson discovers the plum pudding
model - uncovering the atom
First veil
William Thomson, 1st Baron Kelvin, also known as Lord Kelvin.
Born June 26, 1824, in Belfast, Ireland, and died December 17, 1907,
in Largs, Scotland. He is a British mathematical physicist and engineer.
He is also the inventor of the thermodynamic temperature scale
(absolute temperature scale) and is known as the father of
thermodynamics.
While studying beta rays, Thomson discovered that beta rays are
made of a negatively charged particle called an electron.
Thomson thought that there should be electrons like this in
every atom. Moreover, Thomson came up with his model of the plum
pudding atom: each atom is like a plum pudding, with positive
charges distributed evenly throughout the atom, like the pudding, and
negatively charged electrons scattered over the pudding, like the
raisins.
The pudding model was the most important scientific historical
frontier of its day, and it was ignored; The core of the theory is:
"atoms can continue to be divided", subverting the modern atomism
from the ancient Greek Democritus to Dalton inherited the "atom is
not divided" error! The first theoretical splitting of atoms cleared the
way for his student Rutherford to continue splitting atoms!
The modern scientist Rutherford's model of alchemy goes deep
into the nucleus
In 1901, while studying the radioactive element "thorium",Rutherford discovered that thorium could be released
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 227
Emitting alpha rays, and to his surprise, after decay, thorium
turned into another element.
The ability of one element to transform into another, which had
previously existed only in the fantasies of alchemists, was now
confirmed by Rutherford, a major discovery that won Rutherford the
1908 Nobel Prize in chemistry - revealing the most mysterious
problem: Rutherford thought he was a physicist winning the Nobel
Prize in chemistry was difficult to understand; The important thing
here is that nature does not separate physics and chemistry, but that
natural phenomena are related; Rutherford's research on the "decay"
of radioactive elements has identified a great fact: the energy
released by radioactive elements comes from within atoms - the
mysterious distribution and retention of the "force" of the 13.7 billion
year cosmic explosion in the "atoms" of the galaxy, the universe and
the Earth! ... ; Modern scientist Rutherford found from the energy
rays and "decay" inside atoms that atoms can continue to be broken
down
In 1908, Rutherford, with the help of his assistant Geiger,
continued to bombard the gold foil with alpha particles. They found
that when the alpha particles passed through the gold foil, most of
the particles passed straight through, while a very small number of
particles were shifted, which Rutherford called scattering, and a very
small number of particles were shifted very much.
There must be a reason behind the anomaly, and Rutherford
focused his research on these highly deflected particles, and he even
asked his assistant to look for any alpha particles that had bounced
back. Although Rutherford himself did not have much hope, the
assistant actually found that there were very, very few particles that
bounced straight back.
In Rutherford's own words, it's like taking a cannon and hitting a
tissue, and the cannonball bounces off the tissue. These bouncing
particles, like a cannonball, hit Rutherford's imagination.
At the time, Rutherford already knew that alpha particles were
positively charged, and if they were deflected so much, one possibilitywas that they were subjected to a very large electromagnetic force.
The ricocheted particle should have hit this place where the charge is
concentrated, which is the nucleus...
After four years of repeated research, Rutherford confirmed a
large number of data, and considered it foolproof, in 1911, published
the "Rutherford model";
Rutherford believed that the atom was not indestructible, but
had a tiny positively charged nucleus in the middle and electrons
orbiting it at high speed.
Modern scientist Rutherford found from the energy rays and
"decay" inside atoms that atoms can continue to be broken down
In 1908, Rutherford, with the help of his assistant Geiger,
continued to bombard the gold foil with alpha particles. They found
that when the alpha particles passed through the gold foil, most of
the particles passed straight through, while a very small number of
particles were shifted, which Rutherford called scattering, and a very
small number of particles were shifted very much.
There must be a reason behind the anomaly, and Rutherford
focused his research on these highly deflected particles, and he even
asked his assistant to look for any alpha particles that had bounced
back. Although Rutherford himself did not have much hope, the
assistant actually found that there were very, very few particles that
bounced straight back.
In Rutherford's own words, it's like taking a cannon and hitting a
tissue, and the cannonball bounces off the tissue. These bouncing
particles, like a cannonball, hit Rutherford's imagination.
At the time, Rutherford already knew that alpha particles were
positively charged, and if they were deflected so much, one possibility
was that they were subjected to a very large electromagnetic force.
The ricocheted particle should have hit this place where the charge is
concentrated, which is the nucleus...
After four years of repeated research, Rutherford confirmed a
large number of data, and considered it foolproof, in 1911, published
the "Rutherford model";
Rutherford believed that the atom was not indestructible, but
had a tiny positively charged nucleus in the middle and electrons
orbiting it at high speed.
The modern scientist Rutherford discovered from inside theatom energy rays and "decay" atoms can
Continue to remove ②
In 1920, Rutherford published his discovery that the hydrogen
nucleus is the basic unit that makes up all atomic nuclei. He gave this
basic unit a name, the proton. After announcing his discovery, he
went to work with another physicist, Patrick Blakely, to do more
research and test his hypothesis.
After looking at more than 400,000 tracks across 23,000 images,
they found eight unusual tracks. Again, from the anomalies,
Rutherford made the big discovery that these eight tracks showed
that the hydrogen nuclei were indeed the building blocks of the nuclei
of other elements (these eight tracks represented nitrogen atoms)
Nuclear alpha particles collide to form extremely unstable
fluorine atoms, which later decay into an oxygen nucleus and a
hydrogen nucleus).
The young Curies of modern scientists missed the discovery of
the neutron but missed the Nobel Prize
After Rutherford discovered the proton, he and his assistant
Chadwick made another amazing discovery.
The nucleus of a nitrogen atom weighs roughly 14 times as much
as the nucleus of a hydrogen atom (about the same weight as 14
protons), and there are only seven electrons, so if there were only
protons in the nucleus, the nitrogen atom would be charged, which is
unlikely. Rutherford speculated that there should be an uncharged
neutral particle within the nucleus, weighing about the same as a
proton.
This neutral particle is the neutron. But so far, this is just a
conjecture, and Rutherford doesn't have direct proof that neutrons
exist.
This evidence was first discovered by two German scientists,
Walther Bothe and Herbert Becker.
In 1930, they bombarded lithium, beryllium, boron and other
elements with alpha particles, and after bombarding them, they
found a strange ray. This radiation is very energetic and has no charge,
they think, it should be gamma radiation (a type of electromagnetic
radiation).
It is said that the first evidence of neutrons was found by
Madame Curie's daughter and son-in-law, the young Curie couple.The young Curies after their mother discovered radioactivity; And
immediately you study this radiation and you bombard other matter
with this radiation, and you get protons that are so energetic that you
wonder if this radiation itself is gamma? This brush with the neutron,
and miss the Nobel Prize!
Nine, modern people found that the neutron had a mentor
(fulcrum) story Scientific discovery is a guide
The process of teacher inheritance; Ancient Greek city-state
science innovation technology "master with apprentice" was born
Italian Renaissance three masters: Da Vinci, Michelangelo,
Raphael!
Science comes from art.
Similarly, the neutron was found to have a mentor (fulcrum)
story:
[The second example is Chadwick's discovery of the neutron. This
is the most typical example of a mentor fulcrum producing an original
innovation and winning a Nobel Prize. When Bohr proposed a model
of the structure of the atom, Bohr discovered that all elements had
different atomic weights and protons. Bohr told Rutherford about this
hypothesis in a conversation with Rutherford, who was then running
the Cavendish Laboratory, and tried to blast neutrons out of the
nuclei of light elements with A particle, but never succeeded in
finding the neutrons. In 1930, the German physicist Posey reported:
When he bombarded the beryllium target with a particle, he found
that the unprecedentedly strong radiation could penetrate lead plates
several centimeters thick. Only r particles could penetrate thick lead
plates at that time, so Posey thought that this was the r particle, and
he easily missed the fulcrum where the neutron was discovered. A
year later, the famous French physicists Joliot Curie and his wife
reworked Posey's fundamental theory of global life science I (" The
Law of Global Plate Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 229
The result was the same as Posey's, and it was found that
paraffin wax made of two light atoms, carbon and hydrogen,
encountered this ray
Protons were knocked out of the paraffin. The Curies thought
only that this was a new function of the r rays, and once again let the
discovery of the fulcrum of the neutron pass easily. Since Chadwick
remembered the neutron predictions of his mentors Bohr andRutherford, he immediately thought that this was the neutron they
had been searching for for so long. Because: 1, the r ray moves at the
speed of light, and the unknown ray - the neutron speed is only 1/10
of the speed of light. 2. Because r rays have no mass, they have no
momentum and cannot knock protons out. Chadwick was awarded
the Nobel Prize in 1935 for his experimental proof of the existence of
neutrons. It can be seen that the teacher fulcrum has the most direct
power to move the earth. Therefore, we should pay attention to every
word of the teacher and take notes at any time, although we can not
understand it at that time, but sometimes it will become the fulcrum
spirituality that is readily available, so that our lives can be brilliant. 】
-- From "Qiang Yanping's Speech at Tsinghua University's Scientific
Research Thinking Method Class on April 15, 2003"
10. Modern scientists Xiao Curie and his wife Discovered the Big
Bang "chain reaction"
The young Curies were Frederic Joliot-curie (1900-1958) and his
wife Irene Joliot-Curie (1897-1956). The Jolio-Curies proved that
neutrons produced by fission could cause a chain reaction.
My scientists, who discovered nuclear fission and chain reactions,
obtained the basis for the practical use of atomic energy from
scientific experiments, and opened up broad prospects for the
development of new energy sources for mankind because of the
discovery of stable artificial radioactivity, they won the 1935 Nobel
Prize in chemistry.
In 1937, he left the Radiological Society and began working as a
professor at the College de France, where he was involved in the
study of chain reactions and nuclear reaction conditions, successfully
generating energy through nuclear reactions using uranium and heavy
water to achieve controlled nuclear fission. Jorio was one of the
scientists Einstein mentioned in a letter to President Roosevelt, and
Einstein called him "one of the leading scientists of the chain
reaction" -Einstein
11. Modern scientist Lawrence "Cyclotron" competed for the
1939 Nobel Prize
The history of science is always full of coincidences, Lawrence
also discovered Walther Bothe and the young Curie couple regret
missing out on the 1935 Nobel Prize, but was won by Chadwick.
However, there are no limits to scientific discovery! ...In 1929 Lawrence designed and led the construction of the first
circular accelerator, the cyclotron, and led the construction of the
Berkeley Radiation Laboratory.
1932 Construction of a 28cm accelerator to accelerate protons to
1.22 MeV and the discovery of a series of transuranic elements such
as technetium and lawrencium (named in honour of Lawrence). As a
result, the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory became the world's first
accelerator center, and trained a large number of accelerator
professionals, promoting major advances in particle physics.
In 1941, he also successfully used an accelerator to prepare a
carbon ion beam of 96 meV, and would rotate itRadioactive
phosphorus and other isotopes produced in accelerators were used in
medical treatment, the first treatment of thyroid diseases with
radioactive iodine, and the treatment of cancer with neutron beams.
During World War II, he was involved in the development of the
Manhattan Project, overseeing the electromagnetic separation of
uranium-235 needed to make atomic bombs, and Lawrence won the
1939 Nobel Prize in Physics for his contribution to the creation of the
accelerator.
12, modern scientist Fermi created the world's first controlled
nuclear fission chain reactor
Uncover the Big Bang "Force" hidden within the Big Bang Force
of everything
Fermi was an ItaliAn-American physicist who, in early 1926,
proposed a statistical law to which electrons should obey, based on
the Pauli exclusion principle. This statistical law also applies to other
particles subject to the exclusion principle, such as protons and
neutrons, which made an unprecedented breakthrough in
understanding the structure and properties of matter, and was
elected a member of the Royal Society of Italy in 1929 and a foreign
member of the Royal Society of Britain in 1950. In honor of his work,
the element with atomic number 100 is named 镄 after him.
In 1930 Pauli proposed the neutrino hypothesis (officially
published in 1933) and Fermi accepted the neutrino hypothesis in
conjunction with W.K. In 1932, Heisenberg proposed that beta decay
is the process in which a neutron in the nucleus emits an electron into
a proton, and in 1933, he proposed the beta decay theory, which
successfully explained many characteristics of the beta decayphenomenon. In 1934, Fermi struck upon the idea of bombarding
uranium nuclei with neutrons, which Chadwick had just discovered.
After bombarding them, Fermi found something highly radioactive; I
thought I had elements 93 and 94, which are heavier than uranium...
It was uranium that was blasted into an even smaller element and
won the 1938 Nobel Prize in Physics.
In 1939, when N. Bohr went to the United States to tell Fermi the
news of uranium fission, Fermi immediately began to explore the
nuclear fission chain reaction and under the leadership of Fermi and
his assistants built the world's first controlled nuclear fission chain
reactor at the University of Chicago on December 2, 1942. Scientists
in Britain, Italy and Germany have found that the energy produced by
fission of one gram of uranium is actually equivalent to the energy
released by burning three tons of coal. In this way, from Democritus in
ancient Greece to physicist Fermi, the huge amount of violent energy
(uranium fission) hidden inside the "atom" of the Big Bang was
exposed to the light of day! That was the birth of the Manhattan
Project and the American bombing of Hiroshima on August 6, 1945
An atomic bomb called "Little Boy"! ...
August 2, 1939 Einstein to Roosevelt - The Big Bang (Hell)
This is how the fire opens...
To F.D. Roosevelt
Through the exchange of draft studies with E. Furmi and I. Szilard,
recent work leads me to believe that uranium (nuclear fuel) will
become a new and important source of energy in the near future.
Many problems arising from this call for high vigilance and prompt
action by government departments if necessary. Therefore, I believe it
is my duty to draw your attention to the following facts and
suggestions.
In the past four months, through the work of Joliot in France,
and the Fundamental Theory of the Global Life Sciences of Formi and
Sirard in the United States (" The Law of Global Plate Heredity - The
Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 231
The state carried out work using large amounts of uranium to
build nuclear chain reactors, which produced enormous amounts of
energy and power
Quantities of new radium-like elements have become possible. It
is now almost certain that this will happen in the near future.This new phenomenon will guide the construction of bombs, and
it is possible - though not yet certain - that very powerful bombs will
thus be built. Such a single bomb, carried on a ship and exploded in a
harbor, would have the potential to destroy the entire harbor and the
surrounding environment. However, such a bomb might be too heavy
for air transport.
There is only a small amount of suitable uranium ore in the
United States. There are some good ores in Canada and
Czechoslovakia, but the best uranium resources are in the Congo.
Given this, you might think it would be necessary for the
physicists building the chain reactors in the United States to have a
permanent relationship with the administration. The way for you to
make this possible is to delegate the task to someone you trust, who
will work in an unofficial capacity. His duties may include the
following:
1. Get close to government departments, familiarize themselves
with future developments, and advise the government on its work,
particularly with a focus on obtaining uranium supplies for the United
States.
2. Address problems currently undertaken by university
laboratories with limited budgets by providing funding to accelerate
experimental activities. If funding is available, either through contacts
with individuals willing to contribute to the cause, or through
partnerships with corporate laboratories with the necessary
equipment.
I learned that Germany had actually stopped uranium trading in
Czechoslovak mines and had taken it over. It is understandable that it
has taken such early action, according to Weizsacker, the son of
Germany's deputy secretary of state, who works for the Kaiser
Wilhelm Institute in Berlin, where American activities on uranium
have been repeated.
Yours sincerely, Albert Einstein
From Albert Einstein Old Grove Street Konik, Long Island
August 2, 1939
Einstein regrets opening the "Promethean fire"
In order to counter Germany, Einstein came to the United States
at the beginning of the 20th century and gathered the world's top
nuclear scientists around the United States and sent a letter toPresident Roosevelt.
In October 1939, the Uranium Advisory Board was formed, the
development plan was approved in December, and soon the United
States
Congress appropriated $2 billion for research.
On July 16, 1945, the United States completed the world's first
nuclear explosion, and then on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb
named "Little Boy" was dropped on Hiroshima, Japan, killing 50,000
people that day. According to 2007 statistics, a total of 250,000
people died.
For this, Einstein regrets!
"I regret very much that I should never have written that letter to
President Roosevelt. I was just trying to get the atomic bomb out of
Hitler's hands, but instead I gave it to another madman."
-- Albert Einstein
Modern goddesses Meitner and Hahn opened the "Hellfire" side
door to peek into the universe
Explosion "The Force" shocking and terrifying burst
Lizer Meitner, born Elise Meitner (Elise Meitner), was born in
1878 in Leopold City, the second district of Vienna, Austria. In 1906,
she became the second female doctor in Vienna. The title of her
doctoral thesis was "Thermal conductivity in Inhomogeneous Matter".
In 1909, together with Hahn, Meitner discovered the rebound of
atomic nuclei during radioactive decay, and in 1917, Meitner
re-collaborated with Hahn, and together they discovered
protactinium synchronism
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 233
Protactinium 231; Protactinium was discovered in 1913 by Kasimi
Fajans and O.H. Green, and protactinium 231 is its most famous
In 1918 Meitner finally got her own research group and a
corresponding salary. She was appointed professor in 1922.
16. Lizer Meitner is the best in the world the first theory toexplain Otto Ha
The woman scientist who discovered nuclear fission in 1938;
Opened a "hellfire" for humanity
Wicket door
In 1939 Meitner and her nephew Otto Frisch published a paper
entitled "Fission of Uranium by Neutrons: A New Nuclear Reaction",
in which they presented Hahn's theoretical explanation of "rupture",
providing the first theoretical basis for nuclear fission. Peek into the
Big Bang "Force" inside the atom "rupture" to reveal the true face of
explosive!
...
During World War II, Meitner fled to Sweden via the Netherlands
and Denmark because his life was threatened by his Jewish relatives.
In 1938 Hahn wrote to Meitner that he had discovered a "broken"
phenomenon. Hahn wrote: "Is it possible that uranium-239 has
broken up into barium and technetium? I'd love to know your opinion.
Perhaps you could do the math and publish something..."
This "fission" phenomenon is when bombarding uranium atoms
with neutrons, uranium nuclear fission into several pieces (one of the
products is barium), Hahn felt that this is too anti-common sense,
Hahn and other scientists do not know how to explain this
phenomenon, can only turn to the "physical better" Meitner female
scientists.
When Meitner saw this result, his first reaction was, impossible.
Next, Meitner thought that Hahn was a good chemist who discovered
that uranium had become barium, which should not have been a
simple mistake. So many "impossible" things in nuclear physics turned
out to be true; Lizer Meitner realized that this could also mean
something important!
The history of science bears witness to Meitner's intuition.
Meitner and Frisch came up with the idea of fission while they
were walking in the woods. The total mass of the nucleus after fission
is less than the mass of the uranium nucleus before fission, and this
small mass difference is converted into energy. Meitner used the
E=mc² equation in Einstein's theory of relativity to calculate the
energy released by each fissile nucleus at 200 million electron volts.
Meitner laid the foundations of the atomic bomb and atomic energy.
After Meitner told Niels Bohr about their results, Bohr is said to havesaid:
"Oh, how stupid we are."
17, modern scientist Meitner prophetic artificial sun nuclear
fusion
Steve Charles Cowley, director of the Modern UK Karam Fusion
Centre, told the Science and Technology Committee of the House of
Lords on July 21, 2015: Members of the International Thermonuclear
Experiment Reactor say 2020, but I don't think the reactor will
produce the first plasma until 2025. He thinks burning plasma in 2030
It's not likely to happen early this year... The International
Thermonuclear Reactor Experiment, also in Cadarachet, France
(ITER) has cost $20 billion;
Fusion is the process by which lighter atomic nuclei (such as
deuterium and tritium) combine to form heavier ones (such as
helium).
The nucleus remains and contains huge (big Bang) energy, and
the change of the nucleus is from one kind of nucleus to another kind
of nucleus, which naturally releases explosive energy.
Scientists have learned that the two forms of nuclear change are:
Nuclear fusion; Second, nuclear fission.
The Manhattan Project applied the principle that nuclear fission
is the explosion of atomic bombs, and Fermi's world's first reactor
used the principle of nuclear fission to generate electricity, nuclear
power plants, and atomic bombs.
Nuclear fusion is the explosive principle of hydrogen bombs,
because the explosion is so explosive that the instantaneous
explosion of hydrogen bombs (Big Bang primordial) energy is
currently beyond human control!
In view of this, the purpose of the thermonuclear reactor
experiment (ITER) must be controlled nuclear fusion, to achieve the
great dream of scientists "artificial solar nuclear fusion", which will
become the great scientific frontier and new era of the 21st century.
Meitner's vision of the artificial sun's nuclear fusion; The sea
water on Earth contains a large amount of deuterium, and the lithium
that produces tritium is also abundant, making it ideal for lighter
atomic nuclei (such as deuterium and tritium).
Scientists have found that one liter of deuterium in seawater canrelease as much energy as 300 liters of gas and oil.
Compared with the nuclear fission of current nuclear reactors,
nuclear fusion reaction products have obvious advantages, helium is
very stable, and there is no pollution to the environment. Therefore,
nuclear fusion is the ideal and cleanest energy source for the future.
However, controlled fusion is too hard! According to Lawson
criterion: the density of the plasma gas involved in the reaction and
the reliable confinement time for it. First, it requires extremely high
temperatures and pressures. The temperature at the center of the
sun is as high as 15 million degrees Celsius from the Big Bang, and
there is still enormous pressure for nuclear fusion to work properly.
It is impossible to obtain such pressure on Earth, and it can only
be compensated by raising the temperature to hundreds of millions of
degrees; You also need a fairly low density. The plasma at high
temperature has a considerable pressure, so the gas in the container
must be pumped to an absolute vacuum, which is equivalent to one
millionth of the gas density at normal temperature; And because the
plasma at high temperatures is very unstable, it is necessary to fully
constrain the plasma and maintain a certain time to make it fully
fuse! ...
In the fusion process, high temperature, density, pressure,
vacuum, time, and sufficient confinement of the plasma (which is
what the Big Bang requires); We can't have any problems at all.
Otherwise, it will fall short! Even produce a global disaster more than
a billion times the nuclear explosion! - The explosion of the artificial
sun will destroy the world!
18, a major breakthrough in the United States to complete
nuclear fusion positive energy to reveal the universe's big bang stars
in the solar system
Origin of energy
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 235
On December 13, 2022, U.S. Department of Energy officials
announced that Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California,
funded by the U.S. government, has for the first time successfully
achieved a "net energy gain" in a nuclear fusion reaction, in which the
energy produced by the fusion reaction is greater than the laserenergy that triggered the reaction. The experiment injected 2.05
megajoules of energy into the target, producing a fusion energy
output of 3.15 megajoules, with an energy gain of 153%. In a
statement, U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm called the
breakthrough a "landmark achievement."
File photo of Lawrence Livermore Laboratory
This is a major breakthrough in the new history of human science
and an epoch-making energy revolution, and modern humans are
approaching the energy mode nuclear fusion process generated
inside stars such as the sun, becoming a new epoch of benefiting
mankind into clean energy!
According to Lawson criterion: the density of the plasma gas
involved in the reaction and the reliable confinement time for it. First,
it requires extremely high temperatures and pressures. Considering
the Big Bang, the central temperature of the sun is as high as 15
million degrees Fahrenheit, and there is still enormous pressure to
make nuclear fusion work properly;
Meitner's vision of the artificial sun's nuclear fusion; The sea
water on Earth contains a lot of deuterium, and the lithium that
produces tritium is also abundant, which is ideal for lighter atomic
nuclei (such as deuterium and tritium), and the fuel for nuclear fusion
is light elements. Such as hydrogen isotopes (deuterium D, tritium T),
deuterium and tritium fusion is the most tolerant fusion in nature,
"seawater contains a lot of deuterium". Nuclear fusion yields huge
amounts of energy with a small amount of fuel; The American
experiment thus revealed the origin of nuclear fusion energyHawking
looked up to the sky when he was about to leave humanity and asked:
"Can we survive on Earth?"
Please see the "Ten questions Hawking Meditations" question 7:
"Can we survive on Earth?"
Hawking asked: "The universe is a violent place, stars engulf
planets, supernovae send deadly rays through space, black holes
smash into each other, asteroids hurl at hundreds of miles per second.
I admit that these phenomena don't make space sound very enticing,but they're exactly why we're venturing into space rather than staying
put. We have no defense against asteroid collisions. Our last big
impact happened about 60 million years ago, and people think it
wiped out the dinosaurs, and it's going to happen again. This is not
science fiction, it is guaranteed by the laws of physics and probability.
I think we are dangerously indifferent to our future on Earth." --
(131 pages)
Do your own evil can not live! Hawking's question of "Can we
survive on Earth?" The answer is no!
The reason is that Hawking is the founder of the Big Bang theory
of the universe, too much understanding of the big Bang in the
universe so far planets, galaxies, Earth, solar system, asteroids "burst"
properties (has been proved by Webb color photos); This is Hawking's
"ten predictions" in his lifetime are related to the destruction of space
aliens and human beings! Have a look:
Hawking's predictions: Ten predictions (Encyclopedia knowledge)
1, Hawking predicted: ten predictions, the earth will be
destroyed in 200 years. Hawking said that if the human race wants to
continue, it must colonize Mars or other planets, and the Earth will be
destroyed within 200 years. The only chance for human survival in the
long term is to leave the Earth and adapt to life on a new planet. If
human beings do not leave the Earth within two centuries, human
beings will disappear from the world forever.
2, Hawking predicted: ten predictions two, human colonization
of Mars within 40 years. Hawking believes that the earth will be
destroyed sooner or later, suggested human migration to Mars, etc.,
do not contact aliens, he also said that there have been many human
survival crises in the past, the frequency of this situation will increase,
we need to be very careful to avoid such crises, but if human beings
can successfully expand into outer space in the next two hundred
years, then human beings can avoid disaster. And predicted that
humans would be on Mars in 40 years;
3, Hawking predicted: ten predictions three, alien invasion of the
Earth. Hawking predicted that aliens may invade the Earth for
resources, he said that humans should be careful when trying to
establish contact with other life forms in outer space, because
humans can not be sure whether aliens will be friendly to humans, if
humans are the only intelligent life in the galaxy, they should ensuretheir survival and continuation;
4, Hawking predicted: ten predictions four, gene technology will
improve the human race. Hawking boldly predicted that human
beings will not only establish a new survival base on other planets in
the next 100 years, but also use genetic technology to improve the
existing race in the next 100 years or earlier, and said that whether
human beings like it or not, someone will design an improved variety
of human beings somewhere in the future. Embryos will be grown
outside the womb;
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 237
5, Hawking predicted: ten predictions five, the earth will become
a "fireball". Hawking always stressed that the earth
Life on the earth is likely to be extinct due to some kind of
disaster, and it is predicted that by the year 2600 AD, the earth will
face a situation where people have no foothold, and the consumption
of electricity will make the whole earth become "hot". It means that
the earth's temperature will rise year by year, and human beings will
destroy the earth if they do not control the emissions of greenhouse
gases such as carbon dioxide.
6, Hawking predicted: ten predictions six, mankind will be
destroyed by aliens. Hawking has always held the view of "alien threat
theory", he believes that advanced alien species will not allow the
lower human beings to live freely on the Earth and do not want to
occupy human territory, but there are experts who hold the opposite
view, that if aliens can come to the Earth, it means that their
civilization is far more than our human beings. Intelligent beings know
that reason dictates that they must treat other intelligent beings in a
measured way;
7, Hawking predicted: ten predictions seven, the future of
human choice. Hawking said that in the face of the limited resources
of the earth and the exponential growth of the population, the only
chance for long-term survival of mankind is not to stay on Earth, but
to find a way out into outer space. Therefore, Hawking strongly
supports the research of manned space flight, and pointed out that
humans are expected to drive spacecraft to do time travel. Hawking is
optimistic that with the current level of human scientific development,it is possible to find a suitable way to colonize outer space or an
Earth-like planet within 200 years;
8, Hawking predicted: ten predictions eight, the idea of
extraterrestrial life. Hawking believes that if there is already life in
other star systems, human beings have no chance to discover these
lives at this stage, but sooner or later human beings may find
primitive life different from human beings, but at the same time
believes that other planets are unlikely to have more advanced life
forms than human beings, even if there are, these life can not explore
the galaxy, did not find the Earth;
9, Hawking predicted: ten predictions nine, artificial intelligence
will replace human. Hawking has repeatedly claimed that the artificial
intelligence system is very dangerous, may subvert or even replace
human beings, and now the development trend of artificial
intelligence is not stable, and human beings can not fully control
artificial intelligence, many scientists said that human beings can not
develop artificial intelligence too deeply, once artificial intelligence
gets autonomous consciousness, it will backfire;
10, Hawking predicted: ten predictions ten, there will be a new
race in the future. Hawking said that the DNA of human beings on
Earth will become more complex at an extremely fast rate, and the
development of improved human beings on Earth will cause many
problems. After humans master gene editing technology, they will
design a species with highly similar characteristics to existing humans,
which will replace humans in various fields and help humans
complete daily production and work. It also suggests that the birth of
a new race may be the beginning of the end of human civilization...
Hawking is not in a hurry to see the Russian-Ukrainian war
detonated nuclear war to destroy the world human close at hand
He left us forever
Hawking's ten predictions have not predicted the war detonated
nuclear war to destroy the world human beings close at hand! How
powerful is a nuclear bomb? It is not a myth that 300 can make the
human race disappear!
There are 14,450 nuclear bombs in the world, which can make
the entire human race disappear 48.16 times!
O human beings! Is it scary?! ? Are you scared? Are you not
calm? !War has existed since the birth of mankind, and Homer's Iliad in
3000 years is the bloodiest war.
The cruelest testimony in history; In 2022, the "2.24" Russian
invasion of Ukraine broke out the most brutal, most extensive and
multinational war since the Second World War, which has formed a
great power war of 40 countries against Russia, and the
Russia-Ukraine war has entered the second year, and the end of the
war is not yet known in what year! ?
Cries of "nuclear war" keep coming! -- UN Secretary-General
Antonio Guterres warned at the opening session that one
misunderstanding and one wrong judgment could lead humanity to
the abyss of nuclear annihilation. (August 1, 2022) - The United States
and Russia have different words [The United States also pointed the
finger at Russia's special military operations in Ukraine at the npt
Review Conference. Us Secretary of State Antony Blinken called
Russia's attack around Ukraine's Zaporizhi nuclear power plant
"extremely irresponsible" and accused Moscow of using the plant as a
"nuclear shield" to attack Ukrainian troops. Russia's Permanent
mission to the United Nations said in a statement on its official
website on Tuesday that Russia completely rejects such accusations.
"It should be noted that there are no Russian troops deployed at the
Zaporizhi nuclear power plant, except for the limited number of
military personnel needed to ensure its security, which is protected
against nuclear provocations with unpredictable consequences by
Ukrainian militants. The Russian delegation also said that recently
Ukrainian militants used drones to carry out a number of
provocations against the nuclear power plant, including the use of
drones from NATO countries. ...
"Hawking has always emphasized that life on Earth is likely to be
extinct due to some kind of disaster," it seems that nuclear war to
destroy the human option is sooner or later - nuclear explosion,
nuclear fusion highlights the real existence of the universe's big Bang
Bang force secret! ... "I think we are dangerously indifferent to our
future on Earth," Hawking warned. With the completion of the
milestone achievement of the United States on December 13, 2022,
opening the Pandora Box universe Big Bang Force (nuclear explosion,
nuclear fusion) to destroy the Earth and all mankind, only in amoment of difference - this is the original intention of our research
and writing completed "The whole Plate Genetic Law - the whole life
science of the Universe Big Bang"!
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 239
Closing remarks
When I was young, my mother always asked me, "Chicken came
first?" "Or did the egg come first?" ... I said the egg came first! Mother
always smiles without answering; I am sensible, one day, my mother
and I sat in our own small yard, suddenly saw a big flower rooster
fried two wings, chasing two hens, hens clucking and not running,
flower rooster stepped on the hen constantly ha ha ha...
I asked my mother strangely, "Is the flower rooster crazy?" I said
to pick up pebbles...
"Don't fight! The rooster is stepping on eggs..."
When I grew up and read What Is Life, I learned that Schrodinger
said, "Now we know that the whole four-dimensional pattern is
determined by the structure of a single cell, the fertilized egg." -
That's what mom calls "stepping on eggs" (fertilized eggs)! - Life
originates from "fertilized eggs" that is "sexual reproduction", plants
and animals, microorganisms, bacteria, all life on Earth are almost the
same "sexual reproduction", this is the universe as a whole
reproductive system and model, she comes from the big Bang
"yin-yang and"! ...
According to Schrodinger, "the synthesis of all known knowledge
into a unified whole;" When we began to write "The Law of the
Whole Plate Genetics - The Whole Life of the Big Bang", we had to
systematically publicize and integrate the knowledge of Schrodinger's
"Nature and the Greek Scientific Humanism" and Hawking's Big Bang
theory, especially Schrodinger's "What is Life" and many scientific
theories from the Greeks to modern science. This is the theme and
methodology of this book.
Schrodinger integrated physics and biology, and explained the
nature of life through thermodynamics and quantum mechanics. He
put forward three questions: He proposed the concept of genetic
code from the perspective of informatics, and proposedmacromolecules-aperiperiodic crystals-as the model of genetic
material (gene); Especially from a quantum mechanical point of view,
It demonstrates the possibility of the persistence of genes and the
long-term stability of genetic patterns - this is the ultimate question of
Schrodinger's "quantum entanglement" of the soul of life tracing the
quantum gene from ancient Greece to modern times - "atom or
quantum" - the long-standing spell cracking technique, Avoiding the
complexity of the continuum - Nature and Greek Science and
Humanism, pp. 125
Nevertheless, it seems worthwhile for us to try to examine the
problem from all angles. One idea that I have touched upon in this
lecture is that the current difficulties in the physical sciences have to
do with the notorious conceptual complexity inherent in the idea of a
continuum. But that doesn't say much. How are they connected?
What is the relationship?
If you look at the development of physics in the last half century,
you will get the impression that the discontinuous features of nature
have largely been imposed on us against our will. The continuum
seems to make us feel very comfortable. The idea of a discontinuous
exchange of energy alarmed Max Planck, who had introduced it in
1900 to explain the distribution of energy in blackbody radiation. He
made many efforts to weaken this hypothesis and to get rid of it as
much as possible, but he was unsuccessful. Twenty-five years later,
the inventors of wave mechanics had once hoped to have paved the
way for a return to the classical continuous description, but once
again this has proved to be the case
Hope is unreliable. Nature itself seems to reject continuous
descriptions, and this rejection seems to have nothing to do with the
perplexity with which mathematicians deal with continuous bodies.
That's the impression you get from the last 50 years. But
quantum theory goes back another 24 centuries to Leucippus and
Democritus. They invented the first discontinuum-solitary atoms
embedded in the void. Our concept of elementary particles derives
both historically and conceptually from their conception of atoms. We
just stuck to it. These particles have now been shown to be quanta of
energy because, as Einstein discovered in 1905, matter and energy
are the same thing. So the idea of discontinuity is very old. How doesit come about? I want to show that it actually stems from the
complexity of the continuum and is a weapon against it, so to speak.
How did the ancient atomists come up with the atomistic idea of
matter? Now, the question is not only of historical significance, but
also of epistemological relevance. The question is sometimes put in
the following manner, and it is asked with some surprise: How do
thinkers, who have such a poor knowledge of the laws of physics and
are completely ignorant of all relevant experimental facts, come up
with a correct theory of the composition of objects? Sometimes you
will see that people find this "lucky discovery" so baffling that they
declare it a fluke and refuse to give any credit to the ancient atomists.
They claimed that the ancient atomist theory of the atom was an
unfounded conjecture, and that it could be proved to be a mistake.
Needless to say, it was a scientist, not a classicist, who arrived at this
curious conclusion.
I refuse to accept that, but I have to answer the question. It's not
that hard. The atomists and their ideas did not come from nowhere.
More than a century before them, Thales of Miletus had begun great
new inventions. The atomists continued down the formidable path of
the Ionian natural philosophers. The direct forerunner of the atomists
on this path was Anaximenes, whose main doctrine lay in the
emphasis on the importance of "dilution and condensation". By
thinking carefully about everyday experience, he abstracts an
argument: Any substance can appear as a solid, liquid, gaseous, and
"fire" state, and the change between these states does not imply a
change in nature, but arises from a geometric change, as if an equal
quantity of matter were expanded to a larger and larger volume
(dilution) or, conversely, reduced or compressed into a smaller and
smaller volume (condensation). This idea is so pertinent that a
modern introduction to the physical sciences can adopt it without any
modification. Moreover, it is certainly not an unfounded conjecture,
but the result of careful observation. 】
In factIt's clearly distinguished and recognizable by its shape and
size, but here the two sets of chromosomes are almost identical. As
we shall soon see, one set comes from the mother (egg) and the
other from the father (sperm). It is these chromosomes, or the axial
skeletal filaments of chromosomes that we see under a microscope,
that contain all the patterns of an individual's future developmentand its functioning in adulthood in a sort of codebook. Each set of
chromosomes contains the entire code; So in general, the fertilized
egg that forms the first stage of the future individual contains two
copies of the code. What is inherited is in fact the whole
(four-dimensional) pattern of the "phenotype", the visible and
obvious nature of the individual, which is copied for many generations
without appreciable change, and which remains constant for
centuries (though not for tens of thousands of years), and which in
each transmission is loaded with the material structure of the two
cells that combine to form the fertilized egg. It's a miracle." - What Is
Life?
"The temperature in the body, which may in fact be considered
uniform, reduces the requirement of thermodynamics to a fixed or
steadily decreasing free energy. It seems to be assumed, therefore,
that the formation of all macromolecular structures, permanent or
temporary, represents essentially irreversible processes which
increase the stability of the organism under favourable conditions
maintained by nutrition and respiration. Of course, photosynthesis in
plants, as Britten and Gamow have recently discussed, is
accompanied by an overall entropy increase." -- Bohr, "On Light and
Life Again"
In other words, photosynthesis and "entropy" became the
forefront of the origin of modern life science as a whole!
According to "1011 seconds after the Big Bang (10.4 billion years),
the temperature was about 105 Kelvin, the matter period." In the
early history of the universe, light dominated all forms of energy." The
quantum mechanics discovered by modern scientists was born after
the Big Bang (1011 seconds (10.4 billion years), and there is naturally
"quantum entanglement" hidden in the mystery of the big Bang; The
order of the solar system and the motions of the planets are
maintained almost indefinitely. The constellations at this moment are
directly related to the constellations at any time in the Pyramid age;
You can trace the constellations back from the current constellations.
At the very beginning of the Big Bang (10-12 seconds after the Big
Bang: about 1015 degrees, particle period), the Big Bang used
quantum entanglement to create an indivisible whole and an implicit
order - all things in the universe, and proved that the Force is the
microscopic quantum origin of the initial existence of "quantumentanglement". For an entangled multiparticle system, the quantum
state function cannot be decomposed into the product of the
quantum states of its parts. Generally speaking, quantum
entanglement refers to two or more particles separated in space, due
to some mutual use, so that the information or physical properties of
each particle become the overall characteristics and cannot be
separated, which is why it is called "entanglement"; All this has been
achieved by 2022 Nobel Prize-winning physicist Alain
242 Fundamental Theory of Global Life Sciences I (" The Law of
Global Plate Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") Aspect, John
F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger. Experiments have proved that actions
speak louder than words - this is the origin of the whole science of life
in the Big Bang!
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 243
appendix
Thomas's theory of "mechanism"
The Lewis Principle - The famous American medical scientist
Lewis Thomas, after a lifetime of medical practice, has a wonderful
discussion on this subject: "I believe that the record of the last half
century has established two universal principles of human disease."
First, we must know more about the underlying mechanism of the
disease before we can really take effective action. You have to know
that diplococcus pneumoniae causes lobar pneumonia in order to
think about antibiotics, you don't have to know all the details, you
don't even have to know how diplococcus pneumoniae causes lung
damage, but you know where it is and it makes the decision.
Second, every disease has a single key mechanism that overrides
all others. If you can find it and figure out how to deal with it, you can
control the disorder. This generalization is difficult to prove and prone
to controversy, rather than a scientific statement. It might as well be a
strong hunch, but I believe the record so far tends to support that
hunch. The most complex diseases I know of that involve multiple
cells, multiple tissues, and multiple organs are stage III syphilis,
chronic tuberculosis, and intractable anemia. In each case, at least
three organs and tissues are involved, and each organ, each tissue,seems to be influenced by many environmental factors. Until they
were scientifically evaluated, each was considered to be what we now
call a "multifactorial" disease. It is too complex to allow one to
consider any single mechanism, but when all the necessary facts are
in hand, it is clear that by shutting down one thing -- Helicobacter,
tuberculosis, or that particular vitamin deficiency -- the whole set of
disordered and seemingly unrelated mechanisms can be shut down at
once." Thomas's two universal principles: underlying mechanisms and
the "multifactorial" influence of environmental factors The essence of
a single mechanism is a prediction and formulation of the
microecology. Because, he stressed, "We know very little about
ourselves. What matters most about how we function and what place
we occupy is our ignorance of this vast, incredible living system in
which we are rooted as working parts. We don't understand nature,
not at all."
Thomas's theory of "mechanism" is an excerpt of the discussion
of "mechanism" in "The Praise of Cellular Life" (Part 1 to 99 of the first
part of the book), and its own mechanism theory:
Thomas on "Mechanism"
1. We live in a Mosaic of dancing viruses that, like bees, dart
from organism to organism, from plant to insect to mammal to me
and back again, and into the sea, hugging pieces of this genome,
pulling on pieces of that genome, scions of dna, Passing on genetic
traits like dishes at a big dinner party. They may be the mechanism by
which new, mutant dna circulates most widely among us. If this is the
case, then the strange viral diseases to which we in the medical field
must focus so much attention can be seen as accidents, as an
oversight.
Second, even when the situation calls for a win or a loss, the
transaction need not be a battle. Marine
The indifference shown by members of several species of
coelenterate fans to one another suggests that the mechanism for
maintaining individuality must have existed long before the evolution
of immune mechanisms. The fans always grow close together in
clumps, forming clumps of branches, but they do not merge with each
other. If they did, their forms would be a mess. theodor (j.l.) showed
in a series of beautiful experiments that when two individuals of thesame species are placed together in close contact, the smaller one
always disintegrates first. This self-destruction comes from a cracking
mechanism that is completely controlled by the smaller ones. It was
not thrown out of the field, it was not defeated by force, it was not
defeated by fire, it was just a voluntary exit. It is not necessarily
comforting to know that such things happen in the biological world,
but it is at least comforting to be surprised.
The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts in
plants (which, surprisingly, also live in the straws of giant clams and
lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, there is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cells
regardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Had it not been for these rather diligent mechanisms, we might
have evolved into a floating syncytium that covered the earth, and
not a single flower would have grown.
In a recent article in Nature, ziman,j.m., noted that "the
invention of a mechanism for systematically making available to the
world the fragmentary knowledge acquired in scientific work must be
regarded as a pivotal event in the history of modern science."
5. It is said that a well-trained hound can accurately follow the
footsteps of a man wearing shoes, even if he crosses open ground
where countless other people's footprints have been left, if the dog is
first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you had to come up with a
research and development plan for a National Human Odor Research
Institute (which could be established as a joint venture between the
budgets of the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal
Communications Commission), it would be an excellent problem to
start with. It may also result in sub-projects that we would like to see
federally funded research done. If it is true, as the novel suggests,
that clever dogs can smell the difference between a person and
anyone else, it may be explained by differences in the geometry of
the 10-carbon molecule, or by differences in the relative
concentrations of several confounding pheromones. If this is true,
then it should be of interest to those who study immunology. They
have long claimed, like staking out ownership, that they have figured
out the mechanisms that distinguish this from this. Perhaps the
immune mechanism, which is surprisingly sensitive and preciseenough to detect molecules as small as semi-antigens, represents
another way of detecting the same marker. A person's best friend can
be used to sniff out organization-compatible suppliers, etc. As long as
we can succeed in maintaining research activity at this level, and
perhaps in diverting everyone's attention away from other aspects by
releasing large amounts of money, we may not be in trouble.
Other animals possess similar signaling mechanisms. Groups of
ants can smell the difference between their own ants and others as
they crawl along the road. Ants swarm through the streets, leaving
tracks that close friends can follow, but others can't.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 245
The animals around us have such wonderful sensory
technologies. Because of this, we feel some inferiority, they have we
do not. Sometimes, in order to eliminate this sense of loss (or
perceived loss), we comfort ourselves with the fact that we have long
since evolved to leave these primitive mechanisms behind. We tend
to think of the olfactory bulb as some sort of archaeological discovery,
and to refer to the ancient olfactory regions of the human brain as if
they were elderly, deranged relatives in need of a hobby.
The olfactory receptors used for communication between
different animals are essential for the establishment of symbiotic
systems. The crab and anemone recognize each other as companions
by their molecular configuration, as do the anemone and its symbiotic
teenage fish. Similar devices are also used for self-defence, such as
limpet, which defends carnivorous starfish by turning its sheath
outward, depriving the starfish of a foothold; Limpets can sense a
particular starfish protein. To be fair, all starfish make this protein and
release it into their environment. This system is clearly an ancient one,
much older than the antibody immune sensing that we now rely so
heavily on to recognize each other. Recently, it has been known that
the genes that mark the self by cell antigens are closely related to
those that underlie the immune response through antibody formation.
It's possible that antibody creation comes from an early sensory
mechanism needed for symbiosis, which may be partly used to keep
symbiosis from getting out of control.
The very general system of chemical communication between allliving things, whether plant or animal, has been called "allelochemics"
(interspecific chemistry) by whittaker,r.h. Every life form uses a signal
of one kind or another to announce to other creatures around it that
it is near, to draw boundaries to intruders, or to send out a signal of
welcome to potential co-organisms. The overall effect is a coordinated
mechanism for regulating growth rates and territorial occupation. This
was apparently used to equalize the Earth.
Later, he vividly recalled the experience. He was so amazed at
the extraordinary peace, calmness, and absence of pain associated
with death. So he created a theory that all animals have a protective
physiological mechanism that kicks in at the edge of death, bringing
them to the other shore in a cloud of calm.
Only once have I ever seen the pain of death, and that was in a
person with rabies. For twenty-four hours he was perfectly aware of
every step of the process of his own disintegration, right up to the last
breath. In the particular neuropathology of rabid people, it seems
that the protective mechanism has encountered obstacles and is not
turned on.
12. I am surprised to think that there is nothing wrong with
death. But perhaps no surprise. Death is, after all, one of the oldest
and most basic of biological functions, and the mechanism by which it
is formed is equally subtle: genetic information conducive to the
preservation of biological characteristics guides living things through
every step of death, as we are accustomed to all the other key
activities of life.
13. Where did consciousness go? Did it simply fall down, lost in
the humus, and become waste? Given nature's tendency to employ
complex and unintelligible mechanisms, the disappearance of
consciousness seems unnatural to me. I prefer to think that it
somehow separated from the filaments it was hanging on, and then
It retracts like a breath into its original membrane and becomes a
new memory of the biosphere nervous system, but I have no data to
prove it.
watson,j.a.l., nel,j.j.c. and hewitt, p.h., once collected large
numbers of termites from the wild and observed them together,
either in groups or in pairs. Termites placed in groups become
increasingly friendly and active, but show no inclination to lay eggs ormate; Instead, they reduced their water intake, focused on losing
weight, and increased mitochondrial metabolic activity in their flight
muscles. The congregating termites are constantly touching each
other with tentacles, and this seems to be the central control
mechanism. The important thing is to be touched, not to be touched.
Without antennae, any termite can still become a termite in the
colony, as long as it is frequently enough touched by other termites.
"It is not surprising that many analogies have been drawn
between social insects and human society. Fundamentally, however,
these analogies are either wrong or meaningless. For the behavior of
insects is strictly shaped and determined by the directive mechanism
of heaven; They have little or no understanding and capacity for
learning, and they lack the capacity to develop social traditions based
on the accumulated experience of many generationsContact to
communicate with each other; Organelles send messages to other
organelles. All this is going on, and we're not whispering anything to
them. The whole arrangement is an ecosystem in which the operation
of each part is conditioned by the state and activity of all the other
parts. Things usually go smoothly, and this is a foolproof mechanism.
Good intentions, but bring fatal results. This reaction mechanism
itself is quite good, but when used properly, its effect on a single
bacterial invasion is impressive: it calls the blood cells to the scene,
ejects the coagulable proteins, the bacteria become ensnagged and
incapacitated, and the whole thing is done. Only when encountering
signals from large amounts of endotoxin free molecules reminds the
body of the presence of large amounts of vibrio
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
Big Bang Global Life ") 247
At that moment, the horseshoe crab panicked, and suddenly
used all the means of self-defense, which destroyed itself.
I think it is probable that most of our diseases are thus acquired.
Sometimes the mechanism of indiscriminate killing is immune, but as
in the case of the horseshoe crab, it is often a more ancient memory.
We tear ourselves to pieces because of signals, and we are more
vulnerable to those signals than to any carnivorous herd. In effect, we
are at the mercy of our own Pentagon. Most of the time.
If language is at the heart of our social existence, bringing ustogether and covering us with the edifice of meaning. It may be said
with equal confidence, then, that art and music are the effects of the
same genetically determined universal mechanism. It's not a bad
thing to do this together. If that makes us social creatures, like ants,
then at least I (or should I say at least we?) I won't mind.
Viruses, formerly thought of as single-minded agents of disease
and death, are now taking on the appearance of active genes. The
process of evolution is still an endless, tedious biological game in
which only the winner stays at the table, but the rules of play seem to
be getting more flexible. We live in a matrix of dancing viruses that,
like bees, dart from organism to organism, from plant to insect to
mammal to me and back again, to the sea, hugging a few pieces of
this genome, pulling on a few pieces of that genome, scions
transplanted with dna, Passing on genetic traits like dishes at a big
dinner party. They may be the mechanism by which new, mutant dna
circulates most widely among us. If this is the case, then the strange
viral diseases to which we in the medical field must focus so much
attention can be seen as accidents, as an oversight.
23. Even when circumstances call for a win or a loss, the
transaction need not be a battle. The indifference shown by members
of several species of Marine coelenterate fans to one another
suggests that the mechanism for maintaining individuality must have
existed long before the evolution of immune mechanisms. The fans
always grow close together in clumps, forming clumps of branches,
but they do not merge with each other. If they did, their forms would
be a mess. theodor (j.l.) showed in a series of beautiful experiments
that when two individuals of the same species are placed together in
close contact, the smaller one always disintegrates first. This
self-destruction comes from a cracking mechanism that is completely
controlled by the smaller ones. It was not thrown out of the field, it
was not defeated by force, it was not defeated by fire, it was just a
voluntary exit. It is not necessarily comforting to know that such
things happen in the biological world, but it is at least comforting to
be surprised.
The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts in
plants (which, surprisingly, also live in the straws of giant clams and
lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, it is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cellsregardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Without these rather diligent mechanisms, we might have
evolved into a kind of floating syncytium,
Cover the earth, then, not even a flower on the earth will grow
out.
Communication systems used in science should provide a simple
and easy to operate model for the study of the mechanisms of
information accumulation in human society.
As ziman,j.m. noted in a recent article in Nature, "The invention
of a mechanism for the systematic dissemination of the fragmentary
pieces of knowledge obtained in scientific work must be regarded as a
pivotal event in the history of modern science."
He continued:
A journal brings together all sorts of Knowledge of general
interest is passed from one researcher to another... . A typical
scientific paper always sees itself as just another sawtooth on a big
saw-not important in itself, but a molecule in a bigger project. [This
technique, which has brought so many small contributions into the
knowledge base of mankind, has been the secret of Western science
since the seventeenth century, for it has acquired a common,
collective power far greater than that which any individual can emit]
(emphasis added by the author).
By changing a few terms and lowering the tone, this paragraph
can be used to describe the work of building a termite nest.
One thing is striking: the word explore does not apply to the
searching side of exploration, but has its roots in the sounds we make
while exploring (from Latin explorare, meaning "to shout out"). We
like to think that scientific inquiry is a solitary, contemplative affair.
Yes, in the first few stages. But later, sooner or later, when the work is
about to be completed, we always call to each other as we explore,
exchange information, publish articles, write letters to the editor,
submit papers, and shout at any discovery.
26. It has been said that a well-trained hound can accurately
follow the footsteps of a man wearing shoes, even if he crosses open
ground where countless other people's footprints have been left, if
the dog is first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you had to comeup with a research and development plan for a National Human Odor
Research Institute (which could be established as a joint venture
between the budgets of the Food and Drug Administration and the
Federal Communications Commission), it would be an excellent
problem to start with. It may also result in sub-projects that we would
like to see federally funded research done. If it is true, as the novel
suggests, that a clever dog can sniff out the difference between a
human being and anyone else, it may be explained by differences in
the geometry of the 10-carbon molecule, or by differences in the
relative concentrations of several confounding pheromones. If this is
true, then it should be of interest to those who study immunology.
They have long claimed, like staking out ownership, that they have
figured out the mechanisms that distinguish this from this. Perhaps
the surprisingly sensitive and precise immune mechanisms that
detect molecules as small as haptens represent another way to detect
the same marker. A person's best friend can be used to sniff out
organization-compatible suppliers, etc. As long as we can succeed in
maintaining research activity at this level, and perhaps in diverting
everyone's attention away from other aspects by releasing large
amounts of money, we may not be in trouble.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 249
27. Other animals are endowed with similar signaling
mechanisms. Groups of ants can smell the difference between their
own ants and others as they crawl along the road. Ants swarm
through the streets, leaving tracks that close friends can follow, but
others can't.
Some ants are carnivorous ants, born with the ability to detect
the tracks of the ants they are used to capturing as slaves, and stalk
their victims until they reach their nests, releasing special odors that
terrorize the colony.
Phoxinus and catfish can recognize each member of their own
species by their own unique smell. It's hard to think that there's a
solitary, independent, existentialist phoxinus that can be picked out
by itself and recognized; A phoxinus in a colony behaves like the sameinterchangeable parts of an animal, but the individual still exists.
All the animals around us have such wonderful sensory
technologies. Because of this, we feel some inferiority, they have we
do not. Sometimes, in order to eliminate this sense of loss (or
perceived loss), we comfort ourselves with the fact that we have long
since evolved to leave these primitive mechanisms behind. We tend
to think of the olfactory bulb as some sort of archaeological discovery,
and to refer to the ancient olfactory regions of the human brain as if
they were elderly, deranged relatives in need of a hobby.
29. The olfactory receptors used for communication between
different animals are essential for the establishment of symbiotic
systems. The crab and anemone recognize each other as companions
by their molecular configuration, as do the anemone and its symbiotic
teenage fish. Similar devices are also used for self-defence, such as
limpet, which defends carnivorous starfish by turning its sheath
outward, depriving the starfish of a foothold; Limpet senses a
particular starfish egg white. To be fair, all starfish make this protein
and release it into their environment. This system is clearly an ancient
one, much older than the immune perception of antibodies that we
now rely so heavily on to recognize each other. Recently, it has been
known that the genes that mark the self by cell antigens are closely
related to those that produce an immune response through antibody
formation. It's possible that antibody creation comes from an early
sensory mechanism needed for symbiosis, which may be partly used
to keep symbiosis from getting out of control.
The very common system of chemical communication between
all living things, whether plant or animal, has been called
"allelochemics" (interspecific chemistry) by whittaker,r.h. Every life
form uses a signal of one kind or another to announce to other
creatures around it that it is near, to draw boundaries to intruders, or
to send out a signal of welcome to potential co-organisms. The overall
effect is a coordinated mechanism for regulating growth rates and
territorial occupation. This was apparently used to equalize the Earth.
Later, he vividly recalled the experience. He was so amazed at
the extraordinary peace, calmness, and absence of pain associated
with death. So he created a theory that said
All animals have a protective physiological mechanism that kicksin at the edge of death, carrying them to the other shore in a cloud of
calm.
Only once have I ever seen the pain of death, and that was in a
person with rabies. For twenty-four hours he was perfectly aware of
every step of the process of his own disintegration, right up to the last
breath. In the particular neuropathology of rabid people, it seems
that the protective mechanism has encountered obstacles and is not
turned on.
I am surprised to think that there is nothing wrong with death.
But maybe you shouldn't be surprised. Death is, after all, one of the
oldest and most basic of biological functions, and the mechanism by
which it is formed is equally subtle, with genetic information
conducive to the preservation of biological characteristics guiding
organisms through every step of death, as we are accustomed to all
the other key activities of life.
34. Where did consciousness go? Did it just fall down instantly,
lost in the humus, and become waste? Given nature's tendency to
employ complex and unintelligible mechanisms, the disappearance of
consciousness seems unnatural to me. I would like to think that it
somehow separated from its hanging filaments and then retracted
like a breath into the membrane from which it came, becoming a new
memory of the biosphere nervous system, but I have no data to prove
it.
35. watson,j.a.l., nel,j.j.c. and hewitt, p.h., once collected large
numbers of termites from the wild and observed them together,
either in groups or in pairs. Termites placed in groups become
increasingly friendly and active, but show no inclination to lay eggs or
mate; Instead, they reduced their water intake, focused on losing
weight, and increased mitochondrial metabolic activity in their flight
muscles. The congregating termites are constantly touching each
other with tentacles, and this seems to be the central control
mechanism. The important thing is to be touched, not to be touched.
Without antennae, any termite can still become a termite in the
colony, as long as it is frequently enough touched by other termites.
It is not surprising that many analogies have been drawn
between social insects and human society. Fundamentally, however,
these analogies are either wrong or meaningless. Because insect
behavior is strictly shaped and determined by innate directivemechanisms; They have little or no understanding and capacity for
learning, and they lack an ability to develop social traditions based on
the accumulated experience of many generations."
In recent years, some new fields have been expanded and
strengthened, biofilms, immunology, genetics, and cell regulatory
mechanisms are developing rapidly.
38. On a hot midsummer weekend, you can see how the
mechanism of domination works: the beach is crowded, and people
have to look for a place to rest their legs. But no matter what, there
are always a lot of people standing. Biologists seem to enjoy standing
on the beach, talking to each other, gesticulating, bending down to
scratch shapes in the sand. By nightfall, the sand was crisscrossed
with a jumble of vertical and horizontal coordinates and curves. It's all
about explaining things in nature.
39. The gunpowder our bodies use against germs is so violent,
and involves so many defense mechanisms, that they are more
dangerous to us than the invaders. We were surrounded by explosive
devices; We all
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 251
It's covered in landmines.
It's the message from the bacteria that overwhelms us.
40. Viruses, previously seen as single-minded agents of disease
and death, are now gradually taking on the appearance of active
genes. The process of evolution is still an endless, tedious biological
game in which only the winner stays at the table, but the rules of play
seem to be getting more flexible. We live in a Mosaic of dancing
viruses that, like bees, dart from organism to organism, from plant to
insect to mammal to me and back again, to the sea, hugging pieces of
this genome, pulling on pieces of that genome, scions of dna, Passing
on genetic traits like dishes at a large banquet. They may be a
mechanism for making newIn a series of beautiful experiments, it has
been shown that when two individuals of the same species are placed
together in close contact, the smaller one always disintegrates first.
This self-destruction comes from a cracking mechanism that is
completely controlled by the smaller ones. It was not thrown out of
the field, it was not defeated by force, it was not defeated by fire, itwas just a voluntary exit. It is not necessarily comforting to know that
such things happen in the biological world, but it is at least comforting
to be surprised.
42. The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts in
plants (which, surprisingly, also live in the straws of giant clams and
lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, it is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cells
regardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Without these rather diligent mechanisms, we might have
evolved into a kind of floating syncytium that covered the earth, and
not a single flower would have grown on the earth.
Communication systems used in science should provide a simple
and easy to operate model for the study of the mechanisms of
information accumulation in human society.
As ziman,j.m. noted in a recent article in Nature, "The invention
of a mechanism for the systematic dissemination of the fragmentary
pieces of knowledge obtained in scientific work must be regarded as a
pivotal event in the history of modern science."
44. It is said that a well-trained hound can accurately follow the
footsteps of a man wearing shoes, even if he crosses open ground
where countless other people's footprints have been left, if the dog is
first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you have to use the
National Human Odor Research Institute (FDA)
And the Federal Communications Commission's budget joint
venture) to come up with a research and development plan, which
would be a groundbreaking excellent problem. It may also result in
sub-projects that we would like to see federally funded research done.
If it is true, as the novel suggests, that a clever dog can sniff out the
difference between a human being and anyone else, it may be
explained by differences in the geometry of the 10-carbon molecule,
or by differences in the relative concentrations of several confounding
pheromones. If this is true, then it should be of interest to those who
study immunology. They have long claimed, like staking out
ownership, that they have figured out the mechanisms that
distinguish this from this. Perhaps the surprisingly sensitive and
precise immune mechanisms that detect molecules as small ashaptens represent another way to detect the same marker. A person's
best friend can be used to sniff out organization-compatible suppliers,
etc. As long as we can succeed in maintaining research activity at this
level, and perhaps in diverting everyone's attention away from other
aspects by releasing large amounts of money, we may not be in
trouble.
45. Other animals are endowed with similar signaling
mechanisms. Groups of ants can smell the difference between their
own ants and others as they crawl along the road. Ants swarm
through the streets, leaving tracks that close friends can follow, but
others can't.
The animals around us have such wonderful sensory
technologies. Because of this, we feel some inferiority, they have we
do not. Sometimes, in order to eliminate this sense of loss (or
perceived loss), we comfort ourselves with the fact that we have long
since evolved to leave these primitive mechanisms behind. We tend
to think of the olfactory bulb as some sort of archaeological discovery,
and to refer to the ancient olfactory regions of the human brain as if
they were elderly, deranged relatives in need of a hobby.
47. The olfactory receptors used for communication between
different animals are essential for the establishment of a symbiotic
system. The crab and anemone recognize each other as companions
by their molecular configuration, as do the anemone and its symbiotic
teenage fish. Similar devices are also used for self-defence, such as
limpet, which defends carnivorous starfish by turning its sheath
outward, depriving the starfish of a foothold; Limpet senses a
particular starfish egg white. To be fair, all starfish make this protein
and release it into their environment. This system is clearly an ancient
one, much older than the immune perception of antibodies that we
now rely so heavily on to recognize each other. Recently, it has been
known that the genes that mark the self by cell antigens are closely
related to those that produce an immune response through antibody
formation. It's possible that antibody creation comes from an early
sensory mechanism needed for symbiosis, which may be partly used
to keep symbiosis from getting out of control.
The very general system of chemical communication between all
living things, whether plant or animal, has been called "allelochemics"
(interspecific chemistry) by whittaker,r.h. (188-1887). Every life formuses a signal of one kind or another to announce to other creatures
around it that it is near, to draw boundaries to intruders, or to send
out a signal of welcome to potential co-organisms. The overall effect
is a coordinated mechanism for regulating growth rates and territorial
occupation. This was apparently used to equalize the Earth.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 253
Later, he vividly recalled the experience. He was so amazed at
the extraordinary peace, calmness, and absence of pain associated
with death. So he created a theory that all animals have a protective
physiological mechanism that kicks in at the edge of death, bringing
them to the other shore in a cloud of calm.
Fifty,
I've only ever seen the pain of death once, and that was in a
person with rabies. For twenty-four hours he was perfectly aware of
every step of the process of his own disintegration, right up to the last
breath. In the particular neuropathology of the rabies patient, it
seems that the protective mechanism has encountered obstacles and
is not turned on.
I am surprised to think that there is nothing wrong with death.
But maybe you shouldn't be surprised. Death is, after all, one of the
oldest and most basic of biological functions, and the mechanism by
which it is formed is equally subtle, with genetic information
conducive to the preservation of biological characteristics guiding
organisms through every step of death, as we are accustomed to all
the other key activities of life.
52. Where did consciousness go? Did it just fall down instantly,
lost in the humus, and become waste? Given nature's tendency to
employ complex and unintelligible mechanisms, the disappearance of
consciousness seems unnatural to me. I would like to think that it
somehow separated from its hanging filaments and then retracted
like a breath into the membrane from which it came, becoming a new
memory of the biosphere nervous system, but I have no data to prove
it.
Fifty-three
So where the hell did consciousness go? Did it just fall down
instantly, lost in the humus, and become waste? Given nature'stendency to employ complex and unintelligible mechanisms, the
disappearance of consciousness strikes me as unnatural. I would like
to think that it somehow separated from its hanging filaments and
retracted like a breath into the membrane from which it came,
becoming a new memory of the biosphere nervous system, but I have
no data to prove it.
"It is not surprising that many analogies have been drawn
between social insects and human society. Fundamentally, however,
these analogies are either wrong or meaningless. Because insect
behavior is strictly shaped and determined by innate directive
mechanisms; They have little or no understanding and capacity for
learning, and they lack an ability to develop social traditions based on
the accumulated experience of many generations."
The invertebrate eye was discovered at a Marine biology
experiment station as an optical instrument that paved the way for
modern visual physiology. The giant nerve axons of the Woods Hole
squid became the foundation for today's amazing neurobiology.
Genetic biology and reproductive biology are recognized and defined
here as sciences. These two sciences began with the study of sea
urchin eggs and have steadily developed since then. The modeling of
Marine organisms was crucial in the early years of muscle structure
and function research, and the study of muscles has become a major
preoccupation of Marine biology laboratory stations. Ecology was a
serious, diligent science here, decades before the rest of us
discovered it.
In recent years, some new fields have been expanded and
strengthened, biofilms, immunology, genetics, and cellular regulatory
mechanisms are developing rapidly.
On a hot midsummer weekend, you can see how the mechanism
of domination works: the beach is crowded, and people have to
shuffle around on tiptoes to find a place to rest their legs. But no
matter what, there are always a lot of people standing. Biologists
seem to enjoy standing on the beach, talking to each other,
gesticulating, bending down to scratch shapes in the sand. By nightfall,
the sand was crisscrossed with a jumble of vertical and horizontal
coordinates and curves. It's all about explaining things in nature.
57. The rules are different for the complex, coordinated, andingenious operations we carry out inside our bodies. We don't have to
learn anything. Our smooth muscle cells are born with a complete set
of instructions and do not need any help from us, but work their way
along according to their own plans, regulating the diameter of blood
vessels, moving food through the intestines, opening and closing
pipes according to the requirements of the whole system; Secretory
cells make their products in secret; Contraction of the heart;
Dilatation, hormones are sent out to react silently with cell
membranes, turning adenylyl cyclase, prostaglandins, and other
signals on and off; Cells communicate with each other by touching
each other; Organelles send messages to other organelles. All this is
going on, and we're not whispering anything to them. The whole
arrangement is an ecosystem in which the operation of each part is
conditioned by the state and activity of all the other parts. Things
usually go smoothly, and this is a foolproof mechanism.
58. On closer inspection, the most sinister microbes - those that
really seem to wish us ill - are more like bystanders, vagrants, and
occasional strangers seeking refuge from the cold. They invade the
human body whenever they get the chance to reproduce, some of
them will reach the deepest tissues of our body, break into the
bloodstream. But it is our reaction to their presence that makes us
sick.
The gunpowder our bodies use to fight bacteria is so strong, and
involves so many defense mechanisms, that it poses a greater danger
to us than an intruder. We were surrounded by explosive devices;
We're covered in mines.
Intentions are good, but bring fatal results. This reaction
mechanism itself is quite good, but when used properly, its effect on a
single bacterial invasion is impressive: it calls the blood cells to the
scene, ejects the coagulable protein, the bacteria become ensnagged
and incapacitated, and the whole thing is over. It is only when the
signal of a large number of endotoxin free molecules reminds the
body of the presence of a large number of vibrio bacteria that the
horseshoes panic and suddenly use all the means of self-defense,
which destroys itself.
60. This process is basically a response to a signal, somewhat like
the exokinins secreted by slave ants, which cause panic in the victim
ant colony, leading to confusion and disintegration of the victim antcolony.
I think that's probably how we get most of our diseases.
Sometimes the mechanism of indiscriminate killing is immune, but as
in the case of the horseshoe crab, it is often a more ancient memory.
We tear ourselves to pieces because of signals, and we are more
vulnerable to these signals than in any carnivore
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 255
The herd is still vulnerable. In effect, we are at the mercy of our
own Pentagon. Mostly yes.
Aye.
If language is at the heart of our social existence, bringing us
together and covering us with the edifice of meaning. It may be said
with equal confidence, then, that art and music are the effects of the
same genetically determined universal mechanism. It's not a bad
thing to do this together. If that makes us social creatures, like ants,
then at least I (or should I say at least we?) I won't mind.
Sixty-two
If so, this means that the ability of the human brain to produce
things other than parts of speech is, in some essential sense,
pre-coded. Since everything else we know about human behavior is
derived from the central mechanism of language, this same set of
genes also regulates, at least indirectly, the surprising behavior of a
few hundred people packed together in a concert hall, listening
silently, with their ears sideways, and thoughtfully, as if receiving
instructions; Or, people in a gallery, slowly moving forward, eyes
staring at the picture, no time to look at others, so engrossed, as if
reading some instructions.
63.
Like native bees, lymphocytes are genetically programmed to
patrol, but each of them seems to be allowed only one distinct idea.
They roam, feel, and monitor the organization. Because there are so
many of them, it is possible to make a collective guess that anything
antigenic on the surface of the Earth can be detected. But they can
only do things one idea at a time. They carry special information in
the receptors on the body surface, in the form of a question mark:
Is there a particular molecular configuration that I'm looking for?Biological information is essentially such that it not only accumulates
itself like energy, but also encourages people to seek out more
information. It's a mechanism that doesn't know how to kill people.
Sixty-four
Is there a particular molecular configuration that I'm looking for?
Biological information is essentially such that it not only accumulates
itself like energy, but also encourages people to seek out more
information. It's a mechanism that doesn't know how to kill people.
Lymphocytes apparently know all the foreign objects around
them, and some lymphocytes have special equipment that makes
them suitable for polymers that didn't exist but were later synthesized
by organic chemists in the lab. These cells can do more than just
predict reality; They obviously also have procedures for making bold
ideas.
65. Like native bees, lymphocytes are genetically programmed to
patrol, but each of them seems to be allowed only one distinct idea.
They roam, feel, and monitor the organization. Because there are so
many of them, it is possible to make a collective guess that anything
antigenic on the surface of the Earth can be detected. But they can
only do things one idea at a time. They're in receptors on the surface
of the body
Carries a special message in the form of a question mark:Is there
a particular molecular configuration that I'm looking for? Biological
information is essentially such that it not only accumulates itself like
energy, but also encourages people to seek out more information. It's
a mechanism that doesn't know how to kill people.
Sixty-six,
For this mechanism to be useful, the cells need to stay on point
with unerring precision. Any ambiguity, any vacillation, poses a
serious danger to these cells, and an even greater danger to their
owners. The slightest error will cause some reaction, and neighboring
cells will be regarded as foreign and involved in the reaction. One
theory is that the aging process may be caused by this accumulation
of errors, a gradual decline in the quality of information. This system
has no room for deviation.
67. For this mechanism to be useful, the cells must stay on point
with unerring precision. Any ambiguity, any vacillation, poses aserious danger to these cells, and an even greater danger to their
owners. The slightest error will cause some reaction, and neighboring
cells will be regarded as foreign and involved in the reaction. One
theory is that the aging process may be caused by this accumulation
of errors, a gradual decline in the quality of information. This system
has no room for deviation.
Some living things seem to never die. They just disappear whole
into their own offspring. A single cell is like that. One cell becomes
two, two becomes four, and so on, and after a while the last trace of
itself is gone. It's not death; If you put aside the mutation, then those
offspring are just the first cells, living again. There are some closing
stages in the life history of slime molds that look like death, but the
dry slug with its stalk and fruiting body is clearly the transitional tissue
of the developing animal. Swimming amoebic cells collectively use
this mechanism to produce more cells.
69. The essential blindness of the science of human behavior has
not yet been widely recognized. As we select new and valuable things
from scientific activity, we also keep finding that certain parts of the
activity seem to need better control, more efficiency, and less
unpredictability. We are willing to spend less and achieve the benefits
of investment on a more orderly and timely basis. The planners in
Washington tried to do something about it, and there were new
projects to organize all the scientific activity there, especially in
biomedicine.
We need to think about it. When scientific activity is at its best,
there is some almost uncontrollable biological mechanism at work.
This should not be ignored.
You can make a model of the city, but you will know that these
cities are beyond rational analysis; If you try to predict the future with
common sense, things get messier than they were before. This is
interesting, because cities are the places where human beings are
most concentrated, and all of them are trying to make an impact.
Cities seem to have a life of their own. If we don't understand how
cities work, we can't
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 257
Very deep understanding of human society as a whole.Still, you'd think there would be some way of understanding. The
human brain on Earth is clustered together like a unified, living system.
The trouble is that the flow of information is mostly one-way. We are
obsessed with entering information as quickly as possible, but lack
the sensory mechanism to take it back as much as possible. I confess
that I seldom feel what goes on in the mind of a human being, more
than I feel what goes on in the mind of an ant. If you think about it,
that might be a good starting point.
Seventy-one,
It may be that we are just beginning to learn to use this system,
and that our entire evolution as a species has almost all yet to come.
Perhaps the thoughts we produce today and travel rapidly between
our brains are like the jokes told simultaneously at dinner tables in
Hong Kong and Boston, like the sudden changes in our hairstyles, like
all the love songs that are popular today. They are only primitive
stages of more complex polymeric structures, comparable to the
prokaryotic cells that floated in shallow depressions early in evolution.
Later, when the time is right, there will be a fusion and symbiosis
between those pieces, and then we will see the eukaryotic thought,
the offspring of the thought, the great coral reef where the thought
grows together.
Such a mechanism already exists and can undoubtedly work,
although all products to date have been largely fragmented. But it has
to be said that, evolutionarily speaking, we have only been using our
brains for a very short time, only a few thousand years, whereas
human history may last for billions of years. For thousands of years,
the human mind has been scattered in patches all over the earth.
Such an exchange of ideas, perhaps with some regularity, dictates the
critical concentration and mass at which it can operate effectively. It is
only in this century that we have come so close to each other that we
have been able to begin to merge on a planetary scale, and from now
on that process can move forward rapidly.
72. You could say that the release of oxygen into the atmosphere
is the result of evolution. You could say the other way around that
evolution is the result of having oxygen. Whatever you say makes
sense. Once photosynthetic cells - probably the equivalent of today's
blue-green algae - emerged, the Earth's future breathing mechanism
was in place. Once upon a time, the level of oxygen in the atmosphereincreased to 1% of today's oxygen concentration, and the anaerobic
life on Earth was threatened, the next step was the inevitable
emergence of mutants with oxidation systems and atp (adenosine
triphosphate). With this, we have reached an explosive stage where
thousands of breathing life forms, including multicellular life forms,
can flourish.
Viruses, once thought of as single-minded agents of disease and
death, are now increasingly taking on the appearance of active genes.
The process of evolution is still an endless, tedious biological game in
which only the winner stays at the table, but the rules of play seem to
be getting more flexible. We live in an array of dancing viruses that,
like bees, dart from organism to organism, from plant to insect to
mammal to me and back again, to the sea, hugging pieces of genome
like this, pulling on pieces of genome like that, scions with dna grafted
on them, passing them around like a big feast
Dishes transmit genetic traits as well. They may be the
mechanism by which new, mutant dna circulates most widely among
us. If this is the case, then the strange viral diseases to which we in
the medical field must focus so much attention can be seen as
accidents, as an oversight.
74. Even when circumstances call for a win or a loss, the
transaction need not be a battle. The indifference shown by members
of several species of Marine coelenterate fans to one another
suggests that the mechanism for maintaining individuality must have
existed long before the evolution of immune mechanisms. The fans
always grow close together in clumps, forming clumps of branches,
but they do not merge with each other. If they did, their forms would
be a mess. theodor (j.l.) showed in a series of beautiful experiments
that when two individuals of the same species are placed together in
close contact, the smaller one always disintegrates first. This
self-destruction comes from a cracking mechanism that is completely
controlled by the smaller ones. It was not thrown out of the field, it
was not defeated by force, it was not defeated by fire, it was just a
voluntary exit. It is not necessarily comforting to know that such
things happen in the biological world, but it is at least comforting to
be surprised.
75. The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts inplants (which, surprisingly, also live in the straws of giant clams and
lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, it is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cells
regardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Without these rather diligent mechanisms, we might have
evolved into a kind of floating syncytium that covered the earth, and
not a single flower would have grown on the earth.
76. Although we are by any means the most social of all social
animals - more interdependent, more connected, more inseparable in
behavior than honeybees - we do not often feel our united
intelligence. We may, however, be connected to circuits in order to
store, process, and retrieve information, for this seems to be the most
basic and universal activity of all human affairs. Our biological
function may be to build some kind of hill. We have access to all the
information in the entire biosphere that comes to us in the basic unit
of the solar photon stream. When we know how these things
overcome randomness and rearrange themselves into things like
elastics, quantum mechanics, and the late Quartet, we may have a
clearer idea of how to move forward. The circuit seemed to be there,
even if it wasn't always on.
Communication systems used in science should provide simple
and easy to operate models for studying the mechanisms of
information accumulation in human society.
77. It is said that a well-trained hound can accurately follow the
footsteps of a man wearing shoes, even if he crosses open ground
where countless other people's footprints have been left, if the dog is
first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you had to come up with a
research and development plan for a National Human Odor Research
Institute (which could be established as a joint venture between the
budgets of the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal
Communications Commission), it would be an excellent problem to
start with. It may also result in sub-projects that we would like to see
federally funded research done. If the novel is true, the clever dog can
sniff
Basic Theory of Whole Life Science I (" The Law of Whole Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 259The difference between a person and anyone else may be
explained by differences in the molecular geometry of the 10-carbon
atom, or by differences in the relative concentrations of several
confounding pheromones. If this is true, then it should be of interest
to those who study immunology. They have long claimed, like staking
out ownership, that they have figured out the mechanisms that
distinguish this from this. Perhaps the surprisingly sensitive and
precise immune mechanisms that detect molecules as small as
haptens represent another way to detect the same marker. A person's
best friend can be used to sniff out organization-compatible suppliers,
etc. As long as we can succeed in maintaining research activity at this
level, and perhaps in diverting everyone's attention away from other
aspects by releasing large amounts of money, we may not be in
trouble.
78. Animals possess a similar signaling mechanism. Groups of
ants can smell the difference between their own ants and others as
they crawl along the road. Ants swarm through the streets, leaving
tracks that close friends can follow, but others can't.
Some ants are carnivorous ants, born with the ability to detect
the tracks of the ants they are used to capturing as slaves, and stalk
their victims until they reach their nests, releasing special odors that
terrorize the colony.
Phoxinus and catfish can recognize each member of their own
species by their own unique smell. It's hard to think that there's a
solitary, independent, existentialist phoxinus that can be picked out
by itself and recognized; A phoxinus in a colony behaves like the same
interchangeable parts of an animal, but the individual still exists.
79. Leaving these primitive mechanisms behind. We tend to
think of the olfactory bulb as some sort of archaeological discovery,
and to refer to the ancient olfactory regions of the human brain as if
they were elderly, deranged relatives in need of a hobby.
But our reality may be better than we think. The average person
can detect a few molecules of butyl mercaptan, while most can sense
a slight musk. Steroidal compounds are strangely aromatic. They give
off a variety of musk-like, sexy odors. Women are acutely aware of
the smell of a synthetic steroid called cyclopentaolide, while most
men are not. Everyone can smell ants, and the word pismire was
originally coined for this smell (pis = piss: to piss, mire: ant).80. The olfactory receptors used for communication between
different animals are essential for the establishment of a symbiotic
system. The crab and anemone recognize each other as companions
by their molecular configuration, as do the anemone and its symbiotic
teenage fish. Similar devices are also used for self-defence, such as
the limpet, which defends a carnivorous starfish by turning its sheath
outward, so that the starfish loses a foothold; Limpets can sense a
particular starfish protein. To be fair, all starfish make this protein and
release it into their environment. This system is clearly an ancient one,
much older than the antibody immune sensing that we now rely so
heavily on to recognize each other. Recently, it has been known that
cellular antigens mark those genes of the self and those bases for an
immune response through antibody formation
Because of the close connection. It's possible that antibody
creation comes from an early sensory mechanism needed for
symbiosis, which may be partly used to keep symbiosis from getting
out of control.
The very general system of chemical communication between all
living things, whether plant or animal, has been called "allelochemics"
(interspecific chemistry) by whittaker,r.h. Every life form uses a signal
of one kind or another to announce to other creatures around it that
it is near, to draw boundaries to intruders, or to send out a signal of
welcome to potential co-organisms. The overall effect is a coordinated
mechanism for regulating growth rates and territorial occupation. This
was apparently used to equalize the Earth.
Later, he vividly recalled the experience. He was so amazed at
the extraordinary peace, calmness, and absence of pain associated
with death. So he created a theory that all animals have a protective
physiological mechanism that kicks in at the edge of death, bringing
them to the other shore in a cloud of calm.
83, the protection mechanism encountered obstacles, did not
open.
From the growing number of heart disease patients, we have
new opportunities to learn more first-hand about the physiology of
death. Some patients go through that whole process and come back
to life. From what was learned from the first people to come back
from suspended death from a heart attack, which has come to beknown as Lazarus syndrome, Osler seemed to be right that those who
remembered all or part of the experience did not recall any fear or
pain. Several of them appeared to be dead, but were awake the
whole time, feeling a strange sense of detachment. There areFrom
the growing number of heart disease patients, we have new
opportunities to learn more first-hand about the physiology of death.
Some patients go through that whole process and come back to life.
From what was learned from the first people to come back from
suspended death from a heart attack, which has come to be known as
Lazarus syndrome, Osler seemed to be right that those who
remembered all or part of the experience did not recall any fear or
pain. Several of them appeared to be dead, but were awake the
whole time, feeling a strange sense of detachment. A man had a
coronary infarction and his heart stopped beating in front of a
hospital, which meant he was dead. A few minutes later, his heart was
restarted with the stimulation of the electrodes and he was breathing
again. One of the strangest things he described was that there were
so many people around him, coming and going so quickly, and moving
his body so excitedly, and all he felt was calm.
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" Global Plate Genetic Law -
The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 261
85. Even when circumstances call for a win or a loss, the
transaction need not be a battle. The indifference shown by members
of several species of Marine coelenterate fans to one another
suggests that the mechanism for maintaining individuality must have
existed long before the evolution of immune mechanisms. The fans
always grow close together in clumps, forming clumps of branches,
but they do not merge with each other. If they did, their forms would
be a mess. theodor (j.l.) showed in a series of beautiful experiments
that when two individuals of the same species are placed together in
close contact, the smaller one always disintegrates first. This
self-destruction comes from a cracking mechanism that is completely
controlled by the smaller ones. It was not thrown out of the field, it
was not defeated by force, it was not defeated by fire, it was just a
voluntary exit. It is not necessarily comforting to know that such
things happen in the biological world, but it is at least comforting to
be surprised.The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts in
plants (which, surprisingly, also live in the straws of giant clams and
lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, it is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cells
regardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Without these rather diligent mechanisms, we might have
evolved into a kind of floating syncytium that covered the earth, and
not a single flower would have grown on the earth.
We may feel that it is possible to accept other life forms from
other planets simply out of kindness.
The communication systems used in science should provide a
simple and easy to operate model for the study of the mechanisms of
information accumulation in human society.
As ziman,j.m. noted in a recent article in Nature, "The invention
of a mechanism for the systematic dissemination of the fragmentary
pieces of knowledge obtained in scientific work must be regarded as a
pivotal event in the history of modern science."
It is said that a well-trained hound can accurately follow the
footsteps of a man wearing shoes, even if he crosses open ground
where countless other people's footprints have been left, if the dog is
first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you had to come up with a
research and development plan for a National Human Odor Research
Institute (which could be established as a joint venture between the
budgets of the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal
Communications Commission), it would be an excellent problem to
start with. It may also result in sub-projects that we would like to see
federally funded research done. If it is true, as the novel suggests,
that a clever dog can sniff out the difference between a human being
and anyone else, it may be explained by differences in the geometry
of the 10-carbon molecule, or by differences in the relative
concentrations of several confounding pheromones. If this is true,
then it should be of interest to those who study immunology. They
have long claimed, like staking out ownership, that they have figured
out the mechanisms that distinguish this from this. Perhaps the
surprisingly sensitive and precise immune mechanisms that detect
molecules as small as haptens represent another way to detect the
same marker. A person's best friend can be used to sniff outorganization-compatible suppliers, etc. As long as we can successfully
will study
By maintaining this level of activity, and perhaps succeeding in
diverting everyone's attention from other aspects by releasing large
amounts of money, we might not be in trouble.
89. It is said that a well-trained hound can follow the footsteps of
a man wearing shoes without error, even if he crosses open ground
where countless other people's footprints have been left, if the dog is
first allowed to smell the man's clothes. If you had to come up with a
research and development plan for a National Human Odor Research
Institute (which could be established as a joint venture between the
budgets of the Food and Drug Administration and the Federal
Communications Commission), it would be an excellent problem to
start with. It may also result in sub-projects that we would like to see
federally funded research done. If it is true, as the novel suggests,
that a clever dog can sniff out the difference between a human being
and anyone else, it may be explained by differences in the geometry
of the 10-carbon molecule, or by differences in the relative
concentrations of several confounding pheromones. If this is true,
then it should be of interest to those who study immunology. They
have long claimed, like staking out ownership, that they have figured
out the mechanisms that distinguish this from this. Perhaps the
surprisingly sensitive and precise immune mechanisms that detect
molecules as small as haptens represent another way to detect the
same marker. A person's best friend can be used to sniff out
organization-compatible suppliers, etc. As long as we can succeed in
maintaining research activity at this level, and perhaps in diverting
everyone's attention away from other aspects by releasing large
amounts of money, we may not be in trouble.
Ninety, we have not. Sometimes, in order to eliminate this sense
of loss (or perceived loss), we comfort ourselves with the fact that we
have long since evolved to leave these primitive mechanisms behind.
We tend to think of the olfactory bulb as some sort of archaeological
discovery, and to refer to the ancient olfactory regions of the human
brain as if they were elderly, deranged relatives in need of a hobby.
91. The very general system of chemical communication
between all living things, whether plant or animal, has been called"allelochemics" (interspecific chemistry) by whittaker,r.h. Every life
form uses a signal of one kind or another to announce to other
creatures around it that it is near, to draw boundaries to intruders, or
to send out a signal of welcome to potential co-organisms. The overall
effect is a coordinated mechanism for regulating growth rates and
territorial occupation. This was apparently used to equalize the Earth.
Later, he vividly recalled the experience. He was so amazed at
the extraordinary peace, calmness, and absence of pain associated
with death. So he created a theory that all animals have a protective
physiological mechanism that kicks in at the edge of death, bringing
them to the other shore in a cloud of calm.
Only once have I ever seen the pain of death, and that was in a
person with rabies. For twenty-four hours he was perfectly aware of
every step of the process of his own disintegration, right up to the last
breath. In the particular neuropathology of rabid people, it seems
that the protective mechanism has encountered obstacles and is not
turned on
I am surprised to think that there is nothing wrong with death.
But maybe
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 263
Shouldn't be surprised. Death, after all, is one of the oldest and
most basic biological functions, and it is formed by the same
mechanism
Attention to subtlety is the genetic information that helps
preserve biological characteristics to guide organisms through each
step of death, as we are accustomed to all other key activities of life.
But even so, if at the initial, local stage this transformation is a
coordinated, holistic and harmonious physiological process, one thing
remains to be explained, and that is the permanent disappearance of
consciousness. Are we gonna be stuck with this forever?
95. Where did consciousness go? Did it just fall down instantly,
lost in the humus, and become waste? Given nature's tendency to
employ complex and unintelligible mechanisms, the disappearance of
consciousness seems unnatural to me. I would like to think that it
somehow separated from its hanging filaments and then retracted
like a breath into the membrane from which it came, becoming a newmemory of the biosphere nervous system, but I have no data to prove
it.
watson,j.a.l., nel,j.j.c. and hewitt, p.h., once collected large
numbers of termites from the wild and observed them together,
either in groups or in pairs. Termites placed in groups become
increasingly friendly and active, but show no inclination to lay eggs or
mate; Instead, they reduced their water intake, focused on losing
weight, and increased mitochondrial metabolic activity in their flight
muscles. The congregating termites are constantly touching each
other with tentacles, and this seems to be the central control
mechanism. The important thing is to be touched, not to be touched.
Without antennae, any termite can still become a termite in the
colony, as long as it is frequently enough touched by other termites.
Viruses, formerly thought of as single-minded agents of disease
and death, are now taking on the appearance of active genes. The
process of evolution is still an endless, tedious biological game in
which only the winner stays at the table, but the rules of play seem to
be getting more flexible. We live in a matrix of dancing viruses that,
like bees, dart from organism to organism, from plant to insect to
mammal to me and back again, to the sea, hugging a few pieces of
this genome, pulling on a few pieces of that genome, scions
transplanted with dna, Passing on genetic traits like dishes at a big
dinner party. They may be the mechanism by which new, mutant dna
circulates most widely among us. If this is the case, then the strange
viral diseases to which we in the medical field must focus so much
attention can be seen as accidents, as an oversight.
98. Even when circumstances call for a win or a loss, the
transaction need not be a battle. The indifference shown by members
of several species of Marine coelenterate fans to one another
suggests that the mechanism for maintaining individuality must have
existed long before the evolution of immune mechanisms. The fans
always grow close together in clumps, forming clumps of branches,
but they do not merge with each other. If they did, their forms would
be a mess. theodor (j.l.) showed in a series of beautiful experiments
that when two individuals of the same species are placed together in
close contact, the smaller one always disintegrates first. This
self-destruction comes from a cracking mechanism that is completely
controlled by the smaller ones. It doesn'tIt was thrown out of the field, not defeated by force, not
defeated by firepower, it just voluntarily withdrew. It is not necessarily
comforting to know that such things happen in the biological world,
but it is at least comforting to be surprised.
The oxygen in the atmosphere is produced by chloroplasts in
plants (surprisingly, chloroplasts also live in the straws of giant clams
and lower sea creatures). In tissue culture, it is a natural tendency for
genetically unrelated cells to come together and fuse into hybrid cells
regardless of species. The inflammatory and immune mechanisms
really have to be designed to be very powerful to keep us creatures
apart. Without these rather diligent mechanisms, we might have
evolved into a kind of floating syncytium that covered the earth, and
not a single flower would have grown on the earth.
We may feel that it is possible to accept other life forms from
other planets simply out of kindness.
Our planet, after all, contains vitamin b12 in rain! parker,b. c.,
calculated that convective storms carried b12 from the soil to the
upper atmosphere when the fields were tilled, and that the amount
of B12 in the rain water was sufficient to make a single naked algal
flower visible in the vast pool.
Communication systems used in science should provide simple
and easy to operate models for studying the mechanisms of
information accumulation in human society.
As ziman,j.m. noted in a recent article in Nature, "The invention
of a mechanism for the systematic dissemination of the fragmentary
pieces of knowledge obtained in scientific work must be regarded as a
pivotal event in the history of modern science." 】
Finally, I would like to express my sincere thanks to Thomas for
his "Mechanism" and to Dr. Lewis Thomas, a member of the American
Academy of Sciences, for their tremendous contributions to mankind.
Thank you forever, thank you! ...
Zhao Daqing Qiang Yanping January 1, 2024
Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 265Important
bibliographyNature and Greek Science and Humanism, Translated by Erwin
Schrodinger, Zhang Butian, Commercial Press, February 2015
What Is Life? By Erwin Schrodinger (translated by Luo Lai and Luo
Luo Liao), Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House, 2003
Origin of Species, Darwin Commercial Press, May 1995
Give You the Fulcrum of Innovation, edited by Qiang Yanping,
Science Popularization Press, 2003
Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, Lu Ruilan, Li Changsheng, Jilin
People's Publishing House
The year 1997
Wang Zikun. Shanghai People's Publishing House, 1978
A Brief History of Science: The History of Science from the
Perspective of the Development of Scientific Instruments, by Thomas
Clapp (translated by Zhu Runsheng), China Youth Press, 2005
Source of Independent Innovation of Original Technological
Invention Methods, Zhao Daqing, Qiang Yanping, Huaxia Publishing
House, 2006
A System of Linnaeus's Dreams of Passion and Natural Order,
HELEN SCHMITZ, NILS UDDENBERG, NATUR KULTUR, 2007
Hawking's Universe by David Felzin, Zhao Fuyuan-yi, Hainan
Publishing House, 2000
Theory on the Operation of Celestial Bodies by Nicolaus
Copernicus (Translated by Ye Shihui) Wuhan Publishing House, 1992
Ten Questions and Reflections of Hawking, by Stephen Hawking,
Hunan Science and Technology Publishing House, 2019
Why People Are People, edited by Zizi Teng Fangyan, Peking
University Press, December 1990
"Man is a Machine," Farrah Metrie Commercial Press, August
1959, "Positioning," Mei Ai. Lisjak. Trout Machine Press, October 2016
On Tools, Ancient Greek Aristotle, Guangdong People's
Publishing House, March 1984
The Mystery of the Universe, Liu Yaoze, Inner Mongolia People's
Publishing House, June 2007
The Hope of Disease, Detot Detlefsenlut. Dahl, Chunfeng Literary
and Art Publishing House, September 1999
A Brief History of Astronomy by Favoguler, Shanghai Science and
Technology Publishing House, December 1959
A Tribute to Cellular Life, Lewis Thomas, Hunan Science andTechnology Publishing House, December 1998
266 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)
Fundamental Theory of Global Life Science I (" The Law of Global
Plate Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang ") 267
268 Basic Theory of Global Life Science I (The Law of Global Plate
Heredity - The Whole Life of the Big Bang)catalogue
Self-preface 1
Chapter One History of Natural science The origin of
epistemology in Ancient Greece and the human natural Sciences
Learning (infancy)) The Greeks first built the pyramid of natural
science brilliant became the first cornerstone of modern natural
science for all mankind
Ptolemy pioneered "point-to-point" to reveal the "back phase" of
the origin of quantum entanglement of planets in the Big Bang
Antithesis "Epistemology 5
The Big Bang force is the microscopic quantum entanglement
that existed at the beginning of "quantum entanglement" 6
Three Ptolemy used "counterpoints" for the world's human
scientific pyramid of the universe "everything is number" quantity
Subapplication foundation 7
Four Ptolemaic geostationary histories have long passed on to
human science "post-relativistic understanding of the universe.
On the "Great Cosmic Pattern of the Scientific Pyramid" 8
The five Copernican "heliocentrism" of the celestial sphere did
not change the pyramid of Ptolemaic astronomy [a "post-relativistic"
epistemology] but evolved the perfect elliptical orbit of the universe
and the art of cosmic harmony
Why did Aristotle's encyclopedias, especially physics, dominate
the history of human science for more than 2,000 years and become
the basis of modern science thanks to Ptolemy's "post-relativistic"
epistemology
The collision of Aristotle's Law of inertia and Galileo's Law of
inertia produced a great new era of experimental science, highlighting
the "post-relativistic" epistemology that makes human science
pyramid constantly rise to the peak
11The "Galilean relativity" principle is Ptolemy's "point to point" ["
post-relativistic "epistemology]
Eureka - a profound Epiphany of Copernican earth motion and
confirmation of "post-relativistic" epistemology
In classical mechanics can not subvert the rule of 11
Nine from Galileo to Newton the three laws of great steadfastly
extended Socrates, Plato, and Asia
Aristotle leaps through the ages to the grand summit of the base
of Ptolemy's pyramid of human science
Litre 12
Ten [post-relativistic epistemology] origins of the Big Bang in
ancient Greece in 3000 years of city-state perfection
Create the supreme pyramid of human science uninterruptible
eternal glory 14
11 History of science proves that Einstein's use of
"post-relativistic" epistemology to discover "general relativity"
confirms the most valuable thinking methodology of the pyramid of
human science in ancient Greece since 3000 years ago
12 The Copenhagen School, led by Bohr, and Einstein's
interpretation of the great controversy at the Solvay Conference
concluded that Einstein's "determinism" was completely wrong and
proved by the 2022 Nobel Prize 16
From Krause to Aspe to Zeilinger, generations of physicists have
finally proved with conclusive experimental data that quantum
entanglement is a real existence.
16
Fourteen scientists must go back and re-examine the
"Michelson-Morley experiment" as it did
Such is "a completely deterministic theory - the local hidden
variable theory." The product of Love. 18
Fifteen cosmic "quantum entanglement" faster-than-light in
quantum mechanics is unique to the real existence of human science
pyramid "faster-than-light" sublimation peak 19
The origin of holistic biology in the Big Bang The Greek prophets
had the foresight to create holistic biology and expand modern
medicine "wholeness" is an indisputable fact 22
17 American Academy of Sciences academician, clinical expertThomas on the human body and the universe of life on Earth overall
summary and "Gaia hypothesis" profound prediction 25
The Big Bang confirms that everything depends on the sun, but it
is in serious contradiction to the mainstream of modern science in a
cosmic timeline where the sun was born as early as 10 billion years
age.27
Chapter Two Lewis. Thomas's Theory of "whole life"
A "Lewis Principle" 30
The word "holism" was born in Thomas Clinical Medicine's
revival of the modern medical century
31
Three Thomas on the three inseparable advantages of holistic
biology 31
Four Mono experiments on the overall plate heredity proved 35
The third chapter of Mendel's classical genetics "whole plate
inheritance law" reveals the quantum nature of sex genes
A Mendelian genetic matrix 37
Two Mendelian genetic matrix 3:1 Mathematical highlights the
Big Bang life half a "four-dimensional model"
Reproductive deduction 39
Three from Mendelian 3:1 to Chagav base quantum gene
half-strain pairing implicant "integral plate.
Block genetic law "40
Four crack the whole sector heritage code 41
The Q-J equation 42 is derived from the Mendelian genetic
square
Vi. Discussion on Fibonacci mathematics underlying the
"Four-dimensional model" reproduction "of Q-J equation
Big data application of Equation Q-J in SARS epidemic and SARS
epidemic validation 44
The fourth chapter is "The Fulcrum of Innovation" Innovation
theory 2003 edition of scientific history review
The number theory of life born in Nine monasteries (according to
the original book chapter number) : 52
The fifth chapter "Give you the Fulcrum of innovation"
Innovation theory 2003 edition of scientific history review
Ten Find Mendel's key letters (in order of the original book
sequence number) 65The sixth chapter "The Fulcrum of Innovation in the Year"
Innovation theory 2003 edition of scientific history review
11 Franklin stops at the three steps (numbered by the original
book preface) 71
The seventh chapter is the Fulcrum of Innovation in the Year of
2003, a review of scientific history of innovation theory
Twelve, intersecting in the mysterious DNA (according to the
original book chapter sequence number) 76
The eighth chapter "The Fulcrum of Innovation in the Year"
Innovation theory 2003 edition of scientific history review
What exactly are thirteen genes (according to the original book
chapter sequence number) 82
Chapter 9: Franklin's indelible DNA achievements
A beautiful female scientist Franklin's "nominal degree" 88
Two Franklin received his doctorate after World War II and
entered King's College 88
Principle and algorithm of three diffraction patterns 88
The three-dimensional concept of the four-Franklin A-type
diffraction pattern implies quantum properties 89
Five of the only obituaries in the history of science to mourn the
double helix structure of type A DNA 90
Seven A-type DNA symmetries spontaneously form the double
helical structure 91
Eight or three papers published simultaneously in Nature show
that the first originator is misplaced 92
Nine "Dark Lady" immortal great goddess Scientist 92
The tenth chapter, The Law of Global Plate Heredity, witness and
discuss the comparison between the Big Bang theory of global life and
the latest genetic theory of Western scientists
1. Carmen Sapienza of Temple University
2, said S.Mattick, director of the Institute of Molecular Biology,
University of Queensland, Australia
3. Shinii Hirotsune, Saitama Medical University, Japan, May 2003
4. "The nice thing about RNA is that it has a special sequence, so
it's digital, like a zip code," says S.Mattick.
5. In 2004, it was reported that the CDC began to create hybrid
viruses using strains from the 1997 Hong Kong avian flu outbreak and
human influenza viruses commonly used in laboratories6, Nobel laureate Bishop discovered the mutation of primitive
cancer cells
7. R.Breaker's laboratory at Yale University in the United States
discovered the genetic switch
8. The wholeness of life is self-generated by the cell itself.
Western scientists have long had a holistic understanding of life at the
cellular level
9, the study of American scientists pointed out: "Two parts of the
genome mechanism shut down together.
10, the activity of genes, the operation of proteome functions,
are inseparable from the power of life
11. Reto, 7 March 1986. Dubock started the human Genome
Project
Professor StanIey B. Prusiner, University of California, San
Francisco, USA, 12, 1982 for the discovery of prions
13. From the history of human life sciences, biology is the
product of the replacement of "natural philosophy" in the 19th
century
Chapter 11: Summary and Discussion of the Theory of "Whole
Plate Genetic Law" and "Specific Restriction Mechanism" with the
latest genetic theories of Western scientists (continued)
1, "cell from cell" is the whole basis of the whole biology, it
deduces the life "whole from whole"
2. One of the proverbs of the Bible is that God will always
preserve all the species He has created!
3. Let's discuss the "specific restriction mechanism" in terms of
the diversity of life species.
4. This "kiss of death" is more common at the cellular level
5. In fact, Mendel's theory of heredity has revealed the ins and
out of the mechanism of "specific restriction mechanism"
6. Darwin simply did not address the specific time and place of
human evolution
7. We have discussed the evolution and accumulation of feeding
genes in the Law of Integral Plate Heredity, and believe that organisms
(for example, humans) pass through "eating genes".
8. The historical record of human farming can be pushed back to
10,000 to 20,000 years ago, and the time without written records will
be billions of years or more ago9. The famous French biologist Buffon first proposed the three
factors of biological evolution
10, specifically, food genes into the human body is the most
ordered, food genes are the most ordered protein complex building
blocks
11, the struggle for survival is another form of expression of the
type of restriction mechanism
12, from the life spiral track to examine
13, The origin of life The age of DNA of life in the fossil record of
bacteria began long ago from bacteria
14, March 20, 2005 Purdue University pathologist Boluit et al
have found that the genes of plants have a self-correcting mechanism
15. Scientists have discovered discontinuous repeats and
intervals in the code order on DNA
16, the specific restriction mechanism is the only law to ensure
genetic stability
17, molecular biology can not solve the many contradictions
between human disease and health, let alone cure the plague
The lack of integrity of the "systems biology" that emerged in the
late 18th and 20th centuries remained within the framework of cell
biology
In the second half of the 19th and 20th centuries, scientists
realized the double helix structure of DNA by Watson and Crick under
the guidance of Schrodinger's quantum life theory
20, "Holistic biology" is the advent of big science in the 21st
century, and people began to understand the movement of life from a
holistic and systematic point of view
Chapter 12 Origin of ecological entropy of life
An ecological entropy is due to the Big Bang Force 119
The Origin of two singularities 119
The three cosmic genetic codes at the "singularity" already exist
in the universe with 120 quantum properties of life
About 1 second after the birth of the universe, the temperature
everywhere was about 10 billion degrees, conforming to the
"abundance of light elements.
Degree "121
5 Cosmic life accelerates "expansion" and "death" 121
Six Big Bang Planck time (seconds) and energy ring scale① 122Seven Big Bang Planck time (seconds) and energy ring scale ②
122
Chapter 13 reveals the encryption of the Big Bang genetic code
principles in the universal legacy representations of planetary solar
systems
One Kepler planetary "Universal law" 124
Two Kepler's three Laws of planets 124
The Broad spectrum encryption and application of Kepler's Third
Law from the Intelligent Force of the Big Bang 124
Kepler revealed 124 Secrets of the harmony of the whole life
system of the Great Universe system
The mysterious cycle of Halley's Comet shows that the universal
harmony of gravity began in the Big Bang
Six Newtonian laws of gravitation miraculously discovered
Neptune as the fundamental planet of the Big Bang
M126
Seven measurements of the temperature distribution of hot gas
in galaxies and star clusters are cited 127
8 Modern World scientists Admit that the Big Bang was "the
mind of God" 127
The ghostly Action at a distance is a subversion of the
Michelson-Morley experiment
Chapter 14 The Big Bang: The Three-dimensional Structure of
DNA Formed by Life and the Soft Closed System of Life
For a life to be "alive" there must be a "soft closed system" 131
Ecological energy is the fundamental nature of the existence of
life in "soft closed systems"
Three soft closed systems next to "ecological entropy" 132
Four "ecological entropy" four elements 132
Five "ecological entropy" three elements are the energy source
of life "soft closed system" 133
Six ancient fossils prove that bacteria and microbes were born
about 10 billion years ago
The ancient Greeks had long revealed the vital nature of the
"soft closed system" of the human body
Thomas VIII: "But any idea that life on Earth is fragile is a human
illusion.
The Nine Burgess fossils push the origin of life back 500 millionyears or more from mere fossil impressions of modern humans to
Darwin's nightmare 134
Ten modern soils formed microbial "soft closed systems" with 3.7
billion years of life properties still
However, the exact time band 135 of the Big Bang timeline is
missing
Chapter 15 Big Bang The birth of the Sun and the formation of
the solar system as a whole
2024年12月18日 13:52
ꄘ浏览量：0
